Abstract
Capping of viral messenger RNAs is essential for efficient translation, for virus replication, and for preventing detection by the host cell innate response system. The SARS-CoV-2 genome encodes the 2′-O-methyltransferase nsp16, which, when bound to the coactivator nsp10, uses S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) as a donor to transfer a methyl group to the first ribonucleotide of the mRNA in the final step of viral mRNA capping. Here, we provide biochemical and structural evidence that this reaction requires divalent cations, preferably Mn2+, and a coronavirus-specific four-residue insert. We determined the X-ray structures of the SARS-CoV-2 2′-O-methyltransferase (the nsp16-nsp10 heterodimer) in complex with its reaction substrates, products, and divalent metal cations. These structural snapshots revealed that metal ions and the insert stabilize interactions between the capped RNA and nsp16, resulting in the precise alignment of the ribonucleotides in the active site. Comparison of available structures of 2′-O-methyltransferases with capped RNAs from different organisms revealed that the four-residue insert unique to coronavirus nsp16 alters the backbone conformation of the capped RNA in the binding groove, thereby promoting catalysis. This insert is highly conserved across coronaviruses, and its absence in mammalian methyltransferases makes this region a promising site for structure-guided drug design of selective coronavirus inhibitors.
INTRODUCTION
The recently emerged human pathogen SARS-CoV-2 is a positive-stranded RNA virus responsible for the on-going pandemic of highly transmissible fatal respiratory coronavirus infectious disease (COVID-19), which has caused over three million deaths worldwide (1). Like other coronaviruses, SARS-CoV-2 carries a large RNA genome of ~30 kilobases (2), which is directly translated into two polypeptides, Orf1a and Orf1ab. The polyproteins are subsequently autoprocessed into the non-structural proteins (nsps) that comprise the replication and transcription complex (RTC). The genome also serves as a template for viral RNA transcription to generate nine canonical subgenomic mRNAs that encode the SARS-CoV-2 structural and accessory proteins (3). These mRNAs are generated by the RTC through a discontinuous transcription process and thus have identical 5′-ends with an adenosine ribonucleotide at the first position (A1) (4, 5). These mRNAs are further modified by 5′-capping to stabilize, improve translation, and protect the RNA from surveillance by the host innate immune system (6, 7).
Coronavirus genome replication and transcription processes are confined to viral-specific organelles formed from endoplasmic reticulum membranes (8, 9) during early stages infection, and probably mitochondrial, endosomal, and Golgi membranes during viral particle assembly (8–10). Thus, nascent coronavirus mRNAs do not have access to the host mRNA capping and methylation machinery in the nucleus and instead encode their own capping machinery. The viral replication helicase nsp13 also has 5′-RNA triphosphatase activity that removes the 5′-γ-phosphate from the nascent ppp-RNA (11). The RNA-dependent RNA-polymerase nsp12 can then transfer a guanosine monophosphate to the 5′-end of the mRNA (12, 13), and this guanosine is then methylated by the nsp14-nsp10 heterodimer to generate N7-methylated Cap-0-RNA (m7GpppA1-RNA). Finally, to form the Cap-1-RNA, a methyl group is transferred from S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) to the 2′-OH of the first adenosine ribonucleotide. For coronaviruses, this last reaction is catalyzed by the 2′-O-methyltransferase (MTase), a heterodimeric complex of nsp16 with the activator nsp10 (Fig. 1A) (11, 14, 15). The coronavirus 2′-O-MTase is a validated antiviral drug target, because the formation of the nsp16-nsp10 complex can be blocked by peptides and protect mice from lethal challenge with mouse hepatitis virus (MHV) (16, 17).
Biochemical studies of the RNA MTases from SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV demonstrated that methyl transfer is activated by divalent cations. SARS-CoV nsp14 is activated by Mn2+, but not by Mg2+ (11), whereas nsp16 can be activated by Mn2+ or Mg2+ and to a lesser extent by Ca2+ (11, 18–20). These data are consistent with known requirements for divalent cations by other viral RNA MTases, including dengue virus (DENV) NS5, which is stimulated by Mg2+ (21). Furthermore, studies of nsp16 from SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV have demonstrated that the methyl transfer reaction is most efficient in vitro with an RNA substrate comprised of at least five ribonucleotides (11, 19, 20, 22). However, the role of metals in nsp16 catalysis and the influence of mRNA length on the reaction is not clear, particularly because no structures have been solved for any coronavirus nsp16 enzyme with bound metals or RNA. To support drug discovery efforts targeting nsp16, researchers around the globe have determined crystal structures of SARS-CoV-2 nsp16-nsp10 in complex with variety of ligands (23–29), complementing prior structural biology observations for this enzyme from SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV (19, 20, 30). This information has facilitated detailed examination of the SARS-CoV-2 2′-O-MTase and revealed conformational flexibility of loop 1 and loop8-η3-loop9, loops that border the Cap-0 binding site (25, 26). Despite this extensive structural information, a major gap exists in understanding of the role of metal ions in the nsp16 2′-O-methyl transfer reaction and the position of ribonucleotides in the RNA binding groove because structures of the enzyme in complex with RNA and metals have not been reported. Herein, we present structures of the SARS-CoV-2 2′-O-MTase nsp16-nsp10 heterodimer in complex with substrates and products in the presence of divalent cations. Our structures reveal important information regarding interactions of nsp16 residues with the capped RNA, the influence of a coronavirus MTase-specific four-residue insert on the conformation of capped RNA, and the role of metal ions in 2′-O-methyl transfer.
RESULTS
SARS-CoV-2 nsp16 activity requires extended capped RNA and divalent cations.
We launched this research by confirming that the SARS-CoV-2 2′-O-MTase activity requires divalent cations. We used a custom-synthesized Cap-0-RNA substrate comprised of the N7-methylated guanosine (m7G) attached through a triphosphate bridge to a short RNA (AUUAAA), which matches the naturally occurring ribonucleotides at the 5′-end of SARS-CoV-2 mRNAs (31). At a concentration of 2 mM, both Mg2+ and Mn2+ increased MTase activity on this substrate (Fig. 1B). In contrast, 2 mM Ca2+ yielded only 50% of the activity observed with Mg2+ and Na+ did not stimulate activity at 3 mM (Fig. 1B). These data are consistent with observations for SARS-CoV nsp16 (11, 19, 20). The activity of SARS-CoV-2 nsp16 with the Cap-0-RNA substrate (m7GpppAUUAAA) was over 10-times higher than that with the Cap-0 analog (m7GpppA) (Fig. 1B).
Isothermal calorimetry (ITC) measurements showed that, although it is a poor substrate for catalysis, m7GpppA does bind to nsp16-nsp10 (Kd = 6.6 ± 0.3 μM) with 3-fold higher affinity than to nsp16 alone (Kd = 28.0 ± 5.5μM) (fig. S1, C and E; table S1). In contrast, m7GpppG bound only to the nsp16-nsp10 heterodimer but not to nsp16 alone (Kd = 20.0 ± 2.7 μM) (fig. S1 D; table S1). We also determined the binding affinities for the methyl donor SAM and the product S-adenosylhomocysteine (SAH) for nsp16 and the nsp16-nsp10 heterodimer (fig. S1, A and B; table S1). Neither SAM nor SAH bound to nsp16 alone, but both SAM and SAH bound to the nsp16-nsp10 heterodimer with Kd values of 6.9 ± 1.3 μM and 13.0 ± 1.2 μM, respectively. These biochemical and ITC studies together, as well as work by others (11, 24, 26, 32), indicate that the Cap-0 analog is capable of binding to nsp16 alone and that nsp10 greatly enhances the binding affinity. However, a capped short RNA and the presence of Mg2+ or Mn2+ stimulates the rates of catalysis.
Crystal structures of the nsp16-nsp10 heterodimer with capped RNA and metal ions.
To gain insight into how metal ions stimulate catalysis, we took a structural biology approach. Crystals of nsp16-nsp10 in complex with SAM from different crystallization conditions were soaked with the custom-synthesized m7GpppAUUAAA substrate in the presence of Mg2+ or Mn2+. Multiple datasets were collected and, ultimately the three with the highest resolution and the best data statistics were selected for further analysis (table S2). Crystal #1 (PDB 7JYY) was soaked with substrates in the presence of 5 mM MgCl2 for 1.5 hours. In this crystal we observed Cap-0-RNA, SAM, and Mg2+ (Fig. 1C, D). Crystal #2 (PDB 7L6R) was soaked with substrates in the presence of 20 mM MnCl2 for 6 hours. In this crystal we observed Mn2+ and products of the reaction, Cap-1-RNA and SAH, indicating that the methyl transfer occurred in the crystal (Fig. 1E). Crystal #3 (PDB 7L6T) was soaked with substrates in the presence of 500 mM MgCl2 for 6 hours. In this crystal we observed two Mg2+ ions and the products Cap-1-RNA and SAH. The first Mg2+ occupied the same metal binding site as in Crystals #1 and #2, and the second Mg2+ directly interacted with phosphate groups of the capped RNA (fig. S2). The number of ribonucleotides in Crystal #1 and #3 included the m7G cap, first three ribonucleotides, and the phosphate group of A4. Crystal #2 contained the m7G cap, the first four ribonucleotides, and the phosphate group of A5.
Substrates are properly aligned when the capped short RNA is present.
An overlay of the previously reported structures of SARS-CoV-2 nsp16-nsp10 with bound Cap-0 analog (PDB 6WRZ (25)) and nsp16-nsp10 with Cap-0-RNA (PDB 7JYY, this study) revealed that they are very similar with a root-mean-square-deviation of 0.33 Å (Fig. 2A). We previously showed that the cap binding site, also called the high-affinity binding site (HBS), is bordered by flexible loops that adopt an open conformation upon Cap-0 analog binding (25). Interactions of the nsp16 residues with the Cap-0 analog and Cap-0-RNA are similar in both structures. The m7GpppA in the HBS is stabilized by stacking of the m7G and A1 bases with Tyr6828 and Tyr6930 residues, respectively (Fig. 2A). The O2′ of the A1 ribose interacts with the conserved nsp16 catalytic residues (19, 20) as well as with a conserved water molecule we previously identified (25). The interactions between Asn6841, SAM, and O2′ from the A1 are also consistent between these structures (Fig. 2B).
Of particular note was the space between the Tyr6930 and Asp6873 side chains, which is occupied by the A1 base in the Cap-0 analog structure. In the Cap-0-RNA structure, this space accommodates the stacked bases of A1 and U2, with the U2 base forcing repositioning of the A1 ribonucleotide (Fig. 2A). Superposition of the Cap-0 and Cap-0-RNA structures revealed that this repositioning involves both a 0.6 Å shift of the A1 base towards the side chain of Tyr6930 without notable changes in the positions of Asn6873 and Tyr6930, as well as a 0.4 Å decrease in the distance between O2′ of A1 and the SAM methyl group, which occurs without apparent changes in the position of catalytic residues (Fig. 2B). The movement and alignment of the A1 O2′ atom toward the methyl group of SAM may explain why the additional ribonucleotides increase the efficiency of the methyl transfer reaction (33–35).
Although the superposition of Cap-0 and capped RNA structures revealed differences in the position of the first adenosine, no deviations were observed between Cap-0-RNA and Cap-1-RNA conformations (Fig. 2 A,B), indicating that the A1 base is not repositioned after the methyl transfer. The structures are essentially identical with the only difference being the methyl group, which moves from SAM to the A1 ribose hydroxyl group during methyl transfer (Fig. 2 C,D).
Interaction of capped RNA ribonucleotides with residues of the low-affinity binding site
The structures in complex with capped RNAs also revealed the importance of the low-affinity binding site (LBS) residues for the conformation of the mRNA in the catalytic site. The best resolved and most complete electron density for capped RNA was observed in Crystal #2. The position of U2 in the active site is “locked” by multiple interactions (Fig. 3A). The phosphate group of U2 interacts with water molecules from the hydration sphere of the metal ion and the side chain nitrogen of Lys6844; the O2 atom of the U2 base interacts with the main chain nitrogen of Asp6873, and the O2′ of the U2 ribose makes direct interactions with one of the oxygens of the side chain of Asp6873 (Fig. 3B). The phosphate group of U3 interacts directly with the side chain nitrogen of Lys6874 and forms water-mediated interactions with residues Asp6873, Lys6874, Met6840, and Asn6841. The base of U3 interacts directly with the main chain oxygen and nitrogen atoms of Ala6832 and forms a water bridge interaction with the nitrogen of the main chain of Leu6834. The whole nucleotide A4 and phosphate group of A5, the last ordered part of the capped RNA in the Crystal #2 structure, are solvent-exposed and connected to the protein by a hydrogen-bond interaction between O4′ of the A4 and the side chain oxygen of Ser6831 (Fig. 3B). The stacking interactions between bases of U3 and A4 define the position of the A4 nucleotide. It is unknown if the conformation of A4 reflects the natural interaction of nucleotides, or if a longer mRNA would form different contacts with the nsp16-nsp10 heterodimer. However, the position of m7G and first three nucleotides of the capped RNA closely match in all three structures and likely represent the accurate binding mode for this part of the capped RNA.
Metal ions stabilize the capped RNA in the nsp16 active site
The primary metal binding site is located near the HBS (Fig. 1C), with either Mg2+ or Mn2+ occupying the same site with similar interactions (Fig. 3B,C). The metal ions make both direct and water-mediated interactions with side chains of nsp16 residues and the backbone of the capped RNA. The best electron density maps were observed for Crystal #3 with two magnesium ions, both of which have near-ideal octahedral geometry (Fig. 3C). The Mg2+ in the primary metal binding site is coordinated in part by interactions with phosphate groups of the triphosphate bridge linking the cap to A1, the phosphate group of U2, and the ribose of U3. The second Mg2+ directly interacts with the U3 and A4 phosphate group oxygens and through water molecules with the side chain oxygens of the Asp6873 and the side chain nitrogen of Lys6874 (Fig. 3C). Thus, the metal ion that occupies the primary metal binding site of nsp16 properly aligns capped RNA with SAM for an efficient methyl transfer reaction. The role of metal ions in facilitating orbital alignments for efficient catalysis has been demonstrated structurally for hydride transfer reactions (34). Structural evidence for the requisite orbital alignment of substrates in RNA 2’-O-MTases (33) and ribozymes (35) has also been observed.
Asp6873 and Lys6874 alter the backbone conformation of the capped RNA in coronaviruses
Comparison of the RNA-binding site and the capped RNA conformation from the SARS-CoV-2 nsp16-nsp10 structure (PDB 7L6R) and the crystal structures of 2′-O-MTases with capped RNA for DENV NS5 (PDB 5DTO (21)), vaccinia virus (VACV) VP39 (PDB 1AV6 (36)), and human cap methyltransferase hCMTr1 (PDB 4N48 (37)) revealed that the conformation of the m7G and the location of the cap-binding pockets relative to the active sites are dramatically different (fig. S3A–D). In the nsp16-nsp10 and VP39 structures, the N7-methyl groups are nestled in the HBS pocket (fig. S3 A,C). In contrast, in NS5 and hCMTr1, for which methylation at the N7 position of the G0 is not required for the 2′-O-MTase activity (37), the N7-methyl groups are pointed toward the solvent (fig. S3 B,D). Although the m7G positions do not overlap, nucleotides N1 and N2 in all these structures are closely matched, which is consistent with the conserved mechanism of action and the structure of the catalytic site (Fig. 4A). In all but the nsp16-nsp10 structure, the N2 nucleotide is sandwiched between the N1 and N3 by base stacking interactions and these three nucleotides have limited interactions with the 2′-O-MTase residues of RNA binding grove. In the nsp16-nsp10 structure all functional groups of the nucleotides N2 and N3 are involved in an integrated and complex network of hydrogen bond interactions with residues of the LBS. The U2 base and the ribose directly interact with main chain and side chain atoms of Asp6873. The Asp6873 side chain occupies the space that is filled by N3 in all other structures and forces the U3 nucleotide to move to the opposite side of the RNA binding groove. The base of U3 is involved in direct and water-mediated interactions with Ala6832 and Leu6834 while the phosphate group interacts with Lys6874 (Fig. 3 B,C). The superposition of SARS-CoV-2 nsp16-nsp10 (PDB 7JYY) with MERS-CoV (PDB 5YNM (38)) revealed almost identical conformations of the proteins and the promontory Asp6873 and Lys6873 residues, as well as the position of the Cap moiety (Fig. 4B). Alignment of the amino acid sequences of nsp16 from representative coronaviruses (Fig. 4C; fig. S4, A and B) showed that Asp6873 is conserved across the coronaviruses, except for feline coronavirus (F-CoV). Structural alignment of nsp16 with NS5, VP39, and hCMTr1 revealed that two important residues, Asp6873 and Lys6874, are located in a four-residue loop that connects β1 and αA (Fig. 4D). This four-residue insert is uniquely present in all coronavirus nsp16 MTases and is absent from other MTases (Fig. 4E).
To test the effect of this insert on nsp16 MTase activity, we prepared nsp16 proteins with D6873A or D6872G amino acid substitutions or with a deletion of Asp6873 and Lys6874 within the loop (Δ(D6873-K6874)). Overall, Mn2+ stimulated the methyl transferase activity of nsp16 better than did Mg2+ for both the wild-type and mutant nsp16 proteins (Fig. 5, A and B). At a 30 nM protein concentration in the presence of Mn2+, we observed 10% of the maximum activity for all proteins, whereas only 2% activity was observed in the presence of Mg2+. A similar pattern was detected when we measured values for maximum activity, which was reached at an enzyme concentration of 500 nM in the presence of Mn2+, but required 1 mM enzyme in the presence of Mg2+ (Fig. 5A,B). The EC50 values for activity of the D6873A and D6873G mutants in the presence of Mn2+ were shifted higher than values obtained for the wild-type enzyme (Fig. 5C). These shifts in EC50 values were more evident in the presence of Mg2+. Notably, the Δ(D6873-K6874) mutant showed a much lower amount of activity compared to the D6873A and D6873G mutants and the wild-type enzyme. In fact, at enzyme concentrations as high as 1 μM , the activity of Δ(D6873-K6874) reached only 45% and 65% of that of the wild-type max activity in the presence of Mn2+ or Mg2+, respectively. The results of activity assays support our structural finding regarding the importance of the four-residue loop that is unique for coronavirus nsp16 MTase as well as a preference for stimulation of the methyl transfer reaction by Mn2+.
DISCUSSION
In eukaryotes, 5′ capping and subsequent 2′-O-methylation events are essential for RNA metabolism and protection from cell innate immunity responses (39). Coronaviruses and other viruses have evolved entire RNA capping and methylation machineries to modify their own RNAs, thereby increasing the translation of viral proteins and promoting the evasion of host immune responses (7, 40, 41). For this reason, the viral 2′-O-MTases are suitable targets for drug development. Thus far, all proposed in silico drugs that could target the residues of the LBS (19, 24, 26, 32) have relied on the crystal structures of DENV NS5, VACV VP39, and hCMTr1, indicating a knowledge gap for drug design.
The metal ion requirement for DENV, SARS-CoV, and MERS-CoV MTase activity is well known (11, 19, 20). However, the binding site of the metal ion and capped RNA has been shown only for the NS5 structure (21). In the NS5 structure, a Mg2+ ion directly interacts with all three phosphate groups that link the m7G with the A1, and thus neutralizes the negative charge of the triphosphate group. Three additional interactions through its hydration sphere with the bases of the capped RNA help maintain stacking interactions and stabilize the single-stranded RNA helix in the A-form. The described Mg2+ is not involved in any direct hydrogen bond interactions with the residues of the 2′-O-MTase domain. In all SARS-CoV-2 nsp16 structures reported here, the metal ions that occupy the primary metal binding site directly interact with Asn6996. This direct interaction “pins” the metal ion to the negatively charged “nest”. By neutralizing the negative charge, metal ions stabilize the unique conformation of the capped RNA and by direct interaction with Asn6996 help to hold the RNA in the RNA-binding site for methyl transfer.
Metal ions tested in the activity assays had different effects on the methyl transfer efficiency of SARS-CoV-2 nsp16. Na+ has a lower charge and Ca2+ longer metal-ligand distances than Mg2+ or Mn2+, which might yield a more extended capped RNA that is weakly attached to the binding site. We suspect this is why Na+ and Ca2+ poorly stimulated the methyl transfer reaction in our assays. Mg2+ had been considered as the primary catalytic co-factor and is reported as an important additive for nsp16 activity assays (11, 19, 20, 22). The results of our biochemical assays, by contrast, showed that Mn2+ had the highest stimulation effect on the methyl transfer reaction, and maximum activity was reached at lower concentrations of enzyme. It was also reported that Mg2+ ions in micro- to millimolar concentrations can promote the cleavage of nucleic acids (42), suggesting that Mn2+ is preferable compared to Mg2+. In addition, Mn2+ has a higher reported concentration than Mg2+ in the endoplasmic reticulum and Golgi, where the SARS-CoV-2 replication vesicles are formed (43, 44). Taken together, these findings suggest that Mn2+ is the natural co-factor for the methyl transfer reaction in SARS-CoV-2 and other coronaviruses. This information could be very helpful in design of specific inhibitors to target the metal binding site and impair the activity of the complex.
Comparison of the RNA-binding sites and the capped RNA conformations from the prior MTase structures of NS5, VP39, and HCMTr1 with those of nsp16-nsp10 complexes revealed major differences between them. These four structures can be grouped into two classes: the N7 of the m7G buried in the binding pocket, as observed in nsp16 and VP39, and N7 exposed to the solvent, as observed in NS5 and hCMTr1. Despite these differences, the superposition of these structures revealed a close match for the positions and the conformations of the first and the second nucleotides of capped RNA. This observation is in line with the conserved mechanism of the 2′-O-MTase reaction. The major differences in the conformations of the RNA are located in the extended part of the capped RNA where it interacts with the residues of the LBS. In NS5, VP39, and hCMTr1, the N1-N3 nucleotides of the capped RNA are stabilized by stacking interactions. In contrast, Asp6873 in nsp16 alters the position of the N3 and prevents the stacking of N3 to N1-N2, and Lys6874 stabilizes the position of the U3 phosphate. All functional groups of the nucleotides N2 and N3 are involved in an integrated and complex network of hydrogen bond interactions with residues of the LBS. These distinct differences were found to impact catalysis with mutation of Asp6873, leading to a reduced EC50 and deletion of Asp6873 and Lys6874 from the loop shifting the EC50 to the micromolar range.
A key advance of this work was the use of a custom-synthesized substrate RNA with ribonucleotides matched specifically to the sequences of the SARS-CoV-2 mRNA 5’-ends compared to earlier studies that employed poly(C) RNA (11, 19). Use of this substrate, however, introduced a limitation of the studies due to precious amounts of the compound, which prevented maximizing the substrate concentration for kinetic and binding assays. However, using fixed conditions, we were able to reproducibly determine the crystal structure of nsp16-nsp10 in complex with Cap-0-RNA and the product of the reaction, Cap-1-RNA. This substrate could be used to conduct biochemical assays at a fixed concentration of substrates to show the preference of the enzyme for Mn2+ over Mg2+, a requirement for the extended RNA, and the importance of the unique promontory loop in nsp16 for catalysis. These studies in total indicate that redirection of the RNA, which is also coordinated by metals, leads to close alignment of the methyl group for transfer with the target 2’-OH on the first adenosine, and this is a unique feature that is shared across coronaviruses. The structures reveal that the presence of a unique four-residue insert (D6873-K6874-G6875-V6876) that is conserved in all coronaviruses is critical for catalysis. The absence of this insert in mammalian methyltransferases makes this region a promising site for the design of selective RNA-like coronavirus-specific inhibitors.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Protein expression, purification, and crystallization
Recombinant nsp16 and nsp10 proteins were purified from Escherichia coli and crystallized as previously described (25). DNA sequences for expression of mutant nsp16 protein were also generated by synthetic DNA in the same vector (Twist Biosciences) and purified following the prior established protocol (25). To form the nsp16-nsp10 heterodimers, the pure proteins were mixed at a 1:1 molar ratio at ~2 mg/ml in buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.3), 500 mM NaCl, 1 mM Tris(2-carboxyethyl) phosphine (TCEP), 2 mM MgCl2, and 5% glycerol) and incubated for 1 h, then dialyzed in crystallization buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl, 2 mM MgCl2, 1 mM TCEP and 5% glycerol) for 2 h. SAM was added to a final concentration of 2 mM. Freshly purified pre-formed nsp16-nsp10 heterodimer was concentrated to 4.0 – 5.5 mg/ml and immediately set up for crystallization as 2-μl crystallization drops (1 μl protein: 1 μl reservoir solution) in 96-well crystallization plates.
MTase activity assays
Custom synthesized Cap-0-RNA (m7GpppAUUAAA) was obtained from Bio-Synthesis, Inc (Lewisville, TX). Cap-0 analog (m7GpppA) was obtained from New England Biolabs (catalog #S1405L). The MTase activity was measured using the MTase-Glo™ Methyltransferase bioluminescence assay (Promega) (45) according to the manufacturer’s protocol in a suitable solution for SARS-CoV-2 MTase: 20 mM Tris (pH 8.0), 1 mM EDTA, 100 nM nsp16-nsp10 heterodimer, 1 μM excess of nsp10, 5 μM SAM, 300 nM Cap-0-RNA or Cap-0 analog and 3 mM MgCl2, MnCl2, CaCl2 or 3 mM NaCl as indicated. The reactions were incubated for 1 h at 37°C and stopped with 0.5% trifluoroacetic acid. The detection solution from the kit was then added and the mixture further incubated for 30 min at room temperature, followed by the addition of the developing solution. Luminescence was measured using a TECAN Safire2 microplate reader in arbitrary units and normalized assigning 100% to the activity in presence of Mg2+ and Cap-0-RNA. The average and the standard deviation of three measurements in two independent experiments using different protein purifications (n=6) was plotted as a histogram using GraphPad Prism v9.
For determination of EC50, the assay was modified for a 384-well plate format at the Northwestern University High Throughput Analysis Laboratory. Each nsp16-nsp10 heterodimer complex was serially diluted in solution as detailed above using the Mosquito® robot. Reactions were initiated by addition of the substrates (5 μM SAM and 1 μM Cap-0-RNA) using the Mantis® liquid handler. After 1 h at 37°C, the reactions were coupled with the detection and developing solutions using Mantis® liquid handler and incubated as described above. Luminescence was measured in a TECAN Infinite M1000. The blank was defined as containing all reagents except Cap-0-RNA and this value was subtracted for each corresponding point. The values were then reported as the percentage of MTase activity compared to the wild type under the same conditions. Assays were conducted in triplicate and the experiment was independently repeated (n=6). EC50 and the standard error were calculated using four parameter logistic curve in GraphPad Prism v9 at 95% confidence interval.
Isothermal Titration Calorimetry (ITC)
Binding affinity was determined using a MicroCal PEAQ-ITC system (Malvern, Worcestershire, UK) at 25 °C. The sample cell volume was 200 μL and the total syringe volume was 40 μL. For each titration, the first injection was performed using 0.4 μl which was then followed by 18 additional injections at 2 μl per injection. The first injection was considered a void and was automatically removed from data analysis. Each injection was spaced by 120 s after a 60 s initial delay. SARS-CoV-2 samples of nsp10, nsp16 and nsp16-nsp10 were individually loaded into the sample cell and then titrated with either SAH, SAM, m7GpppA Cap analog or the m7GpppG Cap analog (New England Biolabs catalog #S1411L). All samples were dialyzed overnight in ITC buffer (200 mM NaCl, 50 mM HEPES (pH 8.0), 0.1 mM ZnCl2, and 1 mM DTT). The concentrations of SARS-CoV-2 nsp10 or nsp16 used in experiments were 200 M and 40 μM, respectively, and the concentrations of all substrates used were 500 μM. For titration experiments of the SARS-CoV-2 nsp16-nsp10, the two proteins were mixed to the final concentrations 25 μM and 200 μM, respectively, and incubated for 30 mins at room temperature. A titration of SARS-CoV-2 nsp10 into nsp16 was performed at the 8:1 ratio to ensure no enthalpy was detected for the complex formation alone. The SARS-CoV-2 nsp16-nsp10 was titrated with substrates SAH and SAM at 375 μM and each Cap analog at 280 μM. Individual titration data were analyzed with MicroCal PEAQ-ITC Analysis Software using a single-site binding model and non-linear curve fitting. Each experiment was performed in triplicate and the resulting values and standard error in the fitted parameters for N, Kd, ΔH, ΔTS, and ΔG were obtained and are summarized in table S2.
Crystal soaking experiments
Diffraction quality crystals grown from different conditions were transferred into 10-μl drops containing 5 mM SAM, 0.2 mM Cap-0-RNA, and into 10-μl drops with 5 mM SAM, 0.2 mM Cap-0-RNA and 5 mM MgCl2 or 20 mM MnCl2 in respective reservoir solutions and soaked for a different time periods from 5 minutes to 17 hours. Crystals were cryoprotected with 4 M sodium formate or 25% sucrose in respective reservoir solution and flash frozen in liquid nitrogen for data collection.
Crystal #1 was grown from 0.1 M sodium citrate (pH 5.6), 1.0 M ammonium dihydrogen phosphate, soaked for 1.5 h with 0.2 mM Cap-0-RNA, 5 mM SAM, 5 mM MgCl2 and cryoprotected with 4 M sodium formate. Crystal #2 was grown from 0.1 M citric acid (pH 5.0), 0.8 M ammonium sulfate and was soaked for 6 hours with 0.2 mM Cap-0-RNA, 5 mM SAM and 20 mM manganese chloride. Crystal #3 was grown from 0.1 M HEPES (pH 7.5), 0.5 M magnesium formate and was soaked for 6 hours with 0.2 mM Cap-0-RNA, 5 mM SAM. Crystals #2 and #3 were cryoprotected with 25% sucrose in respective reservoir solutions.
Data collection, processing, structure solution and refinement
More than 30 crystals were screened, and 32 data sets were collected at the beam lines 21ID-D and 21ID-F of the Life Sciences-Collaborative Access Team (LS-CAT) at the Advanced Photon Source (APS), Argonne National Laboratory. Images were indexed, integrated and scaled using HKL-3000 (46).
Data quality and structure refinement statistics are shown in table S2. All structures were determined by Molecular Replacement with Phaser (47) from the CCP4 Suite (48) using the crystal structure of the nsp16-nsp10 heterodimer from SARS-CoV-2 as a search model (PDB 6W4H). The initial solutions went through several rounds of refinement in REFMAC v. 5.8.0266 (49) and manual model corrections using Coot (7). The water molecules were generated using ARP/wARP (50) followed by additional rounds of refinement in REFMAC. All structures were carefully examined, and three data sets were selected for further structural studies. For all structures, the Cap-0-RNA, SAM and Mg2+ were fit into electron density maps and further refined. Inspection of anomalous and Fourier difference electron density maps revealed that, for Crystal #1 the nsp16-nsp10 heterodimer formed the complex with the Cap-0-RNA, SAM and Mg2+, for Crystal #2 the complex was formed with the Cap-1-RNA, SAH and Mn2+, and for Crystal #3 the complex was formed with the Cap-1-RNA, SAH and two Mg2+. In Crystals #1 and #3, no additional electron density was detected beyond phosphate group of A4. In Crystal #2, the presence of well-defined electron density near phosphate group of A4 allowed unambiguously extend the RNA model by adding sugar and base for A4 and phosphate group of A5. All structures were further refined with the Translation–Libration–Screw (TLS) group corrections, which were created by the TLSMD server (51). The quality control of the models during refinement and for the final validation of the structures were done using MolProbity (52) (http://molprobity.biochem.duke.edu/). The capped RNA has a 5′-5′ triphosphate linkage between m7G and A1 with non-canonical RNA backbone geometry, which resulted in low RNA backbone scores in MolProbity reports. All structures were deposited to Validated SARS-CoV-2 related structural models of potential drug targets (https://covid19.bioreproducibility.org/) and to the Protein Data Bank (https://www.rcsb.org/) with the assigned PDB 7JYY (Crystal #1), 7L6R (Crystal #2) and 7L6T (Crystal #3). Flexible parts of the structure, alternative side chain conformations, and partial water molecules were fit into electron density maps at a lower σ level, which resulted in overall high RSRZ scores for all structures. All figures with models of the structures were created in PyMOL open source V 2.1 (53); the diagram showing protein and capped RNA interactions was created in LigPlot+ (54).
Structural, sequence alignment and phylogenic analysis
The PDB coordinates of SARS-CoV-2 nsp16 and nsp10 were analyzed using the FATCAT (55), POSA (56) and DALI (57) servers to perform structural alignments with MERS-CoV, NS5, hCMTr1 and VP39 cap RNA MTases. Generated PDB files were downloaded from the servers and modeled in PyMOL open-source v2.1. The protein sequence of 2′-O-MTases were obtained from the National Center for Biotechnology Information database; feline coronavirus (F-CoV, AGT52079), murine hepatitis virus (MHV, YP_009915686.1), Human coronavirus (HKU1, YP_460023.1), Human coronavirus 229E (H-CoV-229E, AGT21344.1:6464-6763), Infectious bronchitis virus (IBV, NP_066134.1:6328-6629), dengue virus nonstructural protein NS5 (NS5, NP_739590.2), Homo sapiens (hCMTr1, BAA07893.3 KIAA0082) and vaccinia virus VP39 (VP39, NC_006998.1). The multiple sequence alignment was performed using Clustal-O (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/msa/clustalo/) and merged with the coordinates of the structure with PDB code 7JYY using ESPript 3.x (58). The phylogenic tree was created using MacVector and processed in iTol (https://itol.embl.de)
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments:
We thank Grant Wiersum, Olga Kiryukhina, Ievgeniia Dubrovska and Shantanu Shukla for technical assistance in protein expression, purification, crystallization and activity assays and Masoud Vedadi (University of Toronto) for helpful advice on obtaining the substrate. We thank the Northwestern Recombinant Protein Production Core, especially Sergeii Pshenychnyi, for nsp16 purification and High Throughput Analysis Laboratory, especially Sara Fernandez Dunne, for technical assistance in the high throughput assay. This research used resources of the Advanced Photon Source, a U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Science User Facility operated for the DOE Office of Science by Argonne National Laboratory under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357. Use of the LS-CAT Sector 21 was supported by the Michigan Economic Development Corporation and the Michigan Technology Tri-Corridor (Grant 085P1000817).
Funding:
NIAID/NIH/HHS Contract HHSN272201700060C (A.M. and K.S.); Chicago Biomedical Consortium COVID Response Award CR-003 (K.S.); NCI CCSG P30 CA060553 (K.S. and HTAL core facility); P.H. was funded by NCI R01-CA142861 (to L. Laimins).
Footnotes
Competing interests: K.J.F.S. has a financial interest in Situ Biosciences, LLC, a contract research organization that conducts antimicrobial testing for industrial products, including antiviral testing. This work has no overlap with the interests of the company. K.J.F.S. is a consultant for a healthcare firm on public health topics related to COVID-19 that are unrelated to this article. A.D.M. has pending intellectual property related to coronaviruses including SARS-CoV-2 but none are related to this project. A.D.M. serves as a consultant for pharmaceutical companies on topics related to SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 that are unrelated to this article. All other authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Data and materials availability:
Structures reported are available from the RCSB Protein Data Bank (www.rcsb.org) and from covid19.bioreproducibility.org with accession numbers 7JYY, 7L6R, and 7L6T. Recombinant protein expression plasmids are available from www.beiresources.org under their standard MTA agreement. All other data needed to evaluate the conclusions in the paper are in the paper or the Supplementary Materials.
References and Notes
- 1.Dong E, Du H, Gardner L, An interactive web-based dashboard to track COVID-19 in real time. Lancet Infect Dis 20, 533–534 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Gorbalenya AE, Enjuanes L, Ziebuhr J, Snijder EJ, Nidovirales: evolving the largest RNA virus genome. Virus Res 117, 17–37 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Cui J, Li F, Shi ZL, Origin and evolution of pathogenic coronaviruses. Nat Rev Microbiol 17, 181–192 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kim D, Lee JY, Yang JS, Kim JW, Kim VN, Chang H, The Architecture of SARS-CoV-2 Transcriptome. Cell 181, 914–921 e910 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Rangan R, Zheludev IN, Das R, RNA genome conservation and secondary structure in SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-related viruses. bioRxiv, (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Dong H, Fink K, Zust R, Lim SP, Qin CF, Shi PY, Flavivirus RNA methylation. J Gen Virol 95, 763–778 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Daffis S, Szretter KJ, Schriewer J, Li J, Youn S, Errett J, Lin TY, Schneller S, Zust R, Dong H, Thiel V, Sen GC, Fensterl V, Klimstra WB, Pierson TC, Buller RM, Gale M Jr., Shi PY, Diamond MS, 2’-O methylation of the viral mRNA cap evades host restriction by IFIT family members. Nature 468, 452–456 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Fernandez de Castro I, Fernandez JJ, Barajas D, Nagy PD, Risco C, Three-dimensional imaging of the intracellular assembly of a functional viral RNA replicase complex. J Cell Sci 130, 260–268 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Snijder EJ, Limpens R, de Wilde AH, de Jong AWM, Zevenhoven-Dobbe JC, Maier HJ, Faas F, Koster AJ, Barcena M, A unifying structural and functional model of the coronavirus replication organelle: Tracking down RNA synthesis. PLoS Biol 18, e3000715 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Knoops K, Kikkert M, Worm SH, Zevenhoven-Dobbe JC, van der Meer Y, Koster AJ, Mommaas AM, Snijder EJ, SARS-coronavirus replication is supported by a reticulovesicular network of modified endoplasmic reticulum. PLoS Biol 6, e226 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Bouvet M, Debarnot C, Imbert I, Selisko B, Snijder EJ, Canard B, Decroly E, In vitro reconstitution of SARS-coronavirus mRNA cap methylation. PLoS Pathog 6, e1000863 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Walker AP, Fan H, Keown JR, Grimes JM, Fodor E, Identification of guanylyltransferase activity in the SARS-CoV-2 RNA polymerase. bioRxiv, 2021.2003.2017.435913 (2021). [Google Scholar]
- 13.Yan L, Ge J, Zheng L, Zhang Y, Gao Y, Wang T, Huang Y, Yang Y, Gao S, Li M, Liu Z, Wang H, Li Y, Chen Y, Guddat LW, Wang Q, Rao Z, Lou Z, Cryo-EM Structure of an Extended SARS-CoV-2 Replication and Transcription Complex Reveals an Intermediate State in Cap Synthesis. Cell 184, 184–193 e110 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Chen Y, Guo D, Molecular mechanisms of coronavirus RNA capping and methylation. Virol Sin 31, 3–11 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ramanathan A, Robb GB, Chan SH, mRNA capping: biological functions and applications. Nucleic Acids Res 44, 7511–7526 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ke M, Chen Y, Wu A, Sun Y, Su C, Wu H, Jin X, Tao J, Wang Y, Ma X, Pan JA, Guo D, Short peptides derived from the interaction domain of SARS coronavirus nonstructural protein nsp10 can suppress the 2’-O-methyltransferase activity of nsp10/nsp16 complex. Virus Res 167, 322–328 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Wang Y, Sun Y, Wu A, Xu S, Pan R, Zeng C, Jin X, Ge X, Shi Z, Ahola T, Chen Y, Guo D, Coronavirus nsp10/nsp16 Methyltransferase Can Be Targeted by nsp10-Derived Peptide In Vitro and In Vivo To Reduce Replication and Pathogenesis. J Virol 89, 8416–8427 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Bouvet M, Imbert I, Subissi L, Gluais L, Canard B, Decroly E, RNA 3’-end mismatch excision by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus nonstructural protein nsp10/nsp14 exoribonuclease complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109, 9372–9377 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Chen Y, Su C, Ke M, Jin X, Xu L, Zhang Z, Wu A, Sun Y, Yang Z, Tien P, Ahola T, Liang Y, Liu X, Guo D, Biochemical and structural insights into the mechanisms of SARS coronavirus RNA ribose 2’-O-methylation by nsp16/nsp10 protein complex. PLoS Pathog 7, e1002294 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Decroly E, Debarnot C, Ferron F, Bouvet M, Coutard B, Imbert I, Gluais L, Papageorgiou N, Sharff A, Bricogne G, Ortiz-Lombardia M, Lescar J, Canard B, Crystal structure and functional analysis of the SARS-coronavirus RNA cap 2’-O-methyltransferase nsp10/nsp16 complex. PLoS Pathog 7, e1002059 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Zhao Y, Soh TS, Lim SP, Chung KY, Swaminathan K, Vasudevan SG, Shi PY, Lescar J, Luo D, Molecular basis for specific viral RNA recognition and 2’-O-ribose methylation by the dengue virus nonstructural protein 5 (NS5). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112, 14834–14839 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Aouadi W, Blanjoie A, Vasseur JJ, Debart F, Canard B, Decroly E, Binding of the Methyl Donor S-Adenosyl-l-Methionine to Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2’-O-Methyltransferase nsp16 Promotes Recruitment of the Allosteric Activator nsp10. J Virol 91, (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Kim Y, Jerdrzejcak R, Maltseva N, Endres M, Godzik A, Joachimiak AJ, Crystal Structure of the methyltransferase-stimulatory factor complex of NSP16 and NSP10 from SARS CoV-2. RCSB Protein Data Bank. 2020. ( 10.2210/pdb6w61/pdb). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Krafcikova P, Silhan J, Nencka R, Boura E, Structural analysis of the SARS-CoV-2 methyltransferase complex involved in RNA cap creation bound to sinefungin. Nat Commun 11, 3717 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Rosas-Lemus M, Minasov G, Shuvalova L, Inniss NL, Kiryukhina O, Brunzelle J, Satchell KJF, High-resolution structures of the SARS-CoV-2 2’-O-methyltransferase reveal strategies for structure-based inhibitor design. Sci Signal 13, (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Viswanathan T, Arya S, Chan SH, Qi S, Dai N, Misra A, Park JG, Oladunni F, Kovalskyy D, Hromas RA, Martinez-Sobrido L, Gupta YK, Structural basis of RNA cap modification by SARS-CoV-2. Nat Commun 11, 3718 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Wilamowski M, Sherrell DA, Minasov G, Kim Y, Shuvalova L, Lavens A, Chard R, Maltseva N, Jedrzejczak R, Rosas-Lemus M, Saint N, Foster IT, Michalska K, Satchell KJF, Joachimiak A, Methylation of RNA Cap in SARS-CoV-2 captured by serial crystallography. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 118, e2100170118 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Lin S, Chen H, Ye F, Chen Z, Yang F, Zheng Y, Cao Y, Qiao J, Yang S, Lu G, Crystal structure of SARS-CoV-2 nsp10/nsp16 2’-O-methylase and its implication on antiviral drug design. Signal Transduct Target Ther 5, 131 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Viswanathan T, Misra A, Chan SH, Qi S, Dai N, Arya S, Martinez-Sobrido L, Gupta YK, A metal ion orients mRNA to ensure accurate 2’- O ribosyl methylation of the first nucleotide of the SARS-CoV-2 genome. bioRxiv, (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Wei SM, Yang L, Ke ZH, Guo DY, Fan CP, Crystal structure of MERS-CoV nsp10/nsp16 complex. RCSB Protein Data Bank. 2018. ( 10.2210/pdb5YN5/pdb). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Rangan R, Zheludev IN, Hagey RJ, Pham EA, Wayment-Steele HK, Glenn JS, Das R, RNA genome conservation and secondary structure in SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-related viruses: a first look. RNA 26, 937–959 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Wilamowski M, Sherrell DA, Minasov G, Kim Y, Shuvalova L, Lavens A, Chard R, Maltseva N, Jedrzejczak R, Rosas-Lemus M, Saint N, Foster IT, Michalska K, Satchell KJF, Joachimiak A, Methylation of RNA Cap in SARS-CoV-2 captured by serial crystallography. bioRxiv, 2020.2008.2014.251421 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Li C, Xia Y, Gao X, Gershon PD, Mechanism of RNA 2’-O-methylation: evidence that the catalytic lysine acts to steer rather than deprotonate the target nucleophile. Biochemistry 43, 5680–5687 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Mesecar AD, Stoddard BL, Koshland DE Jr., Orbital steering in the catalytic power of enzymes: small structural changes with large catalytic consequences. Science 277, 202–206 (1997). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Scott WG, Ribozyme catalysis via orbital steering. J Mol Biol 311, 989–999 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Hodel AE, Gershon PD, Quiocho FA, Structural basis for sequence-nonspecific recognition of 5’-capped mRNA by a cap-modifying enzyme. Mol Cell 1, 443–447 (1998). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Smietanski M, Werner M, Purta E, Kaminska KH, Stepinski J, Darzynkiewicz E, Nowotny M, Bujnicki JM, Structural analysis of human 2’-O-ribose methyltransferases involved in mRNA cap structure formation. Nat Commun 5, 3004 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Wei SM, Yang L, Ke ZH, Guo DY, Fan CP, Crystal structure of MERS-CoV nsp16/nsp10 complex bound to SAM and m7GpppA. RCSB Protein Data Bank. 2018. ( 10.2210/pdb5YNM/pdb). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Leung DW, Amarasinghe GK, When your cap matters: structural insights into self vs non-self recognition of 5’ RNA by immunomodulatory host proteins. Curr Opin Struct Biol 36, 133–141 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Arico E, Bracci L, Castiello L, Gessani S, Belardelli F, Are we fully exploiting type I Interferons in today’s fight against COVID-19 pandemic? Cytokine Growth Factor Rev, (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Menachery VD, Debbink K, Baric RS, Coronavirus non-structural protein 16: evasion, attenuation, and possible treatments. Virus Res 194, 191–199 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Forconi M, Herschlag D, Metal ion-based RNA cleavage as a structural probe. Methods Enzymol 468, 91–106 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Kellokumpu S, Golgi pH, Ion and Redox Homeostasis: How Much Do They Really Matter? Front Cell Dev Biol 7, 93 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Van Baelen K, Dode L, Vanoevelen J, Callewaert G, De Smedt H, Missiaen L, Parys JB, Raeymaekers L, Wuytack F, The Ca2+/Mn2+ pumps in the Golgi apparatus. Biochim Biophys Acta 1742, 103–112 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Hsiao K, Zegzouti H, Goueli SA, Methyltransferase-Glo: a universal, bioluminescent and homogenous assay for monitoring all classes of methyltransferases. Epigenomics 8, 321–329 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Minor W, Cymborowski M, Otwinowski Z, Chruszcz M, HKL-3000: the integration of data reduction and structure solution--from diffraction images to an initial model in minutes. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 62, 859–866 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.McCoy AJ, Grosse-Kunstleve RW, Adams PD, Winn MD, Storoni LC, Read RJ, Phaser crystallographic software. J Appl Crystallogr 40, 658–674 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Winn MD, Ballard CC, Cowtan KD, Dodson EJ, Emsley P, Evans PR, Keegan RM, Krissinel EB, Leslie AG, McCoy A, McNicholas SJ, Murshudov GN, Pannu NS, Potterton EA, Powell HR, Read RJ, Vagin A, Wilson KS, Overview of the CCP4 suite and current developments. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 67, 235–242 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Murshudov GN, Skubak P, Lebedev AA, Pannu NS, Steiner RA, Nicholls RA, Winn MD, Long F, Vagin AA, REFMAC5 for the refinement of macromolecular crystal structures. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 67, 355–367 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Morris RJ, Perrakis A, Lamzin VS, ARP/wARP and automatic interpretation of protein electron density maps. Methods Enzymol 374, 229–244 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Painter J, Merritt EA, Optimal description of a protein structure in terms of multiple groups undergoing TLS motion. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 62, 439–450 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Chen VB, Arendall WB 3rd, Headd JJ, Keedy DA, Immormino RM, Kapral GJ, Murray LW, Richardson JS, Richardson DC, MolProbity: all-atom structure validation for macromolecular crystallography. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 66, 12–21 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.DeLano WL, Pymol: An open-source molecular graphics tool. CCP4 Newsletter On Protein Crystallog, 82–92 (2002). [Google Scholar]
- 54.Laskowski RA, Swindells MB, LigPlot+: multiple ligand-protein interaction diagrams for drug discovery. J Chem Inf Model 51, 2778–2786 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Ye Y, Godzik A, FATCAT: a web server for flexible structure comparison and structure similarity searching. Nucleic Acids Res 1, 582–585 (2004). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Li Z, Natarajan P, Ye Y, Hrabe T, Godzik A, POSA: a user-driven, interactive multiple protein structure alignment server. Nucleic Acids Res 42, W240–245 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Holm L, Rosenstrom P, Dali server: conservation mapping in 3D. Nucleic Acids Res 38, W545–549 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Robert X, Gouet P, Deciphering key features in protein structures with the new ENDscript server. Nucleic Acids Res 42, W320–324 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Weiss M, Global indicators of X-ray data quality. Journal of Applied Crystallography 34, 130–135 (2001). [Google Scholar]
- 60.Karplus PA, Diederichs K, Linking crystallographic model and data quality. Science 336, 1030–1033 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Chen VB, Arendall WB 3rd, Headd JJ, Keedy DA, Immormino RM, Kapral GJ, Murray LW, Richardson JS, Richardson DC, MolProbity: all-atom structure validation for macromolecular crystallography. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 66, 12–21 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Structures reported are available from the RCSB Protein Data Bank (www.rcsb.org) and from covid19.bioreproducibility.org with accession numbers 7JYY, 7L6R, and 7L6T. Recombinant protein expression plasmids are available from www.beiresources.org under their standard MTA agreement. All other data needed to evaluate the conclusions in the paper are in the paper or the Supplementary Materials.