Abstract
Epilepsy is more prevalent in populations with high measures of stress, but the neurobiological mechanisms are unclear. Stress is a common precipitant of seizures in individuals with epilepsy, and may provoke seizures by several mechanisms including changes in neurotransmitter and hormone levels within the brain. Importantly, stress during sensitive periods early in life contributes to ‘brain programming’, influencing neuronal function and brain networks. However, it is unclear if early-life stress influences limbic excitability and promotes epilepsy. Here we used an established, naturalistic model of chronic early-life stress (CES), and employed chronic cortical and limbic video-EEGs combined with molecular and cellular techniques to probe the contributions of stress to age-specific epilepsies and network hyperexcitability and identify the underlying mechanisms.
In control male rats, EEGs obtained throughout development were normal and no seizures were observed. EEGs demonstrated epileptic spikes and spike series in the majority of rats experiencing CES, and 57% of CES rats developed seizures: Behavioral events resembling the human age-specific epilepsy infantile spasms occurred in 11/23 (48%), accompanied by EEG spikes and/or electrodecrements, and two additional rats (9%) developed limbic seizures that involved the amygdala. Probing for stress-dependent, endogenous convulsant molecules within amygdala, we examined the expression of the pro-convulsant neuropeptide corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH), and found a significant increase of amygdalar--but not cortical--CRH expression in adolescent CES rats.
In conclusion, CES of limited duration has long-lasting effects on brain excitability and may promote age-specific seizures and epilepsy. Whereas the mechanisms involved require further study, these findings provide important insights into environmental contributions to early-life seizures.
Keywords: stress, seizures, epilepsy, infantile spasms, corticotropin releasing hormone, amygdala
1. Introduction
Stress is a common precipitant of seizures in individuals with epilepsy [1–6], and may provoke seizures by several mechanisms including changes in neurotransmitter and hormone levels within the brain [6–9]. In addition, an age-dependent epilepsy of infants called infantile spasms (IS), responds to the stress hormones ACTH and prednisone/prednisolone [10–13]. The mechanisms of the anticonvulsant effects of these hormones might involve a suppression of the endogenous proconvulsant stress peptide corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) [7,14–16]. These facts illustrate that there is a complex relationship between stress and seizures, with important clinical implications.
Whereas much remains to be learned about stress, seizures and epilepsy in the mature brain [8,9], even less is known about pro-convulsant and pro-epileptic effects of stress early in life [7,14,17,18]. There is epidemiological evidence for increased incidence of epilepsy in children growing up in presumably stressful, resource-poor environments [19], yet the effects of early-life stress on the risk of developing epilepsy have been little studied in humans [20, 21]. In rodent models, stress during development is pro-convulsant in several models of seizures and epilepsy: Prenatal maternal restraint increases the severity of status epilepticus [22], enhances the effects of postnatal N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor agonists [18,23], decreases afterdischarge threshold and enhances kindling rates [24]. Early postnatal stress increases seizure susceptibility in several models of seizures including amygdala kindling, freeze lesion followed by hyperthermic seizures and chemo-convulsant-induced seizures [25–27].
These data suggest that both prenatal and early postnatal stresses enhance vulnerability to seizures. Perinatal and early-life stresses take place during critical periods of brain development when synapses form, networks get established and environmental signals may have long-lasting effects [28]. Stress may influence all of these processes and may alter brain circuits, cellular properties, and synaptic connections [14,29]. These changes, in turn, may render the individual more vulnerable to seizures and epilepsy via poorly understood interactions with a number of stress mediators [8,30–32].
In addition to the effects of stress on seizure susceptibility, early-life stress might provoke the emergence of spontaneous seizures (epileptogenesis). This is an important question, because epilepsy, especially childhood-onset epilepsy, is associated with adverse consequences: children with epilepsy perform worse than expected in school, employment, marriage, and parenthood [33,34]. They have increase prevalence of depression and intellectual dysfunction [35,36]. Findings in animal models of seizures support detrimental effects of seizures on cognition and emotion [37–39].
To examine directly whether sustained early-life stress promotes hyperexcitability and epilepsy, we used a well characterized model of chronic early-life stress (CES) [40–42]. We then probed the mechanisms underlying these stress-provoked changes to brain-network excitability.
2. Material and methods
2.1. Animals
Subjects were progeny of timed-pregnancy Sprague-Dawley rats. Rats were maintained in quiet facilities under controlled temperatures and light-dark cycle. Cages were monitored every 12 hours for the presence of pups and the date of birth was considered postnatal day (P) 0. Pups were mixed among litters, and litter size was adjusted to 12 per dam if necessary, to obviate the potential confounding effects of genetic variables and of litter size. Litters of all experimental groups contained equal numbers of males. When weaned (on P21), male rats were housed 2–3 per cage. All experiments were performed in accordance with the National Institutes of Health (NIH) guidelines on laboratory animal welfare and approved by the University of California-Irvine Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.
2.2. The chronic early-life stress paradigm
CES was induced in rat pups from P2 to P9 as described previously [40,42,43]. Stress in pups was provoked by unpredictable and fragmented nurturing behaviors of rat dams [44]. These behaviors, in turn were induced by equipping the cages with limited nesting material that prevented the dam from constructing a satisfactory nest and altered her behavior [42,43]. Briefly, on P2, pups (male and female) from several litters were mixed among dams and those assigned to the CES groups were transferred to cages with limited bedding and nesting material. Specifically, cages were fitted with a plastic coated aluminum mesh platform to sit approximately 2.5 cm above the cage floor. Bedding was reduced to only cover the cage floor sparsely, and one-half of a paper towel was provided for nesting maternal. Control dams and pups resided in bedded cages, containing ~0.33 cubic feet of sanitary chips. Control and experimental cages were undisturbed during P2–P9. Maternal nursing behaviors were monitored during the week of CES as described [43]. At P21, pups were weaned, and male pups were used for the experiments.
2.3. Electrode implantation
Animals (n = 36, 23 CES and 13 controls) underwent surgery at P11 – P15. Two EEG systems were used: a tethered and a telemetric. For the tethered setup, a first rat cohort (6 CES and 4 control) was implanted with bipolar stainless steel electrodes (Plastics One, Roanoke, VA) in both hippocampi (coordinates: AP −2.0, L 1.8, V −2.6 mm with reference to Bregma) [45], and with 7 dural screw-electrodes over the parietal frontal and temporal cortices. A second cohort of rats (11 CES and 5 control) was implanted bilaterally with bipolar electrodes in amygdala (coordinates: AP −1.6, L 3.6, V −8.4 mm with reference to Bregma) as well as with one electrode over the right fronto-parietal cortex. The amygdala electrodes (twisted wires) were connected in a sequential manner in a bipolar montage. The electrode going to grid 2 of the first derivation was also connected to grid 1 of the next derivation.
To record from the surface of the cortex, stainless steel insulated electrodes (E363) were used and consisted of electrodes with mounting screw and socket contact. A surface electrode positioned over the cerebellum was used as a ground electrode for all electrode assemblies used here. The intracranial electrodes used in this study (Plastic One; E363/2-2TW) were made of a stainless steel wire (bare diameter 200 μm) insulated with polyimide (electrode diameter insulated 230 μm) and ending with a female socket contact. The electrodes were supplied twisted together, i.e., bipolar electrodes. The insulation at the tip level was removed for the terminal 0.1 mm, and tips separated by 1mm. Screws were placed over the cortex and dental acrylic was used to anchor the electrodes to the pedestal. We recorded potentials either between two cortical electrodes, one in the left and one in the right fronto-parietal cortices; or between one of the twisted electrodes in the right amygdala and the right cortical electrode. The electrodes were connected through a pedestal to EEG leads (6 channel electrode cable with 363 plug; Plastics One Roanoke, VA).
For the telemetry system, a third rat cohort (6 CES and 4 controls) was implanted with bipolar electrodes in the right amygdala and with two dural electrodes over the right and left fronto-parietal cortices. The telemetry transmitter allows simultaneous recordings of two channels. Each channel received input from the 2 wires of one intra-amygdala bipolar electrode. The radiotelemetry unit (the two-channel PhysioTel Implantable Transmitter F20-EET; Data Sciences International [DSI], St Paul, MN, USA) was positioned in a pocket created subcutaneously in the rat flank through a scalp incision. All electrodes were fixed in place with dental acrylic and connected to the leads of the radiotelemetry unit, and then covered and fixed to the skull with dental acrylic cement.
For all rats, electrode placement was verified post hoc [47], and they were all located in amygdala or hippocampus as intended. Because of the size of the amygdaloid complex in neonatal rats, we can comfortably state only that all electrode tips were in the central nucleus or medial portion of the basolateral nucleus.
2.4. Long-term digital video-EEG recordings
After a day of recovery, experimental and control rats were recorded via one of the two systems described above: The tethered system employed bio-amplifiers using Powerlab 8SP (AD Instruments, Grand Junction, CO) equipped with Chart 4 for Windows. This software was used to acquire the data, with band-pass frequency filters of 0.1 and 200Hz, a notch filter at 60Hz, and a sampling rate of 400Hz. Video was acquired using a commercial webcam (Logitech Quickcam, Ultra Vision; Logitech International) that was synchronized with the EEG. The telemetric system employed the Dataquest A.R.T. acquisition system (DSI). The transmitters broadcasted digitized data via radio frequency signals to PhysioTel Receivers (RPC-1). The receivers converted the telemetry information to a form readily accessible by DSI’s Dataquest platform. The sampling rate was 100Hz and the video was captured using four analogue cameras (Samsung SDN-550N) connected to a network video server (Axis Q7404 4 channels video encoder) synchronized to the EEGs.
Digital video EEG recordings were conducted for 2–4 weeks as described previously [46,47]. To avoid maternal rejection and inanition or cannibalism, pups were recorded intermittently prior to weaning. When using the tethered system, animals were recorded for an hour a day, and the order of recording was rotated to avoid potential diurnal variability in brain excitability. When employing the telemetry system, rats were recorded for two hours a day until P21. After weaning, continuous digital video EEG recordings were conducted.
2.5. Video and EEG review and analysis
Investigators unaware of the experimental group-status of each rat-EEG first analyzed the EEGs visually, scanning for seizures and for interictal activity and excluding potential motion artifacts (56). The concurrent video-recordings were analyzed for behavioral epileptic manifestations. To classify an event as a potential seizure, both EEG- and behavioral phenomena were required. Electrographically, seizures were defined as events consisting of spikes (inflections characterized by duration of <50 mSec and amplitude > 2 fold background) that lasted more than 6 seconds. Whereas there are numerous operational definitions of seizures, none is satisfactory, and we chose 6 seconds as a minimum duration because this is twice the reported duration required for alteration of consciousness in absence seizures in children, and because it is conventional in rodent models [46–49]. Additionally, the EEGs were analyzed using the seizure detection module of the Neuroscore software (DSI).
2.6. In Situ Hybridization Histochemistry (ISH) for CRH mRNA
In situ hybridization histochemistry was performed on a separate cohort consisting of CES and control rats that were sacrificed on P19. The ISH method has been described in detail previously [41,42]. Briefly, 20 μm coronal sections were collected on gelatin-coated slides and stored at −80°C. Sections were thawed, air dried, fixed in pa raformaldehyde, dehydrated, and rehydrated through graded ethanols, then exposed to 0.25% acetic anhydride in 0.1 M triethanolamine (pH 8) and dehydrated. Prehybridization and hybridization steps were performed at 40°C in a humidified chamber. Following one hour of prehybridization, sections were hybridized overnight (20 hours) with a deoxyoligonucleotide probe complementary to the coding region of CRH mRNA and 3′-end-labeled with 35S-dATP. Sections were then washed and apposed to film (Hyperfilm β-Max; Amersham, Arlington Heights, IL) for 7–14 days.
2.7. CRH immunocytochemistry
Immunocytochemistry (ICC) was performed on a separate cohort of rats (3 control and 3 CES). Briefly, juvenile rats (P45) were euthanized with sodium pentobarbital and perfused with fresh 4% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer (PB; pH 7.4, 4°C). Brains were cryoprotected and stored, then sectioned coronally into 20 μm thick slices using a cryostat. CRH ICC was performed on free-floating sections as previously described [50]. Briefly, after washing (3 × 5 min) with 0.01 M PBS containing 0.3% Triton X-100 (PBS-T; pH 7.4), sections were treated for 30 min in 0.3% H2O2/PBS, followed by blockade of nonspecific sites with 5% normal goat serum in PBS for 30 min. After rinsing, sections were incubated for 2 d at 4°C with rabbit anti-CRH antiserum (1:20,000; a gift from Dr. W. W. Vale, Salk Institute) in PBS containing 1% bovine serum albumin, and washed in PBS-T. Sections were incubated in biotinylated goat-anti-rabbit IgG (1:200; Vector Laboratories) in PBS for 2 h at room temperature. After washing, sections were incubated in the avidin–biotin–peroxidase complex (ABC) solution (1:100; Vector Laboratories) for 2 h and rinsed (3 × 5 min PBS-T), and the reaction product was visualized by incubating the sections in 0.04% 3,3′-diaminobenzidine (DAB) containing 0.01% H2O2. Sections were mounted on poly-L-lysine-coated slides and coverslipped with Permount (Fisher Scientific).
2.8. RNA isolation and quantitative reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR)
The amygdalae were dissected using pre-chilled RNase free instruments under a light microscope, and processed immediately. Total RNA was isolated from the tissue using the RNeasy mini kit (Qiagen) as per manufacturer’s protocol. RNA purity and quantity was determined using a nanodrop (Thermo Scientific). 1 μg of RNA was converted to cDNA with random hexamers using transcriptor first strand cDNA synthesis kit following manufacturer’s protocol (Roche). Sybr Green PCR analysis was performed using cDNA samples in triplicate on a Roche Lightcycler 96 system (Roche) for CRH and GAPDH transcripts. GAPDH served as the internal control, and relative quantification of mRNA expression was determined using the cycle threshold method (2^−ΔΔCt). Minus-reverse transcription and non-template controls were used to eliminate the possibility of genomic contamination or false positive analyses.
Primer Sequences were: CRH: (fwd: 5′-GAAACTCAGAGCCCAAGTACGTTGAG -3′; rev: 5′-GTTGTTCTGCGAGGTACCTCTCTCAG -3′). GAPDH: (fwd 5′-ATGCCATCACTGCCACTCAGA -3′; rev 5′-ACCAGTGGATGCAGGGATGAT -3′)
2.9. Statistical analyses
Data are expressed as mean and standard error of the mean. To assess the statistical significance of the presence of seizures, epileptiform spike series and bi-phasic spasm-like events in the CES group, we performed a one sample t-test comparing their probability to 0. Presence of any seizures, any spike series or of any ‘spasms’ was assigned a value of 1. Analyses of CRH optical density in amygdala and of CRH-immunoreactive cell numbers in frontoparietal/somatosensory cortex employed Student’s t-test unless noted otherwise. Significance for all analyses was set at P<0.05.
3. Results
3.1. Chronic early-life stress leads to network hyper-excitability and seizures in a subset of rats
Several types of abnormal neuronal network excitability emerged in the CES rats during the days following the stress, and none were observed in the controls. These manifestations of hyper-excitable brain included spike series in amygdala-EEG, electrographic seizures associated with limbic behavioral features (3 of 23 rats), and sudden flexion-type events reminiscent of infantile seizures in humans (11 of 23 rats). In all, these events involved 14 of 23 rats (61%; t5.85;22 p < 0.0001; one sample t-test).
3.2 Abnormal limbic EEGs and limbic seizures arise in a minority of CES rats
Aberrant limbic network activity developed in a subset of rats experiencing CES and in none of the concurrently studied controls. These abnormalities were apparent from the presence of spike series in two of 23 rats (shown in Fig. 1A, B). These spike series were observed during eight of 16 recording days in one rat, and in 7 of 17 recording days in the other, and were spread throughout the recording period in both. The spike series were apparent only in bipolar intra-amygdala EEGs, suggesting their limbic origin. Frank limbic epileptic events took place in two CES rats and consisted of limbic seizures which were diagnosed on both EEG and on the concurrent videos (Fig. 2). The seizures, lasting 6–70 seconds (sec), occurred on day 24 or 25 of life, i.e., in weanlings, in which hippocampal development approximates that of young children [52]. Specifically, one rat had two seizures 90 sec apart (durations: 62 and 41 sec) on P25; the seizures arose first in the left amygdala and propagated rapidly to the right amygdala-cortex lead (A1, B1 in Fig. 2). The second rat had one overt seizure (duration: 7 sec) on P24, detected in the right amygdala. The same rat had abnormal, epileptiform activity manifest as spike series throughout the monitoring period of P18–P32.
The behavioral manifestations of the seizures were typical for limbic seizures: sudden cessation of activity (Racine stage 0) [52] accompanied by facial automatisms (Racine stage 1) and prolonged immobility with staring. A body jerk signaled the onset and the end of the events. Thus, CES during postnatal days 2–9 led to overt, spontaneous seizures in 2/23 (9%) of subjects and to amygdala seizures and/or spike series in 3/23 (13%). However, the majority of abnormal network hyper-excitability following CES manifested as abnormal age-specific events (in 11/23; rats, 48%) described below.
3.2. Chronic early-life stress provokes age-specific epileptic events
In humans, certain seizure types and epilepsies are strongly age-dependent. Infantile spasms are a severe and relatively common epilepsy syndrome of infancy that responds to stress hormones [10–13,16]. In addition, levels of ACTH and cortisol were found to be abnormal in CSF of infants with IS [53]. These findings suggested that stress and stress mediators might be involved in the hyper-excitability involved in these types of developmental seizures [7,14,21,31,54]. Therefore, we examined for spasm-like events in rats exposed to CES. Bi-phasic, spasm-like events were detected between P17 to 35 in 11 CES rats (48%) (Fig. 3A–C). This number is likely an underestimate, because prior to P21 rats were recorded only for 1–2 hours per day. The behavioral manifestations consisted of bi-phasic motions, i.e., rapid flexion of head and body and a slower phase of relaxation (see sequence of two events in Fig. 3A). The EEG accompaniments of these events were typically a spike or series of spikes followed by a short period of reduced voltage, reminiscent of those observed in spasms of human infants. These were found in all 6 rats with amygdala electrodes (Fig. 3B), and in 3 of 5 rats in whom the location of the electrodes was hippocampal or cortical (the technical quality of the remaining 2 precluded critical analysis). The majority of rats (6/11) had several spasm-like events over several days, as shown in Fig. 3C, where color-coded triangles denote each of these rats, and in Fig. 3D. Other rats were observed to have several spasms during a single day, and two rats had a single event only during the short time-windows of video and EEG monitoring.
3.3. Effects of chronic early-life stress on amygdala expression of CRH
The presence of spontaneous ictal events, both spasm-like and limbic seizures in immature rats that had experienced CES indicated intrinsic hyper-excitability of the limbic circuit. In addition, the electrographic data suggested a strong involvement of the amygdala. Indeed, this limbic region has been strongly implicated in a number of developmental seizures in rodent models [55–57]. These findings provided impetus for identifying pro-convulsant, stress-dependent molecules within the amygdala. CRH is an excitatory and pro-convulsant peptide [58,59] that provokes amygdala-based limbic seizures in immature rodents [56]. In addition, acute or intermittent early-life stress is known to increase CRH expression in a number of brain regions including amygdala [60,61]. Therefore, we asked whether CES resulted in augmented CRH expression levels in the amygdala of immature rats. We first estimated CRH mRNA levels in the central amygdala nucleus at the onset of the spasm-like events (P19) using ISH, and found a borderline significant difference between the rats that experienced CES and the control group (0.12 ± 0.01 and 0.08 ± 0.002, n = 3–4 per group; p = 0.044, Mann-Whitney test; Fig. 4E). qRT-PCR analyses of dissected amygdalae (n = 8 CES, 7 controls) yielded large variances and no conclusive results. Therefore, we looked more directly at peptide expression and examined a somewhat later time-point. Because the majority of amygdala CRH is found in fibers, we employed immunohistochemistry and evaluated optical density of CRH-immunoreactive (ir) signal in carefully matched sections of the central nucleus of amygdala without knowledge of groups. In rats sacrificed on P45, CRH-ir was significantly increased in rats experiencing chronic early-life stress compared to controls (p = 0.048; Fig. 4A, C). The augmentation of CRH expression was selective, and was not observed in cortical regions of the same rats. In the cortex (and hippocampus) the number of neurons in a given area that express CRH at levels detectable using immunohistochemistry provides a reliable measure of expression levels of the peptide [50,61]. Therefore, we counted the numbers of CRH-ir neurons per unit area (Fig. 4B, D) and found no significant differences attributable to CES (per 2 mm2, controls: 36.3 ± 2.1; CES: 35.8 ± 13.2; p = 0.97 t-test with Welch correction for unequal variance). Whereas immunohistochemistry may not be fully quantitative, these data suggest that CES augmented the expression of CRH in amygdala and not in cortex in an enduring manner. Elevated peptide levels and release, in turn, should strongly increase network excitability [31,58,59].
4. Discussion
The studies described here are the first to examine the effects of chronic early-postnatal stress on increased excitability in hippocampal-amygdala circuits. They also report on technically challenging daily EEG and video recordings in pre-weanling rats, during developmental periods in the rodent that are parallel to infancy and childhood in humans [51]. They demonstrate that CES provokes abnormal hyper-excitability in the majority (61%) of developing rats. This hyper-excitability is apparent as EEG spike series, flexion-type seizures and/or limbic seizures. Finally, the findings support the notion that the mechanisms of hyper-excitability might involve augmented levels of the proconvulsant peptide, CRH, in seizure-prone limbic structures including the amygdala.
4.1 Studying the consequences of chronic early-life stress on excitability in hippocampal-amygdala circuits of ‘infant’ and ‘pre-adolescent’ rodents
Whereas it is difficult to provide objective measures of CES in humans, low socioeconomic status (SES) is commonly considered a surrogate measure. In accord, the prevalence and incidence of epilepsy is higher in resource-poor countries and in children and adults from low SES [19,62, but see 63]. Surprisingly, it has been difficult to generate models of CES in neonatal rodents [43]. Most studies have relied on intermittent or acute maternal separation that, in turn, provokes intermittent or acute stress in pups. Here we employed a paradigm of chronic stress that lasts for a week and is characterized by persistently augmented stress-hormone levels and even adrenal hypertrophy, a hallmark of chronic stress [40–42]. The continuous stress in pups derives from a fragmented and unpredictable maternal care, induced by simulation of low SES in the rodent cages by limiting nesting and bedding available to the dam [42,44]. This provokes stress in the dam [43] and alters her nurturing behaviors [43]. This paradigm enables probing the consequences of bone fide chronic early-life stress on brain excitability, seizures and epilepsy. We also successfully recorded EEG chronically in pre-weanling rats, a technical challenge because of potential inanition or maternal cannibalism. These combined advances enabled us to detect EEG markers of network hyper-excitability [64] and seizures in the majority of CES rats already during development.
The possibility might be considered, that a “second hit” comprised of being tethered to the EEG and being monitored might lead to epilepsy. As we have not found this in control rats, the remaining fined argument is that the second hit might provoke epilepsy only in stress-compromised rats but not in controls. The stress of the theoretical second hit might be divided into 2 components: the stress of surgery and the stress of video-monitoring. We have measured stress hormones in implanted rodents, and by days later, corticosterone levels were similar to those of un-implanted controls (65). We also reported that the early-life stress does not appear to increase the neuroendocrine response to a second stress in either adolescent (66) or adult (67) rats). The remote possibility that the merely being tethered might provoke epilepsy in prior-stressed rodents cannot be fully excluded.
4.2. Typical seizures arise in a minority of immature CES rats
The consequences of early-life stress on epileptogenesis have been a topic of intense interest [8,14]. In the majority of experimental approaches in rodents, pre-, peri- or postnatal stresses or glucocorticoids were applied to dams and pups were tested for their susceptibility to chemical convulsants or kindling [24–27,54]. To our knowledge, the current study is the first to demonstrate that CES leads directly to spontaneous epileptic events including seizures without a second hit. The reason for the low number of typical spontaneous limbic seizures in our cohort is unclear. The low detection rate might derive from intermittent recordings in pre-weanling rats. It is also possible that limbic seizures are not typical in immature rodents, and more epileptic phenomena are flexion-spasm like events associated with epileptiform EEGs. Indeed, flexion-type seizures have been reported in immature rats challenged with NMDA [18,23,68]; hyperthermia [57], a triad of brain insults [69] or genetic mutations [70,71]. Not surprisingly, these types of events constituted the majority of ictal events observed here.
It is unlikely that genetic or traumatic factors provoked the hyper-excitability reported here. We excluded the presence of brain injury by examining brains postmortem. In addition, the rat strain used has no known spontaneous seizures or EEG abnormalities, (though some have reported absence-like events later in life). Over the years, we have recorded EEGs and videos from over 100 control rats and found no abnormalities.
4.3. Flexion seizures in immature CES rats resemble human infantile spasms
The appearance of seizures in humans and rodents is age-specific, and this might result from immature stages of development that promote seizure propagation in certain circuits and prevent their propagation via other, less mature networks 71–74] The age-specific epilepsy, infantile spasms, is characterized by rapid flexion of the head and torso, followed by a longer persistent flexion and relaxation [10–12,16,75]. In a number of genetic and pharmacological immature rodent models, as well as the CES model described here, similar flexion seizures have been generated [18,68,70,71,76–78]. It has been far more difficult to generate in rodents the typical background EEG found in infants with IS. This is likely a result of dichotomous cortical development stages in humans and rodents [51,72,74], as well as the absence of sulci and gyri in the latter. To our knowledge, whereas a number of infantile spasm models have been generally accepted, chaotic, hypsarrhythmia-like pattern has been detected only in one [77].
Here, as in the majority of established rodent models, we recapitulate the behavioral manifestations of the seizures and find accompanying epileptiform discharges. We do not propose that the events provide an optimal model for IS: this is a controversial topic with differing opinions among experts [16,79]. We simply demonstrate that CES provokes hyper-excitability that results in the emergence of typical developmental spasm-like events.
4.4. Stress hormones as potential mechanisms of hyper-excitability and epilepsy after CES
How might CES increase brain excitability? Stress effects on the brain involve the canonic hypothalamic pituitary adrenal (HPA) axis, as well as a number of networks including a limbic-neuroendocrine circuit [30,31,80]. The effects of stress on the brain are mediated by several types of molecules, including neurotransmitters, peptides and steroid hormones, which are candidates for mediating the influence of CES on network excitability. Corticosteroid hormones act via two nuclear receptor types [80], mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) that is highly expressed in limbic areas such as the hippocampus; and the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) ubiquitously expressed in the brain and enriched in the hippocampus. GR and MR activation can influence neuronal excitability through rapid nongenomic pathways [8,80], as well as via delayed, transcriptional regulation of the expression of hundreds of genes [8,30]. Functionally, GRs tend to normalize excitability that was raised during the initial stage of the stress response. Thus, in the context of stress, steroids augment excitability acutely, but their long-lasting effects are less clear.
The neuropeptide CRH may also mediate the effects of stress on excitability in the developing brain. Stress activates expression and release of CRH from CRH-expressing neurons in several limbic regions including hippocampus and amygdala [81]. The peptide increases the firing of CA1 pyramidal neurons in both mature and developing hippocampus, [58,59] and provokes limbic seizures that seem to commence in amygdala in immature rodents [56]. Activation and augmentation of CRH expression might take place during the numerous developmental insults that commonly precede human developmental epilepsies including IS. Rodent models suggest that treatment with ACTH directly suppresses amygdala CRH expression via melanocortin receptors [15,17,82]. In infants, ACTH at high doses is generally more effective in suppressing IS and the abnormal EEG associated with them, as compared to maximal doses of corticosteroids [11–13,16], and the additional ACTH efficacy might derive from direct effects on amygdala CRH. Thus, the current findings suggest that the mechanism of action of ACTH and corticosteroids in IS via their actions on the stress system rather than via other potential mechanisms such as anti-inflammatory effects [83,84].
4.5. Clinical relevance and implications
Infants and children with IS or epilepsy have evidence of abnormal stress hormone levels in the CSF [54] and cortex [32]. These facts, coupled with the universal response of some developmental seizures to stress hormones implicate stress as a contributor to early-life brain hyper-excitability, seizures and epilepsy. The current studies demonstrate that CES directly enhances brain excitability. Thus, CES might provoke frank epileptogenesis in a minority of affected infants and children, and contribute to vulnerability to seizures and epilepsy in a larger proportion. Because stress is largely unavoidable, uncovering the underlying mechanisms is vital for developing preventive interventions.
Acknowledgments
The research was supported by the National Institute of Health, RO1 NS28912, P50 MH096889 (TZB), and a generous gift from Questcor. The authors thank Barbara Cartwright for editorial help.
Footnotes
Potential Conflicts of Interest
The research was supported by the National Institute of Health, RO1 NS28912, P50 MH096889. Equipment (EEG, Telemtry, analysis software) used in the study was purchased using a gift from Questcor, Inc., received in 2009.
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
References
- 1.Temkin NR, Davis GR. Stress as a risk factor for seizures among adults with epilepsy. Epilepsia. 1984;25:450–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1984.tb03442.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Neugebauer R, Paik M, Hauser WA, Nadel E, Leppik I, Susser M. Stressful life events and seizure frequency in patients with epilepsy. Epilepsia. 1994;35:336–43. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1994.tb02441.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Frucht MM, Quigg M, Schwaner C, Fountain NB. Distribution of seizure precipitants among epilepsy syndromes. Epilepsia. 2000;41:1534–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1499-1654.2000.001534.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Spector S, Cull C, Goldstein LH. Seizure precipitants and perceived self-control of seizures in adults with poorly-controlled epilepsy. Epilepsy Res. 2000;38:207–16. doi: 10.1016/s0920-1211(99)00093-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Haut SR, Hall CB, Masur J, Lipton RB. Seizure occurrence: precipitants and prediction. Neurology. 2007;69:1905–10. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000278112.48285.84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Nakken KO, Solaas MH, Kjeldsen MJ, Friis ML, Pellock JM, Corey LA. Which seizure-precipitating factors do patients with epilepsy most frequently report? Epilepsy Behav. 2005;6:85–9. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2004.11.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Baram TZ. Pathophysiology of massive infantile spasms: perspective on the putative role of the brain adrenal axis. Ann Neurol. 1993;33:231–6. doi: 10.1002/ana.410330302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Joëls M. Stress, the hippocampus, and epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2009;50:586–97. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2008.01902.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Danzer SC. Depression, stress, epilepsy and adult neurogenesis. Exp Neurol. 2012;233:22–32. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2011.05.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Hrachovy RA, Frost JD, Jr, Kellaway P, Zion TE. Double-blind study of ACTH vs prednisone therapy in infantile spasms. J Pediatr. 1983;103:641–5. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(83)80606-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Snead OC, 3rd, Benton JW, Jr, Hosey LC, Swann JW, Spink D, Martin D, et al. Treatment of infantile spasms with high-dose ACTH: efficacy and plasma levels of ACTH and cortisol. Neurology. 1989;39:1027–31. doi: 10.1212/wnl.39.8.1027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Baram TZ, Mitchell WG, Tournay A, Snead OC, Hanson RA, Horton EJ. High-dose corticotropin (ACTH) versus prednisone for infantile spasms: a prospective, randomized, blinded study. Pediatrics. 1996;97:375–9. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Mackay MT, Weiss SK, Adams-Webber T, Ashwal S, Stephens D, Ballaban-Gill K, et al. Practice parameter: medical treatment of infantile spasms: report of the American Academy of Neurology and the Child Neurology Society. Neurology. 2004;62:1668–81. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000127773.72699.c8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Huang LT. Early-life stress impacts the developing hippocampus and primes seizure occurrence: cellular, molecular, and epigenetic mechanisms. Front Mol Neurosci. 2014;7:8. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2014.00008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Brunson KL, Khan N, Eghbal-Ahmadi M, Baram TZ. Corticotropin (ACTH) acts directly on amygdala neurons to down-regulate corticotropin-releasing hormone gene expression. Ann Neurol. 2001;49:304–12. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Stafstrom CE, Arnason BG, Baram TZ, Catania A, Cortez MA, Glauser TA, et al. Treatment of infantile spasms: emerging insights from clinical and basic science perspectives. J Child Neurol. 2011;26:1411–21. doi: 10.1177/0883073811413129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Hatalski CG, Guirguis C, Baram TZ. Corticotropin releasing factor mRNA expression in the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus and the central nucleus of the amygdala is modulated by repeated acute stress in the immature rat. J Neuroendocrinol. 1998;10:663–669. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2826.1998.00246.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Velísek L, Jehle K, Asche S, Velísková J. Model of infantile spasms induced by N-methyl-D-aspartic acid in prenatally impaired brain. Ann Neurol. 2007;61:109–19. doi: 10.1002/ana.21082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Shamansky SL, Glaser GH. Socioeconomic characteristics of childhood seizure disorders in the New Haven area: an epidemiologic study. Epilepsia. 1979;20:457–74. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1979.tb04828.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Li J, Vestergaard M, Obel C, Precht DH, Christensen J, Lu M, et al. Prenatal stress and epilepsy in later life: a nationwide follow-up study in Denmark. Epilepsy Res. 2008;81:52–7. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2008.04.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.van Campen JS, Jansen FE, Steinbusch LC, Joëls M, Braun KP. Stress sensitivity of childhood epilepsy is related to experienced negative life events. Epilepsia. 2012;53:1554–62. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2012.03566.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Sadaghiani MM, Saboory E. Prenatal stress potentiates pilocarpine-induced epileptic behaviors in infant rats both time and sex dependently. Epilepsy Behav. 2010;18:166–70. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2010.04.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Chachua T, Yum MS, Velíšková J, Velíšek L. Validation of the rat model of cryptogenic infantile spasms. Epilepsia. 2011;52:1666–77. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2011.03220.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Edwards HE, Dortok D, Tam J, Won D, Burnham WM. Prenatal stress alters seizure thresholds and the development of kindled seizures in infant and adult rats. Horm Behav. 2002;42:437–47. doi: 10.1006/hbeh.2002.1839. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Salzberg M, Kumar G, Supit L, Jones NC, Morris MJ, Rees S, et al. Early postnatal stress confers enduring vulnerability to limbic epileptogenesis. Epilepsia. 2007;48:2079–85. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2007.01246.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Desgent S, Duss S, Sanon NT, Lema P, Lévesque M, Hébert D, et al. Early-life stress is associated with gender-based vulnerability to epileptogenesis in rat pups. PLoS One. 2012;7:e42622. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0042622. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Schridde U, Strauss U, Brauer AU, van Luijtelaar G. Environmental manipulations early in development alter seizure activity, Ih and HCN1 protein expression later in life. Eur J Neurosci. 2006;23:3346–58. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2006.04865.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Bale TL, Baram TZ, Brown AS, Goldstein JM, Insel TR, McCarthy MM, et al. Early life programming and neurodevelopmental disorders. Biol Psychiatry. 2010;68:314–9. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.05.028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Brunson KL, Avishai-Eliner S, Hatalski CG, Baram TZ. Neurobiology of the stress response early in life: evolution of a concept and the role of corticotropin releasing hormone. Mol Psychiatry. 2001;6:647–56. doi: 10.1038/sj.mp.4000942. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.McEwen BS. Physiology and neurobiology of stress and adaptation: central role of the brain. Physiol Rev. 2007;87:873–904. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00041.2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Baram TZ, Hatalski CG. Neuropeptide-mediated excitability: a key triggering mechanism for seizure generation in the developing brain. Trends Neurosci. 1998;21:471–6. doi: 10.1016/s0166-2236(98)01275-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Wang W, Dow KE, Fraser DD. Elevated corticotropin releasing hormone/corticotropin releasing hormone-R1 expression in postmortem brain obtained from children with generalized epilepsy. Ann Neurol. 2001;50:404–9. doi: 10.1002/ana.1138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Camfield C, Camfield P, Smith B, Gordon K, Dooley J. Biologic factors as predictors of social outcome of epilepsy in intellectually normal children: a population-based study. J Pediatr. 1993;22:869–73. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(09)90009-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Gaitatzis A, Johnson AL, Chadwick DW, Shorvon SD, Sander JW. Life expectancy in people with newly diagnosed epilepsy. Brain. 2004;127:2427–32. doi: 10.1093/brain/awh267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Berg AT, Langfitt JT, Testa FM, Levy SR, DiMario F, Westerveld M, et al. Global cognitive function in children with epilepsy: a community-based study. Epilepsia. 2008;49:608–14. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2007.01461.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Cormack F, Cross JH, Isaacs E, Harkness W, Wright I, Vargha-Khadem F, et al. The development of intellectual abilities in pediatric temporal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2007;48:201–4. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2006.00904.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Holmes GL, Khazipov R, Ben-Ari Y. Seizure-induced damage in the developing human: relevance of experimental models. Prog Brain Res. 2002;135:321–34. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(02)35030-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Lynch M, Sayin U, Bownds J, Janumpalli S, Sutula T. Long-term consequences of early postnatal seizures on hippocampal learning and plasticity. Eur J Neurosci. 2000;12:2252–64. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9568.2000.00117.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Dubé CM, Zhou JL, Hamamura M, Zhao Q, Ring A, Abrahams J, et al. Cognitive dysfunction after experimental febrile seizures. Exp Neurol. 2009;215:167–77. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2008.10.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Gilles EE, Schultz L, Baram TZ. Abnormal corticosterone regulation in an immature rat model of continuous chronic stress. Pediatr Neurol. 1996;15:114–9. doi: 10.1016/0887-8994(96)00153-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Avishai-Eliner S, Gilles EE, Eghbal-Ahmadi Y, Bar-El Y, Baram TZ. Altered regulation of gene and protein expression of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis components in an immature rat model of chronic stress. J Neuroendocrinol. 2001;13:799–807. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2826.2001.00698.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Ivy AS, Brunson KL, Sandman C, Baram TZ. Dysfunctional nurturing behavior in rat dams with limited access to nesting material: a clinically relevant model for early-life stress. Neuroscience. 2008;154:1132–42. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.04.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Molet J, Maras PM, Avishai-Eliner S, Baram TZ. Naturalistic rodent models of chronic early-life stress. Dev Psychobiol. 2014;56:1675–88. doi: 10.1002/dev.21230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Baram TZ, Davis EP, Obenaus A, Sandman CA, Small SL, Solodkin A, et al. Fragmentation and unpredictability of early-life experience in mental disorders. Am J Psychiatry. 2012;169:907–15. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2012.11091347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Paxinos G, Watson C. The rat brain in stereotaxic coordinates. 4. SanDiego: Academic Press; 1998. [Google Scholar]
- 46.Dubé CM, Ravizza T, Hamamura M, Zha Q, Keebaugh A, Fok K, et al. Epileptogenesis provoked by prolonged experimental febrile seizures: mechanisms and biomarkers. J Neurosci. 2010;30:7484–94. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0551-10.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Choy M, Dubé CM, Patterson K, Barnes SR, Maras P, Blood AB, et al. A novel, noninvasive, predictive epilepsy biomarker with clinical potential. J Neurosci. 2014;34:8672–84. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4806-13.2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Nairismägi J, Gröhn OH, Kettunen MI, Nissinen J, Kauppinen RA, Pitkänen A. Progression of brain damage after status epilepticus and its association with epileptogenesis: a quantitative MRI study in a rat model of temporal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2004;45:1024–34. doi: 10.1111/j.0013-9580.2004.08904.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Dubé CM, Richichi C, Bender RA, Chung G, Litt B, Baram TZ. Temporal lobe epilepsy after experimental prolonged febrile seizures: prospective analysis. Brain. 2006;129:911–922. doi: 10.1093/brain/awl018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Chen Y, Bender RA, Frotscher M, Baram TZ. Novel and transient populations of corticotropin-releasing hormone-expressing neurons in developing hippocampus suggest unique functional roles: a quantitative spatiotemporal analysis. J Neurosci. 2001;21:7171–81. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-18-07171.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Avishai-Eliner S, Brunson KL, Sandman CA, Baram TZ. Stressed-out, or in (utero)? Trends Neurosci. 2002;25:518–24. doi: 10.1016/s0166-2236(02)02241-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Racine RJ. Modification of seizure activity by electrical stimulation. II. Motor seizure. Electroencephalogr Neurophysiol Clin. 1972;32:281–294. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(72)90177-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Baram TZ, Mitchell WG, Snead OC, 3rd, Horton EJ, Saito M. Brain-adrenal axis hormones are altered in the CSF of infants with massive infantile spasms. Neurology. 1992;42:1171–5. doi: 10.1212/wnl.42.6.1171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Kumar G, Jones NC, Morris MJ, Rees S, O’Brien TJ, Salzberg MR. Early life stress enhancement of limbic epileptogenesis in adult rats: mechanistic insights. PLoS One. 2011;6:e24033. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0024033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Ben-Ari Y, Tremblay E, Berger M, Nitecka L. Kainic acid seizure syndrome and binding sites in developing rats. Brain Res. 1984;316:284–8. doi: 10.1016/0165-3806(84)90314-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Baram TZ, Hirsch E, Snead OC, 3rd, Schultz L. Corticotropin-releasing hormone-induced seizures in infant rats originate in the amygdala. Ann Neurol. 1992;31:488–94. doi: 10.1002/ana.410310505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Baram TZ, Gerth A, Schultz L. Febrile seizures: an appropriate-aged model suitable for long-term studies. Brain Res Dev Brain Res. 1997;98:265–70. doi: 10.1016/s0165-3806(96)00190-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Aldenhoff JB, Gruol DL, Rivier J, Vale W, Siggins GR. Corticotropin releasing factor decreases postburst hyperpolarizations and excites hippocampal neurons. Science. 1983;221:875–7. doi: 10.1126/science.6603658. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Hollrigel GS, Chen K, Baram TZ, Soltesz I. The pro-convulsant actions of corticotropin-releasing hormone in the hippocampus of infant rats. Neuroscience. 1998;84:71–9. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4522(97)00499-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Hatalski CG, Baram TZ. Stress-induced transcriptional regulation in the developing rat brain involves increased cyclic adenosine 3′,5′-monophosphate-regulatory element binding activity. Mol Endocrinol. 1997;11:2016–24. doi: 10.1210/mend.11.13.0042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Ivy AS, Rex CS, Chen Y, Dubé C, Maras PM, Grigoriadis DE, et al. Hippocampal dysfunction and cognitive impairments provoked by chronic early-life stress involve excessive activation of CRH receptors. J Neurosci. 2010;30:13005–15. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1784-10.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Heaney DC, MacDonald BK, Everitt A, Stevenson S, Leonardi GS, Wilkinson P, et al. Socioeconomic variation in incidence of epilepsy: prospective community based study in south east England. BMJ. 2002;325:1013–6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7371.1013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Hesdorffer DC, Tian H, Anand K, Hauser WA, Ludvigsson P, Olafsson E, et al. Socioeconomic status is a risk factor for epilepsy in Icelandic adults but not in children. Epilepsia. 2005;46:1297–303. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2005.10705.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Staley KJ, White A, Dudek FE. Interictal spikes: harbingers or causes of epilepsy? Neurosci Lett. 2011;497:247–50. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2011.03.070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Chen Y, Fenoglio KA, Dubé CM, Grigoriadis DE, Baram TZ. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of hippocampal activation by acute stress are age-dependent. Mol Psychiatry. 2006;11:992–1002. doi: 10.1038/sj.mp.4001863. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Molet J, Maras PM, Ivy AS, Baram TZ. Mechanisms of enduring cognitive/memory vulnerability provoked by chronic early-life stress. Society for Neuroscience conference abstract; 2013. [Google Scholar]
- 67.Brunson KL, Kramár E, Lin B, Chen Y, Colgin LL, Yanagihara TK, et al. Mechanisms of late-onset cognitive decline after early-life stress. J Neurosci. 2005;25:9328–38. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2281-05.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Mares P, Velísek L. N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA)-induced seizures in developing rats. Brain Res Dev Brain Res. 1992;65:185–9. doi: 10.1016/0165-3806(92)90178-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Scantlebury MH, Galanopoulou AS, Chudomelova L, Raffo E, Betancourth D, Moshé SL. A model of symptomatic infantile spasms syndrome. Neurobiol Dis. 2010;37:604–12. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2009.11.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Price MG, Yoo JW, Burgess DL, Deng F, Hrachovy RA, Frost JD, Jr, et al. A triplet repeat expansion genetic mouse model of infantile spasms syndrome, Arx(GCG)10+7, with interneuronopathy, spasms in infancy, persistent seizures, and adult cognitive and behavioral impairment. J Neurosci. 2009;29:8752–63. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0915-09.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Marsh E, Fulp C, Gomez E, Nasrallah I, Minarcik J, Sudi J, et al. Targeted loss of Arx results in a developmental epilepsy mouse model and recapitulates the human phenotype in heterozygous females. Brain. 2009;132:1563–76. doi: 10.1093/brain/awp107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Holmes GL, Ben-Ari Y. Seizures in the developing brain: perhaps not so benign after all. Neuron. 1998;21:1231–4. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80642-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Dulac O, Milh M, Holmes GL. Brain maturation and epilepsy. Handb Clin Neurol. 2013;111:441–6. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-52891-9.00047-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Baram TZ. The brain, seizures and epilepsy throughout life: understanding a moving target. Epilepsy Curr. 2012;12:7–12. doi: 10.5698/1535-7511-12.4s.7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Nordli DR., Jr Infantile seizures and epilepsy syndromes. Epilepsia. 2002;43:11–6. doi: 10.1046/j.1528-1157.43.s.3.4.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Galvan C, Hrachovy RA, Smith KL, Swann JW. Blockade of neuronal activity during hippocampal development produces a chronic focal epilepsy in the rat. J Neurosci. 2000;20:2904–2916. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-08-02904.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Lee CL, Frost JD, Swann JW, Hrachovy RA. A new animal model of infantile spasms with unprovoked persistent seizures. Epilepsia. 2008;49:298–307. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2007.01377.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Cortez MA, Shen L, Wu Y, Aleem IS, Trepanier CH, Sadeghnia HR, et al. Infantile spasms and Down syndrome: a new animal model. Pediatr Res. 2009;65:499–503. doi: 10.1203/PDR.0b013e31819d9076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Stafstrom CE, Holmes GL. Infantile spasms: criteria for an animal model. Int Rev Neurobiol. 2002;49:391–411. doi: 10.1016/s0074-7742(02)49023-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Joëls M, Baram TZ. The neuro-symphony of stress. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009;10:459–466. doi: 10.1038/nrn2632. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Roozendaal B, Brunson KL, Holloway BL, McGaugh JL, Baram TZ. Involvement of stress-released corticotropin-releasing hormone in the basolateral amygdala in regulating memory consolidation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:13908–13913. doi: 10.1073/pnas.212504599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Snead OC., 3rd How does ACTH work against infantile spasms? Bedside to bench Ann Neurol. 2001;49:288–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Tekgul H, Polat M, Tosun A, Serdaroglu G, Kutukculer N, Gokben S. Cerebrospinal fluid interleukin-6 levels in patients with West syndrome. Brain Dev. 2006;28:19–23. doi: 10.1016/j.braindev.2005.03.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Dedeurwaerdere S, Friedman A, Fabene PF, Mazarati A, Murashima YL, Vezzani A, Baram TZ. Finding a better drug for epilepsy: antiinflammatory targets. Epilepsia. 2012;53:1113–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2012.03520.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]