Abstract
Inhibitory interneurons of the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus of the thalamus modulate the activity of thalamocortical cells in response to excitatory input through the release of inhibitory neurotransmitter from both axons and dendrites. The exact mechanisms by which release can occur from dendrites are, however, not well understood. Recent experiments using calcium imaging have suggested that Na/K based action potentials can evoke calcium transients in dendrites via local active conductances, making the back-propagating action potential a candidate for dendritic neurotransmitter release. In this study, we employed high temporal and spatial resolution voltage-sensitive dye imaging to assess the characteristics of dendritic voltage deflections in response to Na/K action potentials in interneurons of the mouse dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus. We found that trains or single action potentials elicited by somatic current injection or local synaptic stimulation led to action potentials that rapidly and actively back-propagated throughout the entire dendritic arbor and into the fine filiform dendritic appendages known to release GABAergic vesicles. Action potentials always appeared first in the soma or proximal dendrite in response to somatic current injection or local synaptic stimulation, and the rapid back-propagation into the dendritic arbor depended upon voltage-gated sodium and TEA-sensitive potassium channels. Our results indicate that thalamic interneuron dendrites integrate synaptic inputs that initiate action potentials, most likely in the axon initial segment, that then back-propagate with high-fidelity into the dendrites, resulting in a nearly synchronous release of GABA from both axonal and dendritic compartments.
Introduction
The most common site for neurotransmitter release between neurons is at synaptic terminals located along or at the ends of axons. However, there are a significant number of brain regions where transmitter release occurs from dendrites or dendritic appendages (For review see Kennedy and Ehlers, 2011). Although axonal transmitter release has been extensively studied in the mammalian brain, dendritic transmitter release has been difficult to study, owing in part to the difficulty in obtaining electrical recordings from fine dendritic structures. The thalamus is one area were dendrodendritic synaptic transmission is prevalent and experimentally approachable.
In mammals, visual information is passed from the retina to the visual cortex mainly through the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus of the thalamus (LGNd). In the LGNd, retinal ganglion cells form excitatory synapses onto thalamocortical cells, which in turn project to layer 4 of the visual cortex. Interestingly, only 5–10% of terminals onto thalamocortical cells are from the retina, the primary sensory input to this region (Erişir et al. 1997b). The remainder of contacts onto thalamocortical cells arises from brainstem, layer 6 of visual cortex, reticular thalamus, and intrathalamic inhibitory neurons. These non-retinal synapses are believed to play a role in shaping the response of thalamocortical cells to retinal input. Of particular importance are inhibitory (γ-aminobutyric acid; GABA) connections, formed by local circuit neurons onto proximal regions of thalamocortical dendrites. Inhibitory interneurons have been implicated in controlling the precise spike timing of thalamocortical cells to retinal excitation, and in refinement of thalamocortical receptive fields (Guillery and Sherman, 2002; Sillito and Kemp, 1983; Berardi and Morrone, 1984; Blitz and Regehr, 2005). Canonically, this inhibition would be accomplished by generation of an action potential in response to retinal input, which would propagate along the interneuron axon causing vesicular GABAergic release from axonal terminals onto thalamocortical dendrites. Thalamic interneurons, however, are unique in that they express GABAergic vesicles not only in axonal boutons, but also in dendritic appendages (Famiglietti, 1970; Famiglietti and Peters, 1972; Rafols and Valverde, 1973; Montero, 1986). A majority of interneuron synapses in the LGNd are made by these dendritic boutons. While axonal release is typically controlled by action potential propagation into terminal boutons, it is less certain whether action potentials can propagate completely throughout the interneuron dendritic arbor to promote vesicle release from dendritic appendages. Although calcium imaging experiments have suggested that Na/K action potentials can propagate into the dendrites to promote calcium transients (Acuna-Goycolea et al., 2008), a direct measure of Na/K action potentials in the interneuron dendrite has been precluded by the dendrite’s fine caliber.
In our study, we used a combination of high temporal and spatial resolution voltage-sensitive dye imaging to demonstrate that trains of action potentials actively propagate throughout the entire interneuron dendrite and into dendritic appendages. Activation of TTX-sensitive Na+ channels was necessary for dendritic action potential propagation, while TEA-sensitive K+ channels were important for dendritic action potential repolarization. Despite the active and reliable back-propagation of action potentials throughout the dendritic arbor, local synaptic inputs alone failed to initiate spikes in interneuron dendrites. Thus, the generation of an action potential in thalamic interneurons can result in a rapid and global inhibitory signal through the release of GABA from both axons as well as dendritic terminals.
Methods
Slice preparation and maintenance
We prepared coronal slices of mouse thalamus (LGNd) from GAD67-GFP mice (gift from Dr. Yanagawa, Gunma University) in accordance with national and institutional guidelines. Male or female mice (23–54 days old) were deeply anesthetized with sodium pentobarbital (50 mg/kg) and killed through decapitation. The brain was rapidly removed and placed in ice-cold (<5° C) cutting solution containing the following (in mM): 2.5 KCl, 1.2 NaH2PO4, 26 NaHCO3, 10 dextrose, 215 sucrose, 2 MgSO4, 2 CaCl2. Coronal slices, 250 µm thick, were cut on a Leica microslicer in ice-cold cutting solution and transferred to a 35° C incubation chamber containing artificial CSF (in mM: 126 NaCl, 2.5 KCl, 1.25 NaH2PO4, 26 NaHCO3, 25 dextrose, 2 MgSO4, 2 CaCl2). Slices were allowed to incubate for at least 1 hr before dye loading and recording in a submersion chamber.
Cell selection
The voltage-sensitive dye imaging system is constructed around an upright microscope (Olympus BX51WI) equipped to switch readily between three different imaging systems: (1) confocal epifluorescence for cell selection and morphological reconstruction (Yokogawa CSU-22; Solamere Technology); (2) infrared-differential interference contrast (IR-DIC) video microscopy for establishing whole-cell recordings; (3) wide-field epifluorescence for voltage-sensitive dye imaging. Slices were initially examined with the confocal imaging system to determine morphological completeness of individual GFP-positive cells using an optically pumped semiconductor laser (Sapphire 488-20, Coherent). Suitable cells for wide-field voltage-sensitive dye imaging had intact dendritic arbors that were lying within a single focal plane located within 50 µm of the slice surface. These criteria ensure that large portions of the dendritic arbor can be monitored simultaneously with minimal degradation of the image from light scattering in the tissue. The GFP fluorescence does not interfere with voltage-sensitive dye signals because of the non-overlapping emission spectra of these two fluorophores.
Voltage-sensitive dye loading and recording
Suitable GFP-positive neurons were loaded with voltage dye through a glass patch electrode by filling the tip with dye-free internal solution (in mM: 130 K-gluconate, 7 KCl, 4 ATP-Mg, 0.3 GTP-Na, 10 phosphocreatine-Na, 10 HEPES, 0.4% biocytin, adjusted to pH 7.4 and 284 mOsm), and back-filling with dye-containing internal solution (JPW3028; 400–800 µM), as pioneered earlier (Grinvald et al., 1987). The voltage-sensitive dye JPW3028 is a doubly positively charged analog of the aminostryryl-pyridinium series of lipophilic voltage-sensitive dyes available from Invitrogen as D-6923. This electrochromic dye does not significantly increase the membrane capacitance of the labeled neuron as evident from a number of control measurements showing that the waveform of the electrically recorded action potentials remains unaltered after intracellular application of the dye (Canepari et al., 2007; Foust et al., 2010). The physical basis for the lack of the capacitive load effect, characteristic for some fluorescence resonance energy transfer (e.g. dipicrylamine), as well as some protein voltage probes, is that the interaction of the electric field with electrochromic dyes leads to a charge movement across only a very small fraction of the membrane field (the size of the chromophore) (Blunck et al., 2005). Action potential waveform characteristics recorded electrically at the soma (10–90 % rise time, full width at half-height, threshold, amplitude) were unchanged between dye loaded and unloaded cells (p > 0.05, unpaired T-test, n = 13 for each group). Dye-free solution in the tip of the patch electrode was necessary to prevent spilling the highly lipophilic dye onto the slice prior to patching the cell of interest. Dye bound to membrane outside the cell of interest would increase the background fluorescence (F), thus degrading recording sensitivity. A whole-cell somatic recording was obtained from the selected neuron at room temperature (22° C) under IR-DIC optics, and the dye was allowed to diffuse into the cell for 15–30 min. After filling, the patch electrode was removed from the neuron forming an outside-out patch and the cell was incubated at 35° C for at least 1 hr, allowing the dye to diffuse from the soma into distal processes. This dye has a slower diffusion rate compared to other dyes of similar size/weight due to its highly lipophilic nature. The filled neuron was then repatched near physiological temperature (35° C) with a voltage-sensitive dye free patch electrode for simultaneous optical and electrophysiological recording.
Voltage-sensitive dye-filled neurons were illuminated with a 450 mW frequency-doubled diode-pumped Nd:YVO4 low-noise laser emitting at 532 nm (MLL532; Changchun New Industries Optoelectronics Technology). The laser beam was directed to a light guide coupled to the microscope via a single-port epifluorescence condenser (TILL Photonics) designed to overfill the back aperture of the objective. Back-filling the aperture allowed near uniform illumination of the object plane. Somatic illumination was limited by the microscope field-stop to minimize damage to the recorded neuron. Fluorescence from the stained cell was collected through the objective (60X water-immersion; 1.0 numerical aperture; Nikon), long-pass filtered (RG610 HP; Schott, Duryea, PA), and projected onto a 80 × 80 pixel high-speed CCD camera with a 10 kHz maximum frame rate (NeuroCCD-SMQ; RedShirtImaging) mounted at the front camera port of the trinocular tube. At the magnifications that we used, each pixel of the camera corresponded to a square region of 4, 1, or 0.4 µm per side, depending on the use of either no coupler (resulting in 0.4 um per side), or installation of either a 0.3X or 0.1X coupler (Optem serial #25-70-12 and RL091301-1). Reduced pixel sizes were ideal for identifying and optically recording fluorescence changes in dendritic boutons. Changes in voltage-sensitive dye fluorescence were recorded in response to action potentials initiated by intrasomatic current injections (50 or 5 ms duration) or local synaptic stimulation (theta glass bipolar, 200 µs, 100–500 µA). Our first experiments, performed to determine voltage deflections in dendrites in response to somatically elicited action potentials, were optically recorded at a frame rate of 2 kHz allowing the imaging of an approximately 320 × 320 µm region of the LGNd simultaneously. At this frame rate, 1–3 trials could be averaged to achieve a signal-to-noise (S/N) ratio of at least 6. For assessment of action potential kinetics, we collected CCD images at 10 kHz, limiting the recording area to 320 × 48 µm. At 10 kHz, 1–10 trials could be averaged to yield S/N ratios of at least 4. Action potential propagation into dendritic boutons typically required averages of 2–10 trials to obtain suitable S/N due to the decreased area of light collection. Optical recordings were also achieved in the presence of specific channel blockers to determine the participation of certain currents in dendritic action potential propagation.
To assess voltage-gated sodium channels, we bath applied tetrodotoxin (TTX; 1 µm, Tocris-Cookson Inc.) and recorded voltage-sensitive dye fluorescence changes in voltage clamp in response to the application of action potential-like waveforms that were recorded in the same neurons prior to TTX application. For these experiments, somatic fluorescence changes were monitored to ensure injected waveforms caused somatic voltage changes similar to those seen during control (pre-TTX) conditions. It was sometimes necessary to multiply the injected waveform by a gain factor (1.5–4) to achieve fluorescence amplitude changes at the soma that were within 15% of control, presumably due to imperfect compensation of series access resistance, filtering by pipette capacitance, or space clamp issues. Potassium channel experiments used bath application of tetraethylammonium chloride (TEA; 1 mM, Sigma-Aldrich) to block Kv3 family channels, iberiotoxin (IBTX; 100 nM, Tocris-Cookson Inc.) to block calcium-activated potassium channels (BK channels), and α–dendrotoxin (α-DTX; 100 nM, Alomone Labs) to block low threshold activated Kv1 family channels. During toxin experiments, a period of 5–10 minutes was used to collect 1–5 control conditions in the dendrite in response to somatically elicited action potentials before addition of the drug. After 5–10 minutes with the drug in the bath, the same dendritic location was imaged for 5–10 trials over approximately 20 min. Drugs were washed out for at least 20–30 min before 2–10 trials were obtained from the same dendritic region.
For local synaptic stimulation, a voltage-sensitive dye filled dendrite, the dendrite of interest, was imaged on the CCD camera and a theta-glass stimulation electrode was positioned within 20–50 µm of the dendrite and 50–100 µm away from the cell soma. Voltage-sensitive dye fluorescence changes were imaged in the dendrite of interest in response to a 50 ms somatic current injection that elicited one or more action potentials. The first action potential in this “control” condition served as a baseline assessment of fluorescence kinetics and propagation in response to a somatic action potential. We compared control condition kinetics and propagation to synaptically activated action potential kinetics and propagation. Trials lasted 20–100 ms, depending on the experimental conditions, and the voltage-sensitive dye was illuminated only during this period. We could obtain between 15 and 35 trials before changes in the electrophysiological properties of the recorded neuron (action potential amplitude and duration, resting membrane potential, resting input resistance) were evident (> 10% of baseline values), in which case the experiment was terminated. After experimentation, confocal z-stacks were obtained of the voltage-sensitive dye filled interneuron and its full dendritic arbor.
Computer Simulations
Computer simulations were performed in a simplified three compartment model (compartments contained segmentations of 1, 5, and 50 for the soma, axon and dendrite, respectively) of an LGNd interneuron using NEURON (Carnevale and Hines, 2006). The model cell consisted of a 15 µm long cell body (diameter of 10 µm) to which a single dendrite with a length of 450 µm and a linear diameter taper from 3.5 to 1.5 µm was attached. A 50 µm long axon with a diameter of 1 µm was attached to the opposite side of the soma from the dendrite. The axial and membrane resistivity were set to 100 Ω-cm and 20 kΩ-cm2, respectively. Other passive properties of the cell were as follows: ELeak = −65 mV, ENa = 60 mV, EK = −90 mV, and membrane capacitance was set to 1 µF/cm2 for the soma and axon and 2 µF/cm2 for the dendrite. Hodgkin and Huxley-like voltage-gated sodium channels were inserted in the axon (gNa = 8000 pS/µm2) and soma (gNa = 200 pS/µm2). A high-threshold activated, fast-deactivating potassium channel was inserted into the axon and soma (gKHT = 500 pS/µm2). Parameters of voltage-gated channels were based on previously published experimental and modeling studies (Rothman and Manis, 2003; Yu et al., 2008; Mainen et al., 1995; McCormick and Hugenard, 1992). Synaptic inputs were simulated by an alpha function: g=gmax*(T/τ)*e−(T-τ)/τ, where the time constant τ varied between 2–10 msec and gmax was varied between 0.001 and 0.1 nS.
Dendritic voltage-gated sodium channels and potassium channels were varied to assess the contribution of these channels to action potential propagation along the dendrite while the somatic and axonal conductances and passive properties of the model were held constant. In the 100% to 0% dendritic gradient, sodium and potassium conductances decayed linearly from 100% of the somatic value (gNa = 200 pS/µm2, gKHT = 500 pS/µm2) at the proximal dendrite to 0 conductance at the distal tip. Under the 50% to 25% dendritic condition sodium and potassium conductances decreased linearly from 50% of the somatic conductance (gNa = 100 pS/µm2, gKHT = 250 pS/µm2) to 25% of the somatic conductance (gNa = 50 pS/µm2, gKHT = 125 pS/µm2). In the passive condition, potassium conductances followed the linear decay described by the 50% to 25% condition and no sodium conductance was included in the dendrite. Full width at half-maximum amplitude, 10–90 % rise time, 90–10 % fall time, and amplitude of the action potential were calculated at each position along the dendrite. All simulations were performed at a temperature of 35° C.
Data analysis
The S/N of imaged voltage deflections varied from cell to cell depending in part on the concentration of dye and proximity of the dendrites to the surface of the slice. Thus, to achieve suitable S/N, we averaged fluorescence changes from groups of neighboring pixels (4–25). Although we typically could obtain suitable S/N in single-trial recordings, in some cases we averaged a small number (2–10) of trials. To avoid smearing in the trial-to-trial average because of temporal jitter, for each trial we shifted the signal in each pixel by the time needed to align the peak of the electrically recorded somatic action potential. A low-pass binomial filter (1–3 pass) was applied to reduce high-frequency noise. Within trial bleaching and low-frequency noise were removed by subtracting an exponential or polynomial function fit to the smoothed fluorescence signal. The waveforms of fluorescence action potential signals were cubic spline interpolated to 100 kHz to precisely estimate certain kinetics of the waveform (e.g., width, 10–90% rise time, 90-10% fall time). The width of the spike-associated fluorescence change was measured at the half-maximum amplitude. The 10–90% rise time of the fluorescence change was determined by calculating the difference between the time of 10% and 90% of the maximum amplitude of the fluorescence change from the preceding baseline fluorescence. The ΔF/F signal from different parts of the neuron varies due to factors other than voltage (e.g., density of dye, partitioning of dye in inner and outer membranes, depth of process in tissue, etc.), precluding any straight forward conversion of ΔF/F into voltage (Salzberg, 1983). The dye does, however, linearly follow voltage changes in the physiological range with microsecond precision (see Salzberg et al., 1993), making a comparison of the kinetics of fluorescence changes in the dendrite a reliable measure. For characterization of changes in kinetics of fluorescence signals with distance from the soma, identical numbers of pixels were taken at different distances along the dendrite of a single cell. Additionally, waveforms from single cells received the same amount of low-pass filtering to accurately compare changes in waveform kinetics within a cell. The reported distance along the dendrite was determined with the program ImageJ (nih.gov) as the path length from the center of the soma to the center of the group of pixels averaged. The effects of blockers, or changes in stimulation protocol, were assessed by examining the changes in action potential waveform from the same pixels before, after, and following washout of each manipulation.
To determine propagation speed and direction, we compared the time of the half-maximum amplitude fluorescence change in the dendrite to that recorded optically at the edge of the soma. This method was superior to using either the foot or the peak of the action potentials, since both of these are characterized by a slowly changing membrane potential, allowing for substantial temporal jitter to be introduced by small variations in the accuracy of amplitude measurement. For experiments in which EPSPs were elicited by synaptic inputs, we used the electrical recording in the soma owing to the low S/N ratio of somatic voltage-sensitive dye signal (which results from the presence of high background of dye bound to intrasomatic organelle membranes). To determine the location of EPSP initiation, we compared the time of half height of the EPSP in the somatic recording to the half-height of the fluorescence change in the dendrite. We confirmed this to be a valid method of analysis by comparing the timing of half-height of action potentials at the soma between the electrical and optical recording, which were not statistically different (n = 13, p > 0.05).
Results
Action potentials propagate throughout the dendritic arbor and into putative dendritic boutons
To assess the propagation of action potentials into the thalamic interneuron dendritic arbor, we first used a 2 kHz frame rate to image an approximately 320 × 320 µm portion of the LGNd. This allowed us to image an entire section of voltage-sensitive dye filled dendritic arbor on one side of the interneuron soma. Our imaging location could easily be moved between trials to determine the ability of a stimulus to cause voltage changes in the entire dendritic structure. At a 2 kHz frame rate, we determined that action potentials elicited by somatic current injection caused action potential shaped voltage deflections in the full dendritic arbor, including across branch points and into distal dendritic tips, even on single trials (Figure 1A,B; n = 5 cells).
Increasing the sampling rate to 10 kHz allowed us to assess more accurately the kinetics of the fluorescence changes in dendrites in response to intrasomatically elicited action potentials. Recording at the increased temporal resolution restricted our region of interest to an approximately 320 × 48 µm section in which we could typically image one dendrite and its branches. Fluorescence changes representing action potentials occurred throughout the length of the sampled dendrite, invading all portions of each branch on every trial without failure (Figure 2; n = 30).
The dendrites of thalamic interneurons release GABAergic vesicles from knob-like structures connected to the parent dendrite through fine, filiform appendages (Rafols and Valverde, 1973; Famiglietti, 1970; Famiglietti and Peters, 1972; Montero, 1986). We used high spatial (1 × 1 or 0.4 × 0.4 µm per pixel) and temporal (10 kHz) resolution imaging to assess the ability of action potentials to invade these small dendritic boutons. Using an optical coupler, an approximately 80 × 12 or 32 × 5 µm segment of dendrite containing putative dendritic boutons was imaged at a distance of 20 to 120 µm from the soma. In response to a somatic current injection that elicited 1 or more action potentials, spike-shaped fluorescence changes were seen in both parent dendrites and putative dendritic terminals (Figure 2C–F; n = 8 cells, n = 12 boutons). In 4 cells, multiple boutons on different dendrites arising from the soma were imaged. We found that action potentials invaded all dendrites and dendritic appendages regardless of which parent dendrite was imaged. Action potentials were also seen to propagate into dendritic appendages that occurred after dendritic branch points. Imaging regions of similar size to that of the dendritic appendages, except in a region not over any observed dendritic branch, resulted in no significant signal, indicating that the responses we observed were not due to light scatter (Figure 2A, B). These results suggest that somatic action potentials reliably invade all dendritic branches and appendages.
The kinetics of the action potential as it propagated along the dendrite varied systematically with distance. The full width at half-height, 10–90% rise time, and 90-10% fall time of the fluorescence signals increased with distance from the soma (Figure 3A–C). The action potential became both slower and broader as it traveled into the distal regions of the dendrite. However, this was not true for local propagation of action potentials into the dendritic boutons. Comparison of full width at half-height of the action potential between the parent dendrite and the adjacent dendritic bouton revealed no significant change in width (p > 0.05). These results are similar to those reported for pyramidal cell dendritic spines (Holthoff et al., 2010).
With a 10 kHz sampling rate, we could also examine the propagation of the action potential in the dendrite. We compared soma to dendrite latencies, defined as the difference between the time of action potential half-height at the dendrite and the soma, in contiguous regions spanning from the edge of the soma to approximately 200 µm down the dendrite. In response to intrasomatic current injection, action potentials were invariably found to appear first at the soma or proximal dendrite and propagate toward the distal dendrite (Figure 4; n = 14 cells). In rodent LGNd, the axon of local interneurons often arises from the trunk of a primary dendrite within 20 – 50 µm of the soma (Rafols and Valverde 1973; Perreault et al., 2003 Figure 1; Acuna-Goycolea et al., 2008 Figure 2). Although we could not always identify axons in our recorded neurons, this anatomical arrangement is consistent with the finding that in a majority of our neurons (n = 10/14) the action potential appeared in the proximal dendrite prior to the soma or distal dendrite. In the first 100 µm of the dendrite, action potentials traveled at speeds of 1.09 m/sec (SEM ± 0.12; n = 12 cells), which is similar to the propagation speed of mammalian unmyelinated axons (Yu et al., 2008; Popovic et al., 2011; Foust et al., 2010; Andersen et al., 2000; Meeks and Mennerick, 2007; Kress et al., 2008; Schmidt-Heiber et al., 2008, for review see Debanne et al., 2011), and faster than that typically associated with dendritic action potential propagation (Stuart et al., 1997; Williams and Stuart, 2000; Shu et al., 2007, Nevian et al., 2007; Antic, 2003; Ledergerber and Larkum, 2010; Stuart and Hausser, 1994; Hausser et al., 1995; Djurisic et al., 2004; Zhou et al., 2008) Interestingly, previous investigations of dendritic action potential propagation in fast spiking GABAergic neurons of the hippocampus have also revealed rapid velocities (Martina et al., 2000 and Hu et al., 2010). The scatter plot of latency for contiguous 8 or 16 µm sections of soma and dendrite clearly showed an increase in the time of spike latency with increasing distance from the soma (Figure 4D gray dots, n = 14). Averaging the soma to dendrite latency for bins of 20 µm for the first 0–120 µm of the dendrite and then using bin sizes of 30 and 60 µm for 120–150 and 150–210 µm distances, respectively, revealed an increasing delay in action potential latency (Figure 4D, black line). Thus, it appears that in response to an intrasomatic current injection, action potentials initiate in the proximal somatodendritic (presumably axonal) region of the interneuron and propagate out into the distal dendrite. Although action potential propagation speed decreased with distance from the soma, it was rapid enough to result in the generation of an action potential at approximately 200 µm from the soma at a latency of < 0.4 ms (Figure 4D). Since action potentials last approximately 1 ms, this rapid propagation speed insures that the entire soma-dendritic axis of the local interneuron experiences the action potential nearly simultaneously.
Multiple action potentials propagate reliably into interneuron dendrites
Response properties of feline thalamic interneurons to visual stimuli in vivo are indistinguishable from those of X-type thalamocortical cells (Sherman and Friedlander, 1988). In the mouse, the LGNd is composed primarily of thalamocortical cells that exhibit X-type characteristics (e.g., sustained activation and linear summation of visual stimuli; Grubb and Thompson, 2003). X-type thalamocortical cells in the mouse can respond to sinusoidal grating in a preferred phase with firing rates between 40–130 Hz (tonic and burst mode, respectively; Grubb and Thompson, 2003 Figure 2; Grubb and Thompson, 2005, Figure 5). Here we examined the effects of action potential trains on shape and reliability during propagation into interneuron dendrites at frequencies within range of those observed in mouse relay cells (imaging rates of 2–10 kHz). Somatic step depolarizations (50 ms) were calibrated to elicit 3 to 5 action potentials and changes in fluorescence were monitored in response to each spike (Figure 5). In response to a current step of 80 pA the cell in figure 5 evoked 4 action potentials that were readily recorded optically in the dendritic branch in a single trial (Figure 5C,D). In 14 of 14 cells tested, we were able to detect changes in voltage-sensitive dye fluorescence in response to every action potential that occurred during the somatic step depolarization. Multiple action potentials could also be tracked across branch points. Trains of action potentials reliably propagated into the entire dendritic arbor.
Despite the reliable propagation of action potentials into the interneuron dendrite and across branch points, the amplitude of action potentials in a train decreased as measured both electrically at the soma and optically in the dendrite (p < 0.01 soma and dendrite; Figure 5D). Closer examination revealed not only a decrease in the amplitude of the spike, but also an increase in the rise time at both regions (p < 0.05 soma, dendrite 10–90% rise times; Figure 6E, black bars: Soma; gray bars: Dendrite). There were no significant changes in the full width at half-height or the 90–10% fall time of the action potential (p > 0.2).
An increased time for the rising phase of the action potential could be due to a decrease in the availability of voltage-gated sodium channels, owing to depolarization-induced inactivation of sodium channels. To test this hypothesis, we devised a stimulation protocol consisting of a 5 ms somatic depolarization to elicit an action potential followed by a 4 ms hyperpolarization at a frequency of 50 Hz (Figure 6B). When the cell was stimulated with a 5 ms depolarization that elicited action potentials at 50 Hz without the hyperpolarizing step, we found a rapid reduction in the amplitude of the action potential recorded electrically at the soma (data not shown). This change in height may be attributable to a long-lasting after-depolarization that occurred following the spike since subsequent action potentials were elicited during this period of depolarization. A strong (300 – 350 pA) hyperpolarizing pulse, however, could relieve the after-depolarization and return the somatic membrane potential close to rest. In response to the 50 Hz depolarizing/hyperpolarizing protocol, or to a steady 50 ms step depolarization, action potentials propagated throughout interneuron dendrites (Figure 6C, D). The depolarizing/hyperpolarizing protocol significantly reduced the amount of spike height decay between the first and third spike in a train when compared with the 50 ms step depolarization (p < 0.01, 2-way Anova). However, there remained a significant decrease in spike height at the soma and dendrite (p <0.05 soma; dendrite). Additionally, the 50 Hz protocol eliminated the increase in the rise time of the action potential compared to the 50 ms step depolarization (p < 0.01, 2-way Anova).
These results suggest that although multiple action potentials can reliably propagate throughout the dendritic arbor, recent dendritic activity can affect the availability of sodium channels and thus alter the amplitude and rising phase of subsequent action potentials.
Action potentials rely on voltage-gated sodium channels and TEA-sensitive potassium channels for dendritic propagation
Dendritic action potential propagation can be active or passive (for review see Migliore and Shepherd, 2002). To test the dependence of dendritic action potential propagation on voltage-gated sodium channels in thalamic interneurons, we examined the effects of Na+ channel block with tetrodotoxin (TTX). Under control conditions, action potentials elicited by somatic current injection readily propagated throughout the dendritic arbor (Figure 7). Following the abolition of endogenous action potentials with the bath application of TTX (1 µM), we used a scaled version of the previously recorded action potential from control conditions as a voltage command to the soma. We adjusted the amplitude of the injected waveform such that the injected stimulus waveform caused a change in fluorescence change at the soma in TTX that was within 15% of that recorded under control conditions (example Figure 7B, red and gray). We found that in the presence of TTX the amplitude of the stimulus waveform decreased rapidly and significantly with distance along the dendrite, when compared with control conditions (Figure 7B, C, D; p < 0.01 at the dendrite; p = 0.8 at the soma; n = 5 cells). These results demonstrate that action potentials are actively propagated into interneuron dendrites through the activation of voltage-activated Na+ channels.
Potassium currents are involved in controlling the propagation and repolarization of dendritic action potentials (Johnston et al., 2003; Hoffman et al., 1997, Christie and Westbrook, 2003; Nevian et al., 2007, Williams and Stuart, 2000). To determine the role of three classes of K+ current in spike propagation and repolarization in interneuron dendrites, we bath applied: tetraethylammonium chloride (TEA; 1 mM), a blocker of high-threshold activated Kv3 family channels (n = 4); iberiotoxin (IBTX; 100 nM), a blocker of calcium-activated potassium BK channels (n = 4); α-dendrotoxin (α-DTX; 100 nM), a blocker of low-threshold activated Kv1 family channels (n = 5) (Figure 8). None of the drugs tested affected the ability of action potentials to propagate into distal regions of the dendrite. Of the drugs tested, only TEA had a significant effect on action potential width at half-height at the soma and dendrite (Figure 8D). Application of TEA also reduced or abolished the fast spike afterhyperpolarization in both the soma and dendrite (Figure 8A). This pharmacological profile suggests that high-threshold activated, fast-deactivating Kv3 family K+ channels may play a significant role in shaping the falling phase of the dendritic and somatic action potential waveform.
Action potentials do not initiate in the interneuron dendrite in response to local synaptic stimulation
In certain types of interneurons in the hippocampus and in mitral cells of the olfactory bulb it has been suggested that Na/K-dependent action potentials can initiate in the dendrite (Martina et al., 2000, Djurisic et al., 2004), although in the vast majority of neurons action potentials typically initiate in the axon initial segment (Hu et al, 2010; Yu et al, 2008; Shu et al., 2007, Kole et al., 2008a, Kole et al., 2008b; Khaliq and Raman, 2006; Palmer et al., 2010; Foust et al., 2010). The participation of voltage-gated sodium channels in the propagation of the action potential in the LGNd interneuron dendrite raises the possibility that action potentials could initiate in the dendrite proper. To assess this possibility, we examined dendritic voltage responses to somatic current injection and synaptic inputs elicited by a theta-glass stimulator (placed within 50 µm of a voltage-sensitive dye labeled dendrite at distances of approximately 50 to 150 µm away from the interneuron soma). Single current pulses (100 – 500 µA, 0.2 ms duration) were delivered to the neuropil through the theta-glass stimulator. The current needed to elicit a synaptically activated action potential was determined and the stimulus intensity subsequently reduced by approximately 5% to cause just subthreshold excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs) (Figure 9B,C; n = 5). Depending on the signal to noise ratio, single trials or averages of a few (<5) trials were used to identify the location and onset latency of EPSPs in the imaged dendrites. Soma to dendrite latency was determined as the difference between the timing of action potential half-height at the dendritic region where the EPSP occurred first and the soma for both synaptically and intrasomatically elicited action potentials. For all cells tested, action potentials evoked by intrasomatic injection or synaptic stimulation appeared first at the soma and propagated to the dendritic region of interest, i.e. the dendritic location first to show an EPSP (Figure 9D, n = 5). Reducing the stimulus intensity slightly (e.g. 5 %) to just below somatic spike threshold always abolished the occurrence of an action potential in the dendrite. We did not observe any dendritic Na/K action potential-shaped voltage response in the absence of somatic spiking, even for just sub-somatic-threshold synaptic stimuli.
Interestingly, the soma to dendrite latency was greater for action potentials elicited by synaptic stimulation (in comparison to somatic current injection), suggesting that the speed with which the action potential propagated back into the dendrites was decreased (Figure 9D, p < 0.05). We hypothesize that this decreased conduction velocity may have resulted from Na+ channel inactivation owing to the strong dendritic depolarization during the EPSP. Indeed, action potentials elicited by synaptic inputs were significantly smaller in the dendrite of interest than those elicited by current injection into the soma (p < 0.01), even though these action potentials were not significantly different in amplitude at the soma (p > 0.05).
Computer simulation of interneuron dendrites
Our experimental evidence shows that action potentials propagate actively into interneuron dendrites, but become both slower and broader as they do so. Furthermore, action potential propagation speed decreases with distance from the soma, and action potentials themselves fail to initiate in the distal dendrite. Here we explore possible distributions of sodium and potassium channel densities in the interneuron dendrite that might account for these results in a simplified three compartment model (Figure 10A).
Sodium and potassium maximal conductances were held constant in the axon and soma while dendritic maximal conductances were systematically altered. We examined three different hypothetical distributions of dendritic conductances (See Methods: Computer Simulations). The first condition employed a linear decay of sodium and potassium conductances from 100% of the somatic value at the proximal dendrite to 0 active conductances at the distal tip. The second condition used a linearly decaying distribution that started at 50% of the somatic conductances and decayed to 25% at the distal dendrite. The final condition, termed “Passive,” had identical dendritic potassium conductances to the 50% to 25% condition, but no sodium conductances were included in the dendrite. For all three models, action potentials were never initiated in the dendrite proper when stimulated by a dendritic current injection or by a synaptic input simulated by an alpha function (see Methods) located at 150 µm from the cell soma (action potentials were initiated in the axonal compartment only; data not shown). Both the 50% to 25% and passive conditions were also able to mimic the spike height decay seen in a train of action potentials recorded electrically at the soma in response to a somatic step depolarization (50 ms, 200 pA). Comparing the results of the three models revealed that the 100-0% and 50–25% Na+ gradients yielded increases in spike latency (Figure 10C) and decreases in spike rise time (Figure 10E) that fit those observed in real neurons better than the passive dendritic model. In addition, the 50–25% Na+ gradient model gave a better fit to the increase in fall-time of the action potential (Figure 10F), and increased spike width (Figure 10D), with dendritic distance, than found with either the passive or 100-0% Na+ gradient models. An interesting result of this simulation was that increased sodium conductance in the dendrite increased the onset latency of the action potential, in comparison to the passive propagation of the spike (Figure 10C, Onset Latency), presumably owing to the time required to actively generate an action potential at each dendritic compartment.
A drawback of VSD imaging is that an absolute voltage cannot be determined from the amplitude of the fluorescence signal. Creating a computer simulation that was constrained by our experimental data allowed us to predict the amplitudes of the voltage changes in the dendrites of LGNd interneurons. Action potential amplitudes, calculated from threshold, were found to decrease with distance from the soma for all conditions, although the reduction in amplitude was much less in the active than passive condition (Figure 10G, Amplitude). To assess how well the 50% to 25% conductance model fit with our dendritic experimental data, we treated the 50% to 25% and passive conditions as a replication of our TTX experiment. The relative amplitude change between the 50% to 25% and passive conditions were compared to those found experimentally between control and TTX conditions (Figure 10H, Relative Amplitude, black dots experimental, rose dots model data). We found that the relative change in amplitude determined by our model data was roughly similar, without the variation of biological results, to that found experimentally. These results further support a model in which interneuron dendrites actively propagate action potentials with a distance-dependent decay in density of sodium and potassium channels.
Discussion
Inhibitory local circuit neurons in the thalamus are among a number of cells in the brain that can release synaptic vesicles from both their axons and dendrites (Rafols and Valverde, 1973; Famiglietti, 1970; Famiglietti and Peters, 1972; Montero, 1986; Scheetz and Dubin 1994; Acuna-Goycolea et al., 2008; for review see Kennedy and Ehlers, 2011). Synaptic vesicle release from axonal boutons is typically triggered by a rapid and high increase in local [Ca2+]i initiated by an action potential. The mechanisms of release of synaptic vesicles from dendrites is also Ca2+ dependent (Isaacson, 2001; Isaacson and Strowbridge, 1998; Abraham et al., 2010; Errington et al., 2011; Zelles et al., 2006; Acuna-Goycolea et al., 2008), although it is unclear whether or not synaptic vesicle release from dendrites is as dependent upon action potentials as is axonal release, and whether or not individual dendritic branches may operate independently from the axon or other dendrites. This is particularly true for thalamic interneurons, which contain filiform appendages characterized by long (e.g. 10 µm), thin (~ 0.1 µm) dendritic stalks that separate the site of synaptic release (and reception of subthalamic or retinal presynaptic inputs) from the parent dendrite (Rafols and Valverde, 1973). Computational simulations of the electrotonic structure of thalamic interneurons have led to the hypothesis that the dendritic and axonal portions of these cells operate independently, assuming that dendrites are passive, with axosomatic action potentials causing release of GABA from axonal terminals only (Bloomfield and Sherman, 1989; Briska et al., 2003).
But, are thalamic interneuron dendrites passive? Can action potentials invade dendritic presynaptic boutons? Previous studies in thalamic interneurons suggest that somatic action potentials can propagate and cause Ca2+ transients in dendritic regions, and that this depends upon voltage gated Na+ channels (Acuna-Goycolea et al., 2008). The small diameter of these dendrites, however, precluded the direct demonstration through electrical recording that action potentials actively propagate from the somatic regions into the regions of dendritic synaptic release. Here, using high speed and high resolution VSD imaging, we demonstrate that action potentials initiated in the somatic region propagate robustly and rapidly into all regions of the dendritic arbor, including the fine appendages associated with dendritic synaptic vesicle release. This propagation was supported by voltage-gated sodium channels and TEA-sensitive potassium channels. Furthermore, action potential conduction velocity was similar to that for unmyelinated mammalian axons (Yu et al., 2008; Popovic et al., 2011; Foust et al., 2010; Andersen et al., 2000; Meeks and Mennerick, 2007; Kress et al., 2008; Schmidt-Heiber et al., 2008, for review see Debanne et al., 2011).
The ability to receive synaptic inputs, integrate them into voltage deviations at the soma/axon initial segment, and then rapidly propagate Na+ dependent action potentials at a rate typical for unmyelinated axons, and release synaptic vesicles in an action potential dependent manner indicates that these morphological processes possess functional properties between those traditionally associated with dendrites and axons. We propose the term “dendraxons” to emphasize this dual role. One important feature of these processes that is different from axonal conduction is the apparent decrease in amplitude and slowing of the kinetics of the action potential as it propagates through dendritic processes. Even so, we found that the entire dendritic arbor of local interneurons, including the fine appendages that release synaptic vesicles, will experience the action potential nearly simultaneously, within approximately 0.5 ms.
The broadening and slowing in kinetics of the action potential as it propagates into the dendrite is consistent with a linearly decaying density of voltage-activated sodium and potassium conductances with distance from the soma. These lower densities of Na+ channels may also explain why we never observed action potentials to initiate in dendritic branches, even with strong synaptic stimulation. Whenever action potential threshold was reached, spikes initiated first in the somatic or near-somatic region (presumably axonal), versus, the distal dendritic region. However, evidence suggests that dendritic release of neurotransmitter can occur without Na+ dependent action potentials. Following the block of voltage dependent Na+ currents with TTX, the activation of glutamate metabotropic receptors results in a large increase in IPSP rate in thalamocortical neurons (Cox and Sherman, 2000; Errington et al., 2011; Govindaiah and Cox, 2004; Govindaiah and Cox 2006), a result consistent with interneuronal dendritic depolarization and release of synaptic vesicles. Similarly, the initiation of prolonged Ca2+ dependent action potentials in thalamic interneurons appears to result in the prolonged release of GABAergic vesicles from these dendrites, even in the absence of Na+ dependent action potentials (Acuna-Goycolea et al., 2008).
We hypothesize that the dendritic region of thalamic interneurons operates in two different regimes, one local and one global. The local processing mode is characterized by release of GABAergic vesicles without the initiation of action potentials in the interneuron and occurs in response to local increases in [Ca2+]i resulting from synaptic potentials and the local dendritic ionic currents that they initiate. The global processing mode occurs whenever an action potential is initiated, presumably in the axon initial segment, which then propagates forward throughout the axonal arbor and back-propagates rapidly throughout dendritic arbors, resulting in the rapid and nearly simultaneous release of GABAergic vesicles from a cloud formed by dendritic and axonal presynaptic terminals of the interneuron. The robust propagation of action potentials throughout the dendritic arbor, where they cause rapid increases in [Ca2+]i (Acuna-Goycolea et al., 2008), does not support the hypothesis, based upon passive models, that thalamic interneuron dendrites are unaffected by somatic/axonal action potentials (Bloomfield and Sherman, 1989). Rather, our results agree with those based upon Ca2+ imaging studies (Acuna-Goycolea et al., 2008): Na/K action potentials invade the entire neuron, from axon to dendrite.
Excitatory synaptic inputs to thalamic interneurons arrive onto three broad categories of the soma-dendritic axis: 1) the soma and nearby dendritic trunks; 2) the dendritic knob-like structures that are attached to the dendrite, often through fine processes; 3) dendritic regions outside the fine, filiform appendages (Hamos et al., 1985; Pape and McCormick, 1995; Godwin et al., 1996; Erisir et al, 1997a; Cox and Sherman, 2000). The functional effects of excitation arriving in each of these three compartments may be considerably different from the others. In rodents, the axon of interneurons (if present) typically arises from a dendrite within approximately 20 – 50 µm of the soma (Rafols and Valverde 1973; Perrault et al., 2003). Our VSD experiments indicate that action potentials entering a dendritic branch do so from either the somatic or proximal dendritic region (< 50 µm). This result is consistent with action potentials being initiated in the axon initial segment, as in other types of neurons (Hu et al, 2010; Yu et al, 2008; Shu et al., 2007, Kole et al., 2008a, Kole et al., 2008b), followed by propagation throughout the axonal/dendritic arbor. Synaptic inputs to the soma and proximal dendrite will have a potent influence over the generation of action potentials, owing to their proximity to the axon initial segment. In contrast, inputs to the fine filiform appendages, which, in the LGNd, are typically postsynaptic to retinogeniculate inputs and presynaptic to thalamocortical dendrites, are expected to have a markedly reduced influence upon action potential initiation. It may require the simultaneous activation of several of these to initiate an action potential in the axo/somatic region. Rather, it is likely that activation of retinal synaptic inputs to these electrically remote dendritic locations will result in release of GABAergic vesicles locally, in the absence of the initiation of an action potential by the interneuron (Cox and Sherman, 2000). This is particularly true owing to the conductance mismatch for current flow from the fine filiform appendages into the parent dendrite. It should be noted however that no such conductance mismatch exists in the opposite direction: the parent dendrite is likely to generate sufficient current to fully invade the appendages with each action potential (Rall, 1977). Finally, the excitatory synapses that are positioned on the dendrite proper, outside the fine filiform appendages, such as those arriving from the cerebral cortex (Dubin and Cleland, 1977) will have the opportunity to influence both the action potential activity of the neuron, as well as the dendritic release of GABA from local dendritic sites. In this manner, these GABAergic interneurons may play multiple roles in the precise timing and gating of information flow through the thalamus.
Acknowledgements
We thank Amanda Foust, Robert Sachdev, and Markus Wolfel for reading and commenting on this manuscript and Dejan Zecevic for guidance on voltage-sensitive dye methodology. We also thank Tom Morse for expert assistance with NEURON. This work was supported by the NIH and the Kavli Institute for Neuroscience.
References
- Acuna-Goycolea C, Brenowitz SD, Regehr WG. Active dendritic conductances dynamically regulate GABA release from thalamic interneurons. Neuron. 2008;57:420–431. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.12.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Andersen P, Soleng AF, Raastad M. The hippocampal lamella hypothesis revisited. Brain Res. 2000;886:165–171. doi: 10.1016/s0006-8993(00)02991-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Antic SD. Action potentials in basal and oblique dendrites of rat neocortical pyramidal neurons. J Physiol. 2003;550:35–50. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2002.033746. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Berardi N, Morrone MC. The role of gamma-aminobutyric acid mediated inhibition in the response properties of cat lateral geniculate nucleus neurones. J Physiol. 1984;357:505–523. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1984.sp015514. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Blitz DM, Regehr WG. Timing and specificity of feed-forward inhibition within the LGN. Neuron. 2005;45:917–928. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.01.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bloomfield SA, Sherman SM. Dendritic current flow in relay cells and interneurons of the cat's lateral geniculate nucleus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989;86:3911–3914. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.10.3911. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Blunck R, Chanda B, Bezanilla F. Nano to micro -- fluorescence measurements of electric fields in molecules and genetically specified neurons. J Membr Biol. 2005;208:91–102. doi: 10.1007/s00232-005-0822-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Briska AM, Uhlrich DJ, Lytton WW. Computer model of passive signal integration based on whole-cell in vitro studies of rat lateral geniculate nucleus. Eur J Neurosci. 2003;17:1531–1541. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9568.2003.02579.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Canepari M, Djurisic M, Zecevic D. Dendritic signals from rat hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons during coincident pre- and post-synaptic activity: a combined voltage- and calcium-imaging study. J Physiol. 2007;580:463–484. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2006.125005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Christie JM, Westbrook GL. Regulation of backpropagating action potentials in mitral cell lateral dendrites by A-type potassium currents. J Neurophysiol. 2003;89:2466–2472. doi: 10.1152/jn.00997.2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cox CL, Sherman SM. Control of dendritic outputs of inhibitory interneurons in the lateral geniculate nucleus. Neuron. 2000;27:597–610. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)00069-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Debanne D, Campanac E, Bialowas A, Carlier E, Alcaraz G. Axon physiology. Physiol Rev. 2011;91:555–602. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00048.2009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Djurisic M, Antic S, Chen WR, Zecevic D. Voltage imaging from dendrites of mitral cells: EPSP attenuation and spike trigger zones. J Neurosci. 2004;24:6703–6714. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0307-04.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dubin MW, Cleland BG. Organization of visual inputs to interneurons of lateral geniculate nucleus of the cat. J Neurophysiol. 1977;40:410–427. doi: 10.1152/jn.1977.40.2.410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Erisir A, Van Horn SC, Bickford ME, Sherman SM. Immunocytochemistry and distribution of parabrachial terminals in the lateral geniculate nucleus of the cat: a comparison with corticogeniculate terminals. J. Comp. Neurol. 1997a;377:535–549. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Erisir A, Van Horn SC, Sherman SM. Relative numbers of cortical and brainstem inputs to the lateral geniculate nucleus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997b;94:1517–1520. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.4.1517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Errington AC, Di Giovanni G, Crunelli V, Cope DW. mGluR control of interneuron output regulates feedforward tonic GABAA inhibition in the visual thalamus. J Neurosci. 2011;31:8669–8680. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0317-11.2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Famiglietti EV., Jr Dendro-dendritic synapses in the lateral geniculate nucleus of the cat. Brain Res. 1970;20:181–191. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(70)90287-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Famiglietti EV, Jr, Peters A. The synaptic glomerulus and the intrinsic neuron in the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus of the cat. J Comp Neurol. 1972;144:285–334. doi: 10.1002/cne.901440304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Foust A, Popovic M, Zecevic D, McCormick DA. Action potentials initiate in the axon initial segment and propagate through axon collaterals reliably in cerebellar Purkinje neurons. J Neurosci. 2010;30:6891–6902. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0552-10.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Godwin DW, Van Horn SC, Erisir A, Sesma M, Romano C, Sherman SM. Ultrastructural localization suggests that retinal and cortical inputs access different metabotropic glutamate receptors in the lateral geniculate nucleus. J Neurosci. 1996;16:8181–8192. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.16-24-08181.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Govindaiah, Cox CL. Synaptic activation of metabotropic glutamate receptors regulates dendritic outputs of thalamic interneurons. Neuron. 2004;41:611–623. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(04)00013-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Govindaiah G, Cox CL. Metabotropic glutamate receptors differentially regulate GABAergic inhibition in thalamus. J Neurosci. 2006;26:13443–13453. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3578-06.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Grinvald A, Salzberg BM, Lev-Ram V, Hildesheim R. Optical recording of synaptic potentials from processes of single neurons using intracellular potentiometric dyes. Biophys. J. 1987;51:643–651. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(87)83389-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Guillery RW, Sherman SM. Thalamic relay functions and their role in corticocortical communication: generalizations from the visual system. Neuron. 2002;33:163–175. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(01)00582-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Grubb MS, Thompson ID. Quantitative characterization of visual response properties in the mouse dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus. J Neurophysiol. 2003;90:3594–3607. doi: 10.1152/jn.00699.2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Grubb MS, Thompson ID. Visual response properties of burst and tonic firing in the moise dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus. J Neurophysiol. 2005;93:3224–3247. doi: 10.1152/jn.00445.2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hamos JE, Van Horn SC, Raczkowski D, Uhlrich DJ, Sherman SM. Synaptic connectivity of a local circuit neurone in lateral geniculate nucleus of the cat. Nature. 1985;317:618–621. doi: 10.1038/317618a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hausser M, Stuart G, Racca C, Sakmann B. Axonal initiation and active dendritic propagation of action potentials in substantia nigra neurons. Neuron. 1995;15:637–647. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(95)90152-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hines ML, Carnevale NT. NEURON: a tool for neuroscientists. Neuroscientist. 2001;7:123–135. doi: 10.1177/107385840100700207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hoffman DA, Magee JC, Colbert CM, Johnston D. K+ channel regulation of signal propagation in dendrites of hippocampal pyramidal neurons. Nature. 1997;387:869–875. doi: 10.1038/43119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Holthoff K, Zecevic D, Konnerth A. Rapid time course of action potentials in spines and remote dendrites of mouse visual cortex neurons. J Physiol. 2010;588:1085–1096. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2009.184960. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hu H, Martina M, Jonas P. Dendritic mechanisms underlying rapid synaptic activation of fast-spiking hippocampal interneurons. Science. 2010;327:52–58. doi: 10.1126/science.1177876. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Isaacson JS, Strowbridge BW. Olfactory reciprocal synapses: dendritic signaling in the CNS. Neuron. 1998;20:749–761. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)81013-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Isaacson JS. Mechanisms governing dendritic gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) release in the rat olfactory bulb. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98:337–342. doi: 10.1073/pnas.021445798. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kennedy MJ, Ehlers MD. Mechanisms and function of dendritic exocytosis. Neuron. 69:856–875. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.02.032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Khaliq ZM, Raman IM. Relative contributions of axonal and somatic Na channels to action potential initiation in cerebellaer Purkinje neurons. J Neusosci. 2006;26:1935–1944. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4664-05.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kole MH, Ilschner SU, Kampa BM, Williams SR, Ruben PC, Stuart GJ. Action potential generation requires a high sodium channel density in the axon initial segment. Nat Neurosci. 2008a;11:178–186. doi: 10.1038/nn2040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kole MH, Stuart GJ. Is action potential threshold lowest in the axon? Nat Neurosci. 2008b:1253–1255. doi: 10.1038/nn.2203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kress GJ, Dowling MJ, Meeks JP, Mennerick S. High threshold, proximal initiation, and slow conduction velocity of action potentials in dentate granule neuron mossy fibers. J Neurophysiol. 2008;100:281–291. doi: 10.1152/jn.90295.2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ledergerber D, Larkum ME. Properties of layer 6 pyramidal neuron apical dendrites. J Neurosci. 2010;30:13031–13044. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2254-10.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mainen ZF, Joerges J, Huguenard JR, Sejnowski TJ. A model of spike initiation in neocortical pyramidal neurons. Neuron. 1995;15:1427–1439. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(95)90020-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Martina M, Vida I, Jonas P. Distal initiation and active propagation of action potentials in interneuron dendrites. Science. 2000;287:295–300. doi: 10.1126/science.287.5451.295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McCormick DA, Huguenard JR. A model of the electrophysiological properties of thalamocortical relay neurons. J Neurophysiol. 1992;68:1384–1400. doi: 10.1152/jn.1992.68.4.1384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Meeks JP, Mennerick S. Action potential initiation and propagation in CA3 pyramidal axons. J Neurophysiol. 2007;97:3460–3472. doi: 10.1152/jn.01288.2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Migliore M, Shepherd GM. Emerging rules for the distributions of active dendritic conductances. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002;3:362–370. doi: 10.1038/nrn810. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Montero VM. Localization of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) in type 3 cells and demonstration of their source to F2 terminals in the cat lateral geniculate nucleus: a Golgi-electron-microscopic GABA-immunocytochemical study. J Comp Neurol. 1986;254:228–245. doi: 10.1002/cne.902540207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nevian T, Larkum ME, Polsky A, Schiller J. Properties of basal dendrites of layer 5 pyramidal neurons: a direct patch-clamp recording study. Nat Neurosci. 2007;10:206–214. doi: 10.1038/nn1826. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Palmer LM, Clark BA, Grundermann J, Roth A, Stuart G, Hausser M. Initiation of simple and complex spikes in cerebellar Purkinje cells. J Physiol. 2010;588:1709–1717. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2010.188300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pape H-C, McCormick DA. Electrophysiological and pharmacological properties of interneurons on the cat dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus. Neuroscience. 1995;68:1105–1125. doi: 10.1016/0306-4522(95)00205-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Perreault MC, Qin Y, Heggelund P, Zhu JJ. Postnatal development of GABAergic signalling in the rat lateral geniculate nucleus: presynaptic dendritic mechanisms. J Physiol. 2003;546:137–148. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2002.030643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Popovic MA, Foust AJ, McCormick DA, Zecevic D. The spatio-temporal characteristics of action potential initiation in layer 5 pyramidal neurons: a voltage-imaging study. J Physiol. 2011:4167–4187. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2011.209015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rafols JA, Valverde F. The structure of the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus in the mouse. A Golgi and electron microscopic study. J Comp Neurol. 1973;150:303–332. doi: 10.1002/cne.901500305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rall W. Core conductor theory and cable properties of neurons. In: Kandel ER, Brookhardt JM, Mountcastle VM, editors. Handbook of physiology, cellular biology of neurons. Bethesda, MD: American Physiological Society; 1977. pp. 39–97. [Google Scholar]
- Rothman JS, Manis PB. Kinetic analyses of three distinct potassium conductances in ventral cochlear nucleus neurons. J Neurophysiol. 2003;89:3083–3096. doi: 10.1152/jn.00126.2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Salzberg BM. Current Methods in Cellular Neuroscience. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Press; 1983. Optical recording of electrical activity in neurons using molecular probes. [Google Scholar]
- Salzberg BM, Obaid AL, Bezanilla F. Microsecond response of a voltage-sensitive merocyanine dye: fast voltage-clamp measurements of squid giant axon. Jpn. J. Physiol. 1993;43 Supplement 1:S37–S41. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Scheetz AJ, Dubin MW. Cytochemical polarity in lateral geniculate interneurons. Brain Res. 1994;639:181–192. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(94)91729-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schmidt-Hieber C, Jonas P, Bischofberger J. Action potential initiation and propagation in hippocampal mossy fibre axons. J Physiol. 2008;586:1849–1857. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2007.150151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shepherd GM. Symposium overview and historical perspective: dendrodendritic synapses: past, present, and future. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009;1170:215–223. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.03937.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sherman SM. Interneurons and triadic circuitry of the thalamus. Trends Neurosci. 2004;27:670–675. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2004.08.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sherman SM, Friedlander MJ. Identification of X versus Y properties for interneurons in the A-laminae of the cat’s lateral geniculate nucleus. Exp Brain Res. 1988;73:384–392. doi: 10.1007/BF00248231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shu Y, Duque A, Yu Y, Haider B, McCormick DA. Properties of action-potential initiation in neocortical pyramidal cells: evidence from whole cell axon recordings. J Neurophysiol. 2007;97:746–760. doi: 10.1152/jn.00922.2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sillito AM, Kemp JA. The influence of GABAergic inhibitory processes on the receptive field structure of X and Y cells in cat dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus (dLGN) Brain Res. 1983;277:63–77. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(83)90908-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stuart G, Hausser M. Initiation and spread of sodium action potentials in cerebellar Purkinje cells. Neuron. 1994;13:703–712. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(94)90037-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stuart G, Schiller J, Sakmann B. Action potential initiation and propagation in rat neocortical pyramidal neurons. J Physiol. 1997;505(Pt 3):617–632. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.1997.617ba.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Waters J, Schaefer A, Sakmann B. Backpropagating action potentials in neurones: measurement, mechanisms and potential functions. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2005;87:145–170. doi: 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2004.06.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Williams SR, Stuart GJ. Action potential backpropagation and somato-dendritic distribution of ion channels in thalamocortical neurons. J Neurosci. 2000;20:1307–1317. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-04-01307.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yu Y, Shu Y, McCormick DA. Cortical action potential backpropagation explains spike threshold variability and rapid-onset kinetics. J Neurosci. 2008;28:7260–7272. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1613-08.2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zelles T, Boyd JD, Hardy AB, Delaney KR. Branch-specific Ca2+ influx from Na+-dependent dendritic spikes in olfactory granule cells. J Neurosci. 2006;26:30–40. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1419-05.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhou WL, Yan P, Wuskell JP, Loew LM, Antic SD. Dynamics of action potential backpropagation in basal dendrites of prefrontal cortical pyramidal neurons. Eur J Neurosci. 2008;27:923–936. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2008.06075.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]