Skip to main content
World Journal of Emergency Medicine logoLink to World Journal of Emergency Medicine
letter
. 2023;14(2):143–147. doi: 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2023.029

Pneumothorax in a Thiel cadaver model of cardiopulmonary resuscitation

Daniel Auinger 1,, Simon Orlob 2, Johannes Wittig 3,4,5, Gabriel Honnef 1, Stefan Heschl 2, Georg Feigl 6,7, Gerhard Prause 1
PMCID: PMC9999140  PMID: 36911063

INTRODUCTION

There has been some previous research in the field of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) using cadaver models.[1] The Thiel method was developed by Professor Walter Thiel (Graz, Austria) and described in 1992 and 2002. It consists of both an intravascular injection of the embalming solution and submersion of the bodies in a tank with the same solution for a determined period.[2,3] Due to preserved tissue flexibility and elasticity and lifelike anatomical aspect, bodies embalmed by this method are used in training for medical procedures.[4-6] Respiratory mechanics and dynamic pressures during CPR in the Thiel cadaver model were found to be comparable with those of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients.[7]

Chest injuries are mostly inevitable when performing chest compressions for CPR. Several clinical studies have demonstrated the type and prevalence of CPR-associated injuries that can be potentially life-threatening.[8-10] This includes pneumothorax, an entry of air into the pleural space. Diagnosis is traditionally made by chest radiography but can also be done by lung ultrasound and computed tomography (CT).[11,12] The prevalence of CPR-associated pneumothorax varies widely in the current literature, and a review with pooled analysis states a total rate of 2.5%.[9] Studies using CT following CPR found higher rates of up to 20.1%.[10,13]

Tension pneumothorax is present when there is increased pressure in the pleural space due to a one-way valve mechanism that allows air to enter the pleural space with every breath but not to escape. In addition to respiratory impairment, there is also a collapse of major blood vessels and hemodynamic instability. Therefore, tension pneumothorax is a life-threatening emergency that requires immediate diagnosis and treatment. In European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2021, tension pneumothorax is among the potentially reversible causes of cardiac arrest.[14]

To the best of our knowledge, pneumothorax in simulated CPR using a cadaver model has not been previously described. In our study, we aimed to find out if, and how often pneumothorax and tension pneumothorax occur in simulated CPR using bodies embalmed by the Thiel method.

METHODS

The investigation of pneumothorax was conducted during the development and execution of a study protocol to evaluate the performance of three common transport ventilators during continuous chest compressions. In this study, MEDUMAT Standard² (WEINMANN Emergency Medical Technology GmbH+ Co. KG, Germany), Oxylog 3000 plus (Drägerwerk AG & Co. KGaA, Germany) and Monnal T60 Air Liquide Medical Systems (Antony Cedex, France) were tested to determine if they can achieve sufficient alveolar ventilation under simulated CPR conditions.[15]

Cadavers

Eleven cadavers were randomly selected, which did not show any signs of pre-existing thoracic injuries. Written informed consent was obtained from all body donors to donate their bodies for educational and scientific purposes. All bodies donated to science were investigated under the strict rule of the donation program of the Institute of Macroscopic and Clinical Anatomy of the Medical University of Graz and the Styrian burial law. Hence, no additional approval by the local ethics committee was needed.

Study procedure

The investigation followed a standardized protocol (Figure 1). First, cadavers were orally intubated by direct laryngoscopy. Bronchoscopy (aScope™ 4 Broncho Large, Ambu™, Denmark) was performed to verify tracheal tube positioning and to remove any fluid collections or residues of the embalming process.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Experiment flowchart. The experiment was conducted following a standardized protocol which is shown in this illustration. Adapted from Orlob et al.[15] PTOP: top pressure; VT: tidal volume; f: frequency; PEEP: positive end-expiratory pressure; I:E: inspiration/expiration ratio; PMAX: upper pressure limit; CPR: cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Initially, an intensive care respirator (Hamilton-C6, Hamilton Medical, Switzerland) for ventilation was used. Body height was measured and predicted body weight (PBW) was calculated. Lung recruitment was carried out by two quasistatic inflation manoeuvres and a 15-minute period of volume-controlled ventilation. For the first three cadavers, the applied top pressure of the 2nd inflation manoeuvre was 35 cmH2O (1 cmH2O=0.098 kPa) but was later reduced to 30 cmH2O due to the development of tension pneumothorax in all three cadavers.

In the course of the ventilation study, we assessed mechanical properties in three 2-minute sequences (ventilation only, chest compressions only, combined). Chest compressions were performed in a standardized way using an automated chest compression piston device (Corpuls CPR, GS Elektromedizinische Geräte G. Stemple GmbH, Germany) with a frequency of 103/min and depth of 5 cm.

In the intervention phase, the three ventilators were tested in a three-period crossover design. Each period consisted of two 2-minute cycles of simulated CPR. The order in which the ventilators were applied was randomly assigned by sealed envelopes to the individual cadaver.

Testing for pneumothorax, defined by the absence of lung sliding, was performed by bilateral lung ultrasound (Sonosite M-Turbo, FUJIFILM Sonosite GmbH, Frankfurt, Germany) by two clinicians trained and experienced in eFAST (extended focused assessment with sonography for trauma). This was performed after the initial recruitment phase and after every 2-minute cycle of chest compressions. We used a phased array probe that was positioned on the highest point of the anterior chest wall in a sagittal position, usually represented by the 3rd or 4th intercostal space in the mid-clavicular line.[16]

The whole course of the experiment consisted of 17 min of ventilation only, 2 min of chest compressions only and 14 min of ventilation and chest compression combined. Finally, bilateral finger thoracostomy was performed with particular attention given to the occurrence of tension pneumothorax, defined by the escape of air when performing thoracostomy.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics 27. Continuous data were tested for conformation with a normal distribution using the Kolmogorow-Smirnow test and were compared using an independent samples t-test. Categorical variables were compared using Fisher’s exact test. A P-value ≤0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

In total, we were able to detect pneumothorax in 8 out of 11 cadavers (72.7%), 4 bilaterally (36.4%), 2 left-sided (18.2%) and 2 right-sided (18.2%). Pneumothoraces were detected in different phases of the protocol, and the median cumulative chest compression time until detection of the first pneumothorax was 12 min (interquartile range 9.5, min–max 0–16) (Table 1).

Table 1.

Characteristics and results of the individual cadavers

graphic file with name WJEM-14-143-g002.jpg

Statistical testing for associations between cadaver variables (height, recruitment pressure, sex) and outcomes (any pneumothorax, tension pneumothorax) resulted in only one statistically significant finding. Tension pneumothorax was observed in all 3 cadavers which were subject to 35 cmH2O recruitment pressure. In contrast, we had this finding in only 1 out of 8 cases with the 30 cmH2O recruitment pressure. This association was found to be statistically significant (P=0.024).

DISCUSSION

Our results showed a pneumothorax rate of 72.7%, which is considerably higher compared to clinical data which show rates of up to 20.1%.[8–10,13] As previously demonstrated we found cadavers embalmed by the Thiel method suitable for simulating CPR to study mechanical and respiratory properties.[7] Additionally, lung ultrasound proved to be a suitable diagnostic method for pneumothorax in the Thiel cadaver model.

Bodies embalmed by the Thiel method are known for their close to in-vivo characteristics of tissues.[1-3] Based on our results it seems plausible that embalming makes the lung less resilient against the mechanical stress from chest compressions and ventilation. Thus, the transferability of our results to the clinical setting is highly limited. Recruitment pressure also seems to play a role. The 3 cadavers that were subjected to a higher recruitment pressure (35 cmH2O instead of 30 cmH2O) showed bilateral tension pneumothorax, with 2 of them being detectable after the 15-minute recruitment phase with no chest compressions. This led to a reduction in the maximum applied recruitment pressure in the study protocol. We are aware that this presents a limitation of the current study, however, we also consider this to be one of the key lessons learned from this experiment.

Additionally, the study protocol was primarily developed for the ventilator study which explains some more limitations (e.g., 4 different ventilators used, sample size, cross-over design).[15] There is insufficient evidence to support or refute the use of a mechanical ventilator for cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and current guidelines recommend the use of a bag-valve mask device.[17] However, we found it important to use standardized ventilatory settings in our experiment, which were chosen in accordance with applicable guidelines and experts’ opinions.[14,18]

We were unable to evaluate the medical history of the body donors which may have included pulmonary conditions. A mechanical chest compression device was used to standardize chest compressions; however, there is some literature stating a higher incidence of CPR-associated injuries when using mechanical chest compression devices.[19,20] This could have contributed to the higher occurrence of pneumothorax observed in our experiment. We are also aware that CT has superior sensitivity in detecting pneumothorax compared to lung ultrasound.[21] In our experimental setting, CT was not available.

CONCLUSIONS

CPR-associated pneumothorax is a phenomenon that occurs in simulated CPR using the Thiel cadaver model. The pneumothorax rate was found to be substantially higher compared to clinical data. Higher recruitment pressure seems to contribute to the development of tension pneumothorax. Future studies using Thiel cadavers for simulated CPR should account for these findings in their study protocols.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors wish to sincerely thank those who donated their bodies to science so that anatomical research could be performed.

We would also like to thank Evan Williams for the careful proofreading of this manuscript.

Footnotes

Funding: SO has received a grant to fund the ventilator study. The study was funded by the Austrian Association of Emergency and Disaster Medicine (abbr.: ÖNK) with the “Reinhard Malzer Award”. The association did not interfere with any steps towards the ventilator study or the current paper.

Ethical approval: All bodies donated to science were investigated under the strict rule of the donation program of the Institute of Macroscopic and Clinical Anatomy of the Medical University of Graz and the Styrian burial law. No additional approval by the local ethics committee was required.

Conflicts of interest: GP has given a talk at a national symposium, invited by RWM Medizintechnik GmbH. All other authors have no personal conflict of interest. Medical devices and equipment used in this study were kindly lent by the following companies: CHEMOMEDICA Medizintechnik und Arzneimittel VertriebsgmbH, Löwenstein Medical Austria GmbH, Sanitas GmbH, GS Elektromedizinische Geräte G. Stemple GmbH, Dräger Austria GmbH, WEINMANN Emergency Medical Technology, RWM Medizintechnik GmbH. No company or manufacturer had an influence on the study protocol, statistical analyses, nor was involved in writing of the paper.

Author contributions: concept DA, SO, JW, GP; design DA, SO, JW, GH, SH, GF, GP; definition of intellectual content DA, SO, JW, GH, GP; experimental studies DA, SO, JW, GH, GP; literature search DA, SO, JW, SH; data acquisition DA, SO, JW; statistical analysis DA, SH; manuscript preparation DA, SO, JW, GP; manuscript editing DA, SO, JW, SH, GF, GP; manuscript review DA, SO, JW, GH, SH, GF, GP.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Duhem H, Viglino D, Bellier A, Tanguy S, Descombe V, Boucher F, et al. Cadaver models for cardiac arrest:a systematic review and perspectives. Resuscitation. 2019;143:68–76. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.08.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Thiel W. The preservation of the whole corpse with natural color. Ann Anat. 1992;174(3):185–95. Article in German. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Thiel W. Supplement to the conservation of an entire cadaver according to W. Thiel. Ann Anat. 2002;184(3):267–9. doi: 10.1016/s0940-9602(02)80121-2. Article in German. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ottone NE, Vargas CA, Fuentes R, Gouge del wM. Walter thiel's embalming method:review of solutions and applications in different fields of biomedical research. Int J Morphol. 2016;34(4):1442–54. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Yiasemidou M, Roberts D, Glassman D, Tomlinson J, Biyani CS, Miskovic D. A multispecialty evaluation of thiel cadavers for surgical training:reply. World J Surg. 2017;41(12):3230–1. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-4251-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Szűcs Z, László CJ, Baksa G, László I, Varga M, Szuák A, et al. Suitability of a preserved human cadaver model for the simulation of facemask ventilation, direct laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation:a laboratory investigation. Br J Anaesth. 2016;116(3):417–22. doi: 10.1093/bja/aev546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Charbonney E, Delisle S, Savary D, Bronchti G, Rigollot M, Drouet A, et al. A new physiological model for studying the effect of chest compression and ventilation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation:the Thiel cadaver. Resuscitation. 2018;125:135–42. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.01.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Champigneulle B, Haruel PA, Pirracchio R, Dumas F, Geri G, Arnaout M, et al. Major traumatic complications after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest:insights from the Parisian registry. Resuscitation. 2018;128:70–5. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.04.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Miller AC, Rosati SF, Suffredini AF, Schrump DS. A systematic review and pooled analysis of CPR-associated cardiovascular and thoracic injuries. Resuscitation. 2014;85(6):724–31. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.01.028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Karatasakis A, Sarikaya B, Liu LD, Gunn ML, Kudenchuk PJ, Gatewood MO, et al. Prevalence and patterns of resuscitation-associated injury detected by head-to-pelvis computed tomography after successful out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation. J Am Heart Assoc. 2022;11(3):e023949. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.023949. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Alrajab S, Youssef AM, Akkus NI, Caldito G. Pleural ultrasonography versus chest radiography for the diagnosis of pneumothorax:review of the literature and meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2013;17(5):R208. doi: 10.1186/cc13016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ianniello S, Piccolo CL, Trinci M, Ajmone Cat CA, Miele V. Extended-FAST plus MDCT in pneumothorax diagnosis of major trauma:time to revisit ATLS imaging approach? J Ultrasound. 2019;22(4):461–9. doi: 10.1007/s40477-019-00410-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Betz S, Sassen M, Beutel B, Jerrentrup A, Kill C. Pneumothorax in out-of-hospital resuscitation:the need for early diagnostics in a cardiac arrest center. Resuscitation. 2018;130:e3. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Soar J, Böttiger BW, Carli P, Couper K, Deakin CD, Djärv T, et al. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021:adult advanced life support. Resuscitation. 2021;161:115–51. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.02.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Orlob S, Wittig J, Hobisch C, Auinger D, Honnef G, Fellinger T, et al. Reliability of mechanical ventilation during continuous chest compressions:a crossover study of transport ventilators in a human cadaver model of CPR. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2021;29(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s13049-021-00921-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Husain LF, Hagopian L, Wayman D, Baker WE, Carmody KA. Sonographic diagnosis of pneumothorax. J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2012;5(1):76–81. doi: 10.4103/0974-2700.93116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Wyckoff MH, Singletary EM, Soar J, Olasveengen TM, Greif R, Liley HG, et al. 2021 international consensus on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science with treatment recommendations:summary from the basic life support;advanced life support;neonatal life support;education, implementation, and teams;first aid task forces;and the COVID-19 working group. Resuscitation. 2021;169:229–311. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.10.040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Jamshed N, Sahu AK, Timilsina G, Mathew R. “Six-dial strategy”—mechanical ventilation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2020;24(6):487–9. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23464. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Koster RW, Beenen LF, van der Boom EB, Spijkerboer AM, Tepaske R, van der Wal AC, et al. Safety of mechanical chest compression devices AutoPulse and LUCAS in cardiac arrest:a randomized clinical trial for non-inferiority. Eur Heart J. 2017;38(40):3006–13. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx318. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Khan SU, Lone AN, Talluri S, Khan MZ, Khan MU, Kaluski E. Efficacy and safety of mechanical versus manual compression in cardiac arrest - A Bayesian network meta-analysis. Resuscitation. 2018;130:182–8. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.05.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Jalli R, Sefidbakht S, Jafari SH. Value of ultrasound in diagnosis of pneumothorax:a prospective study. Emerg Radiol. 2013;20(2):131–4. doi: 10.1007/s10140-012-1091-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from World Journal of Emergency Medicine are provided here courtesy of The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine

RESOURCES