Skip to main content
Springer logoLink to Springer
. 2023 Feb 27;61(2):159–173. doi: 10.1007/s12275-023-00015-x

The Revision of Lichen Flora Around Maxwell Bay, King George Island, Maritime Antarctic

Jae Eun So 1,2, Josef P Halda 3, Soon Gyu Hong 1,2, Jae-Seoun Hur 4, Ji Hee Kim 1,
PMCID: PMC9998320  PMID: 36847971

Abstract

Since the floristic study of lichens at the Barton and Weaver Peninsulas of King George Island in 2006, there have been intense investigations of the lichen flora of the two peninsulas as well as that of Fildes Peninsula and Ardley Island in Maxwell Bay, King George Island, South Shetland Islands, maritime Antarctic. In this study, a total of 104 species belonging to 53 genera, are identified from investigations of lichens that were collected in austral summer seasons from 2008 to 2016. Phenotypic and molecular analyses were incorporated for taxonomic identification. In particular, 31 species are found to be endemic to the Antarctic and 22 species are newly recorded to the Maxwell Bay region. Lepra dactylina, Stereocaulon caespitosum, and Wahlenbergiella striatula are newly recorded in the Antarctic, and the previously reported taxon Cladonia furcata is excluded from the formerly recorded list due to misidentification. We also provide ecological and geographical information about lichen associations and habitat preferences.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12275-023-00015-x.

Keywords: Lichen, Lichen taxonomy, Antarctic lichen diversity, Ecological traits

Introduction

Lichens are symbiotic organisms that are composed of lichenized fungi (mycobiont) and microalgae and/or cyanobacteria (photobiont). They have successfully adapted to severe environmental conditions that prevail in tropical, desert, high alpine, and polar regions. Lichens usually inhabit ice-free areas (Singh et al., 2018; Smith, 1988), and they are the main vegetation in the Antarctic terrestrial ecosystems along with two vascular plants, Deschampsia antarctica Desv. and Colobanthus quitensis (Kunth) Bart, and diverse bryophytes (Ochyra et al., 2002; Øvstedal & Smith, 2001).

Since 380 lichen species in Antarctica were reported in the comprehensive taxonomic survey conducted by Øvstedal and Smith (2001), the number of species has steadily increased with continuous addition of new species (Alstrup & Søchting, 2011; Halici et al., 2022; Øvstedal & Smith, 2009, 2011; Øvstedal & Schaefer, 2013; Park et al., 2018). In particular, King George Island (South Shetland Islands, Antarctica) was the subject of extensive research (Olech, 2004; Piñeiro et al., 2012; Redón, 1985; Spielmann & Pereira, 2012). Olech (2004) reported 294 taxa from the island, which represents about 77% of the lichen diversity of Antarctica as a whole.

King George Island is one of the most appropriate places for studying the biodiversity and evolution of lichenized fungi of Antarctica because of its geographical location and the diversity of lichens (Kim et al., 2006; Lee et al., 2008; Øvstedal & Smith, 2001). Floristic notes on lichens in 1993 covering the Fildes Peninsula of King George Island and Harmony Cove of Nelson Island indicated 198 species; however, determination of many of these species is unreliable due to the unavailability of the type collections or a lack of adequate collections (Hertel, 1988; Inoue, 1991, 1993). Information on the lichen species in Antarctica remains insufficient for comprehensive ecological studies despite its significance (Kim et al., 2006). Floristic research has been conducted in some of the localities (Admiralty Bay, Elephant Bay, and Lions Rump area) of King George Island (Olech, 2002); however, the areas around Maxwell Bay have often been excluded. Kim et al. (2006) reported 62 lichenized fungi from Barton Peninsula and Weaver Peninsula, part of Maxwell Bay region of the island. They conducted intensive survey close to the King Sejong Korean Antarctic Research Station in Barton Peninsula to investigate the presence and distribution of vegetation. In addition, the phylogenetic analyses of 50 lichenized fungi from King George Island were analyzed using the partial large subunit ribosomal DNA sequences (Lee et al., 2008).

However, the information on lichen diversity is insufficient due to the cryptic diversity and the less visible characteristics of microlichen species in this region.

This study aims to provide complementary lichen floristic information to understand the terrestrial biodiversity of the maritime Antarctic region and to conduct comparative studies with the biodiversity of other Antarctic Conservation Biogeographical Regions (Terauds & Lee, 2016). We investigated lichen flora intensively in the Maxwell Bay region, i.e. Barton Peninsula, Fildes Peninsula, Weaver Peninsula, and Ardley Island in King George Island during an Antarctic expedition from 2008‒2016. We also provide ecological and geographical information of collected specimens along with taxonomic identification. The past specimens from the region were re-examined as well.

Materials and Methods

Study Area

Maxwell Bay (62°25′S; 58°85′W) is located between King George Island and Nelson Island in the South Shetland Islands of Antarctica. It is a common fjord-like Antarctic embayment characterized by a U-shaped deep basin. Fieldwork was carried out in Barton Peninsula, Fildes Peninsula, Weaver Peninsula, and Ardley Island located around Maxwell Bay (Fig. 1). The study area includes the Antarctic Specially Protected Areas (ASPAs) that are designated to protect environmental and scientific values such as breeding bird colonies, relatively extensive flora, and geological features under the Antarctic Treaty System. Narębski Point (ASPA No. 171) encloses penguin colonies and is located on the southeast coast of Barton Peninsula, King George Island. Ardley Island is an islet that is 1.9 km long and is located off the southwest end of King George Island. Bird colonies inhabit the area, and the whole island has been designated as ASPA No. 150 (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Maxwell Bay, King George Island, Antarctica. Lichen samples were collected from (1) Barton Peninsula, (2) Weaver Peninsula, (3, 4) Fildes Peninsula, and (5) Ardley Island. Antarctic Specially Protected Area (ASPA) No. 171 and ASPA No. 150 marked with asterisks

Specimen Collection

A total of 982 specimens were collected from the study area and were examined during Antarctic expeditions from 2008 to 2016. Ecological information such as habitats, substrata, and other ambient traits at nearby locations were recorded for all specimens. Geographic coordinates of collection sites were recorded with GPSMAP 64 s (Garmin) or Trimble R8 GNSS /Trimble HPB450 /Geoexplorer 6000 XH Handheld, (Geosystems Inc.). The specimens were then deposited at the Korea Polar Research Institute (KOPRI).

Taxonomic Nomenclature

All the species listed in Tables 1 and 2 followed the current name on MycoBank (www.mycobank.org/) and were confirmed with Index Fungorum (www.indexfungorum.org/), and GBIF (www.gbif.org/). If the taxonomic nomenclature was controversial in those references, the synonymy and/or taxonomy opinions of MycoBank were prioritized. The broad determination of the species was primarily conducted following Øvstedal and Smith (2001) and other relevant literature (mentioned below).

Table 1.

Recorded lichen taxa with chemical substances in Maxwell Bay region

No Class Order Family Species Authors Chemical substances (by TLC)
Dothideomycetes
1 Mastodiaceae Turgidosculum complicatulum (Nyl.) Kohlm. & E. Kohlm Negative
2 Capnodiales Cystocoleaceae Cystocoleus aff. ebeneus (Dillw.) Thwaites Negative
Eurotiomycetes
3 Verrucariales Verrucariaceae Verrucaria dispartita* Vain Negative
4 V. durietzii I.M. Lamb Negative
5 V. psychrophila* I.M. Lamb Negative
6 Wahlenbergiella striatula (Wahlenb.) Gueidan & Thüs Negative
Lecanoromycetes
7 Acarosporales Acarosporaceae Acarospora austroshetlandica,* (C.W. Dodge) Øvstedal Negative
8 A. flavocordia* Castello & Nimis Rhizocarpic a
9 A. macrocyclos* Vain Negative
10 A. wahlenbergii H. Magn Negative
11 Baeomycetales Hymeneliaceae Tremolecia atrata (Ach.) Hertel Negative
12 Trapeliaceae Placopsis contortuplicata I.M. Lamb Gyrophoric a
13 Caliciales Caliciaceae Amandinea babingtonii* (Hook. f. & Taylor) Søchting & Øvstedal Negative
14 A. coniops (Wahlenberg.) M.Choisy ex Scheid. & H.Mayrhofer Norstictic a
15 Caliciales Caliciaceae A. isabellina* (Hue) Søchting & Øvstedal Negative
16 A. latemarginata* Darb. Søchting & Øvstedal Norstictic a
17 Buellia augusta* Vain Norstictic a
18 B. russa* (Hue) Darb Norstictic a
19 Tetramelas anisomerus (Vain.) Elix Xanthons
20 T. darbishirei* (I.M. Lamb) Elix Negative
21 T. granulosus* (Darb.) A. Nordin Xanthons
22 T. grimmiae* (Filson) Elix Negative
23 Physciaceae Physcia caesia (Hoffm.) Hampe ex Fürnr Atranorin, zeorin
24 P. dubia (Hoffm.) Lettau Atranorin
25 Physconia muscigena (Ach.) Poelt Negative
26 Rinodina olivaceobrunnea C.W. Dodge & G.E. Baker Pannarin
27 Lecanorales Catillariaceae Alectoria corymbosa* Hue Atroanorin, gyrophoric a., lecanoric a
28 Catillaria contristans (Nyl.) Zahlbr Negative
29 Cladoniaceae Cladonia borealis S. Stenroos Barbatic a., Usnic a
30 C. carneola (Fr.) Fr Barbatic a., Usnic a
31 C. chlorophaea (Flörke ex Sommerf.) Spreng Fumarprotocetraric a., protocetraric a
32 C. cornuta (L.) Hoffm Fumarprotocetraric a., protocetraric a
33 Lecanorales Cladoniaceae C. fimbriata (L.) Fr Fumarprotocetraric a., protocetraric a
34 C. galindezii Øvstedal Atranorin, porphyrilic a
35 C. gracilis (L.) Willd Fumarprotocetraric a., protocetraric a., atranorin
36 C. lepidophora Ahti & Kashiw Fumarprotocetraric a., usnic a
37 C. novochlorophaea (Sipman) Brodo & Ahti Fumarprotocetraric a., protocetraric a., homosekikaic a., sekikaic a
38 C. pleurota (Flörke) Schaer Usnic a., zeorin
39 C. pyxidata (L.) Hoffm Fumarprotocetraric a
40 C. sarmentosa

(Hook. f. & Taylor)

C.W. Dodge

Fumarprotocetraric a
41 C. scabriuscula (Delise) Nyl Fumarprotocetraric a., protocetraric a., atranorin
42 C. squamosa (Scop.) Hoffm Thamnolic a., squamatic a., barbatic a
43 C. subulata (L.) Weber ex F.H. Wigg Fumarprotocetraric a
44 C. cf. weymouthii F. Wilson ex A.W. Archer Barbatic a
45 Haematommataceae Haematomma erythromma (Nyl.) Zahlbr Atranorin, stictic a
46 Lecanoraceae Carbonea assentiens* (Nyl.) Hertel Atranorin, zeorin
47 C. vorticosa (Flörke) Hertel Not investigated
48 Lecanora aspidophora* Vain Norrangiformic a., usnic a., zeorin
49 L. brialmontii* Vain Not investigated
50 L. elegans f. lucens Nyl Anthraquinones
51 Lecanorales Lecanoraceae L. epibryon (Ach.) Ach Stictic a., atranorin, zeorin
52 L. gerlachei* Vain Negative
53 L. parmelinoides Lumbsch Atranorin
54 L. polytropa (Ehrh.) Rabenh Usnic a., zeolin
55 Lecidella carpathica Körb Atranorin
56 L. wulfenii (Ach.) Körb Negative
57 Parmeliaceae Bryoria forsteri Olech & Bystrek Negative
58 Cetraria aculeata (Schreb.) Fr Lichesterinic a., protolichesterinic a
59 Himantormia lugubris* (Hue.) I.M. Lamb Barbatoric a
60 Parmelia saxatilis (L.) Ach Atranorin, salazinic a
61 Pseudephebe pubescens (L.) M. Choisy Negative
62 Usnea antarctica Du Rietz Fumarprotocetraric a., usnic a
63 U. aurantiaco-atra (Jacq.) Bory Fumarprotocetraric a., norstictic a., usnic a
64 Ramalinaceae Ramalina terebrata Hook. f. & Taylor Usnic a
65 Sphaerophoraceae Sphaerophorus globosus (Huds.) Vain Squamatic a., thamnolic a
66 Stereocaulaceae Lepraria borealis Loht. & Tønsberg Atranorin, rangiformic, norrangiformic a
67 Lecanorales Stereocaulaceae Stereocaulon alpinum Laurer Atranorin, lobaric a
68 S. caespitosum Redinger Atranorin, lecanoric a
69 Tephromelataceae Tephromela antarctica* Øvstedal Negative
70 Tephromela atra (Huds.) Hafellner Atranorin, alectolonic a
71 Lecideales Lecideaceae Bellemerea alpina (Sommerf.) Clauzade & Cl. Roux Norstictic a
72 Lecidea cancriformis* C.W. Dodge and G.E. Baker Negative
73 Lecidea cerussata* Hue Negative
74 Lecidea coralligera* Hue Negative
75 Lecidea lapicida (Ach.) Ach Stictic a
76 Lecidea physciella* Darb Usnic a
77 Porpidia austroshetlandica Hertel Porphyrylic a
78 Peltigerales Collemataceae Leptogium puberulum* Hue Negative
79 Massalongiaceae Massalongia carnosa (Dicks.) Körb Negative
80 Pannariaceae

Protopannaria

austro-orcadensis

(Øvstedal) P.M. Jørg Negative
81 Psoroma antarcticum S.G. Hong & Elvebakk Negative
82 Psoroma hypnorum (Vahl) Gray Negative
83 Peltigerales Pannariaceae Psoroma tenue Henssen Pannaric a., porpyrylic a
84 Pertusariales Megasporaceae Aspicilia aff. aquatica (Fr.) Körb Stictic a
85 Megaspora verrucosa (Ach.) Hafellner & V. Wirth Negative
86 Ochrolechiaceae Ochrolechia frigida (Sw.) Lynge Gyrophoric a., lecanoric a
87 Ochrolechia parella (L.) A. Massal Gyrophoric a
88 Pertusariaceae Lepra dactylina (Ach.) Hafellner Atranorin, protocetraric a.,
89 Lepra excludens (Nyl.) Hafellner Norstictic a
90 Pertusaria signyae* Øvstedal 2'-O-methylperlatolic a
91 Rhizocarpales Rhizocarpaceae Rhizocarpon geographicum (L.) DC Psoromic a., rhizocarpic a.,
92 Rhizocarpon nidificum (Hue) Darb Psoromic a., rhizocarpic a.,
93 Teloschistales Teloschistaceae Athallia holocarpa

(Hoffmann) Arup,

Frödén & Søchting

Anthraquinones
94 Placodium cirrochrooides* Vain Parietin
95 Blastenia johnstonii* C.W. Dodge Anthraquinones
96 Caloplaca buelliae* Olech & Søchting Anthraquinones
97 Caloplaca cerina (Hedw.) Th. Fr Anthraquinones
98 Teloschistales Teloschistaceae Flavoplaca citrina (Hoffmann) Arup, Frödén & Søchting Parietin
99 Gondwania sublobulata (Nyl.) S.Y. Kondr., Kärnefelt, Elix, A. Thell, J. Kim, M.-H. Jeong, N.-N. Yu, A.S. Kondr. & Hur Parietin
100 Placodium regale Vain Parietin
101 Polycauliona candelaria (L.) Frödén, Arup & Søchting Anthraquinones
102 Xanthoria elegans (Link) Th. Fr Anthraquinones
103 Umbilicariales Umbilicariaceae Umbilicaria antarctica* Frey & I.M. Lamb Gyrophoric a
104 Umbilicaria decussata (Vill.) Zahlbr Gyrophoric a

Bold letter, newly recorded in the region; , the specimens which were identified (confirmed) with DNA sequence. *, endemic species of the Antarctic, TLC, thin layer chromatography, a., acid

Table 2.

Ecological traits of the species in Maxwell Bay region

No Species Locationa Subb Occc Ecological traits
1 2 3 4
1 Turgidosculum complicatulum _ _ r  +  +  Seashore, around coastal cliffs, lichen flora abundant, around penguin colonies
2 Cystocoleus aff. ebeneus _ _ r, s  +  +  Arid area, dead mosses on gravelly soil, overhangs
3 Verrucaria dispartita _ _ _ r  +  +  Coastal outcrops, intertidal zone, around penguin colonies
4 V. durietzii _ _ _ r  +  Coastal outcrops, around penguin colonies
5 V. psychrophila _ _ r  +  Coastal outcrops, intertidal zone, around penguin colonies
6 Wahlenbergiella striatula _ _ r  +  Coastal outcrops, intertidal zone, around penguin colonies
7 Acarospora austroshetlandica _ _ _ r  +  +  Seashore, on volcanic rocks
8 A. flavocordia _ _ r  +  +  Inland slope, dry boulders
9 A. macrocyclos _ _ _ r  +  +  Seashore, outcrops, around penguin colonies
10 A. wahlenbergii _ _ r  +  Seashore, pebbles, around lake
11 Tremolecia atrata _ _ _ r  +  +  Inland slope, outcrops, dry boulders
12 Placopsis contortuplicata r  +  +  +  Inland slope, patterned ground, dry boulders
13 Amandinea babingtonii _ _ _ r  +  +  Coastal rocks, boulders and pebbles, around lake
14 A. coniops _ r  +  +  +  Seashore, boulders and pebbles, overhangs
15 A. isabellina _ _ r  +  +  Coastal rocks, boulders and pebbles, around lake
16 A. latemarginata _ _ _ r  +  Coastal rocks, boulders and pebbles, around lake
17 Buellia augusta _ _ r  +  +  Coastal rocks, boulders and pebbles, around lake
18 Buellia russa _ _ _ r  +  Seashore, outcrops, around penguin colonies
19 Tetramelas anisomerus _ _ r  +  Seashore, Coastal pebbles
20 T. darbishirei _ _ r  +  Coastal rocks, boulders and pebbles, around lake
21 T. granulosus _ _ _ r  +  +  Coastal rocks, boulders and pebbles, around lake
22 T. grimmiae _ _ m, s  +  +  Coastal rocks, inland slope, around lake
23 Physcia caesia _ r  +  +  Seashore, around coastal cliffs, lichen flora abundant
24 P. dubia _ _ r  +  Seashore, around coastal cliffs, lichen flora abundant
25 Physconia muscigena _ _ m, r, s  +  Inland slope, rich vegetation, rocky soil
26 Rinodina olivaceobrunnea _ _ _ m, s  +  Inland slope, gravelly soil
27 Alectoria corymbosa _ _ r, s  +  +  Seashore, Inland slope, arid area, rocky soil
28 Catillaria contristans _ _ _ r, s  +  Inland slope, arid area, rocky soil
29 Cladonia borealis _ m, s  +  +  Inland slope, rich vegetation, moss mat, humid area
30 C. carneola _ _ m, s  +  Inland slope, rich vegetation, moss mat, humid area
31 C.chlorophaea _ m, s  +  Inland slope, rich vegetation, moss mat, humid area
32 C.cornuta _ _ m, s  +  +  Inland slope, rich vegetation, moss mat, arid to humid area, overhangs
33 C.fimbriata _ m, s  +  +  Inland slope, rich vegetation, moss mat, humid area
34 C.galindezii _ _ _ m, s  +  +  Inland slope, rich vegetation, moss mat, humid area
35 C.gracilis m, s  +  +  +  Inland slope, rich vegetation, moss mat, arid to humid area, overhangs
36 C.lepidophora _ _ m, s  +  Inland slope, rich vegetation, moss mat, humid area
37 C.novochlorophaea _ m, s  +  +  Inland slope, rich vegetation, moss mat, humid area
38 C.pleurota _ _ m, s  +  +  Inland slope, rich vegetation, moss mat, humid area
39 C.pyxidata _ m, s  +  +  Inland slope, rich vegetation, moss mat, humid area
40 C.sarmentosa _ _ m, s  +  +  +  Inland slope, rich vegetation, moss mat, humid area
41 C.scabriuscula m, s  +  +  Inland slope, rich vegetation, moss mat, arid to humid area, overhangs
42 C.squamosa m, s  +  +  +  Inland slope, rich vegetation, moss mat, arid to humid area, overhangs
43 C.subulata _ _ m, s  +  +  Inland slope, rich vegetation, moss mat, humid area
44 Cladonia cf. weymouthii _ _ _ m, s  +  Inland slope, gravelly soil, arid area, overhangs
45 Haematomma erythromma r  +  +  +  Intertidal zone, coastal outcrops, around perch boulders of penguin colonies
46 Carbonea assentiens _ _ r  +  +  Seashore, exposed outcrops and dry boulders
47 C.vorticosa _ _ r  +  +  Seashore, exposed outcrops and dry boulders
48 Lecanora aspidophora r  +  +  Seashore, outcrops, around penguin colonies
49 L. brialmontii _ r, wb  +  +  Seashore, intertidal zone, pebbles
50 L. elegans f. lucens _ _ r  +  Seashore, around coastal cliffs, lichen flora abundant
51 L. epibryon _ _ m, r, wb  +  +  Coastal rocks and pebbles, inland area
52 L. gerlachei _ _ r  +  Arid area, gravelly soil, overhangs, penguin colonies
53 Lecanora parmelinoides _ _ r  +  Inland area, moist rock surface, around lake
54 L. polytropa r  +  +  Seashore, outcrops, around penguin colonies
55 Lecidella carpathica _ _ _ r  +  Coastal rocks and pebbles, inland area
56 Lecidella wulfenii _ _ m  +  Inland slope, arid area
57 Bryoria forsteri _ _ m, r  +  Inland slope, rich vegetation, moss mat, arid to humid area
58 Cetraria aculeata m, s  +  +  Inland slope, rich vegetation, moss mat, humid area
59 Himantormia lugubris m, r  +  +  +  Inland slope, acidic rock surfaces, moss mat
60 Parmelia saxatilis _ _ m  +  Seashore, rich vegetation, moss mat, overhangs
61 Pseudephebe pubescens _ m, r  +  +  +  Inland slope, rich vegetation, moss mat
62 Usnea antarctica m, r, l  +  +  +  Inland slope, arid to humid area, moss mat, gravelly soil
63 U. aurantiaco-atra r  +  +  +  Inland slope, arid to humid area, moss mat, gravelly soil
64 Ramalina terebrata r  +  +  +  Seashore, around coastal cliffs, lichen flora abundant
65 Sphaerophorus globosus m, l  +  + 

Inland slope, rich vegetation,

related to Chorisdontium aciphyllum and Polytrichum strictum

66 Lepraria borealis m, r, s, l  +  +  +  Seashore, Inland slope, rich vegetation, moss mat, humid area
67 Stereocaulon alpinum m, s  +  +  Inland slope, rich vegetation, rocky soil
68 S. caespitosum _ _ _ m, r  +  Inland slope, outcrops, rocky soil
69 Tephromela antarctica _ r, s  +  +  Seashore, around coastal cliffs, lichen flora abundant
70 T. atra _ _ _ r  +  +  Seashore, inland slope, outcrops and pebbles
71 Bellemerea alpina _ _ r  +  +  Seashore, siliceous rock, around lake
72 Lecidea cancriformis _ _ _ r  +  +  Coastal rocks, overhangs
73 L. cerussata _ _ _ r  +  Coastal rocks, around perch boulders of penguin colonies
74 L. coralligera _ _ r  +  +  Widespread and frequent on rock
75 L. lapicida _ _ r  +  Coastal outcrops, intertidal zone
76 L. physciella _ r  +  +  Inland area, around lake, rocky soil
77 Porpidia austroshetlandica _ _ r  +  +  Coastal outcrops, Inland slope, dry boulders
78 Leptogium puberulum _ _ r  +  +  Intertidal zone, Coastal outcrops, around perch boulders of penguin colonies
79 Massalongia carnosa _ _ m  +  +  Inland slope, gravelly soil, related to Andreaea spp.
80 Protopannaria austro-orcadensis _ _ m, r, s  +  +  Humid area, gravelly soil
81 Psoroma antarcticum _ _ m, s  +  +  Seashore, inland slope, rich vegetation, moss mat
82 P. hypnorum _ m, s  +  +  +  Seashore, inland slope, rich vegetation, moss mat
83 P. tenue _ m, r, s  +  +  Seashore, inland slope, rich vegetation, moss mat
84 Aspicilia aff. aquatica _ _ r  +  +  Coastal outcrops, lichen flora abundant
85 Megaspora verrucosa _ m, s, wb  +  Inland area, calcareous habitats
86 Ochrolechia frigida m, l  +  +  +  Inland area, rich vegetation, dead moss mat
87 O. parella _ _ r  +  Seashore, dry boulders
88 Lepra dactylina _ _ _ r  +  Seashore, dry boulders
89 L. excludens _ _ r  +  +  Seashore, inland slope, dry boulders
90 Pertusaria signyae _ _ _ m, r  +  Seashore, inland slope, dry boulders
91 Rhizocarpon geographicum _ _ _ r  +  Seashore, inland slope, patterend ground, exposed rock surface
92 R. nidificum r  +  +  +  Inland slope, dry boulders
93 Athallia holocarpa _ _ r  +  +  +  Seashore, coastal pebbles
94 Blastenia johnstonii _ _ r  +  Seashore, coastal pebbles
95 Caloplaca buelliae _ _ _ r, l  +  +  Seashore, boulders and pebbles, growing on crustose lichens
96 C. cerina _ _ m, l  +  +  +  Inland area, lichen flora abundant
97 Flavoplaca citrina _ m, r, s  +  Seashore, inland area, lichen flora abundant
98 Gondwania sublobulata _ _ r  +  +  Seashore, around perch boulders of penguin colonies
99 Placodium cirrochrooides _ _ r  +  Seashore, around perch boulders of penguin colonies
100 P. regale _ r  +  +  +  Seashore, around coastal cliffs, lichen flora abundant
101 Polycauliona candelaria r  +  +  Seashore, around coastal cliffs, lichen flora abundant
102 Xanthoria elegans r, l  +  +  +  Seashore, around coastal cliffs, lichen flora abundant
103 Umbilicaria antarctica _ _ r  +  +  Seashore, inland area, outcrops and boulders
104 U decussata _ _ r  +  Seashore, dry boulders

aSpecimen collected spots (1, Barton Peninsula; 2, Weaver Peninsula; 3, Fildes Peninsula; 4, Ardley Island)

bSubstrate (l, lichen; m, moss; r, rock; s, soil; wb, whalebone)

cFrequency of species occurrence (+ +  + , common and easy to recognize; +  + , recognizable; +,  merely found)

Phenotypic Analysis

Morphological characteristics were examined under a microscope (Zeiss Boom Stand Stemi 2000 Stereo Microscope) and the components were analyzed by Thin Layer Chromatography (TLC). TLC analyses were performed according to standardized methods using solvent systems A and C, and Merck TLC silica gel with Lethariella cladonioides (Nyl.) Krog. as the control (Culberson, 1972; Orange et al., 2001).

Molecular Analysis

Molecular phylogenetic analyses were applied to 49 lichen species that were not clearly identified by morphological and chemical characteristics. Seventy-three specimens were identified using molecular analyses and among them, we obtained nucleotide sequences from 61 specimens through this study (Table S1). The samples of thalli were preserved at -80 °C in 100% ethanol for molecular analyses. For DNA extraction, samples were washed three times with 0.85% NaCl by vigorous mixing, spin down, and discarding of the supernatant. Samples were then freeze-dried and ground into a fine powder using a Tissue lyser (QIAGEN). DNA extraction was performed according to the DNA extraction protocol of the Exgene soil DNA mini kit (GeneAll, Cat No. 114–150). ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 (ITS) were amplified using ITS1F and LR5 (Gardes & Bruns, 1993; Vilgalys & Hester, 1990) and sequenced using the ITS1F and LR5 primers by the procedures described in a previous study (Park et al., 2012).

Sequence alignments of ITS2—nucLSU rDNA were conducted using the program jPHYDIT (Jeon et al., 2005) and were manually adjusted. Ambiguously aligned sites were excluded for phylogenetic analyses. Phylogenetic trees (Fig. S1) were inferred for ITS by maximum parsimony (MP), neighbor joining (NJ) and maximum likelihood (ML). The MP tree was obtained using the Subtree-Pruning-Regrafting (SPR) (Nei & Kumar, 2000), the NJ tree was obtained using the p-distance method and the ML tree was obtained using the GTR + I + G evolutionary model of MEGA X (Lanave et al., 1984; Nei & Kumar, 2000) with search level 5, in which the initial trees were obtained by bootstrap method (1000 replicates). All positions containing gaps were treated as missing data. Genbank accession numbers of the sequences are included in Table S1. Obtained sequences were handled for the determination of sequence similarity with reference sequences from the NCBI database (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/).

Result

Lichen Flora in Maxwell Bay Region

All lichen species surveyed in this study are listed under the taxonomic hierarchy in Table 1. Identification of several species was supported by molecular phylogeny in addition to morphology and chemistry. A total of one hundred-four species, belonging to 53 genera, were identified in the Maxwell Bay region (Table 1). Among them 22 species marked in bold letters are newly recorded around the bay and 31 species are endemic to Antarctica. Photographs of several Antarctic endemic species are provided in Fig. 2. Lecanorales showed the highest species diversity and followed by Caliciales and Teloschistales (Table 1).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Antarctic endemic lichen species living around Maxwell Bay. A Acarospora flavocordia Castello & Nimis (HSG080116-12), B Amandinea latemarginata Darb. Søchting & Øvstedal (2016KGS-086) C Buellia augusta Vain. (2016KGS-090) D Leptogium puberulum Hue. (2015KGS-238) E Pertusaria signyae Øvstedal (HSG080112-21), F Tephromela antarctica Øvstedal (HSG080112-19), G Tetramelas anisomerus (Vain.) Elix (2016KGIS-005), H T. darbishirei (Lamb.) Elix (2016KGS-081), I T. grimmiae (Filson) Elix (2016KGIS-004), J T. granulosus (Darb.) A. Nordin (HSG080117-09), K Verrucaria psychrophila Vain. (2016KGS-084), L Umbilicaria antarctica Frey and I.M. Lamb (2016KGS-076)

The observations of ecological traits were made at the time of specimen collection (Table 2). Among the sampling regions, Barton Peninsula showed the highest lichen diversity. Some species occurred on multiple substrates and habitats. Rock is the most general substrate for the lichen species in Maxwell Bay region (Fig. 3A). Seven epilichenic species were found and three crustose lichens were observed on a weathered whalebone. A few species favored several habitats: seashore, coastal cliff, and intertidal zones (Table 2). Some species showed habitat preference. Seven species were closely associated with the intertidal zone, especially the taxa of Verrucariaceae. Fifteen species were observed on perch boulders nearby nests of penguins and flying birds (Fig. 3B).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

The number of species that shows each ecological trait. A Substrate and B Habitat

Since Kotelko and Piercey–Normore (2010) Cladonia pocillum (Ach.) Grognot. and C. pyxidata (L.) Hoffm. are conspecific by genetic evidence, only C. pyxidata was included in the species list (Tables 1 and 2).

Newly Reported Taxa in Maxwell Bay Region

Twenty-two lichen species are newly recorded in Maxwell Bay region, King George Island (Table 1). The following list has arranged in alphabetical order. Illustrations of several lichen species are shown in Figs. 2 and 4.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Intriguing specimens and taxa. AE, Newly reported species from Antarctica. A and B, Lepra dactylina (specimen no. 2017-Ant-053). A Whole thallus of L. dactylina and B numerous isidia with dark-brown immersed discs. C and D Stereocaulon caespitosum (2017-Ant-061). C Pseudopodetia of S. caespitosum and D its apothecia (white arrow). E Wahlenbergiella striatula (2016KGS- 087) with perithecia (white arrow). F Cladonia gracilis (HUR ANT050826) which were previously misidentified. The closed axil (white arrow) is the diagnostic key

Acarospora flavocordia Castello & Nimis (Fig. 2A).

Lichen thallus effigurate and areolate, yellowish, brown apothecia are common on rock. Antarctic endemic. Examined specimen: HSG080116-12.

Acarospora wahlenbergii H. Magn.

Lichen thallus effigurate, brownish, blackish apothecia are common on rock. Bipolar. Examined specimen: 2016KGS-127.

Amandinea babingtonii (Hook. f. & Taylor) Søchting & Øvstedal.

Lichen thallus subeffigurate and areolate, brownish, black apothecia are common on rock. Antarctic endemic. Examined specimen: HSG080113-31, HSG080113-32.

Amandinea coniops (Wahlenberg.) M.Choisy ex Scheid. & H.Mayrhofer.

Lichen thallus crustose and granulose to areolate, greyish, black apothecia are common on rock. Bipolar. Examined specimen: HSG080113-32.

Aspicilia aff. aquatica (Fr.) Körb.

Lichen thallus rimose-arelate, whitish, black apothecia suncken in thallus are common on rock. Bipolar. Examined specimen: HSG080117-08.

Bellemerea alpina (Sommerf.) Clauzade & Cl. Roux.

Lichen thallus areolate, blue-grey, brown apothecia sunken in thallus are growing on rock. Bipolar. Examined specimen: HSG080116-06.

Caloplaca buelliae Olech & Søchting.

Lichen thallus invisible, orange apothecia are growing on rocks or lichens (Especially epilichenic on Buellia spp.). Antarctic endemic. Examined specimen: HSG080117-09.

Cladonia galindezii Øvstedal.

Primary thallus squamulose and persistent, podetia brownish green without scyphi are growing on moss and soil. Antarctic endemic. Examined specimen: HL090809-15B.

Cladonia subulata (L.) Weber ex F.H. Wigg.

Primary thallus squamulose, podetia subulate to scyphose and farinose sorediate are growing on moss and soil. Cosmopolitan. Examined specimen: PCH080110-37, PCH110127-13, 2015KGS-053, 2016KGS-009A.

Cladonia cf. weymouthii F. Wilson ex A.W. Archer.

Primary thallus disappearing, subulate and sorediate podetia are growing on moss and soil. Cosmopolitan. Examined specimen: PCH110124-05, 2016KGIE-013.

Lecanora elegans f. lucens Nyl.

Lichen thallus crustose and lobulate, orange. Vivid orange apothecia are common on rock. Southern hemisphere. Examined specimen: ANT050906.

Lecidella wulfenii (Ach.) Körb.

Lichen thallus disappearing, greyish granules, black apothecia are common on moss. Bipolar. Examined specimen: HSG080116-01.

Lepra dactylina (Ach.) Hafellner (Fig. 4A and B).

Lichen thallus subfruticose and isidiate, whitish, immersed blackish apothecia are growing on rock. Bipolar. Examined specimen: 2017-Ant-053.

Pertusaria signyae Øvstedal (Fig. 2E).

Lichen thallus coralloid isidiate, greyish are growing on rock. Apothecia are uncommon. Antarctic endemic. Examined specimen: HSG080112-21, HSG080117-04.

Psoroma tenue Henssen.

Lichen thallus squamulose, brownish, apothecia brownish and blackish are common on moss, soil and moist rock. Cosmopolitan. Examined specimen: HSG080113-17, HSG080113-14.

Stereocaulon caespitosum Redinger (Fig. 4C and D).

Lichen thallus white, pseudopodetia papillae to terete forming dark brown cephalodia are growing on rocky soil. Southern hemisphere. Examined specimen: 2017-Ant-061.

Tephromela antarctica Øvstedal (Fig. 2F).

Lichen thallus areolate, whitish and black apothecia are growing on soil and rock. Antarctic endemic. Examined specimen: 2017-Ant-061.

Tetramelas darbishirei (I.M. Lamb) Elix (Fig. 2H).

Lichen thallus areolate, greyish and black apothecia are common on rock. Antarctic endemic. Examined specimen: 2016KGS-081.

Tetramelas grimmiae (Filson) Elix (Fig. 2I).

Lichen thallus crustose, greyish and black apothecia are common on moss and soil. Antarctic endemic. Examined specimen: 2016KGIS-004.

Verrucaria dispartita Vain.

Lichen thallus crustose and rimose, black dot-like perithecia are common on rocks, especially intertidal zone. Antarctic endemic. Examined specimen: 2016KGS-088.

Verrucaria durietzii I.M. Lamb.

Lichen thallus effigurate with lobate margin, greyish, black dot-like perithecia are common on rocks, especially intertidal zone. Southern Hemisphere. Examined specimen: HSG080112-30.

Wahlenbergiella striatula (Wahlenb.) Gueidan & Thüs (Fig. 4E).

Lichen thallus crustose and subgelatinous, dark green, irregular shape of perithecia are common on rocks, especially intertidal zone. Cosmopolitan. Examined specimen: 2016KGS-087.

Delisted Species, Cladonia furcata (Huds.) Schrad.

Cladonia furcata (Huds.) Schrad. has been previously reported once in Antarctica, based on the specimens from Barton Peninsula (Kim et al., 2006). The specimens were re-examined in this study (no. HUR ANT050856 and no. HUR ANT050857; Fig. 4F). They showed a morphology that was typical of Cladonia gracilis subsp. elongata (Wulfen) Vain. An unbranched to somewhat branched podetia and closed axil were observed (Fig. 4F). Tips were pointed and seldom narrowly scyphose. Typically, open axil and numerous squamules were observed in C. furcata. Cracks on the podetia and damaged tips were frequently observed and these may have been misconceived as the ‘open axil’ trait.

In these specimens, only fumarprotocetraric acid was found by TLC. The acid is found in both C. gracilis (L.) Willd. and C. furcata (Ahti & Stenroos, 2013). It was also proven to be closely related to C. gracilis based on the molecular phylogeny (Fig. 5). We suggest the delisting of C. furcata from the lichen list provided in Kim et al. (2006).

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Molecular phylogeny of the genus Cladonia in Maxwell Bay region. The trees were obtained by Maximum Likelihood method based on ITS rDNA. Additional trees were generated by Maximum Parsimony and Neighbor joining methods, the respective support values (ML/NJ/MP) are noted. Branches supported with bootstrap values > 70 and maintained by every method are indicated in thick. The specimens identified using molecular data in this paper are bold letters. Solid box indicates misidentified specimens and dotted box shows C. furcata

Discussion

Around the Maxwell Bay, twenty-two new lichen species have been identified (Table 1). Above all, Lepra dactylina, Stereocaulon caespitosum, and Wahlenbergiella striatula were previously unrecorded around the Maxwell Bay area, besides being foreign to Antarctica. L. dactylina was previously classified as Pertusaria dactylina (Ach.) Nyl. and is known as circumpolar species in the Arctic (Brodo et al., 2001), as reported by Olech (2002, 2004) from Lion Rump, King George Island; however, the records were subsequently revised to exclude this species (Olech and Slaby, 2016). Our specimen (no. 2017-Ant-053) exhibited a whitish thallus with numerous tall isidia (Fig. 4A and B), not just a thick crust, compared to the other Pertusaria spp. such as P. excludens Nyl. and P. signyae Øvstedal. (Brodo et al., 2001; Thomson, 1984). Stereocaulon caespitosum observed in New Zealand and Tasmania were flattened and had cracked pseudopodetia without enlarged tips (Smith & Øvstedal, 1991), and those collected from South Georgia had the same features. This species had been found in the subantarctic region but not in the Antarctic (Øvstedal & Smith, 2001). In this study, the specimen (no. 2017-Ant-061) collected from the Barton Peninsula was comparable to and corresponded with the descriptions of S. caespitosum (Fig. 4C). It should be noted that the Antarctic specimen showed large pale orange apothecia which has not been observed previously (Fig. 4D).

Gueidan et al. (2009) conducted a generic revision of Verrucariaceae. Verrucaria striatula was combined into the new genus Wahlenbergiella with V. mucosa according to the molecular and morphological evidence. This species is a common lichen on the littoral zone in the Northern Hemisphere but has seldom been recorded in the Southern Hemisphere. The specimen collected from New Zealand was described by Santesson (1939) and named V. striatula subsp. australis. Currently, two of the subspecies are in the New Zealand lichen flora list together as Wahlengergiella (de Lange et al., 2018). Verrucaria striatula subsp. australis showed a more effuse thallus margin (McCarthy, 1991) than that in the Northern Hemisphere, and our specimen shared characteristics with the former. The prominent perithecia (a small flask-shaped fruiting body that contains the ascospores) are often irregular in shape (Fig. 4E), and ostioles are comparatively large. The thallus is distinctive in its cover of black dots and ridges which gives the surface a rough texture. The combination of dark ridges and tiny black dots on a green-black thallus is a typical feature of this species. Verrucaria amphibia (Clemente) may be confused with W. striatula; however, it is darker with ridges but lacks the dot matrix that gives the thallus surface texture (Brodo & Santesson, 1997). TLC was negative in the examined specimen. Wahlenbergiella striatula is a pyrenolichen occurring on siliceous maritime rocks in the mid- to high-tide mark on rocky coasts. Wahlenbergiella striatula and Verrucaria spp. is usually found on the boulders, particularly near the Chinstrap penguin colonies (Table 2).

We identified 104 species of 53 genera and added 22 unrecorded species to the previous lichen floristic studies around the Maxwell Bay region (Guzmán & Redón, 1981; Hu, 1998; Inoue, 1991, 1993; Jianbin, 1996; Kim et al., 2006; Olech, 1996, 2004; Øvstedal & Smith, 2001). The Barton Peninsula showed the highest lichen diversity with 101 species among the sampling regions for the number of lichen taxa recorded. A Polish lichenologist, Olech conducted a comprehensive lichen floristic study of King George Island and 153 sampling points were visited for the study (Olech, 2004). In the study, 253 lichen species were reported, of which 74 taxa were newly recorded. Only 16% of the newly recorded taxa were found around Maxwell Bay, as most of the sampling points (101 points) were concentrated at the Admiralty Bay where the Polish Antarctic research station is located. From Barton Peninsula, Olech (2004) reported just 16 species from three points. Because of the harsh environment and remoteness of Antarctica, detailed Antarctic lichen floristic studies have been limited to areas that are near the Antarctic research stations, so that our investigation was also carried out around the Korean Antarctic Research Station. However, the topography of the Barton Peninsula is much dynamic, glacio-marine origin, and is marked by fjords, cirque, flatforms, and hanging valleys covered with bedrocks, rock fragments, moraines, raised beaches, patterned grounds, and patterned beaches (Chang et al., 2003). The complex topography of the peninsula provides a variety of habitats for diverse lichens despite the relatively narrow exposed area. This intensive survey noted that the Barton Peninsula exhibited noticeable lichen diversity and variety and may be referred to as ‘The diversity hotspot’ (Green et al., 2011; Ji et al., 2016). Given the geographical and ecological significance of the Antarctic research, the comprehensive study of the peninsula was comparatively lacking prior to this survey.

Our result shows that Lecanorales had the highest species diversity, followed by Caliciales and Teloschistales (Table 3 and Fig. 6). This trend was seen in other studies in the regions of King Gorge Island and South Shetlands Islands. Lecanorales is also the most diverse taxa of lichens worldwide. Ostropales and Arthoniales are highly diverse worldwide (Table 3), few have been reported from the Antarctic region because of their micro size or inconspicuous parasitic (lichenicolous) taxa and a lack of specialists; Olech (2004) only reported six taxa of Arthoniales and one of Ostropales from King George Island. On the other hand, while most diverse orders were the same, the proportions of Lecanorales and Caliciales were similar in Cape Hallett in the Eastern Antarctic region (i.e., a continental Antarctic climate region), one of the richest sites for terrestrial biodiversity in the Ross Sea region where fifty-nine lichen species were reported for eight sites (Green et al., 2015). Most species were crustose and a few were foliose near an Adelie penguin colony, which acted as a major source of ammonia (Theobald et al., 2013). Other eastern Antarctic Lichen flora reported from Schirmacher Oasis and Larsemann Hills, Prydz Bay included up to 69 and 25 lichen species respectively (Singh & Nayaka, 2017). The major lichen taxa recorded in the region consisted of Buellia with 10 species, followed by 9 species of Lecanora, and 5 species each of Caloplaca and Umbilicaria. However, owing to the diverse habitats of lichen in the Antarctic terrestrial ecosystem, we expect that more cryptic taxa will be reported in future studies, particularly, in the eastern Antarctic region where fewer studies have been conducted than the western Antarctic region.

Table 3.

The comparison of the species diversity of lichen taxonomic orders

Order South Shetland Island Maxwell Bay Cape Hallett Worldwide
Øvstedal and Smith (2001) on the survey Green et al. (2015) Lücking et al. (2017)
Acarosporales 5 4 3 259
Arthoniales 2 0 0 1,541
Baeomycetales 3 2 0 21
Caliciales 18 14 16 1,276
Capnodiales 1 1 0 5
Lecanorales 79 44 20 6,231
Lecideales 12 7 2 249
Ostropales 2 0 0 3,261
Peltigerales 15 6 0 1,301
Pertusariales 12 7 0 907
Rhizocarpales 7 2 2 236
Teloschistales 32 10 11 841
Umbilicariales 7 2 4 168
Verrucariales 14 4 0 946
Total (species) 209 103 58 17,242

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

The comparison of species ratio of lichen taxonomic orders. The ratio obtained from the literatures reported species around Worldwide (Lücking et al., 2017) and Antarctic regions, Cape Hallett (Green et al., 2015), Maxwell Bay (this study), and South Shetland Islands (Øvstedal & Smith, 2001)

Furthermore, a significant number of unrecorded species were discovered and most of them were microlichens, which suggests that the biodiversity of the Antarctic lichens may be not to be fully revealed. Lichen flora in the Antarctic are surprisingly rich, and are equally at risk from environmental change as lichens in other regions (Chown et al., 2015). In particular, glacial outposts are worthy to be investigated for further understanding of the Antarctic floristic composition and their roles in the ecosystem in the context of global warming, and more information on the lichen diversity (as the most dominant component of Antarctic terrestrial ecosystems) is required.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a grant to the Korea Polar Research Institute, KOPRI, under projects (PE22130). We are also grateful to anonymous reviewers for their suggestions and remarks on manuscript.

Data availability

The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are available from the correspo nding author on reasonable request. GeneBank accession numbers of the sequences are included in Table S1.

Declarations

Conflict of interest

There are no conflicts of interest to declare.

References

  1. Ahti T, Stenroos S. Cladoniaceae. Uppsala University; 2013. [Google Scholar]
  2. Alstrup V, Søchting U. Massalongia olechiana (Massalongiaceae, Peltigerales), a new lichen species from the Antarctic. Polish Polar Research. 2011;32(2):117–121. doi: 10.2478/v10183-011-0011-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brodo IM, Santesson R. Lichens of the Queen Charlotte Islands, British Columbia, Canada. 3. Marine species of Verrucaria (Verrucariaceae, Ascomycotina) Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory. 1997;82:27–37. [Google Scholar]
  4. Brodo IM, Sharnoff SD, Sharnoff S. Lichens of North America. Yale University Press; 2001. [Google Scholar]
  5. Chang SK, Lee JI, Choe MY, Hur SD. Geology around the King Sejong Station, King George Island off the Antarctic Peninsula. Journal of the Geological Society of Korea. 2003;39(2):271–286. [Google Scholar]
  6. Chown SL, Clarke A, Fraser CI, Cary SC, Moon KL, McGeoch MA. The changing form of Antarctic biodiversity. Nature. 2015;522(7557):431–438. doi: 10.1038/nature14505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Culberson CF. Improved conditions and new data for identification of lichen products by standardized thin-layer chromatographic method. Journal of Chromatography A. 1972;72(1):113–125. doi: 10.1016/0021-9673(72)80013-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. de Lange, P., Blanchon, D., Knight, A., Elix, J. A., Lücking, R., Frogley, K., ... and Rolfe, J. R. (2018). Conservation status of New Zealand indigenous lichens and lichenicolous fungi.
  9. Gardes M, Bruns TD. ITS primers with enhanced specificity for basidiomycetes-application to the identification of mycorrhizae and rusts. Molecular Ecology. 1993;2(2):113–118. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.1993.tb00005.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Green TGA, Sancho LG, Türk R, Seppelt RD, Hogg ID. High diversity of lichens at 84 S, Queen Maud Mountains, suggests preglacial survival of species in the Ross Sea region Antarctica. Polar Biology. 2011;34(8):1211–1220. doi: 10.1007/s00300-011-0982-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  11. Green TA, Seppelt RD, Brabyn LR, Beard C, Türk R, Lange OL. Flora and vegetation of Cape Hallett and vicinity, northern Victoria Land Antarctica. Polar Biology. 2015;38(11):1825–1845. doi: 10.1007/s00300-015-1744-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gueidan, C., Savić, S., Thüs, H., Roux, C., Keller, C., Tibell, L., ... and Lutzoni, F. (2009). Generic classification of the Verrucariaceae (Ascomycota) based on molecular and morphological evidence: recent progress and remaining challenges. Taxon, 58(1), 184–208.
  13. Guzmán G, Redón J. Los liquenes de peninsula Ardley y zonas adyacentes, isla Rey Jorge, Antartica Occidental. Serie Científica INACH. 1981;27:19–37. [Google Scholar]
  14. Halici MG, Güllü M, Bölükbaşi E, Yiğit MK. Shackletonia backorii-A new species of lichenised fungus from James Ross Island (Antarctic Peninsula) Turkish Journal of Botany. 2022;46(5):500–506. doi: 10.55730/1300-008X.2725. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hertel H. 1.1 problems in monographing antarctic crustose lichens. Polarforschung. 1988;58(2/3):65–76. [Google Scholar]
  16. Hu SS. Moss community types and species diversity of southern Fildes Peninsula (King George Island, South Shetland Islands) Antarctica. The Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory. 1998;84:187–198. [Google Scholar]
  17. Inoue M. Ecological notes on the differences in flora and habitat of lichens between the Syowa station area in continental Antarctic and King George Island in maritime Antarctic. Proceedings of the NIPR Symposium on Polar Biology. 1991;4:91–106. [Google Scholar]
  18. Inoue M. Floristic notes on lichens in the Files Peninsula of King George Island and Harmmony Cove of Nelson Island, South Shetland Islands, the Antarctic. Proceedings of the NIPR Symposium on Polar Biology. 1993;6:106–120. [Google Scholar]
  19. Jeon YS, Chung H, Park S, Hur I, Lee JH, Chun J. jPHYDIT: A JAVA-based integrated environment for molecular phylogeny of ribosomal RNA sequences. Bioinformatics. 2005;21(14):3171–3173. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti463. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Ji M, van Dorst J, Bissett A, Brown MV, Palmer AS, Snape I, Ferrari BC. Microbial diversity at Mitchell Peninsula, Eastern Antarctica: a potential biodiversity “hotspot”. Polar Biology. 2016;39(2):237–249. doi: 10.1007/s00300-015-1776-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  21. Jianbin C. Lichens from Fildes Peninsula, King George Island, Antarctica I. the genus Usnea subgenus Neuropogon. Acta Mycologica Sinica. 1996;15(1):21–25. [Google Scholar]
  22. Kim JH, Ahn IY, Hong SG, Andreev M, Lim KM, Oh MJ, Hur JS. Lichen flora around the Korean Antarctic Scientific Station, King George Island, Antarctic. Journal of Microbiology. 2006;44(5):480–491. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Kotelko R, Piercey-Normore MD. Cladonia pyxidata and C. pocillum; genetic evidence to regard them as conspecific. Mycologia. 2010;102(3):534–545. doi: 10.3852/09-030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Lanave C, Preparata G, Sacone C, Serio G. A new method for calculating evolutionary substitution rates. Journal of Molecular Evolution. 1984;20(1):86–93. doi: 10.1007/BF02101990. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Lee JS, Lee HK, Hur JS, Andreev M, Hong SG. Diversity of the lichenized fungi in King George Island, Antarctica, revealed by phylogenetic analysis of partial large subunit rDNA sequences. Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2008;18(6):1016–1023. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Lücking R, Hodkinson BP, Leavitt SD. The 2016 classification of lichenized fungi in the Ascomycota and Basidiomycota-Approaching one thousand genera. The Bryologist. 2017;119(4):361–416. doi: 10.1639/0007-2745-119.4.361. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  27. McCarthy PM. Notes on Australian Verrucariaceae (Lichenes): 2. Muelleria. 1991;7(3):317–332. doi: 10.5962/p.198514. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  28. Nei M, Kumar S. Molecular Evolution and Phylogenetics. Oxford University Press; 2000. [Google Scholar]
  29. Ochyra R, Bednarek-Ochyra H, Lewis Smith RI. New and rare moss species from subantarctic South Georgia. Nova Hedwigia. 2002;74:121–147. doi: 10.1127/0029-5035/2002/0074-0121. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  30. Olech M. Human impact on terrestrial ecosystem in west Antarctica. Proceedings of the NIPR Symposium on Polar Biology. 1996;9:299–306. [Google Scholar]
  31. Olech, M. (2002). Plant communities on King George Island. In: L. Beyer, M. Bölter (Eds.), Geoecology of Antarctic Ice-Free Coastal Landscapes. Ecological Studies (vol 154). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. 10.1007/978-3-642-56318-8_12
  32. Olech M. Lichens of King George Island. Institute of Botany of the Jagiellonian University; 2004. [Google Scholar]
  33. Olech M, Słaby A. Changes in the lichen biota of the Lions Rump area, King George Island, Antarctica, over the last 20 years. Polar Biology. 2016;39(8):1499–1503. doi: 10.1007/s00300-015-1863-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  34. Orange A, James PW, White FJ. Microchemical methods for the identification of lichens. 2. British Lichen Society; 2001. [Google Scholar]
  35. Øvstedal DO, Schaefer CEGR. A new lichen species from the Heritage Range, Ellsworth Mountains, Antarctica. Hoehnea. 2013;40:361–364. doi: 10.1590/S2236-89062013000200006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  36. Øvstedal DO, Smith RL. Lichens of Antarctica and South Georgia: A guide to their identification and ecology. Cambridge University Press; 2001. [Google Scholar]
  37. Øvstedal DO, Smith RIL. Further additions to the lichen flora of Antarctica and South Georgia. Nova Hedwigia. 2009;88(1/2):157–168. doi: 10.1127/0029-5035/2009/0088-0157. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  38. Øvstedal DO, Smith RIL. Four additional lichens from the Antarctic and South Georgia, including a new Leciophysma species. Folia Cryptogamica Estonica. 2011;48:65–68. [Google Scholar]
  39. Park CH, Hong SG, Elvebakk A. Psoroma antarcticum, a new lichen species from Antarctica and neighbouring areas. Polar Biology. 2018;41(6):1083–1090. doi: 10.1007/s00300-018-2265-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  40. Park CH, Jeong G, Hong SG. Possible multiple introductions of Cladonia borealis to King George Island. Antarctic Science. 2012;24(4):359–366. doi: 10.1017/S0954102012000223. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  41. Piñeiro V, Eguren G, Pereira I, Zaldúa N. Neighborhood lichens of Uruguayan Antartic Scientific Station, Collins Bay, King George Island, Antarctica. Polibotánica. 2012;33:105–116. [Google Scholar]
  42. Redón, J. (1985). Líquenes antárticos. Instituto Antártico Chileno, Santiago, Chile.
  43. Santesson R. cber die Zonationsverhiltnisse der lacustrinen Flechten einiger Seen in Anebodagebiet. Meddelanden Frdn Lunds Universitets Limnologiska Institution. 1939;1:1–70. [Google Scholar]
  44. Singh SM, Nayaka S. Contributions to the floral diversity of Schirmacher Oasis and Larsemann Hills, Antarctica. Proceedings of the Indian National Science Academy. 2017;2:469–481. [Google Scholar]
  45. Singh J, Singh RP, Khare R. Influence of climate change on Antarctic flora. Polar Science. 2018;18:94–101. doi: 10.1016/j.polar.2018.05.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  46. Smith RL. Classification and ordination of cryptogamic communities in Wilkes Land. Continental Antarctica. Vegetatio. 1988;76(3):155–166. [Google Scholar]
  47. Smith RL, Øvstedal DO. The lichen genus Stereocaulon in Antarctica and South Georgia. Polar Biology. 1991;11(2):91–102. doi: 10.1007/BF00234271. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  48. Spielmann AA, Pereira AB. Lichens on the maritime Antarctica. A small field guide for some common species. Glal. 2012;4(3):1–28. [Google Scholar]
  49. Terauds A, Lee JR. Antarctic biogeography revisited: Updating the antarctic conservation biogeographic regions. Diversity and Distributions. 2016;22(8):836–840. doi: 10.1111/ddi.12453. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  50. Theobald MR, Crittenden PD, Tang YS, Sutton MA. The application of inverse-dispersion and gradient methods to estimate ammonia emissions from a penguin colony. Atmospheric Environment. 2013;81:320–329. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.09.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  51. Thomson, J. W. (1984). American Arctic Lichens: The Microlichens (Vol. 2). Univ of Wisconsin Press.
  52. Vilgalys R, Hester M. Rapid genetic identification and mapping of enzymatically amplified ribosomal DNA from several Cryptococcus species. Journal of Bacteriology. 1990;172(8):4238–4246. doi: 10.1128/jb.172.8.4238-4246.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are available from the correspo nding author on reasonable request. GeneBank accession numbers of the sequences are included in Table S1.


Articles from Journal of Microbiology (Seoul, Korea) are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES