Abstract
Integrative gene network approaches enable new avenues of exploration that implicate causal genes in sporadic late onset Alzheimer’s disease (LOAD) pathogenesis, thereby offering novel insights for drug discovery programs. We previously constructed a probabilistic causal network model of sporadic LOAD and identified TYROBP/DAP12, a microglial transmembrane signaling polypeptide and direct adapter of TREM2, as the most robust key driver gene in the network. Here we show that absence of TYROBP/DAP12 in a mouse model of AD-type cerebral Aβ amyloidosis (APPKM670/671NL/PSEN1Δexon9) recapitulates the expected network characteristics by normalizing the transcriptome of APP/PSEN1 mice and repressing the induction of genes involved in the switch from homeostatic microglia to disease-associated microglia (DAM), including Trem2, complement (C1qa, C1qb, C1qc, Itgax), Clec7a and Cst7. Importantly, we show that constitutive absence of TYROBP/DAP12 in the amyloidosis mouse model prevented appearance of the electrophysiological and learning behavior alterations associated with the phenotype of APPKM670/671NL/PSEN1Δexon9 mice. Our results suggest that TYROBP/DAP12 could represent a novel therapeutic target to slow, arrest, or prevent the development of sporadic LOAD. These data establish that the network pathology observed in postmortem human LOAD brain can be faithfully recapitulated in the brain of a genetically manipulated mouse. These data also validate our multiscale gene networks by demonstrating how the networks intersect with the standard neuropathological features of LOAD.
Introduction
Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified two dozen genes that can be associated with causation or increased risk for sporadic late onset Alzheimer’s disease (hereafter referred as LOAD)1–3, the major cause of late-life brain failure in humans4. Large GWAS datasets1–3 point to molecules in one of three general classes: (1) microglial or immune-inflammatory genes; (2) protein processing and/or sorting genes; or (3) lipid- or lipoprotein-related genes. Such datasets indicate many of the molecules that can be prominently perturbed in LOAD5–16. Bioinformatic analysis of genome-wide RNA expression provides insights into biological pathways that regulate cellular processes and disease progression at the molecular level and is widely applied to investigate the pathogenesis of familial AD (FAD) and LOAD in mouse models and in human postmortem brain5–17. Gene co-expression network analysis approaches capture interactions among genes and identify higher order network structures, e.g. modules comprising highly interconnected genes5–16. Zhang et al.5 performed a multiscale gene network analysis (MNA) combining neuropathology, whole-genome genotyping, and gene-expression profiling of human brain specimens from visual cortex (VC), dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (PFC), and cerebellum (CB) from 376 AD patients and 173 non-demented controls. MNA revealed many facets of the molecular-interaction structures in AD and formally rank-ordered gene subnetworks based on their relevance to AD pathological and clinical traits. One such subnetwork highlighted complement cascade-related molecules, and the key complement subnetwork driver was TYROBP (also known as DAP12), a phagocytosis-related, microglial-enriched, phosphotyrosine phosphoprotein that forms functional complexes with, among others, TREM2 and the complement receptor CR318–22. In addition to its identity as a subnetwork driver, loss-of-function mutant forms of TYROBP lead to Nasu-Hakola disease (NHD)23 while rare missense forms may result in familial AD (FAD)24. Beyond the association of TYROBP with LOAD and FAD, TREM2 and CR3 have well-documented interactions with amyloid peptide (Aβ), complement, and synapses25–27. Notably, there exists an important phenomenon whereby oligomeric forms of Aβ trigger the engulfment of synaptic structures via a CR3-dependent process27. Perhaps because both CR3 and TYROBP are obligatory participants in this phenomenon, mice deficient in either C3 (the ligand for CR3) or TYROBP are relatively resistant to Aβ-induced behavioral and electrophysiological pathology even at the young age of 4 months26,28.
We sought to validate in vivo in mice the driver role of TYROBP in LOAD and to demonstrate that the manipulation of Tyrobp leads to changes in subnetworks that mimic the changes observed in the brain in human LOAD. We previously demonstrated that 4-month-old transgenic APPKM670/671NL/PSEN1Δexon9 (hereafter abbreviated as APP/PSEN1) mice on a Tyrobp-null (Tyrobp−/−) background had no apparent changes in the transcription of the constituents of the complement subnetwork28. Since all forms of AD are age-related, we performed the identical battery of molecular, behavioral, electrophysiological, and transcriptomic analyses in 8-month-old mice. As observed in 4-month-old mice, TYROBP deficiency played a protective effect in behavior and electrophysiology in 8-month-old mice. However, unlike the 4-month-old mice, we observed that the levels of the transcripts comprising nearly the entire Tyrobp-driven complement subnetwork were reduced. Therefore, constitutive Tyrobp knockout in the brain of a mouse with Aβ-amyloid deposits, recapitulates, in an aging-related manner, the complement subnetwork first observed in human LOAD brain5. As one would expect, the transcriptomic subnetwork and hub that were associated with increased expression in LOAD brain were associated with reduced representation in the APP/PSEN1;Tyrobp−/− brain.
This is the first direct observation that the complement transcriptome subnetwork molecules predicted from integrative models of human postmortem LOAD brain can be recapitulated in a cerebral amyloidosis mouse model. Moreover, the levels of network component transcripts are reversed in a mouse in which the predicted driver has been knocked out. The ability of a single subnetwork hub/driver to prevent the appearance of the typical behavioral and electrophysiological phenotypes of the APP/PSEN1 mouse while recapitulating the predicted subnetwork characteristics can now serve as a biological template for designing, screening, and repurposing molecular interventions in an effort to identify a biologic or a small molecule drug capable of mimicking the profile of the 8-month-old, Aβ-amyloid-depositing, Tyrobp knockout mouse. Our prediction is that drugs identified in this manner may be useful in the prevention or treatment of LOAD.
Methods
Animals.
The experimental procedures were conducted in accordance with NIH guidelines for animal research and were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) at Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai. All mice were on a C57Bl6/J background. APPKM670/671NL/PSEN1Δexon9(=APP/PSEN1)29, Tyrobp-null or knockout (Tyrobp−/−)30 were obtained from Jackson Laboratories and Taconic/Merck Laboratory respectively. APP/PSEN1 were crossed with Tyrobp−/− mice to obtain APP/PSEN1;Tyrobp+/−. APP/PSEN1;Tyrobp+/− were then crossed with Tyrobp+/− to obtain WT, Tyrobp+/−, Tyrobp−/−, APP/PSEN1, APP/PSEN1;Tyrobp+/− or APP/PSEN1;Tyrobp−/− mice. 8-month-old male and female mice were sacrificed by decapitation. One hemisphere was collected and immersion-fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for immunohistochemistry analysis. The other hemisphere was dissected and prefrontal cortex (PFC) was collected for transcriptomic analysis. PFC and hemibrain were then snap-frozen and stored at −80°C prior to RNA isolation or biochemistry analysis. A standard number of mice (4-5 per group and 4-5 per sex) were used for most of the analyses as this size gives us 80% power to see differences of effect size of at least 2.5 between groups at α= 0.05. An increased standard number of mice were used per group and per sex for behavioral and electrophysiological analyses as these analyses are often variable (sample size “n” is specified in the figure legend).
RNA isolation.
Snap frozen samples from the PFC of male and female mice were homogenized in QIAzol Lysis Reagent (Qiagen). Total RNA purification was performed with the miRNeasy Mini kit (Qiagen). RNA quantification and quality were evaluated by Agilent BioAnalyzer. RNA integrity was checked using the RNA 6000 Nano assay (Agilent, CA, USA). All processed RNA samples had RQN/RIN value of 8.4 or greater.
RT-qPCR.
500ng of total RNAs were reversed using the High-Capacity RNA-to-cDNA Kit (Applied Biosystem, Foster city, CA, USA). cDNAs were subjected to real-time qPCR in a StepOne Plus system (Applied Biosystem) using The All-in-One qPCR Mix (GeneCopoeia, Rockville, MD, USA). qPCR consisted of 40 cycles, 10s at 95°C, 20s at 60°C and 15s at 70°C each, followed by dissociation curve analysis. Ct values were normalized to the expression level of L32 and relative gene expression was calculated using the ΔΔCt method31. Sequences of primers used: C1q: Fwd5’-GCATCCAGTTTGATCGGACC-3’; Rev5’-GCTCCCCTCTCTCTCCTTTG-3’ L32: Fwd5’-GAAACTGGCGGAAACCCA-3’; Rev5’-GGATCTGGCCCTTGAACCTT-3’
RNA sequencing.
Total RNAs from PFC of 8-month-old male WT (n=4), Tyrobp+/− (n=3), Tyrobp−/−(n=4), APP/PSEN1 (n=4), APP/PSEN1;Tyrobp+/− (n=4) or APP/PSEN1;Tyrobp−/− (n=5) mice were subjected to RNA sequencing. The sequencing library was prepared with the TruSeq RNA Sample Prep Kit v2 protocol (Illumina, CA, USA). Ribosomal RNAs were removed using the Ribo-Zero rRNA Removal Kit (Human/Mouse/Rat) (Illumina, CA, USA). Remaining RNAs were fragmented, and the cDNAs synthesized using random hexamers, end-repaired, and ligated with appropriate adaptors for sequencing. The library was processed for size selection and purification using AMPure XP beads (Beckman Coulter, CA, USA). The appropriate Illumina-recommended 6bp barcode bases were introduced at one end of the adaptors during the PCR amplification step. The size and concentration of the RNA-seq libraries were measured by Bioanalyzer and Qubit fluorometry (Life Technologies, NY, USA) before loading onto the sequencer. The rRNA-depleted libraries were sequenced on the Illumina HiSeq 2500 System with 100 nucleotide single-end reads (Illumina, CA, USA).
Differential Expression Analysis and gene set enrichment analysis.
The single-ended raw sequencing reads were aligned to mouse mm10 genome using Star aligner (version 2.5.0b). FeatureCounts was used to quantify gene expression at the gene level based on UCSC gene model. Genes with at least 1 count per million (CPM) in at least one sample were considered expressed and retained for further analysis. The gene level read count data were normalized using trimmed mean of M-values normalization (TMM) method32 to adjust for sequencing library size difference. Differential gene expression between groups was predicted by a linear model analysis using Bioconductor package limma33. To adjust for multiple tests, the false discovery rate (FDR) of the differential expression test was estimated using the Benjamini-Hochberg method34. Gene set enrichments were calculated using Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA).
Network analysis using human AD postmortem brain gene expression data.
We utilized large-scale postmortem brain RNA sequencing data from two human AD cohorts (MSBB6,35 and ROSMAP36) to build gene co-expression networks and Bayesian causal networks to model the regulation of gene expression traits in brain samples. The ROSMAP and MSBB RNA-seq data and associated genomics data are available in the Accelerating Medicines Partnership in AD (AMP-AD) Knowledge Portal at Synapse (https://www.synapse.org/#!Synapse:syn2580853) upon authentication by the AMP-AD Consortium. We downloaded normalized RNA-seq gene expression abundance data from Synapse. Genes expressed in at least 10% of the samples were selected, and the data were corrected for confounding factors including batch, PMI, sex, and RIN score. The construction of gene co-expression networks and Bayesian networks is detailed in supplementary methods.
Immunohistochemistry.
30 μm thick sagittal free-floating sections were incubated with anti-Iba1 (1:500, cat#019-19741, Wako, Richmond, VA, USA), 6E10 (1:1000, cat#9320-500, Covance, Princeton, NJ, USA), or C1q (1:1000, cat#ab182451, Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA) antibodies. Sections probed with Iba1 and 6E10 antibodies were incubated with anti-rabbit Alexa 488 (1:400, cat#A-11008, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Grand Island, NY, USA) and anti-mouse Alexa 594 (1:400, cat#A-11005, Thermo Fisher Scientific) secondary antibodies. Sections probed with C1q were incubated with biotinylated anti-mouse antibody (1:1000, BA-9200, Vector laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA) and developed with Vectastain ABC Kit (PK-4000, Vector Laboratories). (see suppl. methods for details). Images were acquired using an Olympus BX61 microscope or a Pannoramic 250 digital scanner (3DHISTECH, Budapest, Hungary).
For measuring percentage of 6E10 immunoreactive areas, 6E10-immunolabeled sections were thresholded and the percentage of 6E10 positive area was calculated using Fiji (v2.0.0) and the “measure” function. For measuring microglial number, Iba1 positive cells in the region of interest (ROI) were manually counted and number was normalized to the area of the ROI. ROI (prefrontal cortex, hippocampus) were determined and outlined by manual tracing.
Western Blot.
30μg of protein lysates prepared from hemibrains homogenized in RIPA buffer were loaded in Criterion XT 4-20% Bis-Tris gels and transferred onto PVDF membrane (0.45μm; Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA). Membranes were probed with anti-C1q antibody (1:1000, cat#ab182451, Abcam) and subsequently incubated with anti-rabbit HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies (1:2000, cat#PI-1000, Vector laboratories). Normalization was achieved using GAPDH. Membranes were probed with anti-GAPDH antibody (1:5000, cat#sc32233, Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, USA) and subsequently incubated with anti-mouse HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies (1:2000, cat#PI-2000, Vector laboratories). Membranes were developed with ECL Western blotting substrate (Pierce, Rockford, IL, USA) using the Fujifilm LAS-3000 developer (Stamford, CT, USA). Integrated density of immunoreactive bands were measured using MultiGauge Software (FujiFilm). (see suppl. methods for details)
Aß assays and oligomer epitope characterization.
Samples were processed as previously described28,37,38. Hemibrains were processed via serial detergent fractionation with ultracentrifugation to produce TBS-soluble, Triton-X-soluble and formic-acid-soluble Aβ fractions (suppl. Figure 5a and suppl. methods for detailed serial detergent fractionation method). For analysis of native oligomeric Aβ protein structure, 2μl protein samples from the TBS-soluble fraction were spotted onto activated PVDF membrane (0.22μm; Millipore). Membranes were incubated with either rabbit pAb A11 (anti-prefibrillar oligomers; 0.5μg/ml; gift from Charles Glabe, University of California Irvine), rabbit pAb OC (anti-fibrillar oligomers and fibrils; 0.25μg/ml; gift from Charles Glabe) or mouse mAb NU-4 (anti-oligomers; 1μg/ml; gift from William Klein, Northwestern University)28,39,40. Generation, purification, and characterization of A11, OC and NU-4 have been described previously39,40. Membranes were incubated with appropriate anti-mouse or -rabbit HRP-conjugated secondary antibody (1:20,000; Vector laboratories) and developed as described in the western blot section. Normalization to total APP/Aβ signal was achieved by detection of human APP transgene metabolites with the anti-Aß antibody 6E10 (1:1000, Covance).
To quantify Aβ42 and Aβ40 levels, human/rat Aβ1–40/1–42 ELISA kits (Wako, Richmond, VA) were used according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Absolute concentrations of total or oligomeric Aβ were normalized to initial tissue weight.
Field electrophysiology.
Coronal brain slices containing the hippocampal formation were prepared as previously described28,41. Animals were anesthetized with isoflurane and brains were rapidly removed from the skull and placed in an ice-cold modified ACSF solution (215mM sucrose, 2.5mM KCl, 1.6mM NaH2PO4, 4mM MgSO4, 1mM CaCl2, 4mM MgCl2, 20mM glucose, 26mM NaHCO3, pH=7.4,). Coronal brain slices (400μm thick) were prepared with a Vibratome VT1000S (Leica Microsystems) and then incubated at room temperature for ≥3h in a physiologic ACSF (120mM NaCl, 3.3mM KCl, 1.2mM Na2HPO4, 26mM NaHCO3, 1.3mM MgSO4, 1.8mM CaCl2, 11mM Glucose, pH=7.4). The hemi-slices were transferred to a recording chamber perfused with ACSF at a flow rate of ~2mL/min using a peristaltic pump; experiments were performed at 28.0±0.1°C. Recordings were acquired with a GeneClamp 500B amplifier (Axon Instruments) and Digidata 1440A (Molecular Devices). All signals were low-pass filtered at 2kHz and digitized at 10kHz. Field recordings were obtained using a patch-type pipette filled with ACSF and placed in the middle third of stratum radiatum in area CA1. Field excitatory postsynaptic potentials (fEPSPs) were evoked by activating the Shaffer collaterals with a concentric bipolar electrode placed in the middle third of stratum radiatum 150–200μm away from the recording pipette (Figure 5a). Square-wave current pulses (60ms pulse width) were delivered through a constant-current stimulus isolator (Isoflex, AMPI). Input-output curves were generated by a series of stimuli ranging from 30-80μA. Paired-pulse facilitation (PPF) was measured by delivering two stimuli at 20, 50 and 100ms interstimulus intervals. Each interstimulus interval was repeated 3 times and the resulting potentials were averaged. The paired-pulse ratio was calculated by dividing the slope of the second EPSP by the slope of the first EPSP. All results were analyzed by ANOVAs followed by Tukey post-hoc tests. Baseline recordings (stable for 20min) were made every 30s using stimuli that yielded a response equal to 50% of spike threshold. For long-term potentiation (LTP) and long-term depressions (LTD) experiments, synaptic strength was measured by EPSP slope with stimuli that yielded a response equal to 30-40% of spike threshold, delivered every 30s. LTP was induced after 20 minutes of stable baseline recording with theta burst stimulation, consisting of a series of 10 bursts of 4 stimuli (100Hz within the burst, 200ms interburst interval) repeated 4 times (10s apart) and delivered at an intensity giving a baseline response equal to 75% of spike threshold. LTD was induced after 20min of stable baseline recordings by bath application of (RS)-dihydroxyphenylglycine (DHPG; 100μM), a selective mGluR1/mGluR5 agonist, for 5min. fEPSPs were collected for at least 60min during DHPG washout.
Barnes Maze.
The Barnes Maze test42,43 consists of a rotatable circular platform (1.22m in diameter and 1m from the floor) with 20 holes in periphery. A removable box was placed underneath one of the holes for escape, and visual cues were placed on the walls of the room. Mice were transported from their cages to the center of the platform via a closed starting chamber where they remained for 10s prior to exploring the maze for 3min. Mice failing to enter the escape box within 3min were guided to the escape box by the experimenter, and the latency was counted as 180s. Mice were allowed to remain in the escape box for 1 min before the next trial. 2 trials per day were performed on 4 consecutive days. The platform and the escape box were wiped with 70% ethanol after each trial to eliminate the use of olfactory cues to locate the target hole. All trials were recorded by video camera and analyzed with ANY-maze video tracking software (Stoelting Co, Wood Dale, USA).
Statistics.
Graphs represent the mean of all samples in each group±SEM. n values and statistical tests are indicated in figure legends. Shapiro-Wilk normality tests were used. Analyses used include one-way ANOVA, two-way ANOVA and Mann-Whitney tests. Significance is set at p-value≤0.05. No mice were excluded for RNAsequencing analysis. For biochemical, histological, behavioral, and electrophysiological analyses, outliers were detected using Grubbs’s test (extreme studentized deviate method) with α=0.05. Investigators were blinded to sample identity for behavioral, electrophysiological, and histological analyses. Sequencing library and RNAsequencing were performed by the Genomics Core Facility at Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai. Samples were assayed with operators blinded to sample identity (e.g., genotype).
Data and Software availability.
Gene expression data has been deposited electronically to the Synapse Web Portal (https://www.synapse.org, accession number syn10378730) in accordance with data sharing policies established by the NIH AMP-AD consortium. Specific software will also be made available upon request.
Results
In order to validate in vivo in mice the driver role of TYROBP in sporadic LOAD and to demonstrate that the manipulation of TYROBP level leads to molecular changes observed human LOAD, we performed a battery of molecular, behavioral, electrophysiological analyses, and generated transcriptomic profiles in 8-month-old WT and APP/PSEN1 mice that were either WT, heterozygous- or homozygous-null for Tyrobp (Suppl. Figure 1).
TYROBP is upregulated in human sporadic LOAD postmortem samples.
We evaluated TYROBP gene expression at different stages of LOAD in a large-scale postmortem brain transcriptomic dataset from the Mount Sinai Brain Bank (MSBB) AD cohort6,35. In all 4 brain regions profiled with RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) from this cohort, TYROBP mRNA was upregulated by at least 1.2-fold in the demented subjects compared to the non-demented controls (p<0.05) (Suppl. Figure 2). We confirmed the disease-associated up-regulation of TYROBP in brains in a second large postmortem brain RNA-seq dataset from the ROSMAP AD cohort (1.1-fold, p=0.02) (data not shown).
In an APP/PSEN1 mouse, constitutive absence of TYROBP prevents the expression of pro-inflammatory and microglial sporadic LOAD associated genes.
We generated transcriptomic profiles of 24 PFC samples from 8-month-old male WT and APP/PSEN1 mice that were either WT, or heterozygous- or homozygous-null for Tyrobp (n=3-5 samples per group). At an FDR of 0.05, Tyrobp was the only differentially expressed gene (DEG) in heterozygous-null mice in comparison to WT and APP/PSEN1 mice, indicating that in a WT or pathological (APP/PSEN1) background, deletion of one allele of Tyrobp does not induce a significant transcriptomic change at a 5% FDR (Figure 1a). The Tyrobp homozygous-null transcriptome contained 20 DEGs in comparison to WT mice. Among them, 5 were upregulated and 15 were downregulated (Figure 1a). These results are consistent with our previous report in 4-month-old mice showing that deficiency or absence of TYROBP in a WT background without immune stimulation perturbs expression of only a limited number of genes28 (Suppl. Figure 3a).
We next evaluated the changes of the transcriptome in the APP/PSEN1 mouse model and identified 181 DEGs in comparison to WT (Figure 1a). Over 90% of the identified DEGs were upregulated (165 upregulated; 16 downregulated genes). Among the most significantly upregulated genes, we observed several LOAD-associated genes, including Trem2, Tyrobp, C1q, Itgax (aka CD11c), Cst7, Clec7a and Gfap (Figure 1a, see Suppl. Table 1 for full DEGs results) highlighting the induction of immune response components in the 8-month-old APP/PSEN1 mice.
To evaluate the effect of the absence of TYROBP on the transcriptome of the APP/PSEN1 mice, we compared the transcriptomes of APP/PSEN1 mice homozygous-null for Tyrobp against APP/PSEN1 mice with homozygous WT Tyrobp and identified 116 DEGs (Figure 1a). Contrary to the above comparison (APP/PSEN1 vs. WT), the majority of DEGs were downregulated (10 upregulated; 106 downregulated genes). Notably, there was a decrease in the expression of Trem2, multiple complement-related genes (C1qa, C1qb, C1qc, Itgax), Cst7, and several chemokines (Ccl4, Ccl6, Ccl9 and Ccl3l3) (Figure 1a, Suppl. Table 1).
We calculated the proportion of genes that were shared in the different comparisons (Figure 1c). There were 86 shared genes between the comparisons APP/PSEN1 vs. WT and APP/PSEN1;Tyrobp−/− vs. APP/PSEN1 [FET p= 6.6e-161, 76.1 fold enrichment (FE)]. Strikingly, these genes were upregulated in the brains of cerebral amyloidosis mice and downregulated in those of cerebral amyloidosis mice with Tyrobp KO (Figure 1b, Suppl. Figure 3c). The 86 genes included a number of key genes involved in the switch from homeostatic microglia to disease-associated microglia (DAM), including Trem2, Itgax, Ctsd, Cst7, Clec7a, Ccl6, Cd68 and Selplg44 (Suppl. Figure 3c). In addition, the absence of TYROBP in the APP/PSEN1 background also decreased the expression of Irf8 and Irf5, two important transcription factors regulating pro-inflammatory cytokine expression45,46.
Given the apparent decreased expression of nearly 50% of the upregulated DEGs associated with the APP/PSEN1 mice, we next compared the transcriptome of APP/PSEN1;Tyrobp−/− mice vs. WT mice. We identified 55 DEGs (25 up; 30 down), substantially fewer than the 181 DEGs between APP/PSEN1 vs. WT (Figure 1a). Notably, expression of several chemokines, transcription factors, and DAM genes increased in APP/PSEN1 mice vs. WT were normalized in APP/PSEN1;Tyrobp−/− mice vs. WT (Figure 1a, Suppl. table 1). Accordingly, comparison of the transcriptome of APP/PSEN1;Tyrobp−/− mice vs. Tyrobp−/− mice reported a limited number of DEGs (12 DEGs; 9 up; 3 down) (Figure 1a, Suppl. table 1). While the absence of TYROBP in the APP/PSEN1 did not normalize the expression of the astrocytic genes C4b and Gfap vs. WT or Tyrobp−/−, our data suggest that the absence of TYROBP in the APP/PSEN1 mouse model substantially decreases the induction of the pro-inflammatory immune response observed in the brains of APP/PSEN1 mice.
Constitutive absence of TYROBP prevents dysregulation of the major AD-related complement transcriptomic subnetwork.
To identify biological pathways that may be dysregulated in WT and APP/PSEN1 mice WT or KO for TYROBP, we performed gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) using Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) (Figure 2). We first sought to identify the pathways that were specifically dysregulated in the 8-month-old amyloidosis mouse model and performed GSEA on the list of genes that were differentially expressed in the APP/PSEN1 mice in comparison to WT mice (FDR<0.05). At −log(FDR)>1.3, 56 canonical pathways were dysregulated in the APP/PSEN1 vs. WT mice, several of which were associated with immune response and glial cell activation (Figure 2a for selected canonical pathways, see Suppl. table 2 for full results of canonical pathway analyses). Top dysregulated pathways included phagosome formation and maturation, neuroinflammation signaling, complement system, dendritic cell maturation, production of nitric oxide (NO) and reactive oxygen species (ROS), and IL-10 and IL-8 signaling. A list of DEGs associated with selected dysregulated pathways is presented in Figure 2b. Prediction of the activation state revealed activation of several pathways including neuroinflammation signaling, TREM1 signaling, production of NO and ROS, and complement system in the APP/PSEN1 mice vs. WT mice (−log(FDR)>1.3 and z-score >2) (Figure 2c, Suppl. table 2). The apoptosis signaling pathway was predicted to be decreased in the APP/PSEN1 mice (−log(FDR)>1.3 and z-score <−2). This pathway was driven by an increased expression of antiapoptotic genes (Naip3, Naip5 and Bcl2a1b and d) implicated in inflammasome activation or upregulated during inflammatory processes47,48.
We next performed GSEA on the list of DEGs in APP/PSEN1;Tyrobp−/− vs. APP/PSEN1 mice (FDR<0.05). 32 canonical pathways were dysregulated (−log(FDR)>1.3). This number is substantially higher than our previous report in APP/PSEN1;Tyrobp−/− vs. APP/PSEN1 mice at 4 month-old (Suppl. Figure 3b). Complement system, phagosome formation and production of NO and ROS were the most significantly dysregulated in the APP/PSEN1 KO for TYROBP vs. APP/PSEN1 WT for TYROBP (−log(FDR)= 5.32, 4.58 and 3.45, respectively). Contrary to the previous comparison, prediction of the activation state showed down-regulation of pathways associated with immune response and glial cell activation (e.g. neuroinflammation signaling pathway, Trem1 signaling, dendritic cell maturation, IL-8 signaling, and production of NO and ROS in macrophages) (−log(FDR)>1.3 and z-score <=−2) (Figure 2c, Suppl. table 2).
We analyzed whether these apparent beneficial effects of the absence of TYROBP on the cerebral amyloidosis transcriptome could decrease the number of perturbed canonical pathways observed in the APP/PSEN1 mice vs. WT. Only seven pathways were significantly dysregulated in APP/PSEN1;Tyrobp−/− vs. WT (−log(FDR)>1.3), 5 of them being related to cholesterol metabolism (superpathway of cholesterol biosynthesis, cholesterol biosynthesis I, II and III, and epoxysqualene biosynthesis) and two of the dysregulated pathways were involved in inositol biosynthesis and metabolism (D-myo-inositol (1,4,5)-trisphosphate biosynthesis, superpathway of inositol phosphate compounds) (Figure 2a, Suppl. table 2). Importantly, all canonical pathways activated in the brains of APP/PSEN1 mice vs. WT (z-score>2) were normalized in APP/PSEN1;Tyrobp−/− vs. WT (Figure 2c). GSEA in the APP/PSEN1;Tyrobp−/− mice vs. Tyrobp−/− mice reported 9 dysregulated pathways. However, considering the limited number of DEGs in this comparison (12 DEGs), the importance of the dysregulations is unclear. No canonical pathways were significantly dysregulated in the Tyrobp−/− vs. WT mice.
These results demonstrate that the absence of TYROBP reduces the perturbations of the transcriptome observed in the brains of APP/PSEN1 mice and alleviates the induction of the immune/pro-inflammatory response observed in the APP/PSEN1 mouse brain.
Absence of TYROBP decreased the induction of C1q expression in APP/PSEN1.
The complement system plays an important role in the pathogenesis of AD26,27,49. In our transcriptomic analysis, absence of TYROBP in APP/PSEN1 mice alleviates the increased expression of several central complement components associated with APP and/or PSEN1 mutations. We assessed by qPCR, western blot and immunostaining the expression of C1q, the initiating protein of the classical complement cascade, in male and female APP/PSEN1 mice WT or null for Tyrobp at 8 months of age (Suppl. Figure 4). Consistent with the RNAseq results, mRNA level of C1q was increased in the APP/PSEN1 mice as compare to WT mice and was normalized in APP/PSEN1;Tyrobp−/− (Suppl. Figure 4a). Western blot and immunostaining confirmed the decreased C1q expression in APP/PSEN1;Tyrobp−/− mice as compared to that of APP/PSEN1 mice (Suppl. Figure 4b-d).
Brain network signatures in APP/PSEN1 mice are enriched for human sporadic LOAD network signatures.
We intersected the APP/PSEN1 mouse signature (APP/PSEN1 versus WT) with multiple LOAD brain gene expression signatures previously identified in human brains. Suppl. Table 3 summarizes the source of the human LOAD gene signatures and the intersection analysis results obtained from the Fisher’s exact test (FET). Genes upregulated in the brains of APP/PSEN1 mice were significantly enriched for genes upregulated in CA1 of the hippocampus (4.1-fold, adjusted P value 6.1×10−4) or CA3 (3.3-fold, adjusted P value 8.1×10−4) of LOAD brains as identified by Miller et al50. Meanwhile, genes upregulated in APP/PSEN1 mouse brains were also significantly enriched for genes positively correlated with the Braak score in the PFC region of the Harvard Brain Tissue Resource Center (HBTRC) cohort (2.4-fold, adjusted P value 1.6×10−3)6. The genes downregulated in the brains of APP/PSEN1 mice were not enriched in human AD signatures, perhaps at least partially attributable to the limited number of downregulated genes identified in the current study.
TYROBP knockout signatures are enriched in TYROBP regulated networks in human LOAD brains.
TYROBP was identified as a network key driver implicated in LOAD based on the Bayesian causal regulatory network analysis in the HBTRC expression dataset8. We overlaid the Tyrobp-null signature detected in APP/PSEN1 mice (APP/PSEN1;Tyrobp−/− vs. APP/PSEN1) onto the HBTRC Bayesian network and found enrichment of downregulated genes in the first 4 layers downstream of TYROBP (up to 29.4-fold; FET P value 3.5×10−7 ~ 1.2×10−33), thus validating the TYROBP-centered regulatory network (Figure 3). One key output of the NIH AMP-AD program has been RNA-seq datasets from over 1,000 human brain tissues across multiple brain regions, generated from individual LOAD cohorts, including the aforementioned MSBB and ROSMAP. This allowed us to build new Bayesian networks from each individual brain region and combine them with the HBTRC networks to create a more comprehensive causal network, termed union Bayesian network (see Suppl. Text). In this union Bayesian network, we observed a stronger enrichment of downregulated genes by deletion of Tyrobp in the first 4 layers of the network neighborhood of TYROBP (FET P value 3.6×10−15, 5.0×10−48, 2.7×10−51, and 7.7×10−23 accordingly). For example, in the first-layer neighborhood of TYROBP, there was a 70-fold enrichment and one third of the 27 first-layer neighbor genes were downregulated by the deficit of TYROBP in APP/PSEN1 mice (FET P value 3.6×10−15). Figure 3 shows the network topology of the up to 3-layer network neighborhood around TYROBP. The validated network genes included TREM2, a prominent LOAD GWAS gene, and complement component subunits includingC1QA and C1QB. In addition to TREM2, we found 5 other LOAD GWAS hits in this subnetwork including APOE, the MS4A locus, CD33, INPP5D, and the HLA locus. Unlike TREM2, the expression of these GWAS genes was not altered by deletion of Tyrobp. As expected, the upregulated genes in the brains of APP/PSEN1 mice were also significantly enriched in the neighbors of TYROBP (9.9-fold, FET P value 4.3×10−71; Suppl. Figure 5). In summary, this causal network analysis shows that the human LOAD causal networks are highly predictive of the Tyrobp-null murine signature.
We further intersected the present mouse gene signatures with co-expression network modules identified across multiple human LOAD datasets. As summarized in Suppl. Table 4 , the genes upregulated in APP/PSEN1 mice were significantly enriched in human immune response modules. Meanwhile, Tyrobp−/− signatures in APP/PSEN1 mice were also enriched in the same human immune response modules. Many of these immune response modules were highly associated with AD pathology, including the top module “yellow” in the PFC co-expression network from the HBTRC data in which TYROBP was a module member5. The result suggests that Tyrobp modulates the immune response pathways which are activated by transgenic expression of APP/PSEN1.
Constitutive deletion of Tyrobp does not alter amyloid burden in 8-month-old APP/PSEN1 mice.
We assessed whether the absence of TYROBP would modulate Aß deposition in the PFC and hippocampus (HC) of male and female APP/PSEN1 mice. The area covered by 6E10 immunoreactive plaques was unchanged by the deletion of Tyrobp in APP/PSEN1 mice (Figure 4a-c). We and others previously reported decreased microglial clustering around the Aß plaques in Tyrobp−/− mice with Aß pathology28,51. We observed this same phenomenon in the 8-month-old APP/PSEN1;Tyrobp−/− as compared to APP/PSEN1 mice with normal levels of TYROBP (Figure 4a, b). We then asked whether reduced clustering of microglia around plaques in the APP/PSEN1 mice null for Tyrobp was due to a reduction in the total number of brain microglia, as observed in Trem2−/− mice with Aß pathology51,52. Iba1 immunostaining in 8-month-old APP/PSEN1 mice null for Tyrobp did not show differences in the total number of microglia in cortex or hippocampus as compared to APP/PSEN1 mice with normal levels of TYROBP (Figure 4d).
Constitutive absence of TYROBP is associated with elevated levels of soluble Aß but reduced levels of insoluble Aß in 8-month-old APP/PSEN1 mice
We assessed whether the absence of TYROBP would modulate levels of Aß species in APP/PSEN1 mice. We measured levels of Aß40 and Aß42 in TBS, Triton-X, and formic acid soluble Aß fractions from brains of 8-month-old male and female APP/PSEN1 mice WT or null for Tyrobp (Suppl. Figure 6a). In both males and females, absence of TYROBP was associated with increased levels of Aß40 and Aß42 in the most soluble fraction (TBS) (Suppl. Figure 6b,c). While not statistically significant, a trend toward a decreased Aß42/40 ratio was observed in the APP/PSEN1;Tyrobp−/− mice as compared to APP/PSEN1 mice. This effect was more obvious in females than in males (p-value=0.0635 and p-value=0.2587 respectively) (Suppl. Figure 6d). Conversely, levels of both Aß40 and Aß42 were reduced in the Triton-X fraction as compared to APP/PSEN1 mice with normal levels of TYROBP (Suppl. Figure 6e,f) without any change in the Aß42/40 ratio (Suppl. Figure 6g). The levels of Aß40 and Aß42 did not change in the formic acid fraction (Suppl. Figure 6h,i), but Aß40 levels trended lower in APP/PSEN1;Tyrobp−/− mice as compared to sex-matched APP/PSEN1 mice leading to an increased Aß42/40 ratio in the APP/PSEN1;Tyrobp−/− mice. Notably and in accordance with our previous results28,53, female APP/PSEN1 mice WT or null for Tyrobp had higher levels of Aß40 and 42 in the formic acid fractions when compared to genotype-matched males.
We next assayed oligomeric Aß peptides using antibodies NU-4, A11, and OC antibodies to distinguish among Aß conformers (Suppl. Figure 6k-m), which have been correlated with impaired cognitive performances in humans and mice54. At 8 months of age, the absence of TYROBP played no obvious role in determining levels of NU-4-, A11-, or OC-epitope-containing oligomeric Aß.
Deletion of Tyrobp ameliorates aberrant synaptic plasticity in APP/PSEN1 mouse hippocampus
Synaptic plasticity is abnormal in the hippocampus of APP/PSEN1 mice55, and in 4-month-old mice, we found that Tyrobp deletion partially rescued the normal synaptic phenotype28. In hippocampal slices from 8-month-old mice, basal transmission at CA3-CA1 synapses was significantly enhanced in Tyrobp−/− and APP/PSEN1;Tyrobp−/− mice as compared to WT controls, while APP/PSEN1 mice did not differ from WT controls (Figure 5b). We examined a short-term form of presynaptic plasticity, paired-pulse facilitation (PPF), which is inversely related to glutamate release probability56. At 4 months, PPF was depressed in APP/PSEN1 mice and was fully rescued by deletion of Tyrobp28. At 8 months, PPF was depressed in APP/PSEN1 mice at an interpulse interval of 20ms and was normalized by deletion of Tyrobp (Figure 5c). Absence of TYROBP in WT background did not affect the PFF. We also studied two long-term forms of synaptic plasticity: synaptically-induced long-term potentiation (LTP), and DHPG-induced long-term depression (LTD). LTP was similar in the four genotypes [WT, Tyrobp−/−, APP/PSEN1, and APP/PSEN1;Tyrobp−/−] (Figure 5d). However, LTD was markedly reduced in slices from APP/PSEN1 mice, and this deficit was fully rescued by deletion of Tyrobp (Figure 5e). Of note, absence of TYROBP in WT background did not affect LTD. These results establish that as late as 8 months of age, deletion of mouse Tyrobp prevents the development of electrophysiological abnormalities that are present in a model of cerebral amyloidosis.
Constitutive deletion of Tyrobp prevents impaired performance in Barnes maze learning and memory in APP/PSEN1 mice
We previously concluded that deletion of Tyrobp can slow or delay the progression of learning deficits in APP/PSEN1 transgenic mice during the early stages of amyloid deposition28. In the current study, we probed the effect of the absence of TYROBP on spatial learning and memory using the Barnes Maze Test in 8-month-old WT, Tyrobp−/−, APP/PSEN1, and APP/PSEN1;Tyrobp−/− mice (Figure 5f). The percentage of distance traveled in the target quadrant (TQ) and the latency to find the hidden zone were identical between Tyrobp−/− mice and WT mice suggesting that deficiency of TYROBP did not have a deleterious effect on learning and memory in a WT background. APP/PSEN1 mice showed impairment of learning and memory relative to WT mice with a shorter distance traveled in the TQ and increased latency to find the hidden zone as compare to WT mice (Figure 5g,h). Absence of TYROBP in APP/PSEN1 mice was associated with improved learning and memory relative to APP/PSEN1 with WT TYROBP levels. Thus, percentage of distance traveled in the TQ and latency to find the hidden zone were similar in APP/PSEN1;Tyrobp−/− and WT littermates. These data are consistent with a beneficial effect of Tyrobp deletion on learning and memory deficits associated with APP/PSEN1 mutations.
Discussion
Despite decades of intensive research, the pathogenesis of LOAD remains elusive, and therapeutic interventions focused on reduction of Aß accumulation have failed to provide meaningful clinical benefits. Multiscale network modeling of large-scale functional genomics data creates novel opportunities to identify key targets causally linked to LOAD, thereby offering new insights for drug-discovery programs. We previously constructed a molecular network based on whole-genome gene-expression profiling and genotyping data on 1,647 autopsied brain tissues from LOAD and nondemented subjects and reported the first LOAD causal network centered on TYROBP8. In the computational model, TYROBP lies at the center of the complement system subnetwork, and, based on its predicted role as a hub and driver of the complement subnetwork, we predicted that changes in the level of TYROBP would lead to similar changes in the expression level of genes in that network.
Herein, we report the first biological validation of the TYROBP-centered LOAD network in the amyloidogenic APP/PSEN1 mouse model. Our data indicate that constitutive deletion of Tyrobp prevents behavioral and electrophysiological deficits in 8-month-old Aß-amyloid-depositing mouse. These results are associated with a recapitulation of the expected complement system subnetwork in APP/PSEN1 mice, followed by its reversal in the absence of TYROBP, predicted from the multiscale gene networks of human postmortem LOAD brain. Tyrobp deletion in the APP/PSEN1 mice repressed the induction of inflammatory cytokines and numerous other genes that are up-regulated in the switch from homeostatic microglia to disease-associated microglia (DAM)44, including Trem2, Clec7a, Cst7, Itgax and Ctsd. DAM are found in AD at the proximity of the Aß plaques and express genes associated with lysosomal-phagocytic, lipid metabolism, and AD risk factors including Apoe, and Trem2. While we did not detect differences in ApoE expression, the decreased expression of numerous DAM genes highlights the role of TYROBP as an important early activator of DAM. Moreover, the absence of APP/PSEN1 associated behavioral and electrophysiological impairments in the absence of TYROBP suggests that at least in this mouse model, decreasing DAM activation might play a beneficial role in the progression of AD.
The complement system is robustly activated in our dataset. This system plays a crucial role in physiologic synaptic pruning49, is activated in human and mouse AD brains27,57–59 and is associated with early synapse loss in AD26,27. Amyloidogenic APP/PSEN1 mouse models with reduced components of the complement system, e.g. C3, C1q or CR3, showed improved performance on learning and memory tasks despite having increased Aß deposition26. Similarly, herein and in our previous report28, we show that deletion of Tyrobp in the APP/PSEN1 mouse model did not play a prominent role in Aß deposition but reversed the behavioral and electrophysiological alterations associated with the APP/PSEN1 mutations. The regulation of the complement subnetwork by TYROBP, including a decrease in several of the same components previously reported further supports a beneficial effect of decreased complement pathway activation in AD pathology. Notably, APP/PSEN1 mice with deletion of Progranulin (Grn) demonstrate overexpression of some TYROBP network genes, including C1q60, and while they have reduced diffuse Aß and axonal dystrophy with partially improved behavioral deficits, they also manifest increased neuronal injury. We report that deletion of Tyrobp in the APP/PSEN1 model also reduces Grn expression level in APP/PSEN1 alone.
This study represents the first in vivo validation of a hub/driver gene and subnetwork predicted by integrative network analyses of human postmortem sporadic LOAD brain and suggests that reduction of TYROBP level or inhibition of its activity could represent a potential therapeutic target for AD prevention and/or treatment. Moreover, this study validates the multiscale network for identifying gene subnetworks and key drivers in complex diseases and for providing new insights for drug discovery programs.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
The authors recognize the support of the National Institute on Aging AMP-AD U01AG046170. The study was also supported by the Louis B. Mayer Foundation (SG), Cure Alzheimer’s Fund (SG), Alzheimer’s Disease Research Division of BrightFocus Foundation (A2018253F to MA and A2016482F to JVHM), the Mount Sinai Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center (ADRC, Grant P50 AG005138 to Mary Sano with internal pilot grant to MA), Sarah and Gideon Gartner Foundation (SG), Georgianne and Dr. Reza Khatib Foundation (SG), Werber Family Foundation (SG), Jennifer and Scott Moskowitz Foundation (SG), and Jane Martin and Stuart Katz Foundation (SG).
Footnotes
Conflict of interest
None.
References:
- 1.Lambert JC, Ibrahim-Verbaas CA, Harold D, Naj AC, Sims R, Bellenguez C et al. Meta-analysis of 74,046 individuals identifies 11 new susceptibility loci for Alzheimer’s disease. Nat Genet 2013; 45: 1452–1458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Naj AC, Jun G, Beecham GW, Wang L-S, Vardarajan BN, Buros J et al. Common variants at MS4A4/MS4A6E, CD2AP, CD33 and EPHA1 are associated with late-onset Alzheimer’s disease. Nat Genet 2011; 43: 436–441. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Sims R, van der Lee SJ, Naj AC, Bellenguez C, Badarinarayan N, Jakobsdottir J et al. Rare coding variants in PLCG2, ABI3, and TREM2 implicate microglial-mediated innate immunity in Alzheimer’s disease. Nat Genet 2017; 49: 1373–1384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Gandy S, DeKosky ST. Toward the treatment and prevention of Alzheimer’s disease: rational strategies and recent progress. Annu Rev Med 2013; 64: 367–383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Zhang B, Gaiteri C, Bodea L-G, Wang Z, McElwee J, Podtelezhnikov AA et al. Integrated systems approach identifies genetic nodes and networks in late-onset Alzheimer’s disease. Cell 2013; 153: 707–720. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Wang M, Roussos P, McKenzie A, Zhou X, Kajiwara Y, Brennand KJ et al. Integrative network analysis of nineteen brain regions identifies molecular signatures and networks underlying selective regional vulnerability to Alzheimer’s disease. Genome Med 2016; 8: 104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Yang J, Huang T, Song W-M, Petralia F, Mobbs CV, Zhang B et al. Discover the network mechanisms underlying the connections between aging and age-related diseases. Sci Rep 2016; 6: 32566. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Narayanan M, Huynh JL, Wang K, Yang X, Yoo S, McElwee J et al. Common dysregulation network in the human prefrontal cortex underlies two neurodegenerative diseases. Mol Syst Biol 2014; 10: 743. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.White CC, Yang H-S, Yu L, Chibnik LB, Dawe RJ, Yang J et al. Identification of genes associated with dissociation of cognitive performance and neuropathological burden: Multistep analysis of genetic, epigenetic, and transcriptional data. PLoS Med 2017; 14: e1002287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Mormino EC, Sperling RA, Holmes AJ, Buckner RL, De Jager PL, Smoller JW et al. Polygenic risk of Alzheimer disease is associated with early- and late-life processes. Neurology 2016; 87: 481–488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Farfel JM, Yu L, Buchman AS, Schneider JA, De Jager PL, Bennett DA. Relation of genomic variants for Alzheimer disease dementia to common neuropathologies. Neurology 2016; 87: 489–496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Gaiteri C, Mostafavi S, Honey CJ, De Jager PL, Bennett DA. Genetic variants in Alzheimer disease - molecular and brain network approaches. Nat Rev Neurol 2016; 12: 413–427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Roostaei T, Nazeri A, Felsky D, De Jager PL, Schneider JA, Pollock BG et al. Genome-wide interaction study of brain beta-amyloid burden and cognitive impairment in Alzheimer’s disease. Mol Psychiatry 2017; 22: 287–295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Chan G, White CC, Winn PA, Cimpean M, Replogle JM, Glick LR et al. CD33 modulates TREM2: convergence of Alzheimer loci. Nat Neurosci 2015; 18: 1556–1558. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.International Genomics of Alzheimer’s Disease Consortium (IGAP). Convergent genetic and expression data implicate immunity in Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement J Alzheimers Assoc 2015; 11: 658–671. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Bennett DA, Yu L, De Jager PL. Building a pipeline to discover and validate novel therapeutic targets and lead compounds for Alzheimer’s disease. Biochem Pharmacol 2014; 88: 617–630. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Readhead B, Haure-Mirande J-V, Zhang B, Haroutunian V, Gandy S, Schadt EE et al. Molecular systems evaluation of oligomerogenic APP(E693Q) and fibrillogenic APP(KM670/671NL)/PSEN1(Δexon9) mouse models identifies shared features with human Alzheimer’s brain molecular pathology. Mol Psychiatry 2016; 21: 1099–1111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Takaki R, Watson SR, Lanier LL. DAP12: an adapter protein with dual functionality. Immunol Rev 2006; 214: 118–129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Turnbull IR, Colonna M. Activating and inhibitory functions of DAP12. Nat Rev Immunol 2007; 7: 155–161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Linnartz-Gerlach B, Kopatz J, Neumann H. Siglec functions of microglia. Glycobiology 2014; 24: 794–799. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Mócsai A, Abram CL, Jakus Z, Hu Y, Lanier LL, Lowell CA. Integrin signaling in neutrophils and macrophages uses adaptors containing immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motifs. Nat Immunol 2006; 7: 1326–1333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Han C, Jin J, Xu S, Liu H, Li N, Cao X. Integrin CD11b negatively regulates TLR-triggered inflammatory responses by activating Syk and promoting degradation of MyD88 and TRIF via Cbl-b. Nat Immunol 2010; 11: 734–742. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Kaneko M, Sano K, Nakayama J, Amano N. Nasu-Hakola disease: The first case reported by Nasu and review: The 50th Anniversary of Japanese Society of Neuropathology. Neuropathol Off J Jpn Soc Neuropathol 2010; 30: 463–470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Pottier C, Ravenscroft TA, Brown PH, Finch NA, Baker M, Parsons M et al. TYROBP genetic variants in early-onset Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Aging 2016; 48: 222.e9–222.e15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Ulland TK, Song WM, Huang SC-C, Ulrich JD, Sergushichev A, Beatty WL et al. TREM2 Maintains Microglial Metabolic Fitness in Alzheimer’s Disease. Cell 2017; 170: 649–663.e13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Shi Q, Chowdhury S, Ma R, Le KX, Hong S, Caldarone BJ et al. Complement C3 deficiency protects against neurodegeneration in aged plaque-rich APP/PS1 mice. Sci Transl Med 2017; 9. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf6295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Hong S, Beja-Glasser VF, Nfonoyim BM, Frouin A, Li S, Ramakrishnan S et al. Complement and microglia mediate early synapse loss in Alzheimer mouse models. Science 2016; 352: 712–716. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Haure-Mirande J-V, Audrain M, Fanutza T, Kim SH, Klein WL, Glabe C et al. Deficiency of TYROBP, an adapter protein for TREM2 and CR3 receptors, is neuroprotective in a mouse model of early Alzheimer’s pathology. Acta Neuropathol (Berl) 2017; 134: 769–788. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Jankowsky JL, Fadale DJ, Anderson J, Xu GM, Gonzales V, Jenkins NA et al. Mutant presenilins specifically elevate the levels of the 42 residue beta-amyloid peptide in vivo: evidence for augmentation of a 42-specific gamma secretase. Hum Mol Genet 2004; 13: 159–170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Bakker AB, Hoek RM, Cerwenka A, Blom B, Lucian L, McNeil T et al. DAP12-deficient mice fail to develop autoimmunity due to impaired antigen priming. Immunity 2000; 13: 345–353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods San Diego Calif 2001; 25: 402–408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Robinson MD, McCarthy DJ, Smyth GK. edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinforma Oxf Engl 2010; 26: 139–140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Ritchie ME, Phipson B, Wu D, Hu Y, Law CW, Shi W et al. limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies. Nucleic Acids Res 2015; 43: e47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing. J R Stat Soc Ser B Methodol 1995; 57: 289–300. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Haroutunian V, Katsel P, Schmeidler J. Transcriptional vulnerability of brain regions in Alzheimer’s disease and dementia. Neurobiol Aging 2009; 30: 561–573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Bennett DA, Schneider JA, Arvanitakis Z, Wilson RS. Overview and findings from the religious orders study. Curr Alzheimer Res 2012; 9: 628–645. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Knight EM, Kim SH, Kottwitz JC, Hatami A, Albay R, Suzuki A et al. Effective anti-Alzheimer Aβ therapy involves depletion of specific Aβ oligomer subtypes. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflammation 2016; 3: e237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Kim SH, Steele JW, Lee SW, Clemenson GD, Carter TA, Treuner K et al. Proneurogenic Group II mGluR antagonist improves learning and reduces anxiety in Alzheimer Aβ oligomer mouse. Mol Psychiatry 2014; 19: 1235–1242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Lambert MP, Velasco PT, Chang L, Viola KL, Fernandez S, Lacor PN et al. Monoclonal antibodies that target pathological assemblies of Abeta. J Neurochem 2007; 100: 23–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Tomic JL, Pensalfini A, Head E, Glabe CG. Soluble fibrillar oligomer levels are elevated in Alzheimer’s disease brain and correlate with cognitive dysfunction. Neurobiol Dis 2009; 35: 352–358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Fanutza T, Del Prete D, Ford MJ, Castillo PE, D’Adamio L. APP and APLP2 interact with the synaptic release machinery and facilitate transmitter release at hippocampal synapses. eLife 2015; 4: e09743. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Barnes CA. Memory deficits associated with senescence: a neurophysiological and behavioral study in the rat. J Comp Physiol Psychol 1979; 93: 74–104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Sunyer B, Patil S, Höger H, Lubec G. Barnes maze, a useful task to assess spatial reference memory in the mice. Protoc Exch 2007 10.1038/nprot.2007.390. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Keren-Shaul H, Spinrad A, Weiner A, Matcovitch-Natan O, Dvir-Szternfeld R, Ulland TK et al. A Unique Microglia Type Associated with Restricting Development of Alzheimer’s Disease. Cell 2017; 169: 1276–1290.e17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Masuda T, Tsuda M, Yoshinaga R, Tozaki-Saitoh H, Ozato K, Tamura T et al. IRF8 is a critical transcription factor for transforming microglia into a reactive phenotype. Cell Rep 2012; 1: 334–340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Masuda T, Iwamoto S, Yoshinaga R, Tozaki-Saitoh H, Nishiyama A, Mak TW et al. Transcription factor IRF5 drives P2X4R+-reactive microglia gating neuropathic pain. Nat Commun 2014; 5: 3771. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Lightfield KL, Persson J, Brubaker SW, Witte CE, von Moltke J, Dunipace EA et al. Critical function for Naip5 in inflammasome activation by a conserved carboxy-terminal domain of flagellin. Nat Immunol 2008; 9: 1171–1178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Okamoto T, Gohil K, Finkelstein EI, Bove P, Akaike T, van der Vliet A. Multiple contributing roles for NOS2 in LPS-induced acute airway inflammation in mice. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2004; 286: L198–209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Stevens B, Allen NJ, Vazquez LE, Howell GR, Christopherson KS, Nouri N et al. The classical complement cascade mediates CNS synapse elimination. Cell 2007; 131: 1164–1178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Miller JA, Woltjer RL, Goodenbour JM, Horvath S, Geschwind DH. Genes and pathways underlying regional and cell type changes in Alzheimer’s disease. Genome Med 2013; 5: 48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Yuan P, Condello C, Keene CD, Wang Y, Bird TD, Paul SM et al. TREM2 Haplodeficiency in Mice and Humans Impairs the Microglia Barrier Function Leading to Decreased Amyloid Compaction and Severe Axonal Dystrophy. Neuron 2016; 90: 724–739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Jay TR, Hirsch AM, Broihier ML, Miller CM, Neilson LE, Ransohoff RM et al. Disease Progression-Dependent Effects of TREM2 Deficiency in a Mouse Model of Alzheimer’s Disease. J Neurosci Off J Soc Neurosci 2017; 37: 637–647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Knight EM, Ruiz HH, Kim SH, Harte JC, Hsieh W, Glabe C et al. Unexpected partial correction of metabolic and behavioral phenotypes of Alzheimer’s APP/PSEN1 mice by gene targeting of diabetes/Alzheimer’s-related Sorcs1. Acta Neuropathol Commun 2016; 4: 16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Liu P, Reed MN, Kotilinek LA, Grant MKO, Forster CL, Qiang W et al. Quaternary Structure Defines a Large Class of Amyloid-β Oligomers Neutralized by Sequestration. Cell Rep 2015; 11: 1760–1771. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Marchetti C, Marie H. Hippocampal synaptic plasticity in Alzheimer’s disease: what have we learned so far from transgenic models? Rev Neurosci 2011; 22: 373–402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Debanne D, Guérineau NC, Gähwiler BH, Thompson SM. Paired-pulse facilitation and depression at unitary synapses in rat hippocampus: quantal fluctuation affects subsequent release. J Physiol 1996; 491 (Pt 1): 163–176. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Stoltzner SE, Grenfell TJ, Mori C, Wisniewski KE, Wisniewski TM, Selkoe DJ et al. Temporal accrual of complement proteins in amyloid plaques in Down’s syndrome with Alzheimer’s disease. Am J Pathol 2000; 156: 489–499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Veerhuis R Histological and direct evidence for the role of complement in the neuroinflammation of AD. Curr Alzheimer Res 2011; 8: 34–58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Tenner AJ. Complement in Alzheimer’s disease: opportunities for modulating protective and pathogenic events. Neurobiol Aging 2001; 22: 849–861. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Takahashi H, Klein ZA, Bhagat SM, Kaufman AC, Kostylev MA, Ikezu T et al. Opposing effects of progranulin deficiency on amyloid and tau pathologies via microglial TYROBP network. Acta Neuropathol (Berl) 2017; 133: 785–807. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Millstein J, Zhang B, Zhu J, Schadt EE. Disentangling molecular relationships with a causal inference test. BMC Genet 2009; 10: 23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.