Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Dec 16.
Published in final edited form as: ACS Bio Med Chem Au. 2021 Sep 10;1(1):31–43. doi: 10.1021/acsbiomedchemau.1c00021

A Stable Gold Nanoparticle-Based Vaccine for the Targeted Delivery of Tumor-Associated Glycopeptide Antigens

Kevin R Trabbic 1, Kristopher A Kleski 1, Joseph J Barchi Jr 1
PMCID: PMC8675876  NIHMSID: NIHMS1729702  PMID: 34927166

Abstract

We have developed a novel antigen delivery system based on polysaccharide-coated gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) targeted to antigen presenting cells (APCs) expressing Dectin-1. AuNPs were synthesized de-novo using yeast-derived β−1,3-glucans (B13G) as the reductant and passivating agent in a microwave-catalyzed procedure yielding highly uniform and serum-stable particles. These were further functionalized with both a peptide and a specific glycosylated form from the tandem repeat sequence of mucin 4 (MUC4), a glycoprotein overexpressed in pancreatic tumors. The glycosylated sequence contained the Thomsen-Friedenreich disaccharide, a pan-carcinoma, Tumor-Associated Carbohydrate Antigen (TACA), which has been a traditional target for antitumor vaccine design. These motifs were prepared with a cathepsin B protease cleavage site (Gly-Phe-Leu-Gly), loaded on the B13G-coated particles and these constructs were examined for Dectin-1 binding, APC processing and presentation in a model in vitro system and for immune responses in mice. We showed that these particles elicit strong in vivo immune responses through the production of both high-titer antibodies and priming of antigen-recognizing T-cells. Further examination showed that a favorable antitumor balance of expressed cytokines was generated, with limited expression of immunosuppressive Il-10. This system is modular in that any range of antigens can be conjugated to our particles and efficiently delivered to APCs expressing Dectin-1.

Graphical Abstract

graphic file with name nihms-1729702-f0001.jpg

INTRODUCTION

Tumor-associated carbohydrate antigens (TACAs) are glycan structures covalently attached to proteins or lipids in various forms on the surface of tumor cells.13 They differ from the normal cell glycan repertoire insofar as the tumor biosynthetic machinery is modified via a disparate regulation of glycosyltransferases and hydrolases. This produces aberrant and distinct cell-surface glycan structures that are unique to tumors, and these structures impart modified biophysical and protein binding characteristics to individual tumor types. In addition, some of these tumor-associated glycans can be recognized as “non-self” by the immune system (hence the moniker, “antigen”) eliciting both humoral and (sometimes) cell-mediated responses.4 As a result, there have been myriad attempts to prepare vaccine constructs to raise effective and durable immune responses to TACAs.514

The immune response to TACAs notwithstanding, they are composed of self-molecules, and hence are innately weak immunogens on their own. Carbohydrates are also T-cell independent epitopes and mobilization of that arm of the immune response is essential to eradicate any established tumor.11 It is thus not surprising that vaccine development against these antigens has been problematic; however, many strategies have met with success. The use of various delivery platforms5, 1518, conjugations to immunogenic proteins (KLH, Tetanus toxin)19 or peptide epitopes to generate T-cell help2023, covalent conjugation to Toll-like receptor agonists,7, 19, 21, 24 the use of various adjuvants25 and attachment to zwitterionic polysaccharides4, 26 have led to robust immune responses to carbohydrate structures and some have moved into clinical trials. However, none of these efforts have led to a truly effective, FDA approved therapy against any type of cancer.

Research into the use of different nanomaterials for a host of medical applications has exploded in recent years, and many of these applications are for some form of targeted drug delivery to treat various ailments in animal models. It follows that some of these same materials have been purposed as vaccine platforms to deliver antigens, adjuvant and T-cell epitopes, either alone or in some combinations to generate functional immune responses against disease.27 Along with applications to infectious diseases, the search for anticancer vaccines has spawned much work in this area. The list of nanomaterials employed is now quite extensive, and those include metallic nanoparticles, glycodendrimers, liposomes and natural materials.15, 28 Some examples of TACA/nanoparticle-based platforms for cancer immunotherapy include, 1) liposome and lipid-based particles,29 2) Metallic, and/or ferromagnetic particles3032, 3) synthetic biodegradable polymers or hydrogels33 and 4) Virus-Like Particles (VLPs).18, 34, 35 Of the metallic particles, gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) have emerged as the most versatile and hence most utilized for various therapeutic applications. They can be easily synthesized in a size selective manner and be coated with most any appropriately functionalized molecular family (proteins, small molecules, carbohydrates, lipids). These features led us to develop various AuNPs as either antitumor therapies or vaccines.3641 Our original vaccine platform utilized a complex mixture of a glycopeptide antigen and molecular adjuvant all coated on a gold nanoparticle where we added a spacer to reduce antigen density.37 The glycopeptide was derived from the tandem repeat unit of a mucin protein (MUC4) that is over/aberrantly expressed on pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDACs),42 and contained glycosylated serine or threonine residues containing the Thomsen Friedenreich (TF) antigen, a well-known TACA presented almost exclusively on tumor tissue.43, 44 This first generation produced a moderate antibody response and identified a lead glycopeptide that had superior antitumor properties relative to other epitopes used (unpublished data). This glycopeptide, where the TF disaccharide was attached to the serine at position 5, (which we call MUC4-TF-Ser(5)) was used to raise a monoclonal antibody (mAb) that we showed to be highly PDAC-specific.45 We sought to use this epitope in a redesigned AuNP platform that could be targeted to Antigen Presenting Cells (APC’s), such as macrophages and dendritic cells, while being versatile enough to allow further modifications with appropriate components to facilitate robust immune responses.

APC’s express a wide variety of receptors on their surface that facilitate binding and uptake of foreign antigens displayed on bacteria, viruses, fungi and tumors. These are sometime referred to as pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) as they recognize specific foreign antigens on microbes (so called Pathogen-Associated Molecular Patterns, PAMPs) as part of the innate immune response.46 Two categories of PRRs are the Toll-like receptors (TLRs) 47, 48 and the C-type lectins (CTLs), which are calcium-dependent carbohydrate binding proteins (CBPs).49 These specialized proteins all recognize distinct molecular patterns, each driving various cellular signaling events that lead to cytokine production, immune cell activation and mobilization. Both sets of receptors have been targeted to stimulate responses in antimicrobial or antitumor immunotherapy. Many CTLs have been targeted through conjugation of their cognate carbohydrate ligands onto various platforms as therapeutic strategies against infectious diseases and cancer. Some CTLs that have been targeted include Dendritic Cell-Specific Intercellular adhesion molecule-3-Grabbing Non-integrin (DC-SIGN)16, 50, the Mannose Receptor (MR)16, Macrophage-Galactose type C-type Lectin (MGL)5154 and the Dectins (1, 2 and 3).5557 Dectin-1 is a CTL that binds β−1,3-glucans (B13G), the most abundant polysaccharide in many fungal species; this engagement initiates signaling which is mediated through an intracellular immune-receptor tyrosine-based activation motif (ITAM).49 Tyrosine phosphorylation by Src-family kinases initiates a signaling cascade leading to NF-kB activation and the production of various inflammatory cytokines.49 In addition, targeting Dectin-1 with B13G has been a strategy to deliver antigens to APCs, as engagement with B13G initiates endocytosis leading to antigen presentation via MHC-II molecules.58 B13G have been widely used as immune stimulants for their ability to kick-start the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS,) inflammatory cytokines and microbial killing. The Dectin-1/B13G signaling system has been referred to as a bridge between innate and adaptive immunity.59

In this work we combined the strategy of using AuNPs as a delivery platform, but designed in such a way to target Dectin-1 on APCs via B13G; this would deliver glycopeptide antigens derived from tumor-associated mucins (vide supra) in an effort to generate a glycopeptide-specific immune response. The B13G polysaccharide was used as both the reductant and the stabilizing agent to create a platform that could further be coated with antigenic sequences. There have been several studies that have prepared AuNPs in this way using various naturally-derived gums and other saccharide components6063, as well as B13G.64, 65 However, none of these studies utilized the polysaccharide as a targeting agent. Here we report a simple synthetic strategy toward these multifunctional AuNPs to deliver glycopeptide antigens and raise potent immune response to these antigens as measured by antibody and cytokine production.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

We were encouraged from our previous study37 to pursue a refined AuNP platform for a vaccine that can deliver glycopeptide antigens derived from proteins that are overexpressed in tumors and display various covalently linked TACAs. There are a variety of carriers that have been studied, many based on inorganic nanoparticles or some type of “organic” nano-construction, e.g. from modified viruses (modified adenoviruses, bacteriophage and virus capsid proteins). However, due to the simplicity of AuNPs synthesis and manipulation it was decided to develop a modular AuNP system that could be delivered to APC’s easily and efficiently. We chose the Dectin-1/β−1,3-glucan system based on the following: 1) Dectin-1 is an atypical CLR in that is does not have a requirement for calcium66, and so activity would not be as sensitive to divalent metals; 2) Signaling through Dectin-1/β−1,3-glucan elicits the production of inflammatory cytokines that may skew the T-cell repertoire toward and antitumor response67 and 3) Many polysaccharides and gums have been used to prepare AuNPs62, 6870, as well as B13G, but they have not been utilized for TACA-containing glycopeptide antigen delivery. A schematic representation of our overall plan is shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Schematic representation of particle components (A); β−1,3-glucan (green), gold nanoparticle (gold) and MUC4 glycopeptide antigen (red/dark blue curved line; red = linker, blue = glycopeptide); tetrapeptide -GFLG- was inserted as a cathepsin B cleavage site. (B) Combined nanoparticle used for in vivo production of specific immune responses in mice.

Peptide/Glycopeptide/Linker Synthesis.

The synthesis of the various peptides and glycopeptides followed from our previous studies with slight modifications.37, 41 The linker was the same we used in our vaccine work since we had shown then and more recently45 that this was a robust and non-immunogenic motif to connect our antigens to nanoparticles. For this work, we used a CEM® Liberty PRIME Microwave peptide synthesizer to prepare all peptides. This instrument uses OxymaPure®/Diisopropylcarbodiimide activation with 2 min peptide coupling cycles at 90°C. Most glycoamino acid couplings were performed manually using conditions developed previously to minimize α-carbon amino acid epimerization.71 Those performed on the Liberty PRIME instrument included an equivalent of Hunig’s base (diisopropylethyl amine, DIEA) to offset the slightly acidic conditions afforded in Oxyma-activated amino acid couplings. Deprotection of the carbohydrate acetate groups was affected by treatment with 0.5 M sodium methoxide in methanol solution. All peptides were purified by reverse phase HPLC and characterized by ESI and MALDI mass spectrometry, as well as NMR spectroscopy (see Supporting Information)

Synthesis and Characterization of B13G-Coated AuNPs.

There is precedent for the de-novo preparation of AuNPs employing the reducing end of a polysaccharide to both reduce Au+3 to Au0 and simultaneous passivate the resulting particles with the oxidized polymer.62 As for other AuNP syntheses, relative concentration, temperature and reaction conditions will dictate the size and quality of the particles. The physical characteristics of the polysaccharide offer challenges, such as solubility and issues with interconverting tertiary structures and conformations. B13G are subject to these challenges; they assume triple helix structures in solution and often need high pH to denature and hence solubilize the polymers.7277 Our synthesis started with the dissolution of the B13G in 4 mM NaOH solution with heating under microwave irradiation. We found that use of microwaves to be essential for the efficient and high-quality synthesis of the nanoparticles. After dissolution of the B13G in base, and the addition of HAuCl4, the AuNPs form smoothly in about 90 min under microwave irradiation. The synthesis and select characterization data for B13G AuNPs and those coated with ovalbumin-derived peptides (as part of our in vitro model study, vide infra) are shown in Figure 2. The particles are very uniform by Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM, Figure 2A,B) and dynamic light scattering (DLS, Figure 2 C,D), with average core diameters of 15–17 nm and hydrodynamic diameters much larger at ~40 nm, indicative of a large, and possibly highly hydrated polymer coated on the particle surface.78 We found the procedure to be very reproducible and the batch-to-batch size measurements to be highly comparable. (see Supporting Information Figures S1S4)

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Representative characterization data for B13G-AuNPs and B13G-AuNPs conjugated with OVA peptides. (A) Transmission electron micrographs; (B) Size histograms for the TEM data in (A). (C) Dynamic light scattering volume distributions; (D) Hydrodynamic diameter of nanoparticles determined from DLS data in (C).

We performed carbohydrate analysis via a simple phenol-sulfuric acid assay to determine the total carbohydrate content on the particle. Total carbohydrate content was measured as glucose monomers, and was found to be 2 mmol glucose/AuNP (Figure S5).

Conjugation of Peptide/Glycopeptide Sequences to B13G-Coated AuNPs and Estimation of Peptide Coverage.

The attachment of the peptide antigens to our newly synthesized B13G AuNPs was performed by a simple place exchange reaction with our thiol-containing linked constructs. We were initially unsure if this would be successful considering the probable high coverage of the gold surface by the glycan polymer. However, coating with peptides or glycopeptides went smoothly as we were able to confirm the addition of these antigens by several indirect methods. As described above, for the unconjugated particle, we performed carbohydrate analysis post-conjugation to observe any displacement of the polymer. The results from this analysis suggested an approximate 50% drop in carbohydrate concentration after addition of the antigens, suggesting a displacement of polymer from the gold surface. This is expected as the polymer coating is through non-covalent interaction interactions in contrast to the stronger dative-type bond (~40 kcal/mol)79 formed between thiol and gold when antigen is conjugated.

Estimates of the peptide coverage was qualitatively made by the displacement of a fluorescent thiolated peptide that was conjugated to the B13G-coated particles. For this we used a commercially available 5kDa FITC-PEG thiol that we conjugated to the B13G AuNP. This in turn displaced a portion of the B13G from the particle, while the attachment caused the well-known fluorophore quenching by the Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) properties of 3-dimensional self-assembled monolayers of gold. Subsequent release of the PEG-fluorophore by treatment with dithiothreitol (DTT) restored fluorescence which was quantitated at 525 nm. This corresponded to a loading of 362 nM FITC-PEG per a solution of 400 μg/mL of nanoparticle (Figure S6).

Dectin-1 Binding.

The B13G AuNPs were compared with free B13G for binding to Dectin-1. As shown in Figure S7, ELISA assays where the polysaccharide was bound to the wells and binding was analyzed with Fc-Dectin-1 (InvivoGen, Ca), B13G-AuNPs bind equally well or better than soluble B13G in a dose dependent manner. Binding was observable down to single digit nanomolar concentrations. This result showed that the binding to the targeted C-type lectin was recapitulated in the designed B13G-stabilized particles.

Vaccination studies with B13G AuNPs: in vitro Model Study with OVA Peptides.

Before attempting any in vivo experiments, initial evaluation of the B13G AuNPs with a model system was performed as an in vitro pre-screen for appropriate biological activity. Our design took advantage of the availability of a macrophage/T-cell clone pair that can present and recognize a specific ovalbumin peptide, respectively. Tumor macrophage Dectin-1-expressing cell line P388D1 was paired with the Do-11.10 T-cell clone which expresses a T-cell receptor (TCR) that recognizes a specific 17-amino acid ovalbumin MHC class-II epitope. In brief, uptake and presentation of the OVA peptide by P388D1 cells within the context of MHC-II will allow recognition by the T-cell clone and release of IL-2. We synthesized this 17-residue peptide encompassing the recognition domain containing OVA amino acids 324–340 (i.e., in single amino acid code: ISQAVHAAHAEINEAGR) and coupled the N-terminus to our thiol-containing linker (OVA17) for conjugation to B13G-AuNPs (see Figure 3A for a description of the experiment). We also synthesized a second peptide containing a tetrapeptide cathepsin B protease recognition domain (-GFLG-) after the N-terminal isoleucine and directly before linker attachment (OVA 21). Cathepsins are known to facilitate The peptides were characterized by NMR and both ESI and MALDI mass spec (see Supporting Information for all characterization data). Each of these were coupled to B13G-AuNPs as described above. Figure 3 shows the IL-2 readout resulting from incubation of the OVA-conjugated B13G-AuNPs with both the P388D1 and Do-11.10 cells as described in Materials and Methods. As shown in Figure 3B, at 15 μg well, the B13G -OVA21-AuNP construct was as active as the peptide alone at 200 μg/well (positive control), while the construct without the cathepsin cleavage motif (B13G-OVA17-AuNP) was about half as active as the OVA21 construct. These results suggested that the particles function to enter Dectin-1 expressing APCs and retain the ability to present peptide (glycopeptide) cargo to T-cells.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

(A) Schematic scheme of the OVA model system. (B) Readout of IL-2 release from treatment of P338D1 macrophages with various controls and B13G-AuNPs, followed by incubation with OVA-specific T-cell clone Do-11.10.

in vivo Vaccination Studies with B13G-MUC4/Glycopeptide-Loaded AuNPs.

Based on the ovalbumin study, we prepared B13G-AuNPs with our MUC4 peptide/glycopeptides from Figure 1. These studies were performed in two stages: First, we prepared B13G-AuNPs conjugated with the unglycosylated MUC4 peptide (B13G-MUC4-AuNPs) and immunized with two distinct adjuvants to determine the most efficient combination for immune enhancement; Second, the TF-Ser(5) glycopeptide was conjugated to B13G-AuNPs (B13G-TF-Ser(5)-MUC4-AuNPs) utilizing the adjuvant chosen in the first vaccination. In this step the glycopeptide was also conjugated to the a highly immune-stimulating protein carrier CRM197 (B13G-TF-Ser(5)-MUC4-CRM197), a recombinant, non-toxic form of diptheria toxin used as a carrier protein for many polysaccharides8082, as a “positive” control. This was done to compare the new platform to one known to elicit very powerful immune responses to many different haptens. All synthetic haptens were prepared with the -GFLG- tetrapeptide cathepsin B cleavage site based on the superior performance of these constructs in the model study. See Figure 4 for a general description of the experimental protocol.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Protocol for in vivo immunizations. In stage 1 (pink box) animals were injected with either B13G-AuNPs or MUC4- B13G-AuNPs with either the Sigma Adjuvant System or TiterMax Gold as adjuvants (descriptions on lower right) with immunization schedule shown on the right, with serum collected at day 52. In stage 2 (light green box), the glycopeptide-coated particles, TF-MUC4-B13G-AuNPs were injected with SAS, or with CRM197- TF-MUC4 conjugate (no nanoparticles). Each stage contained a control group of mice injected with PBS.

Each stage consisted of three groups of five mice to be injected. Stage 1 groups were inoculated with B13G-AuNPs (negative control), B13G-MUC4-AuNPs (2 groups, vide infra) and PBS. Stage 2 groups were B13G-AuNPs (negative control), B13G-TF-Ser(5)-MUC4-AuNPs and PBS. The experimental design is summarized in Figure 4. Stage 1 used three sets of mice, one PBS control and one set for each for vaccination with B13G-MUC4-AuNPs combined with two separate adjuvants: 1) the Sigma Adjuvant System®, (SAS), which consists of monophosphoryl lipid A (a detoxified endotoxin) and synthetic trehalose dicorynomycolate in a 2% squalene oil base and 2) TiterMax® Gold (TMG) which is a mixture of a block copolymer (CRL-8300) and sorbitan monooleate, also in a squalene base. Interestingly, only immunization with SAS elicited both humoral (Figures 5AC) and cell-based immune responses. Both IgG and IgM titers against the MUC4 epitope were generated, with values as high as 180,000 for the IgG isotype. The IgG’s generated were primarily of the IgG1 and IgG2b subtypes. Control particles gave no response and the TMG vaccination only showed very low IgM titers of any immunoglobulin type.

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Graph of antibody titers to the MUC4 21-mer peptide from stage 1 immunizations. (A) IgG, (B) IgM and (C) IgG subtypes.

The SAS vaccine subgroup was analyzed by a cytokine bead assay. The repertoire of cytokines expressed can be used as a measure of a cell-mediated response and to stratify the T-helper subtypes that were generated. The SAS adjuvant subset showed stimulation of IL-1β, IL-5, IL-6, IFN- γ, IL-17, IL-21, IL-23 and MIP3α. Only IL-6 and IL-10 production was seen in the TMG subset from this pilot study, indicating a more immmunosuppressive environment in these mice (See Figures S8S11). Due to this undesirable outcome and the overall low levels of cytokines expressed in the TMG-adjuvanted mice, it was decided to use only SAS in the follow-up trial with the TF-Ser(5)-MUC4 glycopeptide and any other subsequent vaccinations trial with glycopeptide antigens.

The B13G-TF-Ser(5)-MUC4-AuNPs study proceeded identically to the MUC4 peptide study in terms of immunization frequency and amounts of nanoparticles injected. For this study, we used B13G-TF-Ser(5)-MUC4-AuNPs, “naked” B13G-AuNPs without glycopeptide conjugation and one group vaccinated with a TF-Ser(5)-MUC4-CRM197 conjugate (formed by coupling the thiolated antigen to CRM197-Maleimide, purchased from Fina Biosolutions, LLC; see Figure S12 for a MALDI mass spectrum of the conjugate). All the vaccinations were performed with the SAS adjuvant. The CRM197 conjugate generated a very intense immune response with antibody titers as high as 800,000 (Figure S13). Our B13G-TF-Ser(5)-MUC4-AuNPs also generated very respectable immunoglobulin responses, comparable to those seen with the unglycosylated peptide nanoparticles (IgG titers as high as 300,000). These results suggested that the platform we are using can generate high humoral immune responses without the need for highly immunogenic carrier protein (See Discussion).

The cell-mediated response from vaccinations with the B13G-TF-Ser(5)-MUC4-AuNPs was also comparable to the response seen from animals vaccinated with unglycosylated peptide-conjugated B13G-AuNPs. While the Th2 response was similar between glycopeptide or peptide-based vaccines, the IFN-γ quantities were about 2-fold higher in the glycopeptide-vaccinated animals. ELISpot analysis of splenocytes isolated from sacrificed animals (See Figure S14) showed proliferation of both peptide and glycopeptide-specific T-cell clones, all suggesting that antigen-conjugated B13G-AuNPs can be taken up by APCs and their cargo presented to T-cells (Figure 6). Important to both vaccination studies was the absence of Il-10 protein expression elicited by either of our vaccines. IL-10 is a cytokine that suppresses the ability of DCs to stimulate CD4+ T-cell proliferation and reduces IFN-γ production.83, 84 In addition, only the CRM197 conjugate sera contained TGF-β, another cytokine that can have both immunosuppressive and anti-apoptotic effects. Importantly, a trial of the pancreatic cancer vaccine GVAX showed potentiated antitumor activity when combined with TGF-β blockade.85

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

Graphs of ELISspot disk counts comparing vaccinations of our TF-Ser(5)-MUC4- B13G-AuNP conjugate the TF-Ser(5)-MUC4-CRM197 conjugate and control B13G-AuNPs when panned for interferon-γ and IL-17 production. While the TF-Ser(5)-MUC4-CRM197 conjugate has an intense humoral response, the TF-MUC4 vaccine construct elicited a much stronger CD4+ T-cell response, whereas the control B13G-AuNPs consistently showed no response.

DISCUSSION

In this study we have prepared a AuNP that combines an APC targeting moiety and a novel glycopeptide antigen. This antigen was chosen since we had previously shown that an antibody raised to this glycopeptide was tumor specific.45 The use of B13G polymers as both stabilizing and targeting agents has produced a nanoparticle that is adaptable and multifunctional. The microwave-assisted synthesis of the B13G-AuNPs allowed for reproducible production of size-controlled nanoparticles that have a long shelf life, and these constructions may also be functionalized with antigens of various molecular families. Although we did not perform any direct imaging or Dectin-1 knockout studies, both in vitro and in vivo data showed that these AuNPs can generate distinct and powerful immune responses, strongly suggesting that these particles can be endocytosed by APCs and presented to T-cells to produce mature antibodies and helper T-cells. The preliminary data shown here on the quality, magnitude and uniqueness of the immune response is very encouraging. First, the antibody response was quite respectable for a simple nanoparticle system and compares well with other TACA-based vaccine antibody titers that were generated from either the fully synthetic platforms of Boons, et al.86, 87, the Q-beta-based platforms of the Huang lab34 or the MUC4 glycopeptide Tetanus Toxoid conjugates of the Kunz group.88 The work from Kunz et al., is most relevant to the present work, as this is the only other group that has used MUC4 tandem repeat TACA-containing glycopeptide units in their work. They report titers of 50,000–400,000 for two vaccinations which is very comparable to that observed in the present study; in addition, IgG2 are the predominant isotype of the antibodies produced in the present study. Here we also report results on the cytokine profiles that were generated by presentation of antigen to T-cells by what we assume is an MHC-II-mediated process. Expression of of IL-1β, IL-5, IL-6, Interferon-γ, IL-17, IL-21, IL-23 and MIP3α. were observed in the cytokine array indicating a mixed Th1/Th2/Th17 profile (see Table 1). The expression levels of IL-21 are important because it is known to stimulate levels of NK/NKT and CD8+ cells that have proved essential in killing of certain tumors8991 as well as viral-infected cells.9294 The profiles were similar for both the peptide and glycopeptide vaccinations, and the antibody responses were highly specific for our MUC4 constructs, much as the mAb produced by standard KLH-conjugate in a prelude to the present study.45

Table 1.

Secreted cytokine amounts (in picograms) detected in sera of mice vaccinated with our MUC4 glycopeptide B13G gold nanoparticle or a conjugate of that same glycopeptide with CRM197.

Vaccination Epitope
B13G-TF-MUC4-AuNP/SAS TF-MUC4-CRM B13G-AuNP PBS
Cytokine Detected Amount (pg)
IL-1β 140.5 1440 23.7 28.8
IL-5 476.75 7567.5 56.3 30.2
IL-6 421.5 447 43 25
IL-17 107 1346 42 36.2
IL-21 103 63 18.5 12.5
IL-23 394 5811 79.8 35.3
INF-γ 724 7558 116.3 60.3
MIP-1α 560 5166 310 215
IL-10 0 9 33.5 20.75
TGF-β 0 >70,000 0 0

The data from the cytokine array suggests that the CRM-197 conjugates elicit the expression of high circulating levels of cytokines compared to the B13G-AuNP (Table 1). However, from ELISpot analysis, when CD4+ T-cells and DCs were stimulated with MUC4, there was an 8-fold increase in quantifiable spots for IFN-y and IL-17 for B13G conjugates compared to CRM-197. When stimulated with TF-Ser(5)-MUC4, there was a reduction in CD4+ activation in comparison to MUC4 stimulation, but the B13G conjugate demonstrated a 4-fold increase of cytokine stimulation. The decrease in CD4+ stimulation towards the glycopeptide can be attributed to possible reduced lysosomal processing of a modified (glycosylated) peptide or lower affinity for the CD4+ T-cell receptor to the antigen-MHCII complex due to “interference’ from the disaccharide. These data bode well for use of simple and widely available materials to construct a vaccine that will raise proper immune responses and whose formulation does not involve the use of detoxified82 proteins or large, multiepitope-containing carrier molecules19 that can redirect and dampen the immune response to a chosen immunogen.

The synthesis of the B13G-AuNPs is very simple and modular. It is important to note that this procedure only worked well under microwave conditions. This is possibly due to maintenance of solubility of the yeast B13G during the reduction or an acceleration of the rate of reaction to facilitate Au+3 to Au0 reduction and nanoparticle growth seeding.95 While it is well known that naked AuNPs as well as citrate stabilized particles are quite sensitive to aggregation/flocculation under various conditions, passivation with appropriate entities can stabilize AuNPs to a variety of conditions, allowing for use in relative “harsh” milieus (i.e., human serum).96, 97 The success of any AuNP therapy is contingent on this inherent or instilled stability, and our particles have fit this first and critical criterion. Many reports have shown that polysaccharides can act as reducing/coating agents in the synthesis of AuNPs.98 The use of gums such as gellan70, karaya68 and katira69 have been used in what are considered “green” syntheses of AuNPs where reactive reductants and additional stabilizers are unnecessary. There has been one report of the synthesis of both gold and silver nanoparticles using B13G as the reductant and passivating agent.65 In this study, curdlan, which is a linear (no 1,6 branching) B13G produced as an exopolysaccharide from certain Rhizobeaceae species99, was used as well as microwave catalysis; however, no biological data was reported and the quality and size of the particles differed from those presented here.

In addition, B13G themselves are known to form self-assembled nanoparticles and these have unique applications in the biomedical field.64, 100, 101 Some of these particulate forms of B13G have also been used to stabilize nanoparticles for macrophage targeting.64 In fact, there are many forms of B13G from various sources that have been used in research toward immunological enhancement for some time. B13G are found primarily in yeast and other fungal species as well as in oats, barley and other cereals and are made up of β−1,3 glucose linkages with various β−1,6 branching points (fungal), whereas the cereal glucans have both β−1,3 and β−1,4 linkages. Curdlan is a linear B13G found in bacteria that has been used in a variety of physical and biochemical studies. Laminarin is a seaweed-derived B13G made up of about a 3:1 ratio of 1,3 and 1,6 linkages.102 All of these variants have in some form been explored as immune stimulating entities. Targeting through B13G has been shown to enhance the vaccination efficacy of polysaccharide antigens in anti-bacterial vaccine design.49, 103 B13G can also assume a variety of structural forms depending on experimental conditions.7274, 76, 77, 104 Interestingly, B13G can adopt a triple helix conformation which is relevant to interaction of this polysaccharide and cellular receptors like Dectin-1.105 While not completely characterized in the present work, it can be assumed that the B13G on the AuNP surface adopt a conformation that allows proper interaction with Dectin-1 for signal transduction and endocytosis. The processing of the B13G before attaching to AuNPs involved dissolution in base and microwave heating to affect reduction and AuNP formation. While this protocol may unravel a tertiary structural element such as a triple helix, reconstitution of a bioactive conformation is assumed to be facilitated by the “bottom-up” synthesis of self-assembled 3-Dimensional gold nanospheres. Structural and conformational studies of the on-particle B13G molecules and the relationship these elements have on activity is currently in progress.

In conclusion, we have prepared a robust and simple platform that can target APCs with various families of antigens for antibody production and T-cell activation in a mouse. The simple conjugation and delivery of glycopeptide antigens is highly relevant, as the design of novel therapies based on TACA-containing tandem repeat sequences from tumor-associated mucins is still a very active area of tumor vaccine research; however, no viable products have yet advanced past the various stages of clinical evaluation. The use of a non-toxic, gold nanoparticle platform, combined with pathogen-associated molecular patters that recognize innate PRRs on APCs is an approach that potentially can solve many of the issues associated with vaccine constructs design to date. The ability to deliver relevant antigens through simple peptide and linker chemistry is also an advantage to the current method. The combination of chemoenzymatic TACA synthesis and simple conjugation techniques will allow for the delivery of many different glycopeptide-type antigens with the potential for true immunotherapy against specific cancers. Work toward defining the actual antitumor activity of our platforms against specific pancreatic tumor models is currently underway and will be presented in due course.

Supplementary Material

Supporting Information

Acknowledgements:

We thank James Kelley of the CBL for help with high resolution mass spectra and Kunio Nagashima and the Electron Microscopy Laboratory, Frederick National Laboratories for TEM images. This project has been funded in whole or in part with Federal funds from the National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, under Contract No. HHSN261200800001E. The content of this publication does not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Department of Health and Human Services, nor does mention of trade names, commercial products, or organizations imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.

Footnotes

Competing Interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional Information: Supporting Information accompanies this text.

References

  • 1.Hakomori SI, New Directions in Cancer-Therapy Based on Aberrant Expression of Glycosphingolipids - Antiadhesion and Ortho-Signaling Therapy. Cancer Cell-Mon Rev 1991, 3 (12), 461–470. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Feizi T; Childs RA, Carbohydrate Structures of Glycoproteins and Glycolipids as Differentiation Antigens, Tumor-Associated Antigens and Components of Receptor Systems. Trends Biochem Sci 1985, 10 (1), 24–29. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Dabelsteen E, Cell surface carbohydrates as prognostic markers in human carcinomas. J Pathol 1996, 179 (4), 358–369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Andreana PR, Zwitterionic polysaccharide (PS A1) as an immune elicitor for vaccine development. Abstr Pap Am Chem S 2009, 237, 748–748. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Jin KT; Lan HR; Chen XY; Wang SB; Ying XJ; Lin Y; Mou XZ, Recent advances in carbohydrate-based cancer vaccines. Biotechnol Lett 2019, 41 (6–7), 641–650. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Wei MM; Wang YS; Ye XS, Carbohydrate-based vaccines for oncotherapy. Med Res Rev 2018, 38 (3), 1003–1026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Feng DY; Shaikh AS; Wang FS, Recent Advance in Tumor-associated Carbohydrate Antigens (TACAs)-based Antitumor Vaccines. Acs Chemical Biology 2016, 11 (4), 850–863. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Amon R; Reuven EM; Ben-Arye SL; Padler-Karavani V, Glycans in immune recognition and response. Carbohyd Res 2014, 389, 115–122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Liu CC; Ye XS, Carbohydrate-based cancer vaccines: target cancer with sugar bullets. Glycoconjugate J 2012, 29 (5–6), 259–271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Yin ZJ; Huang XF, Recent Development in Carbohydrate Based Anticancer Vaccines. J Carbohyd Chem 2012, 31 (1–3), 143–186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Guo ZW; Wang QL, Recent development in carbohydrate-based cancer vaccines. Curr Opin Chem Biol 2009, 13 (5–6), 608–617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Franco A, Glycoconjugates as vaccines for cancer immunotherapy: Clinical trials and future directions. Anti-Cancer Agent Me 2008, 8 (1), 86–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Xu Y; Sette A; Sidney J; Gendler SJ; Franco A, Tumor-associated carbohydrate antigens: a possible avenue for cancer prevention. Immunol Cell Biol 2005, 83 (4), 440–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Toyokuni T; Singhal AK, Synthetic Carbohydrate Vaccines Based on Tumor-Associated Antigens. Chem Soc Rev 1995, 24 (4), 231–+. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Yang ZG; Ma YF; Zhao H; Yuan Y; Kim BYS, Nanotechnology platforms for cancer immunotherapy. Wires Nanomed Nanobi 2020, 12 (2). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Hu J; Wei P; Seeberger PH; Yin J, Mannose-Functionalized Nanoscaffolds for Targeted Delivery in Biomedical Applications. Chem-Asian J 2018, 13 (22), 3448–3459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Yin ZJ; Wu XJ; Kaczanowska K; Sungsuwan S; Aragones MC; Pett C; Yu J; Baniel C; Westerlind U; Finn MG; Huang XF, Antitumor Humoral and T Cell Responses by Mucin-1 Conjugates of Bacteriophage Q beta in Wild-type Mice. Acs Chemical Biology 2018, 13 (6), 1668–1676. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Yin ZJ; Comellas-Aragones M; Chowdhury S; Bentley P; Kaczanowska K; BenMohamed L; Gildersleeve JC; Finn MG; Huang XF, Boosting Immunity to Small Tumor-Associated Carbohydrates with Bacteriophage Q beta Capsids. Acs Chemical Biology 2013, 8 (6), 1253–1262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Buskas T; Thompson P; Boons GJ, Immunotherapy for cancer: synthetic carbohydrate-based vaccines. Chem Commun 2009, (36), 5335–5349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Thompson P; Lakshminarayanan V; Supekar NT; Bradley JM; Cohen PA; Wolfert MA; Gendler SJ; Boons GJ, Linear synthesis and immunological properties of a fully synthetic vaccine candidate containing a sialylated MUC1 glycopeptide. Chem Commun 2015, 51 (50), 10214–10217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Tagliamonte M; Petrizzo A; Tornesello ML; Buonaguro FM; Buonaguro L, Antigen-specific vaccines for cancer treatment. Hum Vacc Immunother 2014, 10 (11), 3332–3346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Pietersz GA; Pouniotis DS; Apostolopoulos V, Design of Peptide-Based Vaccines for Cancer. Front Med Chem 2010, 5, 127–166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Pietersz GA; Pouniotis DS; Apostolopoulos V, Design of peptide-based vaccines for cancer. Curr Med Chem 2006, 13 (14), 1591–1607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ingale S; Wolfert MA; Buskas T; Boons GJ, Increasing the Antigenicity of Synthetic Tumor-Associated Carbohydrate Antigens by Targeting Toll-Like Receptors. Chembiochem 2009, 10 (3), 455–463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Zhou ZF; Lin H; Li C; Wu ZM, Recent progress of fully synthetic carbohydrate-based vaccine using TLR agonist as build-in adjuvant. Chinese Chem Lett 2018, 29 (1), 19–26. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Nishat S; Andreana PR, Entirely Carbohydrate-Based Vaccines: An Emerging Field for Specific and Selective Immune Responses. Vaccines-Basel 2016, 4 (2). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Krishnamachari Y; Geary SM; Lemke CD; Salem AK, Nanoparticle Delivery Systems in Cancer Vaccines. Pharm Res-Dordr 2011, 28 (2), 215–236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Zhang Y; Lin SB; Wang XY; Zhu GZ, Nanovaccines for cancer immunotherapy. Wires Nanomed Nanobi 2019, 11 (5). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Sun ZY; Chen PG; Liu YF; Zhang BD; Wu JJ; Chen YX; Zhao YF; Li YM, Multi-component self-assembled anti-tumor nano-vaccines based on MUC1 glycopeptides. Chem Commun 2016, 52 (48), 7572–7575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Teran-Navarro H; Calderon-Gonzalez R; Salcines-Cuevas D; Garcia I; Marradi M; Freire J; Salmon E; Portillo-Gonzalez M; Frande-Cabanes E; Garcia-Castano A; Martinez-Callejo V; Gomez-Roman J; Tobes R; Rivera F; Yanez-Diaz S; Alvarez-Dominguez C, Pre-clinical development of Listeria-based nanovaccines as immunotherapies for solid tumours: insights from melanoma. Oncoimmunology 2019, 8 (2). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Calderon-Gonzalez R; Teran-Navarro H; Garcia I; Marradi M; Salcines-Cuevas D; Yanez-Diaz S; Solis-Angulo A; Frande-Cabanes E; Farinas MC; Garcia-Castano A; Gomez-Roman J; Penades S; Rivera F; Freire J; Alvarez-Dominguez C, Gold glyconanoparticles coupled to listeriolysin O 91–99 peptide serve as adjuvant therapy against melanoma. Nanoscale 2017, 9 (30), 10721–10732. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Parry AL; Clemson NA; Ellis J; Bernhard SSR; Davis BG; Cameron NR, ‘Multicopy Multivalent’ Glycopolymer-Stabilized Gold Nanoparticles as Potential Synthetic Cancer Vaccines. J Am Chem Soc 2013, 135 (25), 9362–9365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Salahuddin N; Elbarbary AA; Salem ML; Elksass S, Antimicrobial and antitumor activities of 1,2,4-triazoles/polypyrrole chitosan core shell nanoparticles. J Phys Org Chem 2017, 30 (12). [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Sungsuwan S; Wu XJ; Huang XF, Evaluation of Virus-Like ParticleBased Tumor-Associated Carbohydrate Immunogen in a Mouse Tumor Model. Method Enzymol 2017, 597, 359–376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Yin ZJ; Dulaney S; Mckay CS; Baniel C; Kaczanowska K; Ramadan S; Finn MG; Huang XF, Chemical Synthesis of GM2 Glycans, Bioconjugation with Bacteriophage Q beta, and the Induction of Anticancer Antibodies. Chembiochem 2016, 17 (2), 174–180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Gibadullin R; Farnsworth DW; Barchi JJ; Gildersleeve JC, GaINAc-Tyrosine Is a Ligand of Plant Lectins, Antibodies, and Human and Murine Macrophage Galactose-Type Lectins. Acs Chemical Biology 2017, 12 (8), 2172–2182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Brinas RP; Sundgren A; Sahoo P; Morey S; Rittenhouse-Olson K; Wilding GE; Deng W; Barchi JJ Jr., Design and synthesis of multifunctional gold nanoparticles bearing tumor-associated glycopeptide antigens as potential cancer vaccines. Bioconjug Chem 2012, 23 (8), 1513–23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Svarovsky SA; Szekely Z; Barchi JJ, Synthesis of gold nanoparticles bearing the Thomsen-Friedenreich disaccharide: a new multivalent presentation of an important tumor antigen. Tetrahedron-Asymmetr 2005, 16 (2), 587–598. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Biswas S; Medina SH; Barchi JJ, Synthesis and cell-selective antitumor properties of amino acid conjugated tumor-associated carbohydrate antigen-coated gold nanoparticles. Carbohyd Res 2015, 405, 93–101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Glinskii OV; Li F; Wilson LS; Barnes S; Rittenhouse-Olson K; Barchi JJ; Pienta KJ; Glinsky VV, Endothelial integrin alpha 3 beta 1 stabilizes carbohydrate-mediated tumor/endothelial cell adhesion and induces macromolecular signaling complex formation at the endothelial cell membrane. Oncotarget 2014, 5 (5), 1382–1389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Sundgren A; Barchi JJ, Varied presentation of the Thomsen-Friedenreich disaccharide tumor-associated carbohydrate antigen on gold nanoparticles. Carbohyd Res 2008, 343 (10–11), 1594–1604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Gautam SK; Kumar S; Cannon A; Hall B; Bhatia R; Nasser MW; Mahapatra S; Batra SK; Jain M, MUC4 mucin- a therapeutic target for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Expert Opin Ther Targets 2017, 21 (7), 657–669. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Kurtenkov O; Innos K; Sergejev B; Klaamas K, The Thomsen-Friedenreich Antigen-Specific Antibody Signatures in Patients with Breast Cancer. Biomed Res Int 2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Almogren A; Abdullah J; Ghapure K; Ferguson K; Glinsky VV; Rittenhouse-Olson K, Anti-Thomsen-Friedenreich-Ag (anti-TF-Ag) potential for cancer therapy. Frontiers in Bioscience - Scholar 2012, 4 S (3), 840–863. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Trabbic KR; Whalen K; Abarca-Heideman K; Xia L; Temme JS; Edmondson EF; Gildersleeve JC; Barchi JJ, A Tumor-Selective Monoclonal Antibody from Immunization with a Tumor-Associated Mucin Glycopeptide. Sci Rep-Uk 2019, 9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Janeway CA; Medzhitov R, Innate immune recognition. Annu Rev Immunol 2002, 20, 197–216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Bauer S; Muller T; Hamm S, Pattern Recognition by Toll-Like Receptors. Adv Exp Med Biol 2009, 653, 15–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Kaisho T; Akira S, Toll-like receptor function and signaling. J Allergy Clin Immun 2006, 117 (5), 979–987. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Mayer S; Raulf MK; Lepenies B, C-type lectins: their network and roles in pathogen recognition and immunity. Histochem Cell Biol 2017, 147 (2), 223–237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Penades S; de la Fuente JM; Barrientos AG; Clavel C; Martinez-Avila O; Alcantara D, Multifunctional glyconanoparticles: Applications in biology and biomedicine. Nato Sci Peace Sec B 2008, 93–101. [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Gauthier L; Chevallet M; Bulteau F; Thepaut M; Delangle P; Fieschi F; Vives C; Texier I; Deniaud A; Gateau C, Lectin recognition and hepatocyte endocytosis of GalNAc-decorated nanostructured lipid carriers. J Drug Target 2021, 29 (1), 99–107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Kleski KA; Trabbic KR; Shi MC; Bourgault JP; Andreana PR, Enhanced Immune Response Against the Thomsen-Friedenreich Tumor Antigen Using a Bivalent Entirely Carbohydrate Conjugate. Molecules 2020, 25 (6). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Napoletano C; Zizzari IG; Rughetti A; Rahimi H; Irimura T; Clausen H; Wandall HH; Belleudi F; Bellati F; Pierelli L; Frati L; Nuti M, Targeting of macrophage galactose-type C-type lectin (MGL) induces DC signaling and activation. Eur J Immunol 2012, 42 (4), 936–945. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Nuti M; Zizzari I; Napoletano C; Rughetti A; Rahimi H; Antonilli M; Bellati F; Di Costanzo F; Irimura T; Wandall H; Clausen H; Panici PB, Macrophage galactose-type C-type lectin receptor for DC targeting of antitumor glycopeptide vaccines. J Clin Oncol 2011, 29 (15). [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Bundle DR; Paszkiewicz E; Elsaidi HRH; Mandal SS; Sarkar S, A Three Component Synthetic Vaccine Containing a beta-Mannan T-Cell Peptide Epitope and a beta-Glucan Dendritic Cell Ligand. Molecules 2018, 23 (8). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Decout A; Silva-Gomes S; Drocourt D; Blattes E; Riviere M; Prandi J; Larrouy-Maumus G; Caminade AM; Hamasur B; Kallenius G; Kaur D; Dobos KM; Lucas M; Sutcliffe IC; Besra GS; Appelmelk BJ; Gilleron M; Jackson M; Vercellone A; Tiraby G; Nigou J, Deciphering the molecular basis of mycobacteria and lipoglycan recognition by the C-type lectin Dectin-2. Sci Rep-Uk 2018, 8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Xie JH; Guo L; Ruan YY; Zhu HY; Wang L; Zhou L; Yun XJ; Gu JX, Laminarin-mediated targeting to Dectin-1 enhances antigen-specific immune responses. Biochem Bioph Res Co 2010, 391 (1), 958–962. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Backer R; van Leeuwen F; Kraal G; den Haan JMM, CD8(−) dendritic cells preferentially cross-present Saccharomyces cerevisiae antigens. Eur J Immunol 2008, 38 (2), 370–380. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Castro ED; Calder PC; Roche HM, beta-1,3/1,6-Glucans and Immunity: State of the Art and Future Directions. Mol Nutr Food Res 2021, 65 (1). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Nasrollahzadeh M; Shafiei N; Nezafat Z; Bidgoli NSS; Soleimani F, Recent progresses in the application of cellulose, starch, alginate, gum, pectin, chitin and chitosan based (nano)catalysts in sustainable and selective oxidation reactions: A review. Carbohyd Polym 2020, 241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Devi L; Gupta R; Jain SK; Singh S; Kesharwani P, Synthesis, characterization and in vitro assessment of colloidal gold nanoparticles of Gemcitabine with natural polysaccharides for treatment of breast cancer. J Drug Deliv Sci Tec 2020, 56. [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Padil VVT; Waclawek S; Cernik M; Varma RS, Tree gum-based renewable materials: Sustainable applications in nanotechnology, biomedical and environmental fields. Biotechnol Adv 2018, 36 (7), 1984–2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Devendiran RM; Chinnaiyan SK; Yadav NK; Moorthy GK; Ramanathan G; Singaravelu S; Sivagnanam UT; Perumal PT, Green synthesis of folic acid-conjugated gold nanoparticles with pectin as reducing/stabilizing agent for cancer theranostics. Rsc Adv 2016, 6 (35), 29757–29768. [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Soto E; Ostroff G, Glucan Particles as Carriers of Nanoparticles for Macrophage-Targeted Delivery. Nanomaterials for Biomedicine 2012, 1119, 57–79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.El-Naggar ME; Shaheen TI; Fouda MMG; Hebeish AA, Eco-friendly microwave-assisted green and rapid synthesis of well-stabilized gold and core-shell silver-gold nanoparticles. Carbohyd Polym 2016, 136, 1128–1136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Palma AS; Feizi T; Zhang YB; Stoll MS; Lawson AM; Diaz-Rodriguez E; Campanero-Rhodes MA; Costa J; Gordon S; Brown GD; Chai WG, Ligands for the beta-glucan receptor, Dectin-1, assigned using “designer” microarrays of oligosaccharide probes (neoglycolipids) generated from glucan polysaccharides. J Biol Chem 2006, 281 (9), 5771–5779. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Sze DMY; Chan GCF, Effects of Beta-Glucans on Different Immune Cell Populations and Cancers. Adv Bot Res 2012, 62, 179–196. [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Gangapuram BR; Bandi R; Dadigala R; Kotu GM; Guttena V, Facile Green Synthesis of Gold Nanoparticles with Carboxymethyl Gum Karaya, Selective and Sensitive Colorimetric Detection of Copper (II) Ions. J Clust Sci 2017, 28 (5), 2873–2890. [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Maity S; Sen IK; Islam SS, Green synthesis of gold nanoparticles using gum polysaccharide of Cochlospermum religiosum (katira gum) and study of catalytic activity. Physica E 2012, 45, 130–134. [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Dhar S; Mali V; Bodhankar S; Shiras A; Prasad BLV; Pokharkar V, Biocompatible gellan gum-reduced gold nanoparticles: cellular uptake and subacute oral toxicity studies. J Appl Toxicol 2011, 31 (5), 411–420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Zhang YL; Muthana SM; Farnsworth D; Ludek O; Adams K; Barchi JJ; Gildersleeve JC, Enhanced Epimerization of Glycosylated Amino Acids During Solid-Phase Peptide Synthesis. J Am Chem Soc 2012, 134 (14), 6316–6325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Sletmoen M; Stokke BT, Review : Higher order structure of (1,3)-beta-D-glucans and its influence on their biological activities and complexation abilities. Biopolymers 2008, 89 (4), 310–321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Okobira T; Miyoshi K; Uezu K; Sakurai K; Shinkai S, Molecular dynamics studies of side chain effect on the beta-1,3-D-glucan triple helix in aqueous solution. Biomacromolecules 2008, 9 (3), 783–788. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Yadomae T, Structure and biological activities of fungal beta-1,3-glucans. Yakugaku Zasshi 2000, 120 (5), 413–431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.McIntire TM; Brant DA, Observations of the (1 -> 3)-beta-D-glucan linear triple helix to macrocycle interconversion using noncontact atomic force microscopy. J Am Chem Soc 1998, 120 (28), 6909–6919. [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Bohn JA; BeMiller JN, (1->3)-beta-D-glucans as biological response modifiers: A review of structure-functional activity relationships. Carbohyd Polym 1995, 28 (1), 3–14. [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Saito H; Tabeta R; Yoshioka Y; Hara C; Kiho T; Ukai S, A High-Resolution Solid-State C-13 Nmr-Study of the Secondary Structure of Branched (1-]3)-Beta-D-Glucans from Fungi - Evidence of 2 Kinds of Conformers, Curdlan-Type Single-Helix and Laminaran-Type Triple-Helix Forms, as Manifested from the Conformation-Dependent C-13 Chemical-Shifts. B Chem Soc Jpn 1987, 60 (12), 4267–4272. [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Pooja D; Panyaram S; Kulhari H; Reddy B; Rachamalla SS; Sistla R, Natural polysaccharide functionalized gold nanoparticles as biocompatible drug delivery carrier. Int J Biol Macromol 2015, 80, 48–56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Burgi T, Properties of the gold-sulphur interface: from self-assembled monolayers to clusters. Nanoscale 2015, 7 (38), 15553–15567. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.MacCalman TE; Phillips-Jones MK; Harding SE, Glycoconjugate vaccines: some observations on carrier and production methods. Biotechnol Genet Eng Rev 2019, 35 (2), 93–125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Dagan R; Poolman J; Siegrist CA, Glycoconjugate vaccines and immune interference: A review. Vaccine 2010, 28 (34), 5513–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Hsieh CL, Characterization of saccharide-CRM197 conjugate vaccines. Dev Biol (Basel) 2000, 103, 93–104. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Mittal SK; Cho KJ; Ishido S; Roche PA, Interleukin 10 (IL-10)-mediated Immunosuppression: MARCH-I INDUCTION REGULATES ANTIGEN PRESENTATION BY MACROPHAGES BUT NOT DENDRITIC CELLS. J Biol Chem 2015, 290 (45), 27158–27167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Mittal SK; Roche PA, Suppression of antigen presentation by IL-10. Curr Opin Immunol 2015, 34, 22–27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Soares KC; Rucki AA; Kim V; Foley K; Solt S; Wolfgang CL; Jaffee EM; Zheng L, TGF-beta blockade depletes T regulatory cells from metastatic pancreatic tumors in a vaccine dependent manner. Oncotarget 2015, 6 (40), 43005–43015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Ingale S; AWolfert M; Gaekwad J; Buskas T; Boons GJ, Robust immune responses elicited by a fully synthetic three-component vaccine. Nat Chem Biol 2007, 3 (10), 663–667. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Buskas T; Ingale S; Boons GJ, Towards a fully synthetic carbohydrate-based anticancer vaccine: Synthesis and immunological evaluation of a lipidated glycopeptide containing the tumor-associated Tn antigen. Angew Chem Int Edit 2005, 44 (37), 5985–5988. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Cai H; Palitzsch B; Hartmann S; Stergiou N; Kunz H; Schmitt E; Westerlind U, Antibody induction directed against the tumor-associated MUC4 glycoprotein. Chembiochem 2015, 16 (6), 959–67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Davis MR; Zhu ZW; Hansen DM; Bai Q; Fang YJ, The role of IL-21 in immunity and cancer. Cancer Lett 2015, 358 (2), 107–114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Thedrez A; Harly C; Morice A; Salot S; Bonneville M; Scotet E, IL-21-Mediated Potentiation of Antitumor Cytolytic and Proinflammatory Responses of Human V gamma 9V delta 2 T Cells for Adoptive Immunotherapy. J Immunol 2009, 182 (6), 3423–3431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Davis ID; Skak K; Hunder N; Smyth MJ; Sivakumar PV, Interleukin-21 and Cancer Therapy. Targeted Cancer Immune Therapy 2009, 43–59. [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Mendez-Lagares G; Lu D; Merriam D; Baker CA; Villinger F; Van Rompay KKA; McCune JM; Hartigan-O’Connor DJ, IL-21 Therapy Controls Immune Activation and Maintains Antiviral CD8(+) T Cell Responses in Acute Simian Immunodeficiency Virus Infection. Aids Res Hum Retrov 2017, 33, S81–S92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Pallikkuth S; Parmigiani A; Pahwa S, The role of interleukin-21 in HIV infection. Cytokine Growth F R 2012, 23 (4–5), 173–180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Sarra M; Pallone F; Macdonald TT; Monteleone G, Targeting Interleukin-21 in Immune-Mediated Pathologies. Curr Drug Targets 2010, 11 (5), 645–649. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Li-Ping Y; Wei-Xia T, Studies on Au colloidal nanoparticles synthesized by microwave irradiation. Acta Phys-Chim Sin 2006, 22 (4), 513–516. [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Mukhopadhyay A; Grabinski C; Afrooz ARMN; Saleh NB; Hussain S, Effect of Gold Nanosphere Surface Chemistry on Protein Adsorption and Cell Uptake In Vitro. Appl Biochem Biotech 2012, 167 (2), 327–337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Daniel MC; Astruc D, Gold nanoparticles: Assembly, supramolecular chemistry, quantum-size-related properties, and applications toward biology, catalysis, and nanotechnology. Chem Rev 2004, 104 (1), 293–346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Escarcega-Gonzalez CE; Garza-Cervantes JA; Vazquez-Rodriguez A; Morones-Ramirez JR, Bacterial Exopolysaccharides as Reducing and/or Stabilizing Agents during Synthesis of Metal Nanoparticles with Biomedical Applications. Int J Polym Sci 2018, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Cai ZX; Zhang HB, Recent progress on curdlan provided by functionalization strategies. Food Hydrocolloid 2017, 68, 128–135. [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Liu QY; Duan BC; Xu XJ; Zhang LN, Progress in rigid polysaccharide-based nanocomposites with therapeutic functions. J Mater Chem B 2017, 5 (29), 5690–5713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Sakurai K; Uezu K; Numata M; Hasegawa T; Li C; Kaneko K; Shinkai S, beta-1,3-glucan polysaccharides as novel one-dimensional hosts for DNA/RNA, conjugated polymers and nanoparticles. Chem Commun 2005, (35), 4383–4398. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Okazaki M; Adachi Y; Ohno N; Yadomae T, Structure-Activity Relationship of (1-]3)-Beta-D-Glucans in the Induction of Cytokine Production from Macrophages, in-Vitro. Biol Pharm Bull 1995, 18 (10), 1320–1327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Qiao WL; Ji SY; Zhao YB; Hu T, Conjugation of beta-glucan markedly increase the immunogencity of meningococcal group Y polysaccharide conjugate vaccine. Vaccine 2015, 33 (17), 2066–2072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Yoshioka Y; Uehara N; Saito H, Conformation-Dependent Change in Antitumor-Activity of Linear and Branched (1-]3)-Beta-D-Glucans on the Basis of Conformational Elucidation by C-13 Nuclear-Magnetic-Resonance Spectroscopy. Chem Pharm Bull 1992, 40 (5), 1221–1226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Hanashima S; Ikeda A; Tanaka H; Adachi Y; Ohno N; Takahashi T; Yamaguchi Y, NMR study of short beta(1–3)-glucans provides insights into the structure and interaction with Dectin-1. Glycoconjugate J 2014, 31 (3), 199–207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supporting Information

RESOURCES