Abstract
Reminiscent of bacterial quorum sensing, mammalian mitochondria participate in inter-organelle communication. However, physical structures that enhance or enable interactions between mitochondria have not been defined. Here we report that adjacent mitochondria exhibit coordination of inner mitochondrial membrane cristae at inter-mitochondrial junctions (IMJs). These electron-dense structures are conserved across species, resistant to genetic disruption of cristae organization, dynamically modulated by mitochondrial bioenergetics, independent of known inter-mitochondrial tethering proteins mitofusins, and rapidly induced by the stable rapprochement of organelles via inducible synthetic linker technology. At the associated junctions, the cristae of adjacent mitochondria form parallel arrays perpendicular to the IMJ, consistent with a role in electrochemical coupling. These IMJs and associated cristae arrays may provide the structural basis to enhance the propagation of intracellular bioenergetic and apoptotic waves through mitochondrial networks within cells.
Keywords: mitochondria, intermitochondrial communication, ultrastructure, electron tomography, cristae organization
In recent decades, the concept of static, oblong-shaped mitochondria has evolved to a dynamic model where mitochondria behave within mammalian cells as a physically and functionally interconnected network of organelles. Mitochondrial networking, with other organelles1 and with each other, occurs in part via dynamic fusion and fission processes, disorders of which are recognized causes of human disease2. Thus, connectivity and communication of mitochondria within the cytoplasm appear crucial to cellular homeostasis3, 4. Such networking is reminiscent of the behavior of mitochondria’s ancestor, the bacteria5, which exchange signals enabling quorum-sensing, leading to synchronization of gene expression and unified community action6. However, structural elements that could enable or facilitate similar interactions among mitochondria within eukaryotic cells have not been defined.
In particular, mitochondrial communication involves inter-mitochondrial transmission of the electrochemical gradient, or electrochemical coupling7, 8, 9. Apoptotic signaling involving mitochondrial depolarization also proceeds in waves across the mitochondrial network10, 11. Importantly, such rapid events of inter-mitochondrial transmission travel further than do intra-mitochondrial matrix components, distinguishing them from events of complete mitochondrial fusion7. Nevertheless, rapid inter-mitochondrial communication involves physical proximity and contact between mitochondria7, 12. This could serve the purpose of equilibrating the energetic state across adjacent mitochondria. Earlier work suggested the presence of inter-mitochondrial junctions (IMJs), which correlated with electrical coupling between adjacent mitochondria13.
With this model in mind, we used transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and tomographic reconstructions to investigate sites of physical interaction between mitochondria in various tissues and animal species. This revealed specialized electron-dense IMJ structures associated with increased cristae junctions numbers, and coordination of cristae orientation between mitochondria. Linking mitochondria to one another with an inducible synthetic linker system in living cells rapidly induced IMJs and associated cristae. These results reveal previously unrecognized coordination of mitochondrial ultractructure at sites of physical interactions, with implications for the transfer of information between organelles.
Results
Mitochondrial contacts at inter-mitochondrial junctions (IMJs)
We began our investigation in the mouse heart, the tissue of highest mitochondrial volume density in mammals. At relatively high magnification, the majority of adjacent mitochondria exhibit sites of membrane contact with enhanced electron-density, defined as IMJs (Figure 1A, red arrows). This is consistent with the notion of a mitochondrial syncytium13, 14. However, the simple juxtaposition of organelles does not necessarily produce an IMJ (Figure 1A, yellow arrowheads), indicating a certain degree of biological regulation, rather than a ubiquitous, obligatory feature of mitochondrial proximity. Higher magnification TEM at individual membrane resolution reveals that the outer (OMM) and inner (IMM) mitochondrial membranes of adjacent mitochondria at IMJs remain distinct (Figure 1B). Adjacent OMMs were separated by ~7.8 ± 3.7 nm (M ± S.D.) (Figure 1B).
At high magnification, apposed IMJ OMMs exhibit enhanced electron density throughout their length (Figure 1C, D). At the present time, the nature of this enhanced electron density is unknown, but it is likely a result of increased protein and cofactor density. Notably, existing sites of tethering and interaction between mitochondria and the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), plasma membrane and other organelles1, 15 does not show comparable membrane electron density (Figure 1E). Thus, electron-dense IMJs constitute a phenomenon specific to mitochondria-mitochondria interactions.
A survey of published images from the literature indicates that IMJs exist across a variety of mammalian species including rodents and human, amphibians; and across tissues including heart, skeletal muscle, brain, brown fat, retina and glioma (Supplementary Table 1). To determine if these structures are conserved in other animal species, we examined electron micrographs of striated muscle from lower organisms including arthropods (flies) and mollusk (scallop) (Supplementary Figure 1). All contain IMJs. The presence of IMJs and associated specific cristae distribution is thus phylogenetically and evolutionary conserved.
Mitochondrial cristae number is increased at IMJs
The mitochondrial electron transport chain is located within mitochondrial cristae where it generates the electrochemical potential across the invaginated IMM, which is used for ATP synthesis. Cristae membranes form tubular openings as they join with the inner boundary membrane, termed cristae junctions, which are regulated by the ‘cristae organizing system’16. At cristae junctions, molecules and ions are exchanged between the cristae invaginations and inter-membrane space17, 18, 19. In mouse heart and skeletal muscle mitochondria, ultrathin section TEM imaging consistently suggested that cristae junctions were more abundant at IMJs (see Figure 1E, dotted lines). To examine this, we produced tomograms to quantify cristae junction density per surface area of mitochondrial OMM (Figure S2).
Cristae form junctions more frequently at IMJs (+69.7 ± 20.6 %, M ± S.E.M.) compared to areas of mitochondria facing non-mitochondrial components such as myofibrils (Figure 2A, B). Cristae arising from junctions at IMJs also tend to have fewer fenestrations (i.e., openings in the cristae membrane plane), yielding longer profiles when sectioned longitudinally (Figure 2A). Among potential mechanisms to explain this finding, it is notable that protons produce deep cristae-like invaginations within IMM-like cardiolopin-containing membranes20. Thus, if protons accumulated preferentially at IMJs, this could account for the predominance of continuous cristae radiating perpendicularly (see below) from the contact sites.
Cristae of adjacent mitochondria are coordinated at IMJs
That IMJs are involved in mitochondrion-mitochondrion (mito-mito) interactions is further indicated by the observation that cristae membranes exhibit a high degree of alignment between adjacent organelles (see examples in Supplementary Figure 3). Trans-mitochondrial cristae alignment is most clearly visualized through a series of consecutive frames spanning the thickness of a tomogram (~200 nm) where several mitochondria form IMJs in mouse heart (Supplementary Video 1).
This inter-mitochondrial coordination of cristae in cardiomyocytes often involves multiple organelles organized in clusters (Figure 2C, C′). When comparing pairs of neighboring mitochondria at IMJs, 58.3% of pairs have aligned cristae (<30° incident angle) compared to 13.2% non-aligned (60–90°) (Chi-square P < 0.0001, Figure 2D). In contrast, cristae at non-IMJ contacts, where electron density is unchanged, are randomly oriented with no evidence of alignment between adjacent mitochondria (Figure 2D, E). As a result, the median incident angle between mitochondria linked by an IMJ is 20.5 ± 23.9°, compared to 51.8 ± 27.1° for non-IMJ contacts (Chi square P < 0.01, Figure 2F). Thus, cristae orientation, curvature and density per surface area are nonrandom, exhibiting directionality and orientation that may enable cristae membranes of adjacent mitochondria to become physically and energetically coordinated. Such trans-mitochondrial coordination of cristae at IMJs would account for the collateral accumulation of membrane potential-sensitive dyes in adjacent mitochondria observed in cultured human cells21.
To determine if cristae energetics and organization are obligatory for IMJ formation, we experimentally disrupted these properties by genetically ablating the adenine nucleotide translocase 1 (Ant1−/−)22 and introducing a pathogenic mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) mutation in the ND623, which codes for a subunit of the electron transport chain. This deleterious genetic combination render cristae highly disorganized. Yet in this context, trans-mitochondrial cristae alignment still occurs, and mitochondrial IMJs still form (Figure 3A). Thus, even when mitochondrial cristae are naturally dysmorphic, the physical juxtaposition associated with IMJ leads to cristae alignment across neighboring mitochondria.
Within normal heart mitochondria, cristae membranes occasionally exhibit a high degree of membrane curvature (see Figure 3B and Supplementary Figure 3). This occurs when the cristae within single a mitochondrion extends between two IMJs formed with different mitochondria. Measuring the incident angle of cristae membranes relative to the tangent of IMJs and non-IMJ contacts (Figure 3C) reveals that the presence or absence of IMJs influence cristae orientation. Whereas cristae emerging from non-electron dense contacts have no preferred incident angle, cristae at IMJs are preferentially arrayed at right-angles from the contact site (Figure 3D). The distribution of cristae angles at non-IMJ is near random (skewness = 0.02), but the distribution at IMJs is negatively skewed (skewness = −0.61) with significantly fewer low angles at IMJs than expected by chance (Figure 3D). In order to maintain cristae continuity in this manner, being constrained at the two ends at IMJs, the cristae membranes must occasionally bend. This lipid bilayer conformation being energetically unfavorable, this implies some degree of regulation and functional relevance24.
IMJs are physiologically regulated
Consistent with a physiological role of these interactions, the proportion of mitochondrial contacts harboring enhanced electron density correlates with the cell’s reliance on OXPHOS for energy production. IMJ abundance progresses from non-existent in cultured 143B osteosarcoma cell lines, to <1% in induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC) differentiated to the cardiomyocyte lineage in vitro, 8.4% in mouse skeletal muscle (soleus), 24.6% in diaphragm (more oxidative than soleus), and 53.7% in the cardiac left ventricle (most oxidative) (Figure 4A).
Interestingly, mitochondrial IMJs are dynamically modulated in the absence of changes in mitochondrial content. We previously found that enhancing cellular energy demand in mouse skeletal muscle by a single bout of voluntary exercise increases mitochondrial IMJs by 1–2 fold, although the significance of this observation was not fully appreciated25. In contrast, reducing cellular energy demand in the diaphragm by suppressing contractile activity during mechanical ventilation tends to decrease IMJ abundance. In the heart, IMJs increase in proportion with pressure overload, and vanish after prolonged cardiac arrest where mitochondria become depolarized26. IMJs also appear dynamically regulated in mitochondria isolated from their cellular context, upon addition of electron donors to generate membrane potential27. Thus, IMJs are dynamic structures whose abundance and function are an intrinsic property of mitochondria physiologically regulated by their bioenergetic state.
IMJs could represent pre-fusion events halted by cytoplasmic factors in the state of inter-organelle tethering28. To determine if this was the case, we tested whether IMJs and cristae alignment depend upon mitofusins 1 and 2 (Mfn1, Mfn2), the only two proteins currently known to mediate inter-mitochondrial tethering. In mice with heart-specific germline deletion of either protein (Mfn1KO, Mfn2 KO), IMJs and cristae alignment still occurs (Figure 4B–D). In the cardiac inducible Mfn1/Mfn2DKO mice, which have almost complete loss of Mfn1 and Mfn2 after 3w weeks of induction29, trans-mitochondrial cristae alignment appears unaffected (Figure 4E). Therefore, we conclude from this that mitofusins are not essential for the formation of the IMJ and trans-mitochondrial coordination of cristae.
IMJs and cristae are induced by stably linking mitochondria
To determine if the formation of IMJs and cristae alignment could be induced by the stable juxtaposition of mitochondrial OMMs, we used a novel drug-inducible system that physically links adjacent mitochondria together. RBL-2H3 cells were transiently transfected with two constructs, each encoding a component of the FKBP-FRB heterodimerization system linked to OMM-targeting domains. FKBP and FRB proteins project out of the OMM and include a rapamycin binding site at their end. The addition of rapamycin binds the apposing OMM projections, physically tethering two mitochondria together. Confocal imaging of cells induced by rapamycin indicated stable docking of mitochondria within 30 minutes (Figures 5A, A′ and B, B′).
Compared to non-induced cells, where physical contact between mitochondria is nonexistent (Figure 5C), induced tethering leads to increased OMM electron density along the length of inter-mitochondrial contacts, recapitulating IMJ structures (Figure 5D, E). In addition, as in cardiomyocyte mitochondria, electron-dense sites of mitochondrial tethers contain significantly more cristae per membrane area than sites of mitochondria in contact with non-mitochondrial structures (Figure 5F, G). These results further indicate the dynamic nature of these structures. Moreover, this demonstrates that both IMJs and cristae formation can be induced by stable juxtaposition of mitochondria, suggesting that physical contact of energized mitochondria can stimulate membrane interactions and cristae coordination (Figure 5H).
Discussion
Communication among biological organisms is a ubiquitous feature that pervades across levels of organization – from cells to whole organisms. Recent studies suggest that subcellular information can be transferred between neighboring mitochondria7, 8, 9, 10, 11. Our results now establish the existence of trans-mitochondrial cristae coordination at specialized IMJs. These features are conserved in various cell types across tissues and animal species, are resistant to genetic disruption of cristae morphology from altered oxidative phosphorylation, independent of mitofusins yet inducible by physically and stably linking together adjacent mitochondria. In addition, IMJ numbers exist in proportion with cellular mitochondrial content and are dynamically regulated with energetic demand, being practically inexistent in cultured cells and most abundant in cardiomyocytes. Collectively, this data suggests that such specialized mitochondrial membrane structures exist to promote information transfer inside the cytoplasm of eukaryotic cells30.
Mammalian mitochondria evolved, in an endosymbiotic relationship with the eukaryotic cell, from their aerobic bacterial ancestors. The behavior of bacteria is characterized by an extensive set of inter-cellular signaling mechanisms, such as the release of soluble molecules and physical membrane interactions (e.g., for DNA transfer of antibiotic resistance genes). Collectively, organized processes of information transfer between bacteria enable ‘quorum sensing’ – which trigger the coordination of gene expression patterns and synchronous behavior among members of the bacterial colony6. A hallmark of bacterial quorum sensing is that bacteria-bacteria communication is preferentially induced at high population density31. Therefore, should inter-mitochondrial communication share an evolutionary-conserved functional role with bacterial processes, this fact would be compatible with the increased rate of IMJs in parallel with tissue mitochondrial density.
While the exact function of IMJs remains to be determined, one possibility is that the IMJs are ion channels allowing the electrochemical gradients of adjacent mitochondria to be coupled7, 10, 32, thereby enhancing the bioenergetic efficiency across functional clusters of mitochondria within the mitochondrial reticulum13, 33, 34. In this regard, the physical alignment of cristae across mitochondria would be relevant since unlike other ions and molecules, the electrochemical potential generated within the cristae invaginations is distributed uniformly along their full length35. If the apposition of cristae junctions between two mitochondria at an IMJ resulted in a continuous inter-membrane space, then membrane potential could thus be transferred between organelles7. It may be that such putative channels are dynamically regulated, being only seldom captured in an open confirmation.
The extensive bending of cristae linked to IMJs implies regulation and functional significance. Natural and thermodynamically stable conformations of lipid bilayers are flat sheets. Relatively high degrees of membrane curvature can be caused and maintained by the presence of proteins within the membrane, such as the dimerized ATP synthase36. But in this case, incorporation of ATP synthase dimers in the IMM causes a circumferential curving of cristae that facilitates tubule formation (rather than sheets). This conformation is different than the longitudinal bending tubules or flat lipid sheets along the length of cristae, as it happens between two IMJs. The bending of cristae from one end to the other, a thermodynamically unfavorable conformation, must therefore involve the input of energy, implying regulation of cristae biogenesis, organization, or both at IMJs24. This postulate is further supported by the increased number of cristae junctions at IMJs, both in the natural setting of muscle cells, and in vitro by the induced tethering of mitochondria. Furthermore, the functional association of IMJs and cristae is supported by the propensity of cristae to form right angles exclusively at IMJs, where cristae are rarely (less than 4% of all surveyed cases) oriented parallel to IMJs (see Figure 3D).
Cristae architecture also directly influences respiratory properties and susceptibility to mitochondrial permeability transition leading to apoptotic signaling37. As a result, modulation of cristae organization by any factor, including mitochondrial interactions and trans-mitochondrial cristae coordination, could influence mitochondrial functions. In addition to potential enhancement of intrinsic mitochondrial functions, network connectivity provides physiological robustness ensuring energy supply in a coordinated fashion with cellular energy demand38. However, the possibility of a single fused mitochondrial reticulum would not be bioenergetically advantageous, and could favor the spread of molecular mtDNA defects39. In reality, the physiological coupling of distinct mitochondria by regulated membrane junctions may afford the advantage of maintaining separate organelles with relatively heterogeneous composition, while also benefiting from the synchronization of mitochondria’s energetic states within cells.
A few reasons may explain why trans-mitochondrial cristae coordination was not previously observed. First, only recently was the rapid exchange of electrochemical information between mitochondria unequivocally demonstrated7, 9. This provided the necessary impetus for shifting high-resolution EM investigation of mitochondrial ultrastructure – from single-mitochondrion to mitochondrial dyads, with an emphasis on spatial correlations between organelles. Second, the alignment of cristae between mitochondria could appear as spurious events on single ultrathin sections of tissue. We found that electron tomography – the three-dimensional high-resolution imaging of thick tissue samples – was critical to provide compelling evidence for the coordination of multiple cristae through the thickness of multiple mitochondria (e.g., Supplementary Video 1). The use of tomography is also primordial to quantify the number of cristae junctions at IMJs and non-IMJ contacts. Finally, cristae coordination at IMJs, or the lack thereof, was made particularly obvious upon examination of animal models with naturally disorganized and dismorphic cristae (see Figure 3A). Thus, the combination of these approaches, along with quantitative assessment of cristae angles and inter-organelle coordination were critical to document these structures.
In summary, our morphological analysis of mitochondrial interactions reveals that adjacent mitochondria can interact through specialized, regulated inter-mitochondrial junction sites, where cristae membranes become organized into coordinated pairs across organelles. These conserved features reveal an unsuspected level of interaction between mitochondria, and may provide a structural basis for observed rapid events of electrochemical inter-mitochondrial communication. At present, incompatible methodology between that required to resolve these ultrastructural features and the experimental conditions necessary for effective immunolabeling preclude clarification of potential IMJ constituents. Future studies will be required to uncover the full physiological significance of these structures, as well as their molecular composition and the mechanisms that orchestrate their regulation.
Methods
Animals and tissue collection
All protocols were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees from the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Thomas Jefferson University, or the University of Washington at St-Louis. For analyses of mouse tissues, 8–12 month old C57BL/6EiJ mice were used. Animals were euthanized by cervical dislocation, the left myocardium immediately dissected into <0.5mm thick slices and fixed as described below. For skeletal muscle, the soleus was cut longitudinally along the midline and fixed under identical conditions.
Transgenic mitochondrial mutant mice with dysmorphic cristae were created by combining specific pathogenic alterations in both the mtDNA and nDNA. Briefly, female mice homoplasmic for a mtDNA point mutation at nucleotide G13997A in the NADH dehydrogenase subunit 6 (ND6) gene causing the amino acid substitution P25L23, were crossed onto a nDNA background (Figure 2E, F) lacking the adenine nucleotide translocase isoform 1 (Ant1−/−)22. The resulting double mutant mice presented with severely disrupted cristae, consistent with a role of ATP synthase and ETC function as determinant of cristae shape36.
Mice lacking Mfn1 and Mfn2 were generated using a full-length MYH6 driven Cre recombinase to obtain postnatal Mfn2 cardiac-specific deficiency40 (Figure 3B). To circumvent the embryonic lethality caused by ablation of both mitofusins, cardiac-specific Mfn1/Mfn2DKO mice were generated using a tamoxifen-inducible modified estrogen receptor (MER) cardiac-specific MYH6-Cre system, resulting in 80–85% loss of Mfn1 and Mfn2 after 3w weeks29.
Preparation of samples for transmission EM
Samples were immediately fixed by immersion in a 2% glutaraldehyde solution in 0.1M cacodylate, buffer (pH 7.4)41. After subsequent buffer washes, samples were post-fixed in 2.0% osmium tetroxide for 1 hour at room temperature, and rinsed in distilled H2O prior to in-bloc staining with 2% uranyl acetate. After dehydration through a graded ethanol series, each sample was infiltrated and embedded in EMbed-812 (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Fort Washington, PA). To verify orientation and section quality, 1 μm-thick sections were cut and stained with 1% toluidine blue. Thin sections (90 μm) were mounted on filmed copper grids and stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate, and examined on a JEOL 1010 electron microscope fitted with a Hamamatsu digital camera and AMT Advantage image capture software.
We found that glutaraldehyde-only fixation is primordial for preservation of electron density in IMJs, whereas paraformaldehyde is not optimal. Post-staining of ultrathin sections (with uranyl acetate and lead citrate) was not necessary to visualize electron-dense IMJs, which were visible from en-block-only osmium-tetroxide stained specimens. In addition to published images from laboratories worldwide where IMJs and cristae features can be observed (see Table S1 and associated images), our observations of IMJs in mouse heart and skeletal muscle were reproducible in samples collected in seven different laboratories across eight strains of mice, with tissues processed and imaged in five different imaging facilities/laboratories.
For tomography, approximately 150–300 um-thick sections were imaged by dual axis image tilt series from −60° to +60° in 1.5 degree increments on a FEI Tecnai 12 microscope equipped with a Gatan US-1000 camera at 6,500–12,000x magnification using SerialEM42. Tomographic volumes were reconsructured within the etomo software package43. Analysis and video synthesis were performed using 3Dmod (IMOD 4.7, Boulder Laboratory for 3-D Electron Microscopy of Cells) and Image J (NIH, version 1.47v).
Membrane electron density
Electron micrographs from heart at approximately 30,000–100,000x indirect magnification (pixel length: 1.31–2.20 nm, respectively) were analyzed using Image J. Mitochondrial membranes on calibrated 8-bit images, with each pixel representing ~1.8 nm, were manually traced. Area was converted to line, a pixel intensity plot generated, and data exported to Microsoft Excel. For each mitochondrion analyzed (n = 20), intensity was measured for the surrounding cytoplasm, matrix space, OMM and IMM (without contact), cristae, and OMM at IMJs. Values were normalized to cytoplasm intensity to standardize overall image brightness. Final membrane intensity values (Figures 1C and D) were obtained by taking the inverse of averaged intensity values minus background. Whereas most IMJs could be resolved at single-membrane level, at some IMJ OMM membranes cannot be distinguished when lipid bilayer leaflets were not precisely perpendicular to the sectioning/imaging plane.
Cristae density and alignment
To quantify the surface density of cristae (number of cristae per membrane surface area) at IMJs and non-IMJ contacts, 3D tomograms were manually analyzed. Junctions between cristae and the IMM outer boundary membrane (cristae junctions) could thus be accurately determined. In total, 510 cristae junctions were analyzed, derived from four complete tomographic reconstructions containing 14 interacting mitochondria. On average, tomograms were 221 nm thick. In each reconstruction plane, cristae junctions were individually numbered and traced until a fenestration was encountered, thus revealing discontinuity (Figure 2A, Supplementary Figure 2). For each mitochondrion (using paired analysis) cristae density normalized to μm2 of outer boundary membrane was compared between areas of the mitochondrion forming IMJs with other mitochondria, and areas of the same mitochondrion in contact with non-mitochondrial structures (i.e., myofilaments) (Figure 2B).
To evaluate if cristae between adjacent mitochondria were physically coordinated, cristae angle within the picture frame were measured in Image J on images at 12,000x indirect magnification (pixel length: 11.02nm). In total, 151 (IMJ) and 83 (non-IMJ contact) pairs of adjacent mitochondria were analyzed, for a total of 302 and 166 mitochondria. If cristae were perfectly aligned, the resulting angle between them resulted in a 0° angle, whereas complete non-alignment resulted in a 90° incident angle. In addition, cristae orientation relative to the IMJ contact site tangent was determined for each mitochondrion, and angles analyzed.
Mito-mito linker experiments
To test if physically tethering mitochondria to one another could increase OMM electron density and influence cristae organization, we used an engineered synthetic mito-mito linker system in mammalian cells. RBL-2H3 rat cells (ATCC) were transiently co-transfected with two constructs consisting of 1) OMM targeting sequence (mAKAP1(34-63)), linker domain FKBP12, and fluorophore YFP (mAKAP1-FKBP12-YFP); and 2) mAKAP1(34-63) linker domain FRB, and fluorophore mRFP (mAKAP1-FRB-mRFP). mAKAP1-FRB-mRFP was created by replacing the N-terminal targeting sequence of Lyn in the PM-FRB-mRFP construct (PMID: 22357943) with the coding sequence of mAKAP 34-63 resulting an identical linker (DPTRSANSGAGAGAGAILSR) with the one between AKAP and FKBP. To induce heterodimerization of the FKBP/FRB linker pair 100nM rapamycin was applied44. As a result, pairs of mitochondria become stably tethered after 30 minutes (see Figure 4).
Cells were cultured and transiently transfected with plasmid DNA by electroporation using 4.5 × 106 cells + 20 μg of each cDNA in 250 μl medium. Electroporation was performed with a BTX-830 square-pulse generator in a 4-mm gap cuvette using a single 250-V 13-ms pulse15. Transfection efficiency was approximately 50%. Ten to fifteen minutes prior to induction of linkage, cells were transferred to a Ca2+-free media. Induction was initiated by incubation with rapamycin. Live cell imaging was conducted on a Zeiss LSM 780 inverted confocal microscope system (63x, 1.4 N.A oil objective, 70 nm pixel size). Cells were then fixed in a 2% glutaraldehyde and 0.5% tannic acid solution in 0.1M cacodylate, buffer (pH 7.4) for 15 minutes. Fixed cells were then liberated from the dish using a cell scraper and further processed for transmission EM embedding as described earlier44. Membrane electron density and cristae abundance per surface area was performed exactly as for cardiomyocytes. Cultured cells possessed too few cristae to analyze cristae orientation and alignment.
Statistical analyses
Student’s t-tests or Mann-Whitney, one-way ANOVA, 99% confidence intervals and chi-square tests were performed in Prism 6.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to the following individuals for their critical comments, technical assistance or for providing images: Yan Burelle, Virgilio Cadete, Clara Franzini-Armstrong, Piotr Kopinsky, Marc Liesa, Heidi McBride, Ray Meade, Xilma Ortiz-Gonzalez and Orian Shirihai, This work was supported by a Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) Fellowship to MP, Simon Foundation grant 205844 and NIH grants R01-NS21328, R01-DK73691, R01-Ca143351 to DCW, R01-DK051526 to GH, and R01-HL59888 to GD.
Footnotes
Additional Information
This article contains Supplementary Figures 1–3, and Supplementary Video 1.
Authors contributions
M.P., M.J.M. and G.S. prepared samples for electron microscopy and imaged them. M.P. and D.W. performed tomography experiments. P.V. engineered the synthetic linker system. M.P. performed analyses and prepared figures with G.C. and M.J.M. G.W.D. provided the mitofusin deficient mice. G.H. oversaw the experiments. M.P., M.J.M and D.C.W. wrote the manuscript. All authors contributed to the final version of the manuscript.
Competing financial interests
The authors have no competing financial interests.
References
- 1.Klecker T, Bockler S, Westermann B. Making connections: interorganelle contacts orchestrate mitochondrial behavior. Trends Cell Biol. 2014;24:737–745. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2014.04.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Archer SL. Mitochondrial dynamics--mitochondrial fission and fusion in human diseases. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:2236–2251. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1215233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Braschi E, McBride HM. Mitochondria and the culture of the Borg: Understanding the integration of mitochondrial function within the reticulum, the cell, and the organism. Bioessays. 2010;32:958–966. doi: 10.1002/bies.201000073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kasahara A, Cipolat S, Chen Y, Dorn GW, 2nd, Scorrano L. Mitochondrial fusion directs cardiomyocyte differentiation via calcineurin and Notch signaling. Science. 2013;342:734–737. doi: 10.1126/science.1241359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Picard M, Burelle Y. Mitochondria: Starving to reach quorum? Bioessays. 2012;34 doi: 10.1002/bies.201100179. In Press. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ng WL, Bassler BL. Bacterial quorum-sensing network architectures. Annu Rev Genet. 2009;43:197–222. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genet-102108-134304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Santo-Domingo J, Giacomello M, Poburko D, Scorrano L, Demaurex N. OPA1 promotes pH flashes that spread between contiguous mitochondria without matrix protein exchange. EMBO J. 2013;32:1927–1940. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2013.124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ichas F, Jouaville LS, Mazat JP. Mitochondria are excitable organelles capable of generating and conveying electrical and calcium signals. Cell. 1997;89:1145–1153. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80301-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kurz FT, Aon MA, O’Rourke B, Armoundas AA. Spatio-temporal oscillations of individual mitochondria in cardiac myocytes reveal modulation of synchronized mitochondrial clusters. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107:14315–14320. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1007562107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Garcia-Perez C, Roy SS, Naghdi S, Lin X, Davies E, Hajnoczky G. Bid-induced mitochondrial membrane permeabilization waves propagated by local reactive oxygen species (ROS) signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109:4497–4502. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1118244109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Pacher P, Hajnoczky G. Propagation of the apoptotic signal by mitochondrial waves. EMBO J. 2001;20:4107–4121. doi: 10.1093/emboj/20.15.4107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Huang X, et al. Kissing and nanotunneling mediate intermitochondrial communication in the heart. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110:2846–2851. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1300741110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Amchenkova AA, Bakeeva LE, Chentsov YS, Skulachev VP, Zorov DB. Coupling membranes as energy-transmitting cables. I. Filamentous mitochondria in fibroblasts and mitochondrial clusters in cardiomyocytes. J Cell Biol. 1988;107:481–495. doi: 10.1083/jcb.107.2.481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Duvert M, Mazat JP, Barets AL. Intermitochondrial junctions in the heart of the frog, Rana esculenta. A thin-section and freeze-fracture study. Cell Tissue Res. 1985;241:129–137. doi: 10.1007/BF00214634. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Csordas G, et al. Structural and functional features and significance of the physical linkage between ER and mitochondria. J Cell Biol. 2006;174:915–921. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200604016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Pfanner N, et al. Uniform nomenclature for the mitochondrial contact site and cristae organizing system. J Cell Biol. 2014;204:1083–1086. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201401006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Jans DC, et al. STED super-resolution microscopy reveals an array of MINOS clusters along human mitochondria. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110:8936–8941. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1301820110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Mannella CA. Structure and dynamics of the mitochondrial inner membrane cristae. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2006;1763:542–548. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2006.04.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Frezza C, et al. OPA1 controls apoptotic cristae remodeling independently from mitochondrial fusion. Cell. 2006;126:177–189. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.06.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Khalifat N, Fournier JB, Angelova MI, Puff N. Lipid packing variations induced by pH in cardiolipin-containing bilayers: the driving force for the cristae-like shape instability. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2011;1808:2724–2733. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2011.07.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Dikov D, Bereiter-Hahn J. Inner membrane dynamics in mitochondria. Journal of structural biology. 2013;183:455–466. doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2013.06.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Graham BH, Waymire KG, Cottrell B, Trounce IA, MacGregor GR, Wallace DC. A mouse model for mitochondrial myopathy and cardiomyopathy resulting from a deficiency in the heart/muscle isoform of the adenine nucleotide translocator. Nat Genet. 1997;16:226–234. doi: 10.1038/ng0797-226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Lin CS, et al. Mouse mtDNA mutant model of Leber hereditary optic neuropathy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109:20065–20070. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1217113109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Gammaitoni L. Energy dissipation in small-scale shape-change dynamics. Physical review E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics. 2012;85:020104. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.85.020104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Picard M, et al. Acute exercise remodels mitochondrial membrane interactions in mouse skeletal muscle. J Appl Physiol. 2013;115:1562–1571. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00819.2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Shornikova MV. Intermitochondrial contacts in a system of cardiomyocyte mitochondriome in a normal state, under physiological stress, and in pathology. Ontogenez. 2000;31:470–475. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Hackenbrock CR. Ultrastructural bases for metabolically linked mechanical activity in mitochondria. II. Electron transport-linked ultrastructural transformations in mitochondria. J Cell Biol. 1968;37:345–369. doi: 10.1083/jcb.37.2.345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Shutt T, Geoffrion M, Milne R, McBride HM. The intracellular redox state is a core determinant of mitochondrial fusion. EMBO Rep. 2012;13:909–915. doi: 10.1038/embor.2012.128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Chen Y, Liu Y, Dorn GW., 2nd Mitochondrial fusion is essential for organelle function and cardiac homeostasis. Circ Res. 2011;109:1327–1331. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.111.258723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Skulachev VP. Mitochondrial filaments and clusters as intracellular power-transmitting cables. Trends Biochem Sci. 2001;26:23–29. doi: 10.1016/s0968-0004(00)01735-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Darch SE, West SA, Winzer K, Diggle SP. Density-dependent fitness benefits in quorum-sensing bacterial populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109:8259–8263. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1118131109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Zhou L, O’Rourke B. Cardiac mitochondrial network excitability: insights from computational analysis. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2012;302:H2178–2189. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.01073.2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Yaniv Y, Juhaszova M, Wang S, Fishbein KW, Zorov DB, Sollott SJ. Analysis of mitochondrial 3D-deformation in cardiomyocytes during active contraction reveals passive structural anisotropy of orthogonal short axes. PLoS One. 2011;6:e21985. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Kurz FT, Aon MA, O’Rourke B, Armoundas AA. Cardiac mitochondria exhibit dynamic functional clustering. Frontiers in physiology. 2014;5:329. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2014.00329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Mannella CA, Lederer WJ, Jafri MS. The connection between inner membrane topology and mitochondrial function. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2013;62:51–57. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2013.05.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Strauss M, Hofhaus G, Schroder RR, Kuhlbrandt W. Dimer ribbons of ATP synthase shape the inner mitochondrial membrane. EMBO J. 2008;27:1154–1160. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2008.35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Cogliati S, et al. Mitochondrial cristae shape determines respiratory chain supercomplexes assembly and respiratory efficiency. Cell. 2013;155:160–171. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.08.032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Cortassa S, Aon MA. Computational modeling of mitochondrial function. Methods Mol Biol. 2012;810:311–326. doi: 10.1007/978-1-61779-382-0_19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Bhandari P, Song M, Chen Y, Burelle Y, Dorn GW., 2nd Mitochondrial contagion induced by Parkin deficiency in Drosophila hearts and its containment by suppressing mitofusin. Circ Res. 2014;114:257–265. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.114.302734. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Chen Y, et al. Mitofusin 2-containing mitochondrial-reticular microdomains direct rapid cardiomyocyte bioenergetic responses via interorganelle Ca(2+) crosstalk. Circ Res. 2012;111:863–875. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.112.266585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Picard M, White K, Turnbull DM. Mitochondrial morphology, topology, and membrane interactions in skeletal muscle: a quantitative three-dimensional electron microscopy study. J Appl Physiol. 2013;114:161–171. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01096.2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Mastronarde DN. Automated electron microscope tomography using robust prediction of specimen movements. Journal of structural biology. 2005;152:36–51. doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2005.07.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Kremer JR, Mastronarde DN, McIntosh JR. Computer visualization of three-dimensional image data using IMOD. Journal of structural biology. 1996;116:71–76. doi: 10.1006/jsbi.1996.0013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Csordas G, et al. Imaging interorganelle contacts and local calcium dynamics at the ER-mitochondrial interface. Mol Cell. 2010;39:121–132. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.06.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.