Abstract
The insulin/IGF1-activated protein kinase Akt phosphorylates Ser487 in the “ST loop” within the C-terminal domain of AMPK-α1, leading to inhibition of phosphorylation by upstream kinases at the activating site, Thr172. Surprisingly, the equivalent site on AMPK-α2, Ser491, is not an Akt target and is modified instead by autophosphorylation. Prior stimulation of HEK-293 cells with IGF1 caused reduced subsequent Thr172 phosphorylation and activation of AMPK-α1 in response to the activator A769662 and the Ca2+ ionophore A23187, effects we show to be dependent on Akt activation and Ser487 phosphorylation. Consistent with this, in three PTEN-null tumour cell lines (in which the lipid phosphatase PTEN that normally restrains the Akt pathway is absent and Akt thus hyper-activated), AMPK was resistant to activation by A769662. However, full AMPK activation could be restored by pharmacological inhibition of Akt, or by re-expression of active PTEN. We also show that inhibition of Thr172 phosphorylation is due to interaction of the phosphorylated ST loop with basic side chains within the αC-helix of the kinase domain. Our findings reveal that a previously unrecognized effect of hyper-activation of Akt in tumour cells is to restrain activation of the LKB1-AMPK pathway, which would otherwise inhibit cell growth and proliferation.
Keywords: AMP-activated protein kinase, AMPK, Akt, cross-talk, tumour suppressor, cancer
INTRODUCTION
The AMP-activated protein kinase is a ubiquitously expressed sensor of cellular energy status [1], which exists in essentially all eukaryotic cells as heterotrimeric complexes comprising a catalytic α subunit and regulatory β and γ subunits. The α subunits are phosphorylated by upstream kinases at conserved threonine residues within the activation loop (Thr172 in rat α1/α2), causing >100-fold activation [2]. Kinases that phosphorylate Thr172 include the tumour suppressor LKB1 [3-5], and the Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent kinase, CaMKKβ [6-8]. The γ subunits contain up to 3 sites where ADP or AMP bind in competition with ATP [9-12]. Binding of AMP or ADP causes conformational changes that enhance net phosphorylation at Thr172 by inhibiting dephosphorylation, while binding of AMP, but not ADP, promotes phosphorylation by LKB1 and causes allosteric activation [10, 13-15]. The drug A769662 and the natural product salicylate mimic the ability of AMP to inhibit Thr-172 dephosphorylation and cause allosteric activation, but bind at a different site involving the β subunit [16-18].
AMPK is thus activated by metabolic stresses that deplete ATP, and increase ADP and AMP. Such stresses include compounds inhibiting mitochondrial ATP synthesis, such as the anti-diabetic drugs metformin and phenformin, and the natural products galegine, resveratrol and berberine [19]. Once activated, AMPK switches on catabolic pathways that generate ATP, while switching off anabolic pathways and other ATP-requiring processes such as progress through the cell cycle [1]. Thus, AMPK has a cytostatic effect on proliferating cells, suggesting that it might exert some of the tumour suppressor effects of its upstream kinase, LKB1. This was supported by recent studies of a mouse B cell lymphoma model, in which AMPK appeared to act as a negative regulator both of the rapid glycolysis (Warburg effect) and the high growth rate of the tumours [20].
If the LKB1-AMPK pathway acts as a tumour suppressor, one might expect many tumour cells to have been selected for mechanisms that down-regulate it. Indeed, somatic loss-of-function mutations in the gene encoding LKB1 (STK11) occur in around 30% of non-small cell lung cancers [21, 22] and 20% of cervical cancers [23]. In the HeLa cell, derived from a cervical cancer that had undergone a large deletion in STK11 [23], increases in AMP and ADP do not enhance Thr172 phosphorylation [4] because the basal activity of CaMKKβ is too low to support this unless intracellular Ca2+ is also elevated [24]. Somatic mutations in genes encoding AMPK appear to be less frequent in tumours than those in STK11, perhaps due to redundancy between multiple AMPK isoforms. However, there may be epigenetic or non-genetic mechanisms by which AMPK is down-regulated in tumour cells. For example, AMPK-α2 expression appears to be frequently down-regulated in hepatocellular carcinoma [25].
The phosphoinositide (PI) 3-kinase-Akt signalling pathway is frequently activated in tumour cells, often via loss of the tumour suppressor PTEN, but also via activating mutations in subunits of PI 3-kinase or upstream receptors [26]. Interestingly, Akt phosphorylates the α1 subunit of rat AMPK at Ser485 (equivalent to Ser487 in human α1), and this was reported to reduce subsequent Thr172 phosphorylation and activation by LKB1 [27]. Cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA) was also reported to phosphorylate Ser485 with similar effects [28]. High glucose and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF1) also caused phosphorylation of AMPK-α1 at Ser487 in porcine vascular smooth muscle cells, and this was associated with reduced Thr172 phosphorylation in response to metformin [29]. This mechanism has also been invoked to account for down-regulation of AMPK in human hepatoma cells infected with hepatitis C virus [30]. However, these studies did not provide definitive proof that the Ser485/Ser487 phosphorylation and the reduced Thr172 phosphorylation observed in the intact cells were causally related.
Ser487 is located in a loop (residues 472-525 in human α1) that is present in the sequences of α subunits from vertebrates and C. elegans but is truncated or absent in insects (D. melanogaster) and fungi (S. cevevisiae) (Fig. S1). This loop was disordered in the crystal structure of a partial mammalian αβγ complex expressed in bacteria [11]. We now refer to it as the “ST loop” because it is rich in serine and threonine residues, and it has recently been shown to be phosphorylated by GSK3 at Thr481 and Ser477 (human numbering), which appeared to promote Thr172 dephosphorylation [31]. In this study, we have examined whether phosphorylation of this loop causes down-regulation of AMPK in tumour cells in which the Akt pathway is hyper-activated. We also provide evidence that the ST loop binds to the kinase domain when phosphorylated at Ser487 by interactions with the αC helix, thus physically blocking access to Thr172.
EXPERIMENTAL
Materials and Proteins
IGF1, rapamycin, berberine, phenformin, quercetin, A23187 were from Sigma. MK2206 and A769662 were synthesized by the Division of Signal Transduction Therapy (DSTT) at the University of Dundee. Plasmids expressing the recombinant human α1β2γ1 and α2β2γ1 complexes were gifts from the DSTT and AstraZeneca respectively. Mutations were introduced using the QuikChange XL site-directed mutagenesis kit (Stratagene). Recombinant human Akt, LKB1 (LKB1:STRADα:MO25α complex) and BRSK2 were provided by the DSTT.
Antibodies
Affinity purified antibodies against AMPK-α subunits [32], against BRSK2 [33], and phospho- and isoform-specific antibodies against Ser487 on AMPK-α1 and Ser491 on AMPK-α2 [34] were as described previously. Anti-FLAG antibodies were from Sigma and against GSK3β were from Santa Cruz. Phosphospecific antibodies against Thr172 on AMPK-α1/α2 (pT172), pan-specific Ser487/Ser491 on AMPK-α1/α2 (pS487/p491), Ser-9 on GSK3β (pS9), Thr308 and Ser473 on Akt (pT308, pS473) and Thr389 on S6KI (pT389) were from Cell Signalling.
Expression and purification of AMPK in bacteria
Auto-induction media was inoculated with overnight cultures of LB media containing the appropriate construct. Cultures were grown at 37°C until A600 ≈ 0.5, where cultures were placed at 20°C overnight. Bacteria was pelleted by centrifugation, lysed under liquid N2 using a pestle and mortar, and resuspended in 50 mM Tris/HCl, pH 8.1, 500 mM NaCl, 20 mM imidazole with EDTA-free protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche). The lysate was purified via the (His)6 tag on the N-terminus of the α subunit using a HisTrap FF column (GE Life Sciences). Fractions containing protein were pooled and dialysed into 50 mM Na Hepes, pH 8.0, 200 mM NaCl.
Sources of cells and cell culture conditions
HEK-293, DBTRG-05MG, U373-MG and G361 cells were from ECACC/HPA (Porton Down, UK) and MDA-MB-468 cells from ATCC/LGC (Teddington, UK). HEK-293 cells stably expressing AMPK-α1/α2 were grown in DMEM containing 4.5 g/L glucose, 10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum (FBS), 100 IU/ml penicillin, 100 μg/ml streptomycin and 200 μg /ml hygromycin. U373-MG cells were grown in MEM containing 10% (v/v) FBS, and non-essential amino acid mix (NEAA). DBTRG-05 MG cells were grown in RPMI-1640 containing 10% (v/v) FBS and NEAA mix. MDA-MB-468 cells were gown in DMEM containing 4.5 g/L glucose and 10% FBS. Lentiviral expression of PTEN or the C124S mutant was as previously described [35]. G361 cells were grown in McCoy’s 5A medium containing 10% (v/v) FBS, 100 IU/ml penicillin and 100 μg/ml streptomycin. All cells were switched to serum-free medium containing low (1g/L) glucose 16 hr prior to treatment with IGF1 in the same medium, except that for G361 cells the normal glucose concentration (3 g/L) was maintained.
AMPK assays in cell-free systems and cell lysates
AMPK activity was measured as described previously [36] but using the AMARA peptide instead of SAMS [37]. Lysates containing stably expressed, recombinant FLAG-tagged α-subunit were immunoprecipitated from HEK-293 cell lysates (70 μg of protein) by incubation at 40C for 2 hr on a roller mixer with 7 μl of EZview Red anti-FLAG M2 affinity gel (Sigma). After extensive washing the immunoprecipitates were assayed for AMPK activity as described [38] using the AMARA peptide. Lysates from other cells (which did not express tagged recombinant AMPK) were immunoprecipitated and assayed for AMPK in the same way, except that anti-α1 or anti-α2 antibody bound to protein G sepharose (GE Healthcare) was used in place of anti-FLAG antibody.
Phosphorylation of GSK3β and AMPK by Akt in cell-free assays
GSK3β (0.5 μg, D200A or D200A/S9A mutants), AMPK (α1β2γ1 complex, D157A or D157A/S487A mutants, or α2β2γ1 complex, D157A or D157A/S491A mutants), were incubated with the indicated amounts of Akt in a final volume of 20 μl for 10 min at 30°C in the presence of 5 mM MgCl2 and 200 μM [γ-32P]ATP (500 cpm/pmol). Incubations were stopped and analyzed by autoradiography of membranes after electrophoretic transfer to detect 32P incorporation, followed by probing with the indicated antibodies.
Phosphorylation of AMPK by LKB1 in cell-free assays
AMPK (0.5 μg, with or without prior phosphorylation by Akt on Ser487) was incubated with the amount of LKB1 indicated in Figure Legends in a final volume of 20 μl for 10 min at 30°C in the presence of 5 mM MgCl2 and 200 μM ATP. AMPK activity was subsequently determined by transferring 5 μl from this reaction to an AMPK assay, as described below. The remaining 15 μl was retained for analysis by Western blotting.
Generation of HEK-293 cells stably expressing α1, α2 or specified mutations
DNAs encoding full-length human α1 and α2 were amplified with primers designed to encode a 5′ Kpn1 site, and a 3′ FLAG-tag followed by an Xho1 site. The resulting PCR products were cloned into the pcDNA5/FRT plasmid (Invitrogen). Stable cell lines were generated and cultured as described previously [19].
Incubation of HEK-293 cells with IGF1 and various activators and inhibitors
HEK-293 cells, stably expressing AMPK (α1 WT, α1-S487A or α2 WT as indicated) were grown to ≈80% confluence and then serum starved for 16 hr. Cells were then treated as described in Figure Legends. Pre-treatments with MK2206 (3 μM) were for 30 min. Pre-treatments with rapamycin (100 nM) were for 45 min. Incubations in the presence of 30 ng/ml IGF1 were for 20 min. Treatments with A769662 (300 μM) were for 40 min (unless otherwise indicated) and those with berberine (300 μM) for 60 min.
Cloning, expression, purification and phosphorylation of the ST loop peptide
DNA encoding residues 466-525 from human AMPK-α1 were amplified by PCR to include an N-terminal Xho1 site and a C-terminal (His)6 tag followed by Kpn1 site, allowing insertion into pGEXKG (GE Life Sciences). Cultures were grown at 37°C until A600 ≈ 0.6, when cultures were induced with 1 mM isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside and placed at 20°C overnight. Bacteria were pelleted by centrifugation, lysed under liquid N2 using a pestle and mortar, and resuspended in 50 mM Tris/HCl, pH 8.1, 500 mM NaCl, 20 mM imidazole with the EDTA-free protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche). The protein was purified using a HisTrap FF column (GE Life Sciences). Fractions containing protein were pooled and incubated for 30 min at 30°C with 5 mM MgCl2 and 200 μM ATP-γ-phosphorothiate in the presence or absence of (His)6-tagged Akt. The mixture was then applied to a 1 ml GST FF column (GE Life Sciences). After washing, the column was loaded with thrombin protease (Sigma) in 50 mM Na Hepes, pH 8, 200 mM NaCl, capped, and left overnight at 4°C. Flow-through fractions containing cleaved phosphorylated or non-phosphorylated peptide was collected.
Western blotting and other analytical procedures
For analysis of ACC phosphorylation, SDS-PAGE was performed using precast Novex NuPAGE Tris-Acetate 3-8% gradient polyacrylamide gels in the Tris-Acetate SDS buffer system. For analysis of all other proteins, SDS-PAGE was performed using precast Novex NuPAGE Bis-Tris 4-12% gradient polyacrylamide gels in the MOPS buffer system (Invitrogen). Proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (Biorad) using the Xcell blot module. Membranes were blocked in Li-Cor Odyssey blocking buffer for 1 hr, and detection performed using the appropriate secondary antibody coupled to IR680 or IR800 dye. Membranes were scanned using the Li-Cor Odyssey IR imager.
Statistical analysis
Unless stated otherwise, statistical significance was tested using GraphPad Prism 5 by 1-way ANOVA, with Bonferroni’s multiple comparison tests of the selected datasets as shown in Figures or Legends.
RESULTS
Akt phosphorylates Ser487 on AMPK-α1 but not the equivalent site on AMPK-α2
Akt phosphorylates serine or threonine residues within the sequence motif RXRXXS/TΦ, where Φ is a bulky hydrophobic residue [39]. Fig. 1A shows an alignment of this consensus with sequences around some established Akt targets, the ST loop sequence containing Ser487 in human α1, and the equivalent site on α2 (Ser491). Both of the latter have serine at P-2, with Akt having a preference for S or T at this position [39]. However, both also have proline rather than arginine at the P-5 position, and Ser491 also has alanine rather than a bulky hydrophobic residue at P+1. Neither is therefore a perfect fit to the Akt consensus; Scansite 2.0 [40] identifies Ser487 as a potential Akt site only at medium stringency, and Ser491 only at low stringency.
To avoid complications caused by autophosphorylation, we initially used inactive mutants of human AMPK complexes (α1-D159A/β2/γ1 and α2-D157A/β2/γ1), with or without α1-S487A or α2-S491A mutations, as substrates for phosphorylation by human Akt. For comparison, we used an inactive (D200A) mutant of the known Akt substrate GSK3β, with or without mutation of the Akt site (Ser9). Interestingly, AMPK-α1 was a reasonable substrate for Akt although not as good as GSK3, while AMPK-α2 was a very poor substrate. Using either an anti-pS9 antibody or by 32P-labelling, phosphorylation of GSK3β was saturated at 0.5 U/ml Akt, when the phosphorylation stoichiometry by 32P labeling was 1.03 mole/mole (Fig. 1B). The phosphorylation of AMPK-α1 within the α1β2γ1 complex was only saturated at 5 U/ml, when the stoichiometry was 0.96 mole/mole (Fig. 1C). For both GSK3β and AMPK-α1, the signals obtained using phosphospecific antibodies (pS9/pS487) or 32P-labelling were abolished by mutation of the respective sites to alanine (G9A/S487A). By contrast, there was much less phosphorylation of Ser491 within the α2β2γ1 complex (Fig. 1D). By 32P-labelling, the stoichiometry of α2 phosphorylation was only 0.18 mole/mole, even with Akt at 30- and 300-fold higher concentrations than those required to obtain stoichiometric phosphorylation of α1 and GSK3β, respectively. Although we did detect some phosphorylation of Ser491 using a phosphospecific antibody and this was abolished in a S491A mutant, 32P-labeling was not affected by the S491A mutation, suggesting that the low level of α2 phosphorylation by Akt was mainly accounted for by modification at other site(s).
Ser487 phosphorylation reduces Thr172 phosphorylation: studies with inactive AMPK
We next tested the ability of the human LKB1:STRADα:MO25α complex to phosphorylate Thr172 in an inactive (α1-D157A) human α1β2γ1 complex. Before phosphorylation by Akt, the rate of phosphorylation of Thr172 by the LKB1 complex was unaffected by an S487A mutation, although an S487D mutation reduced the rate of Thr-172 phosphorylation by about 30% (Fig. 1E). When the inactive (D157A) mutant complex was first phosphorylated by Akt under conditions that yielded stoichiometric Ser487 phosphorylation, subsequent phosphorylation of Thr172 was reduced by about 40%, an effect abolished by an S487A mutation (Fig. 1F).
Phosphorylation of Ser491 on AMPK-α2 is due to autophosphorylation
We next tested the effects of Akt on either WT, S487A or S491A mutants of active α1β2γ1 and α2β2γ1 complexes. Fig 2A shows that with the α1β2γ1 complex there was slight phosphorylation of Ser487 even in the absence of Akt, although phosphorylation of this site increased markedly with increasing Akt. By contrast, Ser491 in an α2β2γ1 complex appeared to be fully phosphorylated in the absence of Akt, and addition of Akt had no further effect. These results suggested that Ser491 was modified by autophosphorylation, while Ser487 is phosphorylated by Akt, with a small degree of autophosphorylation. Consistent with this, there was substantial phosphorylation of Ser491 in a human α2β2γ1 complex, and slight phosphorylation of Ser487 in a human α1β2γ1 complex, when they were incubated with MgATP alone; these effects were completely abolished by D157A mutations that rendered the complexes inactive, although Ser487 could still be phosphorylated by Akt in the inactive complex (Fig. 2B). Unlike the equivalent α1β2γ1 complexes, where the S487D mutant was phosphorylated at a lower rate (Fig. 1E), the WT, S491A and S491D mutant α2β2γ1 complexes were phosphorylated on Thr172 at equal rates by LKB1 (Fig. 2C).
We also synthesized peptides corresponding to the sequences around Ser485 on rat α1 (S485, TPQRSGSISNYRS) or Ser491 on rat/human α2 (S491, TPQRSCSAAGLHR), and compared them as AMPK substrates with the classical SAMS peptide [36]. Although the SAMS peptide was by far the best substrate, the S491 peptide was also phosphorylated, while the S485 peptide was not phosphorylated at all. The results were identical with rat liver AMPK (a mixture of α1β1γ1 and α2β1γ1 complexes) or with recombinant human α1β2γ1 and α2β2γ1 complexes (Fig. 2D).
Ser487 phosphorylation reduces Thr172 phosphorylation: studies with active AMPK
We next incubated the active α1β2γ1 complex with Akt under conditions where we obtained stoichiometric phosphorylation of Ser487, and subsequently treated with the LKB1 complex under conditions where we could measure the initial rate of Thr172 phosphorylation and consequent activation. As with the inactive complex (Fig. 1F), prior Akt phosphorylation reduced the rate of subsequent Thr172 phosphorylation (Fig. 3A), but using the active complex this could also be seen to be associated with a reduction in activation by LKB1 of about 40% (Fig. 3B); both effects were abolished by an S487A mutation within the ST loop. Fig. 3C shows that the inhibitory effect of prior Ser-487 phosphorylation on Thr172 phosphorylation and AMPK activation was identical using either LKB1 or CaMKKβ, showing that the effect is independent of the upstream kinase utilized.
Phosphorylation of Ser487 in intact cells reduces LKB1-dependent AMPK activation
To test the effects of Ser487 phosphorylation in intact cells, we generated isogenic HEK-293 cells stably expressing FLAG-tagged wild type AMPK-α1 or -α2, or a non-phosphorylatable (S487A) α1 mutant. We have shown previously that when AMPK-β [16] or -γ [19] subunits are expressed using this system, they largely replace the endogenous subunit because they compete for the available α/γ or α/β partners, with free subunits being unstable. This was also true in the present study because we showed that about 70% of total AMPK activity could be immunoprecipitated using anti-FLAG antibody, with the remaining 30% (representing a small proportion with endogenous α subunits) being subsequently precipitated using anti-α1/α2 antibodies. The presence of a small amount of endogenous α subunits does not affect interpretation of the kinase assays shown in Fig. 4, which were conducted in anti-FLAG immunoprecipitates, but a small proportion of AMPK-α subunits detected in the Western blots (e.g. the faint signal obtained using the anti-pS487 antibody in the cells expressing the S487A mutant) may be due to these endogenous subunits.
The cells expressing AMPK-α1 were serum-starved, and some were then treated with IGF1 to activate Akt. As expected, IGF1 resulted in marked increases in phosphorylation of the activating sites on Akt (Thr308, Ser473), which were blocked by the Akt inhibitor MK2206 [41], as was the phosphorylation of Ser9/21 on GSK3-α/β (markers of Akt activation) and Ser487 on AMPK-α1 (Fig. 4A). When cells expressing WT α1 were treated with A769662 the activation of AMPK, and Thr172 phosphorylation, was markedly blunted if the cells had been previously exposed to IGF1, an effect abolished by MK2206. The effect of IGF1 to reduce AMPK activation and phosphorylation of Thr172 correlated with increased Ser487 phosphorylation, and was absent in cells expressing the S487A mutant (Fig. 4B).
Ser491 on AMPK-α2 is not phosphorylated by Akt, but by autophosphorylation
Fig. 4C shows results obtained when serum-starved cells expressing wild type α1 or α2 were treated either with IGF1 or with berberine, which activates AMPK by inhibiting mitochondrial ATP synthesis [19]. As expected, treatment of α1-expressing cells with IGF1 caused increased phosphorylation of Ser487 but not Thr172, while treatment with berberine caused increased phosphorylation of Thr172, accompanied by AMPK activation, but not Ser487. This contrasted markedly with results in α2-expressing cells, where treatment with IGF1 did not increase phosphorylation of Ser491, whereas treatment with berberine caused increased phosphorylation of both Ser491 and Thr172, together with AMPK activation. The results for phosphorylation of Ser487 and Ser491 were very similar whether we used in-house phosphospecific antibodies that are isoform-specific, or a commercial antibody that recognizes the equivalent sites on both α1 and α2. These results are consistent with the results in Figs. 2 and 3, showing that Ser491 on α2 is modified by autophosphorylation, and not by Akt as for Ser487 on α1. As expected, increased phosphorylation of the downstream AMPK target ACC correlated with Thr172 phosphorylation and AMPK activation in both cell lines.
Ser487 is phosphorylated by Akt and not by a kinase downstream of mTORC1
To confirm that Ser487 was phosphorylated directly by Akt in the cells, and not by a downstream kinase such as p70 S6 kinase-1 (S6K1), we tested the effects of rapamycin, an inhibitor of the mechanistic target-of-rapamycin complex-1 (mTORC1). Rapamycin did not block the IGF1-stimulated phosphorylation of Ser487 on α1 or Ser473 on Akt although, as expected, it blocked phosphorylation of an established mTORC1 substrate, Thr389 on the p70/p85 isoforms of S6K1 (Fig. 4D).
Phosphorylation of Ser487 in intact cells reduces CaMKKβ-dependent AMPK activation
To show that phosphorylation of Ser487 on AMPK-α1 by Akt could also reduce subsequent activation by CaMKKβ, we utilized the LKB1-null G361 melanoma cell line. The cells were serum-starved, and some were then treated with IGF1 to activate Akt. As expected, IGF1 resulted in marked increases in phosphorylation of Thr308 and Ser473 on Akt, Ser9/21 on GSK3-α/β and Ser487 on AMPK-α1, all of which were blocked or reduced by MK2206 (Fig. 5). When the cells were treated with the Ca2+ ionophore A23187 to activate CaMKKβ, the activation of AMPK, and Thr172 phosphorylation, was significantly blunted if the cells had been previously exposed to IGF1, an effect completely abolished by MK2206 (Fig. 5).
AMPK activation is reduced in PTEN-null tumour cells in an Akt-dependent manner
To examine whether hyper-activation of Akt in tumour cells due to PTEN loss might also inhibit AMPK activation, we initially examined the PTEN-null glioblastoma cell line, DBTRG-05MG. We first tested a range of AMPK activators to see if any interfered with Akt activation. Surprisingly, phenformin and quercetin blocked phosphorylation of Akt at Ser473, although berberine, A769662 and A23187 did not (Fig. S2A). As expected, all agents also increased the phosphorylation of ACC1 at Ser79 and AMPK at Thr172 in mouse embryo fibroblasts (MEFs), although the effect of A769662 on Thr172 phosphorylation was small, indicating that it was mainly acting through an allosteric mechanism (Fig. S2B). The inhibitory effects of phenformin and quercetin on Akt Ser473 phosphorylation were seen in WT MEFs, but were “off-target”, AMPK-independent effects, because they were also observed in double knockout (α1−/− α2−/−, AMPK KO) MEFs (Fig. S2B/C). To avoid this complication, in subsequent studies we focused on effects of A769662, which activates AMPK by direct binding to the β subunit [16, 17] and does not inhibit ATP synthesis [19] or Akt Ser473 phosphorylation (Fig. S2).
AMPK in DBTRG-05MG cells was activated by A769662, but activation (Fig. 6A) and Thr172 phosphorylation (Fig. 6B) were greatly enhanced when the selective Akt inhibitor, MK2206, was added prior to A769662. Thus, reduced activation of AMPK in these cells was Akt-dependent. As expected, inhibition of Akt by MK2206 was associated with greatly reduced phosphorylation of Ser487, and of the Akt site on GSK3β, Ser9 (Fig. 6B). As reported previously [41], MK2206 also blocked the phosphorylation of Akt at the activating sites, Thr308 and Ser473.
We also examined the effect of re-expressing PTEN in DBTRG-05MG cells, using a lentiviral vector that gives levels of expression similar to normal cells. As a control, we expressed a C124S mutant that has no lipid phosphatase activity. Prior expression of wild type PTEN enhanced the activation (Fig. 6C) and Thr-172 phosphorylation (Fig. 6D) of AMPK in response to A769662. When compared with the C124S mutant, expression of wild type PTEN was associated with decreased phosphorylation of Ser487 on AMPK-α1 and Ser9 on GSK3β, and markedly decreased phosphorylation of Thr308 and Ser473 on Akt (Fig. 6D).
We also studied two other PTEN-null human cell lines, i.e. U373-MG (another glioblastoma line) and MDA-MB-468 (a breast cancer line). Similar to the DBTRG-05MG cells, there was a modest activation (Fig. 6E/G) and Thr172 phosphorylation (Fig. 6F/H) of AMPK in response to A769662, but both were enhanced when Akt was inhibited using MK2206.
The phosphorylated ST loop interacts with the kinase domain, hindering access to Thr172
We next addressed the mechanism by which Ser487 phosphorylation inhibits subsequent Thr172 phosphorylation. In the structure of a partial mammalian α1β2γ1 complex, the ST loop from Ile470 to Asp523 (rat numbering) was disordered [11]; the complex had been expressed in bacteria, so the ST loop was likely to be unphosphorylated. In a subsequent structure [10] the ST loop was deleted as it was thought that it might hinder crystallization. However, the location of the residues at the ends of the loop (Glu469 and Val524) in this structure show that they lie close to the kinase domain, being about 20 and 40 Å from Thr172, respectively (Fig. 7A). We hypothesized that the ST loop might interact with the kinase domain when phosphorylated on Ser487. We also noticed three basic residues, Arg62, Lys69 and Arg72 (rat α1 numbering), which are located within the “αC helix” of the small lobe of the kinase domain. An extension of our hypothesis was that phosphate groups on the ST loop interact with these basic side chains, triggering a stable interaction between the ST loop and the kinase domain that physically blocks access of Thr-172 to upstream kinases.
To test the first hypothesis, we made a construct expressing the peptide from Arg466 to Asp525 on human α1 as a glutathione-S-transferase (GST) fusion. The protein was expressed in and purified from bacteria, the GST domain removed, and the remaining peptide (R466-D525) either thiophosphorylated using ATP-γ-S and Akt (thiophosphate being resistant to protein phosphatases), or left unphosphorylated. Consistent with our hypothesis, the phosphopeptide caused a concentration-dependent inhibition of activation and Thr172 phosphorylation of the bacterially expressed α1β2γ1 complex by LKB1, although we were unable to generate the peptide at high enough concentrations to fully saturate inhibition. By contrast, the unphosphorylated peptide had no effect (Fig. 7B). To confirm that inhibition of activation loop phosphorylation was specific to AMPK, we showed that neither the phospho- nor the dephospho-peptide inhibited activation and phosphorylation of the AMPK-related kinase BRSK2 by LKB1 (Fig. 7C).
To test the extended hypothesis, we made a triple mutation (R64A/K71A/R74A, human α1 numbering, “AAA mutant”), in the context of the recombinant human α1β2γ1 complex used in Fig. 3, of the three basic residues in the kinase domain that we propose to interact with phosphate groups on the ST loop. Consistent with our hypothesis, prior phosphorylation of the wild type complex by Akt reduced subsequent activation and Thr172 phosphorylation by LKB1, but this effect was completely abolished by either an S487A mutant or an AAA mutant, even though the latter was still phosphorylated on Ser487 by Akt (Fig. 7D).
Discussion
It has been previously reported that prior phosphorylation of Ser485 on rat AMPK-α1 by Akt, within a rat α1β1γ1 complex, caused a 40% reduction in the rate of subsequent phosphorylation of Thr172 and activation by LKB1 in cell-free assays, an effect that was abolished by a non-phosphorylatable S485A substitution [27]. In this study, we have followed up this observation and made several new findings. Firstly, we demonstrated identical effects with the equivalent site (Ser487) on the human α1β2γ1 complex (Figs. 1F, 4), showing that the effect is conserved in humans and is also independent of the β subunit isoform. Secondly, we show that the effect is not specific to the upstream kinase LKB1 but is also observed with CaMKKβ (Fig. 3C). Thirdly, we report that Ser491 (the site equivalent to Ser487 in AMPK-α2) is an extremely poor substrate for Akt, and that the very low level of α2 phosphorylation obtained using Akt is not affected by an S491A mutation (Fig. 1D). It had previously been shown using a bacterially expressed α2β1γ1 complex that Akt phosphorylated AMPK-α2, albeit more slowly than α1 [27] and, although the phosphorylation site(s) had not been identified, it has generally been assumed that this phosphorylation occurred at Ser491. That Ser491 is modified instead by autophosphorylation is shown by the following findings: (i) substantial phosphorylation of Ser491 occurred with the recombinant human α2β2γ1 complex in the absence of exogenous kinases (Fig. 2A/B); (ii) Ser491 phosphorylation did not occur with an inactive (D157A mutant) complex (Fig. 2B); (iii) various forms of AMPK, including the human α2β2γ1 complex, phosphorylated a synthetic peptide corresponding to the sequence around Ser491, but not Ser485 on rat α1 (Fig. 2D); (iv) Ser491 on AMPK-α2 became phosphorylated in response to the AMPK activator berberine in HEK-293 cells, whereas Ser487 on AMPK-α1 did not (Fig. 4C). Although further work is required to test whether autophosphorylation of Ser491 down-regulates Thr172 phosphorylation, this is not supported by the results in Fig. 2C, where the activation of the human α2β2γ1 complex by LKB1 was not affected by a potentially phosphomimetic S491D mutation. Thus, the ability of Akt-activating treatments such as insulin and IGF-1 to restrain activation of AMPK by ST loop phosphorylation is limited to complexes containing the α1 isoform.
Although Ser487 in the human α1β2γ1 complex also appeared to autophosphorylate to a limited extent in cell-free assays (Fig. 2A), increased Ser487 phosphorylation did not occur when intact cells were incubated with the AMPK activator berberine (Fig. 4C), suggesting that autophosphorylation of Ser487 is not significant in intact cells. Interestingly, the small degree of Ser487 autophosphorylation in cell-free assays did not increase when the α1β2γ1 complex was activated by phosphorylation at Thr172 by LKB1 (Fig. 2B, top left), suggesting that Thr172 phosphorylation (unlike its effects on phosphorylation of exogenous substrates) does not enhance Ser487 autophosphorylation. Our results show that Ser487 in human α1, unlike Ser491 in α2, is a good substrate for Akt. Although only phosphorylated in cell-free assays at about 10% of the rate of Ser9 on GSK3-β (a canonical Akt site), in the intact cells the net phosphorylation status would also be affected by the activity of protein phosphatases acting on Ser487. The results using MK2206 in Figs. 4 and 6 clearly confirm that Ser487 is phosphorylated in four distinct cell lines in an Akt-dependent manner.
In good agreement with previous results obtained with the rat α1β1γ1 complex [27], prior phosphorylation of Ser487 on the human α1β2γ1 complex caused a 40% reduction in subsequent phosphorylation of Thr172 both in active (Fig. 3A) and inactive (Fig. 1F) AMPK complexes, and a reduction in the activation of the active complex (Fig. 3B). Although a 40% effect might appear to be quite modest, the effect appears to be larger in intact cells (Figs. 4 and 6), where the activities of phosphatases acting on Ser487 would affect the outcome. Another explanation for the different size of the effect in cell-free assays and intact cells is that other sites in the ST loop may be phosphorylated in the intact cells, a possibility discussed further below.
By using HEK-293 cells expressing recombinant AMPK-α1, we showed not only that the effect of prior IGF1 treatment to inhibit subsequent AMPK activation by A769662 was dependent on Akt, but also that it was dependent on phosphorylation of Ser487, since the effect was completely abolished in cells expressing a non-phosphorylatable S487A mutant (Fig. 4). It has recently been reported that Ser491 on AMPK-α2 can be phosphorylated by S6K1 [42], so we considered the possibility that Ser487 might have been phosphorylated by a kinase downstream of Akt and mTORC1, such as S6K1, rather than directly by Akt. However, the phosphorylation of Ser487 was not affected by rapamycin (Fig. 4D), so was not catalyzed by S6K1 or any other kinase downstream of mTORC1.
Using the LKB1-null G361 cell line treated with the Ca2+ ionophore A23187, we also showed that phosphorylation of Thr172, and activation of AMPK, by CaMKKβ was antagonized by prior phosphorylation of Ser487. This supports results obtained in cell-free assays (Fig. 3C), and shows that the effect in intact cells is independent of the upstream kinase utilized.
Surprisingly, we found that phosphorylation of Akt at the mTORC2 site, Ser473, was blocked by certain AMPK activators including phenformin and quercetin, although not by berberine, A769662 or A23817. Although the mechanism for this effect remains unclear, it is clearly an off-target, AMPK-independent effect, because it was still observed in AMPK knockout MEFs (Fig. S2).
To place our studies in the context of tumour cells, we also addressed whether AMPK activation was down-regulated in three PTEN-null tumour cell lines derived from human cancers. Interestingly, in two glioblastoma cell lines and a breast cancer cell line in which Akt was hyper-activated due to loss of PTEN, AMPK was rather resistant to activation and Thr-172 phosphorylation induced by the activator A769662. However, this effect was reversed by the addition of MK2206, a selective inhibitor of Akt activation that also reduced or abolished the phosphorylation of AMPK-α1 on Ser487, of GSK3β on Ser9 and of Akt itself on Thr308 and Ser473. These effects could also be reversed in DBTRG-05MG cells by re-expressing wild type PTEN, but not a phosphatase-inactive (C124S) mutant. Our results suggest that a previously unrecognized effect of PTEN loss is to reduce the potential restraint on cell growth and proliferation provided by activation of AMPK. This mechanism would also be expected to operate in tumour cells in which Akt is hyper-activated due to activating mutations in subunits of PI 3-kinase, or mutation or over-expression of upstream receptors [26]. Previous evidence suggests that this mechanism also operates in human hepatoma (Huh-7) cells infected with hepatitis C virus [30], where PI 3-kinase is activated due to association with a non-structural protein encoded by the viral RNA [43]. In that case, expression of viral proteins was reduced by treating the infected Huh-7 cells with AMPK activators such as 5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide riboside (AICAR) or metformin [30].
Finally, our results suggest a molecular mechanism by which prior phosphorylation at Ser487 inhibits subsequent phosphorylation of Thr-172, and hence activation, by upstream kinases. In a partial α1β2γ1 complex containing rat α1, which was expressed in bacteria and where Ser485 was therefore most likely unphosphorylated, the ST loop from Glu469 to Val524 was not resolved, indicating that it was mobile within the crystal [11]. Our hypothesis is that the ST loop interacts with residues within the kinase domain when Ser487 is phosphorylated, hindering the ability of upstream kinases to gain access to Thr172. This hypothesis is supported by the results in Fig. 7, showing that a peptide corresponding to the sequence from Arg466 to Asp525 on human α1 inhibits activation and Thr172 phosphorylation of an α1β2γ1 complex by LKB1, but only when phosphorylated on the residue corresponding to Ser487. This is an extremely specific effect, because the phosphopeptide had no effect on the activation or phosphorylation by LKB1 of BRSK2, which (with BRSK1) has the kinase domain most closely related to AMPK-α1 and -α2 within the human kinome.
The 54 residues of the ST loop in human AMPK-α1 contains 15 serines (including Ser487) and 5 threonines, most of which are conserved in α1 subunits from other vertebrates and in C. elegans (Fig. S1). Recently, it has been shown that GSK3β phosphorylates the ST loop at multiple sites, with site-directed mutagenesis suggesting that the initial phosphorylation was at Thr481, followed by Ser477 and perhaps Thr473 (human α1 residue numbering; in rats the equivalent residues are Thr479, Ser475 and Thr471). Thr481 phosphorylation was proposed to inhibit net Thr172 phosphorylation by enhancing its sensitivity to dephosphorylation [31]. With most substrates, phosphorylation by GSK3 requires “priming” by another kinase, because the kinase usually phosphorylates serine or threonine located four residues N-terminal to an existing phosphoamino acid [44]. In the case of AMPK it was proposed that phosphorylation of Ser487 on rat AMPK-α1 might promote phosphorylation of Thr481, although not by conventional priming because the residue spacing is not appropriate, and because phosphorylation was not affected by a GSK3β mutation that reduces phosphorylation of primed substrates [31]. If the hypothesis of Suzuki et al is correct, phosphorylation of Ser487 may lead to additional phosphorylation events within the ST loop. This might explain why we observed a larger effect on AMPK activation and Thr172 phosphorylation by modulation of Akt in intact cells than in cell-free assays (compare Figs. 1 and 3 with Figs. 4-6). Although GSK3β was phosphorylated at Ser9 in response to Akt treatment and this normally inhibits GSK3 activity [45], this inhibition does not occur with “unprimed” substrates [46] as proposed for Thr481 [31]. Thus, it is possible that phosphorylation of Ser487 in our intact cell experiments promoted additional phosphorylation events, such as phosphorylation of Thr481 and Ser477 by GSK3.
As an extension of this hypothesis, we propose that the side chains of three basic residues located in the αC-helix of the small lobe of the kinase domain (Arg64, Lys71 and Arg74 in human α1) interact with multiple phosphate groups attached to the ST loop, thus anchoring the ST loop to the kinase domain and blocking access of Thr172 to upstream kinases. Interestingly, although at least one of these (Arg64 or Lys71) is conserved in all twelve AMPK-related kinases, none are conserved in the archetypal serine/threonine kinase domain of PKA. Consistent with our hypothesis, a human α1β2γ1 complex containing an “AAA” mutation (R64A/K71A/K74A) was completely resistant to the ability of prior Akt phosphorylation to reduce the rate of Thr172 phosphorylation by LKB1 (Fig. 7D). Also consistent with this model was our finding that prior Akt phosphorylation reduced activation by both upstream kinases (LKB1 and CaMKKβ) to very similar extents (Fig. 3C). Final confirmation of this model will require structural analysis of AMPK complexes where the ST loop is present in a phosphorylated form, rather than being unphosphorylated or deleted as in existing structures [10, 11].
Since AMPK activators such as AICAR or metformin can overcome the inhibitory effects of Ser487 phosphorylation on replication of hepatitis C virus [30], our present results raise the exciting prospect that AMPK activators such as metformin, which are already used to treat type 2 diabetes, might also be efficacious in treatment of tumours in which the Akt pathway is hyper-activated. It is already known from retrospective studies that treatment of diabetics with metformin is associated with a lower incidence of cancer compared with other medications [47, 48], although it is not yet certain that this effect is mediated by AMPK. Our results suggest that clinical trials to test the efficacy of metformin for cancer treatment might be targeted at specific classes of tumour, such as those in which Akt is hyper-activated.
Supplementary Material
Summary statement.
Akt phosphorylates the α1 subunit of AMPK at Ser487, leading to reduced Thr172 phosphorylation and activation by LKB1. We establish a molecular mechanism for this effect and show that it causes down-regulation of AMPK in several PTEN-null tumour cell lines.
Acknowledgments
FUNDING DGH, SAH and FAR were supported by a Senior Investigator Award from the Wellcome Trust [097726] and by the pharmaceutical companies supporting the Division of Signal Transduction Therapy at Dundee (AstraZeneca, Boehringer-Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck KgaA, Janssen Pharmaceutica and Pfizer). GJG was supported by a studentship from AstraZeneca. PT and NRL were supported by a Programme Grant from the Medical Research Council [G0801865].
Abbreviations
- Akt
protein kinase B
- AMPK
AMP-activated protein kinase
- BRSK
brain specific kinase
- CaMKK
calmodulin-dependent kinase kinase
- GSK3
glycogen synthase kinase-3
- IGF1
insulin-like growth factor-1
- LKB1
liver kinase B1
- PI
phosphoinositide
- MO25
mouse protein-25
- PTEN
phosphatase and tensin homologue
- ST loop
serine/threonine-rich loop
- STRAD
Ste20-related adapter protein
REFERENCES
- 1.Hardie DG, Ross FA, Hawley SA. AMPK: a nutrient and energy sensor that maintains energy homeostasis. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2012;13:251–262. doi: 10.1038/nrm3311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Hawley SA, Davison M, Woods A, Davies SP, Beri RK, Carling D, Hardie DG. Characterization of the AMP-activated protein kinase kinase from rat liver, and identification of threonine-172 as the major site at which it phosphorylates and activates AMP-activated protein kinase. J. Biol. Chem. 1996;271:27879–27887. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.44.27879. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Woods A, Johnstone SR, Dickerson K, Leiper FC, Fryer LG, Neumann D, Schlattner U, Wallimann T, Carlson M, Carling D. LKB1 is the upstream kinase in the AMP-activated protein kinase cascade. Curr. Biol. 2003;13:2004–2008. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2003.10.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Hawley SA, Boudeau J, Reid JL, Mustard KJ, Udd L, Makela TP, Alessi DR, Hardie DG. Complexes between the LKB1 tumor suppressor, STRADα/β and MO25α/β are upstream kinases in the AMP-activated protein kinase cascade. J. Biol. 2003;2:28. doi: 10.1186/1475-4924-2-28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Shaw RJ, Kosmatka M, Bardeesy N, Hurley RL, Witters LA, DePinho RA, Cantley LC. The tumor suppressor LKB1 kinase directly activates AMP-activated kinase and regulates apoptosis in response to energy stress. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2004;101:3329–3335. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0308061100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Woods A, Dickerson K, Heath R, Hong SP, Momcilovic M, Johnstone SR, Carlson M, Carling D. Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase kinase-beta acts upstream of AMP-activated protein kinase in mammalian cells. Cell Metab. 2005;2:21–33. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2005.06.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Hawley SA, Pan DA, Mustard KJ, Ross L, Bain J, Edelman AM, Frenguelli BG, Hardie DG. Calmodulin-dependent protein kinase kinase-beta is an alternative upstream kinase for AMP-activated protein kinase. Cell Metab. 2005;2:9–19. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2005.05.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hurley RL, Anderson KA, Franzone JM, Kemp BE, Means AR, Witters LA. The Ca2+/calmoldulin-dependent protein kinase kinases are AMP-activated protein kinase kinases. J. Biol. Chem. 2005;280:29060–29066. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M503824200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Scott JW, Hawley SA, Green KA, Anis M, Stewart G, Scullion GA, Norman DG, Hardie DG. CBS domains form energy-sensing modules whose binding of adenosine ligands is disrupted by disease mutations. J. Clin. Invest. 2004;113:274–284. doi: 10.1172/JCI19874. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Xiao B, Sanders MJ, Underwood E, Heath R, Mayer FV, Carmena D, Jing C, Walker PA, Eccleston JF, Haire LF, Saiu P, Howell SA, Aasland R, Martin SR, Carling D, Gamblin SJ. Structure of mammalian AMPK and its regulation by ADP. Nature. 2011;472:230–233. doi: 10.1038/nature09932. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Xiao B, Heath R, Saiu P, Leiper FC, Leone P, Jing C, Walker PA, Haire L, Eccleston JF, Davis CT, Martin SR, Carling D, Gamblin SJ. Structural basis for AMP binding to mammalian AMP-activated protein kinase. Nature. 2007;449:496–500. doi: 10.1038/nature06161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Chen L, Wang J, Zhang YY, Yan SF, Neumann D, Schlattner U, Wang ZX, Wu JW. AMP-activated protein kinase undergoes nucleotide-dependent conformational changes. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2012;19:716–718. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.2319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Davies SP, Helps NR, Cohen PTW, Hardie DG. 5′-AMP inhibits dephosphorylation, as well as promoting phosphorylation, of the AMP-activated protein kinase. Studies using bacterially expressed human protein phosphatase-2Cα and native bovine protein phosphatase-2AC. FEBS Lett. 1995;377:421–425. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(95)01368-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hawley SA, Selbert MA, Goldstein EG, Edelman AM, Carling D, Hardie DG. 5′-AMP activates the AMP-activated protein kinase cascade, and Ca2+/calmodulin the calmodulin-dependent protein kinase I cascade, via three independent mechanisms. J. Biol. Chem. 1995;270:27186–27191. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.45.27186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Gowans GJ, Hawley SA, Ross FA, Hardie DG. AMP is a true physiological regulator of AMP-activated protein kinase, both by allosteric activation and by enhancing net phosphorylation. Cell Metab. 2013 doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2013.08.019. in press. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Hawley SA, Fullerton MD, Ross FA, Schertzer JD, Chevtzoff C, Walker KJ, Peggie MW, Zibrova D, Green KA, Mustard KJ, Kemp BE, Sakamoto K, Steinberg GR, Hardie DG. The ancient drug salicylate directly activates AMP-activated protein kinase. Science. 2012;336:918–922. doi: 10.1126/science.1215327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Sanders MJ, Ali ZS, Hegarty BD, Heath R, Snowden MA, Carling D. Defining the mechanism of activation of AMP-activated protein kinase by the small molecule A-769662, a member of the thienopyridone family. J. Biol. Chem. 2007;282:32539–32548. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M706543200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Goransson O, McBride A, Hawley SA, Ross FA, Shpiro N, Foretz M, Viollet B, Hardie DG, Sakamoto K. Mechanism of action of A-769662, a valuable tool for activation of AMP-activated protein kinase. J. Biol. Chem. 2007;282:32549–32560. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M706536200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Hawley SA, Ross FA, Chevtzoff C, Green KA, Evans A, Fogarty S, Towler MC, Brown LJ, Ogunbayo OA, Evans AM, Hardie DG. Use of cells expressing gamma subunit variants to identify diverse mechanisms of AMPK activation. Cell Metab. 2010;11:554–565. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2010.04.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Faubert B, Boily G, Izreig S, Griss T, Samborska B, Dong Z, Dupuy F, Chambers C, Fuerth BJ, Viollet B, Mamer OA, Avizonis D, Deberardinis RJ, Siegel PM, Jones RG. AMPK Is a negative regulator of the Warburg effect and suppresses tumor growth In vivo. Cell Metab. 2012;17:113–124. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2012.12.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Sanchez-Cespedes M, Parrella P, Esteller M, Nomoto S, Trink B, Engles JM, Westra WH, Herman JG, Sidransky D. Inactivation of LKB1/STK11 is a common event in adenocarcinomas of the lung. Cancer Res. 2002;62:3659–3662. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Ji H, Ramsey MR, Hayes DN, Fan C, McNamara K, Kozlowski P, Torrice C, Wu MC, Shimamura T, Perera SA, Liang MC, Cai D, Naumov GN, Bao L, Contreras CM, Li D, Chen L, Krishnamurthy J, Koivunen J, Chirieac LR, Padera RF, Bronson RT, Lindeman NI, Christiani DC, Lin X, Shapiro GI, Janne PA, Johnson BE, Meyerson M, Kwiatkowski DJ, Castrillon DH, Bardeesy N, Sharpless NE, Wong KK. LKB1 modulates lung cancer differentiation and metastasis. Nature. 2007;448:807–810. doi: 10.1038/nature06030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Wingo SN, Gallardo TD, Akbay EA, Liang MC, Contreras CM, Boren T, Shimamura T, Miller DS, Sharpless NE, Bardeesy N, Kwiatkowski DJ, Schorge JO, Wong KK, Castrillon DH. Somatic LKB1 mutations promote cervical cancer progression. PLoS ONE. 2009;4:e5137. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Fogarty S, Hawley SA, Green KA, Saner N, Mustard KJ, Hardie DG. Calmodulin-dependent protein kinase kinase-beta activates AMPK without forming a stable complex - synergistic effects of Ca2+ and AMP. Biochem. J. 2010;426:109–118. doi: 10.1042/BJ20091372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Lee CW, Wong LL, Tse EY, Liu HF, Leong VY, Lee JM, Hardie DG, Ng IO, Ching YP. AMPK promotes p53 acetylation via phosphorylation and inactivation of SIRT1 in liver cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2012;72:4394–4404. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-0429. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Yuan TL, Cantley LC. PI3K pathway alterations in cancer: variations on a theme. Oncogene. 2008;27:5497–5510. doi: 10.1038/onc.2008.245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Horman S, Vertommen D, Heath R, Neumann D, Mouton V, Woods A, Schlattner U, Wallimann T, Carling D, Hue L, Rider MH. Insulin antagonizes ischemia-induced Thr172 phosphorylation of AMP-activated protein kinase alpha-subunits in heart via hierarchical phosphorylation of Ser485/491. J. Biol. Chem. 2006;281:5335–5340. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M506850200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Hurley RL, Barre LK, Wood SD, Anderson KA, Kemp BE, Means AR, Witters LA. Regulation of AMP-activated protein kinase by multisite phosphorylation in response to agents that elevate cellular cAMP. J. Biol. Chem. 2006;281:36662–36672. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M606676200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Ning J, Xi G, Clemmons DR. Suppression of AMPK activation via S485 phosphorylation by IGF-I during hyperglycemia is mediated by AKT activation in vascular smooth muscle cells. Endocrinology. 2011;152:3143–3154. doi: 10.1210/en.2011-0155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Mankouri J, Tedbury PR, Gretton S, Hughes ME, Griffin SD, Dallas ML, Green KA, Hardie DG, Peers C, Harris M. Enhanced hepatitis C virus genome replication and lipid accumulation mediated by inhibition of AMP-activated protein kinase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2010;107:11549–11554. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0912426107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Suzuki T, Bridges D, Nakada D, Skiniotis G, Morrison SJ, Lin JD, Saltiel AR, Inoki K. Inhibition of AMPK catabolic action by GSK3. Mol. Cell. 2013;50:407–419. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2013.03.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Woods A, Salt I, Scott J, Hardie DG, Carling D. The α1 and α2 isoforms of the AMP-activated protein kinase have similar activities in rat liver but exhibit differences in substrate specificity in vitro. FEBS Lett. 1996;397:347–351. doi: 10.1016/s0014-5793(96)01209-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Lizcano JM, Göransson O, Toth R, Deak M, Morrice NA, Boudeau J, Hawley SA, Udd L, Mäkelä TP, Hardie DG, Alessi DR. LKB1 is a master kinase that activates 13 protein kinases of the AMPK subfamily, including the MARK/PAR-1 kinases. EMBO J. 2004;23:833–843. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Woods A, Vertommen D, Neumann D, Turk R, Bayliss J, Schlattner U, Wallimann T, Carling D, Rider MH. Identification of phosphorylation sites in AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) for upstream AMPK kinases and study of their roles by site-directed mutagenesis. J. Biol. Chem. 2003;278:28434–28442. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M303946200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Davidson L, Maccario H, Perera NM, Yang X, Spinelli L, Tibarewal P, Glancy B, Gray A, Weijer CJ, Downes CP, Leslie NR. Suppression of cellular proliferation and invasion by the concerted lipid and protein phosphatase activities of PTEN. Oncogene. 2010;29:687–697. doi: 10.1038/onc.2009.384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Davies SP, Carling D, Hardie DG. Tissue distribution of the AMP-activated protein kinase, and lack of activation by cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase, studied using a specific and sensitive peptide assay. Eur. J. Biochem. 1989;186:123–128. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1989.tb15185.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Dale S, Wilson WA, Edelman AM, Hardie DG. Similar substrate recognition motifs for mammalian AMP-activated protein kinase, higher plant HMG-CoA reductase kinase-A, yeast SNF1, and mammalian calmodulin-dependent protein kinase I. FEBS Lett. 1995;361:191–195. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(95)00172-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Towler MC, Fogarty S, Hawley SA, Pan DA, Martin D, Morrice NA, McCarthy A, Galardo MN, Meroni SB, Cigorraga SB, Ashworth A, Sakamoto K, Hardie DG. A novel short splice variant of the tumour suppressor LKB1 is required for spermiogenesis. Biochem. J. 2008;416:1–14. doi: 10.1042/BJ20081447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Obata T, Yaffe MB, Leparc GG, Piro ET, Maegawa H, Kashiwagi A, Kikkawa R, Cantley LC. Peptide and protein library screening defines optimal substrate motifs for AKT/PKB. J. Biol. Chem. 2000;275:36108–36115. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M005497200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Obenauer JC, Cantley LC, Yaffe MB. Scansite 2. Proteome-wide prediction of cell signaling interactions using short sequence motifs. Nucl. Acids Res. 2003;31:3635–3641. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkg584. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Hirai H, Sootome H, Nakatsuru Y, Miyama K, Taguchi S, Tsujioka K, Ueno Y, Hatch H, Majumder PK, Pan BS, Kotani H. MK-2206, an allosteric Akt inhibitor, enhances antitumor efficacy by standard chemotherapeutic agents or molecular targeted drugs in vitro and in vivo. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2010;9:1956–1967. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-09-1012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Dagon Y, Hur E, Zheng B, Wellenstein K, Cantley LC, Kahn BB. p70S6 Kinase phosphorylates AMPK on serine 491 to mediate leptin’s effect on food intake. Cell Metab. 2012;16:104–112. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2012.05.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Street A, Macdonald A, Crowder K, Harris M. The Hepatitis C virus NS5A protein activates a phosphoinositide 3-kinase-dependent survival signaling cascade. J. Biol. Chem. 2004;279:12232–12241. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M312245200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Roach PJ. Multisite and hierarchal protein phosphorylation. J. Biol. Chem. 1991;266:14139–14142. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Cross DA, Alessi DR, Cohen P, Andjelkovich M, Hemmings BA. Inhibition of glycogen synthase kinase-3 by insulin mediated by protein kinase B. Nature. 1995;378:785–789. doi: 10.1038/378785a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Frame S, Cohen P, Biondi RM. A common phosphate binding site explains the unique substrate specificity of GSK3 and its inactivation by phosphorylation. Mol. Cell. 2001;7:1321–1327. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(01)00253-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Evans JM, Donnelly LA, Emslie-Smith AM, Alessi DR, Morris AD. Metformin and reduced risk of cancer in diabetic patients. BMJ. 2005;330:1304–1305. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38415.708634.F7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Decensi A, Puntoni M, Goodwin P, Cazzaniga M, Gennari A, Bonanni B, Gandini S. Metformin and cancer risk in diabetic patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Prev. Res. (Phila) 2010;3:1451–1461. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-10-0157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.