Skip to main content
UKPMC Funders Author Manuscripts logoLink to UKPMC Funders Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Rheumatology (Oxford). 2013 Feb 27;52(6):968–985. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/ket007

‘Friend or Foe’: high bone mineral density on routine bone density scanning (DXA), a review of causes and management

Celia L Gregson 1,2, Sarah A Hardcastle 1, Cyrus Cooper 2, Jonathan H Tobias 1
PMCID: PMC3651616  EMSID: EMS52785  PMID: 23445662

Abstract

A finding of high bone mineral density (BMD) on routine DXA scanning is not infrequent and most commonly reflects degenerative disease. However, BMD increases may also arise secondary to a range of underlying disorders affecting the skeleton. Although low BMD increases fracture risk, the converse may not hold for high BMD, since elevated BMD may occur in conditions where fracture risk is increased, unaffected or reduced.

Here we outline a classification for the causes of raised BMD, based upon identification of focal or generalised BMD changes, and discuss an approach to guide appropriate investigation by clinicians after careful interpretation of DXA scan findings within the context of the clinical history. We will also review the mild skeletal dysplasia associated with the currently unexplained High Bone Mass phenotype and discuss recent advances in osteoporosis therapies arising from improved understanding of rare inherited high BMD disorders.

Keywords: DXA, BMD, high bone mass, osteopetrosis, osteoarthritis

1.The definition of high BMD

Bone mineral density (BMD) measurement plays an important role in the assessment of osteoporosis and fracture risk. In clinical practice BMD is most commonly measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). BMD is then compared against an age, ethnicity and gender specific reference population to compute T and Z-scores (number of standard deviations a measured BMD differs from the mean BMD of a young adult population [T-score], or age-matched population [Z-score]). In 1994, the World Health Organization (WHO) defined osteoporosis in terms of BMD and fracture; a T-score of ≤-2.5 and/or a previous fragility fracture (1). Equivalent definitions for ‘high BMD’ do not currently exist. Whilst low BMD relates to increased fracture risk, the converse may not hold for high BMD. As we will discuss, high BMD may occur in conditions (i) with increased fracture risk (e.g. osteopetrosis or Paget’s disease), or (ii) such as artefacts which themselves do not affect fracture risk but may mask low BMD and (iii) where fracture risk may be reduced but other co-morbidities may exist which are only starting to be recognised.

The absence of an upper limit for BMD may risk those with high BMD, potentially due to underlying pathology, being labelled as ‘normal’ (2). In 2005, Michael Whyte advocated a high BMD definition of Z-score >+2.5 to highlight to clinicians the potential for underlying pathology (2). Epidemiological studies of high BMD are few and definition thresholds variable (3;4). Until recently high BMD was usually the reserve of case reports and case series. The first systematic analysis of patients undergoing routine clinical DXA scanning, encompassing 335,115 DXA scans across 15 UK centres, used a screening threshold T or Z-score ≥+4 at any lumbar/hip site (5). This study was the first to assess the prevalence of high BMD within the general population referred for DXA scanning.

2.The prevalence of high BMD

If BMD is normally distributed then a threshold Z-score of ≥+2.5 should by definition identify 6.2/1,000, and a more extreme Z-score ≥+4 would identify 3/100,000 (6). In fact, based upon assessment at 13 UK hospitals, 5/1,000 NHS DXA scans have a T/Z-score≥+4, approximately half of which are explained by artefactual elevations in BMD resulting from osteoarthritic degeneration. Of these incidental cases with high BMD, 35% had been referred due to a suspicion of osteoporosis and 22% because of an underlying medical condition necessitating bone assessment (5).

3.The causes of high BMD

Whilst a finding of high BMD on conventional DXA scanning most commonly reflects degenerative disease, increases in BMD can also arise secondary to an underlying disorder with skeletal effects. Here we outline a classification for the causes of raised BMD seen on DXA scanning (summarized in Table 1).

Table 1. Classification of the potential causes of a high BMD value detected by DXA scanning.

Artefactual causes of raised BMD – no true increase in bone mass
 Osteoarthritis
 DISH
 Ankylosing spondylitis
 Vertebral fractures
 Vascular calcification
 Thalassaemia major
 Abdominal abscesses
 Gallstones
 Renal calculi
 Gluteal silicon implants
 Gaucher’s disease
 Intestinal barium
 Surgical metalwork
 Laminectomy
 Vertebroplasty & kyphoplasty

True causes of increased bone mass and density
Localised Acquired Paget’s diseasea
Hypophosphatasiasa
Tumours Primary malignancies e.g. osteoblastoma
Secondary metastases e.g. prostate
Other tumours
SAPHO syndrome
Chronic infective osteomyelitis
Osseous tuberous sclerosis

Generalised Acquired Fluorosis
Renal osteodystrophy
Acromegaly
Hepatitis C associated osteosclerosis
Myelofibrosis
Mastocytosis
Oestrogen replacement implants

Congenital Reduced bone resorption
 (Table 2)
Osteopetrosis
Pycnodysostosis
Osteopoikilosis
Melorheostosis
Increased bone formation
 (Table 3)
Sclerosteosis
Van Buchem’s disease
LRP5 HBM
LRP4 HBM
Cranio-metaphyseal dysplasia
Disturbed formation & resorption
 (Table 3)
Camurati-Engelmann disease
Ghosal syndrome
Unexplained HBM

BMD: Bone Mineral Density, DISH: Diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis SAPHO: Synovitis, Acne, Pustulosis, Hyperostosis and Osteitis. LRP: low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein. HBM: High Bone Mass.

a

may be congenital

3.1.Artefactual elevations in BMD measurements

Artefactually raised BMD values do not equate to a true increase in bone mass, but usually result from artefactual elevations in calcium content, which can be recognised by careful inspection of the DXA scan in the context of the clinical history, some examples are shown in Figure 1. Artefact is important to differentiate as it may mask osteoporosis.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Examples of DXA images identified with a T/Z-score ≥+4

A: Artefactually raised lumbar spine BMD due to osteoarthritic spondylosis

B: Artefactually raised lumbar spine BMD due to ankylosing spondylitis, anterior longitudinal ligament ossification is seen

C: Generalised increase in lumbar spine BMD at all vertebral levels in a case of unexplained HBM

3.1.1.Osteoarthritic spondylosis

Osteoarthritic spondylosis most commonly explains artefactual elevations in calcium content, due to abnormally dense bone at the vertebral margins forming vertebral end-plate sclerosis, facet joint sclerosis and osteophytes (Figure 1a). Facet joint osteoarthritis (OA) is particularly marked in the lower lumbar spine, giving the recognized pattern of progressive osteoarthritic changes seen in sequential descending lumbar vertebrae, which correlates with rising BMD measures caudally down the spine (7). Even mild osteophytosis can result in a 24% increase in lumbar BMD (8). Osteoarthritic spondylosis accounts for 49% of T/Z-score≥+4 on routine DXA assessments (5). Conversely osteoarthritic effects on femoral neck BMD are minimal (9).

In clinical practice, where osteoarthritic changes are restricted to one or two vertebrae, these are excluded and the lumbar spine DXA result is based upon the mean value of unaffected vertebrae. Confirmatory radiographs are generally not required, as changes suggestive of spondylosis (e.g. end-plate sclerosis, preferential effects on lower lumbar vertebrae) are evident on DXA scan inspection, which may also reveal abnormalities underlying osteoarthritic changes (e.g. scoliosis).

3.1.2.Diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH)

DISH is a skeletal disorder characterised by widespread calcification at spinal and extra-spinal sites. Although the aetiology is unknown, DISH has been associated with features of the metabolic syndrome (10;11). Ossification of spinal ligaments in DISH can overestimate vertebral areal BMD from 24 to 39% and may mask osteoporosis on DXA scanning (12;13). Amongst older men, in whom DISH is common; DISH has been associated with increased vertebral fracture risk (14). The prevalence of DISH rises sharply with age and varies according to ethnicity (15).

3.1.3.Ankylosing spondylitis (AS)

Syndesmophyte formation at vertebral margins in advanced AS can elevate spinal BMD by increasing calcium content (16). This is compounded by anterior longitudinal ligament ossification, plus co-existent scoliosis and inflammation (Figure 1b). Spinal DXA BMD measurements may therefore be high despite loss of trabecular bone resulting in increased fracture risk (particularly vertebral fracture) (17;18). Hip BMD, is affected less by bony changes in AS and therefore hip DXA has been suggested as a more reliable method to assess fracture risk in these patients (17;18).

3.1.4.Vertebral fracture

In vertebral fracture bone mineral content is unchanged, but BMD increases due to a reduction in the denominator (i.e. vertebral area). Although absolute elevations in BMD may be modest, this mechanism is a common artefactual cause for BMD gain during serial DXA monitoring for osteoporosis (19). Reduction in vertebral area contrasts with the normal finding of successive increases in vertebral area when moving down the spine. In clinical practice, affected vertebrae should be excluded from DXA analysis and mean BMD calculated from the remaining lumbar vertebrae. Although vertebral fractures can be detected by conventional lumbar DXA, vertebral height loss is more accurately quantified by lateral DXA (20). Following vertebroplasty, polymethylmethacrylate cement will also elevate measured BMD.

3.1.5.Extrinsic artefacts

Calcification of structures anterior to the spine but within the DXA field can artefactually elevate BMD measurements. Although vascular calcification of the abdominal aorta is common, reported in 43% of patients having lumbar DXA assessment (mean age 68 years), there is little evidence from human studies that this significantly affects lumbar spine BMD measures (7;8;21-23). Other radio-dense materials can elevate BMD values. Soft-tissue iron deposition in thalassaemia major, usually associated with osteoporosis, has been reported to lead to a T-score of up to +4.9′ when interestingly the lateral DXA view showed the increased density to lie anterior to the vertebral body with the remaining vertebrae registering a T-score of +0.30, presumably representing soft-tissue iron deposition (24). Similarly abdominal abscesses which can calcify (25), gallstones (26;27), renal calculi (27) and gluteal silicon implants (28) have been linked with erroneous high BMD values. Gaucher’s disease, with excess glycolipid within an overlying enlarged spleen, has been associated with high BMD particularly at L1 (Z-score +3.8), despite co-existent low hip BMD, possibly reflecting the high glycolipid load or secondary calcification in the spleen (5). Radiological barium administration into overlying bowel may falsely elevate BMD, though not reported to date. Surgical metalwork explains 1.4% of incidental high BMDs on routine DXA scanning (5). Laminectomy can also increase BMD values (29).

3.2.Focal abnormalities causing increased BMD measurements

Focal increases in bone mass can significantly alter BMD measurements. The abnormal site is usually restricted to one or two specific vertebrae or a hip. However, multiple vertebral involvement can be difficult to distinguish from generalised causes described below.

3.2.1.Paget’s disease

Paget’s disease commonly affects the lumbar spine and hips and has a declining UK age-adjusted prevalence of 2.5% and 1.6% for men and women respectively (30). Paget’s disease, often asymptomatic for many years before diagnosis, explains 1.4% of incidental high BMD values (5). Excess disorganized woven and lamellar bone expands bone size and raises density, increasing risk of deformity and fracture. Paget’s disease may be monostotic (affecting an isolated vertebra) and, after the pelvis, most commonly affects lower lumbar vertebrae (31).

3.2.2.Tumours

Important not to miss, these most commonly occur as osteosclerotic secondary deposits from primary malignancies e.g. prostate. Breast metastases classically cause osteolytic lesions, but can be osteosclerotic (32), as can gastric (33), colonic (34) and cervical (35) metastases. Increased BMD at an isolated vertebra can reflect a spinal osteoblastoma (36), Ewing’s sarcoma (37), carcinoid (38), haemangioma (39) or plasmacytoma (40) both of which can calcify (41;42)) and Hodgkin’s disease (5.8% of patients have spinal involvement, but osteosclerotic lesions are rarer than osteolytic) (43;44). Skeletal complications of radiotherapy can increase BMD, e.g. pathological fractures, secondary neoplasms. However, spinal osteoradionecrosis does not generally increase BMD, as marrow is replaced by lower density fat (45).

3.2.3.Tuberous Sclerosis

Tuberous sclerosis is a rare, autosomal dominant disorder (OMIM 191100) of dysfunctional hamartin and tuberin production, with skeletal manifestations including bone cysts, skull and digital sclerosis and scoliosis (46). Cortical thickening and increased bone density have been reported on plain radiographs, but DXA values have not been evaluated (47). Learning difficulties, seizures, cardiac rhabdomyomas, haematuria from renal angiomyolipomas and dermatological features manifest variably (48).

3.2.4.SAPHO Syndrome

SAPHO syndrome (Synovitis, Acne, Pustulosis, Hyperostosis and Osteitis) is rare and poorly understood, possibly explained by infection (Propionibacterium acnes). With features similar to the spondyloarthropathies, up to a half suffer vertebral involvement (more frequently thoracic than lumbar) including osteosclerosis, hyperostosis, para-vertebral ossification and rarely vertebral collapse (49;50). Case-series focus on MRI and CT assessment rather than DXA, but BMD is likely to be elevated.

3.3.Generalised abnormalities causing high BMD measurements: Acquired

Osteosclerosis (Greek etymology: ‘osteo’ – bone, ‘sclerosis’ – hardening of a tissue) generally occurs diffusely within the axial skeleton, although focal patterns may also occur, secondary to exaggerated trabecular and/or cortical bone formation.

3.3.1.Fluorosis

Fluoride causes diffuse axial osteosclerosis with ligamentous calcification, periostitis and vertebral osteophytosis, and has been associated with excessive tea and toothpaste consumption and was historically trialled as an osteoporotic therapy (51-54). Tea leaves accumulate fluoride absorbed from the soil. Bone turnover markers (alkaline phosphatase [ALP], osteocalcin and C-terminal cross-linking telopeptides of type I collagen [CTX]) and BMD can be elevated (Z-scores +14 [lumbar], +7 [hip] but −0.6 [distal radius]), with enhanced cancellous bone formation on iliac crest biopsy (55). Renal calculi have been associated (55). Fluoride treatment does not reduce vertebral fracture risk (56;57).

3.3.2.Renal osteodystrophy

Osteomalacia and soft-tissue calcification are common, but renal osteodystrophy may be associated with regions of excessively mineralised bone tissue affecting the ribs, pelvis and spine. Osteosclerosis can produce the classical ‘rugger jersey spine’ X-ray appearance, characterised by sclerotic bands along multiple superior and inferior vertebral endplates, with relative central lucency (58;59).

3.3.3.Acromegaly

Untreated acromegaly is characterised by increased bone turnover. Excess growth hormone and IGF-1 (insulin-like growth factor 1) are anabolic, predominantly affecting cortical, rather than trabecular bone (so increasing femoral rather than lumbar BMD) (60;61). However, reported hip Z-scores +1.3 likely reflect anabolic attenuation by concurrent hypogonadism (62). BMD changes may persist during disease remission (63).

3.3.4.Hepatitis C-Associated Osteosclerosis (HCAO)

Since 1992 diffuse acquired osteosclerosis, with characteristic cranial sparing, has been reported in fewer than 20 cases globally associated with hepatitis C virus infection (64-79). In addition to markedly elevated ALP, IGF proteins are apparently elevated promoting bone formation, increasing osteoprotegerin (OPG) and reducing receptor activator of nuclear factor-Kβ ligand (RANKL) levels (69;80). Remarkably, in a case report, lumbar spine and femoral neck T-scores of +5.5 and +15.9 respectively fell to +0.5 and +4.0 after 7 years of successful ribavirin and interferon antiviral treatment (81); the underlying mechanism remains unclear.

3.3.5.Myelofibrosis

Myelofibrosis is a rare chronic myeloproliferative disorder of bone marrow fibrosis, causing marked splenomegaly and osteosclerosis, with incidence 0.21/100,000 person-years (82). Small, sharp bone spicules develop within the bone marrow cavity; increasing BMD (Z-scores ranging from +2 to +6) and bone turnover in one case series of 4 men (83).

3.3.6.Mastocytosis

A disease of widespread mast cell tissue infiltration, mastocytosis has been associated with both osteoporosis and osteosclerosis. Osteosclerosis is reported in more severe disease associated with higher serum tryptase levels and higher bone turnover (84-87). The mechanisms are poorly understood, but severe disease, with greater histamine production, may stimulate osteoblastic bone formation, whilst tryptase may increase osteoprotogerin reducing osteoclast activity, favouring osteosclerosis rather than osteoporosis (85;88). Disordered serotonin synthesis, also a feature, does not explain BMD variations (89).

3.3.7.Oestrogen implants

Historical use of long-term (i.e. >14 years) high dose oestradiol implant therapy in women following surgical menopause has been associated with increased BMD in a handful of cases, with mean (SD) spinal and femoral neck T-score +1.7 (±2.0) and +1.2 (±1.4) respectively (90). Histomorphometry suggested anabolic skeletal effects through increased osteoblastic activity.

3.4.Generalised abnormalities causing high BMD measurements: Inherited

Several rare genetic disorders with skeletal effects, collectively termed sclerosing bone dysplasias and osteopetroses, are associated with generalised increased BMD (91). Unlike spondylosis affecting multiple vertebrae, these will elevate hip as well as lumbar spine BMD. However, changes in bone structure and quantity have variable effects on fracture risk. In addition to a clinical separation based upon increased or decreased fracture risk, a biological separation can be made into disorders in which (i) bone resorption is depressed (table 2), (ii) bone formation is enhanced (table 3), and (iii) balance is disturbed between both bone formation and resorption (table 3).

Table 2. Osteopetrotic conditions; the gene defects, function and clinical characteristics.

Condition OMIM Inheritance Gene Mutation Protein Function Symptoms Reference
Severe/neonatal/
infantile/
autosomal
recessive
osteopetrosis a
259700
604592
AR TCIRG1 Loss of
function
T-cell, immune regulator 1, H+
transporting, lysosomal subunit
A3 of V-ATPase pump
Acidification of the
resorption lacuna
Fractures, infections (e.g.
osteomyelitis), macrocephaly,
frontal bossing, neurologic
symptoms, CN compression,
blindness, deafness, delayed tooth
eruption, haemopoietic failure,
death (usually before aged 10)
(82;88;149)
602727 AR CLCN7 Loss of
function
Chloride Channel Acidification of the
resorption lacuna
607649 AR OSTM1 Loss of
function
Osteopetrosis associated
transmembrane protein 1
β-subunit for CLC-7
602642 AR RANKL/
TNFSF11
Loss of
function
Receptor Activator for Nuclear
Factor k B ligand/tumour
necrosis factor (ligand)
superfamily, member 11
Osteoclastogenesis,
resorption, survival
Osteoclast poor osteopetrosis.
Fractures, hydrocephalus,
nystagmus, seizures,
hypersplenism, less severe course
than TCIRG1, CLCN7, OSTN1
mutations
(150)
603499 AR RANK/
TNFRSF11A
Loss of
function
Receptor Activator for Nuclear
Factor k Bb
Osteoclastogenesis,
resorption, survival
Intermediate
autosomal
recessive
osteopetrosis
259710 AR CLCN7 Partial loss
of function
Chloride Channel Acidification of the
resorption lacuna
Onset in childhood, fractures, short
stature, cranial nerve compression
(88;151)
259700,
611497
AR PLEKHM1 Loss of
function
Pleckstrin homology domain
containing, family M (with RUN
domain) member 1
Vesicular trafficking Osteopetrosis of the skull only (L2-
L4 T-score −2.3). Fractures. Raised
osteocalcin
(152)
Osteopetrosis with
renal tubular
acidosis
259730,
611492
AR CAII Loss of
function
Carbonic anhydrase II Intracellular
acidification
Developmental delay, short
stature, CN compression,
blindness, dental complications,
fractures, maintained
haemopoietic function.
(82;88)
Osteopetrosis with
ectodermal dysplasia
and immune defect
(OLEDAID)
300301 XL IKBKG Loss of
function
Inhibitor of kappa light
polypeptide gene enhancer in
B-cells, kinase gamma (NEMO)
Unknown Lymphoedema, severe infections,
no teeth, skin abnormalities, early
death
(149)
Leucocyte adhesion
deficiency syndrome
(LAD-III) and
osteopetrosis
612840 AR Kindlin-3/
FERMT3
Loss of
function
Kindlin-3 Cell adhesion Bacterial infections, bleeding,
osteopetrosis,
hepatosplenomegaly
(153)
612840 AR CalDAG-
GEF1
Loss of
function
Calcium and diaclyglycerol-
regulated guanine nucleotide
exchange factor 1
(154)
Late onset
osteopetrosis
(Albers-Schönberg
disease) ADOII
166600 AD CLCN7 Dominant
negative
effect
Chloride Channel Acidification of the
resorption lacuna
Classic radiographic features,
fractures, nerve compression,
osteomyelitis, dental
complications.
(88-92)
Pycnodysostosis 265800,
601105
AR CTSK Loss of
function
Cathepsin K Collagen
degradation
Delayed cranial suture closure,
short stature and phalanges, dental
abnormalities, fractures
(101-103)
Osteopoikilosis 155950 AD LEMD3/
MAN1
Loss of
function
LEM domain-containing 3 LEMD3 antagonizes
the BMP and TGFb
signalling pathways
Benign, incidental osteosclerotic
foci (can mimic metastases)c
(88;155;156)
Melorheostosis 155950 AD LEMD3/
MAN1
Loss of
function
LEM domain-containing 3 Characteristic radiographic
featuresd, soft tissue symptoms
Osteopathia striatad
with cranial stenosis
300373 XL WTX Loss of
function
Wilms tumour gene on the X
chromosome
Wnt signalling
suppression
Macrocephaly, CN compression,
cleft palate, skull/long bone
sclerosis in females.
Usually lethal in males
(157)

XL: X-linked. CN: Cranial Nerve. ADOII: Autosomal dominant type 2 osteopetrosis.

a

ARO incidence is 1/200,000-300,000 live births (149).

b

As well as an osteoclast poor ARO phenotype, RANK mutations have also been linked to the Paget’s - like diseases (familial expansile osteolysis, expansile skeletal hyperphosphatasia and early-onset Paget’s disease) (158;159).

c

When associated with connective tissue naevi, dermatofibrosis lenticularis disseminata then termed Buschke-Ollendorff syndrome (88;155;160).

d

asymmetric ‘flowing hyperostosis’ or ‘dripping candle wax’. Approximately 200 cases described to date. Soft tissue changes (hypertrichosis, fibromas, haemangiomas and pain) associated with radiographic features in sclerotome. Contractures can develop (88;155;156;161).

e

can occur in combination with focal dermal hypoplasia, skin pigmentation, hypoplastic teeth, syndactyly, ocular defects and fat herniation through skin and is known as Goltz Syndrome (157;162-164).

Table 3. Inherited HBM conditions due to enhanced bone formation, or disturbed formation and resorption; the gene defects, function and clinical characteristics.

Condition OMIM Inheritance Gene Mutation Protein Function Symptoms Reference
Increased bone formation
Sclerosteosis 269500 AR SOST Loss of
function
Sclerostin Osteoblast wnt
signalling inhibitor
Cutaneous digital syndactyly, excessive height.
Skull/mandible thickening, toria, CN palsies (incl.
neonatal). Headaches, raised ICP, coning.
Back/bone pain. Fracture resistance
(107;111;165;
166)
Van Buchem’s
Disease b
239100 AR SOST c Reduced
function
Sclerostin Osteoblast wnt
signalling inhibitor
No syndactyly, no excess height. Skull/mandible
thickening, toria, CN palsies. Headaches,
back/bone pain. Fracture resistance
(107;167;168)
LRP5 HBM 603506 AD LRP5 Gain of
function
LRP5 Osteoblast cell
membrane co-
receptor regulating
wnt signalling
Asymptomatic or toria, skull/mandible thickening,
CN palsies, neuropathy, neuralgia, headaches,
back/bone pain, spinal stenosis, reduced
buoyancy, craniosyntosis. Fracture resistance.
(84;117-
132;134)
LRP4 HBM 604270 AD & AR LRP4 Loss of
function
LRP4 Impaired sclerostin-
LRP4 interaction
Syndactyly, dysplastic nails, gait disturbance,
facial nerve palsy, deafness
(169)
Cranio-metaphyseal
dysplasia
123000
218400
AD & AR ANKH Loss of
function
ANK Osteoclast-reactive
vacuolar proton
pump
Macrocephaly, cranial hyperostosis CN palsies,
wide nasal bridge, dental overcrowding,
metaphyseal flaring
(170;171)
Disturbed balance between bone formation and resorption
Camurati-Engelmann
disease d
131300 AD TGFβ1 Probable
gain of
function
TGFβ Stimulates both
osteoblast &
osteoclast activity
Onset before 30 years, variable phenotype.
Thickened diaphyseal cortices, limb pain,
fatigability, muscle weakness, waddling gait.
Variably raised ALP, reduced calcium & anaemia
(172-177)
Ghosal
haematodiaphyseal
syndrome
274180 AR TBXAS1 Loss of
function
Thromb-
oxane
synthase
Modulates RANKL
& OPG expression
Impaired platelet aggregation, (steroid-sensitive)
anaemia. Similar to Camurati-Engelmann but
metaphyses affected
(178;179)

OMIM®: Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man. CN: Cranial Nerve. ICP: Intracranial pressure. RANKL: Receptor Activator of Nuclear Factor-kβ Ligand OPG: Osteoprotegerin

a

Tori: Oral exostoses which include torus palatinus & mandibularis found in approximately 25% of a general Caucasian population (180).

b

Initially known as hyperostosis corticalis generalisata familiaris (167;168).

c

A 52-kb intronic deletion downstream of SOST.

d

Also known as progressive diaphyseal dysplasia

3.4.1.Decreased bone resorption

The osteopetroses (Greek etymology: ‘petro’ - to turn to stone) are rare genetic conditions of reduced osteoclastic bone resorption. Defective bone remodelling during growth induces skeletal sclerosis and abnormally dense but brittle bones; first described by Albers-Schönberg as ‘marble bone disease’ (92;93). Osteopetrosis is classified by clinical severity (table 2); autosomal dominant osteopetrosis was historically subdivided into ADO type I and type II. ADOI, subsequently identified as secondary to an LRP5 (low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 5) mutation (94) (discussed later), is not a primary osteoclast disease, is not characterised by bone fragility and is better not considered as an osteopetrosis. Two osteopetroses pertinent to adulthood are discussed below.

3.4.1a.Autosomal Dominant Osteopetrosis II (ADOII)

ADOII (Albers-Schönberg disease) is caused by a CLCN7 mutation with penetrance between 60 & 80% giving a varied clinical phenotype, including detection as an incidental radiographic finding (95). Prevalence is estimated between 0.2 and 5.5/100,000 (96;97). The phenotype can include facial nerve palsy, visual loss (in 5-25%), carpal tunnel syndrome, hip osteoarthritis (in 7%), increased fracture risk and delayed fracture healing, osteomyelitis (in 10-13%), particularly of the mandible, dental abscesses (10%) and deep decay (36%) and in extreme cases bone marrow failure (≈3%) (98-102). In one case series of 94 CLCN7 mutation cases almost every adult (98%) had experienced a fracture (including half of their hip), with a third having fractured more than once (five had >15 fractures) (101). Amongst another 42 cases from 10 families, age range 7-70 years, the mean number of fractures per person was 4.4 (102). However, these case series are not performed systematically so patterns are difficult to generalise.

Radiographs feature (a) vertebral end-plate thickening (‘rugger-jersey spine’), (b) ‘bone-within-bone’ particularly in the pelvis and (c) transverse sclerotic bands within the distal femorae (99;102). However, the radiological phenotype is not ubiquitous (≈60-90%) (96;103). DXA BMD Z-score ranges from +3 to +15 (99;101). The CLCN7 protein functions as a voltage-gated Cl-/H+ ion channel and is found in lysosomes and on the ruffled boarder of osteoclasts. By acid efflux, it facilitates inorganic bone matrix dissolution (104). Multiple mutations have been identified in association with the range of osteopetrotic phenotypes (105-107).

3.4.1b.Pycnodysostosis

First described in 1962 and said to be the malady of both Toulouse-Lautrec and Aesop (of fable renown) (108-110), pycnodysostosis is caused by defective enzymatic degradation of organic bone matrix, due to an autosomal recessive mutation in the gene coding cathepsin K (111). To date 27 mutations have been reported amongst fewer than 200 cases globally (111-113). Secreted by osteoclasts, cathepsin K cleaves type I collagen (114). The characteristic bone dysplasia includes skull deformities, under-developed facial bones with micrognathia, beaked nose, short stature and phalanges, dental caries, persistence of deciduous teeth and abnormally dense but brittle bones (98;111-113;115). Interestingly, understanding of pycnodysostosis has prompted development of a novel class of anti-resorptive therapy currently in trial (e.g. odanacatib) (116) (Table 4).

Table 4. Examples of how understanding HBM conditions has helped inform development of new osteoporosis therapies.
HBM condition Molecular target Drugs in development Reference
Pycnodysostosis Cathepsin K Cathepsin K inhibitors:
• Odanacatib (Phase III trial)
• Balicatib (trials discontinued due
 to dermatological side effects)
(106)
(181;182)
Sclerosteosis &
Van Buchem’s disease
Sclerostin • Anti-SOST antibodies (109;110)
LRP5 HBM &
Osteoporosis Pseudoglioma
Syndrome (OPPG)
Inhibition of natural
antagonists of osteoblastic
Wnt signalling
• Glycogen synthase kinase-3β
 (GSK3β) inhibitors
• Dickkopf 1 (Dkk1) antibodies
• Secreted Frizzled-related protein-1
 (Sfrp1) inhibitors
(183)
(184;185)
(186)

HBM: High Bone Mass. LRP5: low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 5

3.4.2.Increased bone formation

3.4.2a.Sclerosteosis and van Buchem’s disease

Sclerosteosis and van Buchem’s disease are clinically similar conditions of generalised enhanced bone formation, increased bone strength and resistance to fracture due to reduced levels of sclerostin (117). It is thought mechanical loading reduces osteocytic production of sclerostin, permitting activation of osteoblastic wnt signalling and bone formation (118). At least 3 pharmaceutical companies are currently developing anti-sclerostin antibodies (119;120) (Table 4). Loss-of-function SOST gene mutations cause sclerosteosis, whereas a 52-kb intronic deletion downstream of SOST, thought to disrupt post-transcriptional sclerostin processing, results in the milder phenotype of van Buchem’s disease.

Sclerosteosis causes ‘gigantism’, mandible enlargement, torus palatinus & mandibularis which complicate tooth extractions (121;122). Calvarial overgrowth compresses cranial nerves, particularly facial nerves, sometimes from infancy; in one series 83% of 63 adults had recurrent facial nerve palsies (121). Hearing loss and headaches are common; craniotomy to alleviate raised intracranial pressure and sudden death by coning is not uncommon (121;123). Cutaneous syndactyly of fingers (present in 76%) and toes is an important defining feature, often accompanying dysplastic or absent nails and camptodactaly (121;123;124). Sclerosteosis is progressive, which may cause bone and back pain requiring spinal decompression (121).

van Buchem’s disease is milder than sclerosteosis, importantly without syndactyly or ‘gigantism’ (117;123). Cranial nerve impingements and hearing loss remain common (125). Management is generally limited to surgical bone removal; however, glucocorticoids have been used to reduce high bone turnover in an isolated case-report (126).

3.4.2b.LRP5 High Bone Mass

Ten activating LRP5 mutations affecting 23 families globally have now been reported (94;127-142). Initially cases were described as asymptomatic with mandible enlargement, osseous tori, a marked resistance to fracture (e.g. in car accidents), thickened cortices on radiographs (without reduced haemopoietic capacity), normal biochemistry and BMD Z-scores +3 to +8 (127;143). However, subsequent case-reports describe complications secondary to bone overgrowth: nerve compression causing deafness, cranial nerve palsies, congenital strabismus, sensorimotor neuropathy, spinal stenosis, paresthesias, trigeminal neuralgia (130;131), in addition to headaches, bone pain and reduced buoyancy (129;130). The G640A mutation is the only one to link LRP5 with craniosynostosis requiring craniotomy, developmental delay and a profoundly dysmorphic and pathological phenotype including ventricular septal defect (VSD) (132). Osteocalcin levels are raised or normal (129;130;143). LRP5 codes for an essential cell membrane co-receptor within the wnt signalling pathway, regulating osteoblastic bone formation (144). Conversely inactivating LRP5 mutations cause autosomal recessive osteoporosis pseudoglioma syndrome (OPPG) (145).

3.4.3.Unexplained High Bone Mass

There remains a population, even after exclusion of all of these listed conditions, with a sporadic finding of generalised raised BMD (Z-score ≥+3.2 at either L1 or hip) on routine DXA scanning, with unexplained HBM in whom fracture risk is not increased, associated with clinical characteristics suggestive of a mild skeletal dysplasia namely poor buoyancy, mandible enlargement, extra bone at the site of tendon and ligament insertions, broad skeletal frame and larger shoe size, as well as an increased BMI (5). Considered to be relatively benign, this picture explains 35% of incidental findings of raised BMD on routine DXA scanning. As 41% have a first-degree relative with a similar phenotype, it is thought to be an inherited condition. Research is currently underway to identify the genetic cause and fully evaluate the associated phenotype, e.g. metabolic, muscular and joint characteristics, to inform clinical management.

Recent findings suggest HBM is characterised by increased trabecular BMD and by alterations in cortical bone density and structure, leading to substantial increments in predicted cortical bone strength. Neither trabecular nor cortical BMD appear to decline with age in the tibia of HBM cases, suggesting attenuation of age-related bone loss in weight-bearing limbs may contribute to their bone phenotype (146). Furthermore, body composition assessment suggests that HBM is associated with a marked increase in fat mass, particularly android fat, in women but not men (147). Although elevated BMI is not a recognised feature of skeletal dysplasia, interestingly, a similar finding has been reported in families of HBM due to an activating LRP5 mutation (148).

Lastly, studying HBM may improve our understanding of osteoarthritis (OA). An inverse relationship between osteoporosis and OA is well documented, with higher hip and/or lumbar spine BMD in individuals with radiographic OA (149-152). However, osteophytes can artefactually increase measured BMD (9) and, counter-intuitively, fracture risk is not reduced in OA (153;154). Potential mechanisms linking increased BMD with OA include (i) increased subchondral bone stiffness increasing articular cartilage stresses and damage (155), (ii) activation of the wnt signalling pathway, thought to have a role in both joint formation and maintenance of joint homeostasis in later life (156) (supported by β-catenin upregulation in knee joint cartilage prior to joint replacement (157)) and (iii) molecular cross-talk between bone and cartilage arising through increased permeability of the bone-cartilage interface (158;159). Large joint OA has been reported in ADOII and LRP5 HBM (102;130;141), and unexplained HBM has recently been associated with an increased prevalence of joint replacement (Hardcastle et al, manuscript in review) (160), suggesting that increased OA risk may represent a further, hitherto unrecognised, consequence of elevated BMD.

4.The investigation & management of a raised BMD

Initial inspection should classify BMD rises as focal or generalised (spine, hip or both). Focal increases in BMD should be carefully inspected for osteoarthritic changes, which if clearly visible, require no further imaging. Otherwise AP/lateral lumbar spine ±pelvis plain X-rays are initially recommended with routine bone biochemistry and inflammatory markers. MRI may be required, particularly if examination prompts doubt regarding spinal cord compression or X-rays raise the possibility of malignancy. Lateral DXA can help with vertebral fracture assessment. Suspected malignancy may require mammography, isotope bone scan, prostate assessment and tumour markers. ALP is usually lowered in hypophosphatasia and raised in active Paget’s disease, although up to 5% will have a normal ALP in Paget’s disease (161).

Generalised increased BMD affecting both spine and hip are less commonly seen and the differential diagnosis is wide. Outpatient clinic assessment should include questioning regarding fluoride exposure, hepatitis C risk factors, headaches, bone pain and in women historical oestrogen implant use, plus examination for stigmata of acromegaly, bone overgrowth, nerve compression, splenomegaly (in haemopoeitic failure) and dysmorphism suggestive of a mild skeletal dysplasia associated with unexplained HBM. A careful fracture history is essential, including the family history. Blood tests should include bone biochemistry, renal function, FBC and clotting studies, liver function and Hepatitis C serology, plus potentially serum fluoride levels, IGF1 ± an oral glucose tolerance test if acromegaly is suspected, serum tryptase if mastocytosis is suspected. Bone turnover markers (P1NP and serum CTX) may be useful.

Potentially relevant plain radiographs include AP/lateral lumbar spine, pelvis, bilateral femorae and lateral skull. In ADOII radiographs show the classical ‘rugger-jersey spine’ due to vertebral end-plate thickening, ‘bone-within-bone’ often seen in the pelvis and transverse sclerotic bands within the distal femoral (99;102). DXA examination showing low distal radius BMD would support the diagnosis of fluorosis; (cranial sparing on whole body DXA scanning, if available, would support HCAO). Hip and lumbar spine DXA scans in first-degree relatives will help identify relatively asymptomatic inherited high bone mass conditions. If specific characteristic features suggest a monogenic disorder such as osteopetrosis or sclerosteosis, referral to local clinical genetic services for counselling and genotyping should be considered depending upon the severity of symptoms and the family history.

If an inherited condition of increased bone formation is suspected, a number of investigations may be helpful in establishing the severity of the phenotype. Visual field assessment and formal audiology are important as cranial nerve impingement can be managed by surgical decompression. For similar reasons CT/MRI skull, MRI spine and nerve conduction studies may be helpful. Assessment by dental and/or maxillofacial specialists may be needed. Examination should include cardiovascular examination, and if a severe LRP5 mutation is suspected cardiac echocardiography may be needed to exclude VSD. An approach to investigating high BMD measurements is summarised in Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Flow diagram to guide the investigation and management of raised BMD identified on DXA scanning

DXA: dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. BMD: Bone mineral density. DISH: Diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis. OA: osteoarthritis. SAPHO: Synovitis, Acne, Pustulosis, Hyperostosis and Osteitis. Ca2+: Calcium. ALP: Alkaline phosphatase. PSA: Prostate specific antigen. PV: Plasma viscosity. CRP: Creactive protein. AP: Antero-posterior. MRI: Magnetic resonance imaging. HCAO: Hepatitis C-Associated Osteosclerosis. U+E: Urea and electrolytes. PO4: Phosphate. IGF-1: Insulin-like growth factor 1. OGTT: Oral glucose tolerance test. LFTs: Liver function tests. P1NP: N-terminal propeptides of type I procollagen. CTX: C-terminal cross-linking telopeptides of type I collagen. FBC: Full blood count. CT: Computer tomography.

*up to 5% with Paget’s disease will have a normal ALP (161). Potential diagnoses are each given a superscript digit, to which the investigations then relate.

5.Conclusion

A BMD T/Z-score >+2.5 does not generally indicate ‘normal’ bone density, but is usually caused by an artefactual increase in BMD secondary to lumbar spondylosis which is readily identifiable from inspection of the DXA scan image. However, high BMD measurements may arise from a genuine increase in bone mass. This may be caused by a focal abnormality within the DXA field, such as a Pagetic lumbar vertebra, or a generalised skeletal abnormality resulting from acquired osteosclerosis, or rarely a genetic mutation leading to a sclerosing bone dysplasia. The most common form of sclerosing dysplasia is the currently unexplained HBM phenotype, characterised by a mild skeletal dysplasia; unlike the osteopetroses, this does not convey an increase in fracture risk.

Knowledge of rare genetic skeletal dysplasias has helped guide innovative treatments for osteoporosis (table 4), for example from our understanding of pycnodysostosis odanacatib has developed (116), as have anti-sclerostin antibodies from our experience of sclerosteosis and van Buchem’s disease (119). Yet much HBM remains unexplained, better appreciation of which may translate into improved understanding of bone regulation and new therapeutic targets for future osteoporosis therapies, as well as aiding management through greater understanding of associated co-morbidities.

Here we have presented a classification for the potential causes of a raised BMD detected by DXA scanning as part of normal clinical practice. This classification should help guide clinical evaluation and diagnosis when the DXA scan is interpreted within the context of the clinical history.

Key messages.

  1. A BMD T/Z-score >+2.5 does not generally indicate ‘normal’ bone density but warrants evaluation

  2. Lumbar osteoarthritic spondylosis accounts for half of T/Z-scores ≥+4 found on routine DXA scanning

  3. When BMD is raised, clinical sequelae depend upon the cause, which needs establishing

Acknowledgments

Funding

The High Bone Mass study was supported by The Wellcome Trust and the NIHR CRN (portfolio number 5163). CLG was funded through a Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Training Fellowship (080280/Z/06/Z) and is currently funded by the Medical Research Council at the University of Southampton. SAH is funded through an Arthritis Research UK Clinical PhD Studentship (grant reference 19580).

Footnotes

Author’s disclosure

The authors have no conflicts of interest

Reference List

  • (1).World Health Organization . Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis. 1994. (Technical Report Series). Report No.: 843. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (2).Whyte MP. Misinterpretation of osteodensitometry with high bone density: BMD Z > or = + 2.5 is not “normal”. J Clin Densitom. 2005;8(1):1–6. doi: 10.1385/jcd:8:1:001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (3).Morin S, Leslie W. High bone mineral density is associated with high body mass index. Osteoporosis International. 2009 Jul 1;20(7):1267–71. doi: 10.1007/s00198-008-0797-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (4).Duncan EL, Danoy P, Kemp JP, Leo PJ, McCloskey E, Nicholson GC, et al. Genome-Wide Association Study Using Extreme Truncate Selection Identifies Novel Genes Affecting Bone Mineral Density and Fracture Risk. PLoS Genet. 2011 Apr 21;7(4):e1001372. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (5).Gregson CL, Steel SA, O’Rourke KP, Allan K, Ayuk J, Bhalla A, et al. ‘Sink or swim’: an evaluation of the clinical characteristics of individuals with high bone mass. Osteoporos Int. 2012;23(2):643–54. doi: 10.1007/s00198-011-1603-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (6).White J, Yeats A, Skipworth G. Tables for Statisticians. 3rd ed. Stanley Thornes; Cheltenham: 1979. [Google Scholar]
  • (7).Drinka PJ, DeSmet AA, Bauwens SF, Rogot A. The effect of overlying calcification on lumbar bone densitometry. Calcif Tissue Int. 1992 Jun;50(6):507–10. doi: 10.1007/BF00582163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (8).Masud T, Langley S, Wiltshire P, Doyle DV, Spector TD. Effect of spinal osteophytosis on bone mineral density measurements in vertebral osteoporosis. BMJ. 1993 Jul 17;307(6897):172–3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.307.6897.172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (9).Liu G, Peacock M, Eilam O, Dorulla G, Braunstein E, Johnston CC. Effect of osteoarthritis in the lumbar spine and hip on bone mineral density and diagnosis of osteoporosis in elderly men and women. Osteoporos Int. 1997;7(6):564–9. doi: 10.1007/BF02652563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (10).Denko C, Malemud C. Body mass index and blood glucose: correlations with serum insulin, growth hormone, and insulin-like growth factor-1 levels in patients with diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH) Rheumatology International. 2006 Feb 13;26(4):292–7. doi: 10.1007/s00296-005-0588-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (11).Li H, Jiang LS, Dai LY. Hormones and growth factors in the pathogenesis of spinal ligament ossification. Eur Spine J. 2007 Aug;16(8):1075–84. doi: 10.1007/s00586-007-0356-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (12).Westerveld LA, Verlaan JJ, Lam MGEH, Scholten WP, Bleys RLAW, Dhert WJA, et al. The influence of diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis on bone mineral density measurements of the spine. Rheumatology. 2009 Sep 1;48(9):1133–6. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kep177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (13).Eser P, Bonel H, Seitz M, Villiger PM, Aeberli D. Patients with diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis do not have increased peripheral bone mineral density and geometry. Rheumatology. 2010 May 1;49(5):977–81. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keq014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (14).Diederichs G, Engelken F, Marshall L, Peters K, Black D, Issever A, et al. Diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH): relation to vertebral fractures and bone density. Osteoporosis International. 2011 Jun 1;22(6):1789–97. doi: 10.1007/s00198-010-1409-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (15).Weinfeld RM, Olson PN, Maki DD, Griffiths HJ. The prevalence of diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH) in two large American Midwest metropolitan hospital populations. Skeletal Radiology. 1997 Apr 16;26(4):222–5. doi: 10.1007/s002560050225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (16).Muntean L, Rojas-Vargas M, Font P, Simon SP, Rednic S, Schiotis R, et al. Relative value of the lumbar spine and hip bone mineral density and bone turnover markers in men with ankylosing spondylitis. Clin Rheumatol. 2011 May;30(5):691–5. doi: 10.1007/s10067-010-1648-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (17).Donnelly S, Doyle DV, Denton A, Rolfe I, McCloskey EV, Spector TD. Bone mineral density and vertebral compression fracture rates in ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis. 1994 Feb;53(2):117–21. doi: 10.1136/ard.53.2.117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (18).Bessant R, Keat A. How should clinicians manage osteoporosis in ankylosing spondylitis? J Rheumatol. 2002 Jul;29(7):1511–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (19).Scane AC, Masud T, Johnson FJ, Francis RM. The reliability of diagnosing osteoporosis from spinal radiographs. Age Ageing. 1994 Jul;23(4):283–6. doi: 10.1093/ageing/23.4.283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (20).Lewiecki EM, Laster AJ. Clinical review: Clinical applications of vertebral fracture assessment by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006 Nov;91(11):4215–22. doi: 10.1210/jc.2006-1178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (21).Orwoll ES, Oviatt SK, Mann T. The impact of osteophytic and vascular calcifications on vertebral mineral density measurements in men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1990 Apr;70(4):1202–7. doi: 10.1210/jcem-70-4-1202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (22).Reid IR, Evans MC, Ames R, Wattie DJ. The influence of osteophytes and aortic calcification on spinal mineral density in postmenopausal women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1991 Jun;72(6):1372–4. doi: 10.1210/jcem-72-6-1372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (23).Wang TK, Bolland MJ, Pelt NC, Horne AM, Mason BH, Ames RW, et al. Relationships between vascular calcification, calcium metabolism, bone density, and fractures. J Bone Miner Res. 2010;25(12):2777–85. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (24).Yildiz M, Canatan D. Soft tissue density variations in thalassemia major: a possible pitfall in lumbar bone mineral density measurements by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2005 Dec;22(8):723–6. doi: 10.1080/08880010500278707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (25).Spencer RP, Szigeti DP. Abdominal abscess detected by lumbar bone densitometry examination. Clin Nucl Med. 1998 Jan;23(1):44. doi: 10.1097/00003072-199801000-00016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (26).Smith JA, Spencer RP, Szigeti DP. Gall stones detected on lumbar bone densitometry examination. J Clin Densitom. 1998;1(4):403–4. doi: 10.1385/jcd:1:4:403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (27).Bazzocchi A, Ferrari F, Diano D, Albisinni U, Battista G, Rossi C, et al. Incidental Findings with Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry: Spectrum of Possible Diagnoses. Calcified Tissue International. 2012 Aug 1;91(2):149–56. doi: 10.1007/s00223-012-9609-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (28).Hauache OM, Vieira JG, Alonso G, Martins LR, Brandao C. Increased hip bone mineral density in a woman with gluteal silicon implant. J Clin Densitom. 2000;3(4):391–3. doi: 10.1385/jcd:3:4:391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (29).Spencer RP, Szigeti DP, Engin IO. Effect of laminectomy on measured bone density. J Clin Densitom. 1998;1(4):375–7. doi: 10.1385/jcd:1:4:375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (30).Cooper C, Harvey NC, Dennison EM, van Staa TP. Update on the epidemiology of Paget’s disease of bone. J Bone Miner Res. 2006 Dec;21(Suppl 2):3–8. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.06s201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (31).Dell’Atti C, Cassar-Pullicino VN, Lalam RK, Tins BJ, Tyrrell PN. The spine in Paget’s disease. Skeletal Radiol. 2007 Jul;36(7):609–26. doi: 10.1007/s00256-006-0270-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (32).Evans CE, Ward C, Braidman IP. Breast carcinomas synthesize factors which influence osteoblast-like cells independently of osteoclasts in vitro. J Endocrinol. 1991 Feb;128(2):R5–R8. doi: 10.1677/joe.0.128r005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (33).Narvaez JA, Narvaez J, Clavaguera MT, Juanola X, Valls C, Fiter J. Bone and skeletal muscle metastases from gastric adenocarcinoma: unusual radiographic, CT and scintigraphic features. Eur Radiol. 1998;8(8):1366–9. doi: 10.1007/s003300050554. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (34).Stabler J. Case report: ossifying metastases from carcinoma of the large bowel demonstrated by bone scintigraphy. Clin Radiol. 1995 Oct;50(10):730–1. doi: 10.1016/s0009-9260(05)83324-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (35).George J, Lai FM. Metastatic cervical carcinoma presenting as psoas abscess and osteoblastic and lytic bony metastases. Singapore Med J. 1995 Apr;36(2):224–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (36).Sherazi Z, Saifuddin A, Shaikh MI, Natali C, Pringle JA. Unusual imaging findings in association with spinal osteoblastoma. Clin Radiol. 1996 Sep;51(9):644–8. doi: 10.1016/s0009-9260(96)80060-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (37).Mohan V, Sabri T, Gupta RP, Das DK. Solitary ivory vertebra due to primary Ewing’s sarcoma. Pediatr Radiol. 1992;22(5):388–90. doi: 10.1007/BF02016267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (38).Epstein BS. The spine: a radiographic text and atlas. 4th ed. Lea & Febiger; Philadelphia, Pa: 1976. [Google Scholar]
  • (39).Lecuyer N, Grados F, Dargent-Molina P, Deramond H, Meunier PJ, Fardellone P. Prevalence of Paget’s disease of bone and spinal hemangioma in French women older than 75 years: data from the EPIDOS study. Joint Bone Spine. 2000;67(4):315–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (40).Resnick D. Diagnosis of bone and joint disorders. 4th ed. Saunders; Philadelphia, Pa: 2002. [Google Scholar]
  • (41).Sharma LM, Biswas G, Rai SS, Nair R, Gupta S, Parikh PM. Retro-peritoneal plasmacytoma: a case report and review of literature. Indian J Cancer. 2004 Jul;41(3):133–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (42).Hagiwara N, Yahikozawa H. Multiple cavernous haemangioma showing marked calcification on cranial radiography. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. 2002 Mar 1;72(3):410. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.72.3.410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (43).Cagavi F, Kalayci M, Tekin IO, Numanoglu G, Cagavi Z, Gul S, et al. Primary spinal extranodal Hodgkin’s disease at two levels. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2006 Feb;108(2):168–73. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2004.11.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (44).Correale J, Monteverde DA, Bueri JA, Reich EG. Peripheral nervous system and spinal cord involvement in lymphoma. Acta Neurol Scand. 1991 Jan;83(1):45–51. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.1991.tb03957.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (45).Mitchell MJ, Logan PM. Radiation-induced changes in bone. Radiographics. 1998 Sep;18(5):1125–36. doi: 10.1148/radiographics.18.5.9747611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (46).Umeoka S, Koyama T, Miki Y, Akai M, Tsutsui K, Togashi K. Pictorial review of tuberous sclerosis in various organs. Radiographics. 2008 Nov;28(7):e32. doi: 10.1148/rg.e32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (47).Jonard P, Lonneux M, Boland B, Malghem J, Jamar F. Tc-99m HDP bone scan showing bone changes in a case of tuberous sclerosis or Bourneville’s disease. Clin Nucl Med. 2001 Jan;26(1):50–2. doi: 10.1097/00003072-200101000-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (48).Crino PB, Nathanson KL, Henske EP. The Tuberous Sclerosis Complex. New England Journal of Medicine. 2006 Sep 28;355(13):1345–56. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra055323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (49).Takigawa T, Tanaka M, Nakanishi K, Misawa H, Sugimoto Y, Takahata T, et al. SAPHO syndrome associated spondylitis. Eur Spine J. 2008 Oct;17(10):1391–7. doi: 10.1007/s00586-008-0722-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (50).Laredo JD, Vuillemin-Bodaghi V, Boutry N, Cotten A, Parlier-Cuau C. SAPHO syndrome: MR appearance of vertebral involvement. Radiology. 2007 Mar;242(3):825–31. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2423051222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (51).Wang Y, Yin Y, Gilula LA, Wilson AJ. Endemic fluorosis of the skeleton: radiographic features in 127 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994 Jan;162(1):93–8. doi: 10.2214/ajr.162.1.8273699. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (52).Hallanger Johnson JE, Kearns AE, Doran PM, Khoo TK, Wermers RA. Fluoride-related bone disease associated with habitual tea consumption. Mayo Clin Proc. 2007 Jun;82(6):719–24. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (53).Whyte MP, Totty WG, Lim VT, Whitford GM. Skeletal fluorosis from instant tea. J Bone Miner Res. 2008 May;23(5):759–69. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.080101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (54).Joshi S, Hlaing T, Whitford GM, Compston JE. Skeletal fluorosis due to excessive tea and toothpaste consumption. Osteoporos Int. 2010 Oct 9; doi: 10.1007/s00198-010-1428-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (55).Kurland ES, Schulman RC, Zerwekh JE, Reinus WR, Dempster DW, Whyte MP. Recovery from skeletal fluorosis (an enigmatic, American case) J Bone Miner Res. 2007 Jan;22(1):163–70. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.060912. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (56).Riggs BL, Hodgson SF, O’Fallon WM, Chao EY, Wahner HW, Muhs JM, et al. Effect of fluoride treatment on the fracture rate in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. N Engl J Med. 1990 Mar 22;322(12):802–9. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199003223221203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (57).Kleerekoper M, Peterson EL, Nelson DA, Phillips E, Schork MA, Tilley BC, et al. A randomized trial of sodium fluoride as a treatment for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int. 1991 Jun;1(3):155–61. doi: 10.1007/BF01625446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (58).Wittenberg A. The rugger jersey spine sign. Radiology. 2004 Feb;230(2):491–2. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2302020388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (59).Jevtic V. Imaging of renal osteodystrophy. Eur J Radiol. 2003 May;46(2):85–95. doi: 10.1016/s0720-048x(03)00072-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (60).Kotzmann H, Bernecker P, Hubsch P, Pietschmann P, Woloszczuk W, Svoboda T, et al. Bone mineral density and parameters of bone metabolism in patients with acromegaly. J Bone Miner Res. 1993 Apr;8(4):459–65. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.5650080410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (61).Diamond T, Nery L, Posen S. Spinal and peripheral bone mineral densities in acromegaly: the effects of excess growth hormone and hypogonadism. Ann Intern Med. 1989 Oct 1;111(7):567–73. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-111-7-567. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (62).Kaji H, Sugimoto T, Nakaoka D, Okimura Y, Kaji H, Abe H, et al. Bone metabolism and body composition in Japanese patients with active acromegaly. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2001 Aug;55(2):175–81. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2265.2001.01280.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (63).Biermasz NR, Hamdy NA, Pereira AM, Romijn JA, Roelfsema F. Long-term maintenance of the anabolic effects of GH on the skeleton in successfully treated patients with acromegaly. Eur J Endocrinol. 2005 Jan;152(1):53–60. doi: 10.1530/eje.1.01820. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (64).Beyer HS, Anderson Q, Shih MS, Parfitt AM, Heath H., III Diffuse osteosclerosis in intravenous drug abusers. Am J Med. 1993 Dec;95(6):660–2. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(93)90364-u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (65).Beyer HS, Parfitt AM, Shih MS, Anderson Q, Heath H., III Idiopathic acquired diffuse osteosclerosis in a young woman. J Bone Miner Res. 1990 Dec;5(12):1257–63. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.5650051211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (66).Diamond T, Depczynski B. Acquired osteosclerosis associated with intravenous drug use and hepatitis C infection. Bone. 1996 Dec;19(6):679–83. doi: 10.1016/s8756-3282(96)00304-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (67).Fiore CE, Riccobene S, Mangiafico R, Santoro F, Pennisi P. Hepatitis C-associated osteosclerosis (HCAO): report of a new case with involvement of the OPG/RANKL system. Osteoporos Int. 2005 Dec;16(12):2180–4. doi: 10.1007/s00198-005-1858-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (68).Hassoun AA, Nippoldt TB, Tiegs RD, Khosla S. Hepatitis C-associated osteosclerosis: an unusual syndrome of acquired osteosclerosis in adults. Am J Med. 1997 Jul;103(1):70–3. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(97)00139-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (69).Khosla S, Hassoun AA, Baker BK, Liu F, Zein NN, Whyte MP, et al. Insulin-like growth factor system abnormalities in hepatitis C-associated osteosclerosis. Potential insights into increasing bone mass in adults. J Clin Invest. 1998 May 15;101(10):2165–73. doi: 10.1172/JCI1111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (70).Manganelli P, Giuliani N, Fietta P, Mancini C, Lazzaretti M, Pollini A, et al. OPG/RANKL system imbalance in a case of hepatitis C-associated osteosclerosis: the pathogenetic key? Clin Rheumatol. 2005 Jun;24(3):296–300. doi: 10.1007/s10067-004-1031-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (71).Schwartz KM, Skinner JA. Hepatitis C-associated osteosclerosis: a case report. Skeletal Radiol. 2008 Jul;37(7):679–81. doi: 10.1007/s00256-008-0471-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (72).Shaker JL, Reinus WR, Whyte MP. Hepatitis C-associated osteosclerosis: late onset after blood transfusion in an elderly woman. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1998 Jan;83(1):93–8. doi: 10.1210/jcem.83.1.4521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (73).Tanaka T, Oki S, Muro S, Tanaka K, Hashimoto J. A case of hepatitis C-associated osteosclerosis in an elderly Japanese man. Endocr J. 2006 Jun;53(3):393–9. doi: 10.1507/endocrj.k04-131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (74).Villareal DT, Murphy WA, Teitelbaum SL, Arens MQ, Whyte MP. Painful diffuse osteosclerosis after intravenous drug abuse. Am J Med. 1992 Oct;93(4):371–81. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(92)90165-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (75).Wakitani S, Hattori T, Nakaya H, Chae YM, Murata N, Tanigami A. Clinical images: Hepatitis C-associated osteosclerosis. Arthritis Rheum. 2003 Jan;48(1):268. doi: 10.1002/art.10770. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (76).Whyte MP, Reasner CA. Hepatitis C-associated osteosclerosis after blood transfusion. Am J Med. 1997 Feb;102(2):219–20. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(97)89507-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (77).Whyte MP. Paget’s disease of bone and genetic disorders of RANKL/OPG/RANK/NF-kappaB signaling. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006 Apr;1068:143–64. doi: 10.1196/annals.1346.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (78).Bergman D, Einhorn TI, Forster G. Stone bone syndrome--diffuse sclerosis of bone: a newly described clinical disorder. Endocr Pract. 1996 Jul;2(4):296. doi: 10.4158/EP.2.4.296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (79).Whyte MP, Teitelbaum SL, Reinus WR. Doubling skeletal mass during adult life: the syndrome of diffuse osteosclerosis after intravenous drug abuse. J Bone Miner Res. 1996 Apr;11(4):554–8. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.5650110417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (80).Qiu Q, Yan X, Bell M, Di J, Tsang BK, Gruslin A. Mature IGF-II prevents the formation of “big” IGF-II/IGFBP-2 complex in the human circulation. Growth Hormone & IGF Research. 2010 Apr;20(2):110–7. doi: 10.1016/j.ghir.2009.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (81).Javier R, de Vernejoul M, Afif N, Habersetzer F, Kuntz J, Sibilia J. Recovery from Hepatitis C-associated Osteosclerosis (HCAO) following anti-viral treatment. J Bone Miner.Res. 23 pp. s1-s620[pp. s1-s620], F488. 12-9-2008. [Google Scholar]
  • (82).Rollison DE, Howlader N, Smith MT, Strom SS, Merritt WD, Ries LA, et al. Epidemiology of myelodysplastic syndromes and chronic myeloproliferative disorders in the United States, 2001-2004, using data from the NAACCR and SEER programs. Blood. 2008 Jul 1;112(1):45–52. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-01-134858. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (83).Diamond T, Smith A, Schnier R, Manoharan A. Syndrome of myelofibrosis and osteosclerosis: a series of case reports and review of the literature. Bone. 2002 Mar;30(3):498–501. doi: 10.1016/s8756-3282(01)00695-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (84).Barete S, Assous N, de GC, Grandpeix C, Feger F, Palmerini F, et al. Systemic mastocytosis and bone involvement in a cohort of 75 patients. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010 Jun 22; doi: 10.1136/ard.2009.124511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (85).Johansson C, Roupe G, Lindstedt G, Mellstrom D. Bone density, bone markers and bone radiological features in mastocytosis. Age Ageing. 1996 Jan;25(1):1–7. doi: 10.1093/ageing/25.1.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (86).Kushnir-Sukhov NM, Brittain E, Reynolds JC, Akin C, Metcalfe DD. Elevated tryptase levels are associated with greater bone density in a cohort of patients with mastocytosis. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2006;139(3):265–70. doi: 10.1159/000091172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (87).Rossini M, Zanotti R, Bonadonna P, Artuso A, Caruso B, Schena D, et al. Bone mineral density, bone turnover markers and fractures in patients with indolent systemic mastocytosis. Bone. 2011 Oct;49(4):880–5. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2011.07.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (88).Chiappetta N, Gruber B. The Role of Mast Cells in Osteoporosis. Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism. 2006 Aug;36(1):32–6. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2006.03.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (89).Kushnir-Sukhov NM, Brittain E, Scott L, Metcalfe DD. Clinical correlates of blood serotonin levels in patients with mastocytosis. Eur J Clin Invest. 2008 Dec;38(12):953–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2362.2008.02047.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (90).Vedi S, Purdie DW, Ballard P, Bord S, Cooper AC, Compston JE. Bone remodeling and structure in postmenopausal women treated with long-term, high-dose estrogen therapy. Osteoporos Int. 1999;10(1):52–8. doi: 10.1007/s001980050194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (91).International nomenclature and classification of the osteochondrodysplasias Am J Med Genet. 1997;1998;79(5):376–82. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1096-8628(19981012)79:5<376::aid-ajmg9>3.0.co;2-h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (92).Tolar J, Teitelbaum SL, Orchard PJ. Osteopetrosis. N Engl J Med. 2004 Dec 30;351(27):2839–49. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra040952. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (93).Albers-Schönberg HE. Röntgenbilder einer seltenen Knockenerkrankung. Munch Med Wochenschr. 1903;5:365–8. [Google Scholar]
  • (94).Van HE, Gram J, Bollerslev J, Van WL, Mathysen D, Andersen PE, et al. Localization of the gene causing autosomal dominant osteopetrosis type I to chromosome 11q12-13. J Bone Miner Res. 2002 Jun;17(6):1111–7. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.2002.17.6.1111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (95).Van HW, Bollerslev J, Gram J, Van HE, Wuyts W, Benichou O, et al. Localization of a gene for autosomal dominant osteopetrosis (Albers-Schonberg disease) to chromosome 1p21. Am J Hum Genet. 1997 Aug;61(2):363–9. doi: 10.1086/514844. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (96).Bollerslev J. Osteopetrosis. A genetic and epidemiological study. Clin Genet. 1987 Feb;31(2):86–90. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (97).Salzano FM. Osteopetrosis: review of dominant cases and frequency in a Brazilian state. Acta Genet Med Gemellol (Roma) 1961 Jul;10:353–8. doi: 10.1017/s1120962300016954. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (98).Whyte MP. Sclerosing Bone Disorders. In: Rosen CJ, editor. Primer on the Metabolic Bone Diseases and Disorders of Mineral Metabolism. 7th ed. American Society for Bone and Mineral Research, The Sheridan Press; Washington, USA: 2008. pp. 412–23. [Google Scholar]
  • (99).Benichou O, Cleiren E, Gram J, Bollerslev J, de Vernejoul MC, Van HW. Mapping of autosomal dominant osteopetrosis type II (Albers-Schonberg disease) to chromosome 16p13.3. Am J Hum Genet. 2001 Sep;69(3):647–54. doi: 10.1086/323132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (100).Bollerslev J, Mosekilde L. Autosomal dominant osteopetrosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993 Sep;(294):45–51. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (101).Waguespack SG, Hui SL, DiMeglio LA, Econs MJ. Autosomal Dominant Osteopetrosis: Clinical Severity and Natural History of 94 Subjects with a Chloride Channel 7 Gene Mutation. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007 Mar 1;92(3):771–8. doi: 10.1210/jc.2006-1986. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (102).Benichou OD, Laredo JD, de Vernejoul MC. Type II autosomal dominant osteopetrosis (Albers-Schonberg disease): clinical and radiological manifestations in 42 patients. Bone. 2000 Jan 1;26(1):87–93. doi: 10.1016/s8756-3282(99)00244-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (103).Benichou OD, Benichou B, Copin H, de Vernejoul MC, Van HW. Further evidence for genetic heterogeneity within type II autosomal dominant osteopetrosis. J Bone Miner Res. 2000 Oct;15(10):1900–4. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.2000.15.10.1900. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (104).Kornak U, Kasper D, Bosl MR, Kaiser E, Schweizer M, Schulz A, et al. Loss of the ClC-7 chloride channel leads to osteopetrosis in mice and man. Cell. 2001 Jan 26;104(2):205–15. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(01)00206-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (105).Zhang ZL, He JW, Zhang H, Hu WW, Fu WZ, Gu JM, et al. Identification of the CLCN7 gene mutations in two Chinese families with autosomal dominant osteopetrosis (type II) Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism. 2009 Jul 1;27(4):444–51. doi: 10.1007/s00774-009-0051-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (106).Pangrazio A, Pusch M, Caldana E, Frattini A, Lanino E, Tamhankar PM, et al. Molecular and clinical heterogeneity in CLCN7-dependent osteopetrosis: report of 20 novel mutations. Human Mutation. 2010;31(1):E1071–E1080. doi: 10.1002/humu.21167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (107).Waguespack SG, Koller DL, White KE, Fishburn T, Carn G, Buckwalter KA, et al. Chloride Channel 7 (ClCN7) Gene Mutations and Autosomal Dominant Osteopetrosis, Type II. J Bone Miner Res. 2003;18(8):1513–8. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.2003.18.8.1513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (108).Maroteaux P, Lamy M. La Pycnodysostose. Presse Med. 1962;70:999–1002. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (109).Maroteaux P, Lamy M. The Malady of Toulouse-Lautrec. JAMA. 1965;191:715–7. doi: 10.1001/jama.1965.03080090029007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (110).Bartsocas CS. Pycnodysostosis: Toulouse-Lautrec’s and Aesop’s disease? Hormones (Athens) 2002 Oct;1(4):260–2. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (111).Gelb BD, Shi GP, Chapman HA, Desnick RJ. Pycnodysostosis, a lysosomal disease caused by cathepsin K deficiency. Science. 1996;273:1236–8. doi: 10.1126/science.273.5279.1236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (112).Donnarumma M, Regis S, Tappino B, Rosano C, Assereto S, Corsolini F, et al. Molecular Analysis and Characterization of Nine Novel CTSK Mutations in Twelve Patients Affected by Pycnodysostosis. Mutation in brief# 961. Online. Human Mutation. 2007;28:524. doi: 10.1002/humu.9490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (113).Fujita Y, Nakata K, Yasui N, Matsui Y, Kataoka E, Hiroshima K, et al. Novel Mutations of the Cathepsin K Gene in Patients with Pycnodysostosis and Their Characterization. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000;85:425–31. doi: 10.1210/jcem.85.1.6247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (114).Motyckova G, Fisher DE. Pycnodysostosis: role and regulation of cathepsin K in osteoclast function and human disease. Curr Mol Med. 2002 Aug;2(5):407–21. doi: 10.2174/1566524023362401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (115).Muto T, Michiya H, Taira H, Murase H, Kanazawa M. Pycnodysostosis. Report of a case and review of the Japanese literature, with emphasis on oral and maxillofacial findings. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1991 Oct;72(4):449–55. doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(91)90559-u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (116).Eisman JA, Bone HG, Hosking DJ, McClung MR, Reid IR, Rizzoli R, et al. Odanacatib in the treatment of postmenopausal women with low bone mineral density: Three-year continued therapy and resolution of effect. J Bone Miner Res. 2011;26(2):242–51. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (117).Staehling-Hampton K, Proll S, Paeper BW, Zhao L, Charmley P, Brown A, et al. A 52-kb deletion in the SOST-MEOX1 intergenic region on 17q12-q21 is associated with van Buchem disease in the Dutch population. Am J Med Genet. 2002 Jun 15;110(2):144–52. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.10401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (118).van Oers RF, Van RB, Ito K, Hilbers PA, Huiskes R. A sclerostin-based theory for strain-induced bone formation. Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2011 Oct;10(5):663–70. doi: 10.1007/s10237-010-0264-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (119).Padhi D, Jang G, Stouch B, Fang L, Posvar E. Single-dose, placebo-controlled, randomized study of AMG 785, a sclerostin monoclonal antibody. J Bone Miner Res. 2011;26(1):19–26. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (120).Lewiecki EM. Sclerostin monoclonal antibody therapy with AMG 785: a potential treatment for osteoporosis. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2010 Nov 29;11(1):117–27. doi: 10.1517/14712598.2011.540565. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (121).Hamersma H, Gardner J, Beighton P. The natural history of sclerosteosis. Clinical Genetics. 2003;63(3):192–7. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-0004.2003.00036.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (122).Stephen LX, Hamersma H, Gardner J, Beighton P. Dental and oral manifestations of sclerosteosis. Int Dent J. 2001 Aug;51(4):287–90. doi: 10.1002/j.1875-595x.2001.tb00840.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (123).Balemans W, Van Den Ende J, Freire Paes-Alves A, Dikkers FG, Willems PJ, Vanhoenacker F, et al. Localization of the gene for sclerosteosis to the van Buchem disease-gene region on chromosome 17q12-q21. Am J Hum Genet. 1999;64(6):1661–9. doi: 10.1086/302416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (124).Tacconi P, Ferrigno P, Cocco L, Carinas A, Tamburini G, Bergonzi P, et al. Sclerosteosis: report of a case in a black African man. Clinical Genetics. 1998;53(6):497–501. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.1998.tb02603.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (125).Van Hul W, Balemans W, Van Hul E, Dikkers FG, Obee H, Stokroos RJ, et al. Van Buchem disease (hyperostosis corticalis generalisata) maps to chromosome 17q12-q21. Am J Hum Genet. 1998;62(2):391–9. doi: 10.1086/301721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (126).van Lierop AH, Hamdy NA, Papapoulos SE. Glucocorticoids are not always deleterious for bone. J Bone Miner Res. 2010;25(12):2520–4. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (127).Johnson ML, Gong G, Kimberling W, Recker SM, Kimmel DB, Recker RB. Linkage of a gene causing high bone mass to human chromosome 11 (11q12-13) Am J Hum Genet. 1997;60(6):1326–32. doi: 10.1086/515470. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (128).Little RD, Carulli JP, Del Mastro RG, Dupuis J, Osborne M, Folz C, et al. A mutation in the LDL receptor-related protein 5 gene results in the autosomal dominant high-bone-mass trait. Am J Hum Genet. 2002;70(1):11–9. doi: 10.1086/338450. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (129).Boyden LM, Mao J, Belsky J, Mitzner L, Farhi A, Mitnick MA, et al. High bone density due to a mutation in LDL-receptor-related protein 5. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(20):1513–21. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa013444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (130).Whyte MP, Reinus WH, Mumm S. High-bone mass disease and LRP5. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:2096–9. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200405133502017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (131).Boyden LMIK, Lifton RP. High Bone Mass Disease and LRP5. New Engl J Med. 2004;350(20):2098–9. [Google Scholar]
  • (132).Kwee ML, Balemans W, Cleiren E, Gille JJ, Van Der Blij F, Sepers JM, et al. An autosomal dominant high bone mass phenotype in association with craniosynostosis in an extended family is caused by an LRP5 missense mutation. J Bone Miner Res. 2005 Jul;20(7):1254–60. doi: 10.1359/JBMR.050303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (133).Renton T, Odell E, Drage NA. Differential diagnosis and treatment of autosomal dominant osteosclerosis of the mandible. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2002;40(1):55–9. doi: 10.1054/bjom.2001.0719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (134).Bollerslev J, Nielsen HK, Larsen HF, Mosekilde L. Biochemical evidence of disturbed bone metabolism and calcium homeostasis in two types of autosomal dominant osteopetrosis. Acta Med Scand. 1988;224(5):479–83. doi: 10.1111/j.0954-6820.1988.tb19614.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (135).Bollerslev J, Andersen PE., Jr. Radiological, biochemical and hereditary evidence of two types of autosomal dominant osteopetrosis. Bone. 1988;9(1):7–13. doi: 10.1016/8756-3282(88)90021-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (136).Van WL, Cleiren E, Gram J, Beals RK, Benichou O, Scopelliti D, et al. Six novel missense mutations in the LDL receptor-related protein 5 (LRP5) gene in different conditions with an increased bone density. Am J Hum Genet. 2003 Mar;72(3):763–71. doi: 10.1086/368277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (137).Beals RK. Endosteal hyperostosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1976;58(8):1172–3. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (138).Beals RK, McLoughlin SW, Teed RL, McDonald C. Dominant endosteal hyperostosis. Skeletal characteristics and review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83-A(11):1643–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (139).Scopelliti D, Orsini R, Ventucci E, Carratelli D. Van Buchem disease. Maxillofacial changes, diagnostic classification and general principles of treatment. Minerva Stomatol. 1999;48(5):227–34. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (140).van Wesenbeeck L, Odgren PR, Mackay CA, Van Hul W. Localization of the gene causing the osteopetrotic phenotype in the incisors absent (ia) rat on chromosome 10q32.1. J Bone Miner Res. 2004;19(2):183–9. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.2004.19.2.183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (141).Balemans W, Devogelaer JP, Cleiren E, Piters E, Caussin E, Van Hul W. Novel LRP5 missense mutation in a patient with a high bone mass phenotype results in decreased DKK1-mediated inhibition of Wnt signaling. J Bone Miner Res. 2007;22(5):708–16. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.070211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (142).Rickels MR, Zhang X, Mumm S, Whyte MP. Oropharyngeal skeletal disease accompanying high bone mass and novel LRP5 mutation. J Bone Miner Res. 2005 May;20(5):878–85. doi: 10.1359/JBMR.041223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (143).Little RD, Carulli JP, Del Mastro RG, Dupuis J, Osborne M, Folz C, et al. A mutation in the LDL receptor-related protein 5 gene results in the autosomal dominant high-bone-mass trait. Am J Hum Genet. 2002;70(1):11–9. doi: 10.1086/338450. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (144).Koay A, Brown MA. Genetic disorders of the LRP5-Wnt signalling pathway affecting the skeleton. Trends in Molecuar Medicine. 2005;11:129–37. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2005.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (145).Gong Y, Slee RB, Fukai N, Rawadi G, Roman-Roman S, Reginato AM, et al. LDL receptor-related protein 5 (LRP5) affects bone accrual and eye development. Cell. 2001;107:513–23. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(01)00571-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (146).Gregson CL, Sayers A, Lazar V, Steel S, Dennison EM, Cooper C, et al. The high bone mass phenotype is characterised by a combined cortical and trabecular bone phenotype: Findings from a pQCT case–control study. Bone. 2012;51(1):380–8. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2012.10.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (147).Gregson CL, Paggiosi M, Crabtree N, Steel S, McCloskey E, Duncan EL, et al. Analysis of body composition in individuals with high bone mass reveals a marked increase in fat mass in women but not men. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 2012 doi: 10.1210/jc.2012-3342. in press. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (148).Frost M, Andersen T, Gossiel F, Hansen S, Bollerslev J, Van Hul W, et al. Levels of serotonin, sclerostin, bone turnover markers as well as bone density and microarchitecture in patients with high bone mass phenotype due to a mutation in Lrp5. J Bone Miner Res. 2011;26(8):1721–8. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.376. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (149).Hart DJ, Mootoosamy I, Doyle DV, Spector TD. The relationship between osteoarthritis and osteoporosis in the general population: the Chingford Study. Ann Rheum Dis. 1994 Mar;53(3):158–62. doi: 10.1136/ard.53.3.158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (150).Nevitt MC, Lane NE, Scott JC, Hochberg MC, Pressman AR, Genant HK, et al. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group Radiographic osteoarthritis of the hip and bone mineral density. Arthritis Rheum. 1995 Jul;38(7):907–16. doi: 10.1002/art.1780380706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (151).Hart DJ, Cronin C, Daniels M, Worthy T, Doyle DV, Spector TD. The relationship of bone density and fracture to incident and progressive radiographic osteoarthritis of the knee: the Chingford Study. Arthritis Rheum. 2002 Jan;46(1):92–9. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(200201)46:1<92::AID-ART10057>3.0.CO;2-#. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (152).Nevitt MC, Zhang Y, Javaid MK, Neogi T, Curtis JR, Niu J, et al. High systemic bone mineral density increases the risk of incident knee OA and joint space narrowing, but not radiographic progression of existing knee OA: the MOST study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010 Jan;69(1):163–8. doi: 10.1136/ard.2008.099531. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (153).Arden NK, Griffiths GO, Hart DJ, Doyle DV, Spector TD. The association between osteoarthritis and osteoporotic fracture: the Chingford Study. Br J Rheumatol. 1996 Dec;35(12):1299–304. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/35.12.1299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (154).Arden NK, Nevitt MC, Lane NE, Gore LR, Hochberg MC, Scott JC, et al. Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group Osteoarthritis and risk of falls, rates of bone loss, and osteoporotic fractures. Arthritis Rheum. 1999 Jul;42(7):1378–85. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(199907)42:7<1378::AID-ANR11>3.0.CO;2-I. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (155).Radin EL, Paul IL, Rose RM. Role of mechanical factors in pathogenesis of primary osteoarthritis. Lancet. 1972 Mar 4;1(7749):519–22. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(72)90179-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (156).Luyten FP, Tylzanowski P, Lories RJ. Wnt signaling and osteoarthritis. Bone. 2009 Apr;44(4):522–7. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2008.12.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (157).Zhu M, Tang D, Wu Q, Hao S, Chen M, Xie C, et al. Activation of beta-catenin signaling in articular chondrocytes leads to osteoarthritis-like phenotype in adult beta-catenin conditional activation mice. J Bone Miner Res. 2009 Jan;24(1):12–21. doi: 10.1359/JBMR.080901. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (158).Suri S, Walsh DA. Osteochondral alterations in osteoarthritis. Bone. 2012 Aug;51(2):204–11. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2011.10.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (159).Lories RJ, Luyten FP. The bone-cartilage unit in osteoarthritis. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2011 Jan;7(1):43–9. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2010.197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (160).Hardcastle SA, Gregson CL, Deere K, Davey-Smith G, Dieppe P, Tobias JH. Prevalence of joint replacement is increased in high bone mass; Bone Research Society/National Osteoporosis Society annual meeting; Manchester. 2012.Jul, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  • (161).Ralston SH, Langston AL, Reid IR. Pathogenesis and management of Paget’s disease of bone. Lancet. 2008 Jul 12;372(9633):155–63. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61035-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (162).Balemans W, Van WL, Van HW. A clinical and molecular overview of the human osteopetroses. Calcif Tissue Int. 2005 Nov;77(5):263–74. doi: 10.1007/s00223-005-0027-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (163).Sobacchi C, Frattini A, Guerrini MM, Abinun M, Pangrazio A, Susani L, et al. Osteoclast-poor human osteopetrosis due to mutations in the gene encoding RANKL. Nat Genet. 2007 Aug;39(8):960–2. doi: 10.1038/ng2076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (164).Segovia-Silvestre T, Neutzsky-Wulff A, Sorensen M, Christiansen C, Bollerslev J, Karsdal M, et al. Advances in osteoclast biology resulting from the study of osteopetrotic mutations. Human Genetics. 2009 Jan 1;124(6):561–77. doi: 10.1007/s00439-008-0583-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (165).Del FA, Fornari R, Van WL, de FF, Timmermans JP, Peruzzi B, et al. A new heterozygous mutation (R714C) of the osteopetrosis gene, pleckstrin homolog domain containing family M (with run domain) member 1 (PLEKHM1), impairs vesicular acidification and increases TRACP secretion in osteoclasts. J Bone Miner Res. 2008 Mar;23(3):380–91. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.071107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (166).Malinin NL, Zhang L, Choi J, Ciocea A, Razorenova O, Ma YQ, et al. A point mutation in KINDLIN3 ablates activation of three integrin subfamilies in humans. Nat Med. 2009 Mar;15(3):313–8. doi: 10.1038/nm.1917. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (167).Pasvolsky R, Feigelson SW, Kilic SS, Simon AJ, Tal-Lapidot G, Grabovsky V, et al. A LAD-III syndrome is associated with defective expression of the Rap-1 activator CalDAG-GEFI in lymphocytes, neutrophils, and platelets. J Exp Med. 2007 Jul 9;204(7):1571–82. doi: 10.1084/jem.20070058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (168).Hellemans J, Preobrazhenska O, Willaert A, Debeer P, Verdonk PC, Costa T, et al. Loss-of-function mutations in LEMD3 result in osteopoikilosis, Buschke-Ollendorff syndrome and melorheostosis. Nat Genet. 2004 Nov;36(11):1213–8. doi: 10.1038/ng1453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (169).Freyschmidt J. Melorheostosis: a review of 23 cases. Eur Radiol. 2001;11(3):474–9. doi: 10.1007/s003300000562. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (170).Jenkins ZA, van Kogelenberg M, Morgan T, Jeffs A, Fukuzawa R, Pearl E, et al. Germline mutations in WTX cause a sclerosing skeletal dysplasia but do not predispose to tumorigenesis. Nat Genet. 2009 Jan;41(1):95–100. doi: 10.1038/ng.270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (171).Whyte MP, Hughes AE. Expansile skeletal hyperphosphatasia is caused by a 15-base pair tandem duplication in TNFRSF11A encoding RANK and is allelic to familial expansile osteolysis. J Bone Miner Res. 2002;17(1):26–9. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.2002.17.1.26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (172).Nakatsuka K, Nishizawa Y, Ralston SH. Phenotypic characterization of early onset Paget’s disease of bone caused by a 27-bp duplication in the TNFRSF11A gene. J Bone Miner Res. 2003 Aug;18(8):1381–5. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.2003.18.8.1381. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (173).Whyte MP, Murphy WA, Siegel BA. 99 mTc-pyrophosphate bone imaging in osteopoikilosis, osteopathia striata, and melorheostosis. Radiology. 1978 May;127(2):439–43. doi: 10.1148/127.2.439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (174).Gass JK, Hellemans J, Mortier G, Griffiths M, Burrows NP. Buschke-Ollendorff syndrome: a manifestation of a heterozygous nonsense mutation in the LEMD3 gene. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2008 May;58(5 Suppl 1):S103–S104. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2007.03.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (175).Goltz RW, Peterson WC, Gorlin RJ, Ravits HG. Focal Dermal Hypoplasia. Arch Dermatol. 1962 Dec 1;86(6):708–17. doi: 10.1001/archderm.1962.01590120006002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (176).Goltz RW. Focal Dermal Hypoplasia Syndrome: An Update. Arch Dermatol. 1992 Aug 1;128(8):1108–11. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (177).Wang X, Reid Sutton V, Omar Peraza-Llanes J, Yu Z, Rosetta R, Kou YC, et al. Mutations in X-linked PORCN, a putative regulator of Wnt signaling, cause focal dermal hypoplasia. Nat Genet. 2007 Jul;39(7):836–8. doi: 10.1038/ng2057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (178).Hansen H. In: Handbuch der Kinderheilkunde. Opitz H, Schmid F, editors. Springer; Berlin: 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • (179).Brunkow ME, Gardner JC, Van Ness J, Paeper BW, Kovacevich BR, Proll S, et al. Bone Dysplasia Sclerosteosis Results from Loss of the SOST Gene Product, a Novel Cystine Knot-Containing Protein. The American Journal of Human Genetics. 2001 Mar;68(3):577–89. doi: 10.1086/318811. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (180).Van Buchem FS, Hadders H, Ubbens R. An uncommon familial systemic disease of the skeleton: hyperostosis corticalis generalisata familiaris. Acta radiol. 1955 Aug;44(2):109–20. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (181).Fosmoe RJ, Holm RS, Hildreth RC. Van Buchem’s disease (hyperostosis corticalis generalisata familiaris). A case report. Radiology. 1968 Apr;90(4):771–4. doi: 10.1148/90.4.771. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (182).Leupin O, Piters E, Halleux C, Hu S, Kramer I, Morvan F, et al. Bone Overgrowth-associated Mutations in the LRP4 Gene Impair Sclerostin Facilitator Function. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2011 Jun 3;286(22):19489–500. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.190330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (183).Nurnberg P, Tinschert S, Mrug M, Hampe J, Muller CR, Fuhrmann E, et al. The Gene for Autosomal Dominant Craniometaphyseal Dysplasia Maps to Chromosome 5p and Is Distinct from the Growth Hormone-Receptor Gene. The American Journal of Human Genetics. 1997 Oct;61(4):918–23. doi: 10.1086/514880. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (184).Reichenberger E, Tiziani V, Watanabe S, Park L, Ueki Y, Santanna C, et al. Autosomal Dominant Craniometaphyseal Dysplasia Is Caused by Mutations in the Transmembrane Protein ANK. The American Journal of Human Genetics. 2001 Jun;68(6):1321–6. doi: 10.1086/320612. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (185).Kinoshita A, Saito T, Tomita H, Makita Y, Yoshida K, Ghadami M, et al. Domain-specific mutations in TGFB1 result in Camurati-Engelmann disease. Nat Genet. 2000 Sep;26(1):19–20. doi: 10.1038/79128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (186).Campos-Xavier A, Saraiva J, Savarirayan R, Verloes A, Feingold J, Faivre L, et al. Phenotypic variability at the TGF-B1 locus in Camurati-Engelmann disease. Human Genetics. 2001 Dec 1;109(6):653–8. doi: 10.1007/s00439-001-0644-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (187).Smith R, Walton R, Corner BD, Gordon I. Clinical and Biochemical Studies in Engelmann’s Disease (Progressive Diaphyseal Dysplasia) QJM. 1977 Apr 1;46(2):273–94. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (188).Crisp AJ, Brenton DP. Engelmann’s disease of bone--a systemic disorder? Ann Rheum Dis. 1982 Apr;41(2):183–8. doi: 10.1136/ard.41.2.183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (189).Saito T, Kinoshita A, Yoshiura Ki, Makita Y, Wakui K, Honke K, et al. Domain-specific Mutations of a Transforming Growth Factor (TGF)-B1 Latency-associated Peptide Cause Camurati-Engelmann Disease Because of the Formation of a Constitutively Active Form of TGFB1. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2001 Apr 13;276(15):11469–72. doi: 10.1074/jbc.C000859200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (190).McGowan NWA, MacPherson H, Janssens K, Van Hul W, Frith JC, Fraser WD, et al. A Mutation Affecting the Latency-Associated Peptide of TGFB1 in Camurati-Engelmann Disease Enhances Osteoclast Formation in Vitro. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 2003 Jul 1;88(7):3321–6. doi: 10.1210/jc.2002-020564. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (191).Ghosal SP, Mukherjee AK, Mukherjee D, Ghosh AK. Diaphyseal dysplasia associated with anemia. J Pediatr. 1988 Jul;113(1 Pt 1):49–57. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(88)80527-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (192).Genevieve D, Proulle V, Isidor B, Bellais S, Serre V, Djouadi F, et al. Thromboxane synthase mutations in an increased bone density disorder (Ghosal syndrome) Nat Genet. 2008 Mar;40(3):284–6. doi: 10.1038/ng.2007.66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (193).Garcia-Garcia AS, Martinez-Gonzalez JM, Gomez-Font R, Soto-Rivadeneira A, Oviedo-Roldan L. Current status of the torus palatinus and torus mandibularis. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2010 Mar;15(2):e353–e360. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (194).Adami S, Supronik J, Hala T, Brown J, Gamero P, Haemmerle S, et al. Effect of one year treatment with the cathepsin-K inhibitor, balicatib, on bone mineral density (BMD) in postmenopausal women with osteopenia/osteoporosis. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. 2006;21(Suppl 1):S24. [Google Scholar]
  • (195).Peroni A, Zini A, Braga V, Colato C, Adami S, Girolomoni G. Drug-induced morphea: Report of a case induced by balicatib and review of the literature. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 2008 Jul;59(1):125–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2008.03.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (196).Kulkarni NH, Onyia JE, Zeng Q, Tian X, Liu M, Halladay DL, et al. Orally Bioavailable GSK-3α/β Dual Inhibitor Increases Markers of Cellular Differentiation In Vitro and Bone Mass In Vivo. J Bone Miner Res. 2006;21(6):910–20. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.060316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (197).Glantschnig H, Hampton R, Wei N, Scott K, Nantermet P, Zhao J, et al. Fully Human anti-DKK1 Antibodies Increase Bone Formation and Resolve Osteopenia in Mouse Models of Estrogen-Deficiency Induced Bone Loss. J Bone Miner Res. 2008;23:S60–S61. [Google Scholar]
  • (198).Heiland GR, Zwerina K, Baum W, Kireva T, Distler JH, Grisanti M, et al. Neutralisation of Dkk-1 protects from systemic bone loss during inflammation and reduces sclerostin expression. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. 2010 Dec 1;69(12):2152–9. doi: 10.1136/ard.2010.132852. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (199).Moore WJ, Kern JC, Bhat R, Commons TJ, Fukayama S, Goljer I, et al. Modulation of Wnt Signaling Through Inhibition of Secreted Frizzled-Related Protein I (sFRP-1) with N-Substituted Piperidinyl Diphenylsulfonyl Sulfonamides. J Med Chem. 2008 Dec 12;52(1):105–16. doi: 10.1021/jm801144h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES