Abstract
Mass transit is a critical infrastructure of urban environments worldwide. The public uses it extensively, with roughly 9 billion mass transit trips occurring annually in the United States alone according to the U.S. Department of Transportation data. Its benefits per traveler include lower emissions of air pollutants and energy usage and high speeds and safety records relative to many other common modes of transportation that contribute to human health and safety. However, mass transit is vulnerable to intrusions that compromise its use and the realization of the important benefits it brings. These intrusions pertain to physical conditions, security, external evironmental conditions, and equity. The state of the physical condition of transit facilities overall has been summarized in the low ratings the American Society of Civil Engineers gives to mass transit, and the large dollar estimates to maintain existing conditions as well as to bring on new improvements, which are, however, many times lower than investments estimated for roadways. Security has become a growing issue, and numerous incidents point to the potential for threats to security in the US. External environmental conditions, such as unexpected inundations of water and electric power outages also make transit vulnerable. Equity issues pose constraints on the use of transit by those who cannot access it. Transit has shown a remarkable ability to rebound after crises, most notably after the September 11, 2001 attacks on the World Trade Center, due to a combination of design and operational features of the system. These experiences provide important lessons that must be captured to provide proactive approaches to managing and reducing the consequences of external factors that impinge negatively on transit.
Keywords: Environment, Equity, Health and safety benefits, Security, Transit, Vulnerability
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (112.9 KB).
References
- 1.Grava S. Urban Transportation Systems. Choices for Communities. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2003. pp. 810–810. [Google Scholar]
- 2.The Changing Face of Transportation. Washington, DC: U.S. DOT; 2000. [Google Scholar]
- 3.2002 National Transit Database. Washington, DC: U.S. DOT; 2003. [Google Scholar]
- 4.San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District. BART History and Facts. Available at: http://www.bart.gov/about/history/history_1.asp. Accessed November 10, 2004.
- 5.The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia. 6th ed. New York, NY: Columbia University Press; 2004. Available at: http://www.infoplease.com/ce6/sci/A0841157.html. Accessed November 10, 2004.
- 6.OECD. OECD in figures: 2004 statistics on the member countries. OECD Observer. Available at: http://trb.org/news/blurb_detail.asp?id=4390. 2004:34.
- 7.Transportation Infrastructure and New York’s Competitiveness. New York, NY: Citizens Budget Commission; 1999. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Drawn from Jane’s Information Group Limited. Jane’s Urban Transport Systems. UK: Jane’s Information Group.
- 9.National Air Quality and Emissions Trends Report. Washington, DC: U.S. EPA; 2003. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Air Quality Criteria Document for Particulate Matter. Washington, DC: U.S. EPA; 2004. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Peters A, et al. Exposure to traffic and the onset of myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:1721–1730. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa040203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Shapiro RJ, Hassett KA, Arnold FS. Conserving Energy and Preserving the Environment: The Role of Public Transportation. Washington, DC: APTA; 2002. pp. 2–2. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Monthly Energy Review. Washington, DC: U.S. DOE; 2004. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Table 4–5: Fuel Consumption by Mode of Transportation. Washington, DC: US DOT, BTS; 2003. National Transportation Statistics 2003. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Schrank D, Lomax T. The 2004 Urban Mobility Report. College Station, TX: Texas Transportation Institute; 2004. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Koslowsky M, Kluger AN, Reich M. Commuting Stress: Causes, Effects, and Methods of Coping. New York, NY: Plenum Press; 1995. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Walters CH, Cooner SA. Understanding Road Rage: Evaluation of Promising Mitigation Measures. College Station, TX: Texas A&M, Texas Transportation Institute; 2001. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Table 2–4: Distribution of Transportation Fatalities by Mode. Washington, DC: US DOT, BTS; 2003. National Transportation Statistics 2003. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Table 2–31: Transportation Safety and Property Damage Data. Washington, DC: US DOT, BTS; 2003. National Transporation Statistics 2003. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Noxon Associates Limited. Promoting better health through public transit use. Available at: http://www.cutaactu.ca/pdf/Beter Health.pdf. Accessed June 5, 2001.
- 21.Slovic P. Perception of Risk. London, UK: Earthscan; 2000. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Scorecard. 2003 Progress Report. Washington, DC: ASCE; 2003. [Google Scholar]
- 23.National Transportation Statistics 2003. Washington, DC: U.S. DOT; 2003. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Fact Sheet: Rail and Transit Security Initiatives. Washington, DC: U.S. DHS; 2004. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Protecting Surface Transportation Systems and Patrons from Terrorist Activities. Washington, DC: The Institute; 1997. [Google Scholar]
- 26.National Incident Management System (NIMS) Washington, DC: U.S. DHS; 2004. [Google Scholar]
- 27.City of New York. The Mayor’s Management Report Fiscal 2004 New York, NY: NYC Office of the Mayor; 2004.
- 28.Chowdhury MAI, Ahmed MF, Gaffar MA. Management of nonrevenue water in four cities of Bangladesh. J American Water Works Assoc. 2002;94:64–75. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Zimmerman R. Water. In: Digital Infrastructures: Enabling Civil and Environmental Systems through Information Technology. Zimmerman R, Horan T, editors. London, UK: Routledge; 2004. pp. 75–95. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Lapp K. The challenge of congestion in the New York region. Paper presented at: New York University; October 26, 2004; New York, NY (citing information in ref. 35).
- 31.Raftery T, Grace M. Pipe break floods Flatbush. Daily News. April 19, 2002;News Section:22.
- 32.Kennedy R. Union sq. bubbles over as water main bursts. The New York Times. March 3, 2000; sect B:1.
- 33.Water main break halts MARC Camden line service. The Associated Press State & Local Wire. May 9, 2001;sect: State and Regional, BC cycle.
- 34.O’Donnell M, Herguth RC. Commute a washout; flood affects 200,000 CTA users. Chicago Sun-Times. February 08, 2000; Late Sports Final Edition: 1.
- 35.Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA). Proposed Capital Program 2005–2009. New York, NY: MTA: undated, circa 2004: Slide 12. Available at: http:// www.mta.nyc.ny.us/mta/budget/pdf/capitalprogram_proposed.pdf. Accessed November 24, 2004.
- 36.Payne C. New York’s Forgotten Substations. The Power Behind the Subway. New York, NY: Princeton Architectural Press; 2002. [Google Scholar]
- 37.Zimmerman R. NYC needs systems to blunt new blackouts. Newsday. August 27, 2003:A 31.
- 38.Tucker E. Thousands lose power after explosion at Con Ed plant. The Associated Press State & Local Wire. July 20, 2002.
- 39.Horowitz D. Storms pummel travelers; Trains, planes delayed—PG&E stand by for power failures in continued foul weather. The Oakland Tribune. December 14, 2002.
- 40.Oberthur A. California braces for more wild weather. The Associated Press State & Local Wire. December 15, 2002.
- 41.Warren M. Widespread power outage hits San Francisco. The Associated Press State & Local Wire. December 8, 1998.
- 42.Sheehan C. Downtown power outage strands shoppers, snarls traffic in Chicago. The Associated Press State & Local Wire. October 8, 2000.
- 43.Diamond D. JFK Air Train tour of 7/13/02 [NYCRail.com]. 2002. Available at: http:// www.nycrail.com/misc/airtrain.htm. Accessed April 7, 2004.
- 44.Luo M. The next stop for the subway is a fully automated future. New York Times. June 23, 2004:B1.
- 45.Zimmerman R, Horan T, editors. Digital Infrastructures: Enabling Civil and Environmental Systems through Information Technology. London, UK: Routledge; 2004. [Google Scholar]
- 46.Environmental Justice. Washington, DC: U.S. EPA; 2004. [Google Scholar]
- 47.Forkenbrock D, Sheeley J. Effective Methods for Environmental Justice Assessment. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board, National Cooperative Highway Research Program; 2004. pp. 4–4. [Google Scholar]
- 48.Hodge DC. My fair share. Equity issues in urban transportation. In: Hanson S, editor. The Geography of Urban Transportation. New York, NY: The Guilford Press; 1995. pp. 372–372. [Google Scholar]
- 49.Murakami E, Young J. Proceedings from the Nationwide Personal Transportation Survey Symposium, October 29–31, 1997. Washington, DC: U.S. DOT; 1999. Daily travel by persons with low income; pp. 69–69. [Google Scholar]
- 50.Hidden in Plain Sight. Washington, DC: U.S. DOT; 2004. [Google Scholar]
- 51.Zimmerman R. Beyond September 11th: An Account of Post-Disaster Research. Boulder, CO: University of Colorado; 2003. Public infrastructure service flexibility for response and recovery in the September 11th, 2001 attacks at the World Trade Center; pp. 241–268. [Google Scholar]
- 52.Jenkins BM, Edwards-Winslow F. Saving City Lifelines: Lessons Learned in the 9–11 Terrorist Attacks. San Jose, CA: Mineta Transportation Institute; 2003. [Google Scholar]