Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Springer Nature - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Springer Nature - PMC COVID-19 Collection
. 2023 Feb 28;17(1):102–122. doi: 10.1007/s11708-023-0861-0

A systemic review of hydrogen supply chain in energy transition

Haoming Ma 1, Zhe Sun 1, Zhenqian Xue 1, Chi Zhang 1, Zhangxing Chen 1,✉
PMCID: PMC9999347

Abstract

Targeting the net-zero emission (NZE) by 2050, the hydrogen industry is drastically developing in recent years. However, the technologies of hydrogen upstream production, midstream transportation and storage, and downstream utilization are facing obstacles. In this paper, the development of hydrogen industry from the production, transportation and storage, and sustainable economic development perspectives were reviewed. The current challenges and future outlooks were summarized consequently. In the upstream, blue hydrogen is dominating the current hydrogen supply, and an implementation of carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) can raise its cost by 30%. To achieve an economic feasibility, green hydrogen needs to reduce its cost by 75% to approximately 2 $/kg at the large scale. The research progress in the midterm sector is still in a preliminary stage, where experimental and theoretical investigations need to be conducted in addressing the impact of embrittlement, contamination, and flammability so that they could provide a solid support for material selection and large-scale feasibility studies. In the downstream utilization, blue hydrogen will be used in producing value-added chemicals in the short-term. Over the long-term, green hydrogen will dominate the market owing to its high energy intensity and zero carbon intensity which provides a promising option for energy storage. Technologies in the hydrogen industry require a comprehensive understanding of their economic and environmental benefits over the whole life cycle in supporting operators and policymakers.

Keywords: hydrogen production, hydrogen transportation and storage, hydrogen economy, carbon capture and sequestration (CCS), technology assessment

References

  • 1.International Energy Agency. Global Energy Review 2021. Technical Report, IEA, 2021
  • 2.International Energy Agency. Net Zero by 2050. Technical Report, IEA, 2021
  • 3.International Energy Agency. Global Hydrogen Review 2021. Technical Report, IEA, 2021
  • 4.British Petroleum. BP Energy Outlook 2022 edition. Technical Report, British Institute of Energy Economics, 2022
  • 5.Abdalla A M, Hossain S, Nisfindy O B, et al. Hydrogen production, storage, transportation and key challenges with applications: a review. Energy Conversion and Management. 2018;165:602–627. doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2018.03.088. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Dincer I. Green methods for hydrogen production. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2012;37(2):1954–1971. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.03.173. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Longden T, Beck F J, Jotzo F, et al. ‘Clean’ hydrogen? — Comparing the emissions and costs of fossil fuel versus renewable electricity based hydrogen. Applied Energy. 2022;306:118145. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.118145. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hermesmann M, Müller T E. Green, turquoise, blue, or grey? Environmentally friendly hydrogen production in transforming energy systems Progress in Energy and Combustion Science. 2022;90:100996. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Bauer C, Treyer K, Antonini C, et al. On the climate impacts of blue hydrogen production. Sustainable Energy & Fuels. 2021;6(1):66–75. doi: 10.1039/D1SE01508G. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.van der Spek M, Banet C, Bauer C, et al. Perspective on the hydrogen economy as a pathway to reach net-zero CO2 emissions in Europe. Energy & Environmental Science. 2022;15(3):1034–1077. doi: 10.1039/D1EE02118D. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Howarth R W, Jacobson M Z. How green is blue hydrogen? Energy Science & Engineering. 2021;9(10):1676–1687. doi: 10.1002/ese3.956. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Yan Y, Thanganadar D, Clough P T, et al. Process simulations of blue hydrogen production by upgraded sorption enhanced steam methane reforming (SE-SMR) processes. Energy Conversion and Management. 2020;222:113144. doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2020.113144. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Lau H C. The color of energy: the competition to be the energy of the future. In: International Petroleum Technology Conference, 2021
  • 14.Yu M, Wang K, Vredenburg H. Insights into low-carbon hydrogen production methods: Green, blue and aqua hydrogen. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2021;46(41):21261–21273. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.04.016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ehlig-Economides C, Hatzignatiou D G. Blue hydrogen economy—A new look at an old idea. In: SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dubai, the UAE, 2021
  • 16.Bauer C, Treyer K, Antonini C, et al. On the climate impacts of blue hydrogen production. Sustainable Energy & Fuels. 2021;6(1):66–75. doi: 10.1039/D1SE01508G. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Newborough M, Cooley G. Developments in the global hydrogen market: the spectrum of hydrogen colours. Fuel Cells Bulletin. 2020;2020(11):16–22. doi: 10.1016/S1464-2859(20)30546-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Mosca L, Medrano Jimenez J A, Wassie S A, et al. Process design for green hydrogen production. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2020;45(12):7266–7277. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.08.206. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Palmer G, Roberts A, Hoadley A, et al. Life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions and net energy assessment of large-scale hydrogen production via electrolysis and solar PV. Energy & Environmental Science. 2021;14(10):5113–5131. doi: 10.1039/D1EE01288F. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Jin L, Monforti Ferrario A, Cigolotti V, et al. Evaluation of the impact of green hydrogen blending scenarios in the Italian gas network: Optimal design and dynamic simulation of operation strategies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Transition. 2022;2:100022. doi: 10.1016/j.rset.2022.100022. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Godula-Jopek A, Jehle W, Wellnitz J. Hydrogen Storage Technologies: New Materials, Transport, and Infrastructure. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons; 2012. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Zohuri B. Hydrogen Energy: Challenges and Solutions for a Cleaner Future. Cham: Springer; 2019. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Adris A M, Pruden B B, Lim C J, et al. On the reported attempts to radically improve the performance of the steam methane reforming reactor. Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering. 1996;74(2):177–186. doi: 10.1002/cjce.5450740202. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Oliveira E L G, Grande C A, Rodrigues A E. Effect of catalyst activity in SMR-SERP for hydrogen production: Commercial vs. large-pore catalyst. Chemical Engineering Science. 2011;66(3):342–354. doi: 10.1016/j.ces.2010.10.030. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Collodi G, Azzaro G, Ferrari N, et al. Techno-economic evaluation of deploying CCS in SMR based merchant H2 poduction with NG as feedstock and fuel. Energy Procedia. 2017;114:2690–2712. doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1533. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Stenberg V, Rydén M, Mattisson T, et al. Exploring novel hydrogen production processes by integration of steam methane reforming with chemical-looping combustion (CLC-SMR) and oxygen carrier aided combustion (OCAC-SMR) International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control. 2018;74:28–39. doi: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2018.01.008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Yan Y, Manovic V, Anthony E J, et al. Techno-economic analysis of low-carbon hydrogen production by sorption enhanced steam methane reforming (SE-SMR) processes. Energy Conversion and Management. 2020;226:113530. doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2020.113530. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Nikolaidis P, Poullikkas A. A comparative overview of hydrogen production processes. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2017;67:597–611. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.044. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.van der Spek M, Fout T, Garcia M, et al. Uncertainty analysis in the techno-economic assessment of CO2 capture and storage technologies. Critical review and guidelines for use. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control. 2020;100:103113. doi: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2020.103113. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Carapellucci R, Giordano L. Steam, dry and autothermal methane reforming for hydrogen production: A thermodynamic equilibrium analysis. Journal of Power Sources. 2020;469:228391. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.228391. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Chen H L, Lee H M, Chen S H, et al. Review of plasma catalysis on hydrocarbon reforming for hydrogen production-interaction, integration, and prospects. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental. 2008;85(1–2):1–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.LeValley T L, Richard A R, Fan M. The progress in water gas shift and steam reforming hydrogen production technologies—A review. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2014;39(30):16983–17000. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.08.041. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Liu C, Ye J, Jiang J, et al. Progresses in the preparation of coke resistant Ni-based catalyst for steam and CO2 reforming of methane. ChemCatChem. 2011;3(3):529–541. doi: 10.1002/cctc.201000358. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Yoo J, Bang Y, Han S J, et al. Hydrogen production by trireforming of methane over nickel–alumina aerogel catalyst. Journal of Molecular Catalysis A Chemical. 2015;410:74–80. doi: 10.1016/j.molcata.2015.09.008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Ersöz A. Investigation of hydrocarbon reforming processes for micro-cogeneration systems. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2008;33(23):7084–7094. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.07.062. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Scipioni A, Manzardo A, Ren J. Hydrogen Economy: Supply Chain, Life Cycle Analysis and Energy Transition for Sustainability. Academic Press, 2017
  • 37.Steinberg M, Cheng H C. Modern and prospective technologies for hydrogen production from fossil fuels. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 1989;14(11):797–820. doi: 10.1016/0360-3199(89)90018-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Faye O, Szpunar J, Eduok U. A critical review on the current technologies for the generation, storage, and transportation of hydrogen. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2022;47(29):13771–13802. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.02.112. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Holladay J D, Hu J, King D L, et al. An overview of hydrogen production technologies. Catalysis Today. 2009;139(4):244–260. doi: 10.1016/j.cattod.2008.08.039. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Dai H, Zhu H. Enhancement of partial oxidation reformer by the free-section addition for hydrogen production. Renewable Energy. 2022;190:425–433. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2022.03.124. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Caudal J, Fiorina B, Labégorre B, et al. Modeling interactions between chemistry and turbulence for simulations of partial oxidation processes. Fuel Processing Technology. 2015;134:231–242. doi: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2015.01.040. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Jahromi A F, Ruiz-López E, Dorado F, et al. Electrochemical promotion of ethanol partial oxidation and reforming reactions for hydrogen production. Renewable Energy. 2022;183:515–523. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2021.11.041. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Bartels J R, Pate M B, Olson N K. An economic survey of hydrogen production from conventional and alternative energy sources. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2010;35(16):8371–8384. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.04.035. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.De Falco L, Marrelli L, Laquaniello G. Membrane Reactors for Hydrogen Production Processes. London: Springer; 2011. [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Lattner J R, Harold M P. Comparison of conventional and membrane reactor fuel processors for hydrocarbon-based PEM fuel cell systems. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2004;29(4):393–417. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2003.10.013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Kim J, Park J, Qi M, et al. Process integration of an autothermal reforming hydrogen production system with cryogenic air separation and carbon dioxide capture using liquefied natural gas cold energy. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. 2021;60(19):7257–7274. doi: 10.1021/acs.iecr.0c06265. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Damen K, van Troost M, Faaij A, et al. A comparison of electricity and hydrogen production systems with CO2 capture and storage. Part A: Review and selection of promising conversion and capture technologies. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science. 2006;32(2):215–246. doi: 10.1016/j.pecs.2005.11.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Demirbaş A. Biomass resource facilities and biomass conversion processing for fuels and chemicals. Energy Conversion and Management. 2001;42(11):1357–1378. doi: 10.1016/S0196-8904(00)00137-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Krishnamoorthy V, Pisupati S V. A critical review of mineral matter related issues during gasification of coal in fixed, fluidized, and entrained flow gasifiers. Energies. 2015;8(9):10430–10463. doi: 10.3390/en80910430. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Jiang L, Chen Z, Farouq Ali S M. Thermal-hydrochemical-mechanical alteration of coal pores in underground coal gasification. Fuel. 2020;262:116543. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2019.116543. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Ma H, Chen S, Xue D, et al. Outlook for the coal industry and new coal production technologies. Advances in Geo-Energy Research. 2021;5(2):119–120. doi: 10.46690/ager.2021.02.01. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Jiang L, Xue D, Wei Z, et al. Coal decarbonization: a state-of-the-art review of enhanced hydrogen production in underground coal gasification. Energy Reviews. 2022;1(1):100004. doi: 10.1016/j.enrev.2022.100004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Perkins G. Underground coal gasification—Part I: Field demonstrations and process performance. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science. 2018;67:158–187. doi: 10.1016/j.pecs.2018.02.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Weger L, Abánades A, Butler T. Methane cracking as a bridge technology to the hydrogen economy. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2017;42(1):720–731. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.11.029. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Schneider S, Bajohr S, Graf F, et al. State of the art of hydrogen production via pyrolysis of natural gas. ChemBioEng Reviews. 2020;7(5):150–158. doi: 10.1002/cben.202000014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Plevan M, Geißler T, Abánades A, et al. Thermal cracking of methane in a liquid metal bubble column reactor: Experiments and kinetic analysis. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2015;40(25):8020–8033. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.04.062. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Geißler T, Abánades A, Heinzel A, et al. Hydrogen production via methane pyrolysis in a liquid metal bubble column reactor with a packed bed. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2016;299:192–200. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2016.04.066. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Sánchez-Bastardo N, Schlögl R, Ruland H. Methane pyrolysis for CO2–free H2 production: A green process to overcome renewable energies unsteadiness. Chemieingenieurtechnik (Weinheim) 2020;92(10):1596–1609. [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Ashik U P M, Wan Daud W M A, Abbas H F. Production of greenhouse gas free hydrogen by thermocatalytic decomposition of methane—A review. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2015;44:221–256. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2014.12.025. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Amin A M, Croiset E, Epling W. Review of methane catalytic cracking for hydrogen production. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2011;36(4):2904–2935. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.11.035. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Dagle R A, Dagle V, Bearden M D, et al. An Overview of Natural Gas Conversion Technologies for Co-production of Hydrogen and Value-added Solid Carbon Products. Technical Report, USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, 2017
  • 62.Guéret C, Daroux M, Billaud F. Methane pyrolysis: thermodynamics. Chemical Engineering Science. 1997;52(5):815–827. doi: 10.1016/S0009-2509(96)00444-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Muradov N, Veziroğlu T. From hydrocarbon to hydrogen-carbon to hydrogen economy. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2005;30(3):225–237. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2004.03.033. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Gautier M, Rohani V, Fulcheri L. Direct decarbonization of methane by thermal plasma for the production of hydrogen and high value-added carbon black. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2017;42(47):28140–28156. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.09.021. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Bakken J A, Jensen R, Monsen B, et al. Thermal plasma process development in Norway. Pure and Applied Chemistry. 1998;70(6):1223–1228. doi: 10.1351/pac199870061223. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Gaudernack B, Lynum S. Hydrogen from natural gas without release of CO2 to the atmosphere. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 1998;23(12):1087–1093. doi: 10.1016/S0360-3199(98)00004-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Pudukudy M, Yaakob Z, Takriff M S. Methane decomposition over unsupported mesoporous nickel ferrites: Effect of reaction temperature on the catalytic activity and properties of the produced nanocarbon. RSC Advances. 2016;6(72):68081–68091. doi: 10.1039/C6RA14660K. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Lee K K, Han G Y, Yoon K J, et al. Thermocatalytic hydrogen production from the methane in a fluidized bed with activated carbon catalyst. Catalysis Today. 2004;93–95:81–86. doi: 10.1016/j.cattod.2004.06.080. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Dunker A M, Kumar S, Mulawa P A. Production of hydrogen by thermal decomposition of methane in a fluidized-bed reactor—Effects of catalyst, temperature, and residence time. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2006;31(4):473–484. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2005.04.023. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Keipi T, Tolvanen H, Konttinen J. Economic analysis of hydrogen production by methane thermal decomposition: comparison to competing technologies. Energy Conversion and Management. 2018;159:264–273. doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2017.12.063. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Gatica J M, Cifredo G A, Blanco G, et al. Unveiling the source of activity of carbon integral honeycomb monoliths in the catalytic methane decomposition reaction. Catalysis Today. 2015;249:86–93. doi: 10.1016/j.cattod.2014.12.015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Gatica J M, Gómez D M, Harti S, et al. Monolithic honeycomb design applied to carbon materials for catalytic methane decomposition. Applied Catalysis A, General. 2013;458:21–27. doi: 10.1016/j.apcata.2013.03.016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Serban M, Lewis M A, Marshall C L, et al. Hydrogen production by direct contact pyrolysis of natural gas. Energy & Fuels. 2003;17(3):705–713. doi: 10.1021/ef020271q. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Geißler T, Plevan M, Abánades A, et al. Experimental investigation and thermo-chemical modeling of methane pyrolysis in a liquid metal bubble column reactor with a packed bed. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2015;40(41):14134–14146. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.08.102. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Kang D, Rahimi N, Gordon M J, et al. Catalytic methane pyrolysis in molten MnCl2-KCl. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental. 2019;254:659–666. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.05.026. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Palmer C, Tarazkar M, Kristoffersen H H, et al. Methane pyrolysis with a molten Cu–Bi alloy catalyst. ACS Catalysis. 2019;9(9):8337–8345. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.9b01833. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Upham D C, Agarwal V, Khechfe A, et al. Catalytic molten metals for the direct conversion of methane to hydrogen and separable carbon. Science. 2017;358(6365):917–921. doi: 10.1126/science.aao5023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Pudukudy M, Yaakob Z, Jia Q, et al. Catalytic decomposition of undiluted methane into hydrogen and carbon nanotubes over Pt promoted Ni/CeO2 catalysts. New Journal of Chemistry. 2018;42(18):14843–14856. doi: 10.1039/C8NJ02842G. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Bayat N, Rezaei M, Meshkani F. COx-free hydrogen and carbon nanofibers production by methane decomposition over nickel-alumina catalysts. Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering. 2016;33(2):490–499. doi: 10.1007/s11814-015-0183-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Bayat N, Rezaei M, Meshkani F. Hydrogen and carbon nanofibers synthesis by methane decomposition over Ni–Pd/Al2O3 catalyst. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2016;41(12):5494–5503. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.01.134. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Fakeeha A H, Ibrahim A A, Khan W U, et al. Hydrogen production via catalytic methane decomposition over alumina supported iron catalyst. Arabian Journal of Chemistry. 2018;11(3):405–414. doi: 10.1016/j.arabjc.2016.06.012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Avdeeva L B, Reshetenko T V, Ismagilov Z R, et al. Iron-containing catalysts of methane decomposition: Accumulation of filamentous carbon. Applied Catalysis A, General. 2002;228(1–2):53–63. doi: 10.1016/S0926-860X(01)00959-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Ayillath Kutteri D, Wang I W, Samanta A, et al. Methane decomposition to tip and base grown carbon nanotubes and COx-free H2 over mono-and bimetallic 3d transition metal catalysts. Catalysis Science & Technology. 2018;8(3):858–869. doi: 10.1039/C7CY01927K. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Silva R R, Oliveira H A, Guarino A C P F, et al. Effect of support on methane decomposition for hydrogen production over cobalt catalysts. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2016;41(16):6763–6772. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.02.101. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Pinilla J, Suelves I, Lázaro M, et al. Influence on hydrogen production of the minor components of natural gas during its decomposition using carbonaceous catalysts. Journal of Power Sources. 2009;192(1):100–106. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.12.074. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Zhang J, Li X, Chen H, et al. Hydrogen production by catalytic methane decomposition: Carbon materials as catalysts or catalyst supports. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2017;42(31):19755–19775. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.06.197. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Fidalgo B, Muradov N, Menéndez J. Effect of H2S on carbon-catalyzed methane decomposition and CO2 reforming reactions. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2012;37(19):14187–14194. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.07.090. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Guil-Lopez R, Botas J, Fierro J, et al. Comparison of metal and carbon catalysts for hydrogen production by methane decomposition. Applied Catalysis A, General. 2011;396(1–2):40–51. doi: 10.1016/j.apcata.2011.01.036. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Abánades A, Rubbia C, Salmieri D. Thermal cracking of methane into Hydrogen for a CO2-free utilization of natural gas. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2013;38(20):8491–8496. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.08.138. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Ermakova M, Ermakov D Y. Ni/SiO2 and Fe/SiO2 catalysts for production of hydrogen and filamentous carbon via methane decomposition. Catalysis Today. 2002;77(3):225–235. doi: 10.1016/S0920-5861(02)00248-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Ouyang M, Boldrin P, Maher R C, et al. A mechanistic study of the interactions between methane and nickel supported on doped ceria. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental. 2019;248:332–340. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.02.038. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Bayat N, Rezaei M, Meshkani F. Methane decomposition over Ni–Fe/Al2O3 catalysts for production of COx-free hydrogen and carbon nanofiber. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2016;41(3):1574–1584. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.10.053. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Rastegarpanah A, Rezaei M, Meshkani F, et al. Influence of group VIB metals on activity of the Ni/MgO catalysts for methane decomposition. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental. 2019;248:515–525. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.01.067. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Bayat N, Meshkani F, Rezaei M. Thermocatalytic decomposition of methane to COx-free hydrogen and carbon over Ni–Fe–Cu/Al2O3 catalysts. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2016;41(30):13039–13049. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.05.230. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Al-Fatesh A S, Fakeeha A H, Ibrahim A A, et al. Decomposition of methane over alumina supported Fe and Ni–Fe bimetallic catalyst: Effect of preparation procedure and calcination temperature. Journal of Saudi Chemical Society. 2018;22(2):239–247. doi: 10.1016/j.jscs.2016.05.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Moliner R, Suelves I, Lázaro M, et al. Thermocatalytic decomposition of methane over activated carbons: Influence of textural properties and surface chemistry. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2005;30(3):293–300. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2004.03.035. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Lee E K, Lee S Y, Han G Y, et al. Catalytic decomposition of methane over carbon blacks for CO2-free hydrogen production. Carbon. 2004;42(12–13):2641–2648. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2004.06.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Takenaka S, Ogihara H, Yamanaka I, et al. Decomposition of methane over supported-Ni catalysts: Effects of the supports on the catalytic lifetime. Applied Catalysis A, General. 2001;217(1–2):101–110. doi: 10.1016/S0926-860X(01)00593-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Zhang J, Li X, Xie W, et al. K2CO3-promoted methane pyrolysis on nickel/coal-char hybrids. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis. 2018;136:53–61. doi: 10.1016/j.jaap.2018.11.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Parkinson B, Tabatabaei M, Upham D C, et al. Hydrogen production using methane: techno-economics of decarbonizing fuels and chemicals. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2018;43(5):2540–2555. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.12.081. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Abánades A, Ruiz E, Ferruelo E M, et al. Experimental analysis of direct thermal methane cracking. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2011;36(20):12877–12886. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.07.081. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Abánades A, Rathnam R K, Geißler T, et al. Development of methane decarbonisation based on liquid metal technology for CO2-free production of hydrogen. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2016;41(19):8159–8167. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.11.164. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Zhou L, Enakonda L R, Li S, et al. Iron ore catalysts for methane decomposition to make COx free hydrogen and carbon nano material. Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers. 2018;87:54–63. doi: 10.1016/j.jtice.2018.03.008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Pudukudy M, Yaakob Z. Methane decomposition over Ni, Co and Fe based monometallic catalysts supported on sol gel derived SiO2 microflakes. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2015;262:1009–1021. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2014.10.077. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Ermakova M, Ermakov D Y, Kuvshinov G. Effective catalysts for direct cracking of methane to produce hydrogen and filamentous carbon: Part I. Nickel catalysts. Applied Catalysis A, General. 2000;201(1):61–70. doi: 10.1016/S0926-860X(00)00433-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Al-Fatesh A S, Amin A, Ibrahim A, et al. Effect of Ce and Co addition to Fe/Al2O3 for catalytic methane decomposition. Catalysts. 2016;6(3):40. doi: 10.3390/catal6030040. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Wang J, Jin L, Li Y, et al. Preparation of Fe-doped carbon catalyst for methane decomposition to hydrogen. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. 2017;56(39):11021–11027. doi: 10.1021/acs.iecr.7b02394. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Zhou L, Enakonda L R, Saih Y, et al. Catalytic methane decomposition over Fe-Al2O3. ChemSusChem. 2016;9(11):1243–1248. doi: 10.1002/cssc.201600310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Cunha A, Órfão J, Figueiredo J. Methane decomposition on Fe-Cu Raney-type catalysts. Fuel Processing Technology. 2009;90(10):1234–1240. doi: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2009.06.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Schultz I, Agar D W. Decarbonisation of fossil energy via methane pyrolysis using two reactor concepts: Fluid wall flow reactor and molten metal capillary reactor. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2015;40(35):11422–11427. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.03.126. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Postels S, Abánades A, von der Assen N, et al. Life cycle assessment of hydrogen production by thermal cracking of methane based on liquid-metal technology. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2016;41(48):23204–23212. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.09.167. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Voll M, Kleinschmit P. Carbon, 6. Carbon Black. In: Elvers B, editor. Ullmann’s Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry. Hoboken: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co; 2000. [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Fau G, Gascoin N, Gillard P, et al. Methane pyrolysis: literature survey and comparisons of available data for use in numerical simulations. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis. 2013;104:1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jaap.2013.04.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.International Energy Agency. Global Energy & CO2 Status Report 2019. Technical Report, IEA, 2019
  • 115.International Energy Agency. The Future of Hydrogen. Technical Report, IEA, 2019
  • 116.International Energy Agency. Achieving Net Zero Heavy Industry Sectors in G7 Members. Technical Report, IEA, 2022
  • 117.White C M, Strazisar B R, Granite E J, et al. Separation and capture of CO2 from large stationary sources and sequestration in geological formations–coalbeds and deep saline aquifers. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association. 2003;53(6):645–715. doi: 10.1080/10473289.2003.10466206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Riahi K, Rubin E S, Schrattenholzer L. Prospects for carbon capture and sequestration technologies assuming their technological learning. Energy. 2004;29(9–10):1309–1318. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2004.03.089. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Davidson O, Metz B. Special Report on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage. Technical Report, IPCC, 2005
  • 120.Middleton R, Ogland-Hand J, et al. Identifying geologic characteristics and operational decisions to meet global carbon sequestration goals. Energy & Environmental Science. 2020;13(12):5000–5016. doi: 10.1039/D0EE02488K. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Chaffee A L, Knowles G P, Liang Z, et al. CO2 capture by adsorption: materials and process development. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control. 2007;1(1):11–18. doi: 10.1016/S1750-5836(07)00031-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Bachu S, Bonijoly D, Bradshaw J, et al. CO2 storage capacity estimation: methodology and gaps. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control. 2007;1(4):43–443. doi: 10.1016/S1750-5836(07)00086-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Faltinson J, Gunter B. Integrated economic model CO2 capture, transport, ECBM and saline aquifer storage. Energy Procedia. 2009;1(1):4001–4005. doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2009.02.205. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.MacDowell N, Florin N, Buchard A, et al. An overview of CO2 capture technologies. Energy & Environmental Science. 2010;3(11):1645. doi: 10.1039/c004106h. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Yu C H, Huang C H, Tan C S. A review of CO2 capture by absorption and adsorption. Aerosol and Air Quality Research. 2012;12(5):745–769. doi: 10.4209/aaqr.2012.05.0132. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Morgan M G, McCoy S T. Carbon Capture and Sequestration: Removing the Legal and Regulatory Barriers. New York: Routledge; 2012. [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Espinal L, Poster D L, Wong-Ng W, et al. Measurement, standards, and data needs for CO2 capture materials: A critical review. Environmental Science & Technology. 2013;47(21):11960–11975. doi: 10.1021/es402622q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Rubin E S, Short C, Booras G, et al. A proposed methodology for CO2 capture and storage cost estimates. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control. 2013;17:488–503. doi: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2013.06.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Zhang X, Fan J L, Wei Y M. Technology roadmap study on carbon capture, utilization and storage in China. Energy Policy. 2013;59:536–550. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.04.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Leung D Y C, Caramanna G, Maroto-Valer M M. An overview of current status of carbon dioxide capture and storage technologies. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2014;39:426–443. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.093. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Allinson W G G, Cinar Y, Neal P R R, et al. CO2-storage capacity—Combining geology, engineering and economics. SPE Economics & Management. 2014;6(1):15–27. doi: 10.2118/133804-PA. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Ma H, Yang Y, Zhang Y, et al. Optimized schemes of enhanced shale gas recovery by CO2-N2 mixtures associated with CO2 sequestration. Energy Conversion and Management. 2022;268:116062. doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2022.116062. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Ma H, McCoy S, Chen Z. Economic and engineering co-optimization of CO2 storage and enhanced oil recovery. In: Proceedings of the 16th Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies Conference, Lyon, France, 2022
  • 134.International Energy Agency. Global Energy and CO2 Status Report 2018. Technical Report, IEA, 2018
  • 135.Global CCS Institute. Global Status of CCS 2020. Technical Report, Global CCS Institute, 2020
  • 136.British Petroleum. Statistical Review of World Energy 2021. Technical Report, BP, 2021
  • 137.Bui M, Adjiman C S, Bardow A, et al. Carbon capture and storage (CCS): The way forward. Energy & Environmental Science. 2018;11(5):1064–1065. doi: 10.1039/C7EE02342A. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Future Global Climate: Scenario-based Projections and Near Term Information. Technical Report, IPCC, 2021
  • 139.International Renewable Energy Agency. World Energy Transitions Outlook. Technical Report, IRENA, 2022
  • 140.International Renewable Energy Agency. Hydrogen: A Renewable Energy Perspective. Technical Report, IRENA, 2019
  • 141.Song C, Liu Q, Ji N, et al. Alternative pathways for efficient CO2 capture by hybrid processes—A review. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2018;82:215–231. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.09.040. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Wang X, Song C. Carbon capture from flue gas and the atmosphere: A perspective. Frontiers in Energy Research. 2020;8:560849. doi: 10.3389/fenrg.2020.560849. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Evans T, Grynia E. Carbon capture-purpose and technologies. 2020, available at website of gasliquids
  • 144.Sekera J, Lichtenberger A. Assessing carbon capture: Public policy, science, and societal need. Biophysical Economics and Sustainability. 2020;5(3):14. doi: 10.1007/s41247-020-00080-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Wei Y M, Kang J N, Liu L C, et al. A proposed global layout of carbon capture and storage in line with a 2 °C climate target. Nature Climate Change. 2021;11(2):112–118. doi: 10.1038/s41558-020-00960-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Becattini V, Gabrielli P, Mazzotti M. Role of carbon capture, storage, and utilization to enable a net-zero-CO2-emissions aviation sector. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. 2021;60(18):6848–6862. doi: 10.1021/acs.iecr.0c05392. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Zhang K, Bokka H K, Lau H C. Decarbonizing the energy and industry sectors in Thailand by carbon capture and storage. Journal of Petroleum Science Engineering. 2022;209:109979. doi: 10.1016/j.petrol.2021.109979. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Hao Z, Barecka M H, Lapkin A A. Accelerating net zero from the perspective of optimizing a carbon capture and utilization system. Energy & Environmental Science. 2022;15(5):2139–2153. doi: 10.1039/D1EE03923G. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Brandl P, Bui M, Hallett J P, et al. Beyond 90% capture: Possible, but at what cost? International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control. 2021;105:103239. doi: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2020.103239. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Ostovari H, Muller L, Skocek J, et al. From unavoidable CO2 source to CO2 sink? A cement industry based on CO2 mineralization. Environmental Science & Technology. 2021;55(8):5212–5223. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.0c07599. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Sun S, Sun H, Williams P T, et al. Recent advances in integrated CO2 capture and utilization: A review. Sustainable Energy & Fuels. 2021;5(18):4546–4559. doi: 10.1039/D1SE00797A. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Wang N, Akimoto K, Nemet G F. What went wrong? Learning from three decades of carbon capture, utilization and sequestration (CCUS) pilot and demonstration projects. Energy Policy. 2021;158:112546. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112546. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Hanein T, Simoni M, Woo C L, et al. Decarbonisation of calcium carbonate at atmospheric temperatures and pressures, with simultaneous CO2 capture, through production of sodium carbonate. Energy & Environmental Science. 2021;14(12):6595–6604. doi: 10.1039/D1EE02637B. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Subraveti S G, Roussanaly S, Anantharaman R, et al. How much can novel solid sorbents reduce the cost of post-combustion CO2 capture? A techno-economic investigation on the cost limits of pressure–vacuum swing adsorption. Applied Energy. 2022;306:117955. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117955. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Mohsin I, Al-Attas T A, Sumon K Z, et al. Economic and environmental assessment of integrated carbon capture and utilization. Cell Reports Physical Science. 2020;1(7):100104. doi: 10.1016/j.xcrp.2020.100104. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Dake L P. Fundamentals of Reservoir Engineering. Elsevier Science, 1983
  • 157.Balogun H A, Bahamon D, AlMenhali S, et al. Are we missing something when evaluating adsorbents for CO2 capture at the system level? Energy & Environmental Science. 2021;14(12):6360–6380. doi: 10.1039/D1EE01677F. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Dixon J, Bell K, Brush S. Which way to net zero? A comparative analysis of seven UK 2050 decarbonisation pathways. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Transition. 2022;2:100016. doi: 10.1016/j.rset.2021.100016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Adams B, Sutter D, Mazzotti M, et al. Combining direct air capture and geothermal heat and electricity generation for net-negative carbon dioxide emissions. In: Proceedings of the World Geothermal Congress, Reykjavik, Iceland, 2020
  • 160.Deutz S, Bardow A. Life-cycle assessment of an industrial direct air capture process based on temperature–vacuum swing adsorption. Nature Energy. 2021;6(2):203–213. doi: 10.1038/s41560-020-00771-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 161.McQueen N, Gomes K V, McCormick C, et al. A review of direct air capture (DAC): Scaling up commercial technologies and innovating for the future. Progress in Energy. 2021;3(3):032001. doi: 10.1088/2516-1083/abf1ce. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 162.McQueen N, Desmond M J, Socolow R H, et al. Natural gas vs. electricity for solvent-based direct air capture. Frontiers in Climate. 2021;2:618644. doi: 10.3389/fclim.2020.618644. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 163.Bistline J E T, Blanford G J. Impact of carbon dioxide removal technologies on deep decarbonization of the electric power sector. Nature Communications. 2021;12(1):3732. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-23554-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164.Terlouw T, Treyer K, Bauer C, et al. Life cycle assessment of direct air carbon capture and storage with low-carbon energy sources. Environmental Science & Technology. 2021;55(16):11397–11411. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.1c03263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165.Erans M, Sanz-Pérez E S, Hanak D P, et al. Direct air capture: process technology, techno-economic and socio-political challenges. Energy & Environmental Science. 2022;15(4):1360–1405. doi: 10.1039/D1EE03523A. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 166.International Energy Agency. Direct Air Capture. Technical Report, IEA, 2022
  • 167.McQueen N, Psarras P, Pilorgé H, et al. Cost analysis of direct air capture and sequestration coupled to low-carbon thermal energy in the United States. Environmental Science & Technology. 2020;54(12):7542–7551. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.0c00476. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168.International Energy Agency. Canada 2022. Technical Report, IEA, 2022
  • 169.Congressional Research Service. The Tax Credit for Carbon Sequestration (Section 45Q). Technical Report, CRS, 2021
  • 170.Collidi G. Reference Data and Supporting Literature Reviews for SMR Based Hydrogen Production with CCS. Technical Report, IEAGHG, 2017
  • 171.Mathiesen B V, Lund H, Karlsson K. 100% renewable energy systems, climate mitigation and economic growth. Applied Energy. 2011;88(2):488–501. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.03.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 172.Flamos A, Georgallis P, Doukas H, et al. Using biomass to achieve European Union Energy Targets—A review of biomass status, potential, and supporting policies. International Journal of Green Energy. 2011;8(4):411–428. doi: 10.1080/15435075.2011.576292. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 173.Demirbaş A. Yields of hydrogen-rich gaseous products via pyrolysis from selected biomass samples. Fuel. 2001;80(13):1885–1891. doi: 10.1016/S0016-2361(01)00070-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 174.Parthasarathy P, Narayanan K S. Hydrogen production from steam gasification of biomass: influence of process parameters on hydrogen yield—A review. Renewable Energy. 2014;66:570–579. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2013.12.025. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 175.Fremaux S, Beheshti S M, Ghassemi H, et al. An experimental study on hydrogen-rich gas production via steam gasification of biomass in a research-scale fluidized bed. Energy Conversion and Management. 2015;91:427–432. doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2014.12.048. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 176.Balat M. Hydrogen-rich gas production from biomass via pyrolysis and gasification processes and effects of catalyst on hydrogen yield. Energy Sources. Part A, Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects. 2008;30(6):552–564. doi: 10.1080/15567030600817191. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 177.Ni M, Leung D Y, Leung M K, et al. An overview of hydrogen production from biomass. Fuel Processing Technology. 2006;87(5):461–472. doi: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2005.11.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 178.Godula-Jopek A. Hydrogen Production: By Electrolysis. John Wiley & Sons, 2015
  • 179.Rakousky C, Reimer U, Wippermann K, et al. Polymer electrolyte membrane water electrolysis: Restraining degradation in the presence of fluctuating power. Journal of Power Sources. 2017;342:38–47. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.11.118. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 180.Khan M A, Al-Attas T, Roy S, et al. Seawater electrolysis for hydrogen production: A solution looking for a problem? Energy & Environmental Science. 2021;14(9):4831–4839. doi: 10.1039/D1EE00870F. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 181.Zhang Y, Ying Z, Zhou J, et al. Electrolysis of the Bunsen reaction and properties of the membrane in the sulfur–iodine thermochemical cycle. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. 2014;53(35):13581–13588. doi: 10.1021/ie502275s. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 182.Rossmeisl J, Logadottir A, Nørskov J K. Electrolysis of water on (oxidized) metal surfaces. Chemical Physics. 2005;319(1–3):178–184. doi: 10.1016/j.chemphys.2005.05.038. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 183.Levene J I, Mann M K, Margolis R M, et al. An analysis of hydrogen production from renewable electricity sources. Solar Energy. 2007;81(6):773–780. doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2006.10.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 184.Khan S U, Al-Shahry M, Ingler W B., Jr. Efficient photochemical water splitting by a chemically modified n-TiO2. Science. 2002;297(5590):2243–2245. doi: 10.1126/science.1075035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 185.Yan Z, Hitt J L, Turner J A, et al. Renewable electricity storage using electrolysis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2020;117(23):12558–12563. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1821686116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 186.Chatenet M, Pollet B G, Dekel D R, et al. Water electrolysis: from textbook knowledge to the latest scientific strategies and industrial developments. Chemical Society Reviews. 2022;51(11):4583–4762. doi: 10.1039/D0CS01079K. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 187.Nnabuife S G, Ugbeh-Johnson J, Okeke N E, et al. Present and projected developments in hydrogen production: A technological review. Carbon Capture Science & Technology, 2022, 100042
  • 188.Xie H, Zhao Z, Liu T, et al. A membrane-based seawater electrolyser for hydrogen generation. Nature. 2022;612(7941):673–678. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05379-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 189.Diéguez P, Ursúa A, Sanchis P, et al. Thermal performance of a commercial alkaline water electrolyzer: Experimental study and mathematical modeling. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2008;33(24):7338–7354. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.09.051. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 190.Zeng K, Zhang D. Recent progress in alkaline water electrolysis for hydrogen production and applications. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science. 2010;36(3):307–326. doi: 10.1016/j.pecs.2009.11.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 191.Funk J E. Thermochemical hydrogen production: Past and present. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2001;26(3):185–190. doi: 10.1016/S0360-3199(00)00062-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 192.Orhan M F, Dincer I, Rosen M A. Energy and exergy assessments of the hydrogen production step of a copper–chlorine thermochemical water splitting cycle driven by nuclear-based heat. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2008;33(22):6456–6466. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.08.035. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 193.Abanades S, Charvin P, Lemont F, et al. Novel two-step SnO2/SnO water-splitting cycle for solar thermochemical production of hydrogen. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2008;33(21):6021–6030. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.05.042. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 194.Ratlamwala T, Dincer I. Comparative energy and exergy analyses of two solar-based integrated hydrogen production systems. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2015;40(24):7568–7578. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.10.123. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 195.Schultz K R. Use of the Modular Helium Reactor for Hydrogen Production. General Atomics Report: GA-A24428, 2003
  • 196.Orhan M, Dincer I, Naterer G. Cost analysis of a thermochemical Cu-Cl pilot plant for nuclear-based hydrogen production. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2008;33(21):6006–6020. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.05.038. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 197.Charvin P, Stéphane A, Florent L, et al. Analysis of solar chemical processes for hydrogen production from water splitting thermochemical cycles. Energy Conversion and Management. 2008;49(6):1547–1556. doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2007.12.011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 198.Kothari R, Buddhi D, Sawhney R. Comparison of environmental and economic aspects of various hydrogen production methods. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2008;12(2):553–563. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2006.07.012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 199.Navarro R M, Pena M, Fierro J. Hydrogen production reactions from carbon feedstocks: Fossil fuels and biomass. Chemical Reviews. 2007;107(10):3952–3991. doi: 10.1021/cr0501994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 200.Laurinavichene T V, Kosourov S N, Ghirardi M L, et al. Prolongation of H2 photoproduction by immobilized, sulfur-limited Chlamydomonas reinhardtii cultures. Journal of Biotechnology. 2008;134(3–4):275–277. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2008.01.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 201.Kovács K L, Maróti G, Rákhely G. A novel approach for biohydrogen production. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2006;31(11):1460–1468. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2006.06.011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 202.Bak T, Nowotny J, Rekas M, et al. Photo-electrochemical properties of the TiO2-Pt system in aqueous solutions. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2002;27(1):19–26. doi: 10.1016/S0360-3199(01)00090-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 203.Aroutiounian V, Arakelyan V, Shahnazaryan G. Metal oxide photoelectrodes for hydrogen generation using solar radiation-driven water splitting. Solar Energy. 2005;78(5):581–592. doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2004.02.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 204.Akikusa J, Khan S U. Photoelectrolysis of water to hydrogen in p-SiC/Pt and p-SiC/n-TiO2 cells. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2002;27(9):863–870. doi: 10.1016/S0360-3199(01)00191-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 205.Ibrahim M N M, Koederitz L F. Two-phase relative permeability prediction using a linear regression model. In: SPE Eastern Regional Meeting, West Virginia, USA, 2000
  • 206.Züttel A. Materials for hydrogen storage. Materials Today. 2003;6(9):24–33. doi: 10.1016/S1369-7021(03)00922-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 207.Ogden J, Jaffe A M, Scheitrum D, et al. Natural gas as a bridge to hydrogen transportation fuel: Insights from the literature. Energy Policy. 2018;115:317–329. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.12.049. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 208.Conte M, Iacobazzi A, Ronchetti M, et al. Hydrogen economy for a sustainable development: State-of-the-art and technological perspectives. Journal of Power Sources. 2001;100(1–2):171–187. doi: 10.1016/S0378-7753(01)00893-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 209.Krishna R, Titus E, Salimian M, et al. Hydrogen storage for energy application. In: Liu J, et al., editors. Hydrogen Storage. London: IntechOpen; 2012. [Google Scholar]
  • 210.Barthélémy H, Weber M, Barbier F. Hydrogen storage: recent improvements and industrial perspectives. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2017;42(11):7254–7262. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.03.178. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 211.Okada Y, Sasaki E, Watanabe E, et al. Development of dehydrogenation catalyst for hydrogen generation in organic chemical hydride method. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2006;31(10):1348–1356. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2005.11.014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 212.Lan R, Irvine J T S, Tao S. Ammonia and related chemicals as potential indirect hydrogen storage materials. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2012;37(2):1482–1494. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.10.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 213.He T, Pei Q, Chen P. Liquid organic hydrogen carriers. Journal of Energy Chemistry. 2015;24(5):587–594. doi: 10.1016/j.jechem.2015.08.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 214.Clot E, Eisenstein O, Crabtree R H. Computational structure–activity relationships in H2 storage: How placement of N atoms affects release temperatures in organic liquid storage materials. Chemical Communications (Cambridge), 2007 (22), 2231–2233 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 215.Forberg D, Schwob T, Zaheer M, et al. Single-catalyst high-weight% hydrogen storage in an N-heterocycle synthesized from lignin hydrogenolysis products and ammonia. Nature Communications. 2016;7(1):13201. doi: 10.1038/ncomms13201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 216.Fujita K, Tanaka Y, Kobayashi M, et al. Homogeneous perdehydrogenation and perhydrogenation of fused bicyclic N-heterocycles catalyzed by iridium complexes bearing a functional bipyridonate ligand. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2014;136(13):4829–4832. doi: 10.1021/ja5001888. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 217.Luo W, Zakharov L N, Liu S Y. 1, 2-BN cyclohexane: Synthesis, structure, dynamics, and reactivity. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2011;133(33):13006–13009. doi: 10.1021/ja206497x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 218.Luo W, Campbell P G, Zakharov L N, et al. A single-component liquid-phase hydrogen storage material. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2011;133(48):19326–19329. doi: 10.1021/ja208834v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 219.Brückner N, Obesser K, Bösmann A, et al. Evaluation of Industrially applied heat-transfer fluids as liquid organic hydrogen carrier systems. ChemSusChem. 2014;7(1):229–235. doi: 10.1002/cssc.201300426. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 220.Enthaler S, von Langermann J, Schmidt T. Carbon dioxide and formic acid—The couple for environmental-friendly hydrogen storage? Energy & Environmental Science. 2010;3(9):1207–1217. doi: 10.1039/b907569k. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 221.Grasemann M, Laurenczy G. Formic acid as a hydrogen source–recent developments and future trends. Energy & Environmental Science. 2012;5(8):8171–8181. doi: 10.1039/c2ee21928j. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 222.Veziroglu T N, Zaginaichenko S Y, Schur D V, et al. Hydrogen materials science and chemistry of carbon nanomaterials. In: Proceedings of the NATO Advanced Research Workshop on Hydrogen Materials Science and Chemistry of Carbon Nanomaterials, Sudak, 2006
  • 223.Babarit A, Gilloteaux J C, Clodic G, et al. Techno-economic feasibility of fleets of far offshore hydrogen-producing wind energy converters. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2018;43(15):7266–7289. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.02.144. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 224.Blackstock E. Kawasaki launches the world’s first liquid hydrogen transport ship. 2019-12-15, available at website of newatlas
  • 225.Pan B, Yin X, Ju Y, et al. Underground hydrogen storage: influencing parameters and future outlook. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science. 2021;294:102473. doi: 10.1016/j.cis.2021.102473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 226.Zheng J, Liu X, Xu P, et al. Development of high pressure gaseous hydrogen storage technologies. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2012;37(1):1048–1057. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.02.125. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 227.Zhou L. Progress and problems in hydrogen storage methods. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2005;9(4):395–408. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2004.05.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 228.Sakintuna B, Lamari-Darkrim F, Hirscher M. Metal hydride materials for solid hydrogen storage: a review. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2007;32(9):1121–1140. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2006.11.022. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 229.Schulz R, Huot J, Liang G X, et al. Structure and hydrogen sorption properties of ball milled Mg dihydride. Journal of Metastable and Nanocrystalline Materials. 1999;2:615–622. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/JMNM.2-6.615. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 230.Niaz S, Manzoor T, Pandith A H. Hydrogen storage: Materials, methods and perspectives. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2015;50:457–469. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.05.011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 231.David E. An overview of advanced materials for hydrogen storage. Journal of Materials Processing Technology. 2005;162–163:169–177. doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.02.027. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 232.Grochala W, Edwards P P. Thermal decomposition of the non-interstitial hydrides for the storage and production of hydrogen. Chemical Reviews. 2004;104(3):1283–1316. doi: 10.1021/cr030691s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 233.Huot J, Liang G, Boily S, et al. Structural study and hydrogen sorption kinetics of ball-milled magnesium hydride. Journal of Alloys and Compounds. 1999;293–295:495–500. doi: 10.1016/S0925-8388(99)00474-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 234.Darkrim F L, Malbrunot P, Tartaglia G. Review of hydrogen storage by adsorption in carbon nanotubes. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2002;27(2):193–202. doi: 10.1016/S0360-3199(01)00103-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 235.Darkrim F, Levesque D. High adsorptive property of opened carbon nanotubes at 77 K. Journal of Physical Chemistry B. 2000;104(29):6773–6776. doi: 10.1021/jp0006532. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 236.Dillon A, Heben M. Hydrogen storage using carbon adsorbents: past, present and future. Applied Physics. A, Materials Science & Processing. 2001;72(2):133–142. doi: 10.1007/s003390100788. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 237.Chen P, Wu X, Lin J, et al. High H2 uptake by alkali-doped carbon nanotubes under ambient pressure and moderate temperatures. Science. 1999;285(5424):91–93. doi: 10.1126/science.285.5424.91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 238.Chen C H, Huang C C. Hydrogen storage by KOH-modified multi-walled carbon nanotubes. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2007;32(2):237–246. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2006.03.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 239.Zhao Q, Yuan W, Liang J, et al. Synthesis and hydrogen storage studies of metal–organic framework UiO-66. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2013;38(29):13104–13109. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.01.163. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 240.Li J, Cheng S, Zhao Q, et al. Synthesis and hydrogen-storage behavior of metal–organic framework MOF-5. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2009;34(3):1377–1382. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.11.048. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 241.Xia L, Liu Q, Wang F, et al. Improving the hydrogen storage properties of metal-organic framework by functionalization. Journal of Molecular Modeling. 2016;22(10):254. doi: 10.1007/s00894-016-3129-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 242.Bobbitt N S, Chen J, Snurr R Q. High-throughput screening of metal–organic frameworks for hydrogen storage at cryogenic temperature. Journal of Physical Chemistry C. 2016;120(48):27328–27341. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b08729. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 243.Ozturk Z, Kose D A, Sahin Z S, et al. Novel 2D micro-porous metal-organic framework for hydrogen storage. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2016;41(28):12167–12174. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.05.170. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 244.Railey P, Song Y, Liu T, et al. Metal organic frameworks with immobilized nanoparticles: Synthesis and applications in photocatalytic hydrogen generation and energy storage. Materials Research Bulletin. 2017;96:385–394. doi: 10.1016/j.materresbull.2017.04.020. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 245.Rahali S, Belhocine Y, Seydou M, et al. Multiscale study of the structure and hydrogen storage capacity of an aluminum metal-organic framework. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2017;42(22):15271–15282. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.04.258. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 246.Chen Z, Chen J, Li Y. Metal–organic-framework-based catalysts for hydrogenation reactions. Chinese Journal of Catalysis. 2017;38(7):1108–1126. doi: 10.1016/S1872-2067(17)62852-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 247.Tarkowski R. Underground hydrogen storage: characteristics and prospects. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2019;105:86–94. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2019.01.051. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 248.Lankof L, Urbańczyk K, Tarkowski R. Assessment of the potential for underground hydrogen storage in salt domes. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2022;160:112309. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2022.112309. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 249.Lankof L, Tarkowski R. Assessment of the potential for underground hydrogen storage in bedded salt formation. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2020;45(38):19479–19492. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.05.024. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 250.Sáinz-García A, Abarca E, Rubí V, et al. Assessment of feasible strategies for seasonal underground hydrogen storage in a saline aquifer. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2017;42(26):16657–16666. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.05.076. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 251.Hemme C, Van Berk W. Hydrogeochemical modeling to identify potential risks of underground hydrogen storage in depleted gas fields. Applied Sciences (Basel, Switzerland) 2018;8(11):2282. [Google Scholar]
  • 252.Rosa L, Mazzotti M. Potential for hydrogen production from sustainable biomass with carbon capture and storage. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2022;157:112123. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2022.112123. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 253.English J M, English K L. An overview of carbon capture and storage and its potential role in the energy transition. First Break. 2022;40(4):35–40. doi: 10.3997/1365-2397.fb2022028. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 254.Agaton C B, Batac K I T, Reyes E M., Jr. Prospects and challenges for green hydrogen production and utilization in the Philippines. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2022;47(41):17859–17870. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.04.101. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 255.Ahmed A, Al-Amin A Q, Ambrose A F, et al. Hydrogen fuel and transport system: A sustainable and environmental future. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2016;41(3):1369–1380. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.11.084. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 256.Ball M, Wietschel M. The future of hydrogen–opportunities and challenges. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2009;34(2):615–627. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.11.014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 257.Li Y, Taghizadeh-Hesary F. The economic feasibility of green hydrogen and fuel cell electric vehicles for road transport in China. Energy Policy. 2022;160:112703. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112703. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 258.International Energy Agency. Hydrogen Projects Database. Technical Report, IEA, 2021
  • 259.Ratnakar R R, Gupta N, Zhang K, et al. Hydrogen supply chain and challenges in large-scale LH2 storage and transportation. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2021;46(47):24149–24168. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.05.025. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 260.Scott R B, Denton W H, Nicholls C M. Technology and Uses of Liquid Hydrogen. Pergamon: Elsevier; 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • 261.Zhang K, Lau H C, Chen Z. Using blue hydrogen to decarbonize heavy oil and oil sands operations in Canada. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering. 2022;10(30):10003–10013. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.2c02691. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 262.International Energy Agency. Global Hydrogen Review. Technical Report, IEA, 2022
  • 263.Schoots K, Ferioli F, Kramer G, et al. Learning curves for hydrogen production technology: An assessment of observed cost reductions. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2008;33(11):2630–2645. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.03.011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 264.Pastore L M, Lo Basso G, Sforzini M, et al. Technical, economic and environmental issues related to electrolysers capacity targets according to the Italian Hydrogen Strategy: A critical analysis. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2022;166:112685. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2022.112685. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 265.Lane B, Reed J, Shaffer B, et al. Forecasting renewable hydrogen production technology shares under cost uncertainty. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2021;46(54):27293–27306. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.06.012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 266.US Department of Education. DOE technical targets for hydrogen production from electrolysis. 2022–10, available at website of energy government
  • 267.Zhang X, Bauer C, Mutel C L, et al. Life cycle assessment of power-to-gas: Approaches, system variations and their environmental implications. Applied Energy. 2017;190:326–338. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.12.098. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 268.Algunaibet I M, Guillén-Gosálbez G. Life cycle burden-shifting in energy systems designed to minimize greenhouse gas emissions: Novel analytical method and application to the United States. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2019;229:886–901. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.276. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 269.González-Garay A, Frei M S, Al-Qahtani A, et al. Plant-to-planet analysis of CO2-based methanol processes. Energy & Environmental Science. 2019;12(12):3425–3436. doi: 10.1039/C9EE01673B. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 270.Parkinson B, Balcombe P, Speirs J, et al. Levelized cost of CO2 mitigation from hydrogen production routes. Energy & Environmental Science. 2019;12(1):19–40. doi: 10.1039/C8EE02079E. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 271.Sleep S, Munjal R, Leitch M, et al. Carbon footprinting of carbon capture and utilization technologies: Discussion of the analysis of carbon XPRIZE competition team finalists. Clean Energy. 2021;5(4):587–599. doi: 10.1093/ce/zkab039. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 272.Motazedi K, Salkuyeh Y K, Laurenzi I J, et al. Economic and environmental competitiveness of high temperature electrolysis for hydrogen production. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2021;46(41):21274–21288. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.03.226. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 273.Liu C M, Sandhu N K, McCoy S T, et al. A life cycle assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from direct air capture and Fischer–Tropsch fuel production. Sustainable Energy & Fuels. 2020;4(6):3129–3142. doi: 10.1039/C9SE00479C. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 274.Kolb S, Plankenbühler T, Hofmann K, et al. Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of renewable gas technologies: A comparative review. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2021;146:111147. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2021.111147. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 275.Bergerson J A, Brandt A, Cresko J, et al. Life cycle assessment of emerging technologies: Evaluation techniques at different stages of market and technical maturity. Journal of Industrial Ecology. 2020;24(1):11–25. doi: 10.1111/jiec.12954. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 276.Bergerson J, Cucurachi S, Seager T P. Bringing a life cycle perspective to emerging technology development. Journal of Industrial Ecology. 2020;24(1):6–10. doi: 10.1111/jiec.12990. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Frontiers in Energy are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES