Skip to main content
Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology logoLink to Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology
. 2022 Dec 26;33(2):211–218. doi: 10.4014/jmb.2209.09024

Construction of a Novel Shuttle Vector for Tetragenococcus species based on a Cryptic Plasmid from Tetragenococcus halophilus

Min Jae Kim 1, Tae Jin Kim 1, Yun Ji Kang 1, Ji Yeon Yoo 1, Jeong Hwan Kim 1,2,*
PMCID: PMC9998201  PMID: 36575862

Abstract

A cryptic plasmid (pTH32) was characterized from Tetragenococcus halophilus 32, an isolate from jeotgal, Korean traditional fermented seafood. pTH32 is 3,198 bp in size with G+C content of 35.84%, and contains 4 open reading frames (ORFs). orf1 and orf2 are 456 bp and 273 bp in size, respectively, and their translation products showed 65.16% and 69.35% similarities with RepB family plasmid replication initiators, respectively, suggesting the rolling-circle replication (RCR) mode of pTH32. orf3 and orf4 encodes putative hypothetical protein of 186 and 76 amino acids, respectively. A novel Tetragenococcus-Escherichia coli shuttle vector, pMJ32E (7.3 kb, Emr), was constructed by ligation of pTH32 with pBluescript II KS(+) and an erythromycin resistance gene (ErmC). pMJ32E successfully replicated in Enterococcus faecalis 29212 and T. halophilus 31 but not in other LAB species. A pepA gene, encoding aminopeptidase A (PepA) from T. halophilus CY54, was successfully expressed in T. halophilus 31 using pMJ32E. The transformant (TF) showed higher PepA activity (49.8 U/mg protein) than T. halophilus 31 cell (control). When T. halophilus 31 TF was subculturd in MRS broth without antibiotic at 48 h intervals, 53.8% of cells retained pMJ32E after 96 h, and only 2.4% of cells retained pMJ32E after 14 days, supporting the RCR mode of pTH32. pMJ32E could be useful for the genetic engineering of Tetragenococcus and Enterococcus species.

Keywords: Tetragenococcus halophilus, pMJ32E, shuttle vector, RCR plasmid

Introduction

Tetragenococcus species (sp.) are halophilic lactic acid bacteria (LAB) showing the optimum growth in culture medium with 5-10% NaCl, and some species can grow up to 20% NaCl [1]. Tetragenococcus species have been isolated from fermented foods with high salinities such as doenjang, fish sauce, jeotgal, and soy sauce [2-5]. T. halophilus, the most well-known species, was previously known as Pediococcus halophilus, and reclassified as T. halophilus based on 16S rRNA sequence comparisons with other closely related LAB [6]. To date, 5 species are known and they are T. halophilus, T. muriaticus, T. koreensis, T. soliatarius, and T. osmophilus [7]. Due to their halophilic nature, Tetragenococcus species get interests as starters for fermented foods with high salinities such as jeotgal and fish sauce [1, 8]. But studies on the genetics and genetic engineering of tetregenococci are still limited.

Plasmids from LAB such as Lactobacillus, Leuconostoc, and Weissella genera have been used as the frames for cloning vectors intended for the introduction and expression of genes in LAB [9-11]. However, few studies have been conducted on the plasmids from Tetragenococcus species, and few vectors have been constructed based on the plasmids from Tetragenococcus species. Construction of cloning vectors for Tetragenococcus species will be helpful not only for the basic studies on the genetics of Tetragenococcus species but also for the genetic engineering of Tetragenococcus species. A 8.7 kb cryptic plasmid (pUCL287) from T. halophilus ATCC33315 was characterized and used for vector construction. pUCL287 is replicating via theta-mode and its minimal replicon locates at a 1.2 kb fragment [12, 13]. E. coli - Tetragenococcus shuttle vectors were constructed based on the 1.2 kb minimal replicon of pUCL287 and pUC19 [14]. A cloning vector for LAB (pUBU) was constructed by using the 1.2 kb fragment as a replicon, and pUBU successfully replicated in several LAB genera with the transformation efficiencies of 103 TFs/μg DNA [15].

In this study, a small cryptic plasmid, pTH32, was characterized from T. halophilus 32. T. halophilus 32 was isolated from jeotgal, Korean traditional fermented seafood. A new shuttle vector pMJ32E was constructed based on pTH32 and pBluescript II(+). pMJ32E successfully replicated in Enterococcus faecalis 29212 and Tetragenococcus halophilus 31. The result indicated that pMJ32E could be useful for the genetic engineering of Tetragenococcus and Enterococcus species. pMJ32E is a valuable addition to existing cloning vectors for LAB.

Materials and Methods

Bacterial Strains, Plasmids and Culture Conditions

Bacterial strains and plasmids used in this work are listed in Table 1. Tetragenococcus species were cultivated in lactobacilli MRS broth (Acumedia, USA) or agar (1.5%, w/v) containing NaCl (5%, w/v) under anaerobic conditions at 30°C. Enterococcus, Lactobacillus, Lactococcus and Weissella species were cultivated in the same media without NaCl. Escherichia coli DH5α was cultivated in Luria-Bertani (LB, Acumedia, USA) medium at 37°C with aeration. The following antibiotics were added to the media as selective agents when required: ampicillin (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) (100 μg/ml for E. coli) and erythromycin (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) (200 μg/ml for E. coli, 50 μg/ml for Enterococcus and Tetragenococcus, 5 μg/ml for Lactobacillus, Lactococcus, and Weissella strains).

Table 1.

Bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study.

Bacteria and plasmids Description Reference
Escherichia coli DH5α F− φ80lacZΔM15 Δ(lacZYA-argF)U169 recA1 endA1 hsdR17(rk, mk+) phoA supE44 thi-1 gyrA96 relA1 λ Gibco BRL
Tetragenococcus halophilus 31 Transformation host Kyonggi university
Tetragenococcus halophilus 32 Source of pTH32 native plasmid Kyonggi university
Enterococcus faecalis 29212 Lab strain, transformation host This study
Lactobacillus brevis 2.14 Sak Imm, indicator strain for Sakacin A [16]
Lactobacillus plantarum KCTC3104 Transformation host [17]
Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris MG1363 Lac,Gal, plasmid-free and prophage-cured derivative of NCDO712 [18]
Weissella confusa CB1 Lab strain, transformation host [17]
Plasmid
pBluescript II KS (+) E. coli cloning vector, 2.96 kb, Apr , lacZ Stratagene
pTH32 cryptic plasmid from T. halophilus 32, 3.2 kb This study
pSJE E. coliLeuconostoc shuttle vector, 6.6 kb, Emr [10]
pJY33E E. coliWeissella shuttle vector, 6.5 kb, Apr, Emr [11]
pUCTH32L pUC19:: 2.2 kb EcoRI-HindIII fragment from pTH32, 4.9 kb, Apr This study
pUCTH32S pUC19:: 1 kb EcoRI-HindIII fragment from pTH32, 3.7 kb, Apr This study
pMJ32 pBluescript II KS (+):: 3.2 kb HindIII digested pTH32, 6.2 kb, Apr This study
pMJ32E pMJ32:: 1.2 kb emrC from pJY33E, 7.3 kb, Apr, Emr This study
pMJ32EpepA pMJ32E:: 2.6 kb pepA from T. halophilus CY54 chromosomal DNA, 10 kb, Apr, Emr This study

DNA Manipulations

Plasmid DNA was prepared from LAB by the method of O’Sullivan and Klaenhammer [19] and from E. coli DH5α using a commercial kit (FavorPrep plasmid extraction mini kit, Favorgen, Vienna, Austria). Restriction enzymes, T4 DNA ligase, and alkaline phosphatase (Promega, USA) were used according to the protocols provided by the suppliers. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplifications were carried out with 10 to 100 ng DNA template and 10 pmol primers using Ex Taq DNA polymerase (Takara, Japan). Plasmid DNA and PCR amplicons were verified by agarose gels electrophoresis, stained with EcoDye DNA staining solution (Biofact, Korea) and visualized under UV light.

DNA Sequence Analysis

pTH32 was digested with EcoRI and HindIII, and the resulting two fragments were individually cloned into pUC19. The nucleotide sequences of 2 fragments were determined by using M13 fwd (5′- GTTTTCCCAGTC ACGAC -3′) and M13 rev (5′- GCGGATAACAATTTCACACAG-3′) universal primers. The internal region of a larger fragment was sequenced by using pUCB-F (5′-ACAAGGCTTTGCAAGCCCAACGCA-3′) and pUCB-R (5′-ACAAACGGTTACGGGCTGCGTCAA-3′) primers. DNA sequencing was performed at Cosmogenetech (Korea). Analysis of the DNA sequence was performed primarily using the BLAST (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi) and GenBank database. Open reading frame (ORF) prediction was performed using the ORF finder (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gorf/gorf.html). Promoter sequences were predicted using the ‘‘Neural Network Promoter Prediction’’ program of the University of Berkeley (http://www.fruitfly.org/seq_tools/promoter.html). Direct repeats and inverted repeats were predicted using Novoprolabs Repeats Finder for DNA/Protein Sequences (https://www.novoprolabs.com/tools/repeats-sequences-finder).

Construction of pMJ32E and Transformation of LAB and E. coli DH5α with pMJ32E

pTH32 was digested with HindIII and then ligated with pBluescript II KS(+) (Stratagene, USA). The recombinant (pMJ32) was obtained. Erythromycin resistance gene (ermC) was PCR amplified from pJY33E by using primer pair: ErmC-F (5′- CCCTCTAGACTTATCGGATAATAA-3′, XbaI site underlined) and ErmC-R (5′-GGGGGATCCACAAAAAATAGGCAC-3′, BamHI site underlined) [11]. The amplified ermC was inserted into pMJ32 at XbaI and BamHI sites.

E. coli DH5α competent cells were prepared and transformed by standard protocols [20]. The plasmid DNA and E. coli competent cells were mixed, kept on ice for 1 min and transferred to a 0.1 cm electroporation cuvette. Electroporation was performed with a Gene Pulser II (BioRad, USA) under the following conditions: peak voltage, 2.1 kV; capacitance, 25 μF; resistance, 200 Ω. After pulsing, cells were resuspended in 1 ml of LB broth, incubated for 1 h at 37°C, and spreaded onto LB plates containing antibiotics. Competent cells of Lactobacillus plantarum KCTC3104, Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris MG1363, and Weissella confusa CB1 were prepared and transformed according to a previous report [21]. Competent cells of Enterococcus and Tetragenococcus genera were prepared and transformed according to a previous report [22].

Expression of pepA from T. halophilus CY54

A pepA gene encoding aminopeptidase A (PepA) was PCR amplified from T. halophilus CY54 chromosomal DNA by using pepA-F (5′-CCCGTCGACTGCTGCTTCATAATG-3′, SalI site underlined) and pepA-R (5′-TTTCTCGAGCTGGCAACCTCAATC-3′, XhoI site underlined) primers [23]. The PCR amplified pepA was 2.6 kb in size, including its own promoter, and inserted into pMJ32E at SalI and XhoI sites. The resulting pMJ32EpepA was introduced into T. halophilus 31 and E. coli DH5α by electroporation, respectively. T. halophilus 31 and E. coli DH5α transformants (TFs) carrying pMJ32EpepA were grown in MRS broth (with 5% NaCl) and LB broth, respectively. Cells were harvested at the end of logarithmic growth phase by centrifugation (5,000 ×g for 15 min at 4°C), washed 3 times with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and resuspended in PBS. T. halophilus cells resuspended in PBS with lysozyme (10 mg/ml) were incubated for 1 h at 37°C before subjected to ultrasonication (Bandelin Electronic, Berlin, Germany). E. coli cells were disrupted by ultrasonication without lysozyme pretreatment. Disrupted cells were centrifuged at 12,000 ×g for 15 min at 4°C, and the supernatants were used as the cell extracts for PepA activity measurements. The protein concentration of the cell extract was determined by the Bradford method [24]. PepA activities in the cell extracts were measured according to previous report using glutamyl p-nitroanilide (glu-pNA) as the substrate [25]. One unit (U) of PepA was defined as the amout of enzyme that released 1 nmol of p-nitroaniline per minute under the assay conditions.

Stability of pMJ32E in T. halophilus 31

Stability of pMJ32E was examined by a method as described previously [10]. T. halophilus 31 TFs harbouring pMJ32E were grown in MRS broth with NaCl (5%) and erythromycin (Em, 50 μg/ml) for 48 h at 30°C. Then the culture was used to inoculate (1%, v/v) fresh MRS broth containing NaCl (5%) but no Em, and the inoculated culture was incubated for 48 h at 30°C. Subculturing was repeated up to 7 times without Em selection. Aliquots of each culture were spreaded onto MRS plates containing NaCl (5%) only and MRS plates containing NaCl (5%) and Em (50 μg/ml), respectively. The percentage of cells harboring pMJ32E was calculated by dividing the number of cells on MRS plates with Em by the number of cells on MRS plates without Em, and multiplied by 100.

Nucleotide Sequence

The complete nucleotide sequence of pTH32 was deposited to GenBank with the accession number MZ687077.

Results and Discussion

Characterization of pTH32

T. halophillus 32 was one of the isolates from jeotgal products, Korean traditional fermented seafoods by professor Lee group at Kyonggi university, Korea and kindly provided for this work. T. halophillus 32 possesses a small-sized plasmid, pTH32. Due to the small size, pTH32 was chosen as the frame for a TetragenococcusE. coli shuttle vector. pTH32 was digested with several restriction enzymes and it was found that pTH32 had a single recognition site for EcoRI, HindIII, NdeI, and NcoI. When pTH32 was double digested with EcoRI and HindIII, 2.2 and 1.0 kb fragments were generated. Each fragment was cloned into pUC19, resulting in pUCTH32L (pUC19 with 2.2 kb fragment) and pUCTH32S (pUC19 with 1.0 kb insert). The nucleotide sequences of the inserts were determined and combined into one sequence. pTH32 was 3,198 bp in length, and the G+C content was 35.84%, and it was within the known range of G+C contents of Tetragenococcus species [26].

Sequence analysis revealed the presence of 4 ORFs, 6 palindromic sequences (inverted repeat, IR I–VI), and 5 direct repeats (DR I–V) (Fig. 1). DRs and IRs observed in many plasmids are involved in the regulation of the replication processes of plasmids [27]. Many DRs and IRs are present upstream of orf1, the region where regulation of replication processes is expected to occur. orf1 can potentially encode a protein of 151 amino acids showing 65.16% sequence similarity with a RepB family plasmid replication initiator protein from Enterococcus faecium (WP_159373655.1). orf2 can potentially encode a protein of 90 amino acids showing 69.35% sequence similarity with a RepB family plasmid replication initiator protein from Staphylococcus aureus (WP_224670973.1). RepB proteins are known to have nicking-closing (topoisomerase I-like) activities for supercoiled DNA and are found among rolling circle replicating (RCR) plasmids [28]. orf1 and orf2 might form an operon since the distance between the end of ORF1 and the start of ORF2 is close, 62 nucleotides. Possible promoter sequences (-35 and -10) are located upstream of orf1 (underlined in Fig. 1). IRII located immediate downstream of ORF2 might serve as a transcription terminator. It can form an hairpin-loop structure with the free energy of -15.86 kcal/mol as determined by mfold program (http://www.unafold.org/mfold/applications/dna-folding-form.php).

Fig. 1. Nucleotide sequence of pTH32.

Fig. 1

The dotted arrow indicates inverted repeats (IRI-IRVI) shown above the corresponding sequences and the solid arrow indicates direct repeats (DRI-DRV) shown above the corresponding sequences. RBS (ribosome binding site) and putative promoter sequences (-35 and -10) are underlined. Amino acid sequence of ORFs are shown as a single letter under the corresponding nucleotide sequences.

orf3 can potentially encode a protein of 185 amino acids showing 98.38% sequence similarity with a hypothetical protein from T. halophilus (WP_012478268.1). orf4 can potentially encode a protein of 74 amino acids showing 69.44% sequence similarity with a hypothetical protein from T. halophilus (WP_176446071.1). The functions of hypothetical proteins are unknown because they do not show any significant homologies to known proteins in the database. Considering the small size and significant homologies with RepB proteins, pTH32 was expected to replicate via RCR mode.

Construction of pMJ32E and Transformation of LAB

A Tetragenococcus - E. coli shuttle vector, pMJ32E, was constructed as described above (Fig. 2). Transformation of several LAB genera was tried with pMJ32E. pMJ32E successfully replicated in Enterococcus faecalis 29212 and Tetragenoccus halophilus 31. Transformation efficiency was 1.2 × 102 and 1.1 × 101 CFU/μg DNA for E. faecalis 29212 and T. halophilus 31, respectively. These efficiencies were lower than those reported for vectors based on pUCL287 replicon, which were in the range of 1.14 × 103 – 2.1 × 104 CFU/μg plasmid [14, 15]. T. halophilus 31 was isolated from jeotgal together with T. halophilus 32, and T. halophilus 31 harbors a 5 kb plasmid (results not shown). Among the several Tetragenococcus species tested, T. halophiluds 31 was the only strain transformed by pMJ32E. Transformation efficiency for T. halophilus 31 was quite low, but it could be improved if efforts to optimize the transformation conditions are tried. pMJ32E seems to have narrow host range since other LAB genera were not transformed with pMJ32E. Another possibility is that transformation of other LAB genera with pMJ32E might be more difficult compared with Tetragenococcus and other closely related LAB such as Enterococcus. More studies are necessary to clarify this issue.

Fig. 2. Schematic presentation of pMJ32E construction.

Fig. 2

pTH32 was digested with HindIII and ligated with pBluescript II KS(+), resulting in pMJ32. pMJ32 was double digested using XbaI and BamHI and ligated with a 1.2 kb emrC fragment from pJY33E, resulting in pMJ32E.

Expression of pepA from T. halophilus CY54 in T. halophilus 31

To test the potential of pMJ32E as a cloning vector for Tetragenococcus species, expression of pepA gene in a heterologous host was tried. pMJ32EpepA was constructed as described above (Fig. 2). T. halophilus 31 [pMJ32EpepA] showed PepA activity of 49.8 U/mg protein, which was much higher than 9.1 U/mg protein of T. halophilus 31 harboring intact pMJ32E (control). E. faecalis 29212 [pMJ32EpepA] showed PepA activity of 39.2 U/mg protein, which was much higher than 20.2 U/mg protein of E. faecalis 29212 harboring intact pMJ32E (control). E. coli DH5α [pMJ32EpepA] showed PepA activity of 380 U/mg protein, which was also higher than 94 U/mg protein of E. coli DH5α harboring pMJ32E (control) (Table 2). The results proved the usefulness of pMJ32E as a cloning vector for T. halophilus and E. faecalis.

Table 2.

Aminopeptidase A activities of E. coli, T. halophilus and E. faecalis TFs.

Strains Total activity (U/mg protein)
E. coli DH5α [pMJ32E] 94
E. coli DH5α [pMJ32EpepA] 380
T. halophilus 31 [pMJ32E] 9.1
T. halophilus 31 [pMJ32EpepA] 49.8
E. faecalis 29212 [pMJ32E] 20.2
E. faecalis 29212 [pMJ32EpepA] 39.2

Stability of pMJ32E in T. halophilus 31

The segregational stability of pMJ32E in T. halophilus 31 was monitored under the absence of Em selection (Fig. 3). After the first 28 generations, 53.8% cells retained pMJ32E and the portion of cells which lost pMJ32E increased rapidly thereafter. After 100 generations, only 2.4% of the cells still retained pMJ32E. The results are comparable to those observed among many RCR-type plasmids. RCR plasmids usually have low segregational stabilities due to the accumulation of ssDNA intermediates [27]. Theta type plasmids, which do not produce ssDNA intermediates, are more stable than RCR plasmids [27]. For example, a shuttle vector pFBYC018E based on a RCR plasmid (pFR18) showed just 3% stability after 100 generations [29]. pL11 based on another RCR plasmid (pSMA23) showed 2% and 6% stability in Lb. casei and Lb. gasseri, respectively, after 210 generations [30]. Whereas pSJ33E, a theta-replicating plasmid from Leuconostoc mesenteroides SY2, was maintained 100% in L. mesenteroides SY1 after 100 generations [10]. A shuttle vector, pRCEID-LC7.6, constructed by ligation of a theta replicating plasmid from Lactobacillus casei with pUC19 showed 16% stability in L. casei RCEID02 after 200 generations [31]. The segregational stability of pMJ32E in T. halophilus 31 was lower than those of theta-replicating vectors but similar to those of RCR plasmids, supporting the rolling circle replication of pMJ32E.

Fig. 3. Stability of pMJ32E in T. halophilus 31 during extended growth in MRS broth with 5% NaCl but without Em.

Fig. 3

The copy number of pMJ32E in T. halophilus 31 was qualitatively compared with those of pSJE (a theta-type plasmid) in Levilavtobacillus brevis 2.14 [10] and pJY33E (a RCR-plasmid) in L. brevis 2.14 [11]. Three cultures were grown in MRS broth (10 ml) under the same conditions. When the OD600 reached 0.6, plasmid DNA was prepared and dissolved in 40 μl distilled water. The same amount of DNA samples (5 μl) were analyzed by agarose gel electrophoresis and stained with ethidium bromide (Fig. 4). The results indicated that the copy number of pMJ32E was similar with those of pSJE and pJY33E.

Fig. 4. Comparison of the copy number of pMJ32E with other vectors.

Fig. 4

M, iVDye 1kb DNA ladder (GenDEPOT, USA); 1, pMJ32E isolated from T. halophilus 31; 2, pSJE isolated from Levilavtobacillus brevis 2.14; 3, pJY33E isolated from Levilavtobacillus brevis 2.14.

A small cryptic plasmid, pTH32, was isolated from T. halophilus 32 and characterized. A novel E. coliTetragenococcus shuttle vector, pMJ33E, was constructed based on pTH32. pMJ32E successfully replicated in T. halophilus 31 and E. faecalis 29212. But no TFs were obtained for other LAB genera, which might be due to the narrow host range of pTH32 or failure to find optimum transformation conditions. A pepA gene from T. halophilus CY54 was successfully expressed in a heterologous host, T. halophilus 31 and En. faecalis 29212 by using pMJ32E, and high level of PepA activity was observed in a TF. The result showed that pMJ32E could be useful for genetic engineering of Tetragenococcus and Enterococcus species.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (No. NRF-2020R1A2C100826711). Kim MJ, Kim TJ, Kang YJ, and Yoo JY have been supported by BK21 four program from MOE, Korea. T. halophilus 31 and 32 strains were kindly provided by professor Lee, Jong-Hoon at Kyonggi University, Korea.

Footnotes

Conflict of Interest

The authors have no financial conflicits of interests to declare.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Kim KH, Lee SH, Chun BH, Jeong SE, Jeon CO. Tetragenococcus halophilus MJ4 as a starter culture for repressing biogenic amine (cadaverine) formation during saeu-jeot (salted shrimp) fermentation. Food Microbiol. 2019;82:465–473. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2019.02.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Jeong DW, Heo S, Lee JH. Safety assessment of Tetragenococcus halophilus isolates from doenjang, a Korean high-saltfermented soybean paste. Food Microbiol. 2017;62:92–98. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2016.10.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Udomsil N, Rodtong S, Tanasupawat S, Yongsawatdigul J. Proteinase-producing halophilic lactic acid bacteria isolated from fish sauce fermentation and their ability to produce volatile compounds. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2010;141:186–194. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.05.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kim JA, Yao Z, Perumal V, Kim HJ, Kim JH. Properties of Tetragenococcus halophilus strains isolated from myeolchi (anchovy)-jeotgal. Microbiol. Biotechnol. Lett. 2018;46:313–319. doi: 10.4014/mbl.1804.04016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Tanasupawat S, Thongsanit J, Okada S, Komagata K. Lactic acid bacteria isolated from soy sauce mash in Thailand. J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol. 2002;48:201–209. doi: 10.2323/jgam.48.201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Collins MD, Williams AM, Wallbanks S. The phylogeny of Aerococcus and Pediococcus as determined by 16S rRNA sequence analysis: description of Tetragenococcus gen. nov. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 1990;70:255–262. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1990.tb14006.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Justé A, Van Trappen S, Verreth C, Cleenwerck I, De Vos, Lievens B, Willems KA. Characterization of Tetragenococcus strains from sugar thick juice reveals a novel species, Tetragenococcus osmophilus sp. nov., and divides Tetragenococcus halophilus into two subspecies, T. halophilus subsp. halophilus subsp. nov. and T. halophilus subsp. flandriensis subsp. nov. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2012;62:129–137. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.029157-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Udomsil N, Rodtong S, Choi YJ, Hua Y, Yongsawatdigul J. Use of Tetragenococcus halophilus as a starter culture for flavor improvement in fish sauce fermentation. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2011;59:8401–8408. doi: 10.1021/jf201953v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lee JH, Halgerson JS, Kim JH, O'Sullivan DJ. Comparative sequence analysis of plasmids from Lactobacillus delbrueckii and construction of a shuttle cloning vector. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2007;73:4417–4424. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00099-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Jeong SJ, Park JY, Lee HJ, Kim JH. Characterization of pFMBL1, a small cryptic plasmid isolated from Leuconostoc mesenteroides SY2. Plasmid. 2007;57:314–323. doi: 10.1016/j.plasmid.2006.09.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Park JY, Jeong SJ, Sa HD, Lee JY, Liu X, Cho MJ, et al. Construction of a shuttle vector based on the small cryptic plasmid pJY33 from Weissella cibaria 33. Plasmid. 2015;79:30–36. doi: 10.1016/j.plasmid.2015.03.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Benachour A, Frère J, Boutibonnes P, Auffray Y. Characterization and replication mode determination of the minimal replicon of Tetragenococcus halophilus ATCC33315 plasmid pUCL287. Biochimie. 1995;77:868–874. doi: 10.1016/0300-9084(95)90005-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Benachour A, Frère J, Flahaut S, Novel G, Auffray Y. Molecular analysis of the replication region of the theta-replicating plasmid pUCL287 from Tetragenococcus (Pediococcus) halophilus ATCC33315. Mol. Gen. Genet. 1997;255:504–513. doi: 10.1007/s004380050523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Benachour A, Auffray Y, Hartke A. Construction of plasmid vectors for screening replicons from gram-positive bacteria and their use as shuttle cloning vectors. Curr. Microbiol. 2007;54:342–347. doi: 10.1007/s00284-006-0358-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Phumkhachorn P, Rattanachaikunsopon P. A broad host range food-grade cloning vector for lactic acid bacteria. Biologia. 2016;71:457–463. doi: 10.1515/biolog-2016-0064. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Axelsson L, Holck A, Birkeland S, Aukrust T, Blom H. Cloning and nucleotide sequence of a gene from Lactobacillus sake Lb706 necessary for sakacin A production and immunity. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1993;59:2868–2875. doi: 10.1128/aem.59.9.2868-2875.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Eom HJ, Moon JS, Cho SK, Kim JH, Han NS. Construction of theta-type shuttle vector for Leuconostoc and other lactic acid bacteria using pCB42 isolated from kimchi. Plasmid. 2012;67:35–43. doi: 10.1016/j.plasmid.2011.11.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Gasson MJ. Plasmid complements of Streptococcus lactis NCDO 712 and other lactic streptococci after protoplast-induced curing. J. Bacteriol. 1983;154:1–9. doi: 10.1128/jb.154.1.1-9.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.O'Sullivan DJ, Klaenhammer TR. Rapid mini-prep isolation of high-quality plasmid DNA from Lactococcus and Lactobacillus spp. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1993;59:2730–2733. doi: 10.1128/aem.59.8.2730-2733.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Sambrook JF, Russell DW. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. 3rd Ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; New York, USA: 2001. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Berthier F, Zagorec M, Champomier-Vergès M, Ehrlich SD, Morel-Deville F. Efficient transformation of Lactobacillus sake by electroporation. Microbiology. 1996;142:1273–1279. doi: 10.1099/13500872-142-5-1273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Jin Q, Eom HJ, Jung JY, Moon JS, Kim JH, Han NS. Optimization of electrotransformation conditions for Leuconostoc mesenteroides subsp. mesenteroides ATCC8293. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2012;55:314–321. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2012.03300.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Jeong DW, Heo S, Kim TJ, Kim JH. Complete genome sequence of Tetragenococcus halophilus CY54 showing protease and aminopeptidase activity. Kor. J. Microbiol. 2021;57:223–225. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Bradford MM. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 1976;72:248–254. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Magboul AA, McSweeney PL. Purification and characterization of an aminopeptidase from Lactobacillus curvatus DPC2024. Int. Dairy J. 1999;9:107–116. doi: 10.1016/S0958-6946(99)00029-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Chun BH, Han DM, Kim KH, Jeong SE, Park D, Jeon CO. Genomic and metabolic features of Tetragenococcus halophilus as revealed by pan-genome and transcriptome analyses. Food Microbiol. 2019;83:36–47. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2019.04.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Shareck J, Choi Y, Lee B, Miguez CB. Cloning vectors based on cryptic plasmids isolated from lactic acid bacteria: their characteristics and potential applications in biotechnology. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2004;24:155–208. doi: 10.1080/07388550490904288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Moscoso M, Eritja R, Espinosa M. Initiation of replication of plasmid pMV158: mechanisms of DNA strand-transfer reactions mediated by the initiator RepB protein. J. Mol. Biol. 1997;268:840–856. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1997.1012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Biet F, Cenatiempo Y, Fremaux C. Characterization of pFR18, a small cryptic plasmid from Leuconostoc mesenteroides ssp. mesenteroides FR52, and its use as a food grade vector. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 1999;179:375–383. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1999.tb08752.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Sudhamani M, Ismaiel E, Geis A, Batish V, Heller KJ. Characterisation of pSMA23, a 3.5 kbp plasmid of Lactobacillus casei, and application for heterologous expression in Lactobacillus. Plasmid. 2008;59:11–19. doi: 10.1016/j.plasmid.2007.09.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Suebwongsa N, Lulitanond V, Mayo B, Yotpanya P, Panya M. Development of an Escherichia coli-Lactobacillus casei shuttle vector for heterologous protein expression in Lactobacillus casei. Springerplus. 2016;5:169. doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-1760-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology are provided here courtesy of Korean Society for Microbiology and Biotechnology

RESOURCES