Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Feb 6.
Published in final edited form as: Rheumatology (Oxford). 2020 Jan 1;59(1):243–245. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kez287

Treatment of severe periodontitis may improve clinical disease activity in otherwise treatment-refractory rheumatoid arthritis patients

Burkhard Möller 1, Philip Bender 2, Sigrun Eick 2, Stefan Kuchen 1, Alejandra Maldonado 2, Jan Potempa 3,4, Stephan Reichenbach 1, Anton Sculean 2, Anja Schwenzer 5, Peter M Villiger 1, Alicia Wong 4,5, Kim S Midwood 5
PMCID: PMC9900607  NIHMSID: NIHMS1869554  PMID: 31292632

Sir,

immune responses against a large variety of citrullinated peptides are a hallmark of RA, with the periodontal tissue proposed as a key source of antigens. Dysbiosis in the oral microbiome during periodontitis is also associated with the onset of RA and auto-antibody generation, however links between different microbial communities and distinct autoantibody fine specificities require further clarification (1,2).

Treatment of periodontitis may induce remission in early RA (3), but did not affect disease activity in established RA in the ESPERA trial (4). In this registered study (NCT02096120; ethical approval: KEK-BE 130/13) we investigated the hypothesis that persistent infectious triggers of RA disease activity accumulate in the periodontium of people who cannot be successfully treated with multiple anti-rheumatic therapies. We recruited patients with inadequate response to at least two conventional synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) and at least two immune target specific biological DMARDs (bDMARDs). All patients had erosive RA, and high levels of both anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies (CCP) and rheumatoid factor. Eight out of ten screened patients (mean DAS28 5.1 [IQR 4.8, 5.8]) exhibited loss of periodontal clinical attachment level (CAL) ≥5mm at least in two separate sites, fulfilling treatment criteria. Treatment comprised one-stage full mouth disinfection, in conjunction with intensified oral hygiene instruction, plus one week of amoxicillin (500 mg, three times a day for seven days prescribed in seven cases), or alternatively azithromycin (500 mg once daily for three days given in one patient with a history of intolerance to beta-lactam antibiotics), plus metronidazole therapy (500 mg three times daily for seven days in all eight treated patients) (5). At baseline, and three and six months after treatment, periodontal inflammation was monitored by assessing CAL, probing depth and bleeding on probing rates (BOP), along with RA disease activity measured by the disease activity disease index (6) based on 28 joints, microbial colonization in the gingival crevicular fluid, and serum antibody repertoire against specific citrullinated peptides.

Successful periodontal treatment was demonstrated by improved mean CAL (p=0.018), and reduced mean probing depth (p=0.051) and mean BOP (p=0.018) at three months in all treated patients. Five out of eight patients exhibited an improvement in DAS28ESR of at least 0.6 points (DAS28 responders) at 3 months. We considered these individuals to be clinical responders (6). Periodontitis was more severe at baseline, but improved more profoundly upon intervention, in DAS28 responders (Tab. 1). Eleven periodontopathogenic bacterial species were monitored in the subgingival biofilm, using a semiquantitative nucleic-acid based detection method (Micro-IDent®plus11, Hain Lifescience Nehren, Germany). Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans was not detected in any sample at levels above 106 bacteria. In two patients Porphyromas gingivalis was present at baseline at levels higher than 106, and in both subjects levels were reduced 3 months after treatment. However, Porphyromonas gingivalis colonisation at month 6 returned to baseline levels. Of these two patients, one had a clinical response with a change in DAS28ESR from 4.4 at baseline to 3.2 at month 3.. The other of these two patients was a non-DAS28-responder. Prevotella intermedia was present in high amounts at baseline in one patient. Following treatment, Prevotella intermedia DNA levels were reduced only in this patient with maintained DAS28 response over 6 months, characterised by a course in DAS28ESR of 5.0 at baseline to 2.7 at month 3 and 2.3 at month 6, with undetectable bacterial load observed at month 3 and maintained at month 6. Capnocytophaga, a group of periodontopathogenic species linked with rheumatoid factor positivity in the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES-III) cohort without RA (7), was observed significantly more frequently at baseline in patients who went on to show a DAS28 response >0.6 points, compared to non-responders. Colonization by Capnocytophaga species was reduced three months after intervention in three out of the four moderate DAS28 responders; the fourth patient declined dental follow-up examinations. Serum concentrations of anti-citrullinated tenascin-C (cTNC5) antibodies were significantly higher at baseline in patients without a DAS28 response than in DAS28 responders (Tab. 1). However, none of the tested autoantibody titres significantly changed upon periodontal therapy.

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics (non italic) and change in secondary periodontitis outcome parameters from baseline to month 3 (in italics), stratified by DAS28ESR improvement of at least 0.6 points upon periodontitis therapy at month 3. Statistics for binary variables were Fisher’s exact text and for quantitative data Wilcoxon’s rank sum test.

Parameter Unit Non-responder (n=3) Responder (n=5)
Age [years] 62±13 61±10
Female n= 3 3
Body mass index [kg/m2] 27±7 29±5
Disease duration [years] 18±10 10±6
Previous csDMARDs n, median 2 2
Previous bDMARDs n, median 6 5.5
DAS28ESR* Mean ± SD 5.7±0.4 4.8±0.3
Total number of teeth Median [IQR] 20 [8; 21] 14 [8; 16]
Number of pockets > 4mm Median [IQR] 15 [7; 17] 14 [8; 15]
Probing depth mm, median [IQR] 3.1 [2.6; 3.4] 3.9 [3.8; 3.9]
Change in probing depth mm, median [IQR] 1.0 (0.9–1.1) * 1.4 [1.2–1.5], n=4
Clinical Attachment level (CAL)** mm, median [IQR] −3.5 [−5; −2.2] −6.9 [−7; −6.6]
Change in CAL mm, median [IQR] 0.2 [0–1.1] * 1.2 [0.9–1.4], n=4
Bleeding on probing (BOP) Sites in %, median [IQR] 27 [18; 83] 40 [35; 46]
Change in BOP Sites in %, median [IQR] −19 [−48, −7] −32 [−40, −20], n=4
O’Leary plaque index Median [IQR] 34 [16; 52] 80 [0; 91]
A. actinomycetemcomitans N 0 0
Porphyromonas gingivalis N 1 1
Prevotella intermedia N 0 1
Capnocytophaga sp.# N 1 4
Rheumatoid factor IU/ml 420 [63; 777] 157 [137; 561]
CCP antibodies IU/ml 169 [155; 183] 190 [188; 191]
rVim OD, median [IQR] 0 [0; 0.008] 0 [0; 0]
cVim OD, median [IQR] 0.026[0.01; 1.344] 0.078 [0.043; 0.098]
rFib OD, median [IQR] 0 [0; 0.038] 0 [0; 0]
cFib OD, median [IQR] 0.286 [0.001; 0.694] 0.158 [0.109; 0.674]
REP-1 OD, median [IQR] 0.008 [0.003; 0.012] 0.004 [0.001; 0.006]
CEP-1 OD, median [IQR] 0.026 [0.01; 0.349] 0.013 [0.013; 0.452]
rTNC5 OD, median [IQR] 0.061 [0.037; 0.063] 0.038 [0.029; 0.041]
cTNC5** OD, median [IQR] 0.085 [0.074; 0.215] 0.051 [0.037; 0.054]
*

p=0.03,

**

p=0.05,

#

p=0.014.

Abbreviations: IQR: interquartile range, IU: international unit, SD: standard deviation. rVim: antibodies against arginine baring, cVim, antibodies against citrullinated vimentin peptides. rFib and cFib = antibodies against fibrinogen, REP-1 and CEP-1 = antibodies against enolase and rTNC5 and cTNC5 against tenascin-C.

In summary, we identified a substantial proportion of cases with a high degree of periodontitis in this cohort of people with RA who do not respond well to several rounds of treatment with different DMARDs. Besides the known association between periodontitis and RA, this study might also imply negative effects of an intensive programme of immune-modulating RA therapy on oral health. DAS28 response in five out of these eight patients following treatment for their periodontitis appears promising, though clinical responses did not track back to specific periodontopathogens or changes in antibody titres against specific citrullinated epitopes. These data reveal that consideration of the clinical severity of periodontitis, and associated microbial communities, may be important co-factors for the design of future interventional trials.

Key message:

RA patients with treatable periodontitis are highly prevalent among those with multiple resistance to DMARD’s.

Financing statement:

Financial support for this study came from the University Hospital budget for Teaching and Research (Department L&F) and Versus Arthritis. JP is supported by grants from National Science Center, Poland (UMO-2018/30/A/NZ5/00650) and NIH/NIDCR, US (R01 DE 022597).

Footnotes

Disclosures: The authors have no financial interests to disclose, which could create a potential conflict of interest or the appearance of a conflict of interest with regard to the work.

References

  • 1.Engström M, Eriksson K, Lee L, Hermansson M, Johansson A, Nicholas AP, et al. Increased citrullination and expression of peptidylarginine deiminases independently of P. gingivalis and A. actinomycetemcomitans in gingival tissue of patients with periodontitis. J Transl Med. 2018. Dec 31;16(1):214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Schwenzer A, Quirke AM, Marzeda AM, Wong A, Montgomery AB, Sayles HR, et al. Association of Distinct Fine Specificities of Anti-Citrullinated Peptide Antibodies With Elevated Immune Responses to Prevotella intermedia in a Subgroup of Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis and Periodontitis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017/10/31. 2017;69:2303–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Salemi S, Biondo MI, Fiorentino C, Argento G, Paolantonio M, Di Murro C, et al. Could early rheumatoid arthritis resolve after periodontitis treatment only?: case report and review of the literature. Medicine (Baltimore). 2014. Dec;93(27):e195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Monsarrat P, de Grado GF, Constantin A, Willmann C, Nabet C, Sixou M, et al. The effect of periodontal treatment on patients with rheumatoid arthritis: the ESPERA randomised controlled trial. Jt Bone Spine. 2019. Feb 26; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Keestra JAJ, Grosjean I, Coucke W, Quirynen M, Teughels W. Non-surgical periodontal therapy with systemic antibiotics in patients with untreated chronic periodontitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Periodontal Res. 2015. Jun;50(3):294–314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.van Gestel AM, Prevoo ML, van ‘t Hof MA, van Rijswijk MH, van de Putte LB, van Riel PL. Development and validation of the European League Against Rheumatism response criteria for rheumatoid arthritis. Comparison with the preliminary American College of Rheumatology and the World Health Organization/International League Against Rheumatism Criteria. Arthritis Rheum. 1996. Jan;39(1):34–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Goh CE, Kopp J, Papapanou PN, Molitor JA, Demmer RT. Association Between Serum Antibodies to Periodontal Bacteria and Rheumatoid Factor in the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Arthritis Rheumatol (Hoboken, NJ). 2016. Oct;68(10):2384–93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES