Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jun 15.
Published in final edited form as: J Neurosci Methods. 2017 May 8;285:58–68. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2017.05.011

An optimized method for enumerating CNS derived memory B cells during viral-induced inflammation

Krista D DiSano 1,2, Stephen A Stohlman 1,ˆ, Cornelia C Bergmann 1,*
PMCID: PMC5545894  NIHMSID: NIHMS877324  PMID: 28495370

Abstract

Background

CNS inflammation resulting from infection, injury, or neurodegeneration leads to accumulation of diverse B cell subsets. Although antibody secreting cells (ASC) within the inflamed CNS have been extensively examined, memory B cell (Bmem) characterization has been limited as they do not secrete antibody without stimulation. Moreover, unlike human Bmem, reliable surface markers for murine Bmem remain elusive.

New method

Using a viral encephalomyelitis model we developed a modified limiting dilution in vitro stimulation assay to convert CNS-derived virus specific Bmem into ASC.

Comparison with existing methods

Stimulation methods established for lymphoid tissue cells using prolonged stimulation with viral lysate resulted in substantial ASC loss and minimal Bmem to ASC conversion of CNS-derived cells. By varying stimulation duration, TLR activators, and culture supplements, we achieved optimal conversion by culturing cells with TLR7/8 agonist R848 in the presence of feeder cells for 2 days.

Results

Flow cytometry markers CD38 and CD73 characterizing murine Bmem from lymphoid tissue showed more diverse expression patterns on corresponding CNS-derived B cell subsets. Using the optimized TLR7/8 stimulation protocol, we compared virus-specific IgG Bmem versus pre-existing ASC within the brain and spinal cord. Increasing Bmem frequencies during chronic infection mirrored kinetics of ASC. However, despite initially similar Bmem and ASC accumulation, Bmem prevailed in the brain, but were lower than ASC in the spinal cord during persistence.

Conclusion

Simultaneous enumeration of antigen-specific Bmem and ASC using the Bmem assay optimized for CNS-derived cells enables characterization of temporal changes during microbial or auto-antigen induced neuroinflammation.

Keywords: Memory B cells, Central nervous system, Virus infection, Antibody secreting cells

1. Introduction

Antibody (Ab) secreting cells (ASC) and serum Ab are essential immune components that neutralize pathogens during infection and mediate protective immunity following vaccination. However, serum immunoglobulin (Ig) is short-lived lasting several weeks and requires continuous production to maintain protective immunity for years or even life of the host (1, 2). The production of serum Ab is sustained not only by long-lived fully differentiated ASC, termed plasma cells which reside in the bone marrow, but also by memory B cells (Bmem) that can rapidly convert to ASC (2, 3). Bmem arise both during germinal center (GC) dependent (IgG+ Bmem) or independent responses (IgM+ Bmem) following initial antigen exposure and can persist independent of antigen within secondary lymphoid tissue (SLT) for years (3, 4). Although Bmem do not spontaneously secrete Ab, minimal stimulation requirements, including T cell help and/or secondary encounter of antigen can trigger rapid differentiation into antigen-specific ASC or re-seed GC, thereby promoting isotype switching and somatic hypermutation (3, 59). In addition to contributing to long-lived humoral immunity, Bmem function as potent antigen presenting cells and as immune modulators by secreting cytokines (1014). Although studies of B cells within the inflamed CNS have commonly focused on ASC and Ab specificity, B cell populations accumulating during CNS infection, injury, and neurodegeneration are diverse and include Bmem (11, 1522). However, the role of Bmem within the inflamed CNS is relatively unexplored due to limitations of reliable surface markers, particularly in murine models.

Human Bmem are classically distinguished by expression of CD27, a protein belonging to the tumor necrosis factor receptor (TNFR) family that provides signals regulating entry into plasma cell lineage (23, 24). More detailed human Bmem phenotyping revealed heterogeneous populations, including CD27 Bmem, and markers have expanded to include specific patterns of CD38, CD21, CD24, CD19, B220, FcRH4 and CD25 (2527). While this panel has aided in identifying several reliable markers of human Bmem, murine Bmem characterization is limited by the low frequency of Bmem and minimal expression of CD27 (2831). Although several markers including CD73, CD38, CD80 and PD-L2 have been proposed to define at least five subsets of Bmem, these markers are also expressed by several other B cell phenotypes within SLT (5, 29, 32, 33). Moreover, our own studies of murine B cell subsets in the central nervous system (CNS) have revealed unique patterns of activation markers compared to peripheral B cell counterparts, further complicating identification of CNS B cell subsets based on well-defined SLT markers (34). For example, CD80, a marker of CD4 T cell help and a proposed marker defining subpopulations of Bmem within SLT, was found on multiple B cell phenotypes within the CNS (34). Bmem analysis in vivo has largely relied on protein immunizations in B cell receptor (BCR) transgenic mice to increase Bmem frequencies, or on antigenic challenge in naïve recipients of adoptively transferred antigen-specific B cells. Both in vitro and in vivo Bmem to ASC conversion has been shown to require proliferation (3540). Quantitative assessment of Bmem frequency and antigen specificity thus include lengthy ELISA based limiting dilution assays (LDA) requiring 2–3 weeks of stimulation or shorter 3–6 day in vitro stimulation methods to convert Bmem into ASC, which are measured by conventional ELISPOT (3537, 4145). These methods to define Bmem antigen specificity and relative frequencies have focused on peripheral blood or SLT using TLR agonists to stimulate in vitro Bmem conversion to ASC. To the best of our knowledge these approaches have not been applied to CNS-derived Bmem which are exposed to a vastly distinct microenvironment. Prolonged isolation procedure of lymphocytes from the CNS as well as their prior in vivo exposure to toxic factors may require fine-tuning methods to define Bmem kinetics and specificity during CNS infection, injury, and neurodegeneration.

In the present study, we analyzed Bmem marker expression on CNS infiltrating B cells and optimized in vitro stimulation methods to enumerate virus-specific Bmem in the CNS using neurotropic coronavirus JMHV-induced encephalomyelitis. In this model, virus introduced into the brain spreads to spinal cords (46). Although T cells clear infectious virus from both organs within 14–16 days post infection (p.i.), virus establishes persistence characterized by low levels of persisting viral RNA and elevated levels of chemokines and cytokines predominantly in spinal cords (20). ASC emerging within the CNS after initial viral control maintain persisting viral RNA at low levels and prevent viral recrudescence (47, 48). Isotype-unswitched IgG B cells accumulating early during infection are progressively replaced by more differentiated IgDIgM isotype-switched Bmem and ASC (20). ASC are recruited directly to brain and spinal cord in a CXCR3/CXCL10 dependent manner (48). Although the initial percentage of ASC within total B cells is similar in brain and spinal cords, ASC accumulate faster and to a higher percentage in spinal cord during viral persistence (20). While IgG+ Bmem emerge in the brain (20), their relative recruitment to spinal cords, specificity and potential local conversion to ASC remains unknown. Distinct CD38 and CD73 expression patterns among CNS infiltrating B cells relative to SLT counterparts limited Bmem identification by flow cytometry. Furthermore, in vitro Bmem stimulation protocols optimized for splenocytes failed to convert CNS Bmem, suggesting CNS-derived Bmem succumb to cell death. This was supported by reduced pre-existing ASC using similar culture conditions compared to direct ex vivo ELISPOT ASC. Comparison of TLR7/8 and TLR9 agonists as Bmem activators, supplementation with feeders and IL-2, as well as reduced culture length revealed optimal CNS-derived Bmem conversion is achieved by 2 day stimulation with the TLR7/8 agonist R848 and irradiated splenocyte feeders. Bmem analysis during JHMV infection indicated Bmem accumulated prominently during chronic infection, similar to ASC, and revealed similar IgG secretion levels as ASC. However, ratios of ASC to Bmem were inverted when comparing brains and spinal cords. Overall, this protocol provides an optimized assay to define Bmem specificity, quantity, and isotype within inflamed CNS tissue.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Mice and infection

Wild type (WT) C57BL/6 mice were purchased from the National Cancer Institute (Frederick, MD). Six-to seven-week old mice were infected intracranially with 1000 plaque forming units (PFU) of the gliatropic monoclonal Ab derived variant of JHMV designated J.2.2v-1 (49). Cells isolated from brains and spinal cords were used for in vitro stimulation and ELISPOT assays. For immunization and splenic B cell analysis, six to seven-week-old mice were injected intraperitoneally (IP) with 1 ml of JHMV DM (9.8 × 106 PFU/ml). All animal procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the Cleveland Clinic and were conducted in compliance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals from the National Research Council.

2.2. Tissue dissection and cell isolation

Mice were perfused transcardially with 1 × PBS (Cleveland Clinic Research Institute Cell Services Core, Cleveland, OH) prior to decapitation. The skin was removed to expose the skull and a midline incision was made. The skull was then removed to resect the brain. Following brain dissection, the dorsal skin along the spinal column was removed to cut the spinal column at the level of the iliac crest. The spinal cord was flushed at the caudal opening of the spinal column with 1 × PBS using a 10ml syringe and an 18 gauge needle. Mononuclear cells from spleen, brain, or spinal cord were isolated from pooled organs of 3–4 mice per time point. Spleens were dissociated mechanically and red blood cells lysed. For cell isolation from brains or spinal cords, tissues were minced and digested in 5 ml RPMI 1640 (Cleveland Clinic Research Institute Cell Services Core, Cleveland, OH) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (FCS) (Hyclone, Logan, Utah), 100 μl of collagenase type I (100 mg/ml; Worthington Biochemical Corporation, Lakewood, NJ) and 20 μl (200U) of DNAse I (25 mg/ml) (Roche, Indianapolis, IN) for 40 minutes at 37°C. Collagenase activity was terminated by addition of 0.1 M EDTA (pH 7.2) at 37°C for 5 minutes. Following centrifugation, cells were resuspended in RPMI supplemented with 2% FCS, adjusted to 30% Percoll (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Pittsburgh, PA) and underlayed with 70% Percoll. After centrifugation for 30 minutes at 850 × g, mononuclear cells were recovered from the 30/70% Percoll interface and washed with RPMI supplemented with 2% FCS. Cells subjected to flow cytometric analysis were resuspended in fluorescent-activated cell sorter (FACS) buffer (PBS with 0.5% bovine serum albumin), whereas cells for in vitro stimulation were resuspended in RPMI 1640 containing 2 mM L-Glutamine, 2 mM nonessential amino acids, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 25 μg/ml gentamicin, 5 × 10−5 M 2-mercaptoethanol and 10% FCS (RPMI complete).

2.3. Flow cytometric analysis

Cells were incubated in FACS buffer supplemented with 1% mixed serum containing mouse serum (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA), goat serum (Atlanta Biologicals, Flowery Branch, GA), and horse serum (Vector Laboratories, Youngstown, OH) at 1:1:1 and 0.5 μl rat anti-mouse FcγIII/II mAb (2.4G2; BD Bioscience, San Jose, CA) per 106 cells for 20 minutes on ice prior to staining. Expression of cell surface markers was determined by staining on ice for 30 minutes with Ab specific for CD45 (30-F11; PerCP-Cy5.5), CD19 (1D3; PE-CF594), CD73 (AD2: PE-Cy7) (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA), IgM (eB131-15F9; PE), IgD (11–26; APC), and CD38 (90; PE) (eBioscience, San Diego, CA). Cells were analyzed on a BD LSRII flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA) using FlowJo (version 9.7.6) software (Tree Star, Ashland, OR). Doublet exclusion and live gating were applied as previously described (34). Dead cells comprised less than 10% of total SC or brain cells. For all results, plots are representative of 3–4 independent experiments.

2.4 Feeder cells and in vitro stimulation

Splenocytes from naïve C57BL/6 mice were used as feeder layers during B cell stimulation. Following red blood cell lysis and washing, resuspended splenocytes were irradiated with a dose of 3000 rad using a Shepherd irradiator (JL Shepherd and Associates, San Fernando, CA). For stimulation with viral lysate, 60 × 106 splenocytes in 10 ml RPMI complete were mixed with 0.5 ml JHMV lysate (2 × 106 PFU/ml) and incubated for 1 hour (h) at 37°c prior to irradiation. Irradiated feeders with or without viral lysate were washed three times at 450 × g for 5 minutes and resuspended at 5 × 105 cells in 0.1 ml RPMI complete or RPMI complete containing either 5 μg/ml CpG or 1 μg/ml R848 (InvivoGen, San Diego, CA) and supplemented or not with 10 ng/ml recombinant mouse IL-2 (Biolegend, San Diego, CA). Feeders with various stimulating agents were then plated into 96-well flat-bottom tissue culture plates (Corning, Tewksbury, MA). To block proliferation of stimulated CNS derived effector cells, cell suspensions were also irradiated at 3000 rad, washed, and resuspended in RPMI complete prior to stimulation. Effector cells from CLN, spleens, brains, or spinal cords of JHMV infected WT mice were resuspended at a starting concentration of 1 × 106, 1.25 × 104, and 1.25 × 104 cells per 0.1 ml RPMI complete containing 5 μg/ml CpG or 1 μg/ml R848 with or without IL-2 10 ng/ml, respectively. Two-fold dilutions (3 wells per dilution; 12 total wells per condition) were plated into 96-well flat-bottom tissue culture plates containing 5 × 105 irradiated feeder splenocytes and incubated for 10 hour or 2, 3, 4, or 5 days at 37°C and 5% CO2. After stimulation, cells were washed three times with 0.2 ml prewarmed 37°C RPMI complete per well and centrifuged at 190 × g for 5 minutes. After the last wash, cells were resuspended in 0.2 ml RPMI complete per well and transferred to ELISPOT plates.

2.5 ELISPOT assay

JHMV-specific IgG ASC were measured by ELISPOT assay as previously described (34). Briefly, 96-well PVDF MultiScreen HTS IP plates (EMD Millipore, Billerica, MA) were coated with JHMV DM (∼5 × 105 PFU/well) overnight at 4°C. Serial dilutions of cells plated in triplicate were incubated for 4 hour at 37°C and 5% CO2. ASC was detected by sequential incubation with biotinylated rabbit anti-mouse IgG (0.5 μg/ml; Southern Biotech, Birmingham, AL) overnight at 4°C, streptavidin horseradish peroxidase (1:1000; BD Biosciences, St. Louis, MO) for 1 h at room temperature, and filtered 3,3′-diaminobenzidine substrate (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) in 0.3% hydrogen peroxide. Brown spots were visible within 2–4 minutes and the reaction was terminated using cold tap water. Spots were counted using an ImmunoSpot ELISPOT reader (Cellular Technology Ltd., Shaker Heights, OH). Minimum and maximum spot size cutoffs were set to .0009 mm2 and .2295 mm2, respectively and spots were analyzed using diffuse processing and spot separation size of 3.00–5.00. Following automated counting, wells were re-counted manually for exclusion of artifacts. Wells containing ≥4 spots scored positive for virus-specific ASC. For analysis, 3–5 wells within a linear dilution range were averaged for each stimulation condition.

2.6 Statistical Analysis

Data were analyzed using Prism (version 6.0) software (GraphPad). Statistical significance between the experimental groups was assessed using a two-tailed paired t test. In all cases, a P value of <0.05 was considered significant. Data is representative of 2–3 experiments with 3–4 pooled mice per experiment.

3. Results

3.1 Conventional Bmem markers are expressed on diverse B cell phenotypes within the CNS

Several phenotypic markers have been described to distinguish murine Bmem from mature naïve or other B cell subsets in lymphoid organs, including CD80, PD-L2, CD38 and CD73 (29, 33). However, previous comparative analysis of temporally matched cervical lymph node (CLN) and CNS B cell subsets for expression of the activation marker CD80 and the GC B cell marker GL7 revealed distinct patterns (34). For example, a larger fraction of several CNS B cell phenotypes expressed CD80 compared to peripheral counterparts and expression was sustained, unlike transient expression in CLN. This suggested that conventional phenotypic patterns characterizing B cell subsets, including Bmem, in SLT are insufficient to reliably mark similar subsets in the CNS. We therefore asked if CD38 and CD73, common markers for murine Bmem within SLT, showed similar expression patterns on B cells derived from CLN versus brain during viral encephalomyelitis. The transmembrane receptor CD38 is involved in apoptosis, activation, differentiation, and proliferation (50). CD38 is highly expressed on naïve mature B cells and is downregulated during activation. Its expression is lowest on GC B cells and isotype-switched ASC. By contrast, isotype-switched Bmem exhibit prominent CD38 expression, while expression on GC independent IgM+ Bmem is unclear (29, 31, 50). Distinct from CD38, expression of CD73, a surface glycoprotein regulating extracellular ATP and adenosine levels, is low on naïve B cells but upregulated on antigen experienced and GC B cells (32). CD73 expression in SLT delineates several subpopulations of Bmem and is absent amongst plasmablasts and plasma cells (32, 33).

CD45hi CD19+ B cells from the brain at day 38 p.i. as well as four distinct differentiation subsets defined by their surface Ig as naïve mature B cells (IgD+IgM+), activated B cells (IgDintIgM+), pre-GC/GC/isotype-unswitched (IgDIgM+) Bmem and isotype-switched Bmem/ASC (IgDIgM) were thus compared to analogous CLN day 14 p.i. subsets for CD38 and CD73 expression (Fig. 1). These time points were chosen to reflect abundant B cell subsets in the respective organs. Figure 1A shows representative gating strategies of the four populations with naïve B cells represented by region 1, activated B cells by region 2 IgDIgM+ Bmem as region 3 and isotype-switched Bmem/ASC as region 4. Analysis focused on day 14 p.i. when GC formation in CLN is prominent and on day 38 p.i. when more differentiated isotype-switched B cells dominate over less differentiated B cells in the brain during JHMV persistence (20, 34). Consistent with a minor population of B cells forming GCs and thus a predominant IgD+IgM+ naïve B cell population in CLN throughout infection (Fig. 1A) (34), the vast majority of total CLN B cells (>90%) expressed CD38 at day 14 p.i. (Fig. 1B). While CD38 expression marked all naïve B cells, CD38 progressively decreased on B cells transitioning to an isotype-switched phenotype (Fig. 1B). CD38 expressing cells were reduced to 70% in IgDintIgM+ B cells, to 27% in IgDIgM+ pre-GC/GC B cells and 13% in IgDIgM isotype-switched cells (Fig. 1B; Populations 1,2,3, and 4, respectively, in Panel A), which comprise a relatively small proportion of CD19+ cells within the CLN (34). Brain CD19+ B cells revealed overall reduced CD38 expression (65%) compared to the CLN (Fig. 1C). While IgD+IgM+ B cells also all expressed CD38 (99%), a smaller proportion of more differentiated cells downregulated CD38 compared to their CLN counterparts. Although expression was progressively lower relative to the naïve population in activated (IgDintIgM+), pre-GC/isotype-unswitched Bmem (IgDIgM+), and isotype-switched B cells (IgDIgM), the percentage of CD38+ cells remained >50% even in the isotype-switched population (Fig. 1C).

Figure 1. Bmem markers on CNS infiltrating B cells have distinct surface expression from the periphery.

Figure 1

Brain and CLN cells isolated from pooled organs of JHMV infected mice at day 14 (CLN) and day 38 (brain) p.i. were analyzed for CD38 and CD73 expression. (A) Representative gating strategy for CD19+ infiltrating B cells in the brain and gating of IgD+ and IgM+ subsets in the brain and CLN. Representative density plots depict CD38 (B–C) and CD73 (D–E) expression among total CD19+, naïve IgD+IgM+, and IgDIgM isotype switched B cells within the CLN (B, D) and brain (C, E). Representative histograms depict CD38 or CD73 expression among naïve IgD+IgM+, activated IgDintIgM+, IgDIgM+, and isotype-switched ASC/Bmem IgDIgM B cells within the CLN and brain. Data is representative of 3–4 independent experiments.

The pattern of CD73 expression was even more diverse than CD38 between B cell subsets in CLN and brain (Fig. 1D and E). In CLN, the proportion of CD73+ cells in total CD19 B cell was <10%, coincident with sparse expression in naïve IgD+IgM+ B cells. Expression remained low on IgDintIgM+ B cells (~10%; Fig. 1D), but was increased on IgDIgM+ cells (41%). The proportion of CD73+ cells was the highest (80%) in isotype-switched IgDIgM B cells. This profile is consistent with CD73 upregulation on antigen experienced and GC B cells (32). Relative to CLN, CD73 expression was 4-fold higher (41%) among CNS infiltrating CD19+ B cells, reflecting higher proportions of activated and isotype-switched B cells accumulating in the CNS during persistence. However, with the exception of naïve B cells, CD73 was differently regulated on the corresponding B cell subpopulations within the brain (Fig. 1E). IgDintIgM+ B cells segregated into a population of no or low expressors and ~50% CD73 high expressors. The IgDIgM+ B cells were also split into a CD73 non-expressing and expressing phenotype, although CD73 expression levels were slightly lower than in IgDintIgM+ B cells. Isotype-switched IgDIgM B cells exhibited an even more pronounced decline in both the proportion and intensity of CD73 expression (Fig. 1E). Whether the distinct patterns of CD38 and CD73 expression on CNS versus CLN B cells reflects preferential recruitment or local influences remains unclear. Nevertheless, the data clearly indicate that activation or Bmem markers characterizing B cell subsets in lymphoid tissue are not suitable to identify CNS B cell subsets.

3.2. Bmem LDA optimized for SLT leads to minimal CNS Bmem conversion

Culture conditions designed to quantify virus-specific Bmem have largely been optimized using cells derived from lymphoid tissue and rely on various in vitro stimulation strategies to convert Bmem into ASC, which are then measured by ELISPOT in a separate plate. In vitro this process requires proliferation and thus prolonged stimulation more than 24 hours, the minimum time required to trigger division by Bmem (35). For instance, following LCMV infection maximal virus-specific Bmem conversion into ASC was initially achieved by stimulating splenocytes from LCMV infected mice at serial dilutions with irradiated LCMV infected carrier splenocytes as a source of viral antigen for 6 days p.i (35). Although in vitro stimulation often relies on nonspecific polyclonal activators as infected cells often provide insufficient antigen stimulus, specific antigen stimulation is more selective as it minimizes excessive B cell proliferation and bystander Ab production to irrelevant antigens (8). To apply virus-specific in vitro stimulation LDA to JHMV infection, we initially infected mice IP, harvested splenocytes at day 28 p.i. and stimulated serial cell dilutions in 96-well flat bottom culture plates with irradiated feeders pre-incubated with viral lysate for 4, 5, or 6 days at 37°C. After in vitro stimulation, and washing to remove virus and antibody, cells were transferred to virus-coated ELISPOT membrane plates and incubated at 37°C for 4 hour to detect virus-specific IgG ASC. ASC quantified after stimulation reflect both pre-existing ASC and ASC derived from Bmem. To quantify pre-existing ASC, serial splenocyte dilutions were subjected to a direct ex vivo 4 hour ELISPOT assay. Decreased ASC frequencies following incubation with viral lysate for 4 or 6 days relative to 5 days (data not shown), revealed 5 days stimulation was optimal for ASC survival and Bmem conversion following peripheral JHMV infection. However, splenocyte stimulation with feeders pre-incubated with viral lysate alone did not increase ASC frequencies relative to ex vivo ELISPOT analysis (Fig. 2A). These results suggested viral lysate provided insufficient stimulation to mediate Bmem conversion.

Figure 2. Stimulation conditions optimized for spleen Bmem conversion results in minimal conversion/survival for CNS isolated B cells.

Figure 2

Cells isolated from spleen (A), brain (B), or spinal cord (C) of infected mice at day 28 p.i. were stimulated for 5 days under various conditions including: 1) CpG, 2) irradiated feeders pre-incubated with viral lysate, 3) CpG with irradiated feeders, or 4) CpG with irradiated feeders pre-incubated with viral lysate. After culture, virus-specific IgG secreting ASC were enumerated by ELISPOT using virus coated plates. Pre-existing ASC numbers were determined by 4 hour (h) direct ex vivo ELISPOT. Data represents the mean±SEM ASC per 106 cells based on cells plated prior to CpG stimulation from 3–4 pooled mice. ASC frequencies per animal were determined using the average frequencies of 3–5 wells showing spots within linear dilution range. Data are representative of 2 independent experiments. Significant differences between conditions at 4h and 5 days indicated by * p≤.05, ** p≤.01, *** p≤.001, and **** p≤.0001.

Bmem proliferation and conversion to ASC can be stimulated using pokeweed mitogen (PWM) or TLR agonists, including synthetic oligonucleotide CpG (TLR9 agonist) and R848 (TLR7/8 agonist), which selectively convert Bmem, but not naïve B cells into ASC (36, 37, 4244, 51). We therefore initially used CpG as a common polyclonal activator to specifically enhance conversion of splenic Bmem and not naïve B cells from JHMV immune mice. CpG was added to either irradiated feeders alone or feeders pre-incubated with viral lysate to stimulate JHMV Bmem for 4, 5, or 6 days as described above. ELISPOT analysis revealed 5 days stimulation was superior to 4 or 6 days in achieving highest ASC frequencies (data not shown). Furthermore, optimal CpG mediated Bmem to ASC conversion was independent of viral lysate (Fig. 2A). Virus-specific IgG ASC frequencies were 2-fold higher (~300) following stimulation compared to direct ex vivo ELISPOT analysis (~150). Lastly, splenocyte CpG stimulation for 5 days in the absence of feeders decreased ASC recovery compared to direct ex vivo ELISPOT analysis suggesting feeders provide survival factors.

The same in vitro stimulation method used for JHMV immune splenocytes was applied to analyze virus-specific IgG Bmem in brain and spinal cord following intracranial JHMV infection. Moreover, surface IgG+ CD138 B cells indicative of Bmem are detectable at day 28 p.i. during persisting JHMV infection (20). To examine Bmem specificity, single cell suspensions from brains and spinal cords at day 28 p.i. were serially diluted and stimulated under optimal conditions previously determined for splenic B cells using CpG for 5 days in the presence of irradiated feeders with or without viral lysate. Cells were then transferred to ELISPOT plates and assessed for virus-specific IgG ASC (Fig. 2B). We focused on IgG as the vast majority (~70%) of isotype switched virus specific ASC in the CNS secrete IgG isotype Ab, with a minor contribution of IgA secreting ASC (52). Pre-existing virus-specific ASC were measured in a direct 4 hour ex vivo ELISPOT assay. In contrast to splenocytes, neither brain or spinal cord cells revealed Bmem to ASC conversion, as indicated by no increase in spots relative to the numbers obtained from direct ex vivo ELISPOT analysis. This finding was independent of addition of viral lysate. Rather than increasing, virus-specific ASC after CpG stimulation were actually 3-fold lower in the brain (~1 × 103 ASC) and 2-fold lower in the SC (~2 × 103 ASC) relative to pre-existing ASC (Fig. 2B,C). This suggested that cell death during strong stimulation and prolonged culture of CNS cells or loss in the washing/transfer procedure leads to premature attrition of pre-existing ASC. This is supported by studies with LCMV, which have suggested direct ex vivo ASC assays may yield higher ASC frequencies than those observed after prolonged culture, thereby complicating calculations and potentially underestimating ASC converted from Bmem (35).

3.3 In vitro stimulation reduces pre-existing ASC from the CNS

The discrepancy in Bmem conversion after stimulation in the spleen versus CNS implied that while the CNS environment can sustain Bmem or ASC survival, survival is limited when explanted. We therefore assessed how distinct in vitro stimulation conditions including the TLR agonists CpG (TLR9) and R848 (TLR7/8) affect CNS derived pre-existing virus-specific IgG ASC. To minimize cell death due to prolonged culture, incubation was limited to 2 days, which increased ASC frequencies compared to 4 or 5 days stimulation in initial studies (data not shown). Pre-existing ASC were measured in serial dilutions of CNS-derived cells at day 28 p.i. using four conditions: a) direct ex vivo 4 hour ELISPOT, b) stimulation with R848 or CpG for 10 hour, which is insufficient time for Bmem to differentiate into ASC (35), c) stimulation with R848 or CpG supplemented with feeders for 2 days, but irradiation of CNS cells to block cellular division (35) and lastly d) culture with splenocyte feeder cells only for 2 days to assess whether feeder-derived supplements sustain pre-existing ASC. Following the distinct culture conditions, serially diluted cells were transferred to ELISPOT membranes and assessed for virus-specific IgG ASC 4 hour later. ASC obtained from in vitro stimulation controls were compared to pre-existing ASC obtained by direct ex vivo ELISPOT (Fig. 3). Fig. 3 only includes data from R848 stimulation as CpG and R848 stimulation produced interchangeable results (data not shown). 10 hour culture with R848 already reduced ASC frequencies relative to ex vivo ASC numbers to ~30% in both brain and spinal cord-derived cells. However, 2 day stimulation conditions did not further reduce pre-existing ASC numbers. All culture conditions yielded ~1 × 103 pre-existing ASC within the brain and ~5 × 103 within the spinal cord, which represents a ~3-fold reduction compared to direct ASC assays. These consistent control results suggested multiple wash steps and transfer to ELISPOT membranes reduce ASC recovery ~3-fold. Importantly, the differing in vitro controls abrogating Bmem conversion all resulted in similar virus-specific IgG ASC, demonstrating reproducible calculation of pre-existing ASC. Exposure of pre-existing ASC to the same culture conditions as Bmem thus underestimates ASC but provides a more valid approach to assess ASC derived from Bmem conversion relative to pre-existing ASC, than comparison to ASC numbers obtained from direct ex vivo ELISPOT.

Figure 3. In vitro stimulation protocol reduces ASC numbers.

Figure 3

Cells isolated from brain or spinal cord of infected mice at day 38 p.i. were stimulated for 10 hour or 2 days with R848 in the presence of irradiated splenocyte feeders as indicated. Direct ex vivo ASC quantification was conducted using 4 hour incubation on ELISPOT plates. For 10 hour ASC controls, CNS cells were cultured with splenoctye feeders with R848 stimulation. For 2 day (d) ASC controls, splenocyte feeders were cultured with irradiated CNS cells with R848 stimulation or CNS cells without stimulation. After culture, virus-specific IgG secreting ASC were enumerated by ELISPOT using virus coated plates. Data represents the mean+SEM ASC per 106 cells prior to stimulation from 3–4 pooled mice. ASC frequencies per animal were determined using the average frequencies of 3–5 wells showing spots within linear dilution range. Data are representative of 1–2 independent experiments.

3.4 Optimizing CNS Bmem conversion

To optimize CNS derived Bmem conversion, we next examined the effects of TLR agonists R848 and CpG under various culture conditions using CNS cells from persistently infected mice at days 28–38 p.i. R848 stimulation of human PBMCs and murine splenocytes has been recently shown to enhance Bmem conversion compared to CpG stimulation, suggesting R848 may be a superior stimulating agent (42). Bmem conversion was evaluated relative to pre-existing ASC numbers obtained from irradiated CNS cells stimulated for 2 days under the same conditions (Fig. 4A). As expected, feeder cells themselves showed no detectable ASC even when cultured with TLR agonists (Fig. 4A). Coculture of brain-derived cells with feeders alone improved recovery of virus-specific ASC, relative to no feeders, supporting feeders provide survival factors. However, feeders did not significantly enhance ASC frequencies in spinal cord-derived B cells (Fig. 4A), suggesting they may be less prone to death than brain counterparts. CpG stimulation resulted in a modest increase of virus-specific ASC in brain derived, but not spinal cord-derived cells compared to feeders alone. By contrast, R848 stimulation significantly increased virus-specific ASC by 2 to 3-fold relative to pre-existing ASC in both brain and spinal cord cells. Irradiation of CNS effector cells reduced CpG and R848 ASC frequencies back to feeder only culture frequencies (Fig. 4A). These results confirmed that increased ASC frequencies following TLR stimulation indeed resulted from Bmem proliferation and conversion. Importantly, as Bmem proliferation is only initiated after 24 hours, the 2 day stimulation period limits proliferation to 1–2 divisions thereby minimizing artificially high Bmem frequencies due to numerous divisions (35, 38, 39).

Figure 4. 2 day R848 stimulation provides optimal ASC conversion for CNS-derived Bmem.

Figure 4

(A) Cells isolated from brain or spinal cord of infected mice at day 38 p.i. were incubated with irradiated feeders plus R848 or CpG for 2 days as indicated. (B) Cells isolated from brain or spinal cord of infected mice at day 28 p.i. were stimulated with CpG or R848 with or without IL-2 in the presence of irradiated splenocyte feeders for 2 or 3 days. After culture, virus-specific IgG secreting ASC were enumerated by ELISPOT using virus coated plates. Data represents the mean+SEM ASC per 106 cells based on cells plated prior to stimulation from 3–4 pooled mice. ASC frequencies per animal were determined using the average frequencies of 3–5 wells showing spots within linear dilution range. Data are representative of 2 independent experiments. Significant differences between conditions in panel A indicated by * p≤.05, ** p≤.01, *** p≤.001. In panel B significant differences comparing conditions either at day 2 or day 3 indicated by * p≤.05, ** p≤.01, and p≤.05, respectively; significant differences comparing conditions between days 2 and 3 indicated by # p≤.05.

Supplementation of media with IL-2 either using ConA conditioned medium or recombinant IL-2 has been shown to enhance cell survival and Bmem conversion in in vitro Bmem stimulation assays (35, 43). To test whether CNS Bmem conversion could be further increased, we expanded stimulation times to 3 days and supplemented media with IL-2. However, neither increased culture duration nor addition of IL-2 to CpG stimulation enhanced Bmem to ASC conversion in brain derived cells, independent of stimulation for 2 or 3 days (Fig. 4B). Furthermore, IL-2 only improved ASC recovery after 3 day, but not 2 day culture in CpG stimulated spinal cord cells. While prolonged culture time modestly increased brain derived virus-specific ASC following R848 stimulation, IL-2 addition had no enhancing effects. Prolonged stimulation also had no beneficial effects on Bmem conversion in R848 stimulated spinal cord cells and IL-2 only modestly increased ASC after 3 days stimulation. Overall, these results confirmed superior stimulation by R848 compared to CpG, independent of prolonged culture or IL-2 addition. We therefore chose R848 stimulation for 2 days as optimal for Bmem conversion in CNS derived cells.

3.5 ASC:Bmem ratios during JHMV infection

JHMV infection induces virus-specific IgG ASC expansion within the draining cervical lymph nodes (CLN) at day 14 p.i coincident with GC formation (34, 52). Virus-specific IgG initially accumulates in the brain and spinal cord, but preferentially increases in the spinal cord, the site of viral persistence and low, but ongoing inflammation (20). Increased virus specific IgG in spinal cords by day 21 p.i. correlates with the overall increased fraction of ASC compared to the brain (20, 53). Using the assay conditions optimized above, we assessed Bmem numbers relative to ASC in the CNS during JHMV infection at the onset of ASC emergence at day 14 and during persistence at day 35 p.i. (52). Reproducibility and kinetics of virus-specific IgG Bmem and pre-existing ASC was evaluated in the brain and spinal cord in independent experiments (Fig. 5A, B), as biological variability in immune responses to infection and efficiency in CNS cell isolation can lead to differences in absolute frequencies between multiple experiments. Pre-existing ASC were calculated using the average of 4–5 wells in a linear dilution range from irradiated CNS cells cultured with R848 and feeders. Virus-specific IgG Bmem were calculated by subtracting the average pre-existing ASC from the average number of ASC obtained after R848 stimulation. Virus-specific ASC progressively accumulated within the CNS during persistence, with elevated frequencies in spinal cord at day 35 p.i., confirming previous results (20, 52). Virus-specific Bmem frequencies in the brain were comparable to ASC at day 14 p.i. (~500 cells), and increased between 5 to 8-fold by day 35 p.i. (Fig. 5A, B). Furthermore, Bmem surpassed ASC frequencies in the brain by 1.2 to 2-fold by day 35 p.i. Spinal cords also revealed similarly low frequencies of Bmem and ASC at day 14 p.i., with both increasing by day 35 p.i. Although the increase relative to day 14 p.i. ranged between 3 to 5-fold, virus-specific ASC frequencies were overall 3-fold higher than Bmem. While the ratio of ASC to Bmem was ~0.7 in the brain, it was inverted at 3.0 in spinal cord when averaging results from 2 separate experiments. Furthermore, in contrast to preferential accumulation of ASC in the spinal cord during chronic infection, Bmem were similar within the brain and spinal cord at day 35 p.i. It remains unclear whether the site of enhanced viral persistence preferentially affects ASC over Bmem accumulation, or whether the spinal cord environment can mediate local conversion of Bmem to ASC.

Figure 5. Bmem emerge with similar kinetics to ASC in the CNS.

Figure 5

(A–B) Cells isolated from brain or spinal cord of infected mice at day 14 and 35 p.i. CNS cells were stimulated with R848 in the presence of irradiated splenocytes. After culture, virus-specific IgG secreting ASC were enumerated by ELISPOT using virus coated plates. Pre-existing ASC numbers are calculated from R848 stimulated irradiated CNS cells incubated with splenocyte feeders. Bmem numbers are calculated based on total ASC numbers after R848 stimulation minus pre-existing ASC numbers. Data represents the mean±SEM ASC per 106 cells based on cells plated prior to nonspecific stimulation from 3–4 pooled mice. Mean values are calculated from 5 wells showing spots within the linear dilution range. Two independent experiments revealed similar ASC/Bmem kinetics throughout infection. (C) Spot size of brain or spinal cord-derived ASC following direct ex vivo 4 hour incubation (ASC) and 10 hour or 2 day R848 stimulation. R848 counted highlights ASC counted for 2 day R848 stimulation well. (D) Mean±SEM ASC spot size following direct ex vivo ELISPOT (ASC) and ASC after 2 day R848 stimulation (R848) in the brain and spinal cord (SC). Data are representative of 2–3 independent experiments. Significant differences between brain and spinal cord indicated by * p ≤.05, and ** p≤.01.

Detection of virus-specific Bmem in the CNS led us to examine Bmem derived ASC IgG secretion capacity compared to pre-existing ASC. Spot diameter and intensity reflect both Ig secretion rates and affinity, with large and intense spots indicative of more differentiated, high affinity ASC (5457). Therefore, we investigated Ig secretion by quantifying spot size of virus-specific IgG derived from converted ASC after 2 days R848 stimulation versus pre-existing ASC from direct ex vivo ELISPOT (58). As an additional control, ASC spot size after 10 hour R848 stimulation was compared to control for effects of in vitro stimulation on pre-existing ASC spot size (Fig. 5C). Quantification revealed no significant difference in ASC spot size after 10 hour stimulation versus direct ex vivo ELISPOT (data not shown). More importantly, virus-specific IgG spot size from brain derived ASC measured directly by ex vivo ELISPOT assays and those ASC formed 2 days post R848 stimulation was also similar at a mean spot size of 30–40μm2 (Fig. 5C, D). Similarly, spot size analysis of spinal cord-derived cells revealed no significant difference between ASC after R848 stimulation compared to direct ex vivo ELISPOT. Nevertheless, the mean spot size was 40–50 μm2, suggesting enhanced IgG secretion for ASC and Bmem in the spinal cord relative to brain (Fig. 5C, D). The in vitro stimulation assay established for CNS derived Bmem is therefore a useful tool to quantify and determine Bmem specificity and can be adapted to assess isotype variants and Ig secretion levels during heterologous CNS inflammation models.

4. Discussion

The presence of B cells with multiple differentiation phenotypes in the CNS following various insults, including infection, has reinvigorated research into mechanisms supporting their accumulation, function, and specificity. The recruitment of ASC into the CNS and their specificity following viral encephalomyelitis is well documented in animal models (52, 59). ASC have also been detected in the CSF of patients afflicted by viral encephalitis and multiple sclerosis (16, 6064). However, the presence of Bmem and their specificity has not been studied extensively due to methodological limitations in determining specificity. As Bmem require minimal stimulation to convert to ASC compared to naïve B cells (3), they are ideal candidates to locally differentiate and sustain Ab responses. Persisting antigen, T helper cells, cytokines, and TLR agonists all present in the inflamed CNS have the potential to induce Bmem differentiation into ASC (3, 8, 9, 65). During viral encephalitis, antigen specific Bmem may locally contribute to humoral responses and serve a protective role in controlling infectious virus. However, Bmem directed against self-antigens during neurodegeneration, autoimmunity, or injury, may enhance pathogenic responses.

JHMV induced acute encephalomyelitis resolving into persistence has provided an excellent model to study progression and maintenance of humoral responses within the CNS. The accumulation of isotype-switched IgG+ CD138 CD19+ B cells, characteristic of Bmem, in both the brain and spinal cord during persistent infection led us to assess their specificity using established Bmem to ASC conversion protocols developed for B cells in lymphoid organs. However, several unsuccessful trials to apply these procedures to CNS B cells prompted us to tailor culture conditions to enhance Bmem to ASC conversion as well pre-existing ASC survival.

To yield high numbers of viable CNS cells which retain all classical B cell surface markers, the protocol uses collagenase-based digestion of CNS tissue. The initial LDA in vitro culture conditions mainly differ from other LDA stimulation protocols by utilizing shorter R848 mediated TLR7/8 stimulation periods to circumvent B cell loss presumably due to cell death. Moreover, addition of irradiated feeder cells improved survival of ASC/Bmem, while IL-2 supplementation has no beneficial effect. Although the shortened 2 day stimulation period minimized cell death, significant cell loss in the wash and transfer process was evident by a similar reduction in pre-existing ASC after both 10 hour and 2 day stimulation compared to direct ex vivo ELISPOT. Although ex vivo stimulation directly on ELISPOT membranes thus appears ideal to minimize cell loss, prolonged incubation of cells on ELISPOT membranes leads to increased background, artefacts due to cell debris, and increased spot density due to high levels of Ab secretion. An obvious caveat of the in vitro stimulation on 96 well flat bottom culture plates is thus that Bmem and ASC frequencies may be underestimated by 3-fold as indicated by our control experiments with pre-existing ASC. In vitro stimulation controls inhibiting Bmem conversion are thus necessary to standardize cell loss and compare the ratio of Bmem to pre-existing ASC.

Another caveat of Bmem stimulation prior to ELISPOT analysis is the use of polyclonal stimulators such as TLR agonists, which induce rapid proliferation regardless of antigen specificity, thereby potentially overestimating Bmem numbers based on ASC conversion. In vitro stimulation utilizing feeders presenting virus antigen would limit non-specific, rapid proliferation resulting in a more accurate assessment of virus-specific Bmem. However, incubation of virus lysate with feeders was insufficient to convert Bmem in our system presumably due to limiting virus dose. Nevertheless, fairly short stimulation times of 2 days in addition to use of virus coated ELISPOT plates limit proliferation and the potential for skewed virus-specific IgG ASC within total IgG ASC. Although future studies aim to optimize stimulation using feeders incubated with distinct viral antigens to induce more physiologically relevant Bmem conversion, a caveat in the JHMV system is that spike protein binds to CEACAM1, which is highly expressed on B cells and itself a signaling molecule (6668).

In summary, our optimized LDA in vitro stimulation ELISPOT assay provides a tool for simultaneous analysis of CNS derived Bmem and ASC during neuroinflammatory diseases, including microbial infection, autoimmunity, or tissue injury. The relatively short 2.5–3 day combined in vitro stimulation LDA/ELISPOT procedure is more efficient than previously described 2–4 week stimulation ELISA based Bmem assays, which measure secreted Ab. The assay allows for assessment of Bmem antigen specificity, isotype and kinetic alterations throughout disease, and are complementary to enumerating Bmem based on surface marker profiles. Comparative assessment of Bmem in SLT and the CNS will aid in understanding the relationship between peripheral Bmem and CNS accumulation during disease and identifying tissue specific therapeutics to either enhance or diminish Bmem during neuroinflammatory diseases.

Highlights.

  • Memory B cell markers characterizing peripheral B cell phenotypes show more diverse expression patterns in the infected central nervous system (CNS)

  • TLR7/8 stimulation for 2 days prior to ELISPOT analysis achieves optimal conversion of CNS-derived memory B cells to ASC while minimizing cell loss

  • In vitro stimulation allows simultaneous assessment of antibody secreting cell and memory B cell isotype, antigen specificity, and temporal alterations during CNS inflammation

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by US National Institutes of Health grant NS086299. The funding source had no involvement in the study design, writing of the manuscript, decision to submit, or collection, analysis, and interpretation of data. We sincerely thank Mi Widness and Dr. Alice Valentin-Torres for preparation of splenocyte feeder cells and Mi-Hyun Hwang for viral CNS infection.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  • 1.Slifka MK, Ahmed R. Long-term humoral immunity against viruses: revisiting the issue of plasma cell longevity. Trends Microbiol. 1996;4:394–400. doi: 10.1016/0966-842X(96)10059-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Slifka MK, Antia R, Whitmire JK, Ahmed R. Humoral immunity due to long-lived plasma cells. Immunity. 1998;8:363–372. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(00)80541-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kurosaki T, Kometani K, Ise W. Memory B cells. Nat Rev Immunol. 2015;15:149–159. doi: 10.1038/nri3802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Taylor JJ, Pape KA, Jenkins MK. A germinal center-independent pathway generates unswitched memory B cells early in the primary response. J Exp Med. 2012;209:597–606. doi: 10.1084/jem.20111696. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Zuccarino-Catania GV, et al. CD80 and PD-L2 define functionally distinct memory B cell subsets that are independent of antibody isotype. Nat Immunol. 2014;15:631–637. doi: 10.1038/ni.2914. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Pape KA, Taylor JJ, Maul RW, Gearhart PJ, Jenkins MK. Different B cell populations mediate early and late memory during an endogenous immune response. Science. 2011;331:1203–1207. doi: 10.1126/science.1201730. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Dogan I, et al. Multiple layers of B cell memory with different effector functions. Nat Immunol. 2009;10:1292–1299. doi: 10.1038/ni.1814. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hebeis BJ, et al. Activation of virus-specific memory B cells in the absence of T cell help. J Exp Med. 2004;199:593–602. doi: 10.1084/jem.20030091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Aiba Y, et al. Preferential localization of IgG memory B cells adjacent to contracted germinal centers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107:12192–12197. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1005443107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Shimoda M, Koni PA. MHC-restricted B-cell antigen presentation in memory B-cell maintenance and differentiation. Crit Rev Immunol. 2007;27:47–60. doi: 10.1615/critrevimmunol.v27.i1.40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Duddy M, et al. Distinct effector cytokine profiles of memory and naive human B cell subsets and implication in multiple sclerosis. J Immunol. 2007;178:6092–6099. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.178.10.6092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Adlowitz DG, et al. Expansion of Activated Peripheral Blood Memory B Cells in Rheumatoid Arthritis, Impact of B Cell Depletion Therapy, and Biomarkers of Response. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0128269. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0128269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Lund FE. Cytokine-producing B lymphocytes-key regulators of immunity. Curr Opin Immunol. 2008;20:332–338. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2008.03.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Lino AC, Dörner T, Bar-Or A, Fillatreau S. Cytokine-producing B cells: a translational view on their roles in human and mouse autoimmune diseases. Immunol Rev. 2016;269:130–144. doi: 10.1111/imr.12374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Niino M, Hirotani M, Miyazaki Y, Sasaki H. Memory and naive B-cell subsets in patients with multiple sclerosis. Neurosci Lett. 2009;464:74–78. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2009.08.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Krumbholz M, Derfuss T, Hohlfeld R, Meinl E. B cells and antibodies in multiple sclerosis pathogenesis and therapy. Nat Rev Neurol. 2012;8:613–623. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2012.203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Michel L, et al. B Cells in the Multiple Sclerosis Central Nervous System: Trafficking and Contribution to CNS-Compartmentalized Inflammation. Front Immunol. 2015;6:636. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2015.00636. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Metcalf TU, Griffin DE. Alphavirus-induced encephalomyelitis: antibody-secreting cells and viral clearance from the nervous system. J Virol. 2011;85:11490–11501. doi: 10.1128/JVI.05379-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Cepok S, et al. Accumulation of class switched IgD-IgM- memory B cells in the cerebrospinal fluid during neuroinflammation. J Neuroimmunol. 2006;180:33–39. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2006.06.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Phares TW, DiSano KD, Stohlman SA, Bergmann CC. Progression from IgD+ IgM+ to isotype-switched B cells is site specific during coronavirus-induced encephalomyelitis. J Virol. 2014;88:8853–8867. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00861-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Dang AK, Tesfagiorgis Y, Jain RW, Craig HC, Kerfoot SM. Meningeal Infiltration of the Spinal Cord by Non-Classically Activated B Cells is Associated with Chronic Disease Course in a Spontaneous B Cell-Dependent Model of CNS Autoimmune Disease. Front Immunol. 2015;6:470. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2015.00470. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ankeny DP, Guan Z, Popovich PG. B cells produce pathogenic antibodies and impair recovery after spinal cord injury in mice. J Clin Invest. 2009;119:2990–2999. doi: 10.1172/JCI39780. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Klein U, Rajewsky K, Küppers R. Human immunoglobulin (Ig)M+IgD+ peripheral blood B cells expressing the CD27 cell surface antigen carry somatically mutated variable region genes: CD27 as a general marker for somatically mutated (memory) B cells. J Exp Med. 1998;188:1679–1689. doi: 10.1084/jem.188.9.1679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Tangye SG, Liu YJ, Aversa G, Phillips JH, de Vries JE. Identification of functional human splenic memory B cells by expression of CD148 and CD27. J Exp Med. 1998;188:1691–1703. doi: 10.1084/jem.188.9.1691. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Amu S, Tarkowski A, Dörner T, Bokarewa M, Brisslert M. The human immunomodulatory CD25+ B cell population belongs to the memory B cell pool. Scand J Immunol. 2007;66:77–86. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3083.2007.01946.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Küppers R. Human memory B cells: memory B cells of a special kind. Immunol Cell Biol. 2008;86:635–636. doi: 10.1038/icb.2008.59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Sanz I, Wei C, Lee FE, Anolik J. Phenotypic and functional heterogeneity of human memory B cells. Semin Immunol. 2008;20:67–82. doi: 10.1016/j.smim.2007.12.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Xiao Y, Hendriks J, Langerak P, Jacobs H, Borst J. CD27 is acquired by primed B cells at the centroblast stage and promotes germinal center formation. J Immunol. 2004;172:7432–7441. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.172.12.7432. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Anderson SM, Tomayko MM, Ahuja A, Haberman AM, Shlomchik MJ. New markers for murine memory B cells that define mutated and unmutated subsets. J Exp Med. 2007;204:2103–2114. doi: 10.1084/jem.20062571. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Liu AH, Jena PK, Wysocki LJ. Tracing the development of single memory-lineage B cells in a highly defined immune response. J Exp Med. 1996;183:2053–2063. doi: 10.1084/jem.183.5.2053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ridderstad A, Tarlinton DM. Kinetics of establishing the memory B cell population as revealed by CD38 expression. J Immunol. 1998;160:4688–4695. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Conter LJ, Song E, Shlomchik MJ, Tomayko MM. CD73 expression is dynamically regulated in the germinal center and bone marrow plasma cells are diminished in its absence. PLoS One. 2014;9:e92009. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0092009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Tomayko MM, Steinel NC, Anderson SM, Shlomchik MJ. Cutting edge: Hierarchy of maturity of murine memory B cell subsets. J Immunol. 2010;185:7146–7150. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1002163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.DiSano KD, Stohlman SA, Bergmann CC. Activated GL7(+) B cells are maintained within the inflamed CNS in the absence of follicle formation during viral encephalomyelitis. Brain Behav Immun. 2017;60:71–83. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2016.09.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Slifka MK, Ahmed R. Limiting dilution analysis of virus-specific memory B cells by an ELISPOT assay. J Immunol Methods. 1996;199:37–46. doi: 10.1016/s0022-1759(96)00146-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Cao Y, et al. An optimized assay for the enumeration of antigen-specific memory B cells in different compartments of the human body. J Immunol Methods. 2010;358:56–65. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2010.03.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Pinna D, Corti D, Jarrossay D, Sallusto F, Lanzavecchia A. Clonal dissection of the human memory B-cell repertoire following infection and vaccination. Eur J Immunol. 2009;39:1260–1270. doi: 10.1002/eji.200839129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Tangye SG, Hodgkin PD. Divide and conquer: the importance of cell division in regulating B-cell responses. Immunology. 2004;112:509–520. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2567.2004.01950.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Bernasconi NL, Traggiai E, Lanzavecchia A. Maintenance of serological memory by polyclonal activation of human memory B cells. Science. 2002;298:2199–2202. doi: 10.1126/science.1076071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Kometani K, et al. Repression of the transcription factor Bach2 contributes to predisposition of IgG1 memory B cells toward plasma cell differentiation. Immunity. 2013;39:136–147. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2013.06.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Amanna IJ, Slifka MK. Quantitation of rare memory B cell populations by two independent and complementary approaches. J Immunol Methods. 2006;317:175–185. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2006.09.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Jahnmatz M, et al. Optimization of a human IgG B-cell ELISpot assay for the analysis of vaccine-induced B-cell responses. J Immunol Methods. 2013;391:50–59. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2013.02.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Walsh PN, et al. Optimization and qualification of a memory B-cell ELISpot for the detection of vaccine-induced memory responses in HIV vaccine trials. J Immunol Methods. 2013;394:84–93. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2013.05.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Crotty S, Aubert RD, Glidewell J, Ahmed R. Tracking human antigen-specific memory B cells: a sensitive and generalized ELISPOT system. J Immunol Methods. 2004;286:111–122. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2003.12.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Buisman AM, de Rond CG, Oztürk K, Ten Hulscher HI, van Binnendijk RS. Long-term presence of memory B-cells specific for different vaccine components. Vaccine. 2009;28:179–186. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.09.102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Wang FI, Hinton DR, Gilmore W, Trousdale MD, Fleming JO. Sequential infection of glial cells by the murine hepatitis virus JHM strain (MHV-4) leads to a characteristic distribution of demyelination. Lab Invest. 1992;66:744–754. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Lin MT, Hinton DR, Marten NW, Bergmann CC, Stohlman SA. Antibody prevents virus reactivation within the central nervous system. J Immunol. 1999;162:7358–7368. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Marques CP, et al. CXCR3-dependent plasma blast migration to the central nervous system during viral encephalomyelitis. J Virol. 2011;85:6136–6147. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00202-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Fleming JO, Trousdale MD, el-Zaatari FA, Stohlman SA, Weiner LP. Pathogenicity of antigenic variants of murine coronavirus JHM selected with monoclonal antibodies. J Virol. 1986;58:869–875. doi: 10.1128/jvi.58.3.869-875.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Vences-Catalán F, Santos-Argumedo L. CD38 through the life of a murine B lymphocyte. IUBMB Life. 2011;63:840–846. doi: 10.1002/iub.549. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Hawkins ED, et al. Quantal and graded stimulation of B lymphocytes as alternative strategies for regulating adaptive immune responses. Nat Commun. 2013;4:2406. doi: 10.1038/ncomms3406. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Tschen SI, et al. Recruitment kinetics and composition of antibody-secreting cells within the central nervous system following viral encephalomyelitis. J Immunol. 2002;168:2922–2929. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.168.6.2922. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Phares TW, DiSano KD, Stohlman SA, Segal BM, Bergmann CC. CXCL13 promotes isotype-switched B cell accumulation to the central nervous system during viral encephalomyelitis. Brain Behav Immun. 2016 doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2016.01.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Sibley LS, et al. ELISPOT Refinement Using Spot Morphology for Assessing Host Responses to Tuberculosis. Cells. 2012;1:5–14. doi: 10.3390/cells1010005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Thomson S. Methods in Molecular Biology, Volume 302: HANDBOOK OF ELISPOT: METHODS AND PROTOCOLS. Immunol Cell Biol. 2005;83:586–586. [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Feske ML, Medina M, Graviss EA, Lewis DE. In: Handbook of ELISPOT: Methods and protcocols. Kalyuzhny AE, editor. Vol. 792. Humana Press; 2012. pp. 229–241. chap. 18. [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Karulin AY, Lehmann PV. In: Handbook of ELISPOT: Methods and protocols. K AE, editor. Vol. 792. Humana press; 2011. pp. 125–143. chap. 11. [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Henn AD, et al. Modulation of single-cell IgG secretion frequency and rates in human memory B cells by CpG DNA, CD40L, IL-21, and cell division. J Immunol. 2009;183:3177–3187. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0804233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Metcalf TU, Baxter VK, Nilaratanakul V, Griffin DE. Recruitment and retention of B cells in the central nervous system in response to alphavirus encephalomyelitis. J Virol. 2013;87:2420–2429. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01769-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Burke DS, Nisalak A, Lorsomrudee W, Ussery MA, Laorpongse T. Virus-specific antibody-producing cells in blood and cerebrospinal fluid in acute Japanese encephalitis. J Med Virol. 1985;17:283–292. doi: 10.1002/jmv.1890170310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Jacobi C, Lange P, Reiber H. Quantitation of intrathecal antibodies in cerebrospinal fluid of subacute sclerosing panencephalitis, herpes simplex encephalitis and multiple sclerosis: discrimination between microorganism-driven and polyspecific immune response. J Neuroimmunol. 2007;187:139–146. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2007.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Kapoor H, et al. Persistence of West Nile Virus (WNV) IgM antibodies in cerebrospinal fluid from patients with CNS disease. J Clin Virol. 2004;31:289–291. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2004.05.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Linnoila JJ, Binnicker MJ, Majed M, Klein CJ, McKeon A. CSF herpes virus and autoantibody profiles in the evaluation of encephalitis. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2016;3:e245. doi: 10.1212/NXI.0000000000000245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Skoldenberg B, Kalimo K, Carlstrom A, Forsgren M, Halonen P. Herpes simplex encephalitis: A serological follow-up study. Synthesis of herpes simplex virus immunoglobulin M, A, and G antibodies and development of oligoclonal immunoglobulin G in the central nervous system. Acta Neurol Scand. 1981;63:273–285. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Geffroy-Luseau A, et al. TLR9 ligand induces the generation of CD20+ plasmablasts and plasma cells from CD27+ memory B-cells. Front Immunol. 2011;2:83. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2011.00083. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Williams RK, Jiang GS, Snyder SW, Frana MF, Holmes KV. Purification of the 110-kilodalton glycoprotein receptor for mouse hepatitis virus (MHV)-A59 from mouse liver and identification of a nonfunctional, homologous protein in MHV-resistant SJL/J mice. J Virol. 1990;64:3817–3823. doi: 10.1128/jvi.64.8.3817-3823.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Greicius G, Severinson E, Beauchemin N, Obrink B, Singer BB. CEACAM1 is a potent regulator of B cell receptor complex-induced activation. J Leukoc Biol. 2003;74:126–134. doi: 10.1189/jlb.1202594. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Khairnar V, et al. CEACAM1 induces B-cell survival and is essential for protective antiviral antibody production. Nat Commun. 2015;6:6217. doi: 10.1038/ncomms7217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES