Skip to main content
UKPMC Funders Author Manuscripts logoLink to UKPMC Funders Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jul 16.
Published in final edited form as: Blood. 2022 Oct 6;140(14):1592–1606. doi: 10.1182/blood.2021014009

STAT1 is essential for HSC function and maintains MHCIIhi stem cells that resist myeloablation and neoplastic expansion

Juan Li 1,2,*, Matthew J Williams 1,2,*, Hyun Jung Park 1,2,*, Hugo P Bastos 1,2, Xiaonan Wang 1,2, Daniel Prins 1,2, Nicola K Wilson 1,2, Carys Johnson 1,2, Kendig Sham 1,2, Michelle Wantoch 1,2, Sam Watcham 1,2, Sarah J Kinston 1,2, Dean C Pask 1,2, Tina L Hamilton 1,2, Rachel Sneade 1,2, Amie K Waller 1,2, Cedric Ghevaert 1,2, George S Vassiliou 1,2, Elisa Laurenti 1,2, David G Kent 3, Berthold Göttgens 1,2,†,, Anthony R Green 1,2,†,
PMCID: PMC7614316  EMSID: EMS170584  PMID: 35767701

Abstract

Adult hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) are predominantly quiescent and can be activated in response to acute stress such as infection or cytotoxic insults. STAT1 is a pivotal downstream mediator of interferon (IFN) signaling and is required for IFN-induced HSC proliferation, but little is known about the role of STAT1 in regulating homeostatic hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells (HSPCs). Here, we show that loss of STAT1 altered the steady state HSPC landscape, impaired HSC function in transplantation assays, delayed blood cell regeneration following myeloablation, and disrupted molecular programs that protect HSCs, including control of quiescence. Our results also reveal STAT1-dependent functional HSC heterogeneity. A previously unrecognized subset of homeostatic HSCs with elevated major histocompatibility complex class II (MHCII) expression (MHCIIhi) displayed molecular features of reduced cycling and apoptosis and was refractory to 5-fluorouracil–induced myeloablation. Conversely, MHCIIlo HSCs displayed increased megakaryocytic potential and were preferentially expanded in CALR mutant mice with thrombocytosis. Similar to mice, high MHCII expression is a feature of human HSCs residing in a deeper quiescent state. Our results therefore position STAT1 at the interface of stem cell heterogeneity and the interplay between stem cells and the adaptive immune system, areas of broad interest in the wider stem cell field.

Introduction

Lifelong production of all mature blood and immune cells is sustained by a rare population of bone marrow hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) that differentiate to produce a hierarchy of progenitors and mature cells.1 In steady state, although daily hematopoiesis is mainly maintained by actively cycling progenitors downstream of HSCs,24 the HSCs themselves are predominantly quiescent and thus largely protected from genotoxic insults.58 However, in response to acute stress such as blood loss, infection, or cytotoxic insults, HSCs can rapidly respond by temporarily exiting quiescence and activating cell division to ensure efficient replenishment of blood and immune cells.9,10 The behavior and integrity of HSCs are tightly regulated by intrinsic and extrinsic factors including the bone marrow environment, whereas dysregulation leads to hematopoietic failure and/or hematologic malignancies.1113

Inflammation is a key regulator of HSC fate, and a growing body of studies has documented roles for inflammatory signals in modulating HSC fate and long-term functionality.11,1416 Interferons (IFNs) are a family of inflammatory cytokines long considered to be antiproliferative17,18; indeed, IFN-α has been used as a therapy for cancer, particularly for some hematologic malignancies.1921 However, activation of IFN-α signaling in HSCs was found to induce G0 exit and entry into active cell cycling,10 whereas HSCs lacking Irf2, a transcriptional suppressor of type I IFN signaling, showed enhanced cycling.22 Both studies reported that the activation of type I IFN signaling in HSCs led to impaired repopulation in transplantation assays.10,22 IFN-γ was also shown to activate HSC proliferation in vivo in response to bacterial infection.23 Interestingly, IFN-α-driven HSC proliferation was shown to be transient, and upon chronic exposure, HSCs return to quiescence, thus protecting them from exhaustion.24 In addition, IFNs trigger differentiation responses: IFN-α activates a posttranscriptional megakaryocytic program in a subset of HSC-like cells expressing high levels of the megakaryocytic marker CD41,25 whereas IFN-γ induces myeloid differentiation in a subset of HSCs expressing IFN-γ receptor.26

STAT1 is a pivotal downstream mediator of IFN signaling in the context of microbial infection or recognition of tumor cells.27,28 STAT1-deficient mice are born at normal frequencies with no gross developmental defects.29,30 However, STAT1 deficiency in human patients is associated with predisposition to mycobacterial and viral diseases,31 STAT1KO mice die of infection upon bacterial or viral challenge, and STAT1KO bone marrow macrophages and spleen cells fail to respond to IFN.29,30 STAT1KO mice produce normal numbers of B lymphocytes, monocytes, and granulocytes in fetal liver or neonatal thymus29 but have abnormal development of regulatory T cells (Treg) and natural killer cells.3234 STAT1 was shown to be required for both IFN-α- and IFN-γ–induced HSC exit from dormancy,10,23 whereas loss of STAT1 had subtle effects on baseline HSC numbers and engraftment in primary transplants.26 However, the underlying mechanisms remain unclear, and particularly little is known about the role of STAT1 in regulating hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) under steady-state conditions.

Methods

Mice

The wild-type C57BL/6 (CD45.2), C57BL/6.SJL (CD45.1), and CD45.1/CD45.2 F1 mice in this study were used at 10 to 24 weeks of age. STAT1−/− mice29 were kindly gifted from Thomas Decker and were analyzed between the ages of 10 and 52 weeks. Vwf-eGFP mice35 were kindly gifted from Claus Nerlov and Sten Eirik Jacobsen. CALRdel knock-in mice were generated in the Green laboratory.36 All mice were on a C57BL/6 background and kept in specific pathogen-free conditions, and all procedures were performed according to UK Home Office regulations.

5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) treatment

5-FU (Sigma) was prepared in phosphate-buffered saline and administered intraperitoneally to STAT1KO or wild-type (WT) mice (150 mg/kg). Peripheral blood was collected via tail vein into EDTA-coated tubes for full blood counts at 0, 4, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 14 days after 5-FU administration.

Smart-seq2 and HSPC 10X Genomics single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq)analysis

Single ESLAM (EPCR+CD45+CD150+CD48) HSCs were fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) sorted from bone marrow mononuclear cells (BMMNCs) and processed using Smart-seq2.37 Lineage-c-Kit+ (LK) cells were sorted from BMMNCs and processed according to the manufacturer's protocol for 10x Chromium (10X Genomics, Pleasanton, CA).

Statistics

The statistical differences were assessed using a 2-tailed, unpaired Student t test unless otherwise indicated.

Results

Loss of STAT1 alters the steady-state landscape of HSPCs

To investigate the role of STAT1 in the HSPC compartment, we first analyzed its expression across immature and mature HSPC populations in previously published scRNA-seq datasets. We observed the highest expression of Stat1 and prototypical pSTAT1 target genes in HSCs within the LK population,38 whereas relatively lower levels were seen in neutrophil, basophil, MK, and mid/late erythroid progenitors (Figure 1A; supplemental Figure 1A, available on the Blood Web site). Using scRNA-seq data of phenotypically defined HSPC populations,37 we confirmed that both LT-HSCs and the most immature cell populations express high levels of Stat1 (Figure 1B).

Figure 1. Loss of STAT1 affects the stem and progenitor compartment in steady-state hematopoiesis.

Figure 1

(A) Dot plot showing normalized STAT1 expression in cell types across the Dahlin landscape. The size of each dot indicates the proportion of cells with normalized expression level >0, and the color intensity shows the levels of STAT1 expression. (B) Violin plots showing normalized STAT1 expression in immature cell types in Nestorowa's scRNA-seq dataset. Mean ± standard deviation indicated in overlaid box. (C) The frequency of T cells was reduced in STAT1-deficient bone marrow. (D) The frequency of pre-granulocyte-macrophage progenitors (PreGM) was increased in STAT1-deficient bone marrow. Flow cytometry was performed, and PreGM progenitors were defined as Lin-Sca1-cKit+CD41-CD16/32-CD105-CD150-. (E) The frequencies of MPP3 and MPP4 were reduced in STAT1-deficient bone marrow. Flow cytometry was performed, and multipotent progenitor MPPs were defined as the following: MPP1 (Flk2-CD150+CD48-LSK), MPP2 (Flk2-CD150+CD48+LSK), MPP3 (Flk2-CD150-CD48+LSK), and MPP4 (Flk2+CD150-CD48+LSK). (F) The frequency of ESLAM HSCs was increased in STAT1-deficient mice. Bone marrow ESLAM HSCs were defined as CD45+CD150+CD48-EPCR+ cells. Data are shown as mean ± standard error; asterisks indicate significant differences by Student t test (*P < .05; **P < .01).

STAT1-deficient mice showed normal peripheral blood counts, spleen weight, and bone marrow cellularity (supplemental Figure 1B-D). Compared with WT controls, the bone marrow of STAT1-deficient mice contained similar frequencies of erythroblasts (CD71+Ter119+), megakaryocytes (CD41+CD42d+), myeloid (Ly6g+CD11b+) and B220+ B cells (supplemental Figure 1E-G), but the frequency of T cells (CD3e+) was reduced (Figure 1C). There was an increased frequency of myeloid progenitors (PreGM, Lin-Sca1-cKit+CD41-CD16/32-CD105- CD150-) but no change in the other progenitors analyzed (Figure 1D; supplemental Figure 1H). Within the immature cell populations, the frequencies of myeloid-primed MPP3 and lymphoid-primed MPP4 compartments were decreased (Figure 1E), whereas the frequency of ESLAM HSCs39 was increased in STAT1-deficient mice (Figure 1F). Taken together, these data indicate that loss of STAT1 affects the HSPC compartment in steady-state hematopoiesis.

Single-cell RNA profiling enables high-resolution analysis of heterogeneous stem/progenitor populations.1 We therefore performed droplet-based 10X Genomics scRNA-seq to analyze how loss of STAT1 affects the transcriptomic landscape in bone marrow HSPCs. LK cells, containing the majority of hematopoietic progenitor cell populations, were sorted and sequenced from a pair of STAT1KO and control mice. Cells were projected onto a previously published LK dataset of 44 82 cells38 (supplemental Figure 2A). Cells from both STAT1KO and WT control mice were found in all major blood lineages. However, in STAT1-deficient mice, cells within the immature 2 cluster were relatively increased, whereas those in the stem/MPP, immature 1 and 3, and other lineage-restricted progenitor clusters were all decreased (supplemental Figure 2B-C).

These results therefore demonstrate that loss of STAT1 causes widespread alterations across the HSPC compartment and suggests that although immunophenotypically defined HSC numbers were increased in STAT1-deficient bone marrow, the size of the functional HSC pool may be reduced.

HSCs from STAT1-deficient mice are functionally impaired in competitive transplantation assays

To investigate HSC function, we performed competitive transplantation assays. We first examined the repopulating capacity of bone marrow (5 × 105 BMMNCs) from STAT1KO or WT control mice (CD45.2+) when transplanted into lethally irradiated recipients with an equal number of BMMNCs from C57B/L mice (CD45.1+/CD45.2+ F1). Recipient mice receiving STAT1KO BMMNCs showed lower levels of both myeloid and lymphoid chimerism (Figure 2A). When a lower dose of bone marrow (5 × 104 BMMNCs) was transplanted, 6 out of 7 recipient mice receiving STAT1KO BMMNCs showed almost no repopulation, whereas multiple mice receiving WT cells showed donor chimerism >10% (Figure 2B). These data indicate that STAT1-deficient bone marrow contained lower numbers of functional HSCs.

Figure 2. HSCs from STAT1KO mice show functional defects in competitive transplants.

Figure 2

(A) STATI-deficient bone marrow (BM) cells exhibited reduced repopulating capacity in competitive transplant recipients. 5 × 105 BM cells (CD45.2+) from STAT1KO or WT control mice were mixed with an equal number of competitor cells (CD45.1+/45.2+) and transplanted into lethally irradiated CD45.1 recipient mice. Donor repopulation was assessed using flow cytometry of nucleated peripheral blood with antibodies for CD45.1 and CD45.2 to distinguish donor origin: Ly6g and Mac1 for myeloid and B220 and CD3e for lymphoid cells. Bar graphs show the competitive repopulating ability of donor cells presented as the percentage of repopulated cells derived from test donor cells among the total number of donor-derived cells (y = test/[test + competitor]). (B) Bone marrow cells from STAT1KO mice contained a lower number of functional HSCs as shown by chimerism at 5 months posttransplantation. Competitive bone marrow transplantation was performed and analyzed as (A) using low-dose (5 × 104) BM cells from WT or STAT1KO mice. At 5 months posttransplantation, 6 out 7 recipients receiving STAT1KO BM cells were found to have donor chimerisms <0.5% in myeloid lineage (5 with 0% and 1 with 0.2%), whereas only 2 recipients receiving STAT1+/+ BM had chimerisms <0.5% (1 with 0% and 1 with 0.1%). (C) ESLAM HSCsfrom STAT1KO mice displayed reduced repopulation capacity. 30 ESLAM HSCs FACS isolated from STAT1KO or WT control mice and mixed with 3 × 105 CD45.1+/CD45.2+ competitor bone marrow cells were transplanted into lethally irradiated CD45.1 recipients. Repopulating capacity in bone marrow was analyzed as in (A). (D) Frequency of ESLAM HSCs derived from STAT1KO donor was reduced. At 6 months posttransplantation in (C), bone marrow cells from the recipient mice were assessed for donor-derived HSC chimerism using flow cytometry. ESLAM HSC was defined as CD45+CD150+CD48-EPCR+, and donor origin was distinguished using antibodies for CD45.1 and CD45.2. (E-F) ESLAM HSCs from STAT1KO mice displayed reduced repopulation capacity in blood (E) and bone marrow (F) in secondary transplant. 5 × 106BMcells from the primary recipients in (C) were transplanted into secondary recipients (CD45.1+), and donor repopulation was assessed as in (A). (G) Frequency of ESLAM HSCs derived from STAT1KO donor was reduced in secondary transplant recipients at 5 months posttransplantation. Data are shown as mean ± standard error; asterisks indicate significant differences by Student t test (*P < .05; **P < .01; ***P < .001; ****P < .0001).

We next performed competitive transplants using 30 FACS-isolated ESLAM HSCs from WT or STAT1KO mice. Recipients of STAT1KO HSCs showed reduced multilineage repopulation (Figure 2C) and a threefold reduction in donor-derived HSC chimerism (Figure 2D). Following secondary transplantation, we observed approximately fourfold lower multilineage repopulation and donor-derived HSC chimerism (Figure 2E-G). Collectively, these data demonstrate that loss of STAT1 impairs the ability of HSCs to undergo multilineage repopulation and self-renew.

STAT1 is required to maintain protective transcriptional programs in homeostatic HSCs, including inhibition of cell cycling

To interrogate the molecular programs controlled by STAT1 in steady-state HSCs, we sorted ESLAM HSCs from STAT1KO and WT mice and performed plate-based single-cell RNA sequencing. A total of 192 single HSC transcriptomes were generated for each genotype, of which 186 STAT1KO and 191 WT passed quality control (supplemental Figure 3A). These populations occupied distinct and overlapping spaces in diffusion maps (Figure 3A). Differential gene expression analysis identified 351 significantly downregulated genes and only 66 upregulated genes in STAT1KO HSCs (P < .05; supplemental Table 1). The magnitude of fold changes was generally much higher for downregulated genes than for the upregulated genes (Figure 3B). The most affected genes included a repertoire of molecules involved in antigen processing and presentation, including genes for the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) (Figures 3B-C). Markedly downregulated genes also included those involved in virus life cycle (Ifitm3, Oas family, Mx2, and Dsad2), IFN-stimulated genes, virus sensing genes (Ifit1, Zbp1), genes involved in the transcriptional response to IFN (Irf1, Irf7, and Irf9), and genes encoding AP-1 transcription factors (Figure 3D; supplemental Figure 3B).

Figure 3. STAT1 is required to maintain protective transcriptional programs in homeostatic HSCs including inhibition of cell cycling.

Figure 3

(A) Diffusion map showing a proportion of STAT1-deficient HSCs occupy space distinct from WT HSCs. WT ESLAM, dark blue dots; STAT1KO ESLAM HSCs, light green dots. (B) Volcano plot of differentially expressed genes (red dots) using DESEq2 and Benjamini-Hochberg corrected P values at a significance level of .01. (C) Heatmap showing MHCI gene expression and hierarchical clustering of ESLAM HSCs from STAT1KO or WT mice. (D) STAT1-deficient HSCs expressed reduced levels of genes involved in virus life cycle, viral sensing, and genes in pathways that activate transcription of IFN and IFN-stimulated genes. Violin plots showing normalized expression. (E) Pathway enrichment analysis showing downregulated Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways in STAT1-deficient ESLAM HSCs. Statistical significance is indicated by −Log10(P.adj). (F) Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) plots showing significant enrichment of cell cycle related signatures in STAT1-deficient ESLAM HSCs. NES and FDR are indicated. FDR, false discovery rate; KO, knockout; NES, normalized enrichment score; P.adj., adjusted P value.

We performed Gene Ontology (GO) pathway enrichment analyses using the lists of differentially expressed genes (cutoff of adjusted P< .05) and identified 23 GO terms that were significantly depleted in STAT1KO HSCs (cutoff q < 0.01; supplemental Table 2). These terms included antigen processing/presentation, response to IFNs, defense response to virus, and allograft rejection (Figure 3E; cholesterol biosynthetic process and secondary alcohol biosynthetic response, endoplasmic reticulum stress, and cell cycle arrest were also among those significantly downregulated terms (supplemental Table 2). In contrast, no pathways were significantly enriched in STAT1KO HSCs.

Consistent with GO analysis, GSEA of STAT1KO HSCs revealed depleted transcriptional signatures in response to IFNs, allograft rejection, inflammatory response, and cholesterol homeostasis (supplemental Figure 3C; supplemental Table 3). Conversely, signatures related to cell cycling were enriched in STAT1KO HSCs, including DNA replication, ribosome, Myc targets, E2F targets, and G2M checkpoint (Figure 3F). Conversely, genes related to cell cycle arrest were moderately reduced in STAT1-deficient HSCs (supplemental Figure 3D).

Together, these data demonstrate that STAT1-deficient HSCs at steady state have reduced expression of MHC molecules, IFN-stimulated genes, genes involved as defense against viral infection, and those involved in viral sensing/tumor immuno-surveillance. Our data also show that loss of STAT1 dysregulates several pathways that modulate stem cell behavior, including cholesterol biosynthesis,40,41 endoplasmic reticulum stress,42 and cell cycle.6,7,43

STATI-deficient mice show delayed peripheral blood cell regeneration following myeloablation

The increased cell cycle signatures in STAT1-deficient HSCs raised the possibility that STAT1 inhibits cell cycle entry. This would be consistent with our observation that STAT1KO mice harbor increased numbers of immunophenotypic HSCs (Figure 1F) but fewer functional HSCs (Figure 2). To explore this possibility, we evaluated the cell cycle status of HSCs from STAT1-deficient mice under steady-state conditions. Flow cytometry using intracellular Ki-67/4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) staining showed that the fraction of STAT1-deficient ESLAM HSCs in G0 was comparable to that from WT controls (Figure 4A-B). However, increased cycling of a subset of cells within a largely quiescent population may not be detectable by this approach.

Figure 4. STAT1-deficient mice display delayed blood rebounds following 5'-FU-induced myeloablation.

Figure 4

(A) Representative flow cytometry plots showing cell cycle analysis using intracellular staining of Ki-67/DAPI. G0 phase is defined as Ki-67 and 2n DNA, G1 as Ki-67+ and 2n DNA, and S-G2-M as Ki-67+ and DNA > 2n. (B) Bar graphs showing comparable cycling status in ESLAM HSCs from STAT1KO and WT control mice. (C) STAT1-deficient mice showed delayed rebounds of platelets and white blood cells (WBC) following a single dose of 5-FU injection (150 mg/kg). (D-E) Bar graphs showing reduced spleen size in STAT1-deficient mice at days 12 and 15, respectively. Data are shown as mean ± standard error; asterisks indicate significant differences by Student t test (****P < .0001; ***P < .001; **P < .01; *P < .05).

We therefore employed 5-FU–induced myeloablation to activate dormant HSCs.6,9,10,44,45 Mice treated with a single dose of 5-FU were monitored for 14 days to establish the kinetics of WBC and platelet rebounds.46,47 Platelet and WBC rebounds began 8 days post–5-FU in WT mice, whereas rebounds in STAT1-deficient mice were significantly delayed (Figure 4C; supplemental Figure 4A). Although WT mice developed splenomegaly following 5-FU challenge as previously reported, STAT1-deficient mice had smaller-sized spleens at days 12 and 15 (Figure 4D-E) and showed increased proportions of lineage progenitors in bone marrow (supplemental Figure 4B). Despite the expansion of HSCs in steady-state STAT1-deficient mice, following 5-FU, STAT1-deficient and WT mice showed comparable numbers of HSCs to WT at days 12 and 15 (supplemental Figure 4C). Together, these observations are consistent with the notion that STAT1-deficient mice have increased numbers of cycling HSCs and fewer quiescent functional HSCs.

STAT1 is essential for maintenance of MHCIIhi HSCs

Although constitutive MHC class II (MHCII) expression is conventionally viewed as being restricted to professional antigen-presenting cells, our scRNA-seq analysis revealed that all the classical MHCII genes were expressed in a subset of homeostatic WT ESLAM HSCs, which was lost in STAT1-deficient HSCs (Figure 5A; supplemental Figure 5A). To investigate levels of MHCII expression within the HSPC compartment in more detail, we analyzed previously published scRNA-seq datasets.37,38 Within the LK population,38 there were higher levels of MHCII gene expression (except H2-Ab1) in HSC/MPPs and lymphoid progenitors compared with other progenitors (supplemental Figure 5B). Within the more immature cell populations,37 MHCII expression was highest in LT-HSCs (supplemental Figure 5C). Flow cytometric analysis demonstrated that cell surface MHCII proteins were readily detected on a subset of WT ESLAM HSCs (~20%) and that this subset (MHCIIhi) was completely lost in STAT1-deficient mice (Figure 5B-C). It is worth noting that nearly all of the expanded ESLAM HSCs seen in STAT1-deficient mice belonged to the MHCIIlo subset (Figure 5C).

Figure 5. STAT1 maintains MHCII expression in a subset of HSCs (MHCIIhi) that are refractory to myeloablation.

Figure 5

(A) Heatmap showing MHCII gene expression and hierarchical clustering of ESLAM HSCsfrom STAT1KO and WT mice. (B) Representative flow cytometry plots showing MHCII expression on cell surface of HSCs, which was lost in STAT1-deficient ESLAM HSCs. (C) Bar graph showing the subsetof HSCswith high surface expression (MHCIIhi) was completely lost in STAT1-deficient mice. (D) GSEA plots showing a depletion of cell cycle signatures in CD74hi LT-HSCs. (E) LT-HSCs with low MHCII scores tended to display higher cycling scores. LT-HSCs from Nestorowa scRNA-seq dataset were analyzed. (F) Bar graph showing the subset of HSCs with low surface expression (MHCIIlo) are preferentially depleted following a single dose of 5-FU treatment (150 mg/Kg). Flow cytometric analysis was performed on BMMNCs at 43 hours post-injection. (G) Representative flow cytometry plots showing cycling status for MHCIIhi andMHCIIlo HSCs following 5-FU treatment. (H) Bar graphs showing MHCIIhi HSCs display reduced cycling in response to 5-FU. (I) Representative flow cytometry plots showing apoptosis status for MHCIIhi and MHCIIlo HSCs following 5-FU treatment. (J) Bar graphs showing MHCIIhi HSCs displayed reduced apoptosis in response to 5-FU. (K) Bar graphs showing MHCIIhi HSCs display reduced cycling in response to polyinosinic–polycytidylic acid at 16 hours post-treatment. (L) Bar graphs showing donor chimerisms in peripheral blood at 16 weeks post-transplantation as analyzed in Figure 2. (M) Bar graphs showing reduced donor-derived ESLAM HSC chimerisms in recipient bone marrow at 16weeks post-transplantation. Data are shown as mean ± standard error; asterisks indicate significant differences by Student t test (****P < .0001; ***P <.001;**P <.01;*P < .05). FDR, false discovery rate; iA-iE, MHCII antibody; NES, normalized enrichment score; ns, not significant.

STAT1 loss not only depletes the MHCIIhi HSC subset but also causes transcriptional changes within the remaining MHCIIlo cells. If MHCIIhi HSCs are excluded, comparison of the remaining STAT1KO and WT HSCs showed that the pathways downregulated by loss of STAT1 remained largely unchanged (supplemental Figure 5D), whereas the MHCII genes themselves were no longer detected as differentially regulated (supplemental Table 4).

CIITA is a key regulator of MHCII genes and is a transcriptional target of STAT1. However, STAT1 loss did not result in downregulation of the already low levels of Ciita in HSCs (supplemental Figure 5E-F). Moreover, in plasmodium infected mice,48 IFN-γ caused upregulation of CD74, MHCII genes, and Stat1, but Ciita was not upregulated (supplemental Figure 5G). These data indicate that MHCII gene expression may be regulated by STAT1 independently of altered Ciita expression. Consistent with this concept, lipopolysaccharide upregulates MHCII expression in dendritic cells, without affecting CIITA levels, through an AP-1 enhancer located upstream of the I-Aβ promoter.49 Interestingly, the genes encoding several AP-1 transcription factors were downregulated in STAT1KO HSCs (supplemental Figure 3B).

MHCIIhi HSCs represent a quiescent subset that is less responsive to stress-induced proliferation

To understand if MHCII-expressing HSCs exhibit distinct molecular and cellular properties, and given that CD74 is essential in the assembly and trafficking of MHCII for antigen presentation,50 we compared CD74hi and CD74lo fractions within WT LT-HSCs from a published scRNA-seq dataset37 (supplemental Figure 6A). GSEA analysis revealed that CD74hi HSCs were enriched for IFN response signatures (supplemental Figure 6B) and depleted for cell cycle signatures (Figure 5D). Consistent with this, HSCs with low MHCII scores tend to display higher cycling scores (Figure 5E), a finding confirmed by analysis of an independent HSC scRNA-seq dataset51 (supplemental Figure 6C). However, Ki-67/DAPI staining did not reveal significant differences in cell cycle status between MHCIIhi and MHCIIlo HSCs from WT mice at steady state (supplemental Figure 6D).

We therefore considered the possibility that a subset of HSCs with high levels of MHCII expression and downregulated cell cycle signatures may be protected from stress-induced proliferation. Mice were challenged with 1 dose of 5-FU and analyzed for the activities of MHCIIhi and MHCIIlo HSCs. Following 5-FU, although MHCIIlo HSCs were preferentially depleted, MHCIIhi HSCs were maintained (Figure 5F; supplemental Figure 6E), and Ki-67/DAPI staining (supplemental Figure 6F) showed that, whereas almost all MHCIIlo ESLAM HSCs were driven out of G0, nearly 60% of MHCIIhi ESLAM HSCs remained in G0 (Figures 5G-H). Moreover, CD74hi LT-HSCs showed downregulated apoptosis pathways in GO analysis (supplemental Figure 6G; supplemental Table 5), and MHCIIhi ESLAM HSCs displayed significantly lower rates of apoptosis compared with MHCIIlo HSCs both at steady state (supplemental Figure 6H) and following 5-FU treatment (Figure 5I-J). Consistent with these data, polyinosinic–polycytidylic acid treatment resulted in significantly more MHCIIhi HSCs remaining quiescent (Figure 5K), and singlecell assays showed that MHCIIhi HSCs exhibited delays in cell cycle entry in in vitro culture (supplemental Figure 6I).

To understand if MHCIIhi HSCs display distinct functional output in vivo, we performed competitive transplants using equal numbers of FACS-isolated MHCIIhi and MHCIIlo ESLAM HSCs from steady-state WT mice. Both MHCIIhi and MHCIIlo subsets contained functional stem cells, capable of multilineage blood repopulation, but MHCIIhi HSCs gave rise to lower levels of myeloid repopulation (Figure 5L; supplemental Figure 6J). At 16 weeks posttransplantation, recipient bone marrow analysis showed that donor-derived HSC chimerism was lower in MHCIIhi HSCs recipients, although this was not significant in both cohorts (Figure 5M; supplemental Figure 6K).

Taken together, these results demonstrate that both MHCIIhi and MHCIIlo subsets contain functional stem cells and that MHCIIhi HSCs represent a more quiescent subset, less responsive to stress-induced proliferation and apoptosis and which displays reduced myeloid repopulation and self-renewal in primary recipients.

MHCIIlo HSCs exhibit enhanced megakaryocytic differentiation and are preferentially expanded in mutant CALR mice with thrombocytosis

A heatmap displaying expression of MHCII genes together with CD150 and Vwf (both associated with specific lineage biases35,52) showed that HSCs expressing MHCII genes clustered separately from Vwf expressing HSCs (Figure 6A). Moreover, plotting the abundance of MHCII genes on a force-directed graph generated from the Nestorowa scRNA-seq dataset37 revealed distinct trajectories for MHCII and Vwf expression (Figure 6B). Analysis of HSCs from Vwf-GFP mice35 showed that the most Vwf-GFP+ ESLAM HSCs were MHCIIlo (Figures 6C-D). These data suggested that MHCIIhi HSCs may display reduced megakaryocytic differentiation.

Figure 6. MHCIIlo HSCs exhibit enhanced megakaryocytic differentiation and are preferentially expanded in mutant CALR mice with thrombocythemia/myelofibrosis.

Figure 6

(A) Heatmap showing Vwf-expressing HSCs cluster separately from HSCs with high levels of MHCII gene expression. LT-HSCs from Nestorowa scRNA-seq dataset were analyzed; a large proportion of LT-HSCs expressing high levels of Vwf is shown to cluster separately from HSCs with high-level expression of MHCII genes. (B) Expression of Cd74, Vwf genes plotted on the force-directed graph generated from HSPC cells in Nestorowa's scRNA-seq dataset. (C) Representative flow cytometry plots showing Vwf+ HSCs were within the MHCIIlo fraction. (D) Bar graphs showing the negative correlation between Vwf and MHCII cell surface expression within ESLAM HSCs. (E) Experimental scheme showing single-cell in vitro assays of ESLAM HSC differentiation. Single ESLAM HSCs gated with MHCIIhi or MHCIIlo were FACS sorted into 96-well plates and cultured in StemSpan medium with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 250 ng/mL stem cell factor (SCF), 10 ng/mL IL-3, and 10 ng/mL IL-6, and at day 7, each individual cell-derived clone was scored and categorized using criteria as described in Prins et al.54 (F) Bar graphs showing a reduced number of clones derived from MHCIIhi ESLAM HSCs with presence of large cells at day 7. MHCIIhi, n = 187 wells; MHCIIlo, n = 193; Chi-squared test; P = .0035. (G) Representative flow cytometry plots showing increased frequency of MHCIIlo ESLAM HSCs in knock-in mice expressing homozygous mutant CALR (CALRdel/del). (H) Bar graphs showing preferential expansion of MHCIIlo ESLAM HSCs in mutant CALR mice. Data are shown as mean ± standard error; asterisks indicate significant differences by Student t test (*P < .05; ****P < .0001). iA/iE, MHCII antibody; Large, colonies of any cell number (usually 1-30 cells), containing only very large flattened cells; Mixed, colonies of any cell number, containing small round cells and very large flattened cells; ns, not significant; Small, colonies of any cell number, containing cells that are uniformly round and small; STHSC, short term HSCs.

Consistent with this idea, CD74hi LT-HSCs showed downregulated megakaryocytic differentiation by GO analysis (supplemental Figure 7A), and flow cytometry analysis of HSCs revealed a negative correlation between expression of MHCII and expression of c-Kit, CD41, or CD150, which are markers expressed at higher levels in Mk-biased HSCs.25,53 (supplemental Figure 7B). Furthermore, clones derived from single MHCIIhi HSCs (cultured in conditions permissive for megakaryocyte differentiation as previously described54 [Figure 6E]) showed less megakaryocytic differentiation than those derived from MHCIIlo° HSCs (Figure 6F).

Somatic mutations in CALR are found in ~40% of patients with essential thrombocythemia and primary myelofibrosis. Knock-in mice expressing mutant CALR (CALRdel/del) develop marked thrombocytosis, increased megakaryopoiesis, and an expansion of immunophenotypically defined HSCs.36 We considered the possibility that an altered balance of MHCIIhi and MHCIIlo HSCs might contribute to the increased megakaryopoiesis seen in CALRdel/del mice. Analysis of our scRNA-seq dataset54 showed lower levels of MHCII expression in LT-HSCs from CALRdel/del mice (supplemental Figure 7C) together with an increased proportion of MHCIIlo LT-HSCs (supplemental Figure 7D). Flow cytometry demonstrated that MHCIIlo HSCs were indeed preferentially expanded in CALRdel/del mice compared with WT controls, whereas the number of MHCIIhi HSCs remained unchanged (Figure 6G-H; supplemental Figure 7E).

To assess the in vivo functional output of mutant MHCIIhi and MHCIIlo HSCs, 50 FACS-sorted MHCIIhi or MHCIIlo ESLAM HSCs from CALRdel/del mice were mixed with 2 × 105 BMMNCs and transplanted. Sixteen weeks posttransplantation, elevated platelet counts were seen in 3 out of 5 recipients of MHCIIhi HSCs and in 3 out of 5 recipients of MHCIIlo HSCs. Interestingly, recipients of MHCIIlo HSCs displayed a trend of higher platelet counts despite relatively lower total CD45.2+ chimerism (supplemental Figure 7F-H), suggesting both MHCII subpopulations are capable of driving the disease. Transplantation of either MHCIIhi or MHCIIlo donor HSCs from CALRdel/del mice gave rise to both subpopulations in recipient bone marrow (supplemental Figure 7I), indicating that both subsets were capable of inter-converting, although MHCIIhi donor HSCs were more likely to do so.

Together, these data demonstrate that the MHCIIhi HSC subset has a reduced potential to undergo megakaryocytic differentiation and that mutant CALR drives the preferential expansion of MHCIIlo HSCs that display increased megakaryocytic potential.

MHCII high expression marks subset of HSCs with distinct functionality in human

To explore if differing levels of MHCII expression identify functionally distinct HSCs in humans, we reanalyzed a scRNA-seq dataset of human HSCs,55 where single HSCs were sorted on the most stringent CD49f+ CD90+ phenotype.56 Cells were classified by CD74 messenger RNA expression, where the top and bottom 30% were referred to respectively as CD74hi and CD74lo LT-HSCs. Gene sets related to MHCII presentation were significantly enriched in CD74hi LT-HSCs compared with CD74lo LT-HSCs (Figure 7A). Consistent with our mouse data, gene sets related to cell cycle were significantly depleted in CD74hi LT-HSCs (Figure 7B).

Figure 7. MHCII high expression marks a subset of HSCs in a deeper quiescent state in human.

Figure 7

(A) Enrichment plot of Reactome: MHC Class II Antigen Presentation from GSEA analysis of human CB LT-HSCs comparing the top 30% of CD74 expression (CD74hi) and bottom 30% of CD74 expression (CD74lo). (B) Selected biological pathways (c2 curated pathways; FDR < 0.05) from preranked GSEA of human CB LT-HSCs with top 30% CD74 expression (CD74hi) compared with bottom 30% CD74 expression (CD74lo) (50 cells) from Belluschi et al.55 (C) Normalized expression of key MHCII regulators; FDR for differential expression between 49f+ Subset1 and 49f+ Subset2 as determined by DESeq2 shown. (D) Selected biological pathways (c2 curated pathways; FDR < 0.05) enriched in preranked GSEA analysis of 49f+Subset1 (CD34lo/C9Ahi) and 49f+Subset2 (CD34hi/C9Alo) from Belluschi et al.55 FDR, false discovery rate; NES, normalized enrichment score.

We also found that gene sets related to MHCII regulation and expression of key regulators of MHCII antigen processing and presentation were significantly higher in LT-HSCs with high cell surface CLEC9A expression and low CD34 expression CLE-C9AhiCD34lo, noted as subset 1 (Figure 7C-D). Subset 1 LT-HSCs were functionally demonstrated by Belluschi et al55 to contain long-term repopulating multipotent HSCs with slow quiescence exit kinetics compared with subset 2 LT-HSCs (CLEC9AloCD34hi), a subset restricted to myelo-lymphoid differentiation with infrequent but durable repopulation capacity.

Taken together, these results show that differing levels of CD74 and MHCII expression are associated with functionally distinct human HSCs. Consistent with our mouse data, MHCII high-expressing human HSCs displayed deeper quiescence.

Discussion

STAT1 is well recognized to be essential for IFN-mediated activation of HSCs. Here, we show that STAT1 also regulates homeostatic HSPCs and is critical for HSC self-renewal and maintenance of transcriptional programs that protect HSC integrity. In addition, we report previously unrecognized HSC subsets with differing MHCII expression: STAT1-dependent MHCIIhi HSCs, which are less responsive to stress-induced proliferation, and MHCIIlo HSCs, which exhibit enhanced megakaryocytic differentiation potential and are preferentially expanded in a mutant CALR knock-in mouse model. Similar to mice, high MHCII expression is a feature of human HSCs residing in a deeper quiescent state.

STAT1-deficient mice harbored increased numbers of immunophenotypic HSCs, which showed impaired lymphoid and myeloid repopulation and self-renewal in serial competitive transplants. Increased proliferation of HSCs has previously been reported to accompany functional exhaustion.6,7,43,57 Our results indicate that homeostatic STAT1-deficient HSCs are transcriptionally primed for cell division, observed through the enrichment of cell cycle signatures. Furthermore, STAT1-deficient mice displayed delayed WBC and platelet rebounds following 5-FU, although concomitant effects on progenitors may also contribute to this delayed rebound. These results are consistent with a recent study, which reported that HSCs in STAT1KO mice were expanded but displayed reduced function after transplantation or 5-FU.58 Our scRNA-seq analysis showed that STAT1 loss altered several pathways that modulate HSC function, including cholesterol biosynthesis,40,41 endoplasmic reticulum stress,42 and cell cycle.6,7,43 STAT1 is known to be a key component of signaling pathways triggered by multiple cytokines including IFNs, and it is possible that interruption of autocrine positive feedback loops59 may contribute to the intrinsic functional defects of STAT1-deficient HSCs. We also considered the possibility that alterations in the cellular environment might contribute to the altered HSC function. However, in our primary and secondary recipients of STAT1KO HSCs, 80% to 90% of the bone marrow hematopoietic cells were WT, and in secondary recipients, there were no differences in the proportion of myeloid (Ly6G+ and CD11b+) and lymphoid (B220+ and CD3e+) cells (data not shown), suggesting that changes in the cellular environment are highly unlikely to account for the observed HSC functional defects.

Previous seminal studies have revealed that HSCs display functional heterogeneity with regards to self-renewal and lineage bias,35,6064 although the underlying mechanisms remain largely unknown. Our results demonstrate the existence of functional HSC heterogeneity associated with MHCII expression and show that MHCIIhi HSCs were absent in STAT1 knockout mice. Our data do not exclude the possibility that MHCIIhi HSCs are lost due to enhanced differentiation from MHCIIhi into MHCIIlo HSCs. MHCIIhi HSCs displayed molecular features of reduced cycling and apoptosis and were resistant to 5-FU–induced proliferation. When the functional output of MHCIIhi HSCs were tested in transplants, MHCIIhi HSCs tended to display lower levels of myeloid repopulation and HSC chimerism, suggesting these cells were less active in repopulating and self-renewing. However, our data do not exclude the possibility that MHCIIhi HSCs display a better self-renewal potential over time upon further sequential transplantation.

A recent elegant study combining lineage tracing with single-cell transcriptomics65 demonstrated that, following 5-FU challenge, a fraction of HSCs did not produce progeny, termed ″childless″ HSCs. Examination of their transcriptomic data shows that MHCII genes are highly enriched in childless HSCs (see Figure 6 of Bowling et al65), which supports our findings that MHCIIhi HSCs were less responsive to 5-FU–induced proliferation. Another study from the same group reported that a subset of donor-derived HSCs that displayed low lineage output after transplantation were high in CD74; however, these same HSCs displayed a bias toward the Mk lineage.66 These findings contrast with our observation that MHCIIhi HSCs have reduced megakaryocytic bias and suggest that MHCIIhi HSCs may behave differently in the transplant setting. The specific absence of the MHCIIhi population in the STAT1 genetic knockout model afforded us the unique opportunity to interrogate its molecular and functional characteristics, an exploration that has hitherto proved difficult when studying the biological relevance of HSC heterogeneity.

scRNA-seq analysis of homeostatic HSCs revealed a negative correlation between the expression of MHCII genes and Vwf, which is known to be associated with megakaryocytic lineage bias.35 MHCIIhi HSCs also displayed reduced megakaryocytic differentiation compared with MHCIIlo HSCs, consistent with the clear separation of MHCIIhi HSCs from Vwf-expressing HSCs in flow cytometric analysis. These results led us to investigate whether MHCIIlo HSCs might contribute to the expansion of the megakaryocytic lineage found in the mutant CALR mouse model.36 These mice displayed a substantial expansion of MHCIIlo HSCs. Transplantation of purified MHCIIhi or MHCIIlo ESLAM HSCs from mutant CALR mice were both able to reconstitute the disease (elevated platelet counts) and gave rise to both subsets in recipient mice. Together, our results suggest a model in which mutant CALR drives a marked expansion of MHCIIlo HSCs but not MHCIIhi HSC and that there is also interconversion between MHCIIhi and MHCIIlo HSCs.

The function of MHCII on HSCs is unclear, but several lines of evidence raise the possibility that it may relate to a role for T cells in modulating HSC biology. Recent studies reported MHCII expression in Lgr5+ intestinal stem cells. Intestinal stem cell numbers were increased in MHCII-deficient or Treg-deficient mice.67 In addition, it was reported that Tregs in skin preferentially localize to hair follicle stem cells and promote hair follicle regeneration by augmenting hair follicle stem cell proliferation and differentiation.68 Of note, CD150high bone marrow Tregs have been reported to support HSC quiescence as Treg depletion increased HSC numbers.69 Because impaired Treg development was reported in STAT1KO mice,32 it is tempting to speculate that loss of MHCII expression on HSCs and Treg dysfunction may both contribute to the HSC expansion and functional impairment that we have observed in STAT1-deficient mice. CIITA is the archetypal regulator of MHCII gene expression,64 and STAT1 mediates IFN-γ–induced MHCII expression by activating CIITA.70 Interestingly, we did not observe a significant downregulation of Ciita gene expression in STAT1-deficient HSCs from steady-state mice or upregulation of Ciita in LT-HSCs from mice infected with plasmodium. These findings suggest that STAT1 may regulate MHCII expression via mechanisms independent of Ciita induction. A complex picture therefore emerges whereby the direct activation of MHCII gene expression in HSCs by STAT1 may be accompanied by interactions with immune cells, which together contribute to the formation and/or maintenance of an HSC subpopulation with distinct molecular and functional characteristics.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental methods and figures
Supplemental table 1
Supplemental table 2
Supplemental table 3
Supplemental table 4
Supplemental table 5

Key Points.

  • STAT1 is essential for normal HSC function and maintenance of a MHCIIhi HSC subset that is less responsive to stress-induced proliferation.

  • MHCIIhi and MHCIIlo subsets both contain functional HSCs, but MHCIIlo HSCs show increased Mk potential and are expanded in mutant CALR mice.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank J. Aungier and all the technicians in the Green and Göttgens labs for their valuable technical assistance; R. Schulte, C. Cossetti, and G. Grondys-Kotarba at the Cambridge Institute for Medical Research Flow Cytometry Core Facility for assistance with cell sorting; S. Mendez-Ferrer, S. Loughran, J. Deuel, and T. Klampfl for valuable constructive discussions; Justyna Rak for facilitating approval of mouse experimental work; and B. Arnold, M. Feetenby, N. Lumley, H. Bloy, L. Smith, and the all members of the Anne McLaren Building Animal Core Facility for excellent technical assistance, animal welfare, and husbandry.

Work in the Laurenti laboratory is supported by a Sir Henry Dale fellowship from Wellcome/Royal Society (107630/Z/15/Z and 107630/Z/15/A) to E.L. and core support grants by Wellcome and Medical Research Council (MRC) to the Wellcome−MRC Cambridge Stem Cell Institute (203151/Z/16/Z). For the purpose of Open Access, the author has applied a CC BY public copyright license to any author-accepted manuscript version arising from this submission. C.J. was funded by MRC (1942750). Work in the Göttgens laboratory is supported by the MRC (MR/M008975/1), Wellcome (206328/Z/17/Z), Blood Cancer UK (18002), and Cancer Research UK (RG83389, jointly with A.R.G.). Work in the Green laboratory is supported by Wellcome (RG74909), William B Harrison Foundation (RG91681), and Cancer Research UK (RG83389, jointly with B.G.).

Footnotes

Conflict-of-interest disclosure: The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Authorship

Contribution: J.L. and M.J.W. designed the study, conducted experiments, and analyzed data with input from H.J.P.; H.P.B., X.W., C.J., K.S., and S.W. performed bioinformatic analyses; D.P. helped with Mk in vitro differentiation assays; M.W. helped phosphor flow; N.K.W. and S.J.K. helped with scRNA-seq; G.S.V., A.K.W., and C.G. helped with 5-FU studies; D.G.K. helped with transplant experiments; E.L. helped human data analysis; T.L.H., D.C.P., and R.S. provided technical assistance; J.L., B.G., and A.R.G wrote the manuscript with input from M.J.W and H.J.P.; and B.G. and A.R.G. supervised the study.

Footnotes

Submitted 7 September 2021; accepted 21 April 2022; prepublished online on Blood First Edition 29 June 2022.

The data were deposited in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and are accessible through accession numbers GSE180904 and GSE180905, respectively.

The online version of this article contains a data supplement.

There is a Blood Commentary on this article in this issue.

The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. Therefore, and solely to indicate this fact, this article is hereby marked ″advertisement″ in accordance with 18 USC section 1734.

References

  • 1.Laurenti E, Göttgens B. From haematopoietic stem cells to complex differentiation landscapes. Nature. 2018;553(7689):418–426. doi: 10.1038/nature25022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Sun J, Ramos A, Chapman B, et al. Clonal dynamics of native haematopoiesis. Nature. 2014;514(7522):322–327. doi: 10.1038/nature13824. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Busch K, Klapproth K, Barile M, et al. Fundamental properties of unperturbed haematopoiesis from stem cells in vivo. Nature. 2015;518(7540):542–546. doi: 10.1038/nature14242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Pei W, Feyerabend TB, Rössler J, et al. Polylox barcoding reveals haematopoie stem cell fates realized in vivo. Nature. 2017;548(7668):456–460. doi: 10.1038/nature23653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Cheshier SH, Morrison SJ, Liao X, Weissman IL. In vivo proliferation and cell cycle kinetics of long-term self-renewing hematopoietic stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96(6):3120–3125. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.6.3120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Cheng T, Rodrigues N, Shen H, et al. Hematopoietic stem cell quiescence maintained by p21cip1/waf1. Science. 2000;287(5459):1804–1808. doi: 10.1126/science.287.5459.1804. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Arai F, Hirao A, Ohmura M, et al. Tie2/angiopoietin-1 signaling regulates hematopoietic stem cell quiescence in the bone marrow niche. Cell. 2004;118(2):149–161. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2004.07.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Passegué E, Wagers AJ, Giuriato S, Anderson WC, Weissman IL. Global analysis of proliferation and cell cycle gene expression in the regulation of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell fates. J Exp Med. 2005;202(11):1599–1611. doi: 10.1084/jem.20050967. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wilson A, Laurenti E, Oser G, et al. Hematopoietic stem cells reversibly switch from dormancy to self-renewal during homeostasis and repair. Cell. 2008;135(6):1118–1129. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.10.048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Essers MA, Offner S, Blanco-Bose WE, et al. IFNalpha activates dormant haematopoietic stem cells in vivo. Nature. 2009;458(7240):904–908. doi: 10.1038/nature07815. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Pietras EM. Inflammation: a key regulator of hematopoietic stem cell fate in health and disease. Blood. 2017;130(15):1693–1698. doi: 10.1182/blood-2017-06-780882. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Haas S, Trumpp A, Milsom MD. Causes and consequences of hematopoietic stem cell heterogeneity. Cell Stem Cell. 2018;22(5):627–638. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2018.04.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Pinho S, Frenette PS. Haematopoietic stem cell activity and interactions with the niche. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2019;20(5):303–320. doi: 10.1038/s41580-019-0103-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.King KY, Goodell MA. Inflammatory modulation of HSCs: viewing the HSC as a foundation for the immune response. Nat Rev Immunol. 2011;11(10):685–692. doi: 10.1038/nri3062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.de Bruin AM, Voermans C, Nolte MA. Impact of interferon-γ on hematopoiesis. Blood. 2014;124(16):2479–2486. doi: 10.1182/blood-2014-04-568451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Hormaechea-Agulla D, Le DT, King KY. Common sources of inflammation and their impact on hematopoietic stem cell biology. Curr Stem Cell Rep. 2020;6(3):96–107. doi: 10.1007/s40778-020-00177-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Verma A, Deb DK, Sassano A, et al. Activation of the p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase mediates the suppressive effects of type I interferons and transforming growth factorbeta on normal hematopoiesis. J Biol Chem. 2002;277(10):7726–7735. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M106640200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Platanias LC. Mechanisms of type-I- and type-II-interferon-mediated signalling. Nat Rev Immunol. 2005;5(5):375–386. doi: 10.1038/nri1604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Preudhomme C, Guilhot J, Nicolini FE, et al. France Intergroupe des Leucemies MyeloTdes Chroniques (Fi-LMC). Imatinib plus peginterferon alfa-2a in chronic myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(26):2511–2521. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1004095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Lu M, Wang J, Li Y, et al. Treatment with the Bcl-xL inhibitor ABT-737 in combination with interferon α specifically targets JAK2V617F-positive polycythemia vera hematopoietic progenitor cells. Blood. 2010;116(20):4284–4287. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-04-279125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Simonsson B, Gedde-Dahl T, Markevärn B, et al. Nordic CML Study Group. Combination of pegylated IFN-α2b with imatinib increases molecular response rates in patients with low-or intermediate-risk chronic myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2011;118(12):3228–3235. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-02-336685. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Sato T, Onai N, Yoshihara H, Arai F, Suda T, Ohteki T. Interferon regulatory factor-2 protects quiescent hematopoietic stem cells from type I interferon-dependent exhaustion. Nat Med. 2009;15(6):696–700. doi: 10.1038/nm.1973. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Baldridge MT, King KY, Boles NC, Weksberg DC, Goodell MA. Quiescent haematopoietic stem cells are activated by IFN-gamma in response to chronic infection. Nature. 2010;465(7299):793–797. doi: 10.1038/nature09135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Pietras EM, Lakshminarasimhan R, Techner JM, et al. Re-entry into quiescence protects hematopoietic stem cells from the killing effect of chronic exposure to type I interferons. J Exp Med. 2014;211(2):245–262. doi: 10.1084/jem.20131043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Haas S, Hansson J, Klimmeck D, et al. Inflammation-induced emergency megakaryopoiesis driven by hematopoietic stem cell-like megakaryocyte progenitors. Cell Stem Cell. 2015;17(4):422–434. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2015.07.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Matatall KA, Shen CC, Challen GA, King KY. Type II interferon promotes differentiation of myeloid-biased hematopoietic stem cells. Stem Cells. 2014;32(11):3023–3030. doi: 10.1002/stem.1799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Darnell JE, Jr, Kerr IM, Stark GR. Jak-STAT pathways and transcriptional activation in response to IFNs and other extracellular signaling proteins. Science. 1994;264(5164):1415–1421. doi: 10.1126/science.8197455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Meissl K, Macho-Maschler S, Müller M, Strobl B. The good and the bad faces of STAT1 in solid tumours. Cytokine. 2017;89:12–20. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2015.11.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Durbin JE, Hackenmiller R, Simon MC, Levy DE. Targeted disruption of the mouse Stat1 gene results in compromised innate immunity to viral disease. Cell. 1996;84(3):443–450. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81289-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Meraz MA, White JM, Sheehan KC, et al. Targeted disruption of the Stat1 gene in mice reveals unexpected physiologic specificity in the JAK-STAT signaling pathway. Cell. 1996;84(3):431–442. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81288-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Dupuis S, Jouanguy E, Al-Hajjar S, et al. Impaired response to interferon-alpha/beta and lethal viral disease in human STAT1 deficiency. Nat Genet. 2003;33(3):388–391. doi: 10.1038/ng1097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Nishibori T, Tanabe Y, Su L, David M. Impaired development of CD4+ CD25+ regulatory T cells in the absence of STAT1: increased susceptibility to autoimmune disease. J Exp Med. 2004;199(1):25–34. doi: 10.1084/jem.20020509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Robbins SH, Tessmer MS, Van Kaer L, Brossay L. Direct effects of T-bet and MHC class I expression, but not STAT1, on peripheral NKcell maturation. Eur J Immunol. 2005;35(3):757–765. doi: 10.1002/eji.200425797. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Putz EM, Majoros A, Gotthardt D, et al. Novel non-canonical role of STAT1 in natural killer cell cytotoxicity. OncoImmunology. 2016;5(9):e1186314. doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2016.1186314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Sanjuan-Pla A, Macaulay IC, Jensen CT, et al. Platelet-biased stem cells reside at the apex of the haematopoietic stem-cell hierarchy. Nature. 2013;502(7470):232–236. doi: 10.1038/nature12495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Li J, Prins D, Park HJ, et al. Mutant calreticulin knockin mice develop thrombocytosis and myelofibrosis without a stem cell self-renewal advantage. Blood. 2018;131(6):649–661. doi: 10.1182/blood-2017-09-806356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Nestorowa S, Hamey FK, Pijuan Sala B, et al. A single-cell resolution map of mouse hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell differentiation. Blood. 2016;128(8):e20–e31. doi: 10.1182/blood-2016-05-716480. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Dahlin JS, Hamey FK, Pijuan-Sala B, et al. A single-cell hematopoietic landscape resolves 8 lineage trajectories and defects in Kit mutant mice. Blood. 2018;131(21):e1–e11. doi: 10.1182/blood-2017-12-821413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Kent DG, Copley MR, Benz C, et al. Prospective isolation and molecular characterization of hematopoietic stem cells with durable self-renewal potential. Blood. 2009;113(25):6342–6350. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-12-192054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Oguro H. The roles of cholesterol and its metabolites in normal and malignant hematopoiesis. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2019;10:204. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2019.00204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Xie SZ, Garcia-Prat L, Voisin V, et al. Sphingolipid modulation activates proteostasis programs to govern human hematopoietic stem cell self-renewal. Cell Stem Cell. 2019;25(5):639–653.:e7. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2019.09.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.van Galen P, Kreso A, Mbong N, et al. The unfolded protein response governs integrity of the haematopoietic stem-cell pool during stress. Nature. 2014;510(7504):268–272. doi: 10.1038/nature13228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Hock H, Hamblen MJ, Rooke HM, et al. Gfi-1 restricts proliferation and preserves functional integrity of haematopoietic stem cells. Nature. 2004;431(7011):1002–1007. doi: 10.1038/nature02994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Randall TD, Weissman IL. Phenotypic and functional changes induced at the clonal level in hematopoietic stem cells after 5-fluorouracil treatment. Blood. 1997;89(10):3596–3606. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Venezia TA, Merchant AA, Ramos CA, et al. Molecular signatures of proliferation and quiescence in hematopoietic stem cells. PLoS Biol. 2004;2(10):e301. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Radley JM, Scurfield G. Effects of 5-fluorouracil on mouse bone marrow. Br J Haematol. 1979;43(3):341–351. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.1979.tb03761.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Radley JM, Hodgson GS, Levin J. Platelet production after administration of antiplatelet serum and 5-fluorouracil. Blood. 1980;55(1):164–166. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Haltalli MLR, Watcham S, Wilson NK, et al. Manipulating niche composition limits damage to haematopoietic stem cells during Plasmodium infection. Nat Cell Biol. 2020;22(12):1399–1410. doi: 10.1038/s41556-020-00601-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Casals C, Barrachina M, Serra M, Lloberas J, Celada A. Lipopolysaccharide up-regulates MHC class II expression on dendritic cells through an AP-1 enhancer without affecting the levels of CIITA. J Immunol. 2007;178(10):6307–6315. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.178.10.6307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Schröder B. The multifaceted roles of the invariant chain CD74 - more than just a chaperone. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2016;1863(6 Pt A):1269–1281. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2016.03.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Mann M, Mehta A, de Boer CG, et al. Heterogeneous responses of hematopoietic stem cellsto inflammatory stimuliare altered with age. Cell Rep. 2018;25(11):2992–3005.:e5. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.11.056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Morita Y, Ema H, Nakauchi H. Heterogeneity and hierarchy within the most primitive hematopoietic stem cell compartment. J Exp Med. 2010;207(6):1173–1182. doi: 10.1084/jem.20091318. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Shin JY, Hu W, Naramura M, Park CY. High c-Kit expression identifies hematopoietic stem cells with impaired self-renewal and megakaryocytic bias. J Exp Med. 2014;211(2):217–231. doi: 10.1084/jem.20131128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Prins D, Park HJ, Watcham S, et al. The stem/progenitor landscape is reshaped in a mouse model of essential thrombocythemia and causes excess megakaryocyte production. Sci Adv. 2020;6(48):eabd3139. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abd3139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Belluschi S, Calderbank EF, Ciaurro V, et al. Myelo-lymphoid lineage restriction occurs in the human haematopoietic stem cell compartment before lymphoid-primed multipotent progenitors. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):4100. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-06442-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Notta F, Doulatov S, Laurenti E, Poeppl A, Jurisica I, Dick JE. Isolation of single human hematopoietic stem cells capable of longterm multilineage engraftment. Science. 2011;333(6039):218–221. doi: 10.1126/science.1201219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Walter D, Lier A, Geiselhart A, et al. Exit from dormancy provokes DNA-damage-induced attrition in haematopoietic stem cells. Nature. 2015;520(7548):549–552. doi: 10.1038/nature14131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Marié IJ, Brambilla L, Azzouz D, et al. Tonic interferon restricts pathogenic IL-17-driven inflammatory disease via balancing the microbiome. eLife. 2021;10:e68371. doi: 10.7554/eLife.68371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Gough DJ, Messina NL, Clarke CJ, Johnstone RW, Levy DE. Constitutive type I interferon modulates homeostatic balance through tonic signaling. Immunity. 2012;36(2):166–174. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2012.01.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Muller-Sieburg CE, Cho RH, Karlsson L, Huang JF, Sieburg HB. Myeloid-biased hematopoietic stem cells have extensive selfrenewal capacity but generate diminished lymphoid progeny with impaired IL-7 responsiveness. Blood. 2004;103(11):4111–4118. doi: 10.1182/blood-2003-10-3448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Dykstra B, Kent D, Bowie M, et al. Long-term propagation of distinct hematopoietic differentiation programs in vivo. Cell Stem Cell. 2007;1(2):218–229. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2007.05.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Yamamoto R, Morita Y, Ooehara J, et al. Clonal analysis unveils self-renewing lineage-restricted progenitors generated directly from hematopoietic stem cells. Cell. 2013;154(5):1112–1126. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.08.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Lu R, Neff NF, Quake SR, Weissman IL. Tracking single hematopoietic stem cells in vivo using high-throughput sequencing in conjunction with viral genetic barcoding. Nat Biotechnol. 2011;29(10):928–933. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Steimle V, Siegrist CA, Mottet A, Lisowska-Grospierre B, Mach B. Regulation of MHC class II expression by interferon-gamma mediated by the transactivator gene CIITA. Science. 1994;265(5168):106–109. doi: 10.1126/science.8016643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Bowling S, Sritharan D, Osorio FG, et al. An engineered CRISPR-Cas9 mouse line for simultaneous readout of lineage histories and gene expression profiles in single cells. Cell. 2020;181(7):1693–1694. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.06.018. [published correction appears in Cell.2020;181(6):1410-1422e27] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Rodriguez-Fraticelli AE, Weinreb C, Wang SW, et al. Single-cell lineage tracing unveils a role for TCF15 in haematopoiesis. Nature. 2020;583(7817):585–589. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2503-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Biton M, Haber AL, Rogel N, et al. T helper cell cytokines modulate intestinal stem cell renewal and differentiation. Cell. 2018;175(5):1307–1320.:e22. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.10.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Ali N, Zirak B, Rodriguez RS, et al. Regulatory T cells in skin facilitate epithelial stem cell differentiation. Cell. 2017;169(6):1119–1129.:e11. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.05.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Hirata Y, Furuhashi K, Ishii H, et al. CD150high bone marrow Tregs maintain hematopoietic stem cell quiescence and immune privilege via adenosine. Cell Stem Cell. 2018;22(3):445–453.:e5. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2018.01.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Muhlethaler-Mottet A, Di Berardino W, Otten LA, Mach B. Activation of the MHC class II transactivator CIITA by interferongamma requires cooperative interaction between Stat1 and USF-1. Immunity. 1998;8(2):157–166. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(00)80468-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental methods and figures
Supplemental table 1
Supplemental table 2
Supplemental table 3
Supplemental table 4
Supplemental table 5

RESOURCES