Table 1.
Methods | Advantages | Disadvantages |
---|---|---|
Phase-contrast MRI [6–8, 16–19] |
Allows quantitative velocity measurements Good motion specificity Easy to apply in conventional MRI |
Indirect measurement of displacement Sensitive to phase errors arising from eddy currents and gradient non-linearities Requiring numerical integration steps to quantify displacement data Requires multiple velocity encoding gradient directions and values to capture motion in all relevant directions, which can lead to long scan times Limited signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) |
Complementary Spatial Modulation of Magnetization (CSPAMM) [20] |
Quantitative method to measure motion in term of displacement Allows direct quantification of periodic caudal brain tissue displacement with no need to numerical integration steps Insensitive to phase-related image artefacts |
Limited SNR Limited displacement sensitivity and spatial resolution when measuring very small displacements Limited to only quantify brain motion measurement in the cranial–caudal direction Reduced reproducibility of displacement measurements occurs at later cardiac phases because of tag fading caused by T1 relaxation decay Spatial blurring of the displacement in edges of structures moving independently |
Displacement Encoding with Stimulated Echoes (DENSE) [3, 4, 21–26] |
Quantitative method to measure motion in terms of displacement and strains Direct measurement of the displacement High spatial and temporal resolution Sensitive to very small (0.01 mm) brain displacements with good reproducibility |
Long scan time Causes ghosting artefacts Limited SNR Limited accuracy in dynamic displacement |
Anatomical landmark motion tracking using pixel-shifting analysis [27, 28] |
Quantitative method to measure motion in term of velocity and displacement Good for analysis neural structure within the intracranial CSF Sensitive to detect cephalad and caudad cerebellar tonsil motion |
Long scan time Less accuracy and precision for measuring soft-tissue displacements Accuracy of timing parameter may be affected if lengths of trigger parameter delay Not very sensitive to sub-voxel motion |
Amplified MRI (aMRI) [5, 29–31] |
Qualitative method to visualise displacement Short scan time compared to phase-contrast MRI Ability to reveal smaller motions Does not require phase-encoding in multiple directions to capture the full extent of brain motion Can achieve higher spatial resolution compared to DENSE High SNR Easy to implement using existing scan sequences |
Currently lacks the ability to directly quantify motion |