Abstract
Salmonellosis is a common infectious disease in humans caused by Salmonella spp., which in recent years has shown an increase in its incidence, with products of avian origin being a common source of transmission. To present a successful infective cycle, there are molecular mechanisms such as virulence factors that provide characteristics that facilitate survival, colonization, and damage to the host. According to this, the study aims to characterize the virulence factors of Salmonella spp. strains isolated from broilers (n = 39) and humans (n = 10). The presence of 24 virulence genes was evaluated using end-point PCR. All the strains of Salmonella spp. isolated from broiler chickens revealed presence of 7/24 (29, 16%) virulence genes (lpfA, csgA, sitC, sipB, sopB, sopE, and sivH). Regarding the strains isolated from cases of gastroenteritis in humans, all strains contained (14/24, 58, 33%) virulence genes (lpfA, csgA, pagC, msgA, spiA, sitC, iroN, sipB, orgA, hilA, sopB, sifA, avrA, and sivH). In summary, the presence of virulence genes in different strains of Salmonella isolated from broilers and humans could be described as bacteria with potential pathogenicity due to the type and number of virulence genes detected. These findings are beneficial for the pathogenic monitoring of Salmonella in Colombia.
1. Introduction
Salmonellosis is a foodborne disease with the greatest impact worldwide on both humans and animals [1, 2]. This disease is caused by the Salmonella in which more than 2,700 serotypes have been reported so far [3]. In humans, the consumption of chicken meat and eggs that were contaminated is conduced to develop the disease because they are considered the main reservoir and vehicle of Salmonella [1, 4]. Moreover, food contamination could occur in various stages of the food chain such as production, distribution, and sale [5]. The serotype, infective dose, virulence factors, and host immunity will influence the disease's clinical presentation [6]. Salmonellosis in humans is characterized by symptoms such as acute fever, abdominal pain, diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting; however, immunocompromised people and children under 5 years of age and older adults can present severe symptoms [7, 8]. In 2018, the EU member states reported 5146 foodborne outbreaks where 33% correspond to illnesses caused by Salmonella [7].
Host-pathogen interactions in bacteria can modulate the expression of some genes to adapt to the environment, influencing their ability to cause illness [9]. Therefore, the virulence genes facilitate the survival, colonization, and damage of the host [10]. Expression of virulence genes will initiate when Salmonella spp. faces the hostile environment of the hosts' gastrointestinal tract compound of a wide variety of conditions such as osmolarity, oxygen tension, and pH which favor interaction with the target cell during pathogenesis [2]. The molecular mechanisms of pathogenicity used by Salmonella involve genes, grouped in regions called pathogenicity islands that provide new characteristics that allow it to undergo a successful infective cycle [11]. These genetic segments linked to virulence functions are known as Salmonella pathogenicity-island (SPI) and Salmonella has 24 identified [12]. In addition, SPI could be transmitted between bacteria by horizontal gene transfer and is related to virulence mechanisms such as host colonization, capsules, toxins, invasiveness, biofilm, fimbriae, flagella, serotype conversion, and secretion systems [12–14].
Overall, bacterial virulence factors are critical elements for systemic infections [11]. As a result, the pathogenicity of Salmonella has been associated with the number and type of virulence genes present in the chromosomal SPIs [15]. For example, genes such as SopB/SigD and SopE2 allow a rapid internalization of the bacteria playing an important role in Salmonella virulence [16]. Moreover, genes involved in the intracellular survival of Salmonella play a significant role in systemic disease in humans [17]. Meanwhile, adherence factors like fimbrial operons mediate the attachment of Salmonella serovars to epithelial cell lines [18]. Besides, Salmonella virulence plasmid plays a crucial role in enhancing the ability of particular serovars to multiply in tissues outside the intestinal tract [19]. Other genes, such as cdtB, code for the CdtB subunit considered as a toxin with a possibly important role in the unusually lengthy, persistent, and development of systemic diseases [20, 21].
Despite being a public health concern, there are insufficient studies on virulence factors in Salmonella spp. isolates from broilers and humans in Colombia; also, without specific information, it is difficult to predict the success of Salmonella control schemes. Thus, it is important to know the genomic particularities in each of the serotypes belonging to this genus; this allows to clarify the bacterial dynamics in the different animal hosts and prevent outbreaks in humans and animals [11]. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate the potential virulence of Salmonella isolates from poultry and human by detecting the presence of 24 genes involved in virulence and pathogenicity using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Accordingly, the results of this study could lay the foundation for further research on public health security and food safety problems caused by Salmonella infections in Colombia.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Salmonella Strains
In this study, 49 Salmonella enterica strains from the Bacterial Strain Collection of the Laboratory of Immunology and Molecular Biology were included, and Salmonella enteritidis (ATCC® 13076™) were used as a positive control. The strains were previously serotyped using the Kauffmann−White scheme and correspond to the serotypes, namely, S. enteritidis (n = 4), S. typhimurium (n = 2), S. braenderup (n = 1), S. newport (n = 1), S. grupensis (n = 1), and S. uganda (n = 1) isolated from cases of gastroenteritis in humans [22] and S. paratyphi B (n = 24) and S. heidelberg (n = 15) isolated from poultry farms located in the region of Tolima [23] and Santander [24].
2.2. DNA Extraction
Fresh bacterial colonies were used for Genomic DNA (gDNA) extraction using the Invisorb Spin Universal Kit (Stratec Molecular, Berlin, Germany) following the protocol suggested by the fabricant and were stored at −20°C until further use. Molecular confirmation of Salmonella isolates was done by amplification of a fragment of invA gene (accession number M90846.1) by endpoint PCR.
2.3. Virulence Genes
The molecular characterization of 24 genes involved in virulence and pathogenicity was conducted using the gDNA of Salmonella spp. (Table 1). A single PCR assay was used to detect each one of the 24 virulence genes. Primers and annealing temperature used for PCR are listed in Table 1. The reactions were carried out following the manufacturer's recommendation for the GoTaq® Flexi DNA Taq polymerase (Promega, Madison, WI, United States), 1 μL of DNA, and 1 μL of each primer (10 pmol/μL). The ProFlex™ 3 × 32-well PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, CA, United States) was used to perform the amplification using an initial denaturation for 3 minutes at 95°C, 35 cycles of denaturation for 30 seconds at 95°C, 30 seconds of annealing (Table 1), extension at 72°C, and final extension for 5 minutes at 72°C. The PCR products were detected by electrophoresis in agarose gel using HydraGreen (ACTGene, Piscataway, NJ, United States) as an intercalant agent, and the visualization of the gel was conducted in the gel documentation equipment ENDURO GDS (Labnet International, Edison, NJ, United States).
Table 1.
Primer sequences for virulence genes in Salmonella spp.
| Virulence factor | Gene | Primer sequences | Annealing temperature (°C) | Amplicon size (bp) | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fimbriae | lpfC | F-GCCCCGCCTGAAGCCTGTGTTGC | 58 | 641 | [25] |
| R-AGGTCGCCGCTGTTTGAGGTTGGATA | |||||
| pefA | F-GCGCCGCTCAGCCGAACCAG | 59 | 157 | ||
| R-GCAGCAGAAGCCCAGGAAACAGTG | |||||
| lpfA | F-CTTTCGCTGCTGAATCTGGT | 46 | 250 | ||
| R-CAGTGTTAACAGAAACCAGT | |||||
| csgA | F-TCCACAATGGGGCGGCGGCG | 54 | 350 | ||
| R-CCTGACGCACCATTACGCTG | |||||
| sefA | F-GATACTGCTGAACGTAGAAGG | 54 | 488 | ||
| R-GCGTAAATCAGCATCTGCAGTAGC | |||||
| Plasmid | spvB | F-CTATCAGCCCCGCACGGAGAGCAGTTTTTA | 58 | 717 | |
| R-GGAGGAGGCGGTGGCGGTGGCATCATA | |||||
| Survival inside cells | tolC | F-TACCCAGGCGCAAAAAGAGGCTATC | 55 | 161 | |
| R-CCGCGTTATCCAGGTTGTTGC | |||||
| pagC | F-CGCCTTTTCCGTGGGGTATGC | 55 | 454 | ||
| R-GAAGCCGTTTATTTTTGTAGAGGAGATGTT | |||||
| msgA | F-GCCAGGCGCACGCGAAATCATCC | 57 | 189 | ||
| R-GCGACCAGCCACATATCAGCCTCTTCAAAC | |||||
| spiA | F-CCAGGGGTCGTTAGTGTATTGCGTGAGATG | 56 | 550 | ||
| R-CGCGTAACAAAGAACCCGTAGTGATGGATT | |||||
| Toxins | cdtB | F-ACAACTGTCGCATCTCGCCCCGTCATT | 57 | 268 | |
| R-CAATTTGCGTGGGTTCTGTAGGTGCGAGT | |||||
| Iron metabolism | sitC | F-CAGTATATGCTCAACGCGATGTGGGTCTCC | 58 | 768 | |
| R-CGGGGCGAAAATAAAGGCTGTGATGAAC | |||||
| iroN | F-ACTGGCACGGCTCGCTGTCGCTCTAT | 58 | 1205 | ||
| R-CGCTTTACCGCCGTTCTGCCACTGC | |||||
| Structure, the invasion-associated type III secretion system | prgH | F-GCCCGAGCAGCCTGAGAAGTTAGAAA | 57 | 756 | |
| R-TGAAATGAGCGCCCCTTGAGCCAGTC | |||||
| spaN | F-AAAAGCCGTGGAATCCGTTAGTGAAGT | 55 | 504 | ||
| R-CAGCGCTGGGGATTACCGTTTTG | |||||
| sipB | F-GGACGCCGCCCGGGAAAAACTCTC | 58 | 875 | ||
| R-ACACTCCCGTCGCCGCCTTCACAA | |||||
| invA | F-GTGAAATTATCGCCACGTTCGGGCAA | 55 | 284 | ||
| R-TCATCGCACCGTCAAAGGAACC | |||||
| orgA | F-TTTTTGGCAATGCATCAGGGAACA | 55 | 255 | ||
| R-GGCGAAAGCGGGGACGGTATT | |||||
| Regulatory protein, the invasion-associated type III secretion system | hilA | F-CTGCCGCAGTGTTAAGGATA | 50 | 497 | |
| R-CTGTCGCCTTAATCGCATGT | |||||
| Effector protein, the invasion-associated type III secretion system | sopB | F-CGGACCGGCCAGCAACAAAACAAGAAGAAG | 57 | 220 | |
| R-TAGTGATGCCCGTTATGCGTGAGTGTATT | |||||
| sifA | F-TTTGCCGAACGCGCCCCCACACG | 58 | 449 | ||
| R-GTTGCCTTTTCTTGCGCTTTCCACCCATCT | |||||
| avrA | F-AGCCTGGCGCTCGCCAAAAA | 57 | 123 | [26] | |
| R-GCGGTCTGCTTTATCGGACGGG | |||||
| sopE | F-GAGGGCCGGGCAGTGTTGAC | 55 | 121 | ||
| R-CTTCACGGGTCTGGCTGGCG | |||||
| sivH | F-AGCGCGCTGAATGCGGTGAT | 55 | 121 | ||
| R-TCTTGTCGCGCCACAGCAGG |
3. Results
3.1. Confirmation of Salmonella
All Salmonella strains amplified the expected DNA fragment of the invA gene that was used to confirm the Salmonella genus (Figure 1).
Figure 1.

Gel image of the PCR amplification of a DNA fragment from the invA gene (284 bp) of representative Salmonella strains isolated from broiler farms. MP-100 bp DNA ladder (Solis BioDyne, Estonia); 1–4: S. heidelberg; 5–9: S. paratyphi B; 10: S. newport; 11-12: S. enteritidis; 13: S. braenderup; 14: S. uganda; 15: S. grupensis; 16: S. typhimurium; 17: negative control E. coli ATCC 25922; 18: positive control S. enteritidis ATCC 13076.
3.2. Distribution of Salmonella Virulence Genes
All the isolates carried the lpfA, csgA, invA, sivH, sopB, and sitC genes (n = 49/49). Regarding poultry isolates, the detection rate of the sopE gene was 100% (n = 39/39), while fimbria-associated genes such as sefA, lpfC, and lpfA were present in 51.3% (n = 20/39), 87.2% (n = 34/39), and 97.2% (n = 34/39). Genes associated with type III secretion systems (TTSS) virulence that function as orgA, prgH, and spaN were found in 71.8% (n = 37/39), 74.4% (n = 36/39), and 79.5% (n = 31/39), respectively, of the poultry isolates that were analyzed (Table 2). The detection rate of an effector protein gene like avrA was 97.4% (n = 38/39). Gen with regulatory protein function as hilA was found in 94.9% (n = 37/39). Genes related to survival inside cells functions such as pagC, spiA, msgA, and tolC were present in 97.4% (n = 38/39), 97.4% (n = 38/39), 97.4% (n = 38/39), and 92.3% (n = 36/39) of the poultry strains that were analyzed. The detection rate of pSLT-mediated virulence genes such as spvB was 71.8% (n = 37/39). The iroN gen was present in 97.4% (n = 38/39) of the poultry isolates that were analyzed.
Table 2.
Patterns of virulence genes of Salmonella isolates obtained from poultry farms and cases of gastroenteritis in humans.
|
∗ For PCR-based patterns, black area represents a positive result and white area represents negative result for the presence of a virulence gene. Virulence-related function is a Fimbriae gene function; b is type three secretion system gene function, b1 structure, b2 is effector protein, b3 is regulatory protein; c is survival inside cells gene function; d is plasmid gene function, e is iron metabolism gene function, and f is toxins gene function.
On the other hand, all the isolates from cases of gastroenteritis in humans carried spiA, pagC, hilA, avrA, msgA, orgA, and iroN genes (Table 2). The detection rates of sefA, lpfC, and lpfA were 90% (n = 9/10), 80% (n = 8/10), and 60% (n = 6/10), respectively, whilst those for prgH and spaN genes were 90% (n = 9/10) and 80% (n = 8/10), respectively. The sopE gene was present in 70% (n = 7/10) of the human isolates, respectively. The detection rates of tolC and spvB genes were 60% (n = 6/10) and 60% (n = 6/10), respectively.
3.3. Virulence Gene Patterns in Salmonella Isolates
Detection of the twenty-four virulence genes by PCR classified 49 selected Salmonella isolates into 21 patterns (Table 2). The virulence gene patterns of cases of gastroenteritis in humans were Enteritidis (III), Braenderup (XXII), Newport (XX), Grupensis (XXV), Uganda (XXIII), and Typhimurium (XXIV).
The pattern III was the most predominant that was detected in 10 isolates (Heidelberg 3, Paratyphi B 4, Enteritidis 2). In poultry farm isolates, pattern II with 21 virulence genes was detected in 8 isolates (Heidelberg 4, and Paratyphi B 4). The pattern I was detected in 6 isolates (Heidelberg 3, Paratyphi B 3). Patterns X, XI, XII, XIII, XIV, XV, XVII, XVIII, and XIX were detected only in serotypes of Paratyphi B. Also, patterns II, IV, VII, and IX were only observed in Heidelberg isolates. Patterns I, III, V, and VIII were observed in poultry isolates.
4. Discussion
Salmonella species are ubiquitous pathogens that are considered the major agents of foodborne disease worldwide [27, 28]. In Salmonella spp., physiological and environmental stimuli drive the expression of virulence genes, which are responsible for the main pathogenic mechanisms in this microorganism [10, 29]. Virulence factors can maximize the fitness of pathogens via host exploitation [30]. Virulence factors are encoded by a number of genes and may be located on Salmonella pathogenicity islands (SPI), virulence plasmids (pSLT), bacteriophages, or at another location on the chromosome [25, 27, 31].
A few virulence factors are related with the cellular structure of the bacteria, such as fimbriae [32]. Fimbrial virulence genes represent a major player in pathogenesis by allowing bacteria to interact with host cells [33, 34]. In the present study, all the isolates carried the lpfA and csgA genes. Similarly, previous studies have found high detection of the csgA gene among Salmonella serotypes [25, 35]. The csgA gene is related to biofilm production and the maintenance of the bacteria in the environment, including inert surfaces [36]. Likewise, the presence of the csgA gene is relevant to public health because the csg genes in Salmonella are related to the ability to produce biofilms, leading to increased drug resistance [37]. In this way, the presence of the csgA gene in all the strains could suggest that the Salmonella strains could be kept on inert surfaces such as those used in food production, which is relevant to public health. In poultry isolates, the detection rate of fimbria-associated genes such as sefA and pefA were 51.3% and 74.4%, respectively, lower than the other virulence genes evaluated. Additionally, the detection rate of pefA was 60% in isolates from cases of gastroenteritis in humans. The presence of the sefA gene in Salmonella isolates is relevant because this gene is a promotor of the sef operon, and this operon is a mechanism by which Salmonella serotypes can adapt to an increasing number of hosts [25, 38]. Previous studies of virulence gene detection in Salmonella Heidelberg isolated from chicken carcasses did not report isolates with the sefA gene [25]. For this reason, it is possible that the presence of the sefA gene in Salmonella Heidelberg isolates could indicate a major virulence of the strains. Furthermore, sefA gene has been associated with the serotypes Enteritidis, Moscow, but the horizontal transfer methods allowed other serotypes to obtain different genes than that in the case of this study serotypes such as Paratyphi B and Braenderup, and Typhimurium carried the gene [39]. The absence of the pefA gene in some Salmonella serotypes is related to the location of the gene, which is plasmidial [40].
The type III secretion system (TTSS) encoded by Salmonella mediates, in a contact-dependent manner, the translocation of effector proteins from the bacterial cytoplasm into the host cell [41]. Some genes of TTSS are related to structure, effector protein, or regulatory protein of these systems [42]. The sipB, invA, orgA, prgH, and spaN genes are associated to the structure of TTSS, which allows Salmonella to invade phagocytic and nonphagocytic cells [40, 43]. The sipB and invA genes were found in 100% of the isolates that were assessed (n = 49/49). The sipB gene may play a vital role in Salmonella pathogenesis [44]. In the case where detection rates of the invA gene were expected, this gene is recognized as a rapid detection agent for the genus Salmonella, and this gene also indicates that all the strains are able to produce gastroenteritis and invade the cells [45, 46]. A high prevalence of orgA, prgH, and spaN genes in poultry and human isolates were observed in this study (71–100%). In the same way, previous research has detected sipB, orgA, prgH, and spaN genes in Salmonella isolates from poultry-related sources [47].
Furthermore, TTSS is employed by Salmonella to inject different “effector proteins” into host cells [48]. Each effector protein activates or blocks a specific host cell signaling pathway to establish symbioses or infectious diseases [49]. Some genes that encode the effector proteins are avrA, sopE, sopB, and sivH [50]. All the isolates carried the sivH, sopB, and sopE genes whilst the human isolates analyzed were 70%. The SopB gene can regulate changes in phosphatidylinositol signaling that could generate chloride secretion by epithelial cells [51]. Thus, the significance of the presence of the sopB gene is because of the fact that strains with this gene can cause diarrhea, and this disease leads to the elimination of large numbers of bacteria in the host's environment [52]. Consequently, the possession of this gene could increase the spread of Salmonella. High frequency of sivH and sopE may be explained by the fact that these genes are associated with an island which is unique to Salmonella infecting warm-blooded vertebrates [53, 54]. The detection rate of an effector protein gene like avrA gene was 97.4% in poultry and 100% in human isolates. AvrA protein plays a critical role in inhibiting inflammation, regulating epithelial apoptosis, and enhancing proliferation during bacterial infections [55–58]. On the other hand, gene with regulatory protein functioning as hilA was found in 94.9% in poultry isolates. All the isolates from cases of gastroenteritis in humans carried the hilA gene.
Some virulence genes may contribute to survival within the macrophage or intracellular survival, for example, pagC, spiA, msgA, and tolC genes [59]. The pagC gene is ubiquitously distributed among Salmonella serotypes [60]. As a result, prevalence found in pagC gene was 97.4% in poultry and 100% in human isolates. The detection rate of the spiA, msgA, and tolC genes was higher than 92.3% in all the poultry isolates that were analyzed. On the other hand, all the isolates from cases of gastroenteritis in humans carried pagC, spiA, and msgA genes. The high frequency of the spiA gene in poultry and human samples is considered critical due to the function of the gene that is related to the ability of the Salmonella serotypes to produce biofilms [25]. Biofilm is an important public health problem; it enhances resistance to physical forces, the host immune system, and antimicrobials [61, 62]. In this way, Salmonella strains with the spiA gene would survive longer in poultry farms and could contaminate meat and eggs, where contaminated food is a vehicle in the transmission of Salmonella to humans. The detection rate of tolC in human isolates was 60%. The tolC gene plays a crucial role in the excretion of a wide range of molecules, including antibiotics [63].
The detection rate of pSLT-mediated virulence genes such as spvB was 71.8% in poultry and 60% in human isolates, and the frequencies may be explained by the spvB gene that is located on virulence plasmids [64]. However, the spvB gene that is present in these isolates is relevant because spv genes are highly associated with strains that cause nontyphoid bacteremia and disseminated infection in humans [17, 65]. In addition, genes related with iron metabolism such as iroN gene that are related to iron acquisition were 97.4% in poultry and 100% in human isolates that were analyzed [66]. Also, the sitC gene is another gene that is related to iron metabolism, and this gene encodes an important transporter of iron [67], and all the isolates carried the gene. Previously, the presence of the spaN gene was reported, but the iroN gene was not associated to bacteria isolated from poultry sources [68]. In the case of S. Heidelberg, the fifteen strains carried the two genes. The significance of iroN gene cluster that is present on the Salmonella isolates is because of the fact that the iron gene that is present represents an adaptation to life at inflamed mucosal surfaces [69]. On the other hand, Webber et al. reported that 88.9% (iroN; 112/126) and 79.4% (sitC; 100/126) of the Salmonella Heidelberg carried the gene [25]. Nevertheless, the presence of the virulence genes does not indicate that the bacteria is pathogenic, it necessarily combined the expression of multiple genes [70]. Finally, we suggest performing other methodologies to confirm the expression of genes or proteins related to virulence factors for a better characterization of each Salmonella strains.
5. Conclusions
An analysis of the virulence genes of Salmonella enterica was conducted to assess its pathogenic potential. In summary, this study provided a better insight into the epidemiology and pathogenicity of Salmonella serovars circulating in two Colombia regions. Also, the presence of virulence genes in different strains of Salmonella isolated from broilers and humans could describe it as bacteria with potential pathogenicity due to the type and number of virulence genes detected. In this way, we recommend active surveillance to have updated information on the pathogenicity of Salmonella enterica strains circulating and preventing outbreaks of Salmonella infection.
Acknowledgments
The authors specially thank the Tolima poultry producers, who have allowed sampling in their farms and identified problems to improve the processes within the companies and productions to provide a better poultry product. This research was funded by the Research Office of the University of Tolima (project number 60130521) and Colciencias (grant number 907-2021).
Data Availability
The data were obtained from the study. Also, all the datasets generated or analyzed during this study are included in this manuscript.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Authors' Contributions
M.P.H.-S. and I.S.R.-B. conceptualized the study,; methodology was given by M.P.H.-S., S.C-M., M.A B-M., and K.J.L.-V.; formal analysis was done by M.P.H.-S. and K.J.L.-V; M.P.H.-S. and K.J.L.-V wrote the original draft; M.P.H.-S., K.J.L.-V., and I.S.R.-B. reviewed and edited the manuscript; M.P.H.-S., K.J.L.-V., and I.S.R.-B. supervised the study; funding acquisition was done by M.P.H.-S. and I.S.R.-B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Rodríguez-Hernández R., Bernal J. F., Cifuentes J. F., et al. Prevalence and molecular characterization of salmonella isolated from broiler farms at the Tolima region—Colombia. Animals . 2021;11(4):p. 970. doi: 10.3390/ani11040970. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Ruiz M. J., Ramallo G., Colello R., et al. Diferentes métodos para aislamiento y detección de Salmonella spp. en canales porcinas. Revista Colombiana de Biotecnología . 2018;20(2):117–123. doi: 10.15446/rev.colomb.biote.v20n2.71680. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Rady M., Ezz-El-Din N. A., Mohamed K. F., Nasef S., Samir A., Elfeil W. K. Correlation between ESβL Salmonella serovars isolated from broilers and their virulence genes. Journal of the Hellenic Veterinary Medical Society . 2020;71(2):2163–2170. doi: 10.12681/jhvms.23645. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Iannetti L., Neri D., Santarelli G. A., et al. Animal welfare and microbiological safety of poultry meat: impact of different at-farm animal welfare levels on at-slaughterhouse Campylobacter and Salmonella contamination. Food Control . 2020;109 doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2019.106921.106921 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Shen Y., Xu L., Li Y. Biosensors for rapid detection of Salmonella in food: a review. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety . 2021;20(1):149–197. doi: 10.1111/1541-4337.12662. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Castro-Vargas R. E., Herrera-Sánchez M. P., Rodríguez-Hernández R., Rondón-Barragán I. S. Antibiotic resistance in Salmonella spp. isolated from poultry: a global overview. Veterinary world . 2020;13(10):2070–2084. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2020.2070-2084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ehuwa O., Jaiswal A. K., Jaiswal S. Salmonella, food safety and food handling practices. Foods . 2021;10(5):p. 907. doi: 10.3390/foods10050907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Younus M., Idrees M. A., Qamur-un-Nisa Q. A., Ahmad W. Pathology and public health significance of Salmonella. Veterinary Pathobiology and Public Health . 2021;289 [Google Scholar]
- 9.Malachowa N., Whitney A. R., Kobayashi S. D., et al. Global changes in staphylococcus aureus gene expression in human blood. PLoS One . 2011;6(4) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0018617.e18617 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Erhardt M., Dersch P. Regulatory principles governing Salmonella and Yersinia virulence. Frontiers in microbiology . 2015;6:p. 949. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00949. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Thung T. Y., Radu S., Mahyudin N. A., et al. Prevalence, virulence genes and antimicrobial resistance profiles of Salmonella serovars from retail beef in Selangor, Malaysia. Frontiers in Microbiology . 2017;8:p. 2697. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Cheng R. A., Eade C. R., Wiedmann M. Embracing diversity: Differences in virulence mechanisms, disease severity, and host adaptations contribute to the success of nontyphoidal salmonellaas a foodborne pathogen. Frontiers in microbiology . 2019;10:p. 1368. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01368. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kombade S., Kaur N. Salmonella spp.-A Global Challenge” En Salmonella spp.-A Global Challenge . London, UK: IntechOpen; 2021. Pathogenicity island in Salmonella. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Al-Khafaji N. S., Al-Bayati A. M., Al-Dahmoshi H. O. Virulence factors of Salmonella typhi” in Salmonella spp. -A global challenge. Intech . 2021 https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/75674 . [Google Scholar]
- 15.Chaudhary J. H., Nayak J. B., Brahmbhatt M. N., Makwana P. P. Virulence genes detection of Salmonella serovars isolated from pork and slaughterhouse environment in Ahmedabad, Gujarat. Veterinary World . 2015;8(1):121–124. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2015.121-124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.McGhie E. J., Brawn L. C., Hume P. J., Humphreys D., Koronakis V. Salmonella takes control: effector-driven manipulation of the host. Current Opinion in Microbiology . 2009;12(1):117–124. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2008.12.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Guiney D. G., Fierer J. The role of the spv genes in Salmonella pathogenesis. Frontiers in microbiology . 2011;2:p. 129. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2011.00129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Humphries A. D., Townsend S. M., Kingsley R. A., Nicholson T. L., Tsolis R. M., Bäumler A. J. Role of fimbriae as antigens and intestinal colonization factors of Salmonella serovars. FEMS Microbiology Letters . 2001;201(2):121–125. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2001.tb10744.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Guiney D. G., Fang F. C., Krause M., Libby S. Plasmid-mediated virulence genes in non-typhoid Salmonella serovars. FEMS microbiology letters . 1994;124(1):1–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1994.tb07253.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Spanò S., Ugalde J. E., Galán J. E. Delivery of a Salmonella typhi exotoxin from a host intracellular compartment. Cell Host & Microbe . 2008;3(1):30–38. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2007.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Mezal E. H., Bae D., Khan A. A. Detection and functionality of the CdtB, PltA, and PltB from Salmonella enterica serovar javiana. Pathogens and disease . 2014;72(2):95–103. doi: 10.1111/2049-632x.12191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Fandiño L. C., Verjan N. A common Salmonella Enteritidis sequence type from poultry and human gastroenteritis in Ibagué, Colombia. Biomedica . 2019;39:50–62. doi: 10.7705/biomedica.v39i1.4155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Rodríguez R., Fandiño C., Donado P., Guzmán L., Verjan N. Characterization of salmonella from commercial egg-laying hen farms in a central region of Colombia. Avian Diseases . 2015;59(1):57–63. doi: 10.1637/10873-052714-reg. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Castro-Var R., Rubio L. F. d., Vega A., Rondon-Bar I. Phenotypic and genotypic resistance of Salmonella Heidelberg isolated from one of the largest poultry production region from Colombia. International Journal of Poultry Science . 2019;18(12):610–617. doi: 10.3923/ijps.2019.610.617. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Webber B., Borges K. A., Furian T. Q., et al. Detection of virulence genes in salmonella heidelberg isolated from chicken carcasses. Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo . 2019;61 doi: 10.1590/S1678-9946201961036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Rodríguez-Hernández R., Herrera-Sánchez M. P., Ortiz-Muñoz J. D., Mora-Rivera C., Rondón-Barragán I. S. Molecular characterization of Salmonella spp. isolates from wild Colombian babilla (Caiman crocodilus fuscus) isolated in situ. Animals . 2022;12(23):p. 3359. doi: 10.3390/ani12233359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.dos Santos A. M. P., Ferrari R. G., Panzenhagen P., Rodrigues G. L., Conte-Junior C. A. Virulence genes identification and characterization revealed the presence of the Yersinia High Pathogenicity Island (HPI) in Salmonella from Brazil. Gene . 2021;787 doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2021.145646.145646 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Baron S., Fons M., Albrecht T. Viral Pathogenesis. Medical Microbiology . 4th. Galveston, TX, USA: University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston; 1996. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.dos Santos A. M. P., Ferrari R. G., Conte-Junior C. A. Virulence Factors in Salmonella Typhimurium: The Sagacity of a Bacterium. Current microbiology . 2019;76:762–773. doi: 10.1007/s00284-018-1510-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Sacristan S., Goss E. M., Eves-Van Den Akker S. How do pathogens evolve novel virulence activities? Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions . 2021;34(6):576–586. doi: 10.1094/mpmi-09-20-0258-ia. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Marcus S. L., Brumell J. H., Pfeifer C. G., Finlay B. B. Salmonella pathogenicity islands: big virulence in small packages. Microbes and Infection . 2000;2(2):145–156. doi: 10.1016/s1286-4579(00)00273-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Edwards R. A., Puente J. L. Fimbrial expression in enteric bacteria: a critical step in intestinal pathogenesis. Trends in Microbiology . 1998;6(7):282–287. doi: 10.1016/s0966-842x(98)01288-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Lejeune P. Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium: cellular and molecular biology. Science . 1988;240(4859):1678–1681. doi: 10.1126/science.240.4859.1678. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Edwards R. A., Schifferli D. M., Maloy S. R. A role for Salmonella fimbriae in intraperitoneal infections. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences . 2000;97(3):1258–1262. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.3.1258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Borges K. A., Furian T. Q., Borsoi A., Moraes H. L. S., Salle C. T. P., Nascimento V. P. Detection of virulence-associated genes in Salmonella Enteritidis isolates from chicken in South of Brazil. Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira . 2013;33(12):1416–1422. doi: 10.1590/s0100-736x2013001200004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Gibson D. L., White A. P., Rajotte C. M., Kay W. W. AgfC and AgfE facilitate extracellular thin aggregative fimbriae synthesis in Salmonella Enteritidis. Microbiology . 2007;153(4):1131–1140. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.2006/000935-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.MacKenzie K. D., Palmer M. B., Köster W. L., White A. P. Examining the link between biofilm formation and the ability of pathogenic Salmonella strains to colonize multiple host species. Frontiers in Veterinary Science . 2017;4:p. 138. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2017.00138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Clouthier S. C., Muller K. H., Doran J. L., Collinson S. K., Kay W. W. Characterization of three fimbrial genes, sefABC, of Salmonella enteritidis. Journal of Bacteriology . 1993;175(9):2523–2533. doi: 10.1128/jb.175.9.2523-2533.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Mendonça E. P., Melo R. T., Oliveira M. R. M., et al. Characteristics of virulence, resistance and genetic diversity of strains of Salmonella Infantis isolated from broiler chicken in Brazil. Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira . 2020;40(1):29–38. doi: 10.1590/1678-5150-pvb-5546. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Skyberg J. A., Logue C. M., Nolan L. K. Virulence gm. Avian Diseases . 2006;50(1):77–81. doi: 10.1637/7417.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Hansen-Wester I., Stecher B., Hensel M. Type III secretion of Salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium translocated effectors and SseFG. Infection and Immunity . 2002;70(3):1403–1409. doi: 10.1128/iai.70.3.1403-1409.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Thomas N. A., Brett Finlay B. Establishing order for type III secretion substrates - a hierarchical process. Trends in Microbiology . 2003;11(8):398–403. doi: 10.1016/s0966-842x(03)00155-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Sripaurya B., Ngasaman R., Benjakul S., Vongkamjan K. Virulence genes and antibiotic resistance of Salmonella recovered from a wet market in Thailand. Journal of Food Safety . 2019;39(2) doi: 10.1111/jfs.12601.e12601 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Borah P., Dutta R., Das L., et al. Prevalence, antimicrobial resistance and virulence genes of Salmonella serovars isolated from humans and animals. Veterinary Research Communications . 2022;46(3):799–810. doi: 10.1007/s11259-022-09900-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Rahn K., De Grandis S. A., Clarke R. C., et al. Amplification of an invA gene sequence of Salmonella typhimurium by polymerase chain reaction as a specific method of detection of Salmonella. Molecular and Cellular Probes . 1992;6(4):271–279. doi: 10.1016/0890-8508(92)90002-f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Ramatla T. A., Mphuthi N., Ramaili T., Taioe M. O., Thekisoe O. M. M., Syakalima M. Molecular detection of virulence genes in Salmonella spp. isolated from chicken faeces in Mafikeng, South Africa. Journal of the South African Veterinary Association . 2020;91:1–7. doi: 10.4102/jsava.v91i0.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Mezal E. H., Sabol A., Khan M. A., Ali N., Stefanova R., Khan A. A. Isolation and molecular characterization of Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis from poultry house and clinical samples during 2010. Food Microbiology . 2014;38:67–74. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2013.08.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Cornelis G. R. The type III secretion injectisome. Nature Reviews Microbiology . 2006;4(11):811–825. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1526. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Winnen B., Schlumberger M. C., Sturm A., et al. Hierarchical effector protein transport by the Salmonella typhimurium SPI-1 Type III secretion system. PLoS One . 2008;3(5) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002178.e2178 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Streckel W., Wolff A. C., Prager R., Tietze E., Tschäpe H. Expression profiles of effector proteins SopB, SopD1, SopE1, and AvrA differ with systemic, enteric, and epidemic strains of Salmonella enterica. Molecular Nutrition & Food Research . 2004;48(7):496–503. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.200400035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Wallis T. S., Galyov E. E. Molecular basis of salmonella-induced enteritis. MicroReview. Molecular microbiology . 2000;36(5):997–1005. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2000.01892.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Guttman J. A., Finlay B. B. Subcellular alterations that lead to diarrhea during bacterial pathogenesis. Trends in Microbiology . 2008;16(11):535–542. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2008.08.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Parkhill J., Dougan G., James K. D., et al. Complete genome sequence of a multiple drug resistant Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi CT18. Nature . 2001;413(6858):848–852. doi: 10.1038/35101607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Kingsley R. A., Bäumler A. J. Host adaptation and the emergence of infectious disease: the Salmonella paradigm. Molecular Microbiology . 2000;36(5):1006–1014. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2000.01907.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Lu R., Liu X., Wu S., et al. Consistent activation of the β-catenin pathway by Salmonella type-three secretion effector protein AvrA in chronically infected intestine. American Journal of Physiology - Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology . 2012;303(10):G1113–G1125. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00453.2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Du F., Galán J. E. Selective inhibition of type III secretion activated signaling by the Salmonella effector AvrA. PLoS Pathogens . 2009;5(9) doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000595.1000595 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Jones R. M., Wu H., Wentworth C., Luo L., Collier-Hyams L., Neish A. S. Salmonella AvrA coordinates suppression of host immune and apoptotic defenses via JNK pathway blockade. Cell Host & Microbe . 2008;3(4):233–244. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2008.02.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Liao A. P., Petrof E. O., Kuppireddi S., et al. Salmonella type III effector AvrA stabilizes cell tight junctions to inhibit inflammation in intestinal epithelial cells. PLoS One . 2008;3(6):p. e2369. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Bahramianfard H., Derakhshandeh A., Naziri Z., Khaltabadi Farahani R. Prevalence, virulence factor and antimicrobial resistance analysis of Salmonella Enteritidis from poultry and egg samples in Iran. BMC Veterinary Research . 2021;17(1):p. 196. doi: 10.1186/s12917-021-02900-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Lu J., Li L., Fan F., et al. PagC is involved in salmonella pullorum OMVs production and affects biofilm production. Veterinary Microbiology . 2020;247 doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2020.108778.108778 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Abdullahi U. F., Igwenagu E., Mu’azu A., Aliyu S., Umar M. I. Intrigues of biofilm: a perspective in veterinary medicine. Veterinary World . 2016;9(1):12–18. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2016.12-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Steenackers H., Hermans K., Vanderleyden J., De Keersmaecker S. C. J. Salmonella biofilms: an overview on occurrence, structure, regulation and eradication. Food Research International . 2012;45(2):502–531. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2011.01.038. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Horiyama T., Yamaguchi A., Nishino K. TolC dependency of multidrug efflux systems in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy . 2010;65(7):1372–1376. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkq160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Zhang D., Zhuang L., Wang C., et al. Virulence gene distribution of Salmonella pullorum isolates recovered from chickens in China. Avian Diseases . 2018;62(4):431–436. doi: 10.1637/11927-071318-resnote.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Guiney D. G., Fang F. C., Krause M., Libby S., Buchmeier N. A., Fierer J. Biology and clinical significance of virulence plasmids in salmonella serovars. Clinical infectious diseases . 1995;21(2):S146–S151. doi: 10.1093/clinids/21.Supplement_2.S146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Bäumler A. J., Norris T. L., Lasco T., et al. IroN, a novel outer membrane siderophore receptor characteristic of Salmonella enterica. Journal of Bacteriology . 1998;180(6):1446–1453. doi: 10.1128/jb.180.6.1446-1453.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Ed-Dra A., Filali F. R., Khayi S., et al. Antimicrobial resistance, virulence genes, and genetic diversity of Salmonella enterica isolated from sausages. European Journal of Microbiology and Immunology . 2019;9(2):56–61. doi: 10.1556/1886.2018.00035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Borges K. A., Furian T. Q., Souza S. N., Salle C. T. P., Moraes H. L. S., Nascimento V. P. Antimicrobial resistance and molecular characterization of salmonella enterica serotypes isolated from poultry sources in Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science . 2019;21(1) doi: 10.1590/1806-9061-2018-0827. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Raffatellu M., George M. D., Akiyama Y., et al. Lipocalin-2 resistance confers an advantage to Salmonella enterica serotype typhimurium for growth and survival in the inflamed intestine. Cell Host and Microbe . 2009;5(5):476–486. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2009.03.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Xia Y., Li H., Shen Y. Antimicrobial drug resistance in Salmonella enteritidis isolated from edible snakes with pneumonia and its pathogenicity in chickens. Frontiers in Veterinary Science . 2020;7:p. 463. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The data were obtained from the study. Also, all the datasets generated or analyzed during this study are included in this manuscript.
