Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Schizophrenia is well known to be associated with hippocampal structural abnormalities. We used 1H-MRS imaging to test the hypothesis that these abnormalities are accompanied by NAA deficits, reflecting neuronal dysfunction, in patients compared with healthy controls.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Nineteen patients with schizophrenia (11 male, 40.6±10.1 years old, 19.5±10.5 years disease duration) and 11 matched healthy controls (5 male, 33.7±10.1 years old) underwent MRI and multi-voxel point resolved spectroscopy (TE/TR=35/1400 ms) 1H-MRS imaging at 3 T to obtain their hippocampal GM absolute NAA, Cr, Cho and mIns concentrations. Unequal variance t-tests and ANCOVA were used to compare patients with controls. Bilateral volumes from manually outlined hippocampal masks were compared using unequal variance t-test.
RESULTS
Patients’ average hippocampal GM Cr concentration was 19% higher than controls’, 8.7±2.2 versus 7.4±1.2 mM (p<0.05); with no differences in NAA: 8.8±1.6 vs. 8.7±1.2 mM, Cho: 2.3±0.7 vs. 2.1±0.3 mM, or mIns: 6.1±1.5 vs. 5.2±0.9 (all p>0.1). There was a positive correlation between mIns and Cr in patients (r=0.57, p=0.05) but not controls. Bilateral hippocampal volume was ~10% lower in patients: 7.5±0.9 vs. 8.4±0.7 cm3 (p<0.05).
CONCLUSION
These findings suggest that the hippocampal volume deficit in schizophrenia is not due to net loss of neurons, in agreement with histopathology studies but not with prior 1H-MRS reports. Elevated Cr is consistent with hippocampal hypermetabolism and its correlation with mIns may also suggest an inflammatory process affecting some cases; this may suggest treatment targets and markers to monitor them.
INTRODUCTION
Schizophrenia (SZ) is a chronic psychiatric disorder that profoundly alters a person's perception, cognition, and behavior. Due to its high prevalence, ~1%, early onset and the limited efficacy of existing treatments, SZ exacts enormous personal and economic toll (1). The characteristic “positive” symptoms of SZ psychosis (delusions, hallucinations, disorganized speech and behavior) are accompanied by cognitive decline and “negative” symptoms including diminished emotional expression and avolition (2). Despite recognition as fundamental to the disorder as early as 1919, cognitive and negative symptoms were largely ignored once relatively effective pharmacological treatments for the positive symptoms emerged in the 1950s (3). In recent years, development of sophisticated investigative techniques has rekindled interest in the neurobiological substrate underlying SZ such that therapy may be developed to target the full range of symptoms and alter the clinical course.
This surge of effort has resulted in the development of a plurality of sometimes competing, sometimes overlapping theories of SZ pathophysiology, from the classic neurotransmitter-based theories to genetic, immune, synapse, and network-based theories. The hippocampus is implicated in many of these. SZ is known to be associated with reduced hippocampal volume, increased basal perfusion, decreased activation during certain memory tasks, decreased neurogenesis in its dentate gyrus and reduced connectivity with cortical and subcortical regions (4–9). Recent findings show that conversion to psychosis in high-risk subjects is predicted by hypermetabolism in the hippocampal CA1 subregion (4). Psychosis may be conceptualized as a disruption in learning and memory involving impaired habituation and “runaway” pattern completion due to hippocampal hyperactivity (4, 10, 11). The mechanism underlying these hippocampal abnormalities remain unclear. The absence of gliosis on post-mortem histopathology and reduced volume in prodromal and first-episode cases has fomented a shift from neuro-degenerative to neuro-developmental hypotheses (12). Lack of classic neurodegeneration with gliosis, however, does not imply absence of subtler progressive damage and inflammation. Mounting genetic and epidemiological data suggests a role for aberrant immune function and inflammation in SZ (13).
1H-MRS measures metabolites used as markers for underlying physiologic processes. Most prominently: NAA (NAA and N-acetylaspartylglutamate) for neuronal integrity, Cr (creatine and phosphocreatine) for energy metabolism, Cho (phosphocholine, choline and glycerophosphocholine) for membrane turnover and mIns (myo-inositol) for astroglial proliferation. (14). Most previous hippocampal 1H-MRS studies in SZ report lower NAA (15); one found increased Cr and Cho (15). None of ten others that measured Cho, seven Cr, or eight mIns, found changes (16). Difficulty interpreting results may stem from diagnostic heterogeneity within and between studies, insufficiently powered samples and methodological variation (16).
This study compares absolute hippocampal GM NAA, Cr, Cho and mIns levels, obtained with three-dimensional (3D) multivoxel 1H-MRS (1H-MRSI) at 3 T, between SZ patients and controls in order to test the hypothesis that the former have decreased hippocampal GM NAA reflecting neuronal damage. Higher field strength and 1H-MRSI (compared with single-voxel) yield better coverage of the hippocampus’s irregular shape, better SNR and spatial resolution.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
I. Human Subjects
The SZ or schizoaffective disorder cases were recruited from the outpatient clinics of NYU Langone Medical Center and Bellevue Hospital, diagnosed based on the Diagnostic Interview for Genetic Studies conducted by clinicians trained to reliability, and had ongoing assessments (17). All were taking stable doses of medications and had no other psychiatric or neurological disorders. Age-matched controls recruited from hospital postings met the criteria of no personal or family history of psychosis, no Axis I disorder in the last two years, and no known neurological disorder. Exclusion criteria for both cases and controls included uncontrolled medical illness, MRI contraindication or inability to tolerate MR exam and substance (except tobacco) use in the past six months. Substance use history of the cases, is: 6/19 reported current or past tobacco use, 6/19 past cannabis, 9/19 past cocaine, and 7/19 reported past alcohol use. All participants demographics are compiled in Table 1 and all gave Institutional Review Board approved written consent.
Table 1.
Subject | Status | Agea/Gender | Disease durationa |
Psychotropic Medication |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | C | 45/M | - | - |
2 | C | 31/M | - | - |
3 | C | 29/F | - | - |
4 | C | 36/M | - | - |
5 | C | 43/M | - | - |
6 | C | 24/F | - | - |
7 | C | 55/F | - | - |
8 | C | 26/F | - | - |
9 | C | 29/F | - | - |
10 | C | 22/M | - | - |
11 | C | 31/F | - | - |
12 | P | 41/M | 22 | Fluphenazine |
13 | P | 44/F | 27 | Quetiapine |
14 | P | 43/M | 18 | Haloperidol, quetiapine |
15 | P | 52/M | 32 | Citalopram |
16 | P | 51/F | 15 | Gabapentin, lithium, ziprasidone |
17 | P | 23/M | 3 | Risperidone |
18 | P | 47/M | 31 | Fluoxetine, risperidone, valproic acid, trazodone |
19 | P | 44/M | 26 | Clozapine, valproic acid |
20 | P | 26/M | 8 | Ziprasidone |
21 | P | 29/F | 8 | Buproprion, aripiprazole, fluphenazine |
22 | P | 42/F | 23 | Ziprasidone, buproprion, eszopiclone |
23 | P | 22/M | 4 | Clozapine |
24 | P | 48/M | 23 | Quetiapine |
25 | P | 34/M | 5 | Risperidone |
26 | P | 30/F | 10 | Risperidone |
27 | P | 49/F | 31 | Aripiprazole |
28 | P | 51/F | 35 | NA |
29 | P | 43/F | 20 | Aripiprazole, escitalopram, fluphenazine |
30 | P | 52/M | 30 | Aripiprazole, valproic acid, hydroxyzine, paroxetine, trazodone |
Years, “-“=not applicable.
II. MR Data Acquisition
All experiments were done at 3 T in a whole body MRI scanner (Trio, Siemens AG, Erlangen Germany) using a transmit-receive head-coil (TEM3000, MR Instruments, Minneapolis, MN). For anatomic reference, tissue segmentation and 1H-MRSI VOI guidance, T1-weighted, 3D MPRAGE images were obtained from each subject: TE/TI/TR=2.6/800/1360 ms, 256×256 matrix, 256×256 mm2 field-of-view (FOV), 160 slices, 1 mm thick each. These were reformatted into 192 axial, sagittal and coronal slices at 1 mm3 isotropic resolution.
Our non-iterative, B0 map based, Bolero (B0 loop encoded readout) software adjusted the scanner’s 1st and 2nd order shims to optimize the magnetic field homogeneity over the hippocampi in 3–5 minutes (18). A 6 cm anterior-posterior (AP) ×9 cm left-right (LR) ×2 cm inferior-superior (IS)=108 cm3 parallelepiped 1H-MRSI VOI was then image guided over the bilateral hippocampus, as shown in Fig. 1. This VOI was excited using point resolved spectroscopy (TE/TR= 35/1400 ms) with two 2nd-order Hadamard encoded slabs (4 slices) interleaved along the IS direction every TR, as shown in Fig. 1b, for optimal SNR and spatial coverage (19). Interleaving also enabled strong, 9 mT/m, Hadamard slice-selection gradients reducing the NAA → mIns chemical shift displacement to ~0.13 mm, ~3% of the slice thickness (20). Thin slices were also chosen to reduce broadening from susceptibility gradients in the IS direction from the air-tissue interface with the maxillary sinuses just below, as seen in Fig. 1a.
The four Hadamard slices’ planes were encoded with 16×16 2D-CSI over a 16×16 cm2 (LR×AP) FOV to form 1.0×1.0×0.5 cm3 voxels. [Note that the actual voxel size (=full width at half maximum of the point spread function) for such uniform 2D phase encoding is 1.12×1.12×0.5=0.63 cm3 (21, 22), since in the Hadamard direction the nominal equals the actual voxel size (23)]. The VOI was defined in their planes by two 11.2 ms numerically optimized 180° RF pulses (4.8 kHz bandwidth) under 1.8 and 1.2 mT/m in the AP and LR directions, to yield 9×6×4=216 voxels (see Fig. 1c). Such gradients lead the NAA VOI to experience a relative slice in-plane chemical shift displacement of 2.3 mm in the AP and 3.5 mm in the LR directions (24), i.e., of the 6×9×2 cm3 AP×LR×IS nominal VOI, at least 5.7×8.6×2 cm2 (93.4%) is common for all metabolites (25). Note (i) the Cho and Cr suffer even smaller relative displacements; (ii) the CSI localization grid does not experience this displacement (26); (iii) because it is a relative shift, this error is encountered only at the VOI edges (25).; and (iv) it is smaller than the 1×1 cm2 in-plane CSI resolution. Therefore, to avert it for all metabolites, we chose the in-plane VOI size large enough, 9×6 cm2, to have these displacement-error prone voxels at the VOI-edges completely outside the hippocampus, as shown in Fig. 1a and 2a. The MRS signals were acquired for 256 ms at ±1 kHz bandwidth. At two averages the 1H-MRS was ~25 minutes and the exam took under an hour.
III. MRS Post Processing
The MRS data were processed offline using in-house software. Residual water was removed from the MR signals in the time domain (27), the data static-field drift corrected (28), voxel-shifted to align the CSI grid with the NAA VOI, Fourier transformed in the temporal, AP and LR direction and Hadamard reconstructed along the IS. Spectra were automatically corrected for frequency and zero-order phase shifts in reference to the NAA peak in each voxel.
Relative levels of the ith (i=NAA, Cr, Cho, mIns) metabolite in the jth (j=1..216) voxel of the kth (k=1..30) subject were estimated from their peak area, Sijk, using parametric spectral modeling (29), with Glx, Cho, Cr, mI, NAA and taurine model functions, as shown in Fig. 1d. The Sijk were scaled into absolute concentration, Cijk, relative to a 2 L reference sphere of , 10.0, 3.0 and 7.5 mM NAA, Cr, Cho and mIns in water at physiological ionic strength:
[1] |
where SikR is the phantom’s metabolites’ signals; and subject and reference RF voltages for non-selective 1 ms 180° pulses and Fjk is that voxels tissue fraction, estimated from the WM, GM and CSF segmented MP-RAGE images, as described below. The fi corrects Cijk for in vivo ( assuming small patients-controls differences) and in vitro relaxation times differences (30):
[2] |
using the , 1.3, 1.1 and 1.2 s, , 172, 248 and 200 ms reported for NAA, Cr, Cho and mIns at 3 T (31–33); and , 336, 235 and 319 ms, , 288, 200 and 233 ms in the reference phantom.
Bilateral hippocampi masks were manually traced on the axial MP-RAGE images based on an MRI atlas (34), as shown in Fig. 1a, and visually verified on sagittal and coronal planes. The axial MRI were segmented into CSF, gray and white matter (GM, WM) masks using SPM12 [University College London, UK (35)], as shown in Fig. 2b–d. An in-house program (MATLAB 14, Mathworks, Framingham, MA) calculated the fraction of each tissue mask inside each voxel (36), from which Fjk = (GM volume+ WM volume)/ (voxel volume) for Eq. [1] was obtained. We retained only voxels with at least 30% their volume within the hippocampus mask. To minimize inclusion of degraded signals, only voxels that also had: (i) Fjk >70%, i.e., contained <30% CSF, (ii) Cramer-Rao lower bounds <20% for a given metabolite; and (iii) 4 Hz< linewidths <13 Hz, were retained, as shown in Fig. 2. The software then estimated the global GM and WM concentrations of each metabolite in the retained N ≥ 2 hippocampus voxels using linear regression, as described previously (36). This approach overcomes the GM/WM partial volume issue encountered by single-voxel MRS. Note that although metabolic gradients are reported along the long axis of the hippocampus (37, 38), since the entire structure is taken here as a whole; and these metabolites’ intra-subject gradients are reported to be quite similar, our average concentration reported here is nevertheless a useful inter-subject comparison metric.
IV. Statistical Analyses
Exact Mann-Whitney and unequal variance t-tests were used to compare the groups in terms of age and in terms of the volume measure and each metabolite concentration without adjustment for age and gender. ANOVA was used to compare the groups in terms of the volume and each metabolite concentration adjusted for age and gender. ANOVA for each measure allowed the error variance to differ across subject groups to avoid an assumption of variance equality. F and Levene tests were used to compare the groups in terms of the variance of the volume measure and each metabolite concentration. All tests were conducted at the 5% significance level.
RESULTS
A total of 19 cases and 11 controls were included in the analyses, as shown in Table 1. The groups were not different with respect to age (p=0.119). The Bolero shim procedure yielded metabolites linewidths of 8.1±3.0 Hz across all 216 VOI voxels for patients and controls, as shown in Fig. 1. The number of voxels that passed the selection criteria described above and were used to estimate metabolites' concentrations were 10.5±3.4 in patients and 14.5±5.4 in controls for NAA; 8.3±3.4 and 11.3±4.9 for Cho; 8.0±3.5 and 12.8±4.4 for Cr; 4.8±1.7 and 7.0±3.8 for mIns. Average hippocampal GM metabolite concentrations and the bilateral volumes, as shown in Fig. 1a, are given in Table 2. Note that since the analysis was done independently for each metabolite, different numbers of subjects are included for each, based on how many had at least two voxels that passed the exclusion criteria.
Table 2.
Metabolite | Controls | Patients | p-value |
---|---|---|---|
NAA | a8.7±1.2 (n=11) | a8.8±1.6 (n=16) | 0.876 |
Cr | a7.4±1.2 (n=10) | a8.7±2.2 (n=19) | 0.035 |
Cho | a2.1±0.3 (n=10) | a2.3±0.7 (n=18) | 0.189 |
mIns | a5.2±0.9 (n=10) | a6.1±1.5 (n=12) | 0.161 |
Volume (cm3) | 8.4±0.5 (n=11) | 7.5±0.9 (n=19) | 0.003 |
Means ± Standard deviation, number of subjects from whom the data was derived n (in parentheses), and p-values (from unequal variance T tests) of the absolute NAA, Cr, Cho and mIns hippocampal GM concentrations a(millimolar), as well as the volumes of the bilateral hippocampi in controls and patients (in cm3). Significant differences are in boldface; note elevation of Cr and reduction in volume in patients compared to controls.
Patients had 19% (p<0.05) higher hippocampal GM Cr level than controls, even after adjusting for age and gender, as shown in Table 2 and Fig. 3. NAA, Cho and mIns were not significantly different. The variance of the Cho levels was larger in patients than in controls (p=0.05); and trended that way in Cr (p=0.06). There was a positive correlation between mIns and Cr levels in patients (r=0.57, p=0.05) but not in controls (r=0.42, p=0.26). Other metabolites were not significantly correlated. Bilateral hippocampal volume was ~10% (p<0.05) lower in patients.
DISCUSSION
Surprisingly, our findings do not support the hypothesis that patients with SZ exhibit decreased hippocampal GM NAA (due to neuronal dysfunction) compared with healthy controls, as generally reported (16). They are, however, concordant with neuropathology studies that consistently find reduced hippocampal volume without net loss of neurons, but with neuronal architectural disarray and molecular alterations, e.g., changes in receptor density and deficits in the inhibitory interneurons that comprise 10% of hippocampal neurons (12).
Our finding of elevated hippocampal GM Cr in SZ may suggest either altered hippocampal energy metabolism or increased proportion of glial cells. The is because the Cr 1H-MRS peak is a composite of free creatine and phosphocreatine that interconvert to regenerate ATP, thus acting as a short-term energy “buffer” for the cell. Cr elevation may, therefore, reflect altered energy metabolism, likely hyper-metabolism as a more metabolically active cell reasonably requires greater capacity to regenerate ATP (decreased Cr has similarly been interpreted as hypo-metabolism) (10, 39). Indeed, increase in energy metabolism is consistent with the hippocampal hyperactivity model of SZ, supported by evidence from animal model, neuroimaging and histopathology studies (40). Nuclear imaging studies show increased basal perfusion (41) that correlates with psychotic symptoms and is normalized by D2 antagonists (42), while resting state fMRI shows hyperactivity correlated with cognitive deficits and negative symptoms (43). Hippocampal hyperactivity may be mediated by increased glutamatergic activity, which has been found in the hippocampus of unmedicated SZ patients and associated with reduced hippocampal volume and worse executive functioning and global clinical state (44). Furthermore, a reciprocal pathway between the hippocampus and dopaminergic neurons in the midbrain supports a link to the dopamine hypothesis of SZ (40).
Cho and mIns are elevated alongside Cr in astrogliosis, reflecting their higher levels in glial cells than neurons (14). Although we did not find significant elevations in hippocampal GM Cho or mIns, the correlation between Cr and mIns in cases (but not controls) suggests that in at least some cases elevation in Cr may reflect astrogliosis - a response to inflammation. Evidence supporting an immune or inflammatory component in SZ continues to accumulate. This includes the increased risk of SZ after exposure to certain maternal viruses in utero, the increased expression in the hippocampus of genes related to the immune response identified by mRNA sequencing, the significant associations with inflammatory-related genes identified in GWAS meta-analyses (including in the HLA complex, where a recent study suggests increased expression of a complement component gene may mediate excessive synaptic pruning), and the increase in proinflammatory cytokines including IL-6 and TNF-α in patients with psychosis (45, 46).
That histopathology studies do not show glial cell proliferation in SZ does not rule out the possibility that a subset of patients undergo astrogliosis (12). This notion is consistent with the emerging concept of the clinical syndrome of SZ as composed of a group of separate conditions differing in relevant pathophysiologies, termed “SZ and related psychoses”. Consistent with the idea of etiological heterogeneity, cases exhibited greater coefficients of variation than controls for both Cho (28% vs. 16%, p=0.05) and Cr (25% vs. 16%, p=0.06). A subset of cases may undergo an inflammatory process, causing elevated Cho, Cr, and mIns through astrogliosis or subtler inflammation that damages glial cells and/or myelin.
The reduced hippocampal volume seen in patients is consistent with prior reports. Along with the prefrontal cortex, the hippocampus is consistently observed to undergo volume loss in SZ (4). A recent collaborative analysis of brain volumes using imaging data from 2028 individuals with SZ and 2540 healthy controls found the largest patient control effect size for the hippocampus of any subcortical area, with a mean 4.10% volume decrease compared with controls (47). The lack of correlation between hippocampal volume and NAA level in our study suggests that the lower volume in patients is not due to neuronal loss from progression of a pathogenic process and may, therefore, be suggestive of a developmental trait.
There may be several reasons for the discordance between our findings and most previous studies. First, clinical heterogeneity (disease duration, symptomatology, medications) both between and within studied populations is known to affect 1H-MRS results (16). Second, methodology differences are well-known to affect results. Our 3D technique yields better spatial resolution (0.5 cm3 versus 3.5 cm3 or larger) and delineation of the irregular shape, with less inclusion of neighboring WM than single-voxels, even accounting for partial WM and CSF volume. Third, studies that found lower NAA in patients had on average longer TEs, making them more sensitive to quantification errors due to T2-weighting variations, than our short, TE=35 ms acquisition (48). Fourth, some studies use Cr as an “internal reference” and report its ratios with other metabolites. This approach magnifies errors and is further complicated by findings that Cr is altered in several brain regions in SZ (16). Finally, as others point out, there is a publication bias in favor of NAA deficit reports as opposed to a finding of “no change” (16).
Admittedly, our study also has several limitations. First, our sample comprised patients with varying disease durations, medication regimens, and history of substance use at insufficient numbers to distinguish the effect of these variables. Second, a relatively small sample size may have limited the power to detect small differences, e.g., Cho or mIns elevations in the patients. Third, even our improved spatial resolution is insufficient to resolve hippocampal subfields that may be differentially affected in SZ (4). Third, the regressions used to obtain metabolites’ concentrations relied on relatively few, 8 – 14 voxels per individual, as a balance was struck between the 3D 1H-MRSI spatial resolution, measurement time and hippocampus volume. While this may be improved at higher fields, at 3 T, this is likely nearly as good as can be achieved. Fourth, because of the anatomical milieu (deep in the brain, irregularly shaped, near air filled sinuses), it is difficult to obtain adequate SNR to quantify hippocampal glutamate and glutamine levels. Finally, our interpretation of elevated Cr is limited by the inability of 3 T 1H-MRS to distinguish the Cr from phosphocreatine resonances, and our proposals of altered energy metabolism and astrogliosis are here supported by inference and existing literature rather than direct measurement.
CONCLUSIONS
Decreased volume without GM NAA decline in the hippocampus of patients with SZ suggests a process that preserves neuronal integrity and could represent a developmental rather than pathological disruption. Increased hippocampal GM Cr suggests hypermetabolism and/or possibly astrogliosis in a subset of patients. These findings may have implications for both the pathogenesis and treatment of SZ by supporting the hippocampal hyperactivity model. In some patients an inflammatory process (possibly involving astrogliosis) may be a treatment target in addition to the anti-dopaminergic treatments. Indeed, there is growing recognition that the efficacy of antipsychotics may be mediated in part through anti-inflammatory action and there are ongoing efforts with promising results using anti-inflammatory agents including aspirin, COX-2 inhibitors and N-acetylcysteine as adjuvant therapies (49). Therefore, we propose 1H-MRSI both as a probe to identify patient subgroups and as a method to monitor therapies.
Acknowledgments
Funding
This work was supported by NIH grants: RC1MH088843, 2K24MH00169, MH108962, EB011639, EB01015, NS081772, NS090417, NS097494; and the Center for Advanced Imaging Innovation and Research (CAI2R, www.cai2r.net), a NIBIB Biomedical Technology Resource Center (NIH P41 EB017183) and CTSI UL1TR000038 (NYU). Assaf Tal acknowledges the support of the Monroy-Marks Career Development Fund, the Carolito Stiftung Fund, the Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust and the historic generosity of the Harold Perlman Family. This research was supported by a research grant from the Sylvia Schaefer Alzheimer's Research Fund.
Abbreviation Key
- SZ
schizophrenia
- 1H-MRSI
three dimensional multivoxel 1H-MRS
Footnotes
DISCLOSURES: Emma Meyer—RELATED: NIH.* Ivan Kirov—UNRELATED: Travel/Accommodations/Meeting Expenses Unrelated to Activities Listed: North American Brain Injury Society, Comments: For travel to their annual meeting with the purpose of giving a lecture on proton MR spectroscopy in traumatic brain injury. Mariana Lazar—RELATED: Grant: National Institute of Mental Health,* Comments: This work was funded in part by a grant from National Institute of Mental Health. Dolores Malaspina—RELATED: Grant: NIMH*; UNRELATED: Expert Testimony: Total in career of 10,000, Comments: As a psychiatrist, I consult on issues such as psychiatric diagnoses by mass shooters, possible mental illness in transportation agents; Grants/Grants Pending: NIMH.*
*money paid to institution
REFERENCES
- 1.Wu EQ, Birnbaum HG, Shi L, et al. The economic burden of schizophrenia in the United States in 2002. J Clin Psychiatry. 2005;66:1122–1129. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v66n0906. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders : DSM-5. Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric Association; 2013. American Psychiatric Association. DSM-5 Task Force. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Malaspina D, Walsh-Messinger J, Gaebel W, et al. Negative symptoms, past and present: a historical perspective and moving to DSM-5. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2014;24:710–724. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2013.10.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Tamminga CA, Stan AD, Wagner AD. The hippocampal formation in schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry. 2010;167:1178–1193. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2010.09081187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Adriano F, Caltagirone C, Spalletta G. Hippocampal volume reduction in first-episode and chronic schizophrenia: a review and meta-analysis. Neuroscientist. 2012;18:180–200. doi: 10.1177/1073858410395147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Steen RG, Mull C, McClure R, Hamer RM, Lieberman JA. Brain volume in first-episode schizophrenia: systematic review and meta-analysis of magnetic resonance imaging studies. Br J Psychiatry. 2006;188:510–518. doi: 10.1192/bjp.188.6.510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Iritani S. Neuropathology of schizophrenia: a mini review. Neuropathology. 2007;27:604–608. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1789.2007.00798.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Samudra N, Ivleva EI, Hubbard NA, et al. Alterations in hippocampal connectivity across the psychosis dimension. Psychiatry Res. 2015 doi: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2015.06.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kirov II, Hardy CJ, Matsuda K, et al. In vivo 7 Tesla imaging of the dentate granule cell layer in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2013;147:362–367. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2013.04.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Wood SJ, Berger G, Velakoulis D, et al. Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy in first episode psychosis and ultra high-risk individuals. Schizophr Bull. 2003;29:831–843. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.schbul.a007049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Schobel SA, Lewandowski NM, Corcoran C, et al. The CA1 subfield is a primary site of hippocampal dysfunction associated with Schizophrenia. Archives of General Psychiatry. 2009 doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2009.115. In Press. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Harrison PJ. The hippocampus in schizophrenia: a review of the neuropathological evidence and its pathophysiological implications. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2004;174:151–162. doi: 10.1007/s00213-003-1761-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Najjar S, Pearlman DM, Alper K, Najjar A, Devinsky O. Neuroinflammation and psychiatric illness. J Neuroinflammation. 2013;10:43. doi: 10.1186/1742-2094-10-43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Zhu H, Barker PB. MR spectroscopy and spectroscopic imaging of the brain. Methods Mol Biol. 2011;711:203–226. doi: 10.1007/978-1-61737-992-5_9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Lutkenhoff ES, van Erp TG, Thomas MA, et al. Proton MRS in twin pairs discordant for schizophrenia. Mol Psychiatry. 2010;15:308–318. doi: 10.1038/mp.2008.87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Schwerk A, Alves FD, Pouwels PJ, van Amelsvoort T. Metabolic alterations associated with schizophrenia: a critical evaluation of proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy studies. J Neurochem. 2014;128:1–87. doi: 10.1111/jnc.12398. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Nurnberger JI, Jr, Blehar MC, Kaufmann CA, et al. Diagnostic interview for genetic studies. Rationale, unique features, and training. NIMH Genetics Initiative. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1994;51:849–859. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1994.03950110009002. discussion 863-844. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Hetherington HP, Chu WJ, Gonen O, Pan JW. Robust fully automated shimming of the human brain for high-field (1)H spectroscopic imaging. Magn Reson Med. 2006;56:26–33. doi: 10.1002/mrm.20941. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Goelman G, Liu S, Hess D, Gonen O. Optimizing the efficiency of high-field multivoxel spectroscopic imaging by multiplexing in space and time. Magn Reson Med. 2006;56:34–40. doi: 10.1002/mrm.20942. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Goelman G, Liu S, Fleysher R, Fleysher L, Grossman RI, Gonen O. Chemical-shift artifact reduction in Hadamard-encoded MR spectroscopic imaging at high (3T and 7T) magnetic fields. Magn Reson Med. 2007;58:167–173. doi: 10.1002/mrm.21251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Mareci T, Brooker H. Essential considerations for spectral localization using indirect gradient encoding of spatial information. J Magn Reson. 1991;92:229–246. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Brooker HR, Mareci TH, Mao JT. Selective Fourier transform localization. Magn Reson Med. 1987;5:417–433. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910050503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Goelman G, Liu S, Gonen O. Reducing voxel bleed in Hadamard-encoded MRI and MRS. Magn Reson Med. 2006;55:1460–1465. doi: 10.1002/mrm.20903. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.de Graaf RA. in vivo NMR Spectroscopy. Chichester, England: John Weily & Sons; 2007. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Barker PB, Bizzi A, Stefano ND, Gullapalli RP, Lin DDM. Clinical MR Spectroscopy Techniques and Applications. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press; 2010. Spectral Analysis Methods, Quantitation and Common Artifacts; pp. 34–50. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Brown TR, Kincaid BM, Ugurbil K. NMR chemical shift imaging in three dimensions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1982;79:3523–3526. doi: 10.1073/pnas.79.11.3523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Marion D, Ikura M, Bax A. Improved solvent suppression in one- and two-dimensional NMR spectra by convolution of time domain data. J Magn Reson. 1989;84:425–430. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Tal A, Gonen O. Localization errors in MR spectroscopic imaging due to the drift of the main magnetic field and their correction. Magn Reson Med. 2013;70:895–904. doi: 10.1002/mrm.24536. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Soher BJ, Young K, Govindaraju V, Maudsley AA. Automated spectral analysis III: application to in vivo proton MR spectroscopy and spectroscopic imaging. Magn Reson Med. 1998;40:822–831. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910400607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Kirov I, George IC, Jayawickrama N, Babb JS, Perry NN, Gonen O. Longitudinal inter- and intra-individual human brain metabolic quantification over 3 years with proton MR spectroscopy at 3 T. Mag Reson Med. 2012;67:27–33. doi: 10.1002/mrm.23001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Traber F, Block W, Lamerichs R, Gieseke J, Schild HH. 1H metabolite relaxation times at 3.0 tesla: Measurements of T1 and T2 values in normal brain and determination of regional differences in transverse relaxation. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2004;19:537–545. doi: 10.1002/jmri.20053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Kirov I, Fleysher L, Fleysher R, Patil V, Liu S, Gonen O. Age dependence of regional proton metabolites T2 relaxation times in the human brain at 3 T. Magn Reson Med. 2008;60:790–795. doi: 10.1002/mrm.21715. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Posse S, Otazo R, Caprihan A, et al. Proton echo-planar spectroscopic imaging of J-coupled resonances in human brain at 3 and 4 Tesla. Mag Reson Med. 2007;58:236–244. doi: 10.1002/mrm.21287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Oishi K. MRI atlas of human white matter. Amsterdam: Elsevier/Academic Press; 2011. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Ashburner J, Friston KJ. Unified segmentation. Neuroimage. 2005;26:839–851. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.02.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Tal A, Kirov I, Grossman RI, Gonen O. The role of gray and white matter segmentation in quantitative proton MR spectroscopic imaging. NMR Biomed. 2012;25:1392–1400. doi: 10.1002/nbm.2812. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.King KG, Glodzik L, Liu S, Babb JS, de Leon MJ, Gonen O. Anteroposterior hippocampal metabolic heterogeneity: three-dimensional multivoxel proton 1H MR spectroscopic imaging--initial findings. Radiology. 2008;249:242–250. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2491071500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Vermathen P, Laxer KD, Matson GB, Weiner MW. Hippocampal structures: anteroposterior N-acetylaspartate differences in patients with epilepsy and control subjects as shown with proton MR spectroscopic imaging. Radiology. 2000;214:403–410. doi: 10.1148/radiology.214.2.r00fe43403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Mazgaj R, Tal A, Goetz R, et al. Hypo-metabolism of the rostral anterior cingulate cortex associated with working memory impairment in 18 cases of schizophrenia. Brain Imaging Behav. 2015 doi: 10.1007/s11682-015-9372-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Heckers S, Konradi C. GABAergic mechanisms of hippocampal hyperactivity in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2015;167:4–11. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2014.09.041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Malaspina D, Storer S, Furman V, et al. SPECT study of visual fixation in schizophrenia and comparison subjects. Biol Psychiatry. 1999;46:89–93. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3223(98)00306-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Lahti AC, Holcomb HH, Weiler MA, Medoff DR, Tamminga CA. Functional effects of antipsychotic drugs: comparing clozapine with haloperidol. Biol Psychiatry. 2003;53:601–608. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3223(02)01602-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Tregellas JR, Smucny J, Harris JG, et al. Intrinsic hippocampal activity as a biomarker for cognition and symptoms in schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry. 2014;171:549–556. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2013.13070981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Poels EM, Kegeles LS, Kantrowitz JT, et al. Glutamatergic abnormalities in schizophrenia: a review of proton MRS findings. Schizophr Res. 2014;152:325–332. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2013.12.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Sekar A, Bialas AR, de Rivera H, et al. Schizophrenia risk from complex variation of complement component 4. Nature. 2016;530:177–183. doi: 10.1038/nature16549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Hwang Y, Kim J, Shin JY, et al. Gene expression profiling by mRNA sequencing reveals increased expression of immune/inflammation-related genes in the hippocampus of individuals with schizophrenia. Translational psychiatry. 2013;3:e321. doi: 10.1038/tp.2013.94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.van Erp TG, Hibar DP, Rasmussen JM, et al. Subcortical brain volume abnormalities in 2028 individuals with schizophrenia and 2540 healthy controls via the ENIGMA consortium. Mol Psychiatry. 2015 doi: 10.1038/mp.2015.118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Bracken BK, Rouse ED, Renshaw PF, Olson DP. T2 relaxation effects on apparent N-acetylaspartate concentration in proton magnetic resonance studies of schizophrenia. Psychiatry Res. 2013;213:142–153. doi: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2013.03.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Sommer IE, van Westrhenen R, Begemann MJ, de Witte LD, Leucht S, Kahn RS. Efficacy of anti-inflammatory agents to improve symptoms in patients with schizophrenia: an update. Schizophr Bull. 2014;40:181–191. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbt139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]