Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Mol Psychiatry. 2015 Jun 9;20(9):1028–1029. doi: 10.1038/mp.2015.76

The 3q29 deletion confers greater than 40-fold increase in risk for schizophrenia

Jennifer Gladys Mulle 1,2
PMCID: PMC4546529  NIHMSID: NIHMS681589  PMID: 26055425

The 1.4 Mb deletion on chromosome 3q29 was first described in 2005 and is associated with a range of neurodevelopmental phenotypes, including developmental delay, intellectual disability (ID), and autism1. Prior data has implicated this same deletion as a suggestive or significant risk factor for schizophrenia (SZ)2-4, but the low frequency of the deletion has rendered individual samples underpowered to confirm this association, and prohibited an accurate estimate of risk. However, since the initial reports many more SZ samples with copy number variation (CNV) data have been published, and in aggregate is possible to arrive at a more accurate estimate of SZ risk for this genetic lesion. Toward this goal, a meta-analysis was conducted according to MOOSE guidelines5: a search of PubMed on 11/19/2014 for the keywords “schizophrenia CNV” resulted in 195 studies. A second search for “rare chromosomal schizophrenia” revealed 154 studies largely but not completely overlapping the initial set. Only case-control studies were considered. Criteria for inclusion into this meta-analysis included: sampling of cases and controls in the primary study (case-only studies and case reports were excluded); interrogation of the 3q29 genomic interval in cases and controls (by genome-wide methods, region-specific probes, or other assays directly targeting the region); and reporting of all rare CNV found in both cases and controls (in the primary paper or a supplement). Reasons studies were commonly excluded were: the study was a case report; the study was about a psychiatric disorder other than schizophrenia; or the paper was a review and did not contain primary data. Frequently, multiple papers were published on a progressively larger sample, where data from earlier papers are contained in later papers with additional study subjects included (for example, Rees 20146 and Rees 20147; Szatkiewicz 20138 and Szatkiewicz 20144; Mulle 20102 and Mulle 20149.) In these instances, to avoid “double-counting” of the data and inflating the risk estimate, we included for analysis purposes the paper with the largest and most complete data collection (in these three cases, the most recent paper). Sixteen studies, contributing seventeen distinct samples, fit all inclusion criteria. 3,4,6,9-21. From the final list of these qualifying papers, data for the 3q29 region were extracted (Table 1), representing 25,314 SZ cases and 62,432 controls. Overlapping data were identified in one instance: 590 cases (including 1 deletion carrier) and 439 controls were reported in4 and 20; data were subtracted from the totals reported in the more recent publication. In most papers, controls were ethnically matched to cases (Table 1, “EM”). Three papers used population-based, unscreened controls14,15,17; another used publicly available data as a comparison sample6, and the remainder used controls that were screened in some way for psychiatric illness. Determination of cases status was highly heterogeneous among studies; most studies used one or more standardized instruments along with case notes, medical records, history of hospitalizations, and/or informant interviews to arrive at a diagnosis. A single study used childhood onset cases13 (“COS” in Table 1) and a second study used SZ cases with ID.11 For two studies, clinical trial participants were included.6,10 The size of the reported variant was consistent among studies, with most reports indicating a 1.3 to 1.6 Mb deletion which removes all 24 genes in the interval. One report indicated a slightly smaller 837 kb deletion (though all but 1 gene in the typical deletion interval was removed)9 and two reports could not resolve the size because individual probes15 or limited markers17 were used for detection. For this meta-analysis, an overall (raw) odds ratio and a Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) adjusted odds ratio were calculated. The results of this analysis indicate that the 3q29 deletion confers a 41.1-fold increased risk for schizophrenia (p-value 5.8 × 10−8, 95% CI 5.6 – 1953.6). To assess whether any one sample was exerting undue influence on the risk estimate, each sample was removed and the CMH-adjusted odds ratio was recalculated. The range of OR estimates (33.3 – 41.1) suggests that larger samples may be exerting upward influence on the estimate of risk, but no one sample is driving the observed effect size. Typical estimates for effect sizes of other SZ-associated CNV range from 5-3022; thus, the 3q29 deletion may be the single largest risk factor for schizophrenia, surpassing even the 22q11.2 deletion. The 24 genes in the 3q29 deletion interval deserve scrutiny as molecular targets which, when haploinsufficient, may underlie at least one form of schizophrenia. Several candidate genes have been implicated in the region, including DLG1, PAK2 and FBXO45. This meta-analysis highlights the utility of large samples to identify rare genetic variants with high risk for severe psychiatric disease.

Table 1.

Ref. Ethnicity Selection of Controls SZ
cases
Case
3q29 del
Controls Control
3q29 del
CMH OR (95% CI, p-value)
with this sample removed
2 European American EM 2,667 4 2,648 0 36.4 (4.7 -1799.3, 8.4e-07)
2 African American EM 1,273 1 963 0 40.2 (5.4 – 1924.3, 1.0e-07)
3 Swedish EM 4,129 5 5,478 0 33.4 (4.2 – 1695.3, 3.4e-06)
5 Mixed (95%
European ancestry)
EM 6,882 4 11,255 0 33.3 (4.2 – 1691.5, 2.6e-06)
8 Ashkenazi Jewish EM 554 1 1,014 0 39.0 (5.2 – 1882.6, 1.6e-07)
9 Mixed (78%
Caucasian)
EM 150 1 256 0 39.1 (5.3 – 1887.4, 1.5e-07)
10 No information
(recruited from Iowa)
No information
(recruited from Iowa)
166 0 52 0 41.1 (5.6 – 1953.6, 5.8e-08)
11 Scottish (ID with SZ) Scottish (ID w/o SZ) 64 0 66 0 41.1 (5.6 – 1953.6, 5.8e-08)
12 COS: “highly
heterogeneous”
Unaffected sibs of
cases
126 0 69 0 41.1 (5.6 – 1953.6, 5.8e-08)
13 German EM 1,637 0 1,627 0 41.1 (5.6 – 1953.6, 5.8e-08)
14 Belgian, Swedish,
Scottish
EM 1,259 2 1,173 0 38.9 (5.2 – 1881.2, 2.1e-07)
15 Dutch EM 834 1 672 0 40.1 (5.4 – 1922.3, 1.0e-07)
16 Northern
European/European
EM 1,438 0 33,246 1 ∞ (6.7 - ∞, 2.7e-08)
17 Italian EM 172 1 160 0 40.0 (5.4 – 1917.5, 1.1e-07)
18 Afrikaner SZ trios (de
novo CNV)
Afrikaner control trios
(de novo CNV)
152 0 156 0 41.1 (5.6 – 1953.6, 5.8e-08)
19 Mixed European EM 3,391 2 3,181 0 38.9 (5.2 – 1880.7, 2.1e-07)
20 European ancestry EM 420 0 416 0 41.1 (5.6 – 1953.6, 5.8e-08)
Total 25,314 22 62,432 1
Raw OR 54.3 (95% CI: 8.8 – 2215.7, p-value 2.2e-11)
MHC OR 41.1 (95% CI: 5.6 – 1953.6 p-value 5.8e-08)

Acknowledgments

Conflict of interest statement: This work was funded by NIH grants MH100917 and GM097331.

References

  • 1.Cox DM, Butler MG. A clinical case report and literature review of the 3q29 microdeletion syndrome. Clinical dysmorphology. 2015 doi: 10.1097/MCD.0000000000000077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Mulle JG, Dodd AF, McGrath JA, et al. Microdeletions of 3q29 confer high risk for schizophrenia. American journal of human genetics. 2010;87:229–36. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2010.07.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Levinson DF, Duan J, Oh S, et al. Copy number variants in schizophrenia: confirmation of five previous findings and new evidence for 3q29 microdeletions and VIPR2 duplications. The American journal of psychiatry. 2011;168:302–16. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2010.10060876. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Szatkiewicz JP, O’Dushlaine C, Chen G, et al. Copy number variation in schizophrenia in Sweden. Molecular psychiatry. 2014;19:762–73. doi: 10.1038/mp.2014.40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, et al. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Jama. 2000;283:2008–12. doi: 10.1001/jama.283.15.2008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Rees E, Walters JT, Chambert KD, et al. CNV analysis in a large schizophrenia sample implicates deletions at 16p12.1 and SLC1A1 and duplications at 1p36.33 and CGNL1. Human molecular genetics. 2014;23:1669–76. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddt540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Rees E, Walters JT, Georgieva L, et al. Analysis of copy number variations at 15 schizophrenia-associated loci. The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science. 2014;204:108–14. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.113.131052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Szatkiewicz JP, Neale BM, O’Dushlaine C, et al. Detecting large copy number variants using exome genotyping arrays in a large Swedish schizophrenia sample. Molecular psychiatry. 2013;18:1178–84. doi: 10.1038/mp.2013.98. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Mulle JG, Pulver AE, McGrath JA, et al. Reciprocal duplication of the Williams-Beuren syndrome deletion on chromosome 7q11.23 is associated with schizophrenia. Biological psychiatry. 2014;75:371–7. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2013.05.040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Walsh T, McClellan JM, McCarthy SE, et al. Rare structural variants disrupt multiple genes in neurodevelopmental pathways in schizophrenia. Science. 2008;320:539–43. doi: 10.1126/science.1155174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Rudd DS, Axelsen M, Epping EA, Andreasen NC, Wassink TH. A genome-wide CNV analysis of schizophrenia reveals a potential role for a multiple-hit model. American journal of medical genetics Part B, Neuropsychiatric genetics : the official publication of the International Society of Psychiatric Genetics. 2014;165B:619–26. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.b.32266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Derks EM, Ayub M, Chambert K, et al. A genome wide survey supports the involvement of large copy number variants in schizophrenia with and without intellectual disability. American journal of medical genetics Part B, Neuropsychiatric genetics : the official publication of the International Society of Psychiatric Genetics. 2013;162B:847–54. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.b.32189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ahn K, Gotay N, Andersen TM, et al. High rate of disease-related copy number variations in childhood onset schizophrenia. Molecular psychiatry. 2014;19:568–72. doi: 10.1038/mp.2013.59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Priebe L, Degenhardt F, Strohmaier J, et al. Copy number variants in German patients with schizophrenia. PloS one. 2013;8:e64035. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0064035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Van Den Bossche MJ, Johnstone M, Strazisar M, et al. Rare copy number variants in neuropsychiatric disorders: Specific phenotype or not? American journal of medical genetics Part B, Neuropsychiatric genetics : the official publication of the International Society of Psychiatric Genetics. 2012;159B:812–22. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.b.32088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Buizer-Voskamp JE, Muntjewerff JW, Strengman E, et al. Genome-wide analysis shows increased frequency of copy number variation deletions in Dutch schizophrenia patients. Biological psychiatry. 2011;70:655–62. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2011.02.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Stefansson H, Rujescu D, Cichon S, et al. Large recurrent microdeletions associated with schizophrenia. Nature. 2008;455:232–6. doi: 10.1038/nature07229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Magri C, Sacchetti E, Traversa M, et al. New copy number variations in schizophrenia. PloS one. 2010;5:e13422. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Xu B, Roos JL, Levy S, van Rensburg EJ, Gogos JA, Karayiorgou M. Strong association of de novo copy number mutations with sporadic schizophrenia. Nature genetics. 2008;40:880–5. doi: 10.1038/ng.162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Rare chromosomal deletions and duplications increase risk of schizophrenia. Nature. 2008;455:237–41. doi: 10.1038/nature07239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Costain G, Lionel AC, Merico D, et al. Pathogenic rare copy number variants in community-based schizophrenia suggest a potential role for clinical microarrays. Human molecular genetics. 2013;22:4485–501. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddt297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Mulle JG. Schizophrenia genetics: progress, at last. Current opinion in genetics & development. 2012;22:238–44. doi: 10.1016/j.gde.2012.02.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES