Dear Editor,
Neurologic manifestations associated with many COVID-19 patients, including acute infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) and long COVID, have been proven by increasing evidence.1 To date, most studies have focused on how SARS-CoV-2 invades the nervous system and the consequent neuropathological changes.2,3 In contrast, the specific mechanism by which SARS-CoV-2 infection leads to neurological disease remains unclear.
TAR DNA-binding protein (TDP-43) is a primary component of insoluble aggregates associated with several devastating nervous system disorders, including amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and multiple forms of frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD).4 Gene mutation, abnormal phase separation and viral infection have been identified as major causes of TDP-43 aggregation.5,6 In this study, we investigated the effects of SARS-CoV-2 translated products on host TDP-43 and its functions.
We initially performed unbiased screening of the effects of 26 proteins encoded by the SARS-CoV-2 genome on the expression of TDP-43 (Supplementary Fig. 1a) and noted a specific band of approximately 36 kDa in the immunoblotting data for TDP-43 only in the presence of the main viral protease Nsp5/Mpro/3CLpro. Other examined viral proteins, including SARS-CoV-2 papain-like protease Nsp3, had no detectable influence on the expression levels of TDP-43 (Fig. 1a and Supplementary Fig. 1b). By detecting endogenous TDP-43, we subsequently confirmed that the novel band was an Nsp5-cleaved form of TDP-43 (Fig. 1b). By using the N-terminal-tagged TDP-43 ectopic expression system, the detected band was found to be an N-terminal TDP-43 product of viral Nsp5 cleavage, termed TDP-43 NTF (Supplementary Fig. 1c).
Mutant TDP-43 proteins are frequently cleaved by intracellular caspases in neurodegenerative diseases.5 To explore the mechanism by which viral Nsp5 cleaves TDP-43, several inhibitors were used, including a lysosomal inhibitor (chloroquine, CQ), proteasome inhibitor (MG132), pancaspase inhibitor (Z-VAD), and viral 3CLpro inhibitor (GC376).7 Only GC376 treatment blocked TDP-43 cleavage by Nsp5, while the others showed no significant effect (Fig. 1c). Previous studies, however, have reported the inhibitory effects of MG132 and Z-VAD-FMK against the enzyme activity of Nsp5 using a fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET)-based assay in vitro.8 The discrepancy may be due to the usage of the different evaluation systems. Moreover, inhibition of GC376 occurred in a dose-dependent manner (EC50 = 5 μm) without cytotoxicity (Fig. 1d and Supplementary Fig. 2), and TDP-43 cleavage was abolished in the activity-deficient Nsp5-C145A mutant (Fig. 1e). Overall, SARS-CoV-2 shows distinct strategies, from TDP-43 proteinopathy to direct cleavage of TDP-43 through the protease activity of Nsp5.
Considering the high degree of homology between Nsp5 proteins from SARS-CoV-2 and other coronaviruses, including severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) and Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) (Supplementary Fig. 3), we further determined that all three tested Nsp5 proteins are able to cleave TDP-43 (Fig. 1f). GC376 treatment broadly inhibited Nsp5 function. Interestingly, SARS-CoV-2 Nsp5 showed lower expression levels but higher efficiency in TDP-43 cleavage than Nsp5 from SARS-CoV or MERS-CoV. Moreover, viral protease Nsp5 from SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern (Beta and Omicron) also efficiently triggered TDP-43 cleavage (Supplementary Fig. 4). These results suggest that TDP-43 is a common substrate for coronavirus Nsp5.
Multiple sequence alignment using MEGA and logo analysis of identified SARS-CoV-2 Nsp5 cleavage sites revealed that this viral protease preferentially recognizes substrates containing the core sequence “LQS” for proteolytic cleavage (Fig. 1g). According to the molecular size of the cleavage product we detected, we found similar motif sequences centered at 331Gln (Fig. 1h). Furthermore, the mutant TDP-43-Q331A was resistant to cleavage by coronavirus Nsp5 compared to wild-type TDP-43 (Fig. 1i and Supplementary Fig. 5). Hence, SARS-CoV-2 Nsp5 cleaves TDP-43 at residue Q331.
Next, we investigated the influence of Nsp5 on TDP-43 solubility, which has been considered to be a major cause of neurotoxicity in degenerative diseases. We used a well-established TDP-43 solubility assay and confirmed that TDP-43 NTF exhibited strongly decreased solubility compared to that of wild-type TDP-43 (Fig. 1j). Fluorescent confocal microscopy further detected increased inclusions by TDP-43 NTF (Fig. 1k, l). Consistent with this result, Nsp5 expression significantly decreased the solubility of TDP-43 proteins (Fig. 1m). We noted that both cleaved and full-length TDP-43 accumulated in the insoluble fraction in the presence of Nsp5 (Fig. 1m). In addition, TDP-43 NTF interacted with full-length TDP-43 (Supplementary Fig. 6). These results indicate that Nsp5-cleaved TDP-43 NTF can serve as a dominant-negative mutant of wild-type TDP-43, which may further amplify the effects of Nsp5 on TDP-43 protein solubility and function.
Our findings led us to investigate the cytotoxic effects of Nsp5 cleavage of TDP-43 in neural cells. In SH-SY5Y human neuroblastoma cells, TDP-43 expression resulted in higher cytotoxicity with increased LDH release in the presence of Nsp5 in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 1n). We used the Nsp5-resistant mutant TDP-43-Q331A as a negative control, which had no influence on TDP-43 cytotoxicity, with or without Nsp5 expression (Fig. 1n). Similar results were also observed in T98G human glioblastoma cells (Supplementary Fig. 7). We also found that ectopic expression of TDP-43 Q331A relieved Nsp5-triggered neurotoxicity (Supplementary Fig. 8), further supporting the ability of Nsp5 to cause neural damage Nsp5 via cleavage of TDP-43.
The observed dependence of 3CLpro activity on Nsp5-mediated TDP-43 cleavage led us to measure the effects of the small-molecule inhibitor GC376 on Nsp5 neurotoxicity. As expected, GC376 alleviated the inhibition of LDH release and neural cell proliferation triggered by Nsp5 expression without cytotoxicity (Fig. 1o, p and Supplementary Fig. 9). Thus, Nsp5 is a viral neurotoxic factor, and its 3CLpro activity is a druggable target for relieving neural damage.
SARS-CoV-2 infection results in multilineage neural cell dysregulation, decreased new neuron generation, and a reduction in overall brain size in patients, even those with mild respiratory COVID-19.2 The infectivity of SARS-CoV-2 in neural cells has been confirmed in human neural progenitor cells, brain organoids and nonhuman primates.3,9,10 Overall, there is a critical need to determine which viral factors contribute to central nervous system (CNS) disorders. Hence, our identification of Nsp5 as cytotoxic towards neuroblasts and glial cells demonstrates a direct killing effect of SARS-CoV-2 infection on neuronal cells through TDP-43 cleavage, which may lead to further CNS dysfunction, including neuroinflammation. Nevertheless, the effects of TDP-43 cleavage by the viral protease Nsp5 on host neural damage still need to be further confirmed in organoids, animal models, and infected patients.
The number of COVID-19 cases continues to rise and now exceeds 625 million worldwide, and long COVID has emerged and cannot be ignored. Considering that TDP-43 dysfunction has been well defined as a hallmark associated with several neurodegenerative diseases,4 including ALS, FTLD and Alzheimer’s disease, whether the devastating effect of Nsp5-mediated TDP-43 cleavage can be reversed after infection and the relationship between SARS-CoV-2 infection and a high risk of neurodegenerative-like diseases urgently need to be investigated with additional research.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
We thank Yuanyuan Li for their technical assistance. We thank Pei-Hui Wang for their critical reagents. This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32222005 and 82172246), the National Major Project for Infectious Disease Control and Prevention (2018ZX10731-101-001-016), the Department of Science and Technology of Jilin Province (No. 20190304033YY and 20180101127JC), the Open Project of Key Laboratory of Organ Regeneration and Transplantation, Ministry of Education, the Program for JLU Science and Technology Innovative Research Team (2017TD-08), and Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities.
Author contributions
J.Y., S.W., Y.L., H.L., L.Z., and H.Z. performed the experiments. W.W., J.Y., PH. W., X.Z., and X.-F.Y., analysed the data. W.W. and J.Y. wrote the paper with help from all authors. W.W. directed the project.
Data availability
The raw data are available from the corresponding authors.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
These authors contributed equally: Jiaxin Yang, Yan Li
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41392-023-01386-8.
References
- 1.Spudich S, Nath A. Nervous system consequences of COVID-19. Science (New York, NY) 2022;375:267–269. doi: 10.1126/science.abm2052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Fernández-Castañeda A, et al. Mild respiratory COVID can cause multi-lineage neural cell and myelin dysregulation. Cell. 2022;185:2452–2468.e2416. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2022.06.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Zhang B, et al. SARS-CoV-2 infects human neural progenitor cells and brain organoids. Cell Res. 2020;30:928–931. doi: 10.1038/s41422-020-0390-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Tziortzouda P, Van Den Bosch L, Hirth F. Triad of TDP43 control in neurodegeneration: autoregulation, localization and aggregation. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2021;22:197–208. doi: 10.1038/s41583-021-00431-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Zhang Y, et al. Aberrant cleavage of TDP-43 enhances aggregation and cellular toxicity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2009;106:7607–7612. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0900688106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Odeh HM, Shorter J. Aggregates of TDP-43 protein spiral into view. Nature. 2022;601:29–30. doi: 10.1038/d41586-021-03605-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Fu L, et al. Both Boceprevir and GC376 efficaciously inhibit SARS-CoV-2 by targeting its main protease. Nat. Commun. 2020;11:4417. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-18233-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Wang Z, et al. Identification of proteasome and caspase inhibitors targeting SARS-CoV-2 M(pro) Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2021;6:214. doi: 10.1038/s41392-021-00639-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Rutkai I, et al. Neuropathology and virus in brain of SARS-CoV-2 infected non-human primates. Nat. Commun. 2022;13:1745. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-29440-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Beckman D, et al. SARS-CoV-2 infects neurons and induces neuroinflammation in a non-human primate model of COVID-19. Cell Rep. 2022;41:111573. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The raw data are available from the corresponding authors.