Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 15;36(1):3–14. doi: 10.1007/s10334-022-01043-1

Table 1.

General advantages and disadvantages of each MRI method

Methods Advantages Disadvantages
Phase-contrast MRI [68, 1619]

Allows quantitative velocity measurements

Good motion specificity

Easy to apply in conventional MRI

Indirect measurement of displacement

Sensitive to phase errors arising from eddy currents and gradient non-linearities

Requiring numerical integration steps to quantify displacement data

Requires multiple velocity encoding gradient directions and values to capture motion in all relevant directions, which can lead to long scan times

Limited signal-to-noise ratio (SNR)

Complementary Spatial Modulation of Magnetization (CSPAMM) [20]

Quantitative method to measure motion in term of displacement

Allows direct quantification of periodic caudal brain tissue displacement with no need to numerical integration steps

Insensitive to phase-related image artefacts

Limited SNR

Limited displacement sensitivity and spatial resolution when measuring very small displacements

Limited to only quantify brain motion measurement in the cranial–caudal direction

Reduced reproducibility of displacement measurements occurs at later cardiac phases because of tag fading caused by T1 relaxation decay

Spatial blurring of the displacement in edges of structures moving independently

Displacement Encoding with Stimulated Echoes (DENSE) [3, 4, 2126]

Quantitative method to measure motion in terms of displacement and strains

Direct measurement of the displacement

High spatial and temporal resolution

Sensitive to very small (0.01 mm) brain displacements with good reproducibility

Long scan time

Causes ghosting artefacts

Limited SNR

Limited accuracy in dynamic displacement

Anatomical landmark motion tracking using pixel-shifting analysis [27, 28]

Quantitative method to measure motion in term of velocity and displacement

Good for analysis neural structure within the intracranial CSF

Sensitive to detect cephalad and caudad cerebellar tonsil motion

Long scan time

Less accuracy and precision for measuring soft-tissue displacements

Accuracy of timing parameter may be affected if lengths of trigger parameter delay

Not very sensitive to sub-voxel motion

Amplified MRI (aMRI) [5, 2931]

Qualitative method to visualise displacement

Short scan time compared to phase-contrast MRI

Ability to reveal smaller motions

Does not require phase-encoding in multiple directions to capture the full extent of brain motion

Can achieve higher spatial resolution compared to DENSE

High SNR

Easy to implement using existing scan sequences

Currently lacks the ability to directly quantify motion