The interaction of SARS-CoV-2 and other coronavirus with Angiotensin Converting Enzyme 2 (ACE2) as their main receptor: therapeutic implications

Abstract

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) originated from Wuhan, China in December 2019, and rapidly spread to other areas worldwide. Since then, COVID-19 has reached pandemic proportions with more than 570,000 deaths globally by mid-July 2020. The magnitude of the outbreak and the potentially severe clinical course of COVID-19 has led to a burst of scientific research on this novel coronavirus and its host receptor, angiotensin converting enzyme-2 (ACE2). ACE2 is a homolog of the angiotensin-I converting enzyme (ACE) that acts on several substrates in the renin-angiotensin system.

With unprecedented speed, scientific research has solved the structure of SARS-CoV-2 and imaged its binding with the ACE2 receptor. In SARS-CoV-2 infection, the viral spike (S) protein receptor binding domain (RBD) binds to ACE2 to enter the host cell. ACE2 expression in the lungs is relatively low, but it is present in type II pneumocytes, a cell type also endowed with transmembrane protease serine 2 (TMPRSS2). This protease is critical for priming the SARS-CoV-2 S protein to complex with ACE2 and enter the cells. Herein, we review the current understanding of the interaction of SARS-CoV-2 with ACE2 as it has rapidly unfolded over the last months. While it should not be assumed that we have a complete picture of SARS-CoV-2’s mechanism of infection and its interaction with ACE2 much has been learned with clear therapeutic implications. Potential therapies aimed at intercepting SARS-CoV-2 from reaching the full-length membrane-bound ACE2 receptor using soluble ACE2 protein and other potential approaches are briefly discussed as well.

Introduction

Since the turn of the century, coronaviruses have caused three major outbreaks. First, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) appeared in the Chinese Guangdong province in 2002. This outbreak had over 8.000 infections worldwide, with a 10% fatality rate [1] [2]. SARS-CoV likely crossed over to humans from bats, Himalayan palm civets (Paguma larvata), or raccoon dogs (Nyctereutes procyonoides) [3]. Only a decade later, the next large-scale coronavirus outbreak to arise was Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) in 2012. MERS-CoV infected fewer people than SARS-CoV but had a higher fatality rate of 36% [4]. Research teams soon discovered other coronavirus isolates phylogenetically similar to the virulent SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV human coronavirus strains and warned about the high risk of novel coronaviruses entering the human population [3,5]. In December 2019, a novel coronavirus appeared in Wuhan, Hubei Province, in Central China, which quickly showed human-to-human transmission [6]. In the United States, the first confirmed infection of this novel virus, termed SARS-CoV-2, appeared on January 19, 2020[7], and person-to-person transmission in the US was confirmed soon after [8]. For clarity, SARS-CoV-2 is the name of the virus, and Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) is the name of the disease it causes [9]. SARS-CoV-2 was declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization on March 11, 2020. As of July 6, 2020, there have been 11.565.541 SARS-CoV-2 infections in the world, with 536.658 deaths. Within the US, the number of infected is 2.922.000 with 130.208 number of fatalities (Johns Hopkins situation report).

Just two years after its identification as new enzyme within the renin angiotensin system, ACE2 was reported to be the receptor for SARS-CoV in 2003[10]. At the end of January 2020, Wan and colleagues had predicted that ACE2 is also the receptor for SARS-CoV-2 by comparing previous SARS-CoV structural analyses of atomic-level interactions between the RBD and ACE2 with the newly released genetic sequence of SARS-CoV-2 [11]. Shortly after, Hoffmann et al.[12] experimentally demonstrated that SARS-CoV-2 uses the ACE2 receptor for entry and the serine protease TMPRSS2 for SARS-CoV-2 priming[12]. The unprecedented speed and international collaboration of scientific research for the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic have revealed key aspects of its virology quickly. SARS-CoV-2, just as with SARS-CoV, uses ACE2 as its receptor for entry into cells [12–14]. In this review, we discuss the binding of SARS-CoV-2 to ACE2 and the role of specific proteases governing membrane fusion and infectivity by SARS-CoV. From this information we also discuss potential therapeutic opportunities including the use of soluble ACE2 proteins to intercept the SARS-CoV-2 so that fewer viral spike proteins are available to bind to the membrane-bound full-length ACE2, gain cell entry, and subsequently replicate inside the cell.

General coronavirus (CoV) structure and infection mechanism

Coronaviruses are the largest of all RNA viruses, with a non-segmented, positive-sense RNA genome of 27–32 kb. Within the coronavirus family Coronaviridae (order Nidovirales) are four genera: α−/ β−/γ−/δ-CoV. Of the six coronaviruses previously known to infect humans, two α-CoVs (HCoV-229E and HCoV-NL63) and two β-CoVs (HCoV-HKU1 and HCoV-OC43) only cause mild respiratory symptoms. The most significant human disease-causing coronaviruses are β-CoVs, including SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV, and the novel SARS-CoV-2. The γ−/δ-CoV strains mostly infect avian species [4] [9].

The coronavirus RNA genome is housed in a helical capsid made of nucleocapsid protein (N). Surrounding this RNA-nucleocapsid core is a lipid bilayer envelope composed of membrane protein (M), envelope protein (E), and spike protein (S) [4]. The S protein is anchored to the envelope via a single-pass transmembrane domain and has a short intracellular tail. The large ectodomain of the S protein radiates out, giving the virus a crown-like appearance (Corona means crown in Latin). The S protein mediates viral entry via its ectodomain, which consists of three S1 subunit heads responsible for receptor-binding, and a trimeric S2 subunit stalk that facilitates membrane fusion.

Coronavirus spikes function as class I membrane fusion proteins [4]. In their multi-step mechanism to bring the viral and host membranes together, the metastable S protein structurally rearranges from the pre-fusion to post-fusion configurations [4]. On each of the three S1 subunits is a receptor-binding domain (RBD) with distinct sub-regions that recognize diverse receptors depending on the viral species. SARS-CoV and several SARS-related coronaviruses interact with the host receptor directly through their (S^B) domain [14]. The S^A or S^B (depending on which CoV species) determinants of receptor binding are transiently exposed (“up-conformation”) or hidden (“down-conformation”) through a hinge-like movement [15]. In the pre-fusion state, host cell proteases prime the S protein by excision of two amino acids. When the S1 subunit binds to the host cell receptor, it dissociates from the S2 subunit, and the S2 subunit transforms into a stable, post-fusion, dumbbell-shaped conformation [15] [4]. The dumbbell S2 has a bundle structure of six helices that inserts into the target host membrane and brings the viral and host membranes together [4].

A coronavirus RBD may recognize various cell-surface molecules, including proteins, sugars, and heparan sulfate [2]. The S1-N-terminal domain (S1-NTD) usually binds to carbohydrate sites, and the S1-C-terminal domain (S1-CTD) recognizes protein receptors [4]. Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4/CD26, on chromosome 2q24.2), an essential T-cell activation antigen and peptide hormone regulatory enzyme, is the receptor for MERS-CoV. [16]. The MERS-CoV S protein interacts with its receptor (DPP4) through both its domain A (S^A) and its domain B (S^B)[17]. As discussed below, the primary receptor for SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 is the host angiotensin-converting enzyme-2 (ACE2, on chromosome Xp22.2). ACE2 shares no structural or sequence homology with DPP4 [16]. Another possible receptor for SARS-CoV-2 is CD147[18]. This immunoglobulin superfamily extracellular matrix metalloproteinase inducer is present on erythrocytes, leukocytes, platelets, and endothelial cells. An adequate evaluation of the significance of CD147 and receptors other than ACE2 for SARS-CoV-2 infection is beyond the scope of this article.

Studies show that the binding affinity of SARS-CoV RBD and the host ACE2 receptor determines host susceptibility to the virus [2]. The S1 spike RBD is also a significant inducer of host immune responses [2,4,19]. An amino acid substitution (K479N in SARS-CoV RBD) that increased the RBD/human ACE2 binding affinity may be responsible for the civet-to-human spillover of SARS-CoV [2]. Likewise, a specific mutation (S487T in the SARS-CoV RBD) facilitated human-to-human transmission [2]. Other SARS-CoV strains show RBD mutations at five positions that each enhance the S1 binding affinity to either human ACE2 or civet ACE2 [2]. The strength of the binding interaction between SARS-CoV S protein and human ACE2 also correlates with the viral replication rate in different species and transmissibility [14].

ACE2 is the receptor for SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2

Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 was discovered 20 years ago and received its name because of its homology with angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) [20,21]. ACE2 is a type I transmembrane glycoprotein with a single zinc metalloprotease active site that acts as a monocarboxypeptidase cleaving a single amino acid, always phenylalanine [22,23]. ACE2 shares 42% homology with the metalloprotease catalytic domains of ACE. Unlike ACE, however, ACE2 contains only one active domain[20,21]. The two homologs also have opposing actions, whereas ACE increases the formation of Ang II, ACE2 fosters its degradation [20–25]

ACE is known for its vital role in the complex renin-angiotensin system (RAS)[23,26–29]. Inhibitors of this enzyme developed in the late 1970s became an unprecedented therapeutic achievement for hypertension, cardiovascular, and kidney disease. Of note, ACE inhibitors do not inhibit ACE2 [30,31]. Over the last decade, there has been an interest in ACE2 amplification for potential therapeutic use based primarily on preclinical studies(reviewed in [32]). ACE2 cleaves the phenylalanine amino acid from AngII to form angiotensin 1–7 (Ang1–7) and from Ang I to form Ang 1–9[22]. The Ang1–7 peptide has vasoprotective effects mediated via activation of Mas, a G protein-coupled receptor [27,33]. The carboxy-terminal phenylalanine is also hydrolyzed from other substrates, such as Apelin-13 and Apelin-36 peptides, by ACE2 [22,34]. ACE 2 also cleaves the proinflammatory peptide des-arg⁹ bradykinin(BK 1–8) to form BK 1–7. In addition to its enzymatic functions, ACE2 has also noncatalytic actions that are not yet fully elucidated.

ACE2 was reported to be the receptor for SARS-CoV in 2003 [10]. A few years later, Li et al. reported the crystal structure of the RBD of SARS-CoV bound with the peptidase domain of hACE2[35]. The SARS-CoV S protein ectodomain is a trimeric S2 stalk terminating with three individual S1 heads, which contain the S1 CTD with affinity to ACE2 binding domains [2]. From the RBD/ACE2 interaction, these authors established important principles on host receptor adaptations, cross-species infections, and future evolution of SARS-CoV[2]. The structure of the RBD moreover suggested ways to design coronaviruses vaccines[35]. Unfortunately, this opportunity was not fully explored as the SARS-CoV infection resolved spontaneously.

In the current pandemic, ACE2 was predicted early in January 2020 be the receptor for SARS-CoV-2 by Wan and colleagues [11] by comparing previous SARS-CoV structural analyses of atomic-level interactions between the RBD and ACE2 with the newly released genetic sequence of SARS-CoV-2 [11]. Then in early February, virus infectivity studies with HeLa cells were reported by Zhou et al [36]. The next step in elucidating the method of entry for SARS-CoV-2 was the solved structure of SARS-CoV-2 S protein published online in mid-February 2020 by Wrapp and colleagues [15]. They showed a cryo-election microscopy (cryo-EM) structure of the SARS-CoV-2 trimeric S protein in its pre-fusion configuration with one of the three S1 RBDs in the receptor-accessible “up-conformation.” As expected from studies of other class I viral membrane fusion proteins, these studies show that the pre-fusion conformation rearranges when the S1 subunit binds to its receptor, resulting in shedding of the S1 subunit, and positioning of the remaining S2 subunit in a stable post-fusion configuration [15]. The cryo-EM structure was further support for the emerging hypothesis that ACE2 is the host receptor for SARS-CoV-2 because it showed a high degree of structural homology between SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 [15]. Wrapp and colleagues also showed non-imaging evidence that the S protein of SARS-CoV-2 binds ACE2 with ~10-to20-fold higher affinity than SARS-CoV [15]. Other studies, however, have found similar binding affinities of SARS-Cov-2 and SARS-CoV for hACE2 [14].

Similarities between SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV in structure and sequence indicated convergent evolution between the SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV RBDs for improved binding to ACE2[37]. Concrete evidence that ACE2 is the receptor for SARS-CoV was published online in early March 2020 by Yan and colleagues [38]. They showed cryo-EM structures of full-length ACE2 with the RBD of the SARS-CoV-2 S protein at a local resolution of 3.5Å at the ACE2-RBD interface. These authors also described the structure of ACE2 as a dimer suggesting that two trimeric spike proteins can bind to an ACE2 receptor[38]. The next day, Hoffmann et al published experiments that demonstrated SARS-CoV-2 uses the ACE2 receptor for cell entry and the protease TMPRSS2 for S protein priming [12].(see below)

Within days of these two important reports, cryo-EM studies by Walls and colleagues [14] showed multiple organizations of the S^B domains within the trimeric (S1) subunit [14]. Approximately half of the selected particle cryo-EM images had a single S^B domain open, and the other half showed the three S^B domains all closed [14]. These findings confirmed the conformations of Wrapp and colleagues, except for the discovery of the all-closed structure. Walls and colleagues also found a furin cleavage site at the S1/S2 boundary [14]. This cleavage site is unique to SARS-CoV-2 compared to SARS-CoV and SARS-related coronaviruses. The authors speculate that the ubiquitous expression of furin-like proteases could expand the novel virus’s tissue tropism, transmissibility, and pathogenicity [14].

In late March, Lan et al. [37] then determined the crystal structure of the RBD of the SARS-CoV-2 S protein bound to ACE2, thus confirming ACE2 as the receptor for SARS-CoV-2 (Fig 1). To complete the cycle of rapid key publications, an article at the beginning of April by Wang and colleagues[39] provided the cryo-EM of SARS-CoV-2’s C-terminal domain (CTD) complexed with hACE2 at a resolution of 2.5Å[39]. They also showed more hACE2 atomic interactions with SARS-CoV-2-CTD than SARS-CoV-RBD. This observation indicated a higher affinity for the ACE2 receptor by SARS-CoV-2 than by SARS-CoV which is in agreement with Wrapp and colleagues [39]. Additionally, Wang et al. [40] described a panel of murine monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and polyclonal antibodies (pAbs) against SARS-CoV S1/RBD that were unable to interact with the SARS-CoV-2 (S) protein, indicating notable differences in antigenicity between SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2. These findings shed light on the viral pathogenesis and provide crucial structural information regarding the development of therapeutic countermeasures against the emerging virus[40]

Figure 1.

ACE2 (green); the SARS-CoV-2 RBD core is shown in cyan and RBM in red. Disulfide bonds in the SARS-CoV-2 RBD are shown as sticks and indicated by arrows. The N-terminal helix of ACE2 responsible for binding is labelled. (From Lan et al., permission requested).

ACE2 tissue distribution and SARS-CoV-2 infection

Before the discovery that ACE2 was a receptor of some coronaviruses, several investigations delineated the distribution of ACE2 within body tissues[20,41–44]. ACE2 was first reported to be abundant in kidneys, testis, and the heart[20,45]. Later it was found that its distribution was more widespread, and the high content of ACE2 in the intestine was noted[46]. Real-time PCR revealed the expression of ACE2 mRNA in 72 human tissues[46] and the immunolocalization of ACE2 protein further confirms its ubiquity in human organs, but with localization in specific cell types in many human tissues [47]. ACE2 is expressed in the kidney proximal tubule and, to a lesser extent, in glomerular epithelial cells called podocytes [43]. Information on immunostaining for ACE2 from representative tissue specimens is available in the Human Protein Atlas database showing a strong signal for ACE2 protein in the brush border of small intestinal enterocytes. The seminiferous tubules and interstitial cells of human testis also demonstrated strong immunostaining. In human kidneys, prominent immunostaining reactions were present in the epithelial cells of proximal convoluted tubules and Bowman’s capsule, as previously reported in mice. [42,43].

Some authors note that the upper respiratory tract may not be the primary site of SARS-CoV entry because ACE2 expression is absent on the surface of the squamous epithelia of the oral mucosa and the nasopharynx [48]. However, ACE2 is highly expressed on malignant oral epithelium[49], and SARS-CoV-2 is present in the nasal mucous gland epithelium of experimentally infected macaques. (Rockx, BioRx 2020 https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.17.995639). Consistent with our studies in mice showing low overall ACE2 pulmonary expression[50], ACE2 immunoreactivity is reported as negative for the lungs in the Human Protein Atlas database. However, in an immunohistochemical study of 94 tissues, including 14 lung specimens, pulmonary alveolar type I and type II cells did express ACE2.[47] Although bronchial epithelial cells stain weakly for ACE2 and the lung as a whole has scant ACE2 expression, type II pneumocytes are endowed not only with ACE2 but also with TMPRRS2, the protease which seems essential for SARS-CoV-2 S protein priming and subsequent cell entry[12]. This cell type was thought to be the primary target of SARS-CoV infection [51], and it is likely the primary target for SARS-CoV-2 as well. Small intestinal enterocytes, and dermal eccrine glands also expressed ACE2 protein[48]. There was protein expression in both endothelial cells and smooth muscle cells from all organs studied as well as mild expression in basal cells of squamous epithelia

Ziegler et al. found expression of the ACE2, the entry receptor for SARS- CoV-2 restricted to type II pneumocytes in the lung, absorptive enterocytes in the gut, and goblet secretory cells in the nasal mucosa[48]. These locations are particularly crucial to viral pathophysiology because of their contact with the external environment. Enterocytes throughout the small intestine principally within ileum and jejunum show the highest levels of ACE2 gene transcription [47]. SARS-CoV appears on the surface of small intestinal enterocytes, which correlates with the localization of ACE2 on the brush border. The virus actively replicates in the enterocyte as well [47].

The tissue distribution of ACE2 roughly correlates with SARS-CoV tropism in fatal cases of infection [51]. Clinical symptoms of SARS-CoV-2 may be explained by viral entry and infection in locations of ACE2 receptor expression such as pulmonary, gastrointestinal, and possibly kidney tissues. Coronaviruses classically cause respiratory, gastrointestinal, and central nervous disease in humans and other animals [4,52] Respiratory symptoms are a common finding for COVID-19 infection. In an early study of COVID-19 patients in Wuhan, about three-fourths had a cough at the onset of illness, and more than half developed dyspnea [53]. Gastrointestinal symptoms are also a feature of the current COVID-19 pandemic, but much less frequently than cough or dyspnea. Early on, there were reports that 2–10% of COVID-19 patients had diarrhea, abdominal pain, and vomiting [54,55]. The cause of the diarrhea is not fully explained but one possibility is that ACE2 expression in the gut is suppressed which could perhaps interfere with electrolyte transport.[56,57] COVID-19 patient stool samples contain SARS-CoV-2 [7] [58]. One case report describes a patient without fever or respiratory symptoms, but with acute enterocolitis secondary to SARS-CoV-2 infection. [59] The patient’s stool continued to be positive for SARS-CoV-2 through the 15^th day of hospitalization [59]. Xiao and colleagues found that 23.29% of the COVID-19 patients in their study have SARS-CoV-2 positive stool but negative respiratory samples [58].

There are also reports of neurological sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection. In one SARS-CoV-2 clinical summary, a patient lost involuntary control over breathing, and several patients suffered acute respiratory failure [60]. Although ACE2 is mainly localized in epithelial cells and is not present in glomerular and kidney vessels [43,61], endothelial cells and smooth muscle cells of stomach, small intestine, and colon have been reported to have some ACE2 [47]. ACE2 stains endothelial and smooth muscle cells of the brain, perhaps explaining some instances of CNS symptoms [20,47]. Moreover, SARS causes neuronal death in the olfactory epithelium of mice, and SARS patients may have the virus in CSF [60]. These observations are intriguing, given anosmia symptoms in some COVID-19 patients [51]. While lung injury is the principal manifestation of severe COVID-19, acute kidney injury is also a COVID-19 complication that is associated with high mortality [58,62–72]. The pathophysiology of AKI in COVID-19 patients is a complex process which is not well understood but may be driven by AngII pathway activation, cytokine storm, dysregulation of complement, hypercoagulation, microangiopathy and virus-mediated injury [62].

Older studies showed upregulation of ACE2 angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor blockers (ARBs) and ACE inhibitors in certain experimental conditions, but these results have not always been consistent [31,61,73,74]. Data from studies showing upregulation of ACE2 caused substantial concerns that renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockers may exacerbate disease in patients exposed to COVID-19 [73–75]. The effect of ACE inhibitors and ARBs on ACE2 protein expression in the lungs, however, had not been previously reported. Recently Wysocki et al. reported that neither captopril nor telmisartan had a significant effect on ACE2 activity in total lung lysates or isolated lung membranes[76]. Therefore, based on these experimental findings in mouse lungs it is unlikely that ACE inhibitors or ARBs increase SARS-CoV-2 infectivity. It should be noted, however, that in the setting of hypertension the response to these agents could be modified. Therefore, further studies are needed in patients treated with these agents.

Finally, there are analogs of ACE2 that lack enzymatic activity, like collectrin. The homology between ACE2 and collectrin is restricted to the C-terminal region only (616–805). This region is not involved in binding of the virus to ACE2. In addition, the peptidase domain (1–615 AA) of ACE2 through which the viral receptor binding domain interacts with ACE2 is lacking in colllectrin. Altogether, this makes the collectrin an unlikely target for SARS-Cov-2 binding. Collectrin does have an important role in the amino acid transport in the kidney proximal tubule[77] Of note, some patients with COVID-19 exhibit some features of Fanconi syndrome[78]. Therefore, a role for collectrin, if altered, could be part of the tubular dysfunction reported in COVID-19 patients.

Binding of SARS-CoV-2 to ACE2 receptors and internalization

ACE2, in its full-length form, contains a structural transmembrane domain, which anchors its extracellular domain to the plasma membrane. (Fig 2.) In its full-length form, ACE2 has 805 amino acids, whereas in its soluble form ACE2 has only 740 amino acids[32]. Soluble ACE2 usually is barely detectable in the circulation or body fluids. It can be shed into the blood and tubular urine by ADAM Metallopeptidase Domain 17(ADAMS17), a disintegrin and metalloproteinase [79–81]. The levels of circulating ACE2, however, can increase moderately in several pathologies, including diabetes and cardiovascular disease.[26]. Full-length ACE2 is widely expressed in the cell membrane of several organs, including kidneys, testicles, and the gastrointestinal tract.

Figure 2.

ACE2 in its full-length a cell membrane-bound enzyme consisting of 805 amino acids (aa). It is anchored in the cell membrane by a short transmembrane domain (red). The main part of ACE2 is on the outer surface of the cell (​ectoenzyme) with only a small C-terminal tail being in the intracellular space. On the N-terminus, there is a signal peptide (green) which directs the protein from the cell organelles to the plasma membrane. The catalytic domain (egg-shaped sphere) renders the protein enzymatically active. The extracellular part of ACE2 which is devoid of the transmembrane region and the intracellular tail is referred as “soluble” (maximally 740 aa long) because is not membrane/tissue bound and is able to float in body fluids. Similar to full length ACE2, the soluble ACE2 contains a fully functional catalytic domain.

Human ACE2 in its full-length and soluble form recognize the receptor binding domain of SARS-CoV-2. The receptor site for the S protein of both SARS-CoV [82], and SARS-CoV-2[83] resides in the extracellular domain. Therefore, both the full-length and soluble ACE2 proteins have the receptor site. SARS-CoV-2 engages ACE2 as its primary entry receptor. Following ACE2 receptor binding, host cell proteases cleave the SARS-CoV-2 S protein for successful entry into the cell [12]. After binding of SARS-CoV-2 S protein to ACE2, there is priming by transmembrane protease serine 2 (TMPRSS2), which is essential for the fusion and internalization of the ACE2-viral spike complex[84](Figure 3). The circulating soluble ACE2 protein, unlike the membrane bound full-length ACE2 cannot enter the cell as it lacks the transmembrane domain. Recent studies at the single-cell level have provided information on ACE2 coexpression with mRNA from proteases such as TMPRSS2 in specific kidney cells but not in other cells from the same kidneys[48,62]. Similar variation in coexpression may apply to the lung or gastrointestinal tract, as well. The cleavage of SARS-CoV-2 S protein may also be accomplished by Cathepsin B and Cathepsin L [84]. Thus, proteases play an essential role in SARS-CoV-2 cellular entry and they have been linked to SARS-CoV cellular entry and infection[85,86]. In the process, it is believed that a state of deficiency of the membrane-bound enzyme ensues, and this fosters lung injury [87–91]. Typically the full-length ACE2 enzyme functions to protect against organ injury by cleavage and disposal of Ang II, and formation of Ang 1–7 (Fig 3.). Moreover, ACE2 degrades des-arg⁹ bradykinin(BK 1–8). A deficiency of ACE2 leads to BK 1–8 accumulation and its attendant proinflammatory effects [92–94]. Without ACE2 acting as a guardian, excessive levels of proinflammatory peptides arise in the reactive lung environment. Other organs, like the kidneys, are likely prone to local injury by a similar ACE2-depletion mechanism. It should be noted that the hypothesis that ACE2 depletion after SARS-CoV-2 infection needs confirmation. In fact, ACE2 is upregulated at the transcriptional level by interferons which are likely increased in the face of SARS-CoV-2 infection[48]. Moreover, ACE2 and ACE do not colocalize in the apical alveolar surface the way they do in the proximal tubule of the kidney. This makes it more difficult to explain how ACE2 controls the cleavage of peptides like Ang II and des-arg⁹ bradykinin that, under normal conditions, are not in contact with the apical site of. alveolar cells. This is not to say that provision of recombinant ACE2 will not be effective as it should help the dissipation of Ang II at other sites. In any case, the administration should be safe because soluble ACE2 lacks a transmembrane domain and thus the ability to enter cells after binding with SARS-CoV-2.

Figure 3.

Upper panel. SARS-CoV-2 binds to ACE2 and after priming by serine protease TMPRSS2 is activated and then internalized. In the process ACE2 protein decreases from the membrane. ACE2 receptor (Blue) Spike protein (green) TMPRSS2 (red).

Lower panel. ACE2 (blue) converts Ang II (angiotensin II)) to Ang-(1–7), Ang I to Ang-(1–9) and des-arg⁹ bradykinin(BK 1–8) to BK 1–7. ACE (red) converts Ang I to Ang II.

Potential therapies in connection with ACE2 to combat SARS-CoV-2 infection

There is preliminary data from COVID-19 patients in whom elevated levels of plasma Ang II correlated with the degree of lung injury [95]. In mouse models of acute lung injury, likewise, Ang II increases in lung tissues when ACE2 decreases [87]. Early preclinical studies in respiratory syncytial virus and avian H5N1 influenza infected patients suggested that restoration of ACE2 by recombinant ACE2 infusion appeared to reverse worsening lung injury [96–98]. The lung-protective effect may have been due to the lowering of Ang II levels by recombinant ACE2.

Binding of SARS-CoV-2 S protein to the full-length ACE2, followed by TMPRSS2 protease priming, is required for fusion and internalization of the ACE2-viral spike complex (fig 3). It is often said, mainly from the early findings of Kuba et al.[87] using SARS-CoV to infect lung tissues, that SARS-CoV infection causes a state of deficiency of full-length ACE2 which fosters lung injury[87–91]. The full-length ACE2 enzymatic functions protect against organ injury by cleavage and disposal of Ang II, and the formation of Ang 1–7 as well as cleaving des-arg⁹ bradykinin (BK 1–8) which is a proinflammatory peptide (Fig 3).

Since ACE2 exists both in membrane-bound and soluble circulating forms, one proposed therapy is administering the soluble form of ACE2 to act as a decoy to interfere with the binding of SARS-CoV-2 to the full-length ACE2 that is membrane-bound[99] (figure 4). Soluble ACE2 could be administered via intra-nasal spray, inhalation into the lung or systemically to prevent or treat SARS-CoV-2 infection. The administered soluble ACE2 would bind to SARS-CoV-2 S proteins, leaving the virus with less available S protein to attach to the full-length ACE2 in the cell membrane [99]. The proposed soluble ACE2 therapy is similar to a previous study in which a hybrid protein composed of truncated RBD of MERS-CoV S protein combined with human IgG Fc fragment bound the MERS-CoV receptor DPP4 and inhibited infection[100]. In vitro studies showed that a soluble form of ACE2 blocked SARS-CoV replication in the monkey kidney cell line, Vero-E6 [101]. Moreover, ACE2 fused to the Fc portion of immunoglobulin has been reported to neutralize SARS-CoV-2 in vitro, and the SARS-CoV-2 binds ACE2 with higher affinity than SARS-CoV[15,102]. Of great interest is a recent study showing that recombinant human soluble ACE2 protein resulted in a marked reduction of SARS-CoV-2 infectivity both in a cell line permissive for SARS-CoV-2 infection and in susceptible human organoids[103].

Figure 4.

Administering soluble ACE2 administration could intercept the coronavirus from binding to membrane bound full-length ACE2 and entering the cell. (Modified from Batlle et al. Clinical Science 2020, permission requested). Full-length membrane bound ACE2 (blue). Soluble ACE2 (Red). Transmembrane protease, serine 2 (TMPRSS2)(Grey).

Studies in animals or humans examining the therapeutic potential of soluble recombinant ACE2 to treat SARS-CoV-2 infection, however, have not been reported yet. Given the urgency of the pandemic, a randomized study using native human soluble rACE2 (1–740) has been registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT00886353). Soluble recombinant ACE2 protein has therapeutic potential for many therapeutic indications (reviewed in [32]). Animal data, however, are needed to gain mechanistic insight into potential therapies based on soluble ACE2 protein administration. Novel shorter ACE2 variants are being tested in mouse studies for the treatment of kidney diseases[104]. These shorter ACE2 variants may be particularly useful to prevent / treat COVID 19 associated kidney disease. The duration of action of human native soluble ACE2 moreover is only a few hours[23,105]. The half-life of ACE2 proteins, however, can be extended by fusing it with Fc [106] and other tags that our lab is currently using to treat kidney disease and permissive mouse models of SARS-CoV-2 infection. A potential additional benefit of treatment with soluble ACE2 proteins, moreover, is its applicability to future SARS-like coronavirus outbreaks. The treatment strategy of soluble ACE2 would avoid the problem of proofreading exoribonuclease that interferes with some antiretroviral drugs[107]. Mutation of the viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerase in some strains of SARS-CoV-2 would render the virus resistant to nucleoside-based therapeutics such as remdesivir. There is also room for exploring combination therapies, including remdesivir plus soluble ACE2 proteins, as a way to increase the therapeutic benefit. Therefore, there is now growing interest in looking at recombinant ACE2 protein to rebalance the RAS network and potentially help mitigate the pulmonary, cardiac, and kidney damage done by COVID-19. There is a concern that blood pressure could fall excessively with ACE2 administration. This definitely is a concern when Ang II is administered to support the blood pressure, otherwise ACE2 administration does not affect blood pressure in normotensive subjects[108].. It should be noted, however, that there are no studies yet in vivo demonstrating efficacy of soluble ACE2 proteins and that their neutralizing effect in vitro does not ensure success in vivo. The amount of soluble ACE2 protein required if given systemically may be very large unless it is administered directly to targeted tissues like the alveolar space. Following our proposal [99] of using soluble ACE2 proteins, Inai suggested, as a complementary approach, the use of small extracellular vesicles to deliver ACE2 to targeted tissues[109].

The commonly prescribed ACE inhibitors (ACEi) and AT1 receptors blockers (ARBs) used to control hypertension do not bind to ACE2[73]. A retrospective cohort study by Fosbøl et al.[110] found that prior use of ACE inhibitors or ARBs among 4480 patients diagnosed with COVID-19 was not significantly associated with changes in mortality[110]. Most evidence shows that the use of these agents does not increase susceptibility for infection or a worse course in COVID-19 patients [73,74,111–116]. On the contrary, one could make a case that continuation of these drugs could be beneficial in COVID-19 patients. There are ongoing prospective clinical trials that should answer this question soon. When these agents are given one would have to be careful to administer soluble ACE2 proteins which could result in an excessive fall in blood pressure but currently there are no studies, to our knowledge, that have examined this issue.

Promising therapeutic options include using monoclonal antibodies (mAb), administration of serum from recovered COVID-19 patients, and TMPRSS2 spike protein activating enzyme blockers. Producing a monoclonal antibody targeted against SARS-CoV-2 was an early therapeutic goal to research scientists [15]. However, only recently has there been evidence of a human monoclonal antibody that neutralizes SARS-CoV-2. This antibody binds to the spike RBD, preventing viral attachment to target cells[40]. A similar antibody-mediated treatment option is polyclonal antibody therapy, which transfuses the serum from a recovered COVID-19 patient into a SARS-CoV-2-exposed patient for prophylaxis [117]. A benefit of this option is that it is immediately available during this pandemic. Indeed, convalescent plasma was beneficial in the two previous coronavirus outbreaks of SARS and MERS [117]. Blocking TMPRSS2, the host cell SARS-CoV-2 S protein priming enzyme, by a drug approved for clinical use in Japan, camostat mesylate, has also been proposed but not tested as a therapeutic intervention [12]. There are many ongoing studies to investigate the efficacy of antiviral drugs (e.g., Remdesivir, favipiravir), anti-inflammatory agents (dexamethasone, statins), interleukin inhibitors (tocilizumab, sarilumab), and anticoagulants (heparin) for treatment of Covid-19 [118]. These may have some clinical utility for different populations and in different stages of the disease.

Preventing future coronavirus outbreaks may be accomplished by developing a broad-spectrum vaccine targeted against conserved epitopes of betacoronaviridiae. There are a plethora of possible coronavirus varieties emerging from zoonotic sources and this will be a challenging therapeutic and preventative effort.

Although the current SARS-CoV-2 pandemic is alarming and unprecedented in our lifetimes, it is not the first and will likely not be the last coronavirus outbreak. Because of the sobering reality that future diverse coronavirus outbreaks are likely, further investigations into multiple treatments are reasonable to prepare for another pandemic. Soluble ACE2 proteins that can bind SARS-CoV2 and other coronaviruses ought to prevent viral particle binding to the surface-bound, full-length ACE2 necessary for cell entry and infection. Indeed, studies of soluble recombinant human ACE2 proteins with infected animals or COVID 19 patients are needed to demonstrate usefulness to combat or limit infection caused by coronaviruses that utilize ACE2 as a receptor. Directly targeting the ACE2 receptor and TMPRSS2 required for viral entry may provide new options to add to the full spectrum of treatments against the pandemic. The hypertension research community with long standing interest on the renin angiotensin system and ACE2 in particular is poised to contribute to the understanding and treatment of coronavirus infections that use ACE2 as their receptor for cell entry.