Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Feb 25.
Published in final edited form as: MethodsX. 2014;1:168–174. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2014.08.012

Table 1. Suppression assay summary.

Percent suppression using the percentage of proliferating cells (%) Percent suppression using the Divison Index (%)
Experiment Ratio Treg:Tresp Number Treg/Tconv CCR5low Treg CCR5high Treg Tconv CCR5low Treg CCR5high Treg Tconv
A 1:1 10 000 28.5 32.1 0.0 82.0 87.4 37.1
B 1:1 5 000 75.1 81.4 −16.0 96.1 95.9 44.9
C 1:1 10 000 58.8 83.6 16.7 75.2 88.1 46.6
D 1:1 10 000 6.7 46.6 −1.3 28.8 61.3 −2.7
C 1:2 5 000 45.3 77.7 11.6 85.1 91.8 39.1
D 1:2 5 000 8.7 34.3 16.8 37.8 74.8 −34.2
E 1:2 5 000 55.1 72.2 −0.7 85.8 92.8 4.1
C 1:4 2 500 29.7 60.9 −2.7 61.5 85.1 16.8
D 1:4 2 500 0.0 6.0 −9.4 3.6 28.8 0.9
Pooled data for ratios 1:1 and 1:2 Median (interquartile range) 45.3 (18.6-56.9) 72.2 (40.4-79.6) −0.7 (−2.1-14.1) 82.0 (56.5-85.5) 88.1 (81.1-92.3) 37.1 (69.2-42.0)
Percent suppression method CCR5low Treg versus Tconv CCR5high Treg versus Tconv CCR5low Treg versus CCR5high Treg
Percentage of proliferating cells 0.043 0.018 0.018
Division index 0.018 0.018 0.028

The percent suppression of Tresp proliferation is shown for CRC-isolated CCR5low Treg, CCR5high Treg and Tconv at different Treg:Tresp ratios. The number of Treg/Tconv represents the number of sort events given by the MoFlo XDP High-Speed Cell Sorter, rather than the absolute number of sorted viable cells.

The differences in percent suppression for ratios of 1:1 and 1:2 between different cell populations were tested for statistical significance using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test (P-values shown below).