Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Sep 10.
Published in final edited form as: Evolution. 2012 Mar 9;66(7):2150–2166. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01582.x

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Schematic diagrams representing all possible parental crosses and offspring genotypes for a single-construct gene drive system. A: For the autosomal case, the allele of interest is denoted by “T” and the null allele by “t,” respectively. We assume that offspring viability is gender-independent. Indices 1-14 represent the 14 ways in which offspring of different parental crosses may be rendered unviable by the construct, and correspond to constants c1,…,c14 in Equations 1-3. B: For an X-linked construct, the allele of interest is denoted by “XT” and the null allele by “Xt.” Indices 1-14 represent the 14 ways in which offspring of different parental crosses may be rendered unviable, and correspond to constants c1,…,c14 in Equations 8-12. C: For a Y-linked construct, the allele of interest is denoted by “YT” and the null allele by “Yt.” Here, there are only two ways in which offspring of different parental crosses may be rendered unviable, which correspond to the constants c1,c2 in Equations S16-S18.