Academies Internship Information Sign up for PNAS Online eTocs
Link: Info for AuthorsLink: SubscribeLink: AboutLink: Editorial BoardLink: ContactLink: Site Map Link: PNAS Home
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Link: Current Issue "" Link: Archives "" Link: Online Submission ""  Link: Advanced Search

Institution: NIH Library Sign In as Member / Individual


This Article
Abstract
Full Text
Services
Alert me to new issues of the journal
Request Copyright Permission

Nakao et al. 10.1073/pnas.0405709101.

Supporting Information

Files in this Data Supplement:

Supporting Figure 7
Supporting Figure 8




Fig. 7. Responses during low-frequency burst stimulation (LFBS) trains. Traces show field responses to the first, 20th, and 600th bursts in LFBS of various conditions of LFBS applied to the medial perforant path (MPP) and basolateral amygdala (BLA) .





Fig. 8. Three-dimensional representations of the interplay of MPP–dentata gyrus (DG) and BLA–DG synaptic transmission. (A) First dimension of plastic modulations. The degree of MPP–DG synaptic activation determines the direction of homosynaptic modification, depicting a Bienenstock–Cooper–Monro (BCM)-like sinusoidal curve. (B) Second dimension of plastic modulations. The BCM-like curve is subject to BLA–DG heterosynaptic activity-dependent variation, making a pseudovertical shift as BLA activity increases. (C) Third dimension of plastic modulations. The capacity of the BLA to modulate MPP plasticity is itself modulated by synaptic efficacy of BLA–DG transmission, i.e., state-dependent neuromodulation of MPP plasticity.