Skip to main content
PMC home page
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Apr 27.
Published in final edited form as: J Neurosci. 2010 Oct 27;30(43):14502–14512. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3909-10.2010

Nucleus Accumbens-Derived GDNF is a Retrograde Enhancer of Dopaminergic Tone in the Mesocorticolimbic System

Jun Wang 1, Sebastien Carnicella 1,4, Somayeh Ahmadiantehrani 1,2, Dao-Yao He 1, Segev Barak 1, Viktor Kharazia 1, Sami Ben Hamida 1, Agustin Zapata 3, Toni S Shippenberg 3, Dorit Ron 1,2,4,*
PMCID: PMC2981598  NIHMSID: NIHMS248463  PMID: 20980608

Abstract

Spontaneous firing of ventral tegmental area (VTA) dopamine (DA) neurons provides ambient levels of DA in target areas such as the nucleus accumbens (NAc) and the prefrontal cortex (PFC). Here we report that the glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF), produced in one target region, the NAc, is retrogradely transported by DA neurons to the VTA where the growth factor positively regulate the spontaneous firing activity of both NAc- and PFC-projecting DA neurons in a mechanism that requires the activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway. We further show that the consequence of GDNF-mediated activation of the MAPK signaling cascade in the VTA is an increase in DA overflow in the NAc. Together, these results demonstrate that NA-produced GDNF serves as a retrograde enhancer that upregulates the activity of the mesocorticolimbic DA system.

INTRODUCTION

GDNF was originally identified as a potent survival factor for midbrain DA neurons in culture (Lin et al., 1993). The growth factor was subsequently shown to be critical for the development survival, maintenance, and function of a number of other populations of neurons in the central nervous system, such as hippocampal neurons (Ledda et al., 2007), motor as well as sympathetic and sensory neurons in the peripheral nervous system (Henderson et al., 1994).

GDNF is essential for postnatal development (Granholm et al., 2000), and maintenance of midbrain DA neurons in the adult brain (Pascual et al., 2008), and for the protection of midbrain DA neurons from neurotoxic damage (Tomac et al., 1995a). Because of these properties, the growth factor has been considered as a potential treatment for Parkinson’s disease, which is characterized by the loss of DA neurons in the substantia nigra (SN) (Deierborg et al., 2008). In addition, accumulating evidence suggests that GDNF in the mesolimbic system, consisting of DAergic projections from the midbrain VTA to the NAc, plays a role in addiction (Carnicella and Ron, 2009; Lu et al., 2009).

GDNF mRNA is produced in the striatum (the primary target area of midbrain DA neurons), while the basal level of the growth factor in the midbrain is very low (Pochon et al., 1997; Trupp et al., 1997). However, the GDNF receptor complex, consisting of the GDNF family receptor α1 (GFRα1) and the receptor tyrosine kinase Ret, are highly expressed in the midbrain but not in the striatum (Trupp et al., 1997; Sarabi et al., 2001; Jain et al., 2006). In line with these observations, Tomac et al. reported that GDNF is retrogradely transported by DA neurons to the SN (Tomac et al., 1995b). In the DAergic neurons of the midbrain, ligation of GDNF with GFRα eads to the recruitment and activation of Ret, and to the consequent activation of several signaling cascades including the MAPK and phosphoinositide 3 kinase (PI3K) pathways (Airaksinen and Saarma, 2002).

Yang et al. (2001) previously reported that acute ex vivo treatment of midbrain neurons with recombinant GDNF increases the evoked firing rate of DA neurons. Within the striatum, GDNF mRNA levels are higher in the NAc (the target region of VTA DA neurons) than in the dorsal striatum (the target region of SN DA neurons) (Barroso-Chinea et al., 2005). Therefore, the aim of the present study was to determine whether endogenous GDNF in the NAc is a retrograde factor that regulates the firing activity of DA neurons in the VTA.

METHODS

Animals

Unless otherwise indicated, male Sprague Dawley rats (21–29 days old) were used. Rats were housed under a 12-hr light/dark cycle, with lights on at 7:00 a.m., and food and water available ad libitum. All animal procedures in this report were approved by the Gallo Center Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and were conducted in agreement with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, National Research Council, 1996.

Reagents

Recombinant human GDNF was obtained from R&D System (Minneapolis, MN). TTX, NBQX, MK-801, PD 98059 and LY 294002 were purchased from Tocris (Ballwin, MO). Neuro-DiI was purchased from Biotum (Hayward, CA). Picrotoxin, R(+) Baclofen, 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA), desipramine, and all ingredients of the intracellular and external solutions were obtained from Sigma (St. Louis, MO). The polyclonal p-ERK1/2 antibody used for immunohistochemistry was purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (Beverly, MA). The monoclonal anti-[pThr202/Tyr-204]-p44/42 ERK (p-ERK1/2) was purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (Beverly, MA). The monoclonal anti-TH antibody used for immunohistochemistry was purchased from Sigma, and the polyclonal anti-TH antibody used for post-recording staining was obtained from Chemicon International Inc. (Temecula, CA). Horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc. (Santa Cruz, CA). The secondary antibodies Alexa Fluor 488-labeled donkey anti-rabbit and Alexa Fluor 594-labeled donkey anti-mouse were purchased from Invitrogen (Chicago, IL). Cy5 anti-rabbit secondary antibody, FITC goat anti-rabbit IgG, and Fluorescein (DTAF) Streptavidin were obtained from Jackson ImmunoResearch Lab Inc. (West Grove, PA). The TRIzol reagent was purchased from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA). The oligo(dT) primers and the Reverse Transcription System used for reverse transcription of mRNA into cDNA were obtained from Promega (Madison, WI). Phosphatase inhibitor cocktails I and II were obtained from Sigma (St. Louis, MO). The polyclonal antibodies, anti-Ret, antiphospho-Ret (anti-pRet, Tyr1062) were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc. (Santa Cruz, CA). Protease inhibitor cocktail was purchased from Roche (Indianapolis, IN). The BCA Protein Assay kit was purchased from Pierce Biotechnology Inc. (Philadelphia, PA). The enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) Plus detection kit was purchased from Amersham (Amersham, UK).

Electrophysiology

Slice preparation

Horizontal sections (150 μm) containing the VTA were prepared with a vibratome in an ice-cold cutting solution containing (in mM): 40 NaCl, 143.5 sucrose, 4 KCl, 1.25 NaH2PO4, 26 NaHCO3, 0.5 CaCl2, 7 MgCl2, 10 glucose, 1 sodium ascorbate and 3 sodium pyruvate, saturated with 95% O2 and 5% CO2. Slices were then incubated in the same solution at 32°C for 45 min, and subsequently maintained at room temperature in the external solution containing (in mM): 125 NaCl, 2.5 KCl, 2.5 CaCl2, 1.3 MgCl2, 1.25 NaH2PO4, 25 NaHCO3 and 10 glucose, saturated with 95% O2 and 5% CO2. For recordings in slices from virus- and DiI-injected animals, rats were intracardially perfused with the ice-cold cutting solution prior to sectioning. Slices were incubated at 32°C in the cutting solution for 25 min and then in a solution containing the cutting and the external solution (1:1 in volume) for an additional 25 min at 32°C. Slices were maintained at room temperature in the external solution until use.

Electrophysiological recording

Individual slices were placed in a recording chamber (RC26G, Warner Instruments, Hamden, CT) and viewed with an epifluorescence Olympus microscope (BX50WI). The chamber was superfused with the external solution at a speed of 2 ml/min. The temperature of the chamber solution was controlled at 33–34°C by a dual channel controller (TC-344B, Warner Instruments). DiI-labeled neurons were identified by the red fluorescence of the DiI and patched under the guidance of IR-DIC microscopy. The electrode resistance for all experiments was 4–6 MΩ. The pipette solution contained (in mM): 123 potassium gluconate, 10 HEPES, 0.2 EGTA, 8 NaCl, 2 MgATP, 0.3 NaGTP, and 0.1% biocytin, pH 7.2–7.3, with an osmolarity of 270–280 mOsm. For measuring the spontaneous firing of neurons, cell-attached recordings were conducted in voltage-clamp mode. Data were collected using a MultiClamp 700A amplifier controlled by the pClamp 9 software (Molecular Devices, Union City, CA) Spontaneous spikes were filtered at 2 kHz and digitized at 10 kHz. Neurons with wide spikes and low firing frequencies were selected for data collection. At the end of the cell-attached recording, whole-cell access was obtained for biocytin perfusion into the neuron for later TH staining while simultaneously recording Ih in voltage-clamp mode by a hyperpolarizing step from the holding voltage of −60 mV to −90 mV for 1 sec. We also tested the Ih-mediated “Sag” in current-clamp mode (data not shown). The spike frequency was continuously measured online with Clampex (Molecular Devices, Union City, CA) or afterwards using Clampfit or MiniAnalysis (Synaptosoft, Decatur, GA). For electrophysiological experiments in which GDNF, Adv-shGDNF and their respective controls were used in vivo, the firing rates of neurons were compared in a counterbalanced manner so that the influence of uncontrollable experimental conditions on the neuronal firing were minimized. Specifically, on a single experimental day, the firing rates of VTA neurons were compared between a rat treated with GDNF or Adv-shGDNF, to a rat treated with vehicle or Adv-SCR, respectively. In addition, neurons from rats receiving treatment or control were alternately recorded. For each neuron, the firing rate during a 4-min stable recording was measured. Recordings were performed within 6 hrs after slice preparation and recovery (~ 1 hr).

Measurement of miniature excitatory postsynaptic currents (mEPSCs) and miniature inhibitory postsynaptic currents (mIPSCs)

For recordings of mEPSCs, 100 μM picrotoxin and 1 μM TTX were present in the bath solution. The pipette solution was the same as described above. mEPSCs were recorded for 5 min with neurons clamped at −70 mV. For recordings of mIPSCs, 10 μM NBQX and 1 μM TTX were present in the bath solution. The intracellular solution contains in mM: 125 KCl, 4 NaCl, 10 HEPES, 1 EGTA, 1 MgCl2, 2 Na2ATP, 0.6 Na3 GTP, 2 Na2CrPO4, 10 QX-314. mIPSCs were recorded for 3 min with neurons clamped at −70 mV. mEPSCs and mIPSCs were analyzed with Mini Analysis Program (Synaptosoft, Fort Lee, NJ), with detection criteria set at greater than 7 pA in amplitude, and verified by eye.

Ex vivo application of GDNF

GDNF was dissolved in a bath solution containing 60 μg/ml bovine serum albumin (BSA). After application, the GDNF solution was re-circulated. The re-cycled solution was aspirated by one channel of a dual-channel mini-pump (P720, Instech Lab, Plymouth Meeting, PA) to a 12.5 ml reservoir where it was re-oxygenated with 95% O2 and 5% CO2. The re-oxygenated solution was driven by the other channel of the mini-pump to the recording chamber. A similar re-circulating system was previously used to deliver another neurotrophic factor, brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), into slices for electrophysiological recording (Lauterborn et al., 2007). Post-recording TH immunostaining was performed according to Margolis et al. (2008). Briefly, immediately after electrophysiological recordings, VTA slices containing biocytin-filled neurons were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 2 hrs and stored at 4°C in PBS. Slices were incubated with anti-TH antibody (1:100) at 4°C for 48 hrs, and then agitated overnight at 4°C with Cy5 anti-rabbit secondary antibody (1:100) for TH detection, and FITC-conjugated streptavidin for Biocytin detection. Images were taken with a Zeiss LSM 510 META microscope. The colors of TH and biocytin immunostaining were switched using the Zeiss LSM program so that TH is green, consistent with the color of TH immunostaining in other experiments (Figure 2D, and 4B). TH staining of the VTA from GDNF (Figure 2D) and DiI-injected animals (Figure 4B) was done as described in Carnicella et al. (2008).

Figure 2. Intra-NAc infusion of GDNF causes increased spontaneous firing, altered synaptic drives, and ERK activation in VTA neurons.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

GDNF (10 μg/2μl) and/or vehicle were bilaterally (A–C) or unilaterally (D) infused into the NAc, and VTA slices were prepared 12 hrs later (the time point was chosen based on a previous study (Tomac et al., 1995b)). A, In vivo application of GDNF in the NAc elicits an increase in the firing rate of VTA neurons. Cumulative probability plot comparing spontaneous firing rates of individual neurons in VTA slices from vehicle- (black circles) and GDNF- (red circles) treated rats. ** p < 0.01 vs. vehicle by Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, n = 19 cells from 3 rats for each group. B,C, NAc-derived GDNF increases excitatory but decreases inhibitory synaptic drives to VTA neurons. B, Sample traces of mEPSCs (top) and mIPSCs (bottom) after intra-NAc infusion of vehicle or GDNF. Scale bars: 0.2 sec and 15 pA (mEPSCs); 0.3 sec and 60 pA (mIPSCs). C, Bar graphs summarizing the mean frequencies (top) and amplitudes (bottom) of mEPSCs and mIPSCs. n = 11 (mEPSCs, vehicle), 12 (mEPSCs, GDNF), 15 (mIPSCs, vehicle), and 16 (mIPSCs, GDNF) slices. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 t-test. D, Intra-NAc infusion of GDNF into the NAc leads to ERK1/2 in VTA DA neurons. Images show dual channel immunofluorescence for phospho-ERK1/2 (p-ERK1/2, Red), TH (Green), and overlay (Yellow). Images are representative of results from two rats. Scale bars, 500 μm (Left) and 50 μm (Right). Histological verification of placement of GDNF and vehicle infusions into the NAc is shown in Figure S2.

Figure 4. GDNF increases the firing of the NAc-projecting DA neurons in the VTA.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

The retrograde tracer, Neuro-DiI, was injected bilaterally into the NAc. A, A representative coronal section confirming the injection sites within the NAc. Arrowheads indicate tracer deposit. The double arrowheads indicate the anterior commissure. Scale bar, 1 mm. B, Representative images showing that numerous Neuro-DiI-labeled VTA neurons are also TH-positive. Shown are dual-channel fluorescent images for DiI (Red), TH (Green), and overlay (Yellow). The arrowheads indicate cells labeled with DiI and stained for TH (Right). Scale bars, 500 μm (Left) and 50 μm (Right). C, Representative images showing a DiI-labeled VTA neuron that was selected for electrophysiology. Upper panel, Red fluorescent image. Bottom panel, DIC image. Scale bar, 20 μm. D, A bar graph summarizing the mean increase by GDNF (200 ng/ml) in the firing rate of Neuro-DiI labeled VTA neurons. *p < 0.05. n = 8 cells.

TH immunostaining stated otherwise was done as described in Carnicella et al. (2008).

TUNEL staining

18 days after intra-NAc injection of virus, VTA sections were prepared and permeabilized with 50% ethanol in PBS for 20 min, rinsed in PBS and incubated in TUNEL reaction mixture (In Situ cell detection kit, Roche Applied Science) for 1 hr at 37°C according to the vendor’s protocol, then rinsed and processed for TH immunostaining as described in Carnicella et al. (2008).

In vivo application of GDNF and Adv-shGDNF

Intra-VTA infusions

GDNF was infused into the VTA as described previously (Carnicella et al., 2008). Briefly, GDNF (10 μg in 1 μl PBS) or vehicle (PBS) were bilaterally injected into the VTA (in mm: −4.8 AP, ± 0.75 ML, −7.8 DV) of rats. VTA slices were then prepared for electrophysiological recordings 10 min after the injections.

Intra-NAc infusions

Rats were anesthetized with isoflurane. The tip of the injector (31G, small parts, Miami lakes, FL) was stereotaxically positioned into the NAc. The injector was connected to a Hamilton syringe (10 μl) that was driven by an automatic pump (Harvard Apparatus, Holliston, MA). The injection speed was 0.2 μl/min. Infusions of GDNF (10 μg in 2 μl saline, or 2 μl saline as vehicle) and viruses (Adv-shGDNF or Adv-SCR 0.35 × 1010 TU/ml, 2 μl) into the NAc were made bilaterally, or unilaterally (for detection of ERK1/2 phosphorylation). For dual-site injections, GDNF or vehicle (saline) was infused into the NAc 7–11 days following intra-prefrontal cortex (PFC) injection of DiI (see below). Each side of the NAc received 4 injections, varying the anterior-posterior and dorsal-ventral axes (in mm: +1.7 AP1, +1.1 AP2, ± 1.3 ML, −7.2 DV1, −6.8 DV2) in order to reach a maximal area in the NAc. Twelve hrs after injections, coronal sections of the NAc were prepared for placement verification, coronal sections of the VTA were prepared for immunostaining of phospho-ERK1/2 and TH using a procedure previously described (Carnicella et al., 2008), and horizontal sections of the VTA were used for electrophysiology recordings. For retrograde labeling of NAc projecting VTA neurons, DiI (0.3 μl, in 7% ethanol) was bilaterally injected into the NAc (in mm: +1.5 AP, ± 1.3 ML, −7.2 DV). Seven to 10 days after injection, coronal sections of the NAc were prepared for thionin (0.2%)-staining to verify injection placements, coronal sections of the VTA were prepared for TH-staining to examine the overlay of DiI- and TH-labeled cells, and horizontal sections of VTA were used for electrophysiology recordings.

Intra-PFC injection

DiI (0.3 μl, 7% in ethanol) was bilaterally injected into the medial PFC (in mm: +2.6 AP, ± 0.78 ML, −4.0 DV).

Cloning and preparation of GDNF shRNA recombinant adenovirus

A 20-nucleotide (20nt) GDNF small interfering RNA (siRNA) sequence (siGDNF), ATG TCA CTG ACT TGG GTC TG, was designed using the online siRNA Retriever http://cancan.cshl.edu/RNAi_central/. This siGDNF sequence targets the coding domain of the GDNF mRNA and was used for vector-based small-hairpin RNA (shRNA) expression. Two complementary oligonucleotides were synthesized as follows: 5′-GATCCC (20nt, sense) TTGATATCCG (20nt, antisense), TTTTTT CCAAA-3′ and 3′-GG (20nt antisense) AACTATAGGC (20nt, sense) AAAAAA GGTTTTCGA-5′, flanked by Bam H1 and Hind III residues. The paired oligonucleotides were annealed and ligated into the pRNAT-H1.1/Shuttle (GenScript Corporation, Piscataway, NJ), a GFP-containing adenoviral shuttle siRNA vector. Recombinant sequences were confirmed before subcloning into the adenoviral vector Adeno-X (Clontech, Mountain View, CA). Preparation of adenoviruses was carried out according to the Adeno-X Expression System 1 User Manual (Clontech, Mountain View, CA). The scrambled sequence of siGDNF, GT CTG GGT TCA GTC ACT GTA was designed and prepared in parallel. Viruses were amplified in HEK293 cells, followed by purification using Adeno-X Virus Purification Kit (Clontech, Mountain View, CA) and titered based on GFP-visualized infection. Recombinant viruses were used to infect C6 glioma cells or a stable SHSY5Y cell line that GDNF overexpress (He and Ron, 2006) at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 20, and downregulation of GDNF after infection was measured thereafter (Figure S1A).

Brain sample collection and Quantitative Reverse Transcription – Polymerase Chain Reaction (qRT-PCR)

Eighteen days after viral infusion, brain tissue containing the NAc was dissected. Total RNA was isolated, and reverse transcription of mRNA into cDNA was conducted using the oligo(dT) primers. The reverse transcription reaction was conducted at 42°C for 30 min. The resulting cDNA samples were amplified by TaqMan quantitative PCR using commercially available primer/probe kits from Applied Biosystems for GDNF (Gene Expression Assay Rn00569510_m1) and GAPDH (Gene Expression Assay Rn99999916_s1) as the internal control.

Standard Reverse Transcription – Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR)

Five or 18 days after viral infusion, brain tissue containing the NAc or the VTA was dissected. Total RNA was isolated with TRIzol reagent and used for reverse transcription with the Reverse Transcription System at 42°C for 30 min. PCR was performed with glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) as an internal control as previously described (Carnicella et al., 2009). Thirty-two cycles were performed to measure the expressions of GDNF, TH and NGF. Primers were used as follows: rat GDNF, upstream 5′-GAC GTC ATG GAT TTT ATT CAA GCC ACC 3′ and downstream 5′-CTG GCC TAC TTT GTC ACT TGT TAG CCT-3′; rat TH, upstream 5′-GAA GCT GAT TGC AGA GAT TGC-3′ and downstream 5′-GCT CAG GTG AAT GCA TAG GTG-3′; rat NGF, upstream 5′-ACA CTC TGG ATC TAG ACT TCC AGG-3′ and downstream 5′-AGG CAA GTC AGC CTC TTC TTG TAG-3′

Western blot analysis

Midbrain slices were prepared as above. After recovery for at least 1 hr, midbrain slices (150 μm) containing the VTA were dissected. To detect phosphorylation level of Ret, slices were treated with GDNF (400 ng/ml) for 45 min at room temperature in aCSF. To detect the level of phospho-ERK1/2, slices were pretreated with tetrodotoxin (TTX, 1 μM) and MK 801 (20 μM) for 30 min to block activity- and NMDAR-dependent changes in the level of phospho-ERK1/2. Slices were then incubated with GDNF (400 ng/ml) for 45 min in the continuous presence of TTX and MK 801. At the end of the treatment period, the slices were quickly sonicated in RIPA buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 5 mM EDTA, 10 mM NaCl, 1% NP-40, 0.1% deoxycholate, and 0.5% SDS) containing protease and phosphatase inhibitors. Following a 30-min incubation of the lysate on ice, 25μg of protein was resolved in NuPAGE 4–12% Bis-Tris gels (Invitrogen). Anti- phospho-Ret and antiphospho-ERK1/2 antibodies (1:2000) were used to detect the phosphorylation levels of Ret and ERK1/2. ECL reaction was used for detection of signal, which was digitally scanned using a STORM detector. Following detection, membranes were incubated in stripping buffer (25 mM glycine-HCl, 1% SDS, pH 3, for 30 min at room temperature) and re-probed with anti-Ret or anti-ERK2 antibodies (1:1000 for Ret, 1:2000 for ERK2). Densitometric analysis was performed using Image J software (NIH).

Intra-NAc infusion of 6-OHDA

Thirty min before 6-OHDA infusions, rats were administered with desipramine (15 mg/kg, i.p.) to prevent the uptake of 6-OHDA into noradrenergic nerve endings. 6- OHDA was dissolved in saline (8 μg/μl) and ascorbate (0.1 μg/μl). 6-OHDA (1.5 μl) was bilaterally (for electrophysiological recordings) or unilaterally (for immunohistochemical studies) infused into the NAc (see above for coordinates). For electrophysiology experiments, DiI was infused into the PFC (see above for coordinates) to label PFC- projecting VTA neurons. Three weeks later, GDNF (10 μg/2 μl) or vehicle was bilaterally infused to the NAc. Twelve hrs after GDNF/vehicle infusion, animals were anesthetized and brains removed for electrophysiological recordings or immunohistochemical studies.

In vivo microdialysis

Surgery

Adult male Long-Evans rats (Harlan, 350–400 g) were anesthetized with isoflurane (Baxter Health Care Corporation) or equithesin (1% pentobarbital, 2% magnesium sulfate, 4% chloral hydrate, 42% propyleneglycol, 11% ethanol, 3 ml/kg intraperitoneally). Unilateral guide cannulae for microinjection (26G, Plastics One) were placed dorsal to the VTA (in mm: −5.6 AP, ±0.8 ML, −7.4 DV, relative to the bregma) and guide cannulae for the microdialysis probes (CMA/11, CMA microdialysis) were placed dorsal to the NAc (in mm: +1.7 AP, +1.0 ML, −6.4 DV, relative to the bregma). After the surgery, animals were allowed to recover for 2–4 days.

Microinjection and microdialysis procedure

Microdialysis was performed as previously described (Zapata and Shippenberg, 2005). In the evening before the experiment, probes (2 mm membrane length) were inserted into guide cannulae and connected to the dialysis system. Rats were housed in the microdialysis chamber with food and water, and the probes were perfused overnight (0.3 μ/min) and 1 hr before experiments (1 μl/min) with artificial cerebrospinal fluid (aCSF) (in mM: 145 NaCl, 2.8 KCl, 1.2 MgCl2, 1.2 CaCl2, 0.25 ascorbic acid and 5.4 D-glucose, pH 6.5–7.0 adjusted with NaOH). Fresh aCSF was loaded and probes equilibrated over 1 hr at a flow rate of 0.6 μl/min prior to the beginning of the sample collection. GDNF (10 μg/μl) or PBS and/or U0126 (0.5 μg/μl) or its vehicle (5% DMSO and 6% Tween 80 in PBS) was infused over 2 min into the VTA via injection cannulae (33G, Plastics One) extending 1.0 mm beyond the guide cannula tip. To confirm the functional connectivity between the VTA infusion site and the NAc dialysate collection site, 2.5 hrs later, the GABAB receptor agonist baclofen (75 ng/μl) was infused into the VTA to inactivate DA neurons. Connectivity is verified by the resulting decrease in NAc DA concentrations. Rats showing no decrease in NAc DA levels after the infusion of baclofen were excluded from the analyses. Dialysis fractions were collected every 15 min, frozen at −80°C, and analyzed for DA content within 48 hrs using HPLC electrochemical detection.

DA level determination

DA levels in the dialysate samples of the first microdialysis experiment (effect of intra-VTA infusion of GDNF on NAc DA overflow, Figure 7A) were determined as described in (Zapata and Shippenberg, 2005). The chromatographic system used to determine the DA levels in the dialysate samples of the second microdialysis experiment (including the intra-VTA infusion of the MEK inhibitor U0126, Figure 7B) consisted of an ESA Model 584 pump and ESA microtiter Model 540 (ESA, Analytical, Chelmsford, MA), an ESA Coulochem III amperometric detector with a Model 5011A dual-detector analytical cell (guard cell = 275 mV, E1 = −150 mV, E2 = 220 mV), and a microbore column (50 mm × 1.5 mm × 3 μm; Shizeido Co., Tokyo, Japan). The mobile phase (150 mM NaH2PO4, 4.76 mM citric acid, 50 μM EDTA, 3 mM SDS, 8% methanol, 10% acetonitrile; pH 5.6 adjusted with NaOH) was run at a flow rate of 0.2 ml/min. DA was quantified by comparing DA peaks from dialysate samples with external standards. Under these conditions, the retention time for DA was 3 min and the limit of detection was below 0.3 nM (at a signal to noise ratio of 3:1).

Figure 7. Application of GDNF into the VTA causes a rapid and sustained elevation of DA overflow in the NAc that is block by inhibition of the MAPK pathway.

Figure 7

Open in a new tab

A, Left, Time course of dialysate concentrations of DA from the NAc before and after intra-VTA infusion of 10 μg/μl/side (black circles) or vehicle (Veh, white circles). Two- way ANOVA (Treatment × Fractions) shows a significant effect of Treatment (F(1, 156) = 9.40, p < 0.01) and Fraction (F(13, 159) = 4.88, p < 0.001), and a significant interaction between both factors (F(13, 159) = 2.75, p < 0.01). Post-hoc analysis using the method of contrasts shows a significant difference between the vehicle and the GDNF conditions from fractions 5 to 14 (Ts > 1.81, ps < 0.05). The basal concentration of DA in dialysate was 1.97 ± 0.53 and 2.14 ± 0.42 nM for the Veh and GDNF group, respectively. Right, Bar graph comparing the DA levels in the NAc following GDNF or vehicle injections into the VTA. The values were averaged from fractions 5 to 8. n = 8 (Veh), n = 6 (GDNF). B, Left, The MEK inhibitor U0126 (0.5 μg/μl/side) or vehicle were infused in the VTA 1 hr before the application of GDNF (10 μg/μl/side) or vehicle. Time course of dialysate concentrations of DA from the NAc before and after intra-VTA infusion of, GDNF (black circles) or GDNF/U0126 (white circles). Two-way ANOVA (Treatment × Fractions) shows a significant effect of Treatment (F(1, 156) = 8.35, p < 0.01) and Fraction (F(13, 159) = 4.03, p < 0.001), and no interaction between both factors (F(13, 159) = 1.86, p = 0.12). Post-hoc analysis using the method of contrasts shows a significant difference between the Veh/GDNF and the U0126/GDNF conditions from fractions 11, 12, 15 and 17 (ts > 1.68, ps < 0.05). The basal concentration of DA in dialysate was 0.75 ± 0.18 and 1.13 ± 0.15 nM for the Veh/GDNF and U0126/GDNF group, respectively. Right, Bar graph comparing the DA levels in the NAc following vehicle, U0126 or GDNF injections into the VTA. The values were averaged from fractions 5 to 8 for the vehicle and U0126 injections and 9 to 12 for the GDNF injections. n = 6 (Veh/GDNF), n = 8 (U0129/GDNF). A&B, Intra-VTA infusion of 75 ng of baclofen confirmed the functional connection between the VTA and NAc placements by reducing NAc DA overflow in the four groups. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.

Histology

Locations of cannulae and microdialysis probe placements were verified in 30 μm-thick coronal slices after cryostat sectioning and subjects with misplaced injectors or probes were excluded from the analyses.

Statistical analysis

All values are expressed as mean ± SEM unless otherwise stated. Statistical significance of electrophysiological and biochemical data was analyzed by paired or unpaired Student’s t-test unless otherwise stated. The microdialysis data were analyzed by a two-way ANOVA (mixed within-subject design). Significant interaction was further investigated by using the method of contrasts or the Student-Newman-Keuls test.

RESULTS

Down regulation of GDNF expression in the NAc decreases spontaneous but not evoked firing frequency of VTA neurons

First, we tested whether endogenous GDNF in the NAc regulates the evoked firing activity of VTA DA neurons. To do so, we used viral-mediated gene delivery to downregulate the expression level of GDNF in the NAc, and examined the consequence of GDNF knock-down on the level of evoked firing activity of DA neurons in the VTA. An adenovirus expressing small hairpin RNA (shRNA) against GDNF mRNA (Adv-shGDNF) (Figure S1A) was stereotaxically and bilaterally infused into the NAc of rats (Figure 1Aa). Intra-NAc administration of Adv-shGDNF led to infection of medium spiny neurons (Figure 1Ab-1Ad), which are the principal neurons of the NAc that produce GDNF (Oo et al., 2005). Infection of neurons with Adv-shGDNF produced a ~50% reduction in GDNF mRNA levels in the NAc 18 days after infusion of the virus (Figures 1B and S1B). The knockdown of GDNF expression was time-dependent (Figure S1B) and specific, as the mRNA level of another growth factor, nerve growth factor (NGF), was unaltered (Figure S1B).

Figure 1. Viral-mediated downregulation of GDNF mRNA in the NAc does not alter evoked firing, but leads to a decrease in spontaneous firing rate of VTA neurons.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Recombinant adeno-virus containing GDNF shRNA (Adv-shGDNF) or scrambled RNA (Adv-SCR) were bilaterally infused into the NAc of rats. A, Viral infection in the NAc was confirmed by GFP fluorescence 18 days post-injection (D18). The white boxes in a and b indicate the position of the medium spiny neuron shown in b and the position of the spiny dendrite shown in c–d (c and d are the same dendrite in color (c) and black and white (d), respectively). Scale bar, 2 mm (a), 50 μm (b), and 10 μm (c). B, Adv-shGDNF decreases GDNF expression in the NAc. The NAc tissue from Adv-shGDNF and Adv-SCR infected rats was dissected at D18 for RT-PCR analysis of mRNA levels of GDNF. Bar graph depicts the average GDNF/GAPDH ratio. * p < 0.05. n = 5 rats for each group. C, Downregulation of GDNF in the NAc does not alter the frequency of VTA neuronal firing evoked by somatic current injections. Cell membrane potentials were brought to −60 mV in whole-cell current-clamp mode, and a depolarization step of 120 pA (0.5 sec) was injected to induce evoked firing. Left, Sample voltage traces response to the current injection in slices from Adv-SCR- (SCR, top) and Adv-shGDNF- (shGDNF, bottom) treated rats. Scale, 30 mV, 100 ms. Middle and Right, bar graphs depicting no difference in firing rate (Middle) and latency (Right) of evoked VTA neuronal firing between Adv-SCR- and Adv-shGDNF-treated rats. The frequency was measured between the first 2 spikes. n = 35 (SCR) and 34 (shGDNF) neurons from 13 rats for each group. The latency was defined as the duration between the onset of current injection to the peak of the first spike. n = 36 (SCR) and 35 (shGDNF) neurons from 13 rats for each group. D, Downregulation of GDNF in the NAc decreases the spontaneous firing rate of VTA neurons. Left, Representative traces of spontaneous firing of VTA neurons in Adv-SCR-(SCR, top) and Adv-shGDNF- (shGDNF, bottom) infected rats. Note that the inter-spike interval is larger (thus the frequency is lower) in the bottom trace than in the top trace. Right, Cumulative probability plot comparing individual neurons in slices from Adv-shGDNF- and Adv-SCR-treated rats. * p < 0.05 by Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, n = 33 neurons from 9 rats for each group. See also Figure S1.

Next, we determined whether the downregulation of GDNF expression in the NAc alters the evoked firing of neurons in the VTA, 18 days post-viral infusion. To do so, we used whole-cell current-clamp recordings, in which a depolarizing step current of 120 pA was injected to induce firing with the first-two-spike frequency of 10 Hz (Figure 1C left) as previously described (Yang et al., 2001). No differences in firing frequency (Figure 1C middle) or latency to the first spike (Figure 1C right) were observed between neurons from rats infected with Adv-shGDNF and rats infected with a control adenovirus expressing the scrambled shRNA GDNF sequence (Adv-SCR). These results suggest that endogenous GDNF in the NAc does not regulate the evoked firing of VTA neurons.

DA neurons also exhibit spontaneous tonic firing (Grace and Bunney, 1984). Therefore, using cell-attached recordings (Figure 1D left), we compared the spontaneous firing rate of VTA neurons from Adv-SCR and Adv-shGDNF-infected rats. Interestingly, we observed that the spontaneous firing rate of VTA neurons was markedly decreased in the Adv-shGDNF-treated rats compared to those treated with Adv-SCR (Figure 1D, shGDNF 2.74 ± 0.21 Hz, and SCR, 3.57 ± 0.26 Hz, p< 0.05, t test).

Pascual et al. recently reported that conditional knockout of GDNF in adult mice leads to a loss of TH mRNA and to a decrease in the number of DA neurons in the VTA 3 and 7 months after the onset of the knockout, respectively (Pascual et al., 2008). We therefore tested whether knockdown of GDNF in the NAc resulted in cell death of VTA DA neurons. We found that the short-term (18 days), 50% reduction in GDNF level in the NAc did not produce a change in the mRNA level of TH in the VTA (Figure S1C), or in the number of TH immunoreactive neurons (Figure S1D), and no significant neuronal cell death was detected in the VTA as measured by TUNEL staining (Figure S1D). These results indicate that attenuation of spontaneous firing rate of VTA neurons by downregulation of NAc GDNF levels is unlikely to be attributed to cell death of VTA DA neurons. Taken together, these results suggest that NAc-produced endogenous GDNF is required for maintaining the normal spontaneous firing activity of VTA neurons.

Intra-NAc application of GDNF activates the MAPK pathway and increases neuronal firing in the VTA

If GDNF, produced in the NAc, is transported to the VTA to regulate the spontaneous firing rate of DA neurons, then infusion of recombinant GDNF into the NAc of rats should increase the spontaneous firing activity of VTA neurons. To test this possibility, we bilaterally infused GDNF or vehicle into the NAc of rats and measured the spontaneous activity of VTA neurons in slices prepared 12 hrs post-injection. We found that the spontaneous firing rate of VTA neurons was higher in rats that received intra-NAc infusion of GDNF than in rats that were infused with vehicle (Figure 2A, GDNF, 4.84 ± 0.28 Hz, and vehicle, 3.16 ± 0.28 Hz, p < 0.01 t test).

Unlike the evoked firing activity which is determined primarily by the intrinsic excitability of neurons (Yang et al., 2001; Hahn et al., 2003), the spontaneous firing activity is controlled by both the intrinsic excitability ( Liss et al., 2001; Khaliq and Bean, 2010), and the extrinsic synaptic drive (Johnson et al., 1992). To test whether the distinct effect of NAc-derived GDNF on the spontaneous, but not on the evoked, firing rates results from changes in synaptic drive, we measured the level of mEPSCs and mIPSCs of VTA neurons 12 hrs after intra-NAc infusion of GDNF. We found that GDNF treatment causes a small but significant increase in the amplitude, but not in the frequency of mEPSCs (Figure 2B&C). In addition, we observed that GDNF application leads to decreases in both the amplitude and the frequency of mIPSCs (Figure 2B&C). These results suggest that NAc-derived GDNF regulates the extrinsic synaptic drive, i.e., increases the excitatory, but decreases the inhibitory synaptic strength to the neurons, leading to increased spontaneous firing rate of neurons.

GDNF receptors GFRα and RET are highly expressed in the VTA (Trupp et al., 1997). Upon receptor ligation, GDNF activates several signaling cascades including the MAPK, Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2)-mediated pathway (Airaksinen and Saarma, 2002). Therefore, we tested whether intra-NAc infusion of GDNF also leads to the activation of the ERK1/2 in the VTA. GDNF was infused into the NAc of one hemisphere and vehicle was injected into the other hemisphere (Figure S2), and the activation of ERK1/2 was assessed by measuring the phosphorylation level of the enzyme in VTA slices, 12 hrs after infusion. We found that the level of phospho-ERK1/2 in DA neurons was significantly higher in the side ipsilateral to the intra-NAc infusion of GDNF as compared to that of the vehicle infusion (Figure 2D). Together, these results suggest that NAc-derived GDNF activates the MAPK pathway and increases the spontaneous firing rate of VTA DA neurons.

GDNF enhancement of VTA neuronal firing requires the activation of the MAPK pathway

If GDNF in the NAc is transported to the VTA to regulate the spontaneous firing of VTA neurons via ERK1/2, then the activation of the GDNF pathway directly in the VTA should produce the same response. First, we tested whether intra-VTA infusion of GDNF in vivo alters the spontaneous firing activity of VTA neurons. To do so, GDNF or vehicle was infused bilaterally into the VTA of rats, slices were prepared 10 min post-infusion, and the spontaneous firing activity of neurons was measured after slice recovery. As shown in Figure 3A, intra-VTA application of GDNF produced an increase in the spontaneous firing frequency of VTA neurons.

Figure 3. GDNF in the VTA increases the spontaneous firing rate of DA neurons in a MAPK-dependent manner.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

A, Intra-VTA infusion of GDNF produces an increase in the spontaneous firing rate of VTA neurons. GDNF (10 μg/μl) or vehicle was bilaterally infused into the VTA, and slices were prepared 10 min later. Cumulative probability plot was constructed to compare the firing rates of individual neurons in slices from vehicle- and GDNF-treated rats. ** p < 0.01 vs. vehicle by Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, n = 12 cells from 3 rats for each group. B–D, Bath-applied GDNF increases the spontaneous firing frequency of DA neurons. B, Sample traces of spontaneous firing in a tight-seal cell-attached recording before (Baseline) and during (14 min) bath application of GDNF (200 ng/ml). Scale bar, 0.5 sec. C, Averaged time course showing that bath application of GDNF (200 ng/ml, black circles) (n = 14), but not its heat-inactivated form (heat-inact, GDNF, 200 ng/ml, white circles) (n = 8), induced an increase in the firing frequency of neurons. The horizontal bar depicts the application duration of GDNF or its inactivated form. For inactivation, GDNF was heated at 95°C for 1 hr. D, Dose-response of GDNF-induced enhancement of firing rate. * p < 0.05 vs. baseline. n = 10, 8, 15 for 50, 100, and 200 ng/ml GDNF, respectively. E–F, GDNF enhancement of the spontaneous firing rate of VTA neurons requires the activation of the MAPK pathway, but not the PI-3K pathway. Slices were pretreated with PD 98059 (10 μM), or LY 294002 (25 μM), for 45 min and GDNF’s (200 ng/ml) effect on the firing rate was tested in the continuous presence of the inhibitors. E, Firing rate of neurons in the presence of PD 98059 before and during GDNF application. F, Bar graph summarizing the effect of PD 98059 and LY 294002 on the firing rate of neurons in response to GDNF. * p < 0.05 vs. baseline. n = 9 (PD 98059), n = 11 (LY 294002). p = 0.15 for the difference in firing rate before and during GDNF application in the continuous presence of PD 98059. See also Figure S3.

Next, we tested whether the activation of the MAPK pathway is required for GDNF-mediated increase in spontaneous activity of VTA neurons. As shown in Figure 3B–D, bath application of GDNF, but not heat-inactivated GDNF, induced a dose-dependent and rapid increase in the spontaneous firing rate of VTA neurons that exhibited large hyperpolarization-activated cation currents (Ih) (Figure S3A), and were tyrosine hydroxylase (TH)-positive (Figure S3B), but did not alter the activity (Figure S3C) of neurons that were small (Figure S3D), and TH negative (Figure S3E). Next, we confirmed that application of GDNF leads to the activation of the Ret receptor, and to the activation of ERK1/2 in midbrain slices (Figure S3F,G). Finally, we determined the contribution of ERK1/2 to the GDNF-mediated increase in spontaneous firing rate of VTA DA neurons, by measuring the effects on GDNF on the spontaneous firing rate of neurons in the presence of PD 98059, a specific inhibitor of the MAPK/ERK kinase (MEK) that phosphorylates and activates ERK1/2. PD 98059 did not alter the activity of VTA neurons (Figure S3H), and GDNF failed to induce an increase in the firing rate of VTA DA neurons in slices pre-treated with the inhibitor (Figure 3E,F). In contrast, blockade of the PI3K pathway with the specific inhibitor LY 294002, did not alter the GDNF-mediated increase in the level of spontaneous firing of VTA DA neurons (Figure 3F). Together, these results suggest that GDNF in the VTA increases the spontaneous firing rate of VTA DA neurons via the activation of the MAPK pathway.

GDNF increases the spontaneous firing rate of NAc- and PFC-projecting VTA DA neurons

The VTA contains neurons that project to the NAc, a brain region that produces GDNF. We therefore examined whether GDNF alters the spontaneous firing rate of VTA neurons that project to the NAc. To do so, we injected the retrograde tracer, Neuro-DiI, into the NAc (Figure 4A); the tracer was retrogradely transported to the cell bodies in the VTA (Figure 4B). As shown in Figure 4B, most of the DiI-labeled neurons are TH-positive, i.e., DA neurons. We then tested the effect of GDNF on the firing of DiI-labeled NAc-projecting neurons (Figure 4C) in VTA slices, and found that bath application of GDNF induced an increase in the spontaneous firing frequency of VTA neurons projecting to the NAc (Figure 4D). These results suggest that GDNF increases the spontaneous firing rate of NAc-projecting DA neurons.

In addition to projecting to the NAc, VTA DA neurons also project to the PFC (Swanson, 1982). Although individual VTA DA neurons do not project to both the NAc and the PFC (Swanson, 1982), NAc- and PFC-projecting VTA neurons are located in close proximity to one another (Lammel et al., 2008; Margolis et al., 2008). We were interested in examining whether intra-NAc application of GDNF alters the spontaneous firing activity of PFC-projecting neurons in VTA slices. Specifically, we tested whether NAc-applied GDNF, which after transport is released in the VTA, can diffuse and bind to its receptors on the neighboring VTA neurons that project to the PFC, leading to alterations in firing activity of the PFC-projecting neurons. To address this possibility, we first bilaterally injected DiI into the PFC of rats to label PFC-projecting VTA neurons (Figure 5A). Next, GDNF or vehicle was infused into the NAc 7–11 days post-DiI injection, VTA slices were prepared 12 hrs later, and the level of the spontaneous firing of PFC-projecting VTA neurons was measured. As shown in Figure 5B, the spontaneous firing frequency of PFC-projecting neurons was higher in GDNF-treated rats than in those treated with vehicle (GDNF, 3.83 ± 0.27 Hz, vehicle, 2.69 ± 0.20 Hz, p < 0.01, t test). These results suggest that NAc-produced GDNF is transported to the VTA where the growth factor acts to increase the spontaneous firing activity of both NAc- and PFC- projecting VTA neurons.

Figure 5. Intra-NAc infusion of GDNF leads to an increase in spontaneous firing rate of PFC-projecting VTA neurons.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

A–B, GDNF (10 μg/ 2μl) was bilaterally infused into the NAc 7-11 days following intra- PFC infusions of DiI. VTA slices were prepared 12 hrs after GDNF infusion, and the spontaneous firing of DiI-labled PFC-projecting neurons was measured. A, A representative coronal section confirming the injection sites within the PFC. Arrowheads indicate DiI deposit. Scale bar, 0.5 mm B, Cumulative probability plot comparing spontaneous firing rates of individual neurons in slices from vehicle- (black circles) and GDNF- (red circles) treated rats. ** p < 0.01 vs. vehicle by Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, n = 22 cells from 5 rats for each group.

Retrograde transport is required for NAc-derived GDNF to enhance the spontaneous firing rate of mesocortical DA neurons

It is possible that GDNF is transported from the NAc to the VTA either retrogradely by the NAc-projecting DA neurons and/or anterogradely by the medium spiny neurons, some of which were found to project to the VTA (Lu et al., 1998). To determine whether the retrograde transport of GDNF is required for NAc GDNF-mediated enhancement of firing activity of VTA neurons, we infused 6-OHDA into the NAc to selectively lesion NAc-projecting DA neurons (Joyce et al., 1983) and examined whether subsequent intra-NAc infusion of GDNF still induces an increase in the firing activity of VTA PFC-projecting neurons. We found that 6-OHDA application leads to a significant reduction of TH-positive fibers in the NAc (Figure 6A). Importantly, upon infusion of GDNF into the NAc, we observed a robust reduction in both the activation of ERK1/2 (Figure 6B), and in the spontaneous firing rate of VTA PFC-projecting neurons (Figure 6C, vehicle, 3.17 ± 0.19 Hz and GDNF, 3.38 ± 0.20 Hz, p > 0.05 t test). Together, these results support the notion that the retrograde transport of GDNF is required for NAc-derived GDNF to enhance the firing activity of VTA neurons.

Figure 6. 6-OHDA-mediated lesions of DAergic fibers in the NAc attenuates NAc GDNF-induced activation of VTA ERK1/2 and enhancement of the spontaneous firing rate of PFC-projecting VTA neurons.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

6-OHDA was unilaterally (A–B) or bilaterally (C) infused into the NAc. For electrophysiology experiments (C), DiI was also bilaterally infused into the PFC. Three weeks after the infusion of 6-OHDA, vehicle (A) or GDNF (10 μg/2 μl) (B,C) was bilaterally infused into the NAc. Twelve hrs after GDNF infusion, animals were perfused and brains removed to examine the immunoreactivity of TH (A) and phosphorylated ERK1/2 (p-ERK1/2) (B). The spontaneous firing of DiI-labeled PFC-projecting VTA neurons was measured in parallel (C). A, Image depicts TH staining in the whole striatum after 6-OHDA (left) and vehicle (right) infusion into the NAc. The reduction of TH level in the area defined by the dash line, contains the most part of the NAc. Scale bar, 1 mm. B, Intra-NAc infusion of 6-OHDA reduces subsequent GDNF-mediated increase in p-ERK1/2 levels in the VTA. Image shows ERK1/2 phosphorylation in the VTA after unilateral 6-OHDA (left) and subsequent bilateral GDNF infusions into the NAc. Scale bar, 500 μm. C, 6-OHDA lesion of DAergic fibers in the NAc abolishes NAc-derived GDNF enhancement of the spontaneous firing rate of PFC-projecting VTA neurons. Cumulative probability plot comparing the firing rate of neurons from GDNF (red) and vehicle (black)-infused animals. n = 39 (vehicle) and 42 (GDNF). p > 0.05 Kolmogorov-Smirnov test.

Infusion of GDNF in the VTA increases DA release in the NAc via the activation of the MAPK pathway

Finally, we set out to determine a consequence of the GDNF-mediated enhancement of the spontaneous firing frequency of VTA DA neurons. Spontaneous firing activity of DA neurons in the midbrain leads to tonic release of DA in the target regions (Keefe et al., 1993). We therefore tested whether the rapid GDNF-mediated enhancement of firing activity of DA neurons would cause a rapid increase in DA levels in the NAc using microdialysis in freely moving rats. Since the microdialysis experiment was done in adult rats and the above electrophysiology experiments in young rats, we first confirmed that GDNF also increases the spontaneous firing rate in VTA slices from adult rats that were the same age as those used in microdialysis (Figure S4). Next, we measured DA overflow in the NAc before and after intra-VTA infusion of GDNF. We found that DA overflow in the NAc was increased shortly after infusion of the growth factor into the VTA (Figure 7). Subsequent infusion of the GABAB receptor agonist baclofen decreased DA levels in both vehicle- and GDNF-infused rats (Figure 7 left panel), confirming the functional connectivity between the VTA infusion site and the NAc dialysate collection site. Importantly, GDNF failed to elevate DA outflow in the NAc after infusion of the MEK inhibitor U0126 into the VTA (Figure 7B), suggesting that GDNF in the VTA increases the NAc DA release in a MAPK-dependent manner.

DISCUSSION

In this study we show that downregulation of GDNF expression in the NAc by RNA interference significantly reduces spontaneous firing activity of VTA DA neurons. We observed that infusion of recombinant GDNF into the NAc mimics the actions of endogenous GDNF by increasing the spontaneous firing activity of VTA neurons. In addition, we show that the spontaneous firing activity of PFC-projecting VTA neurons is increased by intra-NAc application of GDNF, and report that GDNF in the VTA produces a rapid increase in DA release in the NAc. Finally, we present data to suggest that the increase in the spontaneous firing rate of VTA DA neurons, and the increase in DA overflow in the NAc depend on the activation of ERK1/2. Based on these results, we propose the following model: GDNF produced in the target region, (the NAc), (Figure 8A) is retrogradely transported to its site of action, (the VTA), (Figure 8B–C) where the growth factor activates the GDNF receptor Ret (Figure 8D–E) leading to the consequent activation of the MAPK signaling cascade (Figure 8F), which, in turn, leads to a rapid enhancement of the spontaneous firing rate of both NAc- and PFC-projecting DA neurons in the VTA (Figure 8G–H). We further provide evidence that the GDNF-mediated increases in the spontaneous activity of NAc-projecting VTA neurons results in an elevation of DA levels in the NAc (the target region) (Figure 8I). Together, our results suggest that GDNF is a long-distance retrograde enhancer of the mesocorticolimbic DAergic system.

Figure 8. A model for GDNF production, transportation, and regulation of VTA neuronal activity.

Figure 8

Open in a new tab

A VTA DA neuron (yellow) innervates a medium spiny neuron (MSN, Green), the principal cell of the NAc. A neighboring VTA DA neuron (orange) projects to the PFC (grey). GDNF (red triangle) is synthesized in and released by the MSN (A). The polypeptide is taken up by the terminal of the NAc-projecting VTA DA neuron (B). GDNF is then retrogradely transported into the neuronal soma and/or dendrite located in the VTA, where GDNF is secreted (C). The released GDNF binds to GFRα-1 (white) localized on the membrane of the same and/or adjacent NAc-projecting (D) and PFC-projecting (E) VTA neuron, which leads to the ligation of the GDNF/GFRα-1 complex to Ret (green), leading to its activation (D and E). Activation of Ret results in the activation of ERK1/2 (blue, F), that in turn causes increased spontaneous neuronal firing (G and H), which propagates along the axon back to the DA terminal in the NAc, leading to the elevation of DA (black) release (I).

GDNF in the NAc enhances the spontaneous firing rate of VTA neurons

Spontaneous firing activity of neurons is controlled by both the intrinsic excitability (e.g., Liss et al., 2001; Khaliq and Bean, 2010), and the extrinsic synaptic drive to neurons (Johnson et al., 1992), whereas the evoked firing is determined primarily by the intrinsic excitability (Yang et al., 2001; Hahn et al., 2003). We observed that downregulation of GDNF in the NAc results in a decrease in the spontaneous, but not the evoked firing of VTA neurons. Conversely, we found that intra-NAc application of GDNF lead to an increase in the spontaneous firing activity of VTA neurons. We further showed that intra-NAc application of GDNF resulted in an increase in mEPSC amplitude but a decrease in mIPSC frequency and amplitude of VTA neurons. These results suggest that GDNF regulates the extrinsic synaptic strength of VTA neurons. These findings may provide an explanation to the observation that alteration in evoked firing of VTA neurons was not observed after downregulation of the endogenous growth factor in the NAc. Although our data imply that GDNF in the mesolimbic system does not influence evoked firing, we cannot exclude the possibility that GDNF modulates both the spontaneous and evoked firing activity by two fundamentally different mechanisms, which depend on the activity state of the mesolimbic system.

We also show that intra-VTA infusion of GDNF causes a rapid increase in the spontaneous firing rate of neurons in the VTA and DA release in the NAc and therefore it is highly likely that this rapid action of GDNF is localized within the VTA. However, it is possible that NAc-produced GDNF exhibit other roles in addition to potentiation of the spontaneous firing rate of VTA DA neurons. For example, GDNF was reported to increase the phosphorylation of TH in primary cultures of rat midbrain neurons (Kobori et al., 2004), which may contribute to the prolonged upregulation of DA transmission.

GDNF regulates synaptic activity via a long-distance retrograde transport mechanism

Recent studies suggest that synaptic transmission is bidirectional: e.g., in addition to pre- to post-synaptic neurotransmission, postsynaptic cells release molecules that retrogradely regulate presynaptic neuronal activity (Regehr et al., 2009). For example, endocannabinoids are produced in postsynaptic neurons and diffuse to the presynaptic terminals, where they act locally to reduce GABA release. In addition, the postsynaptic secreted BDNF was shown to act on presynaptic TrkB receptors, which, in turn, increases presynaptic glutamate release (Zhang and Poo, 2002; Magby et al., 2006). Our results suggest that GDNF is retrogradely transported from the soma and/or dendrites of neurons in the target region (the NAc) to the cell bodies of neurons in the VTA to regulate neuronal activity and neurotransmitter release. GDNF’s localization and action fit with some of the criteria for a retrograde modulator of neuronal activity (Regehr et al., 2009). GDNF is mainly synthesized and released in the postsynaptic neurons, the medium spiny neurons (MSNs) in the NAc (Oo et al., 2005) but not in the VTA (Trupp et al., 1997). In addition, GDNF was reported to be retrogradely transported from the striatum to the SN (Tomac et al., 1995b). Furthermore, we found that GDNF alters the activity of VTA DA neurons that project to both the NAc and the PFC. In support of the retrograde actions of GDNF we show that 6-OHDA lesion of NAc-projecting DAergic fibers abolish the NAc-derived GDNF-induced enhancement of PFC-projecting neurons, suggesting that the retrograde transport of the growth factor by the mesolimbic DA neurons is required for the enhancement of firing activity of VTA neurons. Individual VTA DA neurons do not project to more than one target area (Swanson, 1982). Therefore, our results suggest that NAc-derived GDNF is released in the VTA in order to act on the GDNF receptors on the surface of VTA PFC-projecting neurons (Figure 8). Indeed, the close proximity of the NAc- and PFC-projecting DA neurons makes such regulation possible. Specifically, the somata of NAc- and PFC-projecting VTA neurons were found to exhibit similar distribution patterns in rats (Margolis et al., 2008) and to be adjacent to each other (less than 100 μm apart) in mice (Lammel et al., 2008). We cannot exclude other possibilities, such as GDNF acting indirectly on local inter-neurons or synapses to regulate the spontaneous firing of PFC-projecting VTA neurons. Nevertheless, our results suggest that GDNF that is transported by a single DA neuron may affect the spontaneous firing rate of a group of neighboring DA neurons that project to several other brain regions.

A possible molecular mechanism underlying GDNF-mediated enhancement in spontaneous neuronal firing rate in the VTA

We observed that GDNF increases the activity of VTA DA neurons, but not in non-DA neurons, and these findings are in line with the observations that GFRα1 is preferentially (Sarabi et al., 2001), and Ret is exclusively (Jain et al., 2006), expressed in DA neurons in the midbrain. We also show that the activation of the MAPK pathway is required for GDNF’s action on the firing activity of DA neurons as well as for DA release. These results are in line with previous study in which we observed that infusion of GDNF into the VTA results in the rapid activation of ERK1/2 in VTA DA neurons (Carnicella et al., 2008). The fast action of GDNF on the neuronal firing of VTA DA neurons suggests a non-genomic, post-translational mechanism. One possibility is the phosphorylation of an extra-nuclear substrate of ERK1/2. The spontaneous firing frequency of DA neurons is controlled mainly by subthreshold ionic currents (Bean, 2007), and several ion channels including the A-type K+ channels (Liss et al., 2001) and voltage-gated Ca2+ channels (Puopolo et al., 2007) are activated at subthreshold potentials. However, we did not observe ERK1/2-mediated phosphorylation of Kv4.3, the A-type K channel that is expressed in the midbrain (data not shown). Another candidate is the voltage-gated Ca2+ channel. The activity of this channel is acutely enhanced by GDNF in cultured midbrain DA neurons (Wang et al., 2003) and in dorsal root ganglion neurons (Woodall et al., 2008), and several of the voltage-gated Ca2+ channel subunits contain putative MAPK phosphorylation sites (Martin et al., 2006). It is also plausible that ERK1/2 leads to the activation of a downstream kinase that will, in turn, phosphorylate one of these channels or others. Other post-translation modifications such as lipid modifications and alterations in protein-protein interactions could also contribute to this rapid effect.

Possible implications of NAc-derived GDNF regulating the spontaneous firing rate of NAc- and PFC-projecting VTA neurons

The spontaneous firing of VTA DA neurons provides DAergic tone in target areas of the mesocorticolimbic system, which was shown to be critical for cognitive functions such as working memory, planning, attention, for motivation to seek reward, and general goal-directed behaviors (Nicola, 2007; Niv et al., 2007; Schultz, 2007). Therefore, GDNF may play an important role in these cognitive functions, and this possibility merits further investigation.

In addition, DA in the NAc and PFC is also an important component of the neuronal circuitries underlying addiction (Hyman et al., 2006). By acting directly in the NAc or indirectly by enhancing the activity of VTA DA neurons, most drugs of abuse increase extracellular DA concentrations within the NAc, and repeated exposure to these drugs leads to substantial biochemical changes in the mesolimbic system (Hyman et al., 2006). Importantly, some of these neuroadaptations alter the activity of VTA DA neurons resulting in a decrease in NAc DA levels during withdrawal from the drugs (Koob and Le Moal, 2001; Hyman et al., 2006). This DA hypofunction is suggested to lead to an increased motivation to seek and consume drugs of abuse in order to compensate for the deficit in DA and the associated negative emotional state (Koob and Le Moal, 2001). Interestingly, GDNF dampens adaptations resulting from exposure to drugs of abuse (Carnicella and Ron, 2009). Therefore, it is plausible that GDNF application in the VTA may reverse the DA hypofunction, and as a consequence, dramatically reduce drug-seeking and intake.

The mesolimbic DA pathway has also been implicated in depression (Nestler and Carlezon, 2006). Specifically, hypofunction of this system following chronic stress causes a reduction in responding for rewards in animal models of anhedonia and helplessness, two major symptoms of depression in humans (Cabib and Puglisi-Allegra, 1996). Interestingly, the mRNA (Otsuki et al., 2008) and protein (Zhang et al., 2008) levels of GDNF are reduced in patients suffering from major depression, suggesting that the spontaneous firing frequency of DA neurons in the VTA in depression is reduced. Conversely, in cell culture systems several antidepressants such as amitriptyline, increase the synthesis and secretion of GDNF (Hisaoka et al., 2001). Similarly, treatment with antidepressants was found to increase GDNF levels in the serum of patients suffering from depression (Zhang et al., 2008). Thus, the antidepressant-mediated increase in GDNF expression may restore the spontaneous firing activity of these neurons, and ameliorate symptoms of depression.

In summary, our findings suggest that NAc-produced GDNF alters the spontaneous activity of VTA DA neurons that project to two distinct brain regions (the NAc and PFC). This long-distance retrograde GDNF-mediated enhancement in spontaneous firing activity, which leads to the increase of transmitter release, is likely to contribute to the regulation and maintenance of DA tone.

Supplementary Material

Supp1

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by NIH-NIAAA R01 AA014366 (D.R.), the State of California for Medical Research on Alcohol and Substance Abuse through the University of California, San Francisco (D.R.), by the Department of the Army, Grant # W81XWH-07-1-0079 (D.R.) for which the U.S. Army Medical Research Acquisition Activity, 820 Chandler Street, Fort Detrick, MD 21702-5014 is the awarding and administering acquisition office. The content of the information represented does not necessarily reflect the position or the policy of the Government, and no official endorsement should be inferred, and NIH/NIDA Intramural Research Program (T.S.), and an NRSA-NIAAA F31 AA017801 and the Merck Scholar Award (S.A.). The authors thank Ms. Wenheng Zhu for technical support, Dr. Elyssa Margolis for technical support, helpful discussions and critical review of the manuscript, Drs. Billy Chen, Robert Froemke, and Patricia Janak for critical review of the manuscript, and Drs. Howard Fields and Greg Hjelmstad for helpful discussions.

References

  1. Airaksinen MS, Saarma M. The GDNF family: signalling, biological functions and therapeutic value. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002;3:383–394. doi: 10.1038/nrn812. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Barroso-Chinea P, Cruz-Muros I, Aymerich MS, Rodriguez-Diaz M, Afonso-Oramas D, Lanciego JL, Gonzalez-Hernandez T. Striatal expression of GDNF and differential vulnerability of midbrain dopaminergic cells. Eur J Neurosci. 2005;21:1815–1827. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2005.04024.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bean BP. The action potential in mammalian central neurons. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2007;8:451–465. doi: 10.1038/nrn2148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cabib S, Puglisi-Allegra S. Stress, depression and the mesolimbic dopamine system. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1996;128:331–342. doi: 10.1007/s002130050142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Carnicella S, Kharazia V, Jeanblanc J, Janak PH, Ron D. GDNF is a fast-acting potent inhibitor of alcohol consumption and relapse. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:8114–8119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0711755105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Carnicella S, Ahmadiantehrani S, He DY, Nielsen CK, Bartlett SE, Janak PH, Ron D. Cabergoline decreases alcohol drinking and seeking behaviors via glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor. Biol Psychiatry. 2009;66:146–153. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2008.12.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Carnicella S, Ron D. GDNF--a potential target to treat addiction. Pharmacol Ther. 2009;122:9–18. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2008.12.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Deierborg T, Soulet D, Roybon L, Hall V, Brundin P. Emerging restorative treatments for Parkinson's disease. Prog Neurobiol. 2008;85:407–432. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2008.05.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Grace AA, Bunney BS. The control of firing pattern in nigral dopamine neurons: single spike firing. J Neurosci. 1984;4:2866–2876. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.04-11-02866.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Granholm AC, Reyland M, Albeck D, Sanders L, Gerhardt G, Hoernig G, Shen L, Westphal H, Hoffer B. Glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor is essential for postnatal survival of midbrain dopamine neurons. J Neurosci. 2000;20:3182–3190. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-09-03182.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hahn J, Tse TE, Levitan ES. Long-term K+ channel-mediated dampening of dopamine neuron excitability by the antipsychotic drug haloperidol. J Neurosci. 2003;23:10859–10866. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-34-10859.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. He DY, Ron D. Autoregulation of glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor expression: implications for the long-lasting actions of the anti-addiction drug, Ibogaine. Faseb J. 2006;20:2420–2422. doi: 10.1096/fj.06-6394fje. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Henderson CE, Phillips HS, Pollock RA, Davies AM, Lemeulle C, Armanini M, Simmons L, Moffet B, Vandlen RA, Simpson LC, et al. GDNF: a potent survival factor for motoneurons present in peripheral nerve and muscle. Science. 1994;266:1062–1064. doi: 10.1126/science.7973664. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hisaoka K, Nishida A, Koda T, Miyata M, Zensho H, Morinobu S, Ohta M, Yamawaki S. Antidepressant drug treatments induce glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) synthesis and release in rat C6 glioblastoma cells. J Neurochem. 2001;79:25–34. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2001.00531.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hyman SE, Malenka RC, Nestler EJ. Neural mechanisms of addiction: the role of reward-related learning and memory. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2006;29:565–598. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.29.051605.113009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Jain S, Golden JP, Wozniak D, Pehek E, Johnson EM, Jr, Milbrandt J. RET is dispensable for maintenance of midbrain dopaminergic neurons in adult mice. J Neurosci. 2006;26:11230–11238. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1876-06.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Johnson SW, Seutin V, North RA. Burst firing in dopamine neurons induced by N- methyl-D-aspartate: role of electrogenic sodium pump. Science. 1992;258:665–667. doi: 10.1126/science.1329209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Joyce EM, Stinus L, Iversen SD. Effect of injections of 6-OHDA into either nucleus accumbens septi or frontal cortex on spontaneous and drug-induced activity. Neuropharmacology. 1983;22:1141–1145. doi: 10.1016/0028-3908(83)90051-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Keefe KA, Zigmond MJ, Abercrombie ED. In vivo regulation of extracellular dopamine in the neostriatum: influence of impulse activity and local excitatory amino acids. J Neural Transm Gen Sect. 1993;91:223–240. doi: 10.1007/BF01245233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Khaliq ZM, Bean BP. Pacemaking in dopaminergic ventral tegmental area neurons: depolarizing drive from background and voltage-dependent sodium conductances. J Neurosci. 2010;30:7401–7413. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0143-10.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kobori N, Waymire JC, Haycock JW, Clifton GL, Dash PK. Enhancement of tyrosine hydroxylase phosphorylation and activity by glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:2182–2191. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M310734200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Koob GF, Le Moal M. Drug addiction, dysregulation of reward, and allostasis. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2001;24:97–129. doi: 10.1016/S0893-133X(00)00195-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Lammel S, Hetzel A, Hackel O, Jones I, Liss B, Roeper J. Unique properties of mesoprefrontal neurons within a dual mesocorticolimbic dopamine system. Neuron. 2008;57:760–773. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.01.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Lauterborn JC, Rex CS, Kramar E, Chen LY, Pandyarajan V, Lynch G, Gall CM. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor rescues synaptic plasticity in a mouse model of fragile X syndrome. J Neurosci. 2007;27:10685–10694. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2624-07.2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Ledda F, Paratcha G, Sandoval-Guzman T, Ibanez CF. GDNF and GFRα1 promote formation of neuronal synapses by ligand-induced cell adhesion. Nat Neurosci. 2007;10:293–300. doi: 10.1038/nn1855. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Lin LF, Doherty DH, Lile JD, Bektesh S, Collins F. GDNF: a glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor for midbrain dopaminergic neurons. Science. 1993;260:1130–1132. doi: 10.1126/science.8493557. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Liss B, Franz O, Sewing S, Bruns R, Neuhoff H, Roeper J. Tuning pacemaker frequency of individual dopaminergic neurons by Kv4.3L and KChip3.1 transcription. Embo J. 2001;20:5715–5724. doi: 10.1093/emboj/20.20.5715. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Lu L, Wang X, Wu P, Xu C, Zhao M, Morales M, Harvey BK, Hoffer BJ, Shaham Y. Role of ventral tegmental area glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor in incubation of cocaine craving. Biol Psychiatry. 2009;66:137–145. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.02.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Lu XY, Ghasemzadeh MB, Kalivas PW. Expression of D1 receptor, D2 receptor, substance P and enkephalin messenger RNAs in the neurons projecting from the nucleus accumbens. Neuroscience. 1998;82:767–780. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4522(97)00327-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Magby JP, Bi C, Chen ZY, Lee FS, Plummer MR. Single-cell characterization of retrograde signaling by brain-derived neurotrophic factor. J Neurosci. 2006;26:13531–13536. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4576-06.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Margolis EB, Mitchell JM, Ishikawa J, Hjelmstad GO, Fields HL. Midbrain dopamine neurons: projection target determines action potential duration and dopamine D2 receptor inhibition. J Neurosci. 2008;28:8908–8913. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1526-08.2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Martin SW, Butcher AJ, Berrow NS, Richards MW, Paddon RE, Turner DJ, Dolphin AC, Sihra TS, Fitzgerald EM. Phosphorylation sites on calcium channel α1 andβ subunits regulate ERK-dependent modulation of neuronal N-type calcium channels. Cell Calcium. 2006;39:275–292. doi: 10.1016/j.ceca.2005.11.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Nestler EJ, Carlezon WA., Jr The mesolimbic dopamine reward circuit in depression. Biol Psychiatry. 2006;59:1151–1159. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.09.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Nicola SM. The nucleus accumbens as part of a basal ganglia action selection circuit. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2007;191:521–550. doi: 10.1007/s00213-006-0510-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Niv Y, Daw ND, Joel D, Dayan P. Tonic dopamine: opportunity costs and the control of response vigor. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2007;191:507–520. doi: 10.1007/s00213-006-0502-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Oo TF, Ries V, Cho J, Kholodilov N, Burke RE. Anatomical basis of glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor expression in the striatum and related basal ganglia during postnatal development of the rat. J Comp Neurol. 2005;484:57–67. doi: 10.1002/cne.20463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Otsuki K, Uchida S, Watanuki T, Wakabayashi Y, Fujimoto M, Matsubara T, Funato H, Watanabe Y. Altered expression of neurotrophic factors in patients with major depression. J Psychiatr Res. 2008;42:1145–1153. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2008.01.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Pascual A, Hidalgo-Figueroa M, Piruat JI, Pintado CO, Gomez-Diaz R, Lopez-Barneo J. Absolute requirement of GDNF for adult catecholaminergic neuron survival. Nat Neurosci. 2008;11:755–761. doi: 10.1038/nn.2136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Pochon NA, Menoud A, Tseng JL, Zurn AD, Aebischer P. Neuronal GDNF expression in the adult rat nervous system identified by in situ hybridization. Eur J Neurosci. 1997;9:463–471. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.1997.tb01623.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Puopolo M, Raviola E, Bean BP. Roles of subthreshold calcium current and sodium current in spontaneous firing of mouse midbrain dopamine neurons. J Neurosci. 2007;27:645–656. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4341-06.2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Regehr WG, Carey MR, Best AR. Activity-dependent regulation of synapses by retrograde messengers. Neuron. 2009;63:154–170. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2009.06.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Sarabi A, Hoffer BJ, Olson L, Morales M. GFRα-1 mRNA in dopaminergic and nondopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra and ventral tegmental area. J Comp Neurol. 2001;441:106–117. doi: 10.1002/cne.1400. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Schultz W. Multiple dopamine functions at different time courses. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2007;30:259–288. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.28.061604.135722. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Swanson LW. The projections of the ventral tegmental area and adjacent regions: a combined fluorescent retrograde tracer and immunofluorescence study in the rat. Brain Res Bull. 1982;9:321–353. doi: 10.1016/0361-9230(82)90145-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Tomac A, Lindqvist E, Lin LF, Ogren SO, Young D, Hoffer BJ, Olson L. Protection and repair of the nigrostriatal dopaminergic system by GDNF in vivo. Nature. 1995a;373:335–339. doi: 10.1038/373335a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Tomac A, Widenfalk J, Lin LF, Kohno T, Ebendal T, Hoffer BJ, Olson L. Retrograde axonal transport of glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor in the adult nigrostriatal system suggests a trophic role in the adult. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995b;92:8274–8278. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.18.8274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Trupp M, Belluardo N, Funakoshi H, Ibanez CF. Complementary and overlapping expression of glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF), c-ret proto- oncogene, and GDNF receptor-α indicates multiple mechanisms of trophic actions in the adult rat CNS. J Neurosci. 1997;17:3554–3567. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-10-03554.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Wang J, Chen G, Lu B, Wu CP. GDNF acutely potentiates Ca2+ channels and excitatory synaptic transmission in midbrain dopaminergic neurons. Neurosignals. 2003;12:78–88. doi: 10.1159/000071817. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Woodall AJ, Richards MA, Turner DJ, Fitzgerald EM. Growth factors differentially regulate neuronal Cav channels via ERK-dependent signalling. Cell Calcium. 2008;43:562–575. doi: 10.1016/j.ceca.2007.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Yang F, Feng L, Zheng F, Johnson SW, Du J, Shen L, Wu CP, Lu B. GDNF acutely modulates excitability and A-type K+ channels in midbrain dopaminergic neurons. Nat Neurosci. 2001;4:1071–1078. doi: 10.1038/nn734. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Zapata A, Shippenberg TS. Lack of functional D2 receptors prevents the effects of the D3-preferring agonist (+)-PD 128907 on dialysate dopamine levels. Neuropharmacology. 2005;48:43–50. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2004.09.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Zhang X, Poo MM. Localized synaptic potentiation by BDNF requires local protein synthesis in the developing axon. Neuron. 2002;36:675–688. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(02)01023-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Zhang X, Zhang Z, Xie C, Xi G, Zhou H, Zhang Y, Sha W. Effect of treatment on serum glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor in depressed patients. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2008;32:886–890. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2008.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supp1
NIHMS248463-supplement-Supp1.pdf (2.5MB, pdf)

RESOURCES