Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jan 14.
Published in final edited form as: Alzheimers Dement. 2021 May 5;17(12):2020–2029. doi: 10.1002/alz.12357

Water Exchange Rate across the Blood-Brain Barrier is Associated with CSF Amyloid-β 42 in Healthy Older Adults

Brian T Gold 1,4,5,*, Xingfeng Shao 6,*, Tiffany L Sudduth 4, Gregory A Jicha 2,4, Donna M Wilcock 3,4, Elayna R Seago 1, Danny JJ Wang 6,7
PMCID: PMC8717840  NIHMSID: NIHMS1764184  PMID: 33949773

Abstract

Introduction:

We tested if water exchange across the blood-brain-barrier (BBB), estimated with a noninvasive MRI technique, is associated with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and neuropsychological function.

Methods:

Forty cognitively normal older adults (67–86 years old) were scanned with diffusion-prepared, arterial spin labeling (DP-ASL) which estimates water exchange rate across the BBB (kw). Participants also underwent CSF draw and neuropsychological testing. Multiple linear regression models were run with kw as a predictor of CSF concentrations and neuropsychological scores.

Results:

In multiple brain regions, BBB kw was positively associated with CSF Aβ42 concentration levels. BBB kw was only moderately associated with neuropsychological performance.

Discussion:

Our results suggest that low water exchange rate across the BBB is associated with low CSF Aβ42 concentration. These findings suggest that kw may be a promising noninvasive indicator of BBB Aβ clearance functions, a possibility which should be further tested in future research.

Keywords: MRI, water exchange, BBB, biomarker, CSF, glymphatic

Background

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the most common form of dementia, currently affecting more than 6 million Americans1. AD is characterized by progressive neuropathological changes that begin decades before the manifestation of cognitive and clinical declines2,3. Increasing evidence suggests that sporadic AD is associated with reduced amyloid-β (Aβ) clearance4,5. The blood-brain-barrier (BBB) is a key structure involved in Aβ clearance (via glymphatic and/or cerebrovascular function). The BBB consists of non-fenestrated vessels which tightly regulate the movement of ions and molecules between the blood and CNS6,7. The BBB serves to transport nutrients from the endothelial lumen and to protect the CNS from pathogens, toxins and inflammation among other functions6,7.

Of particular relevance to AD, the BBB is involved in the clearance of interstitial solutes, including Aβ, from the brain8,9. A key BBB clearance pathway operates through a set of perivascular water channels (aquaporin-4; AQP4) at astrocytic endfeet. However, AQP4 channels are abnormally expressed in AD brains10,11, which might potentially limit the clearance of Aβ12,13,11. For example, AQP4-deficient mice show significantly decreased water exchange rate, reflecting a potential delay in clearance of Aβ and other CNS solutes, compared to their wild-type counterparts14.

Results from these postmortem human studies and animal models support a hypothesis that decreased water exchange rate across the BBB may be associated with reduced Aβ clearance in living humans. Testing this hypothesis requires a technique which can measure subtle alterations in water (and potentially solute) exchange rate across the BBB. The most commonly used MRI technique for assessment of BBB damage is dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI. DCE-MRI can track paracellular leakage of gadolinium contrast as it passes between blood and brain (Ktrans), revealing important information about advanced tissue disruption. However, DCE-MRI may be less suited to assess more subtle forms of BBB dysfunction associated with alterations in active transport systems9 although there may be DCE applications capable of assessing perfusion15.

Recently, a noninvasive diffusion prepared arterial spin labeling (DP-ASL) MRI method has been validated for quantification of water exchange across the BBB1618. The DP-ASL technique uses multiple diffusion weightings to differentiate magnetically tagged water signal from the capillary and brain parenchyma compartments based on a ~100-fold diffusion coefficient difference. The rate of water exchange (kw) between these compartments is derived using a two-compartment model of the ASL signal with single-pass approximation (SPA)17. The kw metric represents a ratio of capillary permeability surface area product of water (PSw) by capillary volume (Vc).

A recent validation study demonstrated that reduced kw using this technique corresponds with both mannitol-induced BBB breakdown and histology in animal models19. DP-ASL kw was also found to be correlated with DCE Ktrans in some brain regions20. The moderate correlations observed between DP-ASL kw and DCE Ktrans may reflect overlapping yet different mechanisms assessed by these two metrics. The DCE and DP-ASL techniques also involve trade-offs. For example, DCE Ktrans provides higher spatial resolution. In contrast, DP-ASL likely provides a more sensitive marker of early-stage BBB dysfunction based on water exchange rate being about ~6000x faster than the exchange rate of gadolinium across the BBB20. DP-ASL also allows for computation of measures of cerebral perfusion such as cerebral blood flow (CBF) and arterial transit time (ATT), as assessed in the present study.

Here we sought to determine if water exchange rate across the BBB (kw) is associated with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers of AD pathology (abeta42; Aβ42, total-tau; t-tau, hyperphosphorylated-tau; p-tau) in cognitively normal older adults. We hypothesized that kw would be associated with CSF Aβ given that Aβ aggregates in interstitial fluid, and is thought to be cleared via BBB-related glymphatic mechanisms. In particular, we predicted that low kw would be associated with low levels of CSF Aβ, which reflect high Aβ deposition in neuritic plaques21,22. A second, exploratory aim of the present study was to assess potential relationships between kw and neuropsychological function. Specifically, we assessed if kw was associated with performance on measures of episodic memory and executive function, cognitive domains of high relevance to preclinical AD.

Methods

Participants

Forty cognitively normal (CN) older adults were included in this study. One participant was excluded from analyses due to the presence of an old stroke within the right motor cortex that was not clinically evident by history at enrollment in the ADRC cohort. Summary group demographic characteristics of the 39 participants remaining participants (20 female, mean age=72.7) are shown in Table 1. All participants provided informed consent under a protocol approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Kentucky (UK). Participants were recruited from an existing longitudinal cohort of CN older adults at UK’s Sanders-Brown Center on Aging (SBCoA)23. Exclusionary criteria for enrollment into the SBCoA cohort include major head injury, major psychiatric illness or current substance abuse, medical illnesses that are nonstable, impairing, or that have an effect on the CNS, chronic infectious diseases, major stroke, encephalitis, meningitis, or epilepsy23.

Table 1.

Mean Group Demographic Values and CSF AD Biomarker Values

N 39
Age (Years) 72.7 [67–86]
Sex (F/M) 20/19
Education (Years) 16.64 (2.26)
MMSE 28.90 (1.43)
Aβ42 (pg/ml) 294.85 (76.13)
T-tau 62.74 (26.82)
P-tau 23.23 (16.46)

Notes: The table lists the total number of participants, mean and range for age, male/female distribution and mean and standard deviation (SD) for years of education, MMSE, Aβ42, t-tau and p-tau (pg/ml).

Additional exclusion criteria for the present MRI study were claustrophobia, pacemakers, the presence of metal fragments or any metal implants that are incompatible with MRI. The majority of participants at UK’s SBCoA agree to lumbar CSF draw. In the present MRI study, CN participants were recruited from the SBCoA on the basis of having available CSF data. A diagnosis of CN was established based on clinical consensus scores from the Uniform Data Set (UDS3) used by US Alzheimer’s Disease Research Centers (ADRCs) 24 and a score of 26 or higher on the Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE).

Imaging Protocol

Participants were scanned with a Siemens 3T PRISMA scanner, using a 64-channel head-coil, at UK’s Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Spectroscopy Center. The following sequences were collected: a high resolution, multi-echo, T1-weighted anatomical image (MEMPR) and a 3D Gradient-and-Spin-Echo (GRASE) diffusion-prepared pCASL (DP-pCASL) sequence. The MEMPR sequence had four echoes [repetition time (TR)=2530ms; first echo time (TE1)=1.69ms echo time spacing (ΔTE)=1.86ms, flip angle (FA)=7°] and covered the entire brain [176 slices, field of view=256mm, parallel imaging (GRAPPA) factor=2, 1mm isotropic voxels, scan duration=5.53min].

The DP-pCASL sequence was performed with the following parameters: TR=4sec, TE=36.5ms, FOV=224mm, matrix size=64×64, 12 slices (10% oversampling), resolution=3.5×3.5×8mm3, label/control duration=1500ms, centric ordering and optimized timing of background suppression for gray matter (GM) and white matter (WM) 25. A two-stage approach was utilized to measure ATT and kw: Fifteen repetitions were acquired during the flow encoding arterial spin tagging (FEAST) scan at post-labeling delay (PLD)=900ms and diffusion weighting (b-value) of 0 and 14 s/mm2 with a total acquisition time of 4 minutes for estimating ATT16. The kw metric was calculated from scans acquired at PLD=1800ms, when the labeled blood reaches the microvascular compartment, with b = 0 and 50 s/mm2, respectively. Twenty repetitions were acquired for each b-value of the kw scan, and the total acquisition time was 6 minutes. CBF was quantified from perfusion signals acquired at PLD=1800ms without diffusion preparation as described in detail elsewhere18.

DP-ASL Analyses: TGV Regularized SPA Modeling for BBB Water Exchange Rate (kw) Mapping

Control/label images were corrected for rigid head motion using SPM12 (Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, UCL) and subtracted to obtain perfusion images. Temporal fluctuations were minimized using principal component analysis26. For DP-pCASL, the tissue and capillary compartments of the ASL signal were separated by a small diffusion gradient of 50 s/mm2. The kw map was calculated by a total-generalized-variation (TGV)27 regularized SPA model17 using the tissue (or capillary) fraction of the ASL signal at the PLD of 1800ms, incorporating ATT, T1 of arterial blood and brain tissue as inputs for the algorithm18. Arterial blood T1 was assumed to be 1.66 s, which is commonly used for CBF quantification28. Our simulation indicated that variations in arterial blood T1 (1.5s to 2.1s) led to <4% variations in kw. A voxel-wise tissue T1 map was fitted from background suppressed control images acquired at 2 PLDs26.The kw, ATT and CBF maps, along with the M0 (T2 weighted structural image in the same space), were normalized to Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) template space, and average values were measured in six regions of interests (ROIs) of relevance to AD: whole brain, frontal lobe, temporal lobe, parietal lobe, precuenus and medial temporal lobe (MTL; amygdala, hippocampus and parahippocampal gyrus). These ROIs were selected from the Anatomical Labeling Template in SPM, using participants’ T1-weighted images, as described previously29.

Cerebrospinal Fluid Collection and Analysis

CSF was drawn the morning after fasting since midnight according to current ADRC best practices/NIA guidelines. CSF lumbar draw was performed by a trained neurologist at the SBCoA (G.A.J) and then banked by the UK-ADRC Neuropathology Core. CSF was collected using a 20-gauge needle, 15ml sterile polypropylene collection tubes, and was stored in single use 0.5ml aliquots in polypropylene storage tubes at −80°C. CSF was analyzed using the Quanterix Simoa platform. Aβ1–42 and phosphorylated-tau181 (p-tau181) and total-tau (t-tau) were measured on the HD-1 instrument using the Neuro 3-plex A (Aβ40, Aβ42, total tau) assay at 1:200 and the pTau181 assay at 1:20 according to manufacturer’s instructions. CSF samples were quantified in units of picograms per milliliter (pg/ml).

Neuropsychological Measures

The majority of participants underwent the UDS-3 neuropsychological battery and several additional measures administered to UK-ADRC participants. Composite measures of cognition were constructed for the AD-relevant domains of executive function and episodic memory. The executive function (EF) composite measure included the Trail Making Test Part A (TMT-A), Trail Making Test Part B (TMT-B) and the Digit Symbol test from the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-IV (WAIS-DS). Scores on the TMT-A were regressed out of scores on the TMT-B and WAIS-DS in order to exclude components of raw processing and motor speed common to these tests (Salthouse, 2011). The resulting residuals were then combined to form a composite EF score by subtracting the TMT-B residuals (higher scores = worse performance) from the WAIS-DS residuals (higher scores = better performance) and dividing by 2. Therefore, higher EF composite scores reflected better performance. The episodic memory (MEM) composite included the CRAFT delayed recall and Benton Figure delayed recall. Total scores were divided by 2. Higher MEM composite scores reflected better performance.

Statistical Analyses

Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 24 (IBM, Chicago, IL, USA). A series of multiple regression models were run to assess potential relationships between DP-ASL metrics with CSF biomarkers of AD and neuropsychological scores. Age and sex were included as covariates in all regression models. For the first set of analyses, separate multiple linear regression models were first run with DP-ASL metrics (kw, CBF or ATT) as predictor variables of CSF biomarkers of AD (Aβ42, t-tau or p-tau). These initial regression models were statistically corrected for the 6 ROIs tested (p=0.05 / 6 ROIs; FWE, p=0.008). For the second set of analyses, separate multiple linear regression models were run to determine if kw in any of those ROIs showing associations with CSF biomarkers of AD pathology (from the first set of regression models) were also associated with neuropsychological scores (EF or MEM composite scores). This second set of multiple linear regression analyses were statistically corrected for the 8 comparisons run (4 ROIs x 2 cognitive domains) (p=0.05 / 8; FWE, p=0.006).

For all regression models, assumptions of normality and heteroscedasticity of variance were explored by generating P-P plots, histograms and scatterplots of residuals. Evaluation of these plots showed that our reported regression models met assumptions of normality and homoscedasticity. Multi-collinearity between predictors was explored using the variance inflation factor (VIF), with an upper limit of 5 implemented as a threshold value 30. The VIF is reported for all models, with none exceeding a value of 1.5. Scatterplots of standardized residuals were created using participant z-scores values. Potential outliers in residual values were identified as being greater than 3 standard deviations from their group mean 31,32.

Results

The original data file and statistical results file are available as supplementary material. Summary group demographic and AD fluid biomarker characteristics of the 39 participants included in data analyses are shown in Table 1, with summary group DP-ASL values shown in Table 2.

Table 2.

Mean Group Values for DP-ASL Metrics of kw, ATT and CBF

kw ATT CBF
Whole Brain 98.27 (19.77) 1223.01 (101.65) 32.17 (9.02)
Frontal Lobe 104.42 (22.18) 1232.48 (115.90) 31.74 (9.65)
Temporal Lobe 94.76 (26.06) 1167.48 (116.63) 32.97 (9.94)
Parietal Lobe 83.21 (28.34) 1353.37 (148.20) 31.24 (11.54)
Precuneus 85.96 (28.79) 1334.03 (159.04) 33.24 (10.89)
Medial Temporal Lobe 85.87 (27.32) 942.38 (223.70) 22.88 (8.76)

Notes: The table lists mean and standard deviation (SD) in each ROI for the metrics of kw, ATT and CBF.

Relationships between Kw and Fluid Biomarkers of AD Pathology

Relationships between kw in ROIs (Figure 1) and fluid biomarkers of AD pathology were explored. Results (Table 3) indicated significant associations (FWE corrected p=0.008) between CSF Aβ42 concentration and kw values in the whole brain (beta=0.51, t=3.4, p=0.002; VIF=1.04), frontal lobe (beta=0.50, t=3.4, p=0.002; VIF=1.04), parietal lobe (beta=0.56, t=3.9, p<0.001; VIF=1.03) and precuneus (beta=0.46, t=3.1, p=0.004; VIF=1.02), after controlling for age and sex (Figure 2, Panels A-D). The association between CSF Aβ42 concentration and kw in the temporal lobe did not meet corrected significance (beta=0.42, t=2.6, p=0.015; VIF=1.11; Panel E). There was no relationship between CSF Aβ42 concentration and kw in the MTL (beta= 0.21, t=1.2, p=0.236; VIF=1.13; Panel F). There were no significant associations between kw in any of the ROIs and CSF t-tau concentration (P’s ≥0.321) or between kw in any of the ROIs and CSF p-tau concentration (P’s ≥0.082).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Sample ROIs. Representations of masks used to extract values from the frontal lobe (maroon), temporal lobe (yellow), parietal lobe (orange) and precuneus (blue). ROIs are presented on a T1-weighted image (first row) and on a representative participant’s kw map in normalized space (second row). Columns from left-to-right show horizontal slices moving in the inferior-to-superior direction. The same ROI masks were used for extraction of ATT and CBF values.

Table 3.

Relationships between kw and Fluid Biomarkers of AD pathology

CSF Aβ42 CSF T-Tau CSF P-Tau
BBB Water Exchange (kw) Beta-Value P-Value Beta-Value P-Value Beta-Value P-Value
Whole Brain 0.51 0.002 0.09 0.549 −0.24 0.167
Frontal Lobe 0.50 0.002 0.01 0.999 −0.18 0.287
Parietal Lobe 0.56 < 0.001 0.12 0.423 −0.29 0.082
Temporal Lobe 0.42 0.015 0.16 0.321 −0.21 0.244
Precuneus 0.46 0.004 0.03 0.822 −0.24 0.150
Medial Temporal Lobe 0.21 0.236 0.12 0.464 −0.265 0.132

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Relationships between kw values and CSF Aβ42 concentration. Scatter plots show kw values in the whole brain (A), frontal lobe (B), parietal lobe (C) precuneus (D), temporal lobe (E) and MTL (F) plotted against CSF Aβ42 concentration. Plots show residual associations after controlling for age and sex.

Relationships between ATT, CBF and Fluid Biomarkers of AD Pathology

There were no significant associations (FWE corrected p=0.008) between ATT in any of the ROIs and Aβ42, p-tau or t-tau, although the relationship between ATT in the MTL and p-tau concentration level was significant at the uncorrected level (beta=−0.347, t=−2.1, p=0.042; VIF=1.10). There were no other associations between ATT in other regions and either p-tau or t-tau concentration levels (all P’s ≥0.221). There were no associations between CBF in any of the ROIs and either Aβ42, p-tau or t-tau (all P’s ≥0.121).

Relationships between kw and Neuropsychological Performance

Seven participants were missing neuropsychological data, leaving a total of 32 datasets for these analyses. To limit the number of comparisons, regression were only run for the 4 ROIs showing associations between kw and CSF Aβ42 in the above models (whole brain, frontal lobe, parietal lobe and precuneus). Results (Table 4) indicated no significant associations (FWE corrected p = 0.006) between kw in any of the 4 ROI and cognitive performance. At an uncorrected significance level, frontal lobe kw was associated with MEM composite scores (beta=0.385, t=2.25, p=0.032; VIF=1.07; Figure 3, panel A), but not with EF composite scores (beta=0.304, t=1.6 p=0.114; VIF=1.07). kw in the other ROIs was not associated with MEM composite scores (all P’s ≥0.292) or EF scores (all P’s ≥0.342).

Table 4.

Relationships between kw and Neuropsychological Scores

Episodic Memory Executive Function
BBB Water Exchange (kw) Beta-Value P-Value Beta-Value P-Value
Whole Brain 0.19 0.292 0.19 0.342
Frontal Lobe 0.385 0.032 0.304 0.114
Parietal Lobe 0.18 0.322 0.02 0.925
Precuneus 0.09 0.632 0.12 0.528

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Relations between kw in the frontal lobe and neuropsychological scores. Scatter plots show kw values in the frontal lobe against MEM composite scores, (A) and against EF composite scores, after controlling for age and sex (B).

In summary, our results indicate that low kw in multiple brain regions is associated with low CSF Aβ42 concentration. A schematic representation of the main pattern of kw-CSF Aβ42 results is illustrated in Figure 4. As can be seen in Figure 4, kw values tend to track positively with CSF concentration scores while this pattern is less evident for CBF and ATT values.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Schematic representation of findings. Maps of CBF, ATT and kw are presented from three representative participants showing the trend of increasing kw values being associated with increasing CSF Aβ42 concentration (from left to right). Participants’ whole brain CBF, ATT and kw values are presented below their maps. Participants’ CSF Aβ42 concentration values are presented at the bottom of the figure, within the white box.

Discussion

Our results provide evidence for an in vivo association between water exchange rate across the BBB (kw) and CSF Aβ42 concentration. These findings suggest that kw computed from a novel DP-pCASL sequence may be a potential indicator of BBB-related clearance functions. Implications of the kw metric for cognitive functioning in healthy older adults remain less clear as kw was only moderately associated with neuropsychological performance in our sample.

Associations of Kw, CBF and ATT with AD Fluid Biomarkers

Results indicated that low kw in the whole brain, frontal lobe, parietal lobe and precuneus were each associated with low CSF Aβ42 concentration (reflecting high cerebral Aβ). In contrast, kw was not associated with either CSF tau or p-tau in any ROI. The specificity of the link we observed between kw in cortical regions and Aβ (as opposed to t-tau and/or p-tau) is in-keeping with findings that Aβ binding is more prominent in neocortex than MTL33,34. In addition, considering potential BBB-related clearance functions, Aβ aggregates extracellularly in the parenchyma, while tau accumulation is primarily an intracellular process unless the cell dies and release its proteinaceous components into the extracellular milieu35. Thus, our findings that kw was more closely associated with CSF Aβ42 than tau appears consistent with expected role of BBB clearance functions during the preclinical (cognitively normal) stage.

Similarly, kw was the only DP-pCASL metric associated with CSF Aβ42 concentration. Neither ATT nor CBF values were associated with CSF Aβ42 concentration. kw values are a ratio of capillary permeability surface area product of water (PSw) by capillary volume (Vc). Lower kw values can result from relatively low PSw or relatively high Vc values. The PSw is influenced by alterations in water channels. If water channel function is impaired or compromised, PSw would be decreased, and kw values would be reduced. Further, as an extracellular protein, Aβ42 should be more closely linked with water exchange rate across the BBB than with measures of ATT or CBF, which are indices of cerebral perfusion. In keeping with this possibility, our results indicated that the kw metric of water exchange across the BBB, but not perfusion, was associated with CSF Aβ.

The Potential Basis of kw - Aβ42 Relationship

In late-onset sporadic AD, Aβ42 deposition appears more closely associated with impairment of Aβ efflux (clearance) than influx5,36. While direct exchange of water and CSF solutes such as Aβ may be mediated through BBB breakdown at the neurovascular interface, it might also occur through the recently described glial lymphatic (glymphatic) pathway37,38. Whereas direct CNS-vascular permeability is mediated largely by inflammation, the glymphatic pathway is dependent on the AQP4 water channel, which selectively conducts water molecules across the BBB into the glymphatic pathways. In animal models, decreased AQP4 expression has been linked with reduced Aβ42 clearance from the brain37,39 and deletion of the AQP4 gene results in increased Aβ plaque40.

AQP4 water channels are typically localized to perivascular astrocytic endfeet that surround the cerebral vasculature38,37 but are abnormally expressed in AD brains10,11. This includes both reduced localization of AQP4 to the cerebral vasculature41 and reduced AQP4 expression in the vicinity of AB plaques. Reduced AQP4 expression may in turn contribute to reduced clearance and Aβ aggregation42,13,42. Thus, low kw values from DP-ASL could in part reflect decreased localization or expression of AQP4 in individuals with higher cerebral Aβ concentration41.

Associations of Kw and Cognitive Performance

We further sought to assess the associations of low water exchange rate across the BBB with cognitive performance. Results indicated that kw was not associated with EF or MEM composite scores after controlling for multiple comparisons. Further, at an uncorrected statistical level, only the relationship between kw in frontal cortex and MEM was significant. The weak relationship between kw and neuropsychological function we observed could reflect limited sample size/power. In addition, kw reductions in CN older adults may reflect early-stage BBB dysfunction which is not yet clinically significant. Future research should address kw-cognitive relationships with larger sample sizes of adults who range in cognitive diagnosis from CN through impaired.

DP-pCASL as a Method for Quantifying Water Exchange across the BBB

Various methods have been proposed for quantifying water exchange rates including those using dynamic analysis of the first-pass signal of shutter-speed DCE-MRI43, and with a novel multi-flip angle multi-echo (MFAME) scanning protocol44. Both methods require injection of contrast agents. As an alternative, ASL techniques use water as an endogenous tracer. Global water extraction rate and PSw can be measured with phase-contrast ASL (WEPCAST)45. Kinetic models have been proposed to map the regional water exchange rate using ASL sequences with signal preparation to separate intravascular and extravascular compartments based on the T2 difference46,47,14 and the diffusion coefficient difference48,49. Considering that the pseudo-diffusion coefficient of capillary water is ~100-fold higher than that of the tissue49, our proposed DP-pCASL method applies a small diffusion gradient so that two compartments of ASL signal can be reliably and efficiently separated and a whole brain kw map can be obtained within 10 minutes.

Limitations

The kw values reported in GM ROIs are likely to include some averaging of neighboring WM signal (i.e. partial volume effects) due to the relatively coarse voxel dimensions employed (3.5×3.5×8 mm3). In addition, the specific direction of kw alterations (lower kw versus higher kw) in various neurological disorders requires further research. While reduced BBB water exchange has been associated with aging and dementia9, upregulation of AQP4 (and potentially increased kw) has been reported in vascular disorders such as diabetes50. In our previous study, increased kw was associated with increased vascular risk factors in Latinx participants18. The specific kw alterations and underlying mechanisms related to AD and small vessel disease and other neurologic disorders await to be clarified in future studies. Further, it should be recognized that this is a cross-sectional study which is limited to a description of associations. Whether disruption of the glymphatic system or the direct cerebrovascular interface is responsible for the observed associations remains unclear. Future work investigating kw in longitudinal datasets are important for answering these critical questions and driving the field forward. Such work should consider inclusion of PET-amyloid imaging for spatial localization not provided by CSF data.

Conclusions

The present results demonstrate that a non-invasive measure of water exchange rate across the BBB (kw) is associated with lumbar CSF Aβ42 concentration levels. Our results suggest that kw measured by a novel 3D GRASE DP-pCASL sequence shows promise as a non-invasive metric of BBB-related clearance in CN older adults. These findings need to be replicated in other cohorts, and in larger numbers of participants, in order to further evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of this non-invasive, potential marker of BBB-related clearance functions.

Supplementary Material

Raw Data
Results

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Dr. Shoshana Bardach for help with participant recruitment and Beverly Meacham and Eric Foreman for assisting/conducting the MRI scans. This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (grant numbers NIA R01AG055449, NIA P30 AG072946, NIGMS S10 OD023573, UH3-NS100614, R01-NS114382 and R01-EB028297). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of these granting agencies. The authors declare no competing financial interests.

References

  • 1.Brookmeyer R, Abdalla N, Kawas CH, Corrada MM. Forecasting the prevalence of preclinical and clinical Alzheimer’s disease in the United States. Alzheimer’s Dement. Published online 2018. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2017.10.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Resnick SM, Sojkova J, Zhou Y, et al. Longitudinal cognitive decline is associated with fibrillar amyloid-beta measured by [11C]PiB. Neurology. 2010;74(10):807–815. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181d3e3e9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Wilson RS, Leurgans SE, Boyle PA, Schneider JA, Bennett DA. Neurodegenerative basis of age-related cognitive decline. Neurology. 2010;75(12):1070–1078. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181f39adc [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Tarasoff-Conway JM, Carare RO, Osorio RS, et al. Imprimindo Extrato por Período. Nat Rev Neurol. 2015;11(8):457–470. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2015.119.Clearance [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Wildsmith KR, Holley M, Savage JC, Skerrett R, Landreth GE. Wildsmith et al. (2013) Evidence for impaired amyloid β clearance in Alzheimer’s disease.pdf. Published online 2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 6.Zlokovic BV The Blood-Brain Barrier in Health and Chronic Neurodegenerative Disorders. Neuron. Published online 2008. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.01.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Daneman R The blood-brain barrier in health and disease. Ann Neurol. Published online 2012. doi: 10.1002/ana.23648 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Iliff JJ, Wang M, Liao Y, et al. A paravascular pathway facilitates CSF flow through the brain parenchyma and the clearance of interstitial solutes, including amyloid β. Sci Transl Med. 2012;4(147). doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3003748 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Dickie BR, Parker GJM, Parkes LM. Measuring water exchange across the blood-brain barrier using MRI. Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc. 2020;116:19–39. doi: 10.1016/j.pnmrs.2019.09.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Pérez E, Barrachina M, Rodríguez A, et al. Aquaporin expression in the cerebral cortex is increased at early stages of Alzheimer disease. Brain Res. 2007;1128(1):164–174. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.09.109 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Misawa T, Arima K, Mizusawa H, Satoh J ichi. Close association of water channel AQP1 with amyloid-β deposition in Alzheimer disease brains. Acta Neuropathol. 2008;116(3):247–260. doi: 10.1007/s00401-008-0387-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Mestre H, Hablitz LM, Xavier ALR, et al. Aquaporin-4-dependent glymphatic solute transport in the rodent brain. Elife. 2018;7:1–31. doi: 10.7554/eLife.40070 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Zeppenfeld DM, Simon M, Haswell JD, et al. Association of perivascular localization of aquaporin-4 with cognition and Alzheimer disease in aging brains. JAMA Neurol. 2017;74(1):91–99. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2016.4370 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ohene Y, Harrison IF, Nahavandi P, et al. Non-invasive MRI of brain clearance pathways using multiple echo time arterial spin labelling: an aquaporin-4 study. Neuroimage. 2019;188(November 2018):515–523. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.12.026 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Larsson HBW, Courivaud F, Rostrup E, Hansen AE. Measurement of brain perfusion, blood volume, and blood-brain barrier permeability, using dynamic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MRI at 3 tesla. Magn Reson Med. Published online 2009. doi: 10.1002/mrm.22136 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Wang J, Fernández-Seara MA, Wang S, St Lawrence KS. When perfusion meets diffusion: In vivo measurement of water permeability in human brain. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2007;27(4):839–849. doi: 10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600398 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.St Lawrence KS, Owen D, Wang DJJ. A two-stage approach for measuring vascular water exchange and arterial transit time by diffusion-weighted perfusion MRI. Magn Reson Med. 2012;67(5):1275–1284. doi: 10.1002/mrm.23104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Shao X, Ma SJ, Casey M, D’Orazio L, Ringman JM, Wang DJJ. Mapping water exchange across the blood-brain barrier using 3D diffusion-prepared arterial spin labeled perfusion MRI. Magn Reson Med. 2019;81(5):3065–3079. doi: 10.1002/mrm.27632 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Tiwari YV, Lu J, Shen Q, Cerqueira B, Duong TQ. Magnetic resonance imaging of blood–brain barrier permeability in ischemic stroke using diffusion-weighted arterial spin labeling in rats. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2017;37(8):2706–2715. doi: 10.1177/0271678X16673385 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Shao X, Jann K, Ma SJ, et al. Comparison Between Blood-Brain Barrier Water Exchange Rate and Permeability to Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agent in an Elderly Cohort. Front Neurosci. Published online 2020. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2020.571480 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Blennow K, Mattsson N, Schöll M, Hansson O, Zetterberg H. Amyloid biomarkers in Alzheimer’s disease. Trends Pharmacol Sci. Published online 2015. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2015.03.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Klunk WE, Engler H, Nordberg A, et al. Imaging Brain Amyloid in Alzheimer’s Disease with Pittsburgh Compound-B. Ann Neurol. Published online 2004. doi: 10.1002/ana.20009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Schmitt FA, Nelson PT, Abner E, et al. University of Kentucky Sanders-Brown Healthy Brain Aging Volunteers: Donor Characteristics, Procedures and Neuropathology. Curr Alzheimer Res. 2012;9(6):724–733. doi: 10.2174/156720512801322591 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Besser L, Kukull W, Knopman DS, et al. Version 3 of the national Alzheimer’s coordinating center’s uniform data set. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. Published online 2018. doi: 10.1097/WAD.0000000000000279 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Shao X, Wang Y, Moeller S, Wang DJJ. A constrained slice-dependent background suppression scheme for simultaneous multislice pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling. Magn Reson Med. 2018;79(1):394–400. doi: 10.1002/mrm.26643 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Shao X, Tisdall MD, Wang DJ, van der Kouwe AJW. Prospective motion correction for 3D GRASE pCASL with volumetric navigators. Proc Int Soc Magn Reson Med Sci Meet Exhib Int Soc Magn Reson Med Sci Meet Exhib. Published online 2017. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Spann SM, Shao X, Wang DJ, et al. Robust single-shot acquisition of high resolution whole brain ASL images by combining time-dependent 2D CAPIRINHA sampling with spatio-temporal TGV reconstruction. Neuroimage. Published online 2020. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116337 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Lu H, Clingman C, Golay X, Van Zijl PCM. Determining the longitudinal relaxation time (T1) of blood at 3.0 tesla. Magn Reson Med. Published online 2004. doi: 10.1002/mrm.20178 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Yan L, Liu CY, Wong KP, et al. Regional association of pCASL-MRI with FDG-PET and PiB-PET in people at risk for autosomal dominant Alzheimer’s disease. NeuroImage Clin. 2018;17(November 2017):751–760. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2017.12.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Stine RA. Graphical interpretation of variance inflation factors. Am Stat. Published online 1995. doi: 10.1080/00031305.1995.10476113 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.B V, L. T Outliers in Statistical Data, 3rd Edition. J. Wiley and Sons; 1994. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.J CM, M GH, R CS. Data Analysis: A Model Comparison Approach, 2nd Edition. Routledge; 2009. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Braak H, Braak E. Neuropathological stageing of Alzheimer-related changes. Acta Neuropathol. Published online 1991. doi: 10.1007/BF00308809 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.T DR, R U, O M, B. H Phases of Aβ-deposition in the human brain and its relevance for the development of AD. Neurology. Published online 2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Binder LI, Frankfurter A, Rebhun LI. The Distribution Central Nervous of Tau in System the Mammalian. J Cell Biol. Published online 1985. doi: 10.1083/jcb.101.4.1371 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Tarasoff-Conway JM, Carare RO, Osorio RS, et al. Clearance systems in the brain - Implications for Alzheimer disease. Nat Rev Neurol. Published online 2015. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2015.119 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Iliff JJ, Wang M, Liao Y, et al. A paravascular pathway facilitates CSF flow through the brain parenchyma and the clearance of interstitial solutes, including amyloid β. Sci Transl Med. 2012;4(147). doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3003748 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Iliff JJ, Lee H, Yu M, et al. Brain-wide pathway for waste clearance captured by contrast-enhanced MRI. J Clin Invest. 2013;123(3):1299–1309. doi: 10.1172/JCI67677 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Shibata M, Yamada S, Ram Kumar S, et al. Clearance of Alzheimer’s amyloid-β1–40 peptide from brain by LDL receptor-related protein-1 at the blood-brain barrier. J Clin Invest. Published online 2000. doi: 10.1172/JCI10498 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Xu Z, Xiao N, Chen Y, et al. Deletion of aquaporin-4 in APP/PS1 mice exacerbates brain Aβ accumulation and memory deficits. Mol Neurodegener. 2015;10(1):1–16. doi: 10.1186/s13024-015-0056-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Wilcock DM, Vitek MP, Colton CA. Vascular amyloid alters astrocytic water and potassium channels in mouse models and humans with Alzheimer’s disease. Neuroscience. 2009;159(3):1055–1069. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2009.01.023 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Hoshi A, Yamamoto T, Shimizu K, et al. Characteristics of aquaporin expression surrounding senile plaques and cerebral amyloid angiopathy in Alzheimer disease. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2012;71(8):750–759. doi: 10.1097/NEN.0b013e3182632566 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Rooney WD, Li X, Sammi MK, Bourdette DN, Neuwelt EA, Springer CS. Mapping human brain capillary water lifetime: High-resolution metabolic neuroimaging. NMR Biomed. Published online 2015. doi: 10.1002/nbm.3294 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Dickie BR, Vandesquille M, Ulloa J, Boutin H, Parkes LM, Parker GJM. Water-exchange MRI detects subtle blood-brain barrier breakdown in Alzheimer’s disease rats. Neuroimage. Published online 2019. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.09.030 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Lin Z, Li Y, Su P, et al. Non-contrast MR imaging of blood-brain barrier permeability to water. Magn Reson Med. Published online 2018. doi: 10.1002/mrm.27141 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Wells JA, Siow B, Lythgoe MF, Thomas DL. Measuring biexponential transverse relaxation of the ASL signal at 9.4 T to estimate arterial oxygen saturation and the time of exchange of labeled blood water into cortical brain tissue. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2013;33(2):215–224. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2012.156 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Gregori J, Schuff N, Kern R, Günther M. T2-based arterial spin labeling measurements of blood to tissue water transfer in human brain. J Magn Reson Imaging. Published online 2013. doi: 10.1002/jmri.23822 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Wengler K, Bangiyev L, Canli T, Duong TQ, Schweitzer ME, He X. 3D MRI of whole-brain water permeability with intrinsic diffusivity encoding of arterial labeled spin (IDEALS). Neuroimage. Published online 2019. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.01.035 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Shao X, Ma SJ, Casey M, D’Orazio L, Ringman JM, Wang DJJ. Mapping water exchange across the blood–brain barrier using 3D diffusion-prepared arterial spin labeled perfusion MRI. Magn Reson Med. Published online 2019. doi: 10.1002/mrm.27632 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Plog BA, Nedergaard M. The Glymphatic System in Central Nervous System Health and Disease: Past, Present, and Future. Annu Rev Pathol Mech Dis. Published online 2018. doi: 10.1146/annurev-pathol-051217-111018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Raw Data
Results

RESOURCES