Abstract
Autism affects males more than females, giving rise to the idea that the influence of steroid hormones on early fetal brain development may be one important early biological risk factor. Utilizing the Danish Historic Birth Cohort and Danish Psychiatric Central Register, we identified all amniotic fluid samples of males born between 1993-1999 who later received ICD-10 diagnoses of autism, Asperger Syndrome, or PDD-NOS (n=128) compared to matched typically developing controls. Concentration levels of Δ4 sex steroids (progesterone, 17α-hydroxy-progesterone, androstenedione, and testosterone) and cortisol were measured with liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. All hormones were positively associated with each other and principal components analysis confirmed that one generalized latent steroidogenic factor was driving much of the variation in the data. The autism group showed elevations across all hormones on this latent generalized steroidogenic factor (Cohen’s d = 0.37, p = 0.0009) and this elevation was uniform across ICD-10 diagnostic label. These results provide the first direct evidence of elevated fetal steroidogenic activity in autism. Such elevations may be important as epigenetic fetal programming mechanisms and may interact with other important pathophysiological factors in autism.
Keywords: autism, fetal development, steroid hormones
Autism is characterized by early developmental difficulties in social interaction and communication, alongside highly repetitive stereotyped behavior and/or restricted interests. It affects approximately 1% of the population, and males are diagnosed more often than females1. Whilst changing diagnostic practice over time and other social variables likely partly contribute to this male bias, biological factors related to the sex chromosomes and/or fetal sex steroids may also play important roles2, 3. Given their capacity to exert epigenetic fetal programming influence during early critical periods of brain development4-7, steroid hormones are well-positioned as an important early fetal environmental factor that may interact with other risk factors for autism and other atypical neurodevelopmental conditions that asymmetrically affect the sexes2, 8-11.
Prior work has shown that one prominent sex steroid, testosterone, has wide-ranging influence on phenotypic variability related to autism. For example, fetal testosterone influences individual differences in typical development in eye contact, vocabulary size, restricted interests, mentalizing, empathy, systemizing, attention to detail, and autistic traits11. Emerging neuroimaging evidence also supports a role for fetal testosterone affecting individual differences in structural and functional brain development in directions congruent with patterns of sexual dimorphism, and in brain regions known to develop atypically in autism and other sex-biased developmental psychopathological conditions2, 9, 12. The ‘extreme male brain’ (EMB) theory of autism3, which is primarily an account about the cognitive phenotype of autism, makes mechanistic predictions about the role of elevated fetal sex steroids such as testosterone in the development of autism. However, the EMB theory does not exclude the role of other mechanisms such as the role of sex chromosome effects or the role of other steroid hormones proximal to testosterone in biosynthesis pathways (e.g., estradiol, progesterone, cortisol). Therefore, although prior work in relation to autism has mainly tested fetal testosterone, it may be that the actions of testosterone and other precursor steroid hormones within the same biosynthesis pathway (e.g., the Δ4 sex steroid pathway) all play significant roles during fetal development in autism. For example, prior genetic association evidence has found a role for Cytochrome P450 containing enzymes in autism (e.g., CYP17A1, CYP19A1, CYP11B1)13. These enzymes are critical for the conversion of different hormones along the Δ4 pathway that lead up to testosterone (e.g., progesterone, 17α-hydroxy-progesterone, androstenedione) as well as for conversion of Δ4 steroids such as progesterone and 17α-hydroxy-progesterone towards cortisol (see Supplementary Figure 1). Thus, in this study we test the role of not only fetal testosterone, but also precursor steroids within the Δ4 pathway, as well as the non-Δ4 steroid hormone cortisol, as potential mechanisms that are elevated during fetal development in autism.
However, given the 1% prevalence rate, previous studies have been too small to obtain a sample size large enough to test the hypothesis of whether fetal steroid activity is elevated in those who later receive a clinical diagnosis of autism. In the present study we overcome this limitation by examining a large biobank of amniocentesis samples from the Danish Historic Birth Cohort (HBC), archived at the Statens Serum Institute (SSI) in Copenhagen, Denmark. The HBC has stored amniocentesis, bloodspots, and maternal serum samples from the Danish population since the late 1970’s and includes more than 100,000 samples. Using samples of individuals born between 1993-1999, we linked samples in the HBC to the Danish Psychiatric Central Register (DPCR) to identify all amniotic fluid samples of individuals who went on to later receive an ICD-10 diagnosis of childhood autism, Asperger Syndrome, or PDD-NOS. We measured concentration levels of sex steroids along the CYP17-mediated Δ4 sex steroid biosynthesis pathway (i.e. progesterone, 17α-hydroxy-progesterone, androstenedione, and testosterone). We also measured the glucocorticoid steroid hormone cortisol, because it is well known as a fetal programming mechanism associated with a number of atypical phenotypes such as anxiety disorder and attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)10 that commonly co-occur with autism14. Cortisol is also positively correlated to sex steroid levels such as testosterone in both amniotic fluid and fetal plasma15, 16, but its position outside the Δ4 sex steroid pathway (see Supplementary Figure 1) allows for testing neuroendocrine specificity of any potentially atypical fetal steroidogenic activity in autism. Given prior work2, 3, we predicted there would be elevated levels of steroidogenic activity across all subgroups on the autism spectrum and across all Δ4 sex steroid hormones, but predicted no difference in cortisol levels.
Methods and Materials
Participants
Participants were selected from a population of singleton births between the years 1993-1999 (n = 19,677) whose amniotic fluid samples were stored within the HBC17. Our study is restricted to individuals born between 1993-1999 because quality control analyses on typically developing Control individuals born between 1982-1992 showed marked signs of changes in concentration levels compared to individuals born between 1993-1999 that are likely due to evaporation and a systematic change in the caps used for sealing the tubes that begun in 1993 (see Supplement). Within November 2009 to January 2010, we searched the HBC and DPCR and identified all cases with an ICD-10 diagnosis of Pervasive Developmental Disorder codes (F84.0: childhood autism; F84.5: Asperger Syndrome; F84.1: atypical autism; F84.8: other pervasive developmental disorders; F84.9: pervasive developmental disorder, unspecified). After data-quality filtering was applied (see Figure 1) the number of total female autism cases was small (n=24) and preliminary analysis of non-hormonal variables indicated female autism cases had significantly older fathers at birth (autism mean = 37.45 years, SD = 7.20; Control mean = 34.50 years, SD = 5.52; t(81) = 2.01, p = 0.04) and weighed less than Controls (autism mean = 3142.8 grams, SD = 490.73; Control mean = 3404.4 grams, SD = 557.41; t(81) = 2.00, p = 0.04). Such problems were not apparent for male autism cases and thus all analyses were conducted on males only. Typically developing Controls came from randomly selected sample of individuals from the HBC with no known neuropsychiatric diagnoses. The final sample sizes in all analyses are n=217 Controls and n=128 autism. Amongst the autism group, individuals comprised the following ICD-10 sub-diagnoses: n=41 F84.0: childhood autism; n=29 F84.5: Asperger Syndrome; n=4 F84.1: atypical autism; n=15 F84.8: other pervasive developmental disorders; n=39 F84.9: pervasive developmental disorder, unspecified. However, all analyses treated autism as one group rather than splitting amongst sub-diagnostic labels.
Figure 1. Flowchart depicting population, selection criteria, and stratification into samples used for final analyses.
This flowchart shows the original population sizes within the HBC and the population from which our study was drawn from (individuals born between 1993 and 1999). Red boxes indicate steps where data selected or excluded.
Abbreviations: HBC, Historic Birth Cohort; AS, Asperger Syndrome; PDD-NOS, pervasive developmental disorder not otherwise specified; MR, mental retardation.
Sample Storage and Hormone Assays
Amniotic fluid samples in the HBC were centrifuged immediately after collection and the supernatants were kept at −20°C, following the routine procedure for storing and handling biologic materials at the SSI18. Hormone assays took place at the beginning of 2010 and consisted of liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) of concentration levels of progesterone, 17alpha-hydroxyprogesterone, androstenedione, testosterone, and cortisol. We computed a variable for ‘storage time’ based on the difference between time at which the assays were done and an individual’s year of birth. We tested the 4 steroid hormones in the Δ4 sex steroid pathway (progesterone, 17α-hydroxy-progesterone, androstenedione, and testosterone), plus cortisol as a steroid hormone outside the Δ4-pathway (see Supplementary Figure 1). All calibrators, controls, internal standards and μ-titer plates were purchased from Perkin Elmer via their CHS steroid profiling kit for mass spectrometry (Perkin Elmer, Waltham Massachusetts). Formic acid was purchased from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). Ammonium acetate and Zink sulphate heptahydrate were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St Louis, Missouri). Water was purified using a Millipore water purification unit (Millipore, Billerica, Massachusetts).
The LC-MS/MS system consisted of an Aria TLX2 system (Thermo, Waltham Massachusetts) with two Agilent 1100 binary pumps and two Agilent 1200 quaternary pumps (Agilent, Santa Clara California) connected to a Thermo TSQ Ultra triple quarupole mass spectrometer equipped with an APCI ion source. Extraction was performed using a Cyclone P 0.5 × 50 mm Turboflow column (Thermo) and analytical separation was achieved using Kinetix 2.6 μ 2.1 × 50 mm C18 columns (Phenomenex, Torrance, California). The following solvents were used loading buffer A 5% Methanol 95% water containing 0.1% formic acid (LA), loading buffer B 100% methanol containing 10 mmol/L ammonium acetate (LB), eluting buffer A 2% methanol 98% water (EA), eluting buffer B (EB) was identical to LB. The analytes were trapped on the turboflow extraction column using 100 LA at a flow rate of 1.5 mL/min. After 60 seconds the analytes were transferred to the analytical column using 100 μL of LB at a flow rate of 0.15 mL/min for a duration of 60 seconds. The transferred analytes were concurrently diluted using 60% EA 40 % EB at a flow rate of 0.3 mL/min. Subsequently, the analytes were separated prior to MS analysis using gradient elution from 53 % EA 47% EB to 35.5 EA 64.5 % EB at a flow rate of 0.4 mL/min.
The MS system was operated in positive mode using APCI. The following source settings were used: discharge current 5, vaporizer temp 450, sheath gas pressure 25, ion sweep gas pressure 0, aux gas pressure 25, Capillary temperature 300 and collision pressure 1.5. Collision voltages and T-lens voltages were optimized for each transition. For the analytes the following transitions were used: progesterone [315.1/97,315.1/109], 17-alpha-hydroxy-progesterone [331.1/97, 331.1/109], androstenedione [287.1/97, 287.1/109], testosterone [289.1/97, 289.1/109], and cortisol [363.1/97, 363.2/121]. For the internal standards the following transitions were used: progesterone-d9 [324.2/100, 324.2/113], 17-alpha-hydroxy-progesterone-d8 [339.2/100, 339.2/113], androstenedioned5 [292.2/100, 292.2/113], and testosterone d5 [294.2.1/100, 294.2/113], Cortisol-d3 [366.3/97, 366.3/121].
Calibrators and controls were reconstituted with water according to the kit insert. A deproteinising solution (DPS) consisting of 18g/L zink sulphate heptahydrate in 80% methanol 20% water containing internal standard was prepared. 50 μL of amniotic fluid samples, calibrators and controls were pipetted onto a 98 well μ-titer plate. 100 μL of DBS was added to precipitate proteins from the samples. The plate was sealed with a silicone plate map and was incubated at −20 C for 4 hours. The plate was centrifuged at 4000 rpm and the supernatant was transferred to a new μ-titer plate. The plate was covered with aluminum sealing foil and was placed in the autosampler prior analysis.
Statistical Analysis
Before data analysis we first implemented data quality selection criteria. We excluded all individuals where duplicate assays resulted in a difference greater than 3 standard deviations from the entire sample. We also excluded outliers whose concentration levels were greater than the 99th percentile defined based on the entire sample born between 1993-1999. These outliers were determined to be primarily artifactual in origin, given that testosterone concentrations for these outliers were far above the maximum concentration values ever observed in prior studies of fetal testosterone either in our or independent laboratories11, 16. Given that changes in sample concentration due to storage-related factors are well known issues19 (see Supplement), the exclusion of such extreme outliers helped guard against this artifactual influence.
To investigate associations between hormones in each group we computed the correlation matrices estimated via robust regression in order to allow for insensitivity to bivariate outlying data points. We also ran principal components analysis (PCA) implemented with pca.m in Matlab R2012B after preprocessing the dataset via z-scoring. PCA was conducted to inspect the latent structure of the dataset and to confirm that one latent variable related to generalized steroidogenic activity was driving a large proportion of the variance in the dataset. After running PCA, we ran our main hypothesis tests as one-way ANOVAs on the PCA scores (5 ANOVAs; one per component) and evaluated the results at a Bonferroni-corrected alpha level of p<0.01. To check that maternal age, paternal age, birth weight, gestational age at amniocentesis, and storage time did not contribute confounding influences on the hypothesis tests, we re-ran hypothesis tests as ANCOVAs with these variables included as covariates.
At a descriptive level of analysis we next assessed the patterning of the group differences along the first principle component across all hormones and all ICD-10 autism sub-diagnoses. To achieve this we reconstructed the data in its original space by multiplying the first principal component’s scores with its loading coefficients (i.e. matrix multiplication of the first PC’s scores against the transposed vector of the first PC’s loading coefficients) and then reversed the z-scoring process in order to have the data back on its original scale. Once this was done we used bar graphs to plot the mean and standard error (+/− 1 standard error of the mean) for all hormones separately and all ICD-10 subgroups separately. No further statistical tests were done at this point and this process is merely for descriptive purposes, to illustrate how each hormone and ICD-10 subgroup contribute to the differences within the first principal component.
While we view the hypothesis tests on the PCA scores as a more parsimonious approach to the dataset, we also ran hypothesis tests on the raw data to verify whether similar inferences would remain without having PCA transform the data along latent variables. Here we implemented a MANOVA on raw hormone concentration levels and re-ran the analysis again after including maternal age, paternal age, birth weight, gestational age at amniocentesis, and storage time as covariates.
Results
Ninety-five percent or more of individuals from each group had APGAR scores greater than 6 at 5 minutes after birth, indicating that almost all participants in this study were classified as healthy at birth. Non-hormonal variables of interest such as maternal and paternal age, birth weight, and gestational age at amniocentesis did not differ between-groups. Furthermore, ruling out storage time as a possible confound, we found that groups did not differ in terms how long samples were kept in storage (see Table 1). Demonstrating that these factors do not differ on average between-groups is important given that many have prior links to autism, as well as their general importance as health-related fetal programming influences. However, although there were no significant between-group differences on any of these variables, we continued to view these variables as covariates in further analyses.
Table 1. Sample Characteristics.
Means and standard deviations (in parentheses) are given for each group along with the F-statistic and p-value from an ANOVA testing for between-group differences
| Group Variable | Controls (n=217) | Childhood Autism (F84.0; n=41) |
Asperger Syndrome (F84.5; n=29) |
PDD-NOS (F84.1, F84.8, F84.9; n=58) |
ANOVA F(3,341) | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maternal Age (years) | 33.59 (5.03) | 34.12 (5.89) | 33.52 (5.34) | 32.32 (6.15) | 1.11 | 0.34 |
| Paternal Age (years) | 35.59 (6.53) | 37.29 (7.21) | 33.69 (6.06) | 35.03 (8.13) | 1.48 | 0.21 |
| Birth Weight (grams) | 3529.45 (662.01) | 3659.75 (802.10) | 3432.41 (622.77) | 3446.63 (543.06) | 0.93 | 0.42 |
| Gestational Age at Sampling (weeks) | 14.94 (1.95) | 15.02 (1.33) | 15.41 (1.74) | 15.06 (1.71) | 0.56 | 0.63 |
| APGAR (% of sample w/score < 6) | 99% | 95% | 100% | 100% | - | - |
| Storage Time (years) | 14.78 (1.64) | 14.63 (1.84) | 14.41 (1.80) | 14.84 (1.63) | 0.54 | 0.65 |
Given the close proximity between the measured hormones within steroidogenic biosynthesis pathways and prior work suggesting positive relationships between steroid hormones such as testosterone and cortisol in fetal development15, 16, we examined relationships between all measured hormones. Irrespective of group membership, concentration levels of all hormones were positively related (Figure 2A-B). This suggests one underlying latent ‘steroidogenic’ factor driving concentration levels in the amniotic fluid. Quantitative confirmation of this hypothesis can be seen in the results of a principal components analysis (PCA), which revealed one prominent component explaining 49.47% of the variance in the data, and all 5 hormones loaded relatively equally onto it. The other 4 components explained substantially smaller amounts of variance (<17%) and loaded predominantly onto two or three hormones (Figure 2C-D). A scree plot of the eigenvalues (Figure 2D) shows an ‘elbow’ at component 2 and eigenvalues are all below 1 for components 2-5. Given that PCA allowed for parsimonious unsupervised separation of various sources of variation in the dataset, we went ahead with main tests of our hypotheses based on the PCA scores for each component.
Figure 2. Associations between steroid hormones and latent steroidogenic factors.
Panels A-B show correlation matrices depicting the relationships between all hormones measured in the study for the typically developing Control group (panel A) and the autism group (panel B). Panel C shows the PCA loading coefficients for each hormone on each component. Panel D shows a scree plot of the eigenvalues for each component and the percentage of variation each component explains. Error bars in panel D represent the 95% bias-corrected and accelerated bootstrap confidence intervals for the eigenvalues estimated from 10,000 bootstrap resamples.
Abbreviations: P: progesterone; 17αHP: 17α-hydroxy-progesterone; A: androstenedione; T: testosterone; C: cortisol; PCA: principal component analysis; PC: principal component
One-way ANOVAs on the PCA scores for each component (coding all individuals with autism the same irrespective of their ICD-10 subgroup) revealed that only the first principal component, reflecting a latent generalized steroidogenic factor, was significantly different between-groups (F(1,343) = 11.18, p = 0.000915, Cohen’s d = 0.37), and this was driven by elevations in the autism group (Figure 3A). No other components revealed any between-group differences (PC2: F(1,343) = 0.025, p = 0.87, Cohen’s d = −0.01; PC3: F(1,343) = 0.73, p = 0.39, Cohen’s d = −0.09; PC4: F(1,343) = 0.42, p = 0.51, Cohen’s d = 0.07; PC5: F(1,343) = 0.30, p = 0.58, Cohen’s d = 0.06). Including other non-hormonal variables such as paternal age, maternal age, birth weight, gestational age at time of amniocentesis, and storage time as covariates did not change any of the inferences (PC1: F(1,334) = 11.01, p = 0.001; PC2: F(1,334) = 0.27, p = 0.59; PC3: F(1,334) = 0.79, p = 0.37; PC4: F(1,334) = 0.70, p = 0.40; PC5: F(1,334) = 0.18, p = 0.67). Furthermore, similar inferences are obtained using a MANOVA on raw concentration levels (Wilk’s Λ = 0.964, p = 0.029) and when including non-hormonal covariates (Wilk’s Λ = 0.962, p = 0.023) (see Table 2 for descriptive statistics on the raw concentration levels).
Figure 3. Group differences in amniotic fluid hormone concentration levels across each group.
PCA scores for each component are shown in panel A. The mean is shown as a black dot, and the errorbars represent the 95% confidence intervals. Underneath the mean and errorbars are dots for each individual in the sample (Controls, pink; Autism, light blue). The star (*) indicates a group-difference (passing the Bonferroni-corrected alpha of p<0.01) in the first principal component (Cohen’s d = 0.37, p = 0.0009), where scores are elevated in autism compared to Controls. Panels B-F plot the hormone concentrations after the data is reconstructed from the first principal component scores and loadings. These bar graphs enable viewing of the patterns across each hormone and across each ICD-10 autism subgroup, in order to describe what contributes to the group differences in the latent steroidogenic factor represented by the first principal component. In these plots, the mean is shown as a black dot and the errorbars represent the 95% confidence intervals. Underneath the mean and errorbars are dots for each individual in the sample (Controls, pink; PDD-NOS, green, Asperger Syndrome, light blue, Childhood Autism, purple).
Abbreviations: PCA, principal component analysis; PC: principal component; AS, Asperger Syndrome; PDD-NOS, pervasive developmental disorder not otherwise specified.
Table 2. Descriptive statistics for each hormone and each group.
Mean and standard deviation values are in units of nmol/L.
| Control (n=217) | All Autism (F84.0, F84.1, F84.5, F84.8, F84.9; n=128) |
Childhood Autism (F84.0; n=41) |
Asperger Syndrome (F84.5; n=29) |
PDD-NOS (F84.1, F84.8, F84.9; n=58) |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Progesterone | 49.2085 (26.7755) | 59.2323 (33.3872) | 65.0100 (33.8850) | 60.6800 (37.0477) | 54.4243 (30.9040) |
| 17α-hydroxy-progesterone | 1.5056 (0.5494) | 1.6853 (0.5988) | 1.6722 (0.5246) | 1.7059 (0.5331) | 1.6843 (0.6826) |
| Androstenedione | 0.9701 (0.4793) | 1.1223 (0.7282) | 1.0590 (0.4866) | 1.0310 (0.3673) | 1.2128 (0.9662) |
| Testosterone | 0.7850 (0.3681) | 0.8523 (0.4009) | 0.8224 (0.4080) | 0.9590 (0.4568) | 0.8202 (0.3625) |
| Cortisol | 0.3384 (0.1748) | 0.3739 (0.2115) | 0.3637 (0.1564) | 0.3272 (0.1245) | 0.4050 (0.2721) |
We next went further into describing the nature of differences in the ‘steroidogenic’ component by reconstructing the data in its original space from the coefficients and scores from the first principal component. This reconstruction allowed us to descriptively visualize the patterns of data from this steroidogenic component for each hormone separately, as well as for each ICD-10 defined autism subgroup. Elevations are prominent across all hormones, and similar irrespective of ICD-10 autism subgroup (Figure 3B-F).
Discussion
This is the first study to directly test the prediction that fetal steroidogenic activity is elevated in autism. We find that amniotic fluid steroid hormones are elevated in those who later received diagnoses on the autism spectrum. Rather than the abnormality being restricted to a specific steroid hormone, a latent steroidogenic factor is elevated, which includes all hormones in the Δ4-pathway, as well as cortisol. This observation suggests dysregulation of pathways mediated by Cytochrome P450 containing enzymes that catalyze the conversion of hormones along the Δ4 and glucocorticoid pathways. Prior evidence pointing towards the importance of such enzymes was previously found via genetic associations between autism and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in CYP17A1, CYP19A1, and CYP11B1 genes13.
The source of elevated steroidogenic activity in the fetal development of autism was not tested in the current study, and more research will be needed to understand how different sources such as the fetus, mother, placenta, or other environmental factors might contribute to such elevations. While there are robust sex differences in amniotic fluid testosterone (see meta-analysis in Supplementary Table 2 as well as documented sex differences in typically developing Controls in this cohort in Supplementary Figure 7) that suggest that the fetus is a primary source20, some research has documented correlations between amniotic fluid levels and maternal plasma that would suggest that maternal-placental-fetal transfer is another possible source16, 21, 22. Recent work also suggests the placenta is capable of synthesizing sex steroids de novo from maternal substrates (cholesterol), maternal or fetal prohormones, and steroid precursors23. Active steroids produced in the placental unit can be released into both the maternal and fetal compartments to maintain the pregnancy and fetal development24. In addition, endocrine disrupting compounds may be another source of environmentally-mediated influence on the early fetal hormonal environment and autism25. Each of these sources requires further investigation to determine how such influences might affect fetal development in autism.
Fetal steroidogenic abnormalities in autism are also important because of their known interactions with other findings in the early development of autism. Steroids and their receptors act as epigenetic fetal programming influences on early brain development. Through their nuclear hormone receptors, steroids can alter gene expression via direct or indirect influence on multiple epigenetic processes such as histone acetylation, DNA methylation, and have transcriptional and post-transcriptional effects on noncoding mRNAs such as microRNAs. Furthermore, during early sensitive periods of brain development there are sex differences in DNA methylation, methyl-binding proteins, chromatin modifications, and microRNA expression, and these effects are mediated in part by early steroid hormone effects4-6.
Early steroid-mediated epigenetic influence can also be observed via genomic or non-genomic influences on neurodevelopmental processes/mechanisms thought to be atypical in autism, such as neurogenesis, apoptosis, neurotransmission, and synapse formation/function, and the immune system26, 27, and may be important for understanding early pathophysiological mechanisms for autism2. For example, steroid receptors upregulate Wnt signaling through their action on β-catenin28, a molecule that plays a crucial role in cell-to-cell adhesion. Atypical cell-to-cell adhesion could potentially underlie minicolumnopathy29 and other abnormalities at the synapse in autism30. Interestingly, a prominent autism-candidate gene involved in synapse formation, NLGN4X, shows sex-biased differential exon usage that is particularly pronounced during fetal development31. Sex steroids also influence early developmental changes in GABAergic signaling32. Given known abnormalities in GABAergic signaling in autism, elevations in early fetal sex steroids may modulate GABAergic control of the excitatory/inhibitory balance in the developing autistic brain33, 34. Steroid hormones also interact with the immune system and a striking example of this is how early sex steroids influence sexual dimorphism in brain and behavior through their effects on microglia activation26. Many studies have observed a wide array of atypicalities in the immune system in autism35. Converging with the current results, we previously found atypical chemokine and cytokine profiles in both amniotic fluid and neonatal bloodspots of individuals with a diagnosis of autism in the HBC36-38. These arguments point to the need for further work investigating interactions between fetal programming effects of steroid hormones and other early pathophysiological mechanisms in autism.
The current results may also be relevant to the literature on prenatal stress and autism. We found that cortisol, a biomarker typically associated with stress, is elevated early in the fetal development of autism. Studies of prenatal stress in autism have been mixed and vary substantially in methodological detail39, 40. While the current results may suggest a link between prenatal stress and autism via heightened fetal cortisol, it is unclear if the association here is due to heightened prenatal stress or is driven by a more primary fetal sex steroid influence that has a side-effect of boosting fetal cortisol levels. Furthermore, although cortisol is a prominent stress hormone at later points in development, it may have different functions at earlier stages of brain development. As mentioned earlier, unlike in adulthood, cortisol and sex steroids such as testosterone are positively related to each other in fetal development15, 16 and this may suggest a more varied role for cortisol in early brain development. The current work is consistent with prior suggestions of interactions between the fetal hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) and hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal (HPG) axes, and their known fetal programming effects on later atypical neurodevelopmental phenotypes41.
From a clinical standpoint, the current results say nothing about the potential for such data as a prospective prenatal test of autism risk. The current findings are based on average-level group-differences that are useful for hypothesis testing but are not directly applicable for prediction of individual diagnoses. Further work examining the predictive utility of these and other fetal markers is necessary to evaluate their implications for clinical screening. Finally, the present results should not be used as empirical justification for treatments that target sex steroids. The androgen-blocker Lupron has already been inappropriately offered42 as a treatment for autism. Aside from the ethical and safety issues this type of treatment raises, there is little conceptual rationale to justify its use in autism since an elevation in steroidogenic activity in early (fetal) development has no direct implications for the use of androgen-blocking drugs later in life. ‘Organizational’ effects of sex steroids on early fetal brain development tend to create permanent, irreversible changes in how the brain is organized at the cellular level7, 27 and such treatments much later in life may be incapable of reversing such effects.
This study has certain limitations. First, data from central registries do not allow for collection of detailed information about clinical symptoms to validate diagnoses against gold-standard instruments. However, other studies have shown that within the DPCR the validity ratio for childhood autism cases is 94% for 1990-199943. Second, hormones were assayed from a historic collection of amniocentesis samples stored over several years at −20°C. Analyte concentration levels are known to change over time, especially when the time period stretches over 10 years19. However, for the cohort analyzed in this study (born between 1993-1999), storage-time-dependent changes are unlikely to be a major issue. For instance, groups did not systematically differ in storage time and inclusion of this and other key variables as covariates did not change any inferences. Furthermore, concentration levels of testosterone were in line with levels typically observed across the literature and robust sex differences in testosterone were apparent as was the known prenatal surge peaking around gestational weeks 14-16 (see Supplemental Figure 7). In addition, the use of PCA enabled unsupervised separation of various sources of variation in the data and highlighted the latent steroidogenic component. Even if variation due to storage-time-dependent changes affected the data from the first principal component of our analyses, there is no reason to suspect a bias towards inflating the concentration levels in one group relative to the other. Aside from PCA, a MANOVA on the raw concentration levels also revealed elevations in the autism group. This suggests that while some storage-time-dependent changes are unavoidable in historic collections, it did not prevent our ability to test the main hypothesis. Finally, the prevalence estimate of autism within this amniocentesis cohort (0.8%) is consistent with prevalence estimates of autism in the Danish population during the same time period44. Thus, although these results are derived from a selected sample, they may be representative of what would be expected in the general population. Nevertheless, future work on a sample more representative of the general population is necessary, as are tests of autism against other neurodevelopmental conditions that are asymmetrically affected across the sexes.
The current results provide initial support for a fetal steroid theory in explaining some aspects of early epigenetic risk for autism and/or other sex-biased neurodevelopmental conditions occurring during periods of fetal brain development. There are several promising directions for further testing this theory. Other steroid pathways (e.g., the Δ5-pathway, other glucocorticoids hormones), and particularly, estradiol, must be investigated in future work. Estradiol has long been known in non-human species to have potent masculinizing effects on brain and behavioral development45. In a prior study, we found genetic association evidence for autism in the CYP19A1 gene, which codes for the protein aromatase that converts testosterone to estradiol. Gene expression levels of an autism-associated gene, retinoic acid-related orphan receptor-alpha (RORA), are lowered by testosterone and elevated by estradiol, and transcriptionally regulates several autism-associated genes including CYP19A1, thus affected aromatase levels46, 47. Although we were unable to test estradiol in the current study due to lack of an automated LC-MS/MS assay, we intend to investigate this in future work.
It is also necessary for future work to test if such elevations are specific to autism or are shared by other neurodevelopmental conditions with skewed sex ratios, and to test whether similar elevations exist in females with autism. Given the co-morbidity of autism with other sex-biased conditions such as ADHD, anxiety disorder, and conduct disorder and associations between these conditions and prenatal stress14, 48, it may be that elevations in fetal steroid activity are not specific to autism. However, even if there is no specificity for elevations in autism, this would not necessarily detract from the significance of the results, as the elevations in autism may be more specific to the phenotype when observed in combination with other risk-factors for autism that steroid hormones abnormalities may interact with in early development. Finally, given the evidence for positive correlations between all Δ4 steroids and non-Δ4 steroid hormones such as cortisol in early fetal development, future work should investigate interactions between HPA and HPG axes in early brain development.
In conclusion, we report the first direct evidence that steroidogenic activity is elevated in fetal development of those who later receive diagnoses on the autism spectrum. These results raise new questions for understanding a wide array of other observations about the early development of autism, through their interactions with early fetal steroidogenic abnormalities and provide initial support for the importance of fetal steroid hormones as important epigenetic fetal programming mechanisms for autism.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
Funding/Support: This study was supported by a program grant from the Medical Research Council UK (MRC) awarded to SBC, project grants from Nancy Lurie Marks Family Foundation, Wellcome Trust, and the Autism Research Trust awarded to SBC, a fellowship from the British Academy and Jesus College, Cambridge awarded to MVL.
Role of the Sponsor: The funding organizations had no role in the design and conduct of the study; in the collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; or in the preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript.
Footnotes
Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None of the authors have any biomedical financial interests or potential conflicts of interest.
References
- 1.Baird G, Simonoff E, Pickles A, Chandler S, Loucas T, Meldrum D, et al. Prevalence of disorders of the autism spectrum in a population cohort of children in South Thames: the Special Needs and Autism Project (SNAP) Lancet. 2006;368(9531):210–215. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69041-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Baron-Cohen S, Lombardo MV, Auyeung B, Ashwin E, Chakrabarti B, Knickmeyer R. Why are autism spectrum conditions more prevalent in males? PLoS Biol. 2011;9(6):e1001081. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Baron-Cohen S. The extreme male brain theory of autism. Trends Cogn Sci. 2002;6(6):248–254. doi: 10.1016/s1364-6613(02)01904-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Jessen HM, Auger AP. Sex differences in epigenetic mechanisms may underlie risk and resilience for mental health disorders. Epigenetics. 2011;6(7):857–861. doi: 10.4161/epi.6.7.16517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Morgan CP, Bale TL. Sex differences in microRNA regulation of gene expression: no smoke, just miRs. Biol Sex Differ. 2012;3(1):22. doi: 10.1186/2042-6410-3-22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Nugent BM, McCarthy MM. Epigenetic underpinnings of developmental sex differences in the brain. Neuroendocrinology. 2011;93:150–158. doi: 10.1159/000325264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Phoenix CH, Goy RW, Gerall AA, Young WC. Organizing action of prenatally administered testosterone propionate on the tissues mediating mating behavior in the female guinea pig. Endocrinology. 1959;65:369–382. doi: 10.1210/endo-65-3-369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Geschwind N, Galaburda AM. Cerebral lateralization. Biological mechanisms, associations, and pathology: I. A hypothesis and a program for research. Arch Neurol. 1985;42(5):428–459. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1985.04060050026008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Lombardo MV, Ashwin E, Auyeung B, Chakrabarti B, Lai MC, Taylor K, et al. Fetal programming effects of testosterone on the reward system and behavioral approach tendencies in humans. Biol Psychiatry. 2012;72(10):839–847. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2012.05.027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Glover V. Annual Research Review: Prenatal stress and the origins of psychopathology: an evolutionary perspective. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2011;52(4):356–367. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2011.02371.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Auyeung B, Lombardo MV, Baron-Cohen S. Prenatal and postnatal hormone effects on the human brain and cognition. Pflugers Archiv : Eur J Physiol. 2013;465(5):557–571. doi: 10.1007/s00424-013-1268-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Lombardo MV, Ashwin E, Auyeung B, Chakrabarti B, Taylor K, Hackett G, et al. Fetal testosterone influences sexually dimorphic gray matter in the human brain. J Neurosci. 2012;32(2):674–680. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4389-11.2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Chakrabarti B, Dudbridge F, Kent L, Wheelwright S, Hill-Cawthorne G, Allison C, et al. Genes related to sex steroids, neural growth, and social-emotional behavior are associated with autistic traits, empathy, and Asperger syndrome. Autism Res. 2009;2(3):157–177. doi: 10.1002/aur.80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Simonoff E, Pickles A, Charman T, Chandler S, Loucas T, Baird G. Psychiatric disorders in children with autism spectrum disorders: prevalence, comorbidity, and associated factors in a population-derived sample. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2008;47(8):921–929. doi: 10.1097/CHI.0b013e318179964f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Gitau R, Adams D, Fisk NM, Glover V. Fetal plasma testosterone correlates positively with cortisol. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2005;90(2):F166–169. doi: 10.1136/adc.2004.049320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Sarkar P, Bergman K, Fisk NM, O’Connor TG, Glover V. Amniotic fluid testosterone: relationship with cortisol and gestational age. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2007;67(5):743–747. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2007.02955.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Abdallah MW, Greaves-Lord K, Grove J, Norgaard-Pedersen B, Hougaard DM, Mortensen EL. Psychiatric comorbidities in autism spectrum disorders: findings from a Danish Historic Birth Cohort. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2011 doi: 10.1007/s00787-011-0220-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Norgaard-Pedersen B, Hougaard DM. Storage policies and use of the Danish Newborn Screening Biobank. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2007;30(4):530–536. doi: 10.1007/s10545-007-0631-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kugler K, Hackl W, Mueller L, Fiegl H, Graber A, Pfeiffer R. The impact of sample storage time on estimates of association in biomarker discovery studies. J Clin Bioinforma. 2011;1(1):1–8. doi: 10.1186/2043-9113-1-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.van de Beek C, Thijssen JH, Cohen-Kettenis PT, van Goozen SH, Buitelaar JK. Relationships between sex hormones assessed in amniotic fluid, and maternal and umbilical cord serum: what is the best source of information to investigate the effects of fetal hormonal exposure? Horm Behav. 2004;46(5):663–669. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2004.06.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Glover V, Bergman K, Sarkar P, O’Connor TG. Association between maternal and amniotic fluid cortisol is moderated by maternal anxiety. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2009;34(3):430–435. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2008.10.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Sarkar P, Bergman K, Fisk NM, O’Connor TG, Glover V. Ontogeny of foetal exposure to maternal cortisol using midtrimester amniotic fluid as a biomarker. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2007;66(5):636–640. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2007.02785.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Escobar JC, Patel SS, Beshay VE, Suzuki T, Carr BR. The human placenta expresses CYP17 and generates androgens de novo. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96(5):1385–1392. doi: 10.1210/jc.2010-2504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Strauss JF, 3rd, Martinez F, Kiriakidou M. Placental steroid hormone synthesis: unique features and unanswered questions. Biol Reprod. 1996;54(2):303–311. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod54.2.303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Hertz-Picciotto I. Environmental risk factors in autism: Results from large-scale epidemiological studies. In: Amaral DG, Dawson G, Geschwind DH, editors. Autism Spectrum Disorders. Oxford University Press; New York: 2011. pp. 827–862. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Lenz KM, Nugent BM, Haliyur R, McCarthy MM. Microglia are essential to masculinization of brain and behavior. J Neuroscience. 2013;33(7):2761–2772. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1268-12.2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.McCarthy MM, Arnold AP. Reframing sexual differentiation of the brain. Nat Neurosci. 2011;14(6):677–683. doi: 10.1038/nn.2834. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Mulholland DJ, Dedhar S, Coetzee GA, Nelson CC. Interaction of nuclear receptors with the Wnt/beta-catenin/Tcf signaling axis: Wnt you like to know? Endocr Rev. 2005;26(7):898–915. doi: 10.1210/er.2003-0034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Williams EL, Casanova MF. Above genetics: Lessons from cerebral development in autism. Transl Neurosci. 2011;2:1–15. doi: 10.2478/s13380-011-0016-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Spooren W, Lindemann L, Ghosh A, Santarelli L. Synapse dysfunction in autism: a molecular medicine approach to drug discovery in neurodevelopmental disorders. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2012;33(12):669–684. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2012.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Kang HJ, Kawasawa YI, Cheng F, Zhu Y, Xu X, Li M, et al. Spatio-temporal transcriptome of the human brain. Nature. 2011;478(7370):483–489. doi: 10.1038/nature10523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.McCarthy MM, Auger AP, Perrot-Sinal TS. Getting excited about GABA and sex differences in the brain. Trends Neurosci. 2002;25(6):307–312. doi: 10.1016/s0166-2236(02)02182-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Rubenstein JL. Developmental neurobiology of autism spectrum disorders. In: Amaral DG, Dawson G, Geschwind DH, editors. Autism Spectrum Disorders. Oxford University Press; New York: 2011. pp. 527–538. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Warrier V, Baron-Cohen S, Chakrabarti B. Genetic variation in GABRB3 is associated with Asperger syndrome and multiple endophenotypes relevant to autism. Mol Autism. 2013;4(1):48. doi: 10.1186/2040-2392-4-48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Goines P, Van de Water J. The immune system’s role in the biology of autism. Curr Opin Neurol. 2010;23(2):111–117. doi: 10.1097/WCO.0b013e3283373514. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Abdallah MW, Larsen N, Grove J, Norgaard-Pedersen B, Thorsen P, Mortensen EL, et al. Amniotic fluid inflammatory cytokines: Potential markers of immunologic dysfunction in autism spectrum disorders. World J Biol Psychiatry. 2011 doi: 10.3109/15622975.2011.639803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Abdallah MW, Larsen N, Grove J, Nørgaard-Pedersen B, Thorsen P, Mortensen EL, et al. Amniotic fluid chemokines and autism spectrum disorders: An exploratory study utilizing a Danish Historic Birth Cohort. Brain Behav Immun. 2012;26(1):170–176. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2011.09.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Abdallah MW, Larsen N, Mortensen EL, Atladottir HO, Norgaard-Pedersen B, Bonefeld-Jorgensen EC, et al. Neonatal levels of cytokines and risk of autism spectrum disorders: An exploratory register-based historic birth cohort study utilizing the Danish Newborn Screening Biobank. J Neuroimmunol. 2012;252(1-2):75–82. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2012.07.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Kinney DK, Miller AM, Crowley DJ, Huang E, Gerber E. Autism prevalence following prenatal exposure to hurricanes and tropical storms in Louisiana. J Autism Dev Disord. 2008;38(3):481–488. doi: 10.1007/s10803-007-0414-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Li J, Vestergaard M, Obel C, Christensen J, Precht DH, Lu M, et al. A nationwide study on the risk of autism after prenatal stress exposure to maternal bereavement. Pediatrics. 2009;123(4):1102–1107. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-1734. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Sarkar P, Bergman K, O’Connor TG, Glover V. Maternal antenatal anxiety and amniotic fluid cortisol and testosterone: possible implications for foetal programming. J Neuroendocrinol. 2008;20(4):489–496. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2826.2008.01659.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Geier DA, Geier MR. A clinical trial of combined anti-androgen and anti-heavy metal therapy in autistic disorders. Neuroendocrinol Lett. 2006;27(6):833–838. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Lauritsen MB, Jorgensen M, Madsen KM, Lemcke S, Toft S, Grove J, et al. Validity of childhood autism in the Danish Psychiatric Central Register: findings from a cohort sample born 1990-1999. J Autism Dev Disord. 2010;40(2):139–148. doi: 10.1007/s10803-009-0818-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Parner ET, Schendel DE, Thorsen P. Autism prevalence trends over time in Denmark: changes in prevalence and age at diagnosis. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2008;162(12):1150–1156. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.162.12.1150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Wu MV, Manoli DS, Fraser EJ, Coats JK, Tollkuhn J, Honda SI, et al. Estrogen masculinizes neural pathways and sex-specific behaviors. Cell. 2009;139:61–72. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.07.036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Sarachana T, Xu M, Wu RC, Hu VW. Sex hormones in autism: androgens and estrogens differentially and reciprocally regulate RORA, a novel candidate gene for autism. PLoS One. 2011;6(2):e17116. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Sarachana T, Hu VW. Genome-wide identification of transcriptional targets of RORA reveals direct regulation of multiple genes associated with autism spectrum disorder. Mol Autism. 2013;4(1):14. doi: 10.1186/2040-2392-4-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.O’Connor TG, Heron J, Golding J, Glover V. Maternal antenatal anxiety and behavioural/emotional problems in children: a test of a programming hypothesis. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2003;44(7):1025–1036. doi: 10.1111/1469-7610.00187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.



