Abstract
Background & Aims:
Equine hepacivirus (EqHV) is phylogenetically the closest relative of hepatitis C virus (HCV) and shares genome organization, hepatotropism, transient or persistent infection outcome, and the ability to cause hepatitis. Thus, EqHV studies are important to understand equine liver disease, and further as an outbred surrogate animal model for HCV pathogenesis and protective immune responses. Here, we aimed to characterize the course of EqHV infection and associated protective immune responses.
Approach & Results:
Seven horses were experimentally inoculated with EqHV, monitored for 6 months, and rechallenged with the same, and subsequently a heterologous EqHV. Clearance was the primary outcome (6 of 7) and was associated with subclinical hepatitis characterized by lymphocytic infiltrate and individual hepatocyte necrosis. Seroconversion was delayed and antibody titers waned slowly. Clearance of primary infection conferred non-sterilizing immunity resulting in shortened duration of viremia after rechallenge. Peripheral blood mononuclear cell responses in horses were minimal, although EqHV specific T cells were identified. Additionally, an interferon stimulated gene signature was detected in the liver during EqHV infection, similar to acute HCV in humans. EqHV, as HCV, is stimulated by direct binding of the liver-specific microRNA, miR-122. Interestingly, we found that EqHV infection sequesters enough miR-122 to functionally affect gene regulation in the liver. This RNA-based mechanism thus could have consequences for pathology.
Conclusions:
EqHV infection in horses typically has an acute resolving course, and the protective immune response lasts for at least a year and broadly attenuates subsequent infections. This could have important implications to achieve the primary goal of an HCV vaccine; to prevent chronicity while accepting acute resolving infection after virus exposure.
Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is an important human pathogen of the Flaviviridae family, chronically infecting ~70 million people, who are at increased risk of severe liver disease (1). Therapeutics have been developed, whereas a vaccine and thorough understanding of pathology and immune responses is lagging. This is largely due to the lack of robust immunocompetent animal models, given that chimpanzees are no longer available for research (2). The enigmatic GB-virus B (GBV-B), although related to HCV, never became widely used as a model (2). Many other related hepaciviruses were subsequently discovered, including those in bats, rodents, monkeys, horses, and cows (reviewed in (3)), and these can serve as potential surrogate models (4). Despite the large diversity of these viruses, equine hepacivirus (EqHV; initially named non-primate hepacivirus, NPHV) remains the closest genetic relative of HCV and therefore is of particular interest.
EqHV closely resembles HCV, including genome organization (5), hepatotropism (6–9), dual infection outcomes (spontaneous clearance and persistence for >6 months) (7,10), and seemingly the ability to cause fibrotic disease with chronic infection (11). HCV RNA accumulation is stimulated by binding of the liver-specific microRNA, miR-122 to the viral 5’ untranslated region (5’UTR) (12), and miR-122 similarly binds the EqHV 5’UTR (13,14). Infection kinetics are also similar between EqHV in horses and HCV in humans, including rapid onset of viremia and delayed seroconversion (7,9). EqHV infection in adult horses led to 43–100% clearance within 6 months (n=3–12) (7–9), which is higher than the 15–45% observed for HCV (15). It appears that foals are more prone to chronicity, as 6/6 experimental infections persisted (7,10). Only one study characterized the immune response to EqHV infection (9), and found possible evidence of EqHV-specific CD8 T cell responses in 1/3 horses. Viral clearance resulted in non-sterilizing immunity to rechallenge inoculations in 2 horses. For HCV, transcriptomic analyses of peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) and liver samples of infected humans and chimpanzees demonstrated strong interferon (IFN) responses associated with viral clearance, while T cell exhaustion often is associated with chronicity (16–19). Understanding equine immune responses to EqHV could provide insights critical to understand hepaciviral pathogenesis and offer immune correlates relevant for HCV vaccine development. Here, we aimed to characterize the course of experimental EqHV infection with an emphasis on the nature of antiviral immunity and pathology associated with clearance and protection from re-infection, and to characterize gene expression changes in the liver and periphery.
Materials and Methods
Animals
All animal procedures were approved by the Cornell University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and horses received humane care according to the “Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals”. Horses were median 4 years old (range, 2 – 8), 5 geldings and 3 mares. Breeds included Morgan Horse (2), Warmblood (2), Arabian (1), Thoroughbred (1), Thoroughbred-Quarter Horse cross (1), and Quarter Horse (1). Horses were confirmed EqHV and equine parvovirus-hepatitis (EqPV-H) serum RNA/DNA and antibody (NS3 or NS1) negative, as previously described (20), and healthy by physical examination, complete blood counts, and serum biochemistry, including markers of liver function. Horses were again confirmed EqPV-H negative at the completion of the study.
Inoculations and sample collection
Horses were inoculated intravenously (i.v.) with 5 mL of 107 genome equivalents (GE)/mL acute phase NZP1 strain serum (6). Physical examination was performed at each blood draw. Horses were rechallenged i.v. with the same NZP1 inoculum at 6 months, then with 1 mL of 5 ×107 GE/mL of the divergent CU strain serum one month later. Two horses were followed for an additional year and rechallenged again with the CU strain.
Serum was collected at week −1, days 0, 1, and 3, and weekly thereafter for 34 weeks. PBMC were collected at weeks −1, 0, and 1 and then every other week for 26 weeks and prepared by Ficoll density gradient, as previously described (20), for flow cytometry. At each collection, additional aliquots of 3.5 × 106 cells were lysed in Trizol and stored at −80°C until RNA extraction for RNA sequencing (RNA-seq). Monthly, additional aliquots were cryopreserved in 90% FBS, 10% DMSO for ELISPOT analysis. For one horse (horse N), fresh PBMC aliquots collected at weeks 0 and 2 were submitted for single cell (sc)RNA-seq.
Ultrasound-guided transcutaneous liver biopsy was performed with 14-gauge 11.4 cm Tru-Cut biopsy needles (Medline Industries, Northfield IL, USA) under sedation with i.v. xylazine and local anesthesia with 2% lidocaine. Biopsies were fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin for histopathology or stored in RNAlater at −80°C for RNA-seq.
One naïve horse (horse O) was administered CU inoculum to demonstrate infectivity of this inoculum. Serum was collected weekly until viral clearance.
Sample analysis
Weekly serum biochemistry, EqHV reverse transcription (RT)-qPCR, and serology by luciferase immunoprecipitation system (LIPS) was performed. Serum miR-122 quantification was performed pre-infection and at peak hepatitis. Flow cytometric phenotyping of PBMCs was performed bi-weekly. RNA-Seq on PBMC and liver biopsies, and histopathology on liver biopsies were performed pre-inoculation (PRE), during early acute infection (ACUTE), near seroconversion (SC), during falling viremia or hepatitis (FV, HEP), and at week 26 (POST) (Fig. 1A, Supporting Fig. S1). Hepatitis, or liver injury, was determined by elevation above reference interval of any of the following circulating liver markers: sorbitol dehydrogenase, SDH; glutamate dehydrogenase, GLDH; aspartate aminotransferase, AST; gamma-glutamyl transferase, GGT; bile acids; or direct bilirubin. Libraries for RNA-seq and scRNA-seq were prepared as described in Supporting Text S2.
Descriptive statistics are provided as median and range. Mixed effects analysis with horse as a random effect and Dunnett’s post hoc tests were performed on clinical parameters. Significance was set at p < 0.05. Differential expression for RNA-Seq data was analyzed in R Studio using Limma and Voom packages as previously described (21). Detailed methods and analyses are provided in Supporting Text S2.
Results
To characterize the course of infection and immune responses to EqHV, seven adult horses were inoculated with strain NZP1 virus, originating from a molecular clone (6). Primary timepoints for the samples analyzed are shown in Figure 1A and Supporting Figure S1.
EqHV has a low chronicity rate in horses
After primary inoculation, all horses became viremic within one to three days. Peak viremia developed by a median of 1 week with titers of 107 to 108 GE/mL serum. Viremia became undetectable by 15.5 (5–19) weeks in 6 out of 7 horses (86%) (Fig. 1B), and liver viral load reflected viremia (Fig. 1C). Horse J had a markedly shorter duration of viremia, more similar to rechallenge infections (described below). Horse D had multiple re-occurring phases of detectable viremia (Fig. 1B), which could not be explained by natural re-infection e.g. from co-housing. Sequence analysis further suggested either recrudescence or persistent infection for horse D (Supporting Fig. S3). Thus, primary infection predominantly led to an acute resolving outcome.
At the time of enrollment, horses R and J were naturally and experimentally (20) infected with equine pegivirus (EPgV) −1 and −2 (previously Theiler’s disease associated virus; TDAV), respectively. EPgVs, like human HPgV/GBV-C are highly prevalent, clinically silent, and can persistently infect the bone marrow (20). Here, we observed a transient reduction in EPgV titers upon EqHV infection. Interestingly, horses J and R cleared their persistent EPgV infection concomitantly and within 6 weeks of EqHV clearance, respectively (Supporting Fig. S4). Hence, unrelated general immune activation might play a role in the typical sudden clearance of persistent pegivirus infection. Alternatively, given shared peptide sequences, a role for epitopes conserved between EqHV and EPgV cannot be excluded (Supporting Table S5) (22).
Prior EqHV infection provides partial immune protection
Twenty-six weeks after primary inoculation, all horses except horse D were rechallenged i.v. with the same NZP1 strain. Three horses (A, B and P) experienced short-lived viremia for less than 2 weeks and titers 2–3 logs lower compared to primary infection. Horse J had borderline detectable viremia (Fig. 1D). Four to 6 weeks after homologous rechallenge, the 6 horses were rechallenged with highly divergent heterologous serum from a persistently infected horse (CU strain). Two horses (N and R) experienced re-infection with duration of less than 3 weeks and ~1 log lower viremia compared to primary infections (Fig. 1D). No horses became viremic from both rechallenge inoculations. One year later, horses N and P, were rechallenged with the CU inoculum. Both horses became viremic with slightly longer viremia lasting ~3 weeks (Fig. 1D). In summary, clearance of primary infection resulted in broad non-sterilizing immunity that reduced viremia levels and duration, and this partial immune protection lasted at least a year.
EqHV infection causes subclinical hepatitis
Hepatitis, as determined by elevated circulating liver markers, began a median of 4 (1–14) weeks after primary inoculation, and lasted for a median of 8 (4–16) weeks. Hepatitis was mild and subclinical (Fig. 2A, Supporting Fig. S6A), consistent with mild liver injury. Since enhanced miR-122 serum levels can be observed during other types of acute and chronic liver injury (23), we measured serum miR-122 levels and found a significant increase for all 7 horses during peak hepatitis (p < 0.001, Fig. 2A), as well as a significant association with serum AST (p = 0.0499; Supporting Fig. S6B). Measurement of miR-122 levels over time for two horses showed that miR-122 was >250–1250% of baseline while other markers remained near baseline (Supporting Fig. S6C). Thus, miR-122 serves as a marker of acute hepacivirus induced liver damage in horses as well, and appears more sensitive compared to other markers.
Subclinical hepatitis was not a significant feature during rechallenge inoculations. No horse developed hepatitis during NZP1 rechallenge, and one developed mild hepatitis during CU rechallenge (horse R, peak GLDH 438% of reference interval, all other liver markers within reference intervals).
Anti-NS3 seroconversion precedes viral clearance
To understand humoral immune responses, we analyzed antibodies to the viral nonstructural protein, NS3, which is among the most conserved regions of the polyprotein. Although anti-envelope protein responses would be of interest as a potential marker of neutralization potential, their measurement has proven less robust, either for technical reasons or due to lower immunogenicity (24). Horses seroconverted to NS3 at 7 (1–11) weeks after inoculation (Fig. 2B, Supporting Fig. S6A). Horse J showed markedly shorter time to seroconversion, suggestive of an anamnestic response. The timing of seroconversion did not correlate to the onset of hepatitis (Pearson r2 = 0.017, p = 0.78), whereas it always preceded viral clearance by 7.5 (4–12) weeks (Pearson r2 = 0.74, p = 0.027) (Fig. 2B). Antibody titers slowly waned over time, but increased after productive rechallenge inoculations (Supporting Fig. S7).
Little evidence for selection of immune escape variants
HCV continuously evolves to avoid adaptive immunity (25). Here, for the NZP1 inoculum and for most acute phase samples, only minimal variation from the consensus sequence was observed (Fig. 3A, Supporting Figs. S3 and S8A). While low frequency variants (0.1–20%) accumulated over time, non-synonymous changes to the consensus sequence were observed only for horse J during its short acute infection: A688V in E2 and I889V in NS2 (Fig. 3A). In homologous rechallenge samples analyzed from two horses (A and P), two complete changes in E2 (M409L, L502P) and two ~50% changes in NS5A-B (G2006S, E2682G) were observed for horse P (Fig. 3A), while none were observed for horse A (Supporting Fig. S8A). Evidence of immune pressure on residue 409 was observed already at day 65 of the primary infection in horse P (Fig. 3A). The non-synonymous changes for horses J and P likely represented attempts to escape pre-existing immunity.
The CU inoculum differed by 161 amino acids from the NZP1 strain (94.5% identity), and was highly diverse, consisting of three sub-populations (Fig. 3A–C, Supporting Fig. S8B). Major non-synonymous variation was found in E1, E2, NS2 and NS5A (Fig. 3D), with particular variation in the E2 N-terminus, corresponding to the HCV hypervariable region 1 (HVR1) (26), but also in downstream E2 regions (Fig. 3E, Supporting Fig. S8C). Interestingly, after rechallenge of horse R, sub-population CUII dominated, whereas sub-populations CUII and CUIII were selected in horse N and all sub-populations were present in horse P after the 1-year rechallenge. After CU inoculation of a naïve horse O, sub-population CUIII was selected.
In summary, EqHV sequences were stable over time and we saw little evidence of selection of escape variants to adaptive immunity, including for the presumed low-level persistently infected horse D.
No major changes in PBMC populations during EqHV infection
To monitor cellular immune responses to EqHV infection, complete blood count and flow cytometric phenotyping of PBMCs were performed. Overall, no significant differences were observed in any PBMC population over the 26 weeks after primary inoculation (Fig. 4, Supporting Fig. S9). Total T cells (Fig. 4A) and in particular CD4 T cells (Fig, 4B) comprised the largest PBMC sub-populations and showed little variation over time. While some horses showed prominent expansion of smaller sub-populations at single timepoints (Fig. 4; B cells in horse J, monocytes in horse R, and Ki67+ T cells in horse B), these findings were not consistent across animals and timepoints. Similar variation was observed in the horses after viral clearance (Supporting Fig. S9), suggesting natural or technical variability.
To reveal potential changes to cellular gene expression not affecting cell frequency, we performed poly(A) specific RNA-seq on PBMCs at PRE, ACUTE, SC, FV and POST timepoints. No significant differentially expressed (DE) genes were detected at any timepoint among the 6 resolving horses. To address changes to minor cell type populations, we further performed scRNA-seq on horse N at the PRE and ACUTE timepoints. The ACUTE timepoint was chosen as near peak viremia, when a strong interferon response might be expected. This analysis resolved equine PBMC sub-populations in great depth (21) (Fig. 5A,B). Nonetheless, no infection-mediated differences in cell population proportions (Fig. 5C) and only minimal differences in gene expression (Fig. 5D) were observed, corroborating the bulk RNA-seq analysis.
Analysis of EqHV-specific T cells
To detect EqHV-specific T cells, we stimulated PBMCs with three peptide pools spanning the complete NZP1 NS3 protein. A significant but variable increase in the frequency of EqHV-specific IFN-γ producing T cells after infection or reinfection was observed in all 7 horses (Fig. 6). In four horses (B, D, N and P), the first robust production of EqHV-specific T cells was detected around the time of seroconversion. In horse A, T cells appeared early during infection (4 weeks) and persisted through the study. Horse R only had minimal responses during the entire course of primary infection. Horse J in particular had evidence of pre-existing anti-EqHV specific T cells. Combined with its rapid clearance of infection (Fig. 1B), early seroconversion (Fig. 2B, Supporting Fig. S6A, S7), and rapid viral sequence changes (Fig. 3A) this would be consistent with previous EqHV exposure. An increased number of EqHV-specific T cells was seen after clearance (FV) for horses B, J and P, or after productive rechallenge in accordance with a recall T cell response for horse A, N and R. Interestingly, no T cell expansion was observed after productive rechallenge of horses B, J, or P.
Liver histopathology is characterized by necrotic hepatocytes and T cell infiltrates
HCV causes lymphocytic necroinflammation during acute infection in humans (27). Here, PRE liver histology was normal, except in horses B (fibrosis) and N (cholangitis) (Supporting Fig. S10). These histologic findings were distinctly different from findings during EqHV infection in the other horses. During viremia (ACUTE, SC) and HEP, lesions suggestive of viral infection were evident in all 7 horses, including increased numbers of sinusoidal T cells (Fig. 7A,B), portal lymphocytic infiltrates with some breaching of the limiting plate, and small nodules of lymphocytes, neutrophils, and dendritic cells in the parenchyma. Samples from four horses had individual necrotic hepatocytes with lymphocytic satellitosis and fewer neutrophils (Fig. 7C). Horse D had active hepatitis at the POST timepoint, associated with recrudescence of EqHV. There was significant lymphocyte infiltration across all timepoints in portal tracts (p = 0.045, Fig. 7D), but not sinusoids (p = 0.095, Fig. 7E). Fibrosis was not a significant feature (Supporting Fig. S10).
Liver transcriptional responses reveal signatures of innate immune responses
To assess intrahepatic transcriptome responses, total RNA-seq was performed on PRE, ACUTE, SC, FV and POST infection liver biopsies from resolving horses. In a multiple comparison F-test for five resolving horses (horse B excluded for technical reasons), 46 host genes were significantly (FDR<0.1) up-regulated and 1 down-regulated at any timepoint compared to PRE (Fig. 8A). The strongest response was at the ACUTE and FV timepoints (Fig. 8B). Among the 47 DE genes (Fig. 8C, Supporting Fig. S11A), 14 were IFN-stimulated genes (ISGs) (28) and others were consistent with an increase in leukocytes (IL2RG, CXCR4, CD68, GPNMB, MPEG1). The week 5 (FV) and 27 (POST/second FV) samples from horse D both represented timepoints of falling viremia, and resembled the FV timepoint for other horses (Fig. 8C). Viral RNA was significant in our analysis and followed intrahepatic RT-qPCR data, with a 100-fold excess of (+) to (–) strand reads (Fig. 8C, Supporting Fig. S11A–C). Among rechallenge samples, horse R, taken during peak viremia and hepatitis and within a week of clearance, showed strong responses; horse P, taken within a week of clearance, showed intermediate responses; whereas horse A, taken two weeks after the last positive serum sample, showed no responses (Fig. 8C). An overlap of genes, in particular among ISGs, was found with acute phase liver samples of HCV-infected chimpanzees (17) or humans (18), liver transplant organs becoming HCV infected post transplantation (19), and rodent hepacivirus (RHV)-infected rats (29) (Fig. 8C). Genes upregulated at the ACUTE and FV timepoints were significantly enriched for ISGs (Fig. 8D). Gene ontology (GO) analysis across the 46 genes upregulated at any timepoint showed enrichment for response to virus, exogenous RNA, and innate immunity (Fig. 8E). For the ACUTE timepoint, terms associated with immune response, antigen presentation and chemokine activity were enriched, suggesting antigen presentation in the liver taking place already at this time. Down-regulated genes at the ACUTE timepoint were enriched for GO terms associated with normal cell and liver function (Supporting Fig. S11D). In summary, acute resolving EqHV infection was consistent with signatures of innate immunity and antigen presentation in the liver.
EqHV infection functionally sequesters miR-122 in vivo
In addition to the direct role of miR-122 in supporting HCV replication, in vitro studies show that HCV sequesters enough miR-122 to deplete the available cellular pool and cause functional de-repression of mRNAs normally repressed by miR-122 (30). Here, we intriguingly found that cellular mRNAs normally repressed by miR-122, i.e. harboring a miR-122 7- or 8-mer seed site in their 3’UTR, were significantly upregulated at ACUTE and SC timepoints of EqHV infection, consistent with de-repression (Fig. 8F). Upregulation was less pronounced at FV, and no difference was seen at the POST timepoint. MiRNA specific de-repression was not observed for other abundant miRNAs (Fig. 8F, Supporting Fig. S11E–I). These data represent the first functional miRNA sequestration by an RNA virus observed in vivo, and emphasize the functional importance of this intriguing RNA-based mechanism of gene regulation. This might have particular relevance for HCV-induced liver cancer, in that miR-122 is a tumor suppressor (31).
Discussion
EqHV infection of horses could serve as an animal model to understand fundamental aspects of intrahepatic immune responses that can protect against, or lead to clearance of, hepaciviral infection, and thus could be of direct relevance for design of HCV vaccine candidates. Here we observed a clinical course similar to previous reports (7–9), with a low chronicity rate and subclinical hepatitis as the primary outcome. Importantly, the inoculum and study animals were negative for EqPV-H, a recently discovered hepatitis virus of horses (32), which due to its recent discovery was not accounted for in previous studies (7–9). Histopathologic changes in horses were similar to acute HCV in humans, with lymphocytic infiltrate and some hepatocyte necrosis. A recent report of liver disease associated with chronic EqHV infection also showed similarities to chronic HCV infection in humans (11). Thus, EqHV also appears to be of clinical importance in equine medicine and warrants further study.
The initial goal of an HCV vaccine is to prevent chronicity while accepting acute resolving infection (33). Indeed, resolving infection was the primary outcome of EqHV infection in this and previous studies (6–9), providing an opportunity to characterize the immune responses leading to viral clearance and protection from challenge infections, which is difficult to study for other species of hepacivirus, where chronicity is the primary outcome. Clearance was associated with prior seroconversion and elevated circulating liver markers. This included elevated serum miR-122, which we established as a novel marker of hepatitis during acute hepacivirus infection. Given its high sequence conservation, miR-122 may be particularly attractive for studies in non-model organisms. Despite no major changes in PBMC populations, EqHV-specific T cell responses were observed in all horses and expanded during rechallenge, and therefore likely contributed to clearance. Therefore, further study of immune responses to EqHV could yield valuable information on protective immunity to hepaciviruses. Importantly, primary infection with NZP1 provided broad protection against homologous and heterologous rechallenges.
Protective immunity waned over time, with longer duration of re-infection when rechallenged after 1 year. This correlated with observations for HCV in chimpanzees and GBV-B in tamarins (34,35). Declining antibody titers were also previously observed in horses (7). This might explain how horses J and O could be NS3-seronegative before inoculation, although progressing with a clinical course consistent with previous infection. Since only NS3 antibodies were assessed, these horses could have developed responses to other viral proteins, as observed for HCV (36). Such recurrent infections throughout the life of a horse could explain the high seropositivity rates reported (30–40%) (8,37).
Although HCV rapidly evolves to escape immune pressure and establish persistence (25), we observed little evidence of immune evasion in primarily resolving EqHV infection. Non-synonymous changes in horses J (primary infection) and P (rechallenge) might represent adaptive immunity induced selection, which, however, did not lead to escape. Escape mutations were also not observed for horse D, which was persistently infected for at least 7 months. Our study therefore did not allow evaluation of viral escape in persistently infected horses. We did, however, find that EqHV sequence diversity was particularly high in the N-terminus of the E2 protein, suggesting the existence of an HVR1 similar to that of HCV (26). For HCV, HVR1 plays a role in viral immune evasion (26).
Compared to acute HCV infection, equine immune response to EqHV showed similarities in intrahepatic responses, but notable differences in peripheral responses. We observed no major changes in PBMC populations, phenotypes, or gene expression in acute resolving horses, whereas PBMCs from acutely HCV infected patients showed a strong innate response with type I IFN and inflammatory gene signatures and a possible reduction in B cells (16). In contrast, equine liver transcriptomic responses were similar to hepacivirus-infected human, chimpanzee, and rat liver (17–19,29), with strong innate immune responses. Whereas we observed a transcriptome signature suggestive of dendritic cell or macrophage antigen presentation during early acute infection, the lymphocytic infiltrate observed on IHC during seroconversion and hepatitis was not strongly reflected in transcriptomic data. The study may be underpowered to clearly detect this, or the abundant RNA in hepatocytes may have overshadowed any leukocyte signal. Overall, the similar liver response between horses and humans for EqHV and HCV infections, respectively, suggests that horses are likely to be a useful outbred surrogate animal model for intrahepatic pathology and immune responses to HCV. An additional benefit of horses over rodent models is that longitudinal liver tissue from a single animal is readily accessible, allowing multi-timepoint analyses, as exemplified here.
HCV sequestration of miR-122, at least in vitro, can lead to indirect gene regulation through miRNA “sponging” (30). This is of particular interest, given that miR-122 is a tumor suppressor, and that miR-122 knock-out mice spontaneously develop HCV-like liver disease (31). Here, we find miR-122-specific de-repression of cellular mRNAs upon EqHV infection of the liver and strong correlation with viral load in the liver. Although a causative effect cannot be established, this is the first demonstration of functional miRNA sequestration by an RNA virus in vivo. These findings emphasize a putative functional importance of this RNA-based mechanism in the cause of liver pathology as a result of hepaciviral infection.
We noted that co-infecting pegiviruses in two cases were cleared concomitantly with the superinfecting EqHV. This was preceded by a transient reduction in EPgV titers upon EqHV infection, which was similar to observations with simian pegivirus (SPgV)-infected macaques superinfected with simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) (38). These findings suggest that general innate immune activation incurred by other infections, such as EqHV, might explain the spontaneous clearance of pegiviruses even years after infection (39). Indeed, concomitant clearance of HPgV and HCV infection was observed in patients after therapeutically administrated IFN-α (40). It cannot be excluded, however, that the peptide sequences of up to nine amino acid residues shared between EqHV and EPgVs are targets of adaptive immunity, as demonstrated for HCV and influenza virus (22). Whereas interference was observed between different strains of HCV, or HCV and HBV competing for the same liver cells (41), co-infection mediated concomitant viral clearance in unrelated tissues was not previously reported and should be explored further.
In summary, our findings suggest an equine immune response more competent in clearing infection compared to human immune responses to HCV. Thus, EqHV infection in horses could provide a useful model to understand drivers of hepacivirus clearance, and consequently, for development of HCV vaccines. We uncovered a primarily hepatic response driving viral clearance, and our findings reveal the first specifics of, particularly innate, immune responses linked to resolving infection. The change and waning of these responses over time should be a focus for further understanding of hepaciviral immunity. Although RHV models similarly mirror HCV infection and will be highly useful (4), EqHV could be an important parallel system to understand hepaciviral pathology and immune responses, especially due to its closer genetic relatedness to HCV and suitability for within-animal longitudinal sampling. Additionally, EqHV is a significant equine pathogen, thereby improving our understanding of equine liver disease.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge Mason Jager for his assistance with histology figure preparation, Cornell University Biotechnology Resource Center for sequencing, Department of Clinical Microbiology, Hvidovre Hospital for access to sequencing equipment, and members of the authors’ laboratories for support and fruitful discussion.
Financial support: This study was supported by grants from the Agriculture and Food Research Initiative Competitive Grant no. 2016-67015-24765 from the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture, the Jack Lowe Equine Health Funds/Mollie Wilmot Equine Research Fund, the European Research Council (ERC Starting Grant 802899 to T.K.H.S), Independent Research Fund Denmark (6110-00595 and 6111-00314 to T.K.H.S. and 4004-00598 to J.B.), the Novo Nordisk Foundation (NNF15OC0017404 to T.K.H.S. and NNF18OC0055462 to J.B.), the Lundbeck Foundation (R192-2015-1154 to T.K.H.S), the Danish Cancer Society (R204-A12639 to J.B.) and the Weimann Foundation (to T.K.H.S. and U.F.). J.E.T. was supported by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases of the National Institutes of Health under Award number K08AI141767. R.W. was supported by an Early Postdoc.Mobility Fellowship (P2BEP3_178527) and a Postdoc.Mobility Fellowship (P400PB_183952) from the Swiss National Science Foundation. Additional support for B.R.R. and R.S.P from the Department of Microbiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the funders, including the National Institutes of Health.
Abbreviations:
- EqHV
Equine hepacivirus
- HCV
hepatitis C virus
- GBV-B
GB-virus B
- NPHV
non-primate hepacivirus
- UTR
untranslated region
- PBMC
peripheral blood mononuclear cell
- IFN
interferon
- GE
genome equivalents
- RNA-seq
RNA-sequencing
- scRNA-seq
single cell RNA-sequencing
- LIPS
luciferase immunoprecipitation system
- EPgV
equine pegivirus
- TDAV
Theiler’s disease associated virus
- HPgV/GBV-C
human pegivirus
- DE
differentially expressed
- ISGs
IFN-stimulated genes
- RHV
rodent hepacivirus
- SPgV
simian pegivirus
- SIV
simian immunodeficiency virus
- LLOQ
lower level of quantification
- FC
fold change
- SFU
spot forming units
References
- 1.Blum HE. History and Global Burden of Viral Hepatitis. Dig. Dis 2016;34:293–302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bukh J Animal models for the study of hepatitis C virus infection and related liver disease. Gastroenterology [Internet]. 2012;142:1279–1287. Available from: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.02.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Hartlage AS, Cullen JM, Kapoor A. The Strange, Expanding World of Animal Hepaciviruses. Annu Rev Virol. 2016;3:53–75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Hartlage AS, Murthy S, Kumar A, Trivedi S, Dravid P, Sharma H, et al. Vaccination to prevent T cell subversion can protect against persistent hepacivirus infection. Nat. Commun [Internet]. 2019;10:1–11. Available from: 10.1038/s41467-019-09105-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kapoor A, Simmonds P, Gerold G, Qaisar N, Jain K, Henriquez JA, et al. Characterization of a canine homolog of hepatitis C virus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci [Internet]. 2011;108:11608–11613. Available from: http://www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1101794108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Scheel TKH, Kapoor A, Nishiuchi E, Brock KV., Yu Y, Andrus L, et al. Characterization of nonprimate hepacivirus and construction of a functional molecular clone. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A [Internet]. 2015;112:2192–2197. Available from: http://www.pnas.org/lookup/doi/10.1073/pnas.1500265112 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ramsay JD, Evanoff R, Wilkinson TE, Divers TJ, Knowles DP, Mealey RH. Experimental transmission of equine hepacivirus in horses as a model for hepatitis C virus. Hepatology. 2015;61:1533–1546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Pfaender S, Cavalleri JMV, Walter S, Doerrbecker J, Campana B, Brown RJP, et al. Clinical course of infection and viral tissue tropism of hepatitis C virus-like nonprimate hepaciviruses in horses. Hepatology. 2015;61:447–459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Pfaender S, Walter S, Grabski E, Todt D, Bruening J, Romero-brey I, et al. Immune protection against reinfection with nonprimate hepacivirus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci 2017;114:E2430–E2439. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Gather T, Walter S, Pfaender S, Todt D, Feige K, Steinmann E, et al. Acute and chronic infections with nonprimate hepacivirus in young horses. Vet. Res [Internet]. 2016;47:97. Available from: http://veterinaryresearch.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13567-016-0381-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Tegtmeyer B, Echelmeyer J, Pfankuche VM, Puff C, Todt D, Fischer N, et al. Chronic equine hepacivirus infection in an adult gelding with severe hepatopathy. Vet. Med. Sci 2019;372–378. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Sarnow P, Sagan SM. Unraveling the Mysterious Interactions Between Hepatitis C Virus RNA and Liver-Specific MicroRNA-122. Annu. Rev. Virol 2016;3:309–332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Yu Y, Scheel TKH, Luna JM, Chung H, Nishiuchi E, Scull MA, et al. miRNA independent hepacivirus variants suggest a strong evolutionary pressure to maintain miR-122 dependence. PLoS Pathog. 2017;13:1–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Tanaka T, Kasai H, Yamashita A, Okuyama-Dobashi K, Yasumoto J, Maekawa S, et al. Hallmarks of hepatitis C virus in equine hepacivirus. J. Virol [Internet]. 2014;88:13352–13366. Available from: http://jvi.asm.org/cgi/doi/10.1128/JVI.02280-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Hoofnagle JH. Course and outcome of hepatitis C. Hepatology. 2002;36:s21–s29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Rosenberg BR, Depla M, Freije CA, Gaucher D, Mazouz S, Boisvert M, et al. Longitudinal transcriptomic characterization of the immune response to acute hepatitis C virus infection in patients with spontaneous viral clearance. PLOS Pathog. [Internet]. 2018;14:e1007290. Available from: http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1007290 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Yu C, Boon D, McDonald SL, Myers TG, Tomioka K, Nguyen H, et al. Pathogenesis of Hepatitis E Virus and Hepatitis C Virus in Chimpanzees: Similarities and Differences. J. Virol 2010;84:11264–11278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Dill MT, Makowska Z, Duong FHT, Merkofer F, Filipowicz M, Baumert TF, et al. Interferon-γstimulated genes, but not USP18, are expressed in livers of patients with acute hepatitis C. Gastroenterology [Internet]. 2012;143:777–786.e6. Available from: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.05.044 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Peng X, Li Y, Walters KA, Rosenzweig ER, Lederer SL, Aicher LD, et al. Computational identification of hepatitis C virus associated microRNA-mRNA regulatory modules in human livers. BMC Genomics. 2009;10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Tomlinson JE, Wolfisberg R, Fahnøe U, Sharma H, Renshaw RW, Nielsen L, et al. Equine pegiviruses cause persistent infection of bone marrow and are not associated with hepatitis. PLoS Pathog. [Internet]. 2020;16:e1008677. Available from: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1008677 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Patel RS, Tomlinson JE, Divers TJ, Van de Walle GR, Rosenberg BR. Single-cell resolution landscape of equine peripheral blood mononuclear cells reveals diverse cell types including T-bet+ B cells. BMC Biol. [Internet]. 202119, 1–18; doi: 10.1186/s12915-020-00947-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Wedemeyer H, Mizukoshi E, Davis AR, Bennink JR, Rehermann B. Cross-Reactivity between Hepatitis C Virus and Influenza A Virus Determinant-Specific Cytotoxic T Cells. J. Virol 2001;75:11392–11400. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Schueller F, Roy S, Vucur M, Trautwein C, Luedde T, Roderburg C. The role of miRNAs in the pathophysiology of liver diseases and toxicity. Int. J. Mol. Sci 2018;19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Pfaender S, Walter S, Todt D, Behrendt P, Doerrbecker J, Wölk B, et al. Assessment of cross-species transmission of hepatitis C virus-related non-primate hepacivirus in a population of humans at high risk of exposure. J. Gen. Virol 2015;96:2636–2642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.von Hahn T, Yoon JC, Alter H, Rice CM, Rehermann B, Balfe P, et al. Hepatitis C Virus Continuously Escapes From Neutralizing Antibody and T-Cell Responses During Chronic Infection In Vivo. Gastroenterology. 2007;132:667–678. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Prentoe J, Bukh J. Hypervariable Region 1 in Envelope Protein 2 of Hepatitis C Virus: A Linchpin in Neutralizing Antibody Evasion and Viral Entry. Front. Immunol 2018;9:2146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Dhingra S, Ward SC, Thung SN. Liver pathology of hepatitis C, beyond grading and staging of the disease. World J. Gastroenterol 2016;22:1357–1366. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Dittmann M, Hoffmann HH, Scull MA, Gilmore RH, Bell KL, Ciancanelli M, et al. A serpin shapes the extracellular environment to prevent influenza a virus maturation. Cell [Internet]. 2015;160:631–643. Available from: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.01.040 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Trivedi S, Murthy S, Sharma H, Hartlage AS, Kumar A, Gadi S V., et al. Viral persistence, liver disease, and host response in a hepatitis C–like virus rat model. Hepatology. 2018;68:435–448. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Luna JM, Scheel TKH, Rice CM, Darnell RB, Luna JM, Scheel TKH, et al. Article Hepatitis C Virus RNA Functionally Sequesters miR-122. Cell [Internet]. 2015;160:1099–1110. Available from: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.02.025 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Hsu S, Wang B, Kota J, Yu J, Costinean S, Kutay H, et al. Essential metabolic, anti-inflammatory, and anti-tumorigenic functions of miR-122 in liver. J. Clin. Invest 2012;122:2871–2883. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Divers TJ, Tennant BC, Kumar A, McDonough S, Cullen JM, Bhuva N, et al. A new parvovirus associated with serum hepatitis in horses following inoculation of a common equine biological. Emerg. Infect. Dis 2018;24:303–310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Walker CM. Designing an HCV vaccine: a unique convergence of prevention and therapy? Curr. Opin. Virol 2017;23:113–119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Bukh J, Thimme R, Meunier J-C, Faulk K, Spangenberg HC, Chang K-M, et al. Previously Infected Chimpanzees Are Not Consistently Protected against Reinfection or Persistent Infection after Reexposure to the Identical Hepatitis C Virus Strain. J. Virol 2008;82:8183–8195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Bukh J, Engle RE, Govindarajan S, Purcell RH. Immunity Against the GBV-B Hepatitis Virus in Tamarins Can Prevent Productive Infection Following Rechallenge and Is Long-Lived. J. Med. Virol 2008;80:87–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Al Dhahry SHS, Daar S, Nograles JC, Rajapakse SMWWB, Al Toqi FSS, Kaminski GZ. Fluctuating antibody response in a cohort of hepatitis C patients. Sultan Qaboos Univ. Med. J 2002;4:33–38. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Burbelo PD, Dubovi EJ, Simmonds P, Medina JL, Henriquez JA, Mishra N, et al. Serology-Enabled Discovery of Genetically Diverse Hepaciviruses in a New Host. J. Virol [Internet]. 2012;86:6171–6178. Available from: http://jvi.asm.org/cgi/doi/10.1128/JVI.00250-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Bailey AL, Buechler CR, Matson DR, Peterson EJ, Brunner KG, Mohns MS, et al. Pegivirus avoids immune recognition but does not attenuate acute-phase disease in a macaque model of HIV infection. PLoS Pathog. [Internet]. 2017;13:1–20. Available from: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006692 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Stapleton JT, Foung S, Muerhoff AS, Bukh J, Simmonds P. The GB viruses: A review and proposed classification of GBV-A, GBV-C (HGV), and GBV-D in genus Pegivirus within the family Flaviviridae. J. Gen. Virol 2011;92:233–246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Schwarze-Zander C, Blackard JT, Zheng H, Addo MM, Lin W, Robbins GK, et al. GB Virus C (GBV-C) Infection in Hepatitis C Virus (HCV)/HIV–Coinfected Patients Receiving HCV Treatment: Importance of the GBV-C Genotype. J. Infect. Dis 2006;194:410–419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Melendez-Morales L, Konkle BA, Preiss L, Zhang M, Mathew P, Eyster ME, et al. Chronic hepatitis B and other correlates of spontaneous clearance of hepatitis C virus among HIV-infected people with hemophilia. Aids. 2007;21:1631–1636. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Nation PN. Alsike clover poisoning: A review. Can. Vet. J 1989;30:410–415. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.