Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Neurosci. 2012 Jan 25;32(4):1496–1506. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4176-11.2012

Concentration dependent requirement for local protein synthesis in motor neuron subtype specific response to axon guidance cues

Stephane Nedelec 1, Mirza Peljto 1,#, Peng Shi 4,*, Mackenzie W Amoroso 5, Lance C Kam 4, Hynek Wichterle 1,2,3
PMCID: PMC3561907  NIHMSID: NIHMS352274  PMID: 22279234

Abstract

Formation of functional motor circuits relies on the ability of distinct spinal motor neuron subtypes to project their axons with high precision to appropriate muscle targets. While guidance cues contributing to motor axon pathfinding have been identified, the intracellular pathways underlying subtype specific responses to these cues remain poorly understood. In particular, it remains controversial whether responses to axon guidance cues depend on axonal protein synthesis. Using a growth cone collapse assay, we demonstrate that mouse embryonic stem cell (ESC) derived spinal motor neurons (ES-MNs) respond to ephrin-A5, Sema3f and Sema3a in a concentration dependent manner. At low doses, ES-MNs exhibit segmental or subtype specific responses, while this selectivity is lost at higher concentrations. Response to high doses of semaphorins and to all doses of ephrin-A5 is protein synthesis independent. In contrast, using microfluidic devices and stripe assays, we show that growth cone collapse and guidance at low concentrations of semaphorins relies on local protein synthesis in the axonal compartment. Similar bimodal response to low and high concentrations of guidance cues is observed in human ES-MNs, pointing to a general mechanism by which neurons increase their repertoire of responses to the limited set of guidance cues involved in neural circuit formation.

Introduction

Function of the nervous system depends on the formation of precise neural circuits. Specificity of neuronal connections is well illustrated in the motor system, where individual axons emanating from hundreds of spinal motor neuron subtypes follow prescribed trajectories to innervate defined muscle groups (Dasen and Jessell, 2009). In vivo and in vitro studies established that two families of repulsive guidance cues - secreted semaphorins and ephrins - play a crucial role in motor axon navigation (Fig.1A and B) (Bonanomi and Pfaff, 2010). However, limited access to primary motor neurons prevented detailed molecular analysis of intracellular pathways underlying subtype specific responses of motor axons to guidance cues.

Figure 1. Growth cone collapse assay as a tool to study the response of ESC derived motor neuron axons to repulsive guidance cues.

Figure 1

(A –B ) Schematic representation of spinal motor neuron projections at brachial and cervical/thoracic level of the spinal cord. MMC: Medial Motor Column, LMC: Lateral Motor Column. LMCl : lateral subdivision of the LMC. LMCm: medial subdivision of the LMC. HMC: Hypaxial Motor Column. Guidance cues and receptors previously implicated in motor neuron subtype specific axon guidance are indicated. Brachio-thoracic (C) and cervical (D) ES-MNs show profuse axon outgrowth on laminin substrate (Scale bar 80 μm). (E) Typical growth cones observed at the tip of ES-MN axons (cervical) (scale bar 15 μm). (F) Following exposure to ephrin-A5 growth cone collapse leading to the disappearance of filopodia and lamellipodia and the formation of a retraction bulb (scale bar 15 μm). (G) Growth cones of brachio-thoracic and cervical motor axons collapse efficiently when exposed to ephrin-a5 (n=5). Two way-Anova with post-hoc analysis *** = P<0.001, n.s. = no significance, error bar: STD).

In the past years, pharmacological studies established that axonal protein translation is a key component of axon guidance, necessary for the attraction and repulsion of growth cones by multiple guidance molecules (Jung and Holt, 2011). However, these studies were recently challenged by a report concluding that responses to guidance cues do not require local protein synthesis (Roche et al., 2009). Several parameters might contribute to the reported discrepancy. First, dissection of primary neurons from embryos often leads to axon injury and to subsequent changes in axonal mRNA transport and translation (Gumy et al., 2010). Therefore, differential handling of tissue after dissection might influence whether local protein synthesis is involved during axon guidance. Second, different concentrations of guidance cues might elicit qualitatively different growth cone collapse programs, only some of which might be dependent on local protein synthesis (Li et al., 2004; Brown et al., 2009; Jaffrey, 2009).

Here we employed an embryonic stem cell (ESC) based system that provides virtually unlimited source of spinal motor neurons (ES-MNs) (Wichterle et al., 2002; Peljto et al., 2010) to examine motor neuron subtype specificity of axon guidance responses and its dependence on protein synthesis. Unlike primary motor neurons whose axons are often injured during dissection, ES-MNs plated as embryoid bodies never undergo axotomy. Furthermore, ESCs can be differentiated into distinct motor neuron subtypes which upon implantation in the developing chick neural tube exhibit subtype specific axon pathfinding comparable to in vivo motor neurons (Peljto et al., 2010). In vitro generated ES-MNs might thus represent a valuable and powerful tool for systematic pharmacological and biochemical study of axon guidance (Soundararajan et al., 2010). Here we demonstrate that in vitro cultured ES-MNs, which were never exposed to the embryonic environment, acquire expected subtype specific responsiveness to guidance cues. We show that these responses are concentration dependent and only the response to low concentrations of semaphorins is dependent on axonal protein synthesis. Therefore, ES-MNs can serve as a pharmacologically and biochemically accessible system to define motor neuron subtype specific signal transduction pathways activated in response to varying concentration of guidance cues.

Materials and Methods

Embryonic stem cell culture and differentiation

To generate cervical motor neurons, differentiation of ESCs (HBG3 male ES line) under retinoic acid (RA) and Hedgehog agonist (Hh) conditions was performed as previously described (Wichterle et al., 2002). Brachio-thoracic motor neurons were obtained by differentiation of ESC under conditions relying on endogenous sources of caudalizing and ventralizing signals (CV differentiation) as described in (Peljto et al., 2010). ES derived human motor neurons were differentiated from the HuES-3-Hb9:GFP ESC line (male ES line) as described in (Boulting et al., 2011).

Collapse assays

Six to seven embryoid bodies at day 6 of differentiation were plated on Poly-Ornithine (20 μg/ml, o/n at 37 °C), laminin (5 μg/ml, 2h at 37 °C) coated coverslips in 50% ADMEM/F12, 50% Neurobasal, supplemented with N2 (Invitrogen). After 16 hours, Sema3a-Fc, Sema3f-Fc, ephrin-A5-Fc, Bmp4 (R&D systems) or retinoic acid (RA, Sigma) were applied in the culture medium. To block protein synthesis, cycloheximide (10 μM) was added 5 min prior addition of the cues. To block the interaction between Neuropilin-1 (Nrp1) and Sema3a, an anti-Nrp1 antibody (AF 566, R&D system) was added 30 min prior Sema3a addition. Cells were fixed with a pre-warmed (37°C) solution of 4% paraformaldehyde containing 10% sucrose. Coverslips were mounted and the collapse rate of GFP positive axons was assessed using a 40X objective. 90 to 300 growth cones were counted per condition. To assess the specific collapse rate of LMC axons, fixed embryoid bodies were stained with rabbit anti-RALDH2 antibody (Sockanathan and Jessell, 1998) and a donkey anti-rabbit Cy3 (1/1500) secondary antibody (Jackson Immunoresearch). Human motor neurons were stained for GFP (rabbit anti-GFP, Invitrogen) and F-actin (Phalloidin Alexa-594, Invitrogen). Collapse rate was then assessed as mentioned above. A minimum of 3 independent experiments were performed per condition. Percentages are means between experiments. Error bars represent the standard deviations between replicates. Statitical analysis were performed using one-way or two-way ANOVA followed by post hoc analysis (SigmaPlot software).

Collapse assays in Microfluidic chambers

Microfluidic chambers (Shi et al., 2010) were assembled on glass coverslips. Glass was coated sequentially with poly-ornithine (20 μg/ml – 1h at 37°C) and laminin (7 μg/ml - 2h at 37C). Embryoid bodies differentiated into motor neurons were placed in the cell body compartment of the chamber and cultured for 24 hours in 50% ADMEM/F12, 50 % Neurobasal, supplemented with B27 (Invitrogen).To provide optimal trophic support for motor neurons without interfering with the response to guidance cues, the medium on the cell body side of the chamber is supplemented with growth factors (final concentration: GDNF 5 ng/ml, BDNF 5 ng/ml , HGF 5 ng/ml, CNTF 5 ng/ml). 20 min prior to the addition of Sema3a or Sema3f, 10 μM cycloheximide or DMSO are added on the axon side of the chamber.

Microfluidic chambers and micropatterning

Stripe assays in microfluidic chambers were performed as described in (Shi et al., 2010). Briefly, Protein A stripes are patterned on glass coverslips using a stamping method. Microfluidic chambers were applied on the coverslip, aligned with the stripes. A 3% fetal bovine serum, 3% BSA solution containing 10 μg/ml Sema3f-Fc in PBS was applied to the Protein-A stripes for 30 min then washed thoroughly with PBS. Coverslips were then coated with poly-Ornithine and laminin as described above. Cultures of ES-MNs are performed as described above. 16hours after plating of the cells 10 μM cycloheximide (Wichterle et al., 2002; Peljto et al., 2010) or DMSO are added in the axon compartment and neurons are cultured for additional 8 hours before being fixed and processed for imaging.

Quantification of stripe assays

GFP intensity was measured in abutting windows of equivalent size, one covering the Sema3f stripe and another one in the adjacent laminin stripe. The ratio of the two signals determines the “guidance” index. For each condition, 8 stripes in two independent chambers have been analyzed (16 stripes per conditions). Statistical analyses were performed using t-test.

Fluorescent in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry on dissociated ES-MNs

Dissociated ES-MNs were plated on glass coverslips (5000 cells/cm2) and cultured overnight. Cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min at room temperature washed three times with phosphate buffer saline (PBS) and processed for immunostaining or in situ hybridization (ISH). ISH were performed as described in (Batish et al., 2011). Briefly 48 individual TAMRA single-labeled 20mer oligonucleotides complementary to mouse Slit2, and β-actin mRNA sequence were designed as described in (Raj et al., 2008) and obtained from Biosearch Technologies (Novato, CA, USA). Cells were then processed for ISH.

For the detection of P ribosomal proteins and eIF4E, fixed cells were incubated with a human autoantibody against P0,P1, P3 ribosomal proteins (generous gift of Dr. Morris Reichlin), a rabbit anti-eIF4E antibody (Ab 9742, cell signaling) at 4°C overnight. Cy3 goat anti-human IgG or anti-rabbit secondary antibodies (Jackson immunoreasearch) were used to visualize the immunostaining.

Quantification of Phospho-4EBP1 following exposure to guidance cues

3 to 4 min after addition of the guidance cues in the culture medium; the cells were fixed and processed for immunostaining as described above with a rabbit anti-P-4EBP1 (Ab 2855, cell signaling). The intensity of P-4EBP1 signal was measured in 20 growth cones (ten growth cones per experiment in two independent experiments) and normalized to GFP signal. Statistical analyses were performed using one-way ANOVA on ranks.

Results

ES-MN axons respond to biologically relevant guidance cues

The formation of precise neuronal connections relies on the differential interpretation of guidance cues by related groups of neurons innervating distinct targets. ESCs can be differentiated into subtypes of motor neurons appropriately innervating their expected targets in vivo (Yohn et al., 2008; Peljto et al., 2010)RA/HH treatment generates primarily cervical motor neurons of median motor column (MMC) and hypaxial motor column (HMC) identities (Fig. 1A-B) (Wichterle et al., 2002). Differentiation under CV condition generates more posterior brachio-thoracic motor neurons, including limb innervating lateral motor column (LMC) ES-MNs (Fig. 1A and B) (Peljto et al., 2010).

We took advantage of ES-MN subtype diversity to determine whether in vitro generated neurons acquire ability to respond to guidance cues independent of transplantation into the embryonic spinal cord. Growth cone collapse assay is a simple and quantitative method to assess cervical and brachio-thoracic ES-MN responses to guidance molecules. On day 5-6 of differentiation (equivalent of mouse embryonic day 9.5-10.5), ES-MNs undergo a period of active axon outgrowth when plated on permissive substrate (Fig. 1C and D). Motor axons exhibit well elaborated growth cones (Fig. 1E) that can be specifically identified by the expression of GFP under the control of the motor neuron specific Hb9 promoter (Wichterle et al., 2002). First, we determined by time-lapse microscopy the kinetics of ES-MNs response to ephrin-A5, a chemorepulsive cue previously implicated in the guidance of motor axons in vivo and shown to induce motor neuron growth cone collapse in vitro (Ohta et al., 1997; Eberhart et al., 2000; Helmbacher et al., 2000; Kania et al., 2000; Marquardt et al., 2005; Gallarda et al., 2008; Kao and Kania, 2011). At 300 ng/ml ephrin-A5, a concentration of ephrin-A used in previous studies (Marquardt et al., 2005; Gallarda et al., 2008), we observed that nearly all ES-MN growth cones collapsed and axon shafts retracted in 15 to 20 minutes (data not shown and Fig. 1F). Ephrin-A5 (300ng/ml) induces a strong collapse response of both cervical and brachio-thoracic ES-MNs growth cones (84.1% and 79.4% respectively p<0.001- Fig. 1G). Based on these observations we concluded that 20 min growth cone collapse assay can be used to assess responsiveness of cervical or brachio-thoracic ES-MNs to relevant guidance cues.

Subtype specific response of ES-MNs to ephrin-A5

Are ES-MNs correctly programmed and able to respond to guidance cues according to their subtype identity? Close to 40% of brachio-thoracic ES-MNs are limb innervating LMC motor neurons. The vast majority of these LMC ES-MNs are of LMCm identity predicted to project their axons to the ephrin-As rich ventral limb (Fig. 1B) (Eberhart et al., 2000; Kania and Jessell, 2003; Peljto et al., 2010). LMCm ES-MNs should be largely resistant to ephrin-A5 induced collapse while non-LMC neurons should be responsive (Kania et al., 2000; Marquardt et al., 2005; Gallarda et al., 2008; Kao and Kania, 2011).

To examine subtype specific guidance, we first developed methods to distinguish LMC and non-LMC motor axons. We observed that while LMC marker Foxp1 marks only nuclei of neurons (Fig. 2A), RALDH2 is co-expressed with Foxp1 in LMC ES-MNs and can be traced to distal axons in vivo (Fig. 2B and (Sockanathan and Jessell, 1998)) and in vitro (Fig. 2C). Therefore, RALDH2 staining provides a reliable way to distinguish between LMC and non-LMC growth cones.

Figure 2. Motor neuron subtype specific, protein synthesis independent response to ephrin-A5.

Figure 2

(A) RALDH2 is expressed by ES-derived LMC motor neurons ((Foxp1+; Hb9+) – Arrow) and not by other motor neuron subtypes ((Foxp1; Hb9+) – Arrow head). (Scale bar: 10 μm) (B) Immunostaining on mouse embryo section (E12.5) for RALDH2 (Red) shows that the enzyme specifically labels LMC axons projecting toward the forelimb but is not present in other motor branches. (SC : Spinal Cord - DRG: Dorsal Root Ganglia – LMC : Lateral Motor Column - Limb Br. : Limb axonal branch (LMC axons) – Axial Br.: Axial axonal branch. scale bar : 100 μm. (C) RALDH2 is observed in a subset of axons growing from ES-derived brachio-thoracic motor neurons plated on laminin substrate. (D) ephrin-A5 at 50 ng/ml induces preferentially the collapse of non-LMC motor axons (HB9-GFP+ / RALDH2 axons) compare to LMC axons (HB9-GFP+ / RALDH2+ axons) (n=3) while 300 ng/ml leads to similar collapse of both populations. (Scale bar: 15 μm). (E) Dose-response of brachio-thoracic ES-MNs to ephrin-A5 in absence or presence of cycloheximide. All significantly active concentrations of ephrin-A5 (starting at 30 ng/ml ; n=3) induce collapse in a protein synthesis independent manner. (Two-way ANOVA, n.s. = no significance, error bar: STD).

At ephrin-A5 concentration previously used to induce growth cone collapse (300 ng/ml), we did not detect a differential response between LMC and non-LMC axons (Fig. 2D). We reasoned that subtype specific response might be revealed only at lower concentrations of guidance cues as demonstrated for retinal ganglion cells (RGC) (Petros et al., 2010). We thus exposed brachio-thoracic neurons to different concentrations of ephrin-As and determined their dose response curve (Fig. 2D and 2E). At submaximal dose of ephrin-A5 (50 ng/ml) we observed preferential collapse of non-LMC axons (73.4 % of non-RADLH2 axons ; p<0.001) while LMC axons collapsed at a significantly lower rate (52.8 % of RADLH2 + ; axons; p<0.05) (Fig. 2D).

These observations demonstrate that Ephrin-A5 induces a subtype specific collapse response of ES-MN axons but this specificity is eroded at high concentration of the guidance cue.

Ephrin-A5 dependent collapse is protein synthesis independent

Provided that ES-MNs can be used to study specific responses to guidance molecules we decided to interrogate intracellular pathways important for axon pathfinding by focusing initially on the controversial role of local protein synthesis (Roche et al., 2009). First, we examined whether components of the translational machinery are present in ES-MNs. We detected immunoreactivity for P ribosomal proteins (Fig. 3 A) and the translation initiation factor eIF4E (Fig. 3B and C) in cervical and brachio-thoracic motor axons and growth cones in both RALDH2 positive and negative axons.

Figure 3. Axons of ES-MNs contain components of the translation machinery and β-actin mRNAs.

Figure 3

Immunocytochemistry revealed the presence of ribosomal P proteins and the translation initiation factor eIF4E in ES-derived motor neuron axons (A, A’ and B, B’ - cervical ES-MNs; C – brachio-thoracic ES-MNs). Many motor axons also contain β-actin mRNAs as revealed by in situ hybridization with a mixture of TAMRA labeled oligo-probes while Slit2 mRNA is observed in cell bodies but not in axons (D and E - cervical ES-MNs). Scale bars: 20 μm.

In addition, we confirmed the presence of axonally transported β-actin mRNA (Bassell et al., 1998) in a subset of cervical and brachio-thoracic motor axons (Fig. 3D and not shown) (Rossoll et al., 2003) while Slit2 mRNAs (Fig. 3E) is not detected in the axonal compartment of these neurons. Thus, ES-derived motor axons contain key components of the translational machinery suggesting that growth cone responses to guidance cues might engage this system.

To examine the role of protein synthesis in ephrin-A mediated axon collapse, we performed collapse assays on motor axons pretreated with protein synthesis inhibitor cycloheximide (10 μM) five minutes before the addition of ephrin-A5. We observed that neither the high concentration of ephrin-A5 that collapsed majority of growth cones, nor the low concentration that elicited subtype specific collapse depended on protein synthesis (Fig. 2E). In conclusion, ephrin-A5 induced motor neuron growth cone collapse does not appear to require newly synthetized proteins.

Concentration dependent response of cervical and brachio-thoracic ES-MNs to Sema3a

To determine whether ES-MN collapse is generally protein synthesis independent we investigated motor axon behavior upon application of secreted semaphorins. Sema3a and Sema3f control motor axon fasciculation and guidance in vivo and in vitro (Fig1A-B) (Cohen et al., 2005; Huber et al., 2005; Moret et al., 2007; Haupt and Huber, 2008; Haupt et al., 2010; Huettl et al., 2011) and the dependence of Sema3a response on local protein synthesis has been extensively documented (Campbell and Holt, 2001; Li et al., 2004; Piper et al., 2005; Wu et al., 2005; Li et al., 2009).

Dose response of cervical and brachio-thoracic ES-MNs to Sema3a revealed that while both subtypes respond to high concentration (900 ng/ml) of Sema3a, brachio-thoracic ES-MNs were significantly more sensitive to Sema3a at 300 ng/ml (68.2 % brachial-thoracic. vs. 42.3% cervical.; p<0.01) (Fig. 4A). We examined whether this differential response was due to an increased sensitivity of limb-innervating motor neurons to Sema3a. We exposed brachio-thoracic ES-MNs to 300 ng/ml Sema3a and determine the collapse rate of RALDH2+ (LMC) and RALDH2 axons. Interestingly, both populations of axons responded equally well (not shown) suggesting that higher sensitivity of limb level brachial ES-MNs to Sema3a represents a segmental difference between cervical and brachial motor neurons. Similar segmental difference in Sema3a responsiveness has been previously reported between primary lumbar and thoracic motor neurons (Cohen et al., 2005).

Figure 4. Concentration dependent and subtype specific requirement for local protein synthesis during growth cone collapse in response to semaphorins.

Figure 4

(A) 300 ng/ml of Sema3a induces a strong collapse of Brachio-thoracic ES-MN growth cones while cervical remain largely insensitive (n=4). At 900 ng/ml of Sema3a both populations respond equally well (n=4; Two way-Anova with post-hoc analysis. Error bar: STD). (B) Translation inhibitor cycloheximide significantly decreases the collapse response of brachio-thoracic motor axons at 100 ng/ml and 300 ng/ml of Sema3a (n=4) but not at 900 ng/ml (n=4; Two way-Anova with post-hoc analysis. Error bar: STD). (C) ES-MNs growth cone can adapt to high concentration of Sema3a. At 900 ng/ml of Sema3a the rate of collapsed growth cone is back to control level after 3 hours. T-test versus ctr). (D-G’) 4EBP-1staining in brachio-thoracic and cervical ES-MNs growth cones upon addition of Sema3a at low (300 ng/ml) or high concentration (900 ng/ml). Scale bar: 10 μm. (H). Relative fluorescence of 4EBP-1 (normalized to GFP) in cervical or brachial ES-MNs growth cones upon Sema3a or Sema3f at low (300 ng/ml) or high concentration (900 ng/ml) (one-way ANOVA on ranks; Error bar: SEM). (I) Cycloheximide does not affect the collapse response of cervical motor axons at 900 ng/ml Sema3a (n=4). (J) Cycloheximide significantly decreases the collapse response of cervical motor axons at 100 ng/ml and 300 ng/ml Sema3f but not 900 ng/ml (n=4). Error bar: STD. *= p<0.05 ** = p<0.01, *** = P<0.001, n.s. = no significance.

Protein synthesis dependent and independent collapse in response to Sema3a

Having established the dose response of ES-MNs to Sema3a we tested its dependence on protein synthesis. Inhibition of protein synthesis had little effect on the collapse of brachio-thoracic motor neuron growth cones under the high (900 ng/ml) concentration of Sema3a but significantly attenuated the collapse in response to lower concentrations (at 300 ng/ml : 73.4 % vs. 56.7 % p<0.01 and at 100 ng/ml : 68.2 % vs. 48.4 % p<0.001) (Fig. 4B). These observations indicate that synthesis of new proteins is required for growth cone collapse at low concentration of Sema3a. However, high concentration of Sema3a appears to activate qualitatively distinct signal transduction pathway that does not rely on protein synthesis. We were however concerned that the high Sema3a concentration might trigger non-physiological growth cone collapse due to its potential toxicity. We therefore examined whether long-term exposure of motor axons to 900 ng/ml of Sema3a will result in irreversible growth cone collapse, axon retraction or even death of spinal motor neurons. Not only that we did not observe significant loss of motor neurons after 16 hour treatment with high Sema3a concentration (data not shown), but within 3 hours many axons became de-sensitized, recovered and elaborated growth cones to a degree comparable to control cultures (Fig. 4C). Furthermore pre-incubation of motor neurons with an Nrp1 blocking antibody fully abolished the collapse response to high Sema3a (not shown). Together these results indicate that growth cone collapse in response to high concentration of Sema3a is not due to overall toxicity. Instead, low and high concentrations are engaging different signaling pathways to induce growth cone collapse of brachio-thoracic motor neurons.

Cervical ES-MNs lack protein synthesis dependent response to low Sema3a

Lower sensitivity of cervical ES-MNs to Sema3a might be due to the absence of the protein synthesis dependent pathway necessary to transmit low Sema3a signal. Alternatively both pathways might be still present but due to lower responsiveness, cervical ES-MNs might require higher concentration of Sema3a to respond in a protein synthesis dependent manner. To distinguish these two scenarios, we first determined whether low Sema3a concentration can activate the translation machinery in ES-MN axons. A key step in translation activation is the phosphorylation of 4E-BP1 which disrupts the interaction between 4E-BP1 and the cap binding protein eIF4E. Axonal phosphorylation of 4E-BP1 increases upon exposure to guidance cues in protein synthesis dependent guidance events (Campbell and Holt, 2001). Brachial and cervical ES-MNs were thus exposed to low Sema3a concentration fixed and stained for P-4EBP1. Low concentration of Sema3a increased phospho-4E-BP1 (P-4E-BP1) compare to control (0.21+/− 0.023 vs 0.36 +/−0.06; p<0.05 - Fig. 4E and H) in brachial but not cervical motor neurons (0.24+/− 0.02 - Fig. 5F and H). Application of high concentration of Sema3a (900 ng/ml) on cervical ES-MNs tends to increase P-4E-BP1 but the difference with the control condition was not significant mostly due to a greater variability in P-4EBP-1between growth cones (Fig 4G and H). This observation suggests that cervical ES-MNs do not significantly activate local protein synthesis in response to Sema3a.

We then examined whether local protein synthesis is required for the collapse response of cervical motor axons to the higher doses of Sema3a. We observed that treatment of cultures with cycloheximide did not attenuate significantly growth cone collapse elicited by 900 ng/ml of Sema3a (Fig. 4I). Therefore, despite a tendency to stimulate translation, high Sema3a recruits asignaling pathway downstream of Nrp1 which causes growth cone collapse independently of the synthesis of new proteins.

Sema3f elicits protein synthesis dependent growth cone collapse

In contrast to Sema3a, both cervical and brachio-thoracic motor neurons exhibit similar sensitivity to Sema3f treatment (not shown). We took advantage of this response to examine whether the absence of protein synthesis dependent signaling guidance pathway at low semaphorin concentration is a general property of cervical motor neurons. In contrast to Sema3a, Sema3f increased P-4EBP-1 in cervical ES-MNs growth cones (Fig 4H). In addition, we observed that collapse of cervical motor axon induced by Sema3f at low and medium concentration is protein synthesis dependent (attenuated by cycloheximide, p<0.001) but becomes insensitive to cycloheximide treatment under higher concentrations, mimicking the effects of Sema3a on brachio-thoracic motor neurons (Fig. 4J). Thus, cervical motor neurons are capable to engage protein synthesis pathway in response to low concentration of guidance cue, but selectively lack the high affinity signal transduction cascade linking low concentration of Sema3a to the protein translation machinery. Therefore low and high concentrations of Sema3a and Sema3f engage two distinct (protein synthesis dependent and independent) signal transduction pathways both leading to growth cone collapse.

Concentration dependent pathways are conserved in human motor neurons

Protein synthesis requirement for guidance cue response has been demonstrated in several species including xenopus, mouse and rat (Campbell and Holt, 2001; Li et al., 2004; Wu et al., 2005). ES-MN system provides a unique opportunity to study axon guidance of human motor neurons, which are otherwise inaccessible to experimentation. Human ES-MNs derived under RA/Hh condition (Li et al., 2005; Boulting et al., 2011) contain a sizable population of Foxp1 LMC neurons resembling the composition of mouse brachio-thoracic ES-MNs (Fig. 5A and (Patani et al., 2011) . When plated on laminin substrate, human ES-MNs extend axons terminated by well elaborated growth cones (Fig. 5B). Growth cone collapse assay revealed that human ES-MNs respond to both low (300 ng/ml; p<0.001) and high (900 ng/ml; p<0.001) concentration of Sema3a and only the response to low Sema3a is attenuated by the protein synthesis inhibitor cycloheximide (62.7% vs. 43.6% p<0.01) (Fig. 6C).

Figure 5. Bimodal response of human ES-MNs to Sema3a.

Figure 5

(A) Human ES-derived motor neurons (Hb9-GFP) differentiated upon RA and HH treatment acquire LMC (GFP+, Foxp1+ - arrows) and non-LMC identity (GFP+). (B) Human ES-MNs grown on laminin demonstrate elaborated growth cones with F-actin rich filopodia (phalloidin staining in red). (C) Human ES-MNs are responsive to Sema3a. Growth cone collapse in response to 300 ng/ml Sema3a is protein synthesis dependent (significantly attenuated by cycloheximide,; n=2) while response to 900 ng/ml is protein-synthesis independent (Two way-Anova with post-hoc analysis *= p<0.05 ** = p<0.01, *** = P<0.001, n.s. = no significance, error bar: STD). Scale bars :10 μm

Figure 6. Axonal protein synthesis is required for semaphorin-mediated collapse and guidance.

Figure 6

(A) Graphic representation of a microfluidic chamber. Differentiated embryoid bodies are plated in one compartment of the chamber. Axons grow through microchannels and enter the “axonal compartment” – see also Shi et al, 2010. (B) Sema3a induced collapse of brachio-thoracic motor axons and Sema3f induced collapse of cervical motor axons are attenuated when cycloheximide is applied to the axonal compartment of the microfluidic chamber. (C-C’) Micropatterned Sema3f stripes (red) are avoided by cervical motor axons, but treatment of axons with cycloheximide attenuates Sema3f avoidance (D-D’) (scale bars : 40 μm). (E) The repulsion index is calculated as a ratio of GFP intensity in two adjacent regions of interest of identical size – one covering the laminin stripe (solid yellow line in C) and the second covering the Sema3f stripe (dash yellow line in C). The repulsion mediated by Sema3f (index 1.53) is significantly (t-test t-test p< 0.001) attenuated by cycloheximide treatment (index 1.088) (n=16 stripes/condition).

Together these results demonstrate that response to guidance cues as well as signaling pathways can be studied in human motor neurons and that concentration dependent protein synthesis mediated collapse is a conserved mechanism for motor axon guidance.

Motor neuron response to Sema3a and Sema3f requires local protein synthesis in axons

Several studies provided strong evidence that protein synthesis recruited during the response to guidance cues is executed locally within distal axons or growth cones (Campbell and Holt, 2001; Ming et al., 2002; Wu et al., 2005; Hengst et al., 2009). The in vitro system offered an opportunity to determine whether the relatively rapid (20 minutes) collapse of growth cones in response to semaphorins depends on local protein synthesis in motor axons. We used microfluidic chambers in which distal segments (>250 μm from cell body) of mouse ES-MN axons and growth cones can be biochemically isolated from cell bodies (Shi et al., 2010). We observed that application of cycloheximide to the axonal compartment significantly attenuated the collapse of brachio-thoracic growth cones to low concentrations of Sema3a as well as the response of cervical growth cones to Sema3f (Fig. 6B). Therefore, axonal protein synthesis is required for growth cone collapse.

Growth cone collapse assay is a simplified method to examine responses of neurons to guidance cues. To determine whether local protein synthesis might be important for more natural form of axon pathfinding we combined the microfluidic system with stripe assays. To quantify response of axons to patterned stripes we calculated a “guidance index” as a ratio of motor axons growing on laminin and on adjacent patterned stripe. When ES-MNs are cultured on stripes made of control Fc proteins the guidance index is close to 1 (0.98+/− 0.09), data not shown) indicating that axons exhibit little pathfinding preference. In contrast, ES-MN axons exhibit strong repulsion to micropatterned Sema3f (guidance index 1.53 +/− 0.31) (Fig. 6 C-E). Interestingly when axonal compartment is treated with cycloheximide, ES-MN axons lose their sensitivity to Sema3f and the guidance index is significantly decreased to 1.088 +/− 0.2 (p<0.001) (Fig 6 D and E). These results suggest that even the contact guidance of motor axons along semaphorin territories relies on local protein synthesis dependent pathway.

Discussion

In this study, we established ES-MNs as a robust and convenient system to model and study motor axon subtype specific responses and axon guidance mechanisms. We demonstrate that i) in vitro cultured ES-MNs acquire competence to respond to developmentally relevant guidance cues; ii) the responses are motor neuron subtype specific; iii) the subtype specific responses depend on the concentration of guidance cues; and iv) responses to low and high concentration of semaphorins rely on qualitatively distinct intracellular processes. Thus, ES-MNs can be utilized for pharmacological and biochemical analysis of molecular mechanisms engaged in subtype specific axon guidance.

ES-MNs as a tool to study motor axon guidance

Several lines of evidence support our conclusion that ES-MNs acquire axon guidance properties and specificity analogous to in vivo motor neurons. Using growth cone collapse assay, we established that ES-MNs possess a differential sensitivity to guidance cues according to their columnar identity. Among the subtypes of ES-MNs generated at brachio-thoracic level, non-LMC motor neurons respond more efficiently to ephrin-A5 compared to LMC neurons. This is consistent with the observation that majority of LMC neurons generated under this condition are of LMCm divisional subtype that is guided by type B but not type A ephrins in vivo (Luria et al., 2008; Peljto et al., 2010). Furthermore, we determined that brachio-thoracic ES-MNs are more sensitive to Sema3a compared to cervical ES-MNs. Cohen and colleagues observed that primary lumbar motor neurons are more sensitive to Sema3a than thoracic ones (Cohen et al., 2005). These results raise the possibility that higher sensitivity to Sema3a is a general property of limb-level motor neurons. Indeed, Sema3a has been implicated in the controlled ingrowth of motor axons into the developing limb territory in vivo (Huber et al, 2005). Together, these results demonstrate that in vitro generated motor neurons acquire receptors and signal transduction machinery necessary for differential responsiveness to guidance cues with well-defined roles in motor axon pathfinding in vivo (Eberhart et al., 2000; Helmbacher et al., 2000; Kania et al., 2000; Huber et al., 2005; Marquardt et al., 2005; Gallarda et al., 2008; Haupt et al., 2010; Huettl et al., 2011; Kao and Kania, 2011; Wang et al., 2011). Finally, derivation of human motor neurons from ES or induced pluripotent stem cells (Li et al., 2005; Dimos et al., 2008; Boulting et al., 2011), provides the first robust platform to study axon guidance preference of human motor neurons. Understanding molecular mechanisms underlying human motor system wiring might prove invaluable for the development of effective cell replacement therapies for motor neuron diseases.

Local protein synthesis-dependent and -independent responses to guidance cues

Local protein synthesis has been shown to be necessary for growth cone response to attractive and repulsive cues (including netrin-1, Sema3a, Slit2, Bdnf, Ngf, En-2, ephrin-As, PACAP) in DRG, RGC, hippocampal neurons and sympathetic neurons (Andreassi et al.; Campbell and Holt, 2001; Ming et al., 2002; Guirland et al., 2003; Li et al., 2004; Brunet et al., 2005; Wu et al., 2005; Piper et al., 2006; Willis et al., 2007; Cox et al., 2008; Hengst et al., 2009; Li et al., 2009; Wizenmann et al., 2009). Roche and colleagues recently challenged this notion by demonstrating that Sema3a, ephrin-A2, Slit3 and Sema6a can induce collapse of DRG, retinal or sympathetic neuron growth cones in the presence of translation inhibitors (Roche et al., 2009). We therefore performed a detailed analysis of ES-MN growth cone collapse responses and found that while protein synthesis is dispensable for ephrin-A5 triggered growth cone collapse (Mann et al., 2003; Roche et al., 2009; Nie et al., 2010), low concentrations of Sema3f and Sema3a induce a local protein synthesis dependent collapse.

Importantly, our study revealed that the requirement for protein synthesis is strictly dependent on the concentration of guidance cue tested. At higher concentrations of Sema3a or Sema3f (900 ng/ml) the triggered growth cone collapse is protein synthesis independent. In their study, Roche et al. tested the responses to Sema3a at a single relatively high concentration (500 ng/ml). Thus, our findings might provide a rational explanation for the reported lack of protein synthesis dependence in Sema3a mediated growth cone collapse. In summary, our study reveals that molecular mechanisms engaged during growth cone collapse depend on three important factors: the type of guidance cue, its concentration, and the precise subtype of examined neurons. Furthermore, our observation that ES-MNs when plated as embryoid bodies (i.e. with intact, uninjured axons) show a protein synthesis response to guidance cues rules out the possibility that only regenerating axons require local protein synthesis to respond to extracellular stimuli.

Bimodal response of motor axons to guidance cues

We found that low concentration and high concentration of semaphorins induce qualitatively distinct signaling pathways in responding growth cones. The induction of different signaling pathways depending on cue concentration has been previously demonstrated in other systems but was not reported for axon guidance molecules. For example Wnt3A induces Wnt canonical and non-canonical pathways in primary human articular chondrocytes depending on its concentrations (Nalesso et al., 2011). Similarly, low and high EGF concentrations regulate distinct cellular outputs through the induction of different signaling cascades downstream of EGF receptor in breast cancer cells and mammary epithelial cells (Sigismund et al., 2008; Krall et al., 2011). The ability of growth cones to differentially interpret low and high concentrations of guidance cues might be critical for proper axon pathfinding in a complex embryonic environment. Axon guidance is a highly dynamic process during which growth cones constantly adjust their responsiveness to attractive or repulsive signals. This ensures that axons maintain optimal sensitivity to local changes in guidance cue concentration. We found that at low concentration of cues ES-MNs respond in a subtype selective manner but this specificity is eroded at higher concentrations. We can speculate that high level of cues might be encountered by growth cones that veered off their normal path into non-permissive territory. General growth cone collapse response under such circumstances might be primarily responsible for motor axon fasciculation and restricted growth along defined nerve trajectories. Indeed, defects in fasciculation are prominent features of Nrp1 or Nrp2 null mice and affect most motor nerves irrespective of motor neuron subtype identity (Huber et al., 2005). In contrast, the low concentration response might be necessary for the discrimination of subtle differences in the guidance cue levels at branchpoints and therefore might be critical for the ultimate subtype specific axon navigation to correct synaptic targets. The existence of a bimodal response to guidance cues might be a general property of all nerve cells. In agreement, Manns et al. (personal communication) have determined that exposure of DRG growth cones to low concentration of Sema3a activates a NOS and mTOR/protein synthesis-dependent pathway while higher Sema3a concentration induces a GSK-3β-dependent/protein synthesis-independent pathway.

Overall these results suggest that activation of discrete pathways by low and high concentrations of guidance cues might increase the diversity of possible responses of axons to the arguably limited number of guidance cues involved in the wiring of the nervous system (Kolodkin and Tessier-Lavigne, 2011). Finally, repulsive or inhibitory signals contribute to the limited regenerative capacity of the adult nervous system (Giger et al., 2010). If similar bimodal response system is active in injured axons, it might be necessary to develop combinatorial strategies to overcome the repulsive environment of the adult nervous system and to promote more effective regeneration and recovery.

Figure 7. Subtype dependent bimodal response to semaphorins is distinguished by protein synthesis requirement.

Figure 7

Protein synthesis dependent and independent pathways are activated by different concentration of Sema3f in both cervical and brachio-thoracic motor neurons. In contrast the “low” protein synthesis dependent Sema3a pathway is observed only in brachio-thoracic motor neurons while both populations of neurons are responsive to high Sema3a (in a protein synthesis independent manner). The cervical motor neurons appear to lack the receptors or the components of the transduction cascade linking low concentration of Sema3a to the protein translation machinery. Collapse induced by Ephrin-As at all tested concentrations is independent of the protein synthesis pathway.

Acknowledgements

This project was supported by grants from the Research Initiatives in Science and Engineering (RISE), the Gatsby foundation and Center for Motor Neuron Biology and Disease, and NIH grants (NS058502, NS055923). S.N. was in part supported by a fellowship form the Families of SMA foundation. M.P. was supported by a DoD grant (522050) and NIH training grant (HD055165). M.W.A. was supported by the Project A.L.S. foundation. We thank Artur Kania, Esteban Mazzoni and members of the Wichterle lab for helpful discussion and critical review of the manuscript, Susan Brenner-Morton and Thomas Jessell for the RALDH2 antibody and Morris Reichlin for the anti-P protein serum.

Footnotes

Conflict of interest: The authors declare no conflicts of interest

References

  1. Andreassi C, Zimmermann C, Mitter R, Fusco S, Devita S, Saiardi A, Riccio A. An NGF-responsive element targets myo-inositol monophosphatase-1 mRNA to sympathetic neuron axons. Nat Neurosci. 13:291–301. doi: 10.1038/nn.2486. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bassell GJ, Zhang H, Byrd AL, Femino AM, Singer RH, Taneja KL, Lifshitz LM, Herman IM, Kosik KS. Sorting of beta-actin mRNA and protein to neurites and growth cones in culture. J Neurosci. 1998;18:251–265. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-01-00251.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Batish M, Raj A, Tyagi S. Single molecule imaging of RNA in situ. Methods Mol Biol. 2011;714:3–13. doi: 10.1007/978-1-61779-005-8_1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bonanomi D, Pfaff SL. Motor axon pathfinding. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2010;2:a001735. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a001735. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Boulting GL, Kiskinis E, Croft GF, Amoroso MW, Oakley DH, Wainger BJ, Williams DJ, Kahler DJ, Yamaki M, Davidow L, Rodolfa CT, Dimos JT, Mikkilineni S, MacDermott AB, Woolf CJ, Henderson CE, Wichterle H, Eggan K. A functionally characterized test set of human induced pluripotent stem cells. Nat Biotechnol. 2011;29:279–286. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1783. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Brown JA, Wysolmerski RB, Bridgman PC. Dorsal root ganglion neurons react to semaphorin 3A application through a biphasic response that requires multiple myosin II isoforms. Mol Biol Cell. 2009;20:1167–1179. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E08-01-0065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Brunet I, Weinl C, Piper M, Trembleau A, Volovitch M, Harris W, Prochiantz A, Holt C. The transcription factor Engrailed-2 guides retinal axons. Nature. 2005;438:94–98. doi: 10.1038/nature04110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Campbell DS, Holt CE. Chemotropic responses of retinal growth cones mediated by rapid local protein synthesis and degradation. Neuron. 2001;32:1013–1026. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(01)00551-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cohen S, Funkelstein L, Livet J, Rougon G, Henderson CE, Castellani V, Mann F. A semaphorin code defines subpopulations of spinal motor neurons during mouse development. Eur J Neurosci. 2005;21:1767–1776. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2005.04021.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cox LJ, Hengst U, Gurskaya NG, Lukyanov KA, Jaffrey SR. Intra-axonal translation and retrograde trafficking of CREB promotes neuronal survival. Nat Cell Biol. 2008;10:149–159. doi: 10.1038/ncb1677. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Dasen JS, Jessell TM. Hox networks and the origins of motor neuron diversity. Curr Top Dev Biol. 2009;88:169–200. doi: 10.1016/S0070-2153(09)88006-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Dimos JT, Rodolfa KT, Niakan KK, Weisenthal LM, Mitsumoto H, Chung W, Croft GF, Saphier G, Leibel R, Goland R, Wichterle H, Henderson CE, Eggan K. Induced pluripotent stem cells generated from patients with ALS can be differentiated into motor neurons. Science. 2008;321:1218–1221. doi: 10.1126/science.1158799. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Eberhart J, Swartz M, Koblar SA, Pasquale EB, Tanaka H, Krull CE. Expression of EphA4, ephrin-A2 and ephrin-A5 during axon outgrowth to the hindlimb indicates potential roles in pathfinding. Dev Neurosci. 2000;22:237–250. doi: 10.1159/000017446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Gallarda BW, Bonanomi D, Muller D, Brown A, Alaynick WA, Andrews SE, Lemke G, Pfaff SL, Marquardt T. Segregation of axial motor and sensory pathways via heterotypic trans-axonal signaling. Science. 2008;320:233–236. doi: 10.1126/science.1153758. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Giger RJ, Hollis ER, 2nd, Tuszynski MH. Guidance molecules in axon regeneration. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2010;2:a001867. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a001867. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Guirland C, Buck KB, Gibney JA, DiCicco-Bloom E, Zheng JQ. Direct cAMP signaling through G-protein-coupled receptors mediates growth cone attraction induced by pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide. J Neurosci. 2003;23:2274–2283. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-06-02274.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Gumy LF, Tan CL, Fawcett JW. The role of local protein synthesis and degradation in axon regeneration. Exp Neurol. 2010;223:28–37. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2009.06.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Haupt C, Huber AB. How axons see their way--axonal guidance in the visual system. Front Biosci. 2008;13:3136–3149. doi: 10.2741/2915. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Haupt C, Kloos K, Faus-Kessler T, Huber AB. Semaphorin 3A-Neuropilin-1 signaling regulates peripheral axon fasciculation and pathfinding but not developmental cell death patterns. Eur J Neurosci. 2010;31:1164–1172. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2010.07154.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Helmbacher F, Schneider-Maunoury S, Topilko P, Tiret L, Charnay P. Targeting of the EphA4 tyrosine kinase receptor affects dorsal/ventral pathfinding of limb motor axons. Development. 2000;127:3313–3324. doi: 10.1242/dev.127.15.3313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Hengst U, Deglincerti A, Kim HJ, Jeon NL, Jaffrey SR. Axonal elongation triggered by stimulus-induced local translation of a polarity complex protein. Nat Cell Biol. 2009;11:1024–1030. doi: 10.1038/ncb1916. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Huber AB, Kania A, Tran TS, Gu C, De Marco Garcia N, Lieberam I, Johnson D, Jessell TM, Ginty DD, Kolodkin AL. Distinct roles for secreted semaphorin signaling in spinal motor axon guidance. Neuron. 2005;48:949–964. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.12.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Huettl RE, Soellner H, Bianchi E, Novitch BG, Huber AB. Npn-1 contributes to axon-axon interactions that differentially control sensory and motor innervation of the limb. PLoS Biol. 2011;9:e1001020. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Jaffrey SR. Response to “Protein synthesis in distal axons is not required for growth cone responses to guidance cues”. JNeurosi. 2009;29:638–652. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3845-08.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Jung H, Holt CE. Local translation of mRNAs in neural development. Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA. 2011;2:153–165. doi: 10.1002/wrna.53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Kania A, Jessell TM. Topographic motor projections in the limb imposed by LIM homeodomain protein regulation of ephrin-A:EphA interactions. Neuron. 2003;38:581–596. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(03)00292-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Kania A, Johnson RL, Jessell TM. Coordinate roles for LIM homeobox genes in directing the dorsoventral trajectory of motor axons in the vertebrate limb. Cell. 2000;102:161–173. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)00022-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Kao TJ, Kania A. Ephrin-Mediated cis-Attenuation of Eph Receptor Signaling Is Essential for Spinal Motor Axon Guidance. Neuron. 2011;71:76–91. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.05.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Kolodkin AL, Tessier-Lavigne M. Mechanisms and molecules of neuronal wiring: a primer. Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology. 2011;3 doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a001727. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Krall JA, Beyer EM, MacBeath G. High- and low-affinity epidermal growth factor receptor-ligand interactions activate distinct signaling pathways. PLoS One. 2011;6:e15945. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0015945. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Li C, Bassell GJ, Sasaki Y. Fragile X Mental Retardation Protein is Involved in Protein Synthesis-Dependent Collapse of Growth Cones Induced by Semaphorin-3A. Front Neural Circuits. 2009;3:11. doi: 10.3389/neuro.04.011.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Li C, Sasaki Y, Takei K, Yamamoto H, Shouji M, Sugiyama Y, Kawakami T, Nakamura F, Yagi T, Ohshima T, Goshima Y. Correlation between semaphorin3A-induced facilitation of axonal transport and local activation of a translation initiation factor eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E. J Neurosci. 2004;24:6161–6170. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1476-04.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Li XJ, Du ZW, Zarnowska ED, Pankratz M, Hansen LO, Pearce RA, Zhang SC. Specification of motoneurons from human embryonic stem cells. Nat Biotechnol. 2005;23:215–221. doi: 10.1038/nbt1063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Luria V, Krawchuk D, Jessell TM, Laufer E, Kania A. Specification of motor axon trajectory by ephrin-B:EphB signaling: symmetrical control of axonal patterning in the developing limb. Neuron. 2008;60:1039–1053. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.11.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Mann F, Miranda E, Weinl C, Harmer E, Holt CE. B-type Eph receptors and ephrins induce growth cone collapse through distinct intracellular pathways. J Neurobiol. 2003;57:323–336. doi: 10.1002/neu.10303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Marquardt T, Shirasaki R, Ghosh S, Andrews SE, Carter N, Hunter T, Pfaff SL. Coexpressed EphA receptors and ephrin-A ligands mediate opposing actions on growth cone navigation from distinct membrane domains. Cell. 2005;121:127–139. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.01.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Ming GL, Wong ST, Henley J, Yuan XB, Song HJ, Spitzer NC, Poo MM. Adaptation in the chemotactic guidance of nerve growth cones. Nature. 2002;417:411–418. doi: 10.1038/nature745. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Moret F, Renaudot C, Bozon M, Castellani V. Semaphorin and neuropilin co-expression in motoneurons sets axon sensitivity to environmental semaphorin sources during motor axon pathfinding. Development. 2007;134:4491–4501. doi: 10.1242/dev.011452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Nalesso G, Sherwood J, Bertrand J, Pap T, Ramachandran M, De Bari C, Pitzalis C, Dell’accio F. WNT-3A modulates articular chondrocyte phenotype by activating both canonical and noncanonical pathways. J Cell Biol. 2011;193:551–564. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201011051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Nie D, Di Nardo A, Han JM, Baharanyi H, Kramvis I, Huynh T, Dabora S, Codeluppi S, Pandolfi PP, Pasquale EB, Sahin M. Tsc2-Rheb signaling regulates EphA-mediated axon guidance. Nat Neurosci. 2010;13:163–172. doi: 10.1038/nn.2477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Ohta K, Iwamasa H, Drescher U, Terasaki H, Tanaka H. The inhibitory effect on neurite outgrowth of motoneurons exerted by the ligands ELF-1 and RAGS. Mech Dev. 1997;64:127–135. doi: 10.1016/s0925-4773(97)00056-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Patani R, Hollins AJ, Wishart TM, Puddifoot CA, Alvarez S, de Lera AR, Wyllie DJ, Compston DA, Pedersen RA, Gillingwater TH, Hardingham GE, Allen ND, Chandran S. Retinoid-independent motor neurogenesis from human embryonic stem cells reveals a medial columnar ground state. Nat Commun. 2011;2:214. doi: 10.1038/ncomms1216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Peljto M, Dasen JS, Mazzoni EO, Jessell TM, Wichterle H. Functional diversity of ESC-derived motor neuron subtypes revealed through intraspinal transplantation. Cell Stem Cell. 2010;7:355–366. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2010.07.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Petros TJ, Bryson JB, Mason C. Ephrin-B2 elicits differential growth cone collapse and axon retraction in retinal ganglion cells from distinct retinal regions. Dev Neurobiol. 2010;70:781–794. doi: 10.1002/dneu.20821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Piper M, Salih S, Weinl C, Holt CE, Harris WA. Endocytosis-dependent desensitization and protein synthesis-dependent resensitization in retinal growth cone adaptation. Nat Neurosci. 2005;8:179–186. doi: 10.1038/nn1380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Piper M, Anderson R, Dwivedy A, Weinl C, van Horck F, Leung KM, Cogill E, Holt C. Signaling mechanisms underlying Slit2-induced collapse of Xenopus retinal growth cones. Neuron. 2006;49:215–228. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.12.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Raj A, van den Bogaard P, Rifkin SA, van Oudenaarden A, Tyagi S. Imaging individual mRNA molecules using multiple singly labeled probes. Nat Methods. 2008;5:877–879. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Roche FK, Marsick BM, Letourneau PC. Protein synthesis in distal axons is not required for growth cone responses to guidance cues. J Neurosci. 2009;29:638–652. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3845-08.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Rossoll W, Jablonka S, Andreassi C, Kroning AK, Karle K, Monani UR, Sendtner M. Smn, the spinal muscular atrophy-determining gene product, modulates axon growth and localization of beta-actin mRNA in growth cones of motoneurons. J Cell Biol. 2003;163:801–812. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200304128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Shi P, Nedelec S, Wichterle H, Kam LC. Combined microfluidics/protein patterning platform for pharmacological interrogation of axon pathfinding. Lab Chip. 2010;10:1005–1010. doi: 10.1039/b922143c. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Sigismund S, Argenzio E, Tosoni D, Cavallaro E, Polo S, Di Fiore PP. Clathrin-mediated internalization is essential for sustained EGFR signaling but dispensable for degradation. Dev Cell. 2008;15:209–219. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2008.06.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Sockanathan S, Jessell TM. Motor neuron-derived retinoid signaling specifies the subtype identity of spinal motor neurons. Cell. 1998;94:503–514. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81591-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Soundararajan P, Fawcett JP, Rafuse VF. Guidance of postural motoneurons requires MAPK/ERK signaling downstream of fibroblast growth factor receptor 1. J Neurosci. 2010;30:6595–6606. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4932-09.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Wang L, Klein R, Zheng B, Marquardt T. Anatomical Coupling of Sensory and Motor Nerve Trajectory via Axon Tracking. Neuron. 2011;71:263–277. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.06.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Wichterle H, Lieberam I, Porter JA, Jessell TM. Directed differentiation of embryonic stem cells into motor neurons. Cell. 2002;110:385–397. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(02)00835-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Willis DE, van Niekerk EA, Sasaki Y, Mesngon M, Merianda TT, Williams GG, Kendall M, Smith DS, Bassell GJ, Twiss JL. Extracellular stimuli specifically regulate localized levels of individual neuronal mRNAs. J Cell Biol. 2007;178:965–980. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200703209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Wizenmann A, Brunet I, Lam JS, Sonnier L, Beurdeley M, Zarbalis K, Weisenhorn-Vogt D, Weinl C, Dwivedy A, Joliot A, Wurst W, Holt C, Prochiantz A. Extracellular Engrailed participates in the topographic guidance of retinal axons in vivo. Neuron. 2009;64:355–366. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2009.09.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Wu KY, Hengst U, Cox LJ, Macosko EZ, Jeromin A, Urquhart ER, Jaffrey SR. Local translation of RhoA regulates growth cone collapse. Nature. 2005;436:1020–1024. doi: 10.1038/nature03885. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Yohn DC, Miles GB, Rafuse VF, Brownstone RM. Transplanted mouse embryonic stem-cell-derived motoneurons form functional motor units and reduce muscle atrophy. J Neurosci. 2008;28:12409–12418. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1761-08.2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES