Abstract
This study sought to understand the regulation of an osteoclastic protein-tyrosine phosphatase (PTP-oc), a positive regulator of osteoclast activaty. Our past studies suggested that PTP-oc is regulated post-transcriptionally. The 3’-UTR of PTP-oc mRNA contains a target site for miR17. During osteoclastic differentiation, there was an inverse relationship between the cellular levels of miR17 (expressed as one of the six cluster genes of miR17~92) and PTP-oc mRNA. Overexpression of pre-miR17~92 in mouse osteoclast precursors reduced PTP-oc mRNA level and the size of the derived osteoclasts; whereas deletion of miR17~92 or inhibition of miR17 resulted in the formation of larger osteoclasts containing more nuclei that expressed higher PTP-oc mRNA levels and created larger resorption pits. Thus, PTP-oc-mediated osteoclast activation is modulated in part by miR17~92, particularly miR17. The miR17~92 osteoclast conditional knockout (cKO) mutants, generated by breeding miR17~92loxp/loxp mice with Ctsk-Cre mice, had lower Tb.BV/TV, Tb.BMD, Tb.Conn-Dens, Tb.N, and Tb.Th, but larger Tb.Sp, and greater bone resorption without a change in bone formation compared to littermate controls. The cKO marrow-derived osteoclasts were twice as large, contained twice as many nuclei, and produced twice as large resorption pits as osteoclasts of littermate controls. The expression of genes associated with osteoclast activation was increased in cKO osteoclasts, suggesting that deletion of miR17~92 in osteoclasts promotes osteoclast activation. The cKO osteoblasts did not show differences in cellular miR17 level, alkaline phosphatase activity, and bone nodule formation ability. In conclusion, miR17-92 negatively regulates the osteoclast activity, in part via the miR17-mediated suppression of PTP-oc in osteoclasts.
Keywords: Osteoclasts, Cell/Tissue signaling, genetic animal models, molecular pathways – remodeling, epigenetics
Introduction
Bone resorption is essential for all aspects of bone physiology, and is determined by the formation, activity, and survival of mature osteoclasts. The most prevalent disease associated with an abnormality in bone resorption is osteoporosis. Understanding the molecular mechanism(s) regulating not only the formation but also the activation of osteoclasts is needed in order to fully understand the pathophysiology of the various subtypes of osteoporosis. Over the past two decades, enormous advances have been made in our understanding of the regulation of osteoclastogenesis at the molecular level, but much less is known about the molecular mechanisms controlling the activation of osteoclasts.
We have previously obtained compelling in vitro and in vivo evidence that a structurally unique, non-receptor, transmembrane protein-tyrosine phosphatase (PTP) in osteoclasts, which we termed PTP-oc,(1) is a potent positive regulator of osteoclast activation.(2,3) The molecular mechanism of PTP-oc to regulate osteoclast activation is highly complex. On the one hand, PTP-oc acts through direct dephosphorylation of the inhibitory phosphotyrosine-527 residue (pY527) of Src to activate its protein-tyrosine kinase (PTK) activity.(2,4–8) This in turn promotes: 1) the Src PTK-dependent activation of the JNK2/NFκB pathway to enhance osteoclast survival,(4) 2) the Src PTK-dependent phosphorylation of pY759-β3-integrin to activate the β3-integrin signaling,(8) 3) the Src PTK-dependent phosphorylation of pY525/526 of Syk to stimulate the ITAM signaling,(8) which acts in concert with the β3-integrin signaling to further promote osteoclast adhesion, spreading, and cytoskeleton re-organization,(3,8–10) and 4) the Src PTK-dependent phosphorylation and inactivation of Shp1, a key mediator of the ITIM signaling,(8) which is a negative regulatory mediator of osteoclast differentiation and activity,(11) leads to suppression of the inhibitory ITIM/Shp1 signaling in osteoclasts, resulting in further activation of osteoclasts.
Additionally, PTP-oc also acts in a Src PTK-independent manner to inactivate the forward signaling of EphA4, which is a potent negative regulatory mechanism for osteoclast activation,(12) through dephosphorylation of several key phosphotyrosine residues at the juxtamembrane domain of EphA4.(13) This results in further activation of osteoclasts. The foregoing findings bring forth an intriguing concept that PTP-oc enhances activation of osteoclasts, not only by activating stimulatory pathways (i.e., JNK2/NFκB, β3-integrin, and ITAM/Syk signaling), but also by suppressing inhibitory pathways (i.e., ITIM/Shp1 and EphA4 signaling) in both Src PTK-dependent and –independent manners.
Knowledge of how PTP-oc is regulated is important, not only with respect to the understanding of the physiological or pathological function of this osteoclastic enzyme in bone-wasting diseases, but may also allow future development of rational basis for PTP-oc-based therapies for these diseases. In this regard, we found that certain resorption activators (e.g., PTH, PGE2, IL-1α, or 1,25(OH)2D3) increased PTP-oc mRNA and protein levels,(5,6) but these effectors had no effect on the PTP-oc promoter activity in osteoclasts.(14) These findings strongly suggest that PTP-oc is regulated through post-transcriptional controls of gene expression.
There is now increasing evidence that miRNAs are key post-transcriptional regulators of gene expression. Because a previous study has shown that the expression of a structurally related PTP (PTPRO) mRNA is in part regulated by miR17,(15) this study sought to evaluate in vitro whether PTP-oc expression in mouse osteoclasts is in part regulated negatively by miR17, which is expressed as one of the six cluster genes of miR17~92 (i.e., miR17, miR18, miR19a, miR19b, miR20, and miR92), and in vivo whether conditional deletion of miR17~92 in osteoclasts would lead to activation of osteoclasts and the subsequent loss of bone mass in mice. In this report, we provide compelling evidence that PTP-oc mRNA is a target of miR17 in osteoclasts and that mutant mice with conditional deletion of miR17~92 in osteoclastic cells yielded a bone phenotype of significant loss of trabecular bone that was associated with marked increases in expression of PTP-oc, activated osteoclasts, and increased bone resorption.
Materials and Methods
Materials
Culture media were purchased from Life Technologies (Grand Island, NY) and fetal bovine serum (FBS) was obtained from Hyclone Laboratories (Logan, UT) or Atlantic Biologicals (Flowery Branch, GA). Tissue culture supplies were from Falcon (Oxnard, CA). The enhanced chemiluminescence detection kit for Western blots was obtained from Millipore (Billevica, MA). Recombinant soluble receptor activator of NFκB ligand (RANKL) and macrophage colony stimulating factor (m-CSF) were from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA) and CalBiochem (San Diego, CA), respectively. The anti-pY173-Vav3, anti-Vav3, antibodies were purchased from BioSource International (Camarillo, CA), or Santa Cruz Biotechnology. Ad5-CMV-Cre or Ad5-CMV-eGFP adenoviral vectors were produced by Baylor College of Medicine (Houston, TX). All other reagents were obtained from either Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO) or Fisher Scientific (Los Angeles, CA).
Animals
Breeding pairs of homozygous miR17~92loxp/loxp mice (Mirc1tm1.1Tyj/J, stock # 008458, Jackson Labs., Bar Harbor, ME) were provided to us by Dr. Chandrasekhar Kesavan of our Musculoskeletal Disease Center. The miR17~92 osteoclast conditional knockout (cKO) mice were generated by breeding miR17~92loxp/loxp mice (in C57BL/6 genetic background) with Ctsk-Cre transgenic mice (also in C57BL/6 genetic background) obtained from Dr. Laurie Glimcher of the Harvard Medical School. The schematic representation of the breeding protocol is outlined in Suppl. Fig. S1. This breeding protocol should yield 25% cKO mutants (Ctsk-Cre+/miR17~92loxp/loxp), 50% phenotypically normal littermates (Ctsk-Cre−/miR17~92loxp/loxp or Ctsk-Cre−/miR17~92loxp/−) and 25% heterozygotes (Ctsk-Cre+/miR17~92loxp/−). The phenotypically normal littermates were used as the controls for comparison. Mice are housed in groups of 4 mice per cage, fed a regular Envigo/Harlan TekLad 7001 rodent diet (Placentia, CA, USA), and in a 12-hr light/12-hr dark cycle.
All animal protocols were reviewed and approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of the Jerry L. Pettis Memorial VA Medical Center.
Genotyping assay
Tail vertebrate tissue (2–3 mm) was taken from each pup at weaning under anesthesia, and was digested overnight using the DNeasy kit (Qiagen, San Diego, CA). The quality and quantity of genomic DNA were analyzed by the 260 nm/280 nm absorbance ratio.
Genotyping of miR17~92loxp/loxp mice was performed according to the PCR-based genotyping assay recommended by the Jackson Labs. The homozygous loxp+/+ mutants yielded a single PCR product of 289-bp; whereas the littermate controls produced a single PCR product of 255-bp. Heterozygous mutants gave both PCR bands. The Ctsk-Cre transgenic mice were also genotyped with a PCR-based assay(16,17) using the following set of three primers: 1) 5’-TTATTCCTTCCGCCAGGATG-3’, 2) 5’-TTGCTGTTATACTGCTTCTG-3’, and 3) 5’-TAGTTTTTACTGCCAGACCG-3’. The PCR reaction mix was first hot-started at 94°C for 1.5 min, followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 30 sec, extension 54°C for 1 min, and renaturation at 72°C for 1 min. The reaction was ended with 2 min at 72°C. The WT littermates showed a single product of 135-bp, whereas the Ctsk-Cre transgenic mice showed a product of 300-bp with or without the 135-bp product band. Homozygous osteoclast miR17~92 cKO mutants were mice homozygous for miR17~92loxp/loxp and positive for Ctsk-Cre. Heterozygous mutants were those mice heterozygous for miR17~92loxp/loxp and positive for Ctsk-Cre; whereas littermate controls would be either homozygous or heterozygous for miR17~92loxp/loxp but negative for Ctsk-Cre (Suppl. Fig. S1).
Cell cultures
Primary marrow-derived osteoclasts were generated from bone marrow osteoclast precursors cells of 8- to 10-weeks-old miR17~92 cKO mice or littermate controls according to the procedure described previously.(12) The average size of the derived tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP)-positive, multinucleated (> two nuclei), osteoclasts was determined at 4× magnification using the OsteoMeasure™ system (OsteoMetrics, Decatur, GA), and individual osteoclasts were counted per frame for the entirety of each 24-well area by an investigator who did not know the identity of the treatment groups. The number of nuclei was counted by tabulation for each osteoclast and segmented into groups of a factor of 5.
Primary osteoblasts were isolated from calvarias of 7- to 10-week-old cKO mutants or littermate controls by collagenase digestion as described previously(18,19) and were maintained in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS and antibiotics. Cells at passages 1 to 3 were used in this study.
Generation of pLL-pre-miR17~92 expression plasmid construct
To generate pre-miR17~92 expression construct, the DNA fragment containing the miR17~92 precursor sequence that comprises the stem-loop structure and 120-bp upstream and 120-bp downstream flanking regions was PCR-amplified with C57BL/6J mouse genomic DNA as the template. It was then subcloned into HpaI and XhoI sites of the pLL3.7 vector (Addgene, Cambridge, MA). The ligated product was transformed into E. coli XL2 blue (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA) and the colonies containing the expression construct were selected by ampicillin resistance and confirmation for the presence of miR-17 sequence by DNA sequencing.
To transfect primary marrow osteoclast precursors, cells were treated with 0.6 µg of either pLL3.7 plasmid (empty vector) or pLL-pre-miR17~92 construct in the presence of the Effectene Transfection Reagent (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). After 5 days of the RANKL and m-CSF treatment, total RNAs were extracted from transfected cells using miRNeasy kit (Qiagen). The PTP-oc mRNA (normalized against Ppia mRNA) and miR17 (normalized against U6 RNA levels) were determined as described below.
Quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) assays
The cellular mRNA levels of PTP-oc, Cre, and those genes typically associated with osteoclastogenesis or those associated with osteoclast activation were measured by qPCR and normalized against the housekeeping gene, Ppia mRNA, as previously described.(12,13) The primer sequences of each test gene are shown in Suppl. Table S1. The data [normalized against Ppia (cyclophilin) mRNA] were analyzed with Opticon® Monitor Software 2.0. The relative fold change was calculated by the threshold cycle (ΔCT) method.
Cellular miR17 assay
The cellular levels of miR17 (or miR19a) were measured as follows: a miR17 (or miR19a) TaqMan-based specific PCR primer with a stem-loop sequence for reverse transcription (RT) was synthesized by Applied Biosystems (Foster City, CA, USA). Ten ng of total RNAs were used in each reverse transcription (RT) reaction. Reactions were incubated at 16°C for 30 min., 42°C for 30 min and 85°C for 5 min. The reverse-transcribed cDNA was used as template in qPCR reaction using TaqMan Small RNA Assay kit (Applied Biosystems). Samples were incubated at 95°C for 10 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 15s and 60°C for 1 min. The relative level miR17 was normalized against the U6 gene. All reactions were run in duplicate. Results are reported as fold of untreated controls.
The assay for the binding site for miR17 on the 3’UTR of PTP-oc mRNA
Briefly, total RNAs were isolated from primary osteoclasts, and cDNA was prepared by RT-PCR. A 1.2-kb fragment corresponding to the entire 3’UTR domain of PTP-oc mRNA was PCR-amplified using the cDNA as the template with the following primer set: forward primer, 5’-ATCAGTTCAAGCGATCGCTCCTCCCTTGCTTCCAGAGT-3’ and reverse primer, 5’-ATCAGTTCAAGCGGCCGCACCCAGAGAATCTCCTGTCG-3’. The underlined sequences are the restriction site for Sgf I and Not I, respectively. The PCR product was then cloned into the SgfI and Not I sites of the luciferase reporter gene-expressing pMir target vector (OriGene Technologies, Inc., Rockville, MD). The gel-purified ligated product was then transformed into E. coli DH5α strain (Zymo Research, Irvine, CA). The positive clones containing the expression construct were selected by kanamycin resistance. The plasmid inserts of several positive clones were then isolated and the presence of the 3’UTR domain of the PTP-oc mRNA was confirmed by sequencing. A clone containing the correct sequence of the 3’UTR of PTP-oc mRNA was expanded. The plasmid was isolated and transfected into HEK293T cells in the presence or absence of 2.5 µM of the locked nuclei acid (LNA)-based miR17 mimic (has-miRNA-17-5p miRCURY LNA) or the miRCURY LNA negative control (both from Exiqon, Woburn, MA), using the Effectene transfection reagent (Qiagen). After 24 hrs, the cells were lyzed and the luciferase reporter gene activity was determined with a commercial luciferase assay kit (Promega Luciferase Assay Systems kit).
Resorption pit formation assay
The resorption pit formation assay was performed as described previously.(5) Because targeted overexpression of PTP-oc(2) or deficient Epha4 expression(12) in osteoclast precursors did not significantly alter the number of mature osteoclasts formed in response to the RANKL/m-CSF treatment, we focused on measurements of the average pit area per resorption pit (determined by dividing total pit area by the number of pits measured), which was reported as an index of the average bone resorption activity per osteoclast. Accordingly, the total area of ~50 resorption pits was determined with the OsteoMeasure™ system by an investigator, who did not know the identity of the treatment group.
Immunofluorescent staining of the actin ring of osteoclasts
Very briefly, marrow-derived osteoclasts derived from cKO or littermate control mice, plated on uncoated glass slides, were paraformaldehyde-fixed and permeabilized with Triton X-100. The cells were then incubated with FITC-phalloidin at 37°C in 1% DMSO in PBS. The actin rings of the stained cells were visualized under a fluorescent microscope.
Mineralized nodule formation assay
Briefly, bone marrow cells of 8- to 10-week-old cKO or littermate controls were flushed out of long bones and were cultured in α-MEM containing 10% FBS, 50 µM penicillin/streptomycin, and 25 µM amphotericin B for 24 hrs. The adherent cells were further cultured for 48 to 96 hrs until confluent. The attached marrow stromal cells were isolated by trypsin and were plated at 1 × 105 cells per well in six-well plates and incubated with α-MEM containing 15% FBS until 90% confluent. Ten mM of β-glycerophosphate and 50 µg/mL ascorbic acid were then added for 28 days. Mineralized nodules were stained with Alizarin red and the number of mineralized nodules per well were counted under microscope.
The alkaline phosphatase activity (normalized against protein content) of cultured osteoblasts was measured as previously described.(19)
Western immunoblot assays
Relative levels of pY173-Vav3 and total Vav3 were determined by Western immunoblots as described previously(5,6) using a polyclonal antibody against pY173 residue of Vav3 and a polyclonal anti-Vav3 antibody, respectively.
Peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) bone parameter measurements
The pQCT scanning was performed on the femur of 8-week-old mice as described,(20) using a Stratec XCT 960 M pQCT (Norland Medical Systems, Madison, WI). Trabecular bone mineral content (BMC) and bone mineral density (BMD) were determined with the threshold setting of 230 to 630 mg/cm3. A threshold setting of 630 mg/cm3 was used to determined cortical bone parameters. The length of each femur was determined with a digital caliper. All measurements were performed without the knowledge of the identity of the treatment group.
Micro-computed tomography (μ-CT) bone parameter measurements
The three-dimensional bone phenotype was assessed on the right femur by μ-CT using a Scanco vivaCT40 μ-CT scanner (Scanco Medical, Brüttisellen, Switzerland) as previously described.(2) Trabecular measurements were performed at the secondary spongiosa of distal femur (at a site that was 10% of the full length of the femur from the distal end). Accordingly, a region of 0.8 mm in thickness at 10% of the full length from the distal end of each femur was scanned. The trabecular masks were defined in a semiautomatic manner, starting from the outer mask of the femur and application of 15 erosion cycles to ensure that no cortex was included in the measurement. This approach would adjust for the ~3% shorter femur in miR17~92 cKO mutants.
Bone histomorphometry
Static bone resorption and dynamic bone histomorphometric parameters were measured at the secondary spongiosa of the femur as previously described.(19)
Statistical analysis
Results are shown as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was determined with one-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey post-hoc test using the Systat 11 statistic software (Richmond, CA). The difference was considered significant when p < 0.05.
Results
PTP-oc expression in osteoclasts is negatively regulated by miR17
We inspected the 3’-UTR of both the murine and human PTP-oc mRNA for potential miRNA target sites using the online TargetScan database (www.targetscan.org), and identified three conserved putative target sites for miRNAs. They are located at: 1) position 204–211 for miR-133a/133b; 2) position 325–332 for miR25/32/92/363/367; and 3) position 900–906 for miR17/20/93/106 (Fig. 1A). We focused on miR17 because the mRNA of a structurally-related PTP (PTPRO) was previously shown to be negatively regulated by miR17.(15) To confirm that the 3’UTR of PTP-oc indeed contains a functional miR17 target site, we cloned the 3’UTR domain of the PTP-oc mRNA into the pMir Target Report Vector, which was then transfected into HEK293T cells. [HEK293T cells were used instead of osteoclastic cells, because HEK293T cells are readily transfectable, while the transfection efficiency of osteoclastic cells is notoriously low]. Fig. 1B shows that treatment with 3 µM of the LNA-based miR17 mimic, but not the negative control mimic, suppressed the expression of the luciferase reporter gene activity by ~80%, confirming the presence of a target site for miRNA17 in the 3’UTR region of the murine PTP-oc mRNA.
Figure 1. The 3’-UTR region of the murine and human PTP-oc mRNA contains three putative miRNA target sequences (A), particularly that for miR17 (B), existence of a negative relationship between miR17 and PTP-oc expression during RANKL-induced osteoclastogenesis (C and D), and regulation of miR17 expression in osteoclasts by certain resorption cytokines (E).
A: The location of putative miRNA target sequences on the 3’-UTR of PTP-oc mRNA predicated by the TargetScan software program. B: Treatment of the 3’UTR of the PTP-oc mRNA containing luciferase reporter gene expression plasmid by miR17 mimic suppressed the expression of luciferase. C and D: marrow osteoclast precursors (n = 3 per group) were treated with RANKL and m-CSF for 0, 3, or 6 days. C: The relative levels of PTP-oc mRNA and miR17 are shown as fold of controls (mean ± S.E.M.). * P<0.05. D: an inverse correlation between PTP-oc mRNA level and miR17 levels. E: Marrow osteoclast precursors were treated with RANKL/m-CSF for 6 days. The resulting osteoclasts were treated with 10 nM IL-1α, 10 nM 1,25(OH)2D3, 10 nM IL-6, 10 nM TNF-α, or solvent for 24 hrs. The cellular level of miR17 is reported as relative fold of the miR17 level in untreated control osteoclasts (mean ± SEM, n = 3). N.S. = not significant (i.e., P>0.05). In C and E, the dashed lines indicate the respective levels of PTP-oc mRNA and miR17 of untreated cells at each test time point.
We next tested whether miR17 expression in osteoclastic cells is associated with a corresponding change in PTP-oc expression during the RANKL/m-CSF-induced osteoclast formation. At 0, 3, and 6 days of the RANKL/m-CSF treatment of primary mouse marrow osteoclast precursors, the PTP-oc mRNA level was increased progressively. Conversely, there was a time-dependent decrease in the cellular miR17 level (Fig. 1C). Notably, there is an inverse relationship between the cellular level of miR17 and that of PTP-oc mRNA (Fig. 1D), suggesting a negative regulatory relationship between PTP-oc expression and miR17 expression in osteoclasts.
We have previously shown that certain resorptive cytokines (e.g., PTH, 1,25(OH)2D3, PGE2, and IL-1α, but not RANKL, IL-6, or TNF-α) upregulated the expression levels of PTP-oc mRNA and protein in osteoclasts.(5,6) Thus, we tested whether the miR17 expression in osteoclasts is correspondingly regulated by these resorption cytokines. As shown in Fig. 1E, IL-1α and 1,25(OH)2D3 each reduced the miR17 level; whereas IL-6 or TNF-α had no significant effect. These findings are consistent with the premise that certain resorption cytokines up-regulate expression of PTP-oc in part through suppression of the miR17 expression.
To evaluate whether overexpression of miR17 in osteoclasts would suppress the PTP-oc signaling, osteoclast precursors were transfected with a pLL3.7-based pre-miR17~92 expression plasmid or the empty pLL3.7 plasmid (control) vector. The transfected cells were treated with RANKL/m-CSF for 5 days to allow differentiation into osteoclasts. The pre-miR17~92 plasmid-transfected osteoclasts showed ~2.5-fold increase in cellular miR17 level compared with control osteoclasts, indicating a successful transfection. This overexpression was accompanied with ~50% decrease in cellular PTP-oc mRNA levels (Fig. 2A). Overexpression (or activation) of the PTP-oc signaling in osteoclasts has been shown to increase cellular pY173-Vav3 level, which is a key component of the PTP-oc/β3-integrin signaling.(8,12) Thus, we compared the average cell size and cellular pY173-Vav3 level in osteoclasts derived from pre-miR17~92-transfected cells with corresponding controls. The average cell size was 43 ± 8% smaller (p<0.05) and the cellular pY173-Vav3 level was 52 ± 17% lower (p<0.05) in the pre-miR17~92 plasmid-transfected osteoclasts (Fig. 2B). Accordingly, overexpression of miR17~92 in osteoclasts appears to suppress PTP-oc expression and its signaling.
Figure 2. Overexpression of miR17~92 (A–B) or suppression of miR17~92 expression by gene deletion (C–E) or antisense oligo (F–G) in osteoclasts altered PTP-oc expression, average cell size, number of nuclei, and resorption activity of osteoclasts.
A: The cellular level of miR17 and PTP-oc mRNA in the pLL-pre-miR17~92-transfected cells and the empty-vector-transfected control cells (mean ± SEM, n=6 for each). B (Top): A representative photomicrograph of empty vector control-treated or pLL-pre-miR17~92-treated osteoclasts. Bottom left: The relative average size of miR17~92-overexpressing osteoclasts and control osteoclasts. Results are shown as % of the average size of littermate control osteoclasts (mean ± SEM, n=3 per group). Bottom right: The relative cellular level pY173-Vav/total Vav3 (right) of the miR17~92-overexpressing osteoclasts and control osteoclasts (mean ± S.E.M., n= 4 per group). In C–E, osteoclast precursors derived from miR17~92loxp/loxp mice were transduced with either Ad5-CMV-GFP (Control cells) or Ad5-CMV-Cre (miR17~92-deficient cells). C: The cellular levels of miR17 (left) and PTP-oc mRNA (right) in miR17~92-deficient and control osteoclasts (mean ± S.E.M., n = 4 per group). D (Top): A representative photomicrograph of control or miR17~92-deficient osteoclasts. Bottom left: The average cell size of the miR17~92-deficient and control osteoclasts. Bottom right: The average number of nuclei per osteoclasts of miR17~92-deficient and control osteoclasts. (Mean ± SEM, n=4 per group in both panels). E: Average resorption pit size per pit determined on ~50 pits per dentine slice (mean ± S.E.M., n = 4–5 per group). In F–G, marrow osteoclast precursors were transfected with 25 pmol/mL of a mouse miR17-5p LNA-modified antisense-based inhibitor (miRCURY LNA™, with a fully phosphorothioate-modified backbone), a mouse miR19a-5p or control oligo for 4 hrs with lipofectamine. F: the cellular levels of miR17 or miR19a, respectively, in the marrow-derived osteoclasts (mean ± S.E.M., n= 3). G: effects of each miRNA inhibitor on the average size of the derived osteoclasts. Top: The representative photomicrograph of TRAP-stained osteoclasts of each group. Bottom: The relative cell size of derived osteoclasts from each treatment group (mean ± S.E.M., n=3 per group). The dashed lines represent the 100% of each respective control.
To rule out the possibility of off-target effects of overexpression of miR17~92, we examined whether deficient expression of miR17~92 in osteoclasts would increase PTP-oc expression level, cell size, number of nuclei, and bone resorption activity of osteoclasts in vitro. We transduced marrow osteoclast precursors of miR17~92loxp/loxp mice with an adenoviral vector expressing either Cre (Ad5-CMV-Cre) or GFP (Ad5-CMV-eGFP). At 4 days post-transduction, the cellular miR17 levels of Ad5-CMV-Cre-transduced cells were ~45% of that of Ad5-GFP-treated control cells (Fig. 2C). The osteoclasts derived from Ad5-Cre-transduced precursors showed 86 ± 32% increase in cellular PTP-oc mRNA levels (Fig. 2C), were 35–40% larger in the average cell size with an average of 75% more nuclei (Fig. 2D), and created ~2-fold larger resorption pits (Fig. 2E) than the Ad5-CMV-GFP-transduced control osteoclasts.
To evaluate if the observed effects of Ad5-CMV-Cre-mediated deletion of miR17~92 were due to deficient miR17 expression and not to other members of the miR17~92 cluster gene, we transfected osteoclast precursors with 25 pmol/mL of the LNA antisense-based inhibitor for mouse miR17-5p, miR19a-5p (another member of the miR17~92 cluster gene - included for comparison), or control LNA using lipofectamine for 4 hrs. Treatment with these anti-sense inhibitors reduced the cellular levels of miR17 or miR19a each to ~60% of the control level at 24 hrs (Fig. 2F). Inhibition of miR17, but not that of miR19a, yielded osteoclasts ~twice as large as control-LNA oligo-treated cells (Fig. 2G). These and foregoing findings support the contention that miR17 (and not miR19a) is a negative epigenetic regulator of PTP-oc expression and PTP-oc signaling in osteoclasts. We did not test the other members of the miR17~92 cluster gene (i.e., miR18, miR19b, miR20, and miR92). Because TargetScan analysis reveals that the 3’UTR domain of PTP-oc mRNA also contain potential target sites for miR20 and miR92, it is conceivable that the inhibition of these two miRNAs might yield similar enhancing effects on PTP-oc expression and osteoclast activation.
Characterization of bone phenotypes of miR17~92 osteoclast cKO mutant mice
To test whether deficient expression of miR17~92 in osteoclasts would lead to activation of osteoclasts and bone loss in vivo, we generated a colony of miR17~92 osteoclast cKO mutant mice by crossing miR17~92loxp/loxp mice with Ctsk-Cre mice. Cathepsin K is generally recognized as a marker of mature osteoclasts, which is believed to be expressed in low levels in osteoclast precursors.(21) We evaluated whether the proximal promoter of Ctsk that drives the Cre recombinase expression in Ctsk-Cre transgenic mice is also specific for mature osteoclasts but not their precursors. [The proximal promoter of Ctsk may have different cell-type-specificity, because the native promoter contains much more regulatory elements than just the proximal promoter]. Thus, we measured, by qPCR, the relative expression level of Cre mRNA in osteoclast precursors of Ctsk-Cre transgenic mice during the course of m-CSF/RANKL-mediated osteoclastic differentiation. The undifferentiated osteoclast precursors (without the RANKL/m-CSF treatment) expressed almost undetectable levels of Cre mRNA (i.e., ΔCt = ~35 cycles in qPCR). As the precursors differentiated to osteoclasts during the 6 days RANKL/m-CSF treatment, there was a highly significant (P<0.001, ANOVA) time-dependent increase in the expression level of Cre mRNA in osteoclasts starting from day 1 of the RANKL treatment (Suppl. Fig. S2). It is noteworthy that the Cre expression level after two or three days of the RANKL treatment was each clearly detectable (top panel) and could be considered substantial and were 80 to 160-fold of that of the basal level. Thus, it is conceivable that there might be sufficient Cre expression even at the early stages of osteoclastic differentiation to mediate the deletion of the miR17~92 gene.
The level of miR17 and miR19a in marrow-derived cKO osteoclasts was each reduced to ~30% of those of marrow-derived osteoclasts generated from littermate controls (Suppl. Fig. S3A), confirming that the miR17~92 gene was indeed significantly knocked down in osteoclastic cells of these mice. These cKO marrow-derived osteoclasts also showed ~2-fold increase in PTP-oc mRNA compared to control osteoclasts (Suppl. Fig. S3B).
The body weight of 8 week-old male or female cKO mutants was not different from that of littermate controls of corresponding gender, but the femur length of cKO mutants of either gender was shorter significantly (P<0.05) by 3–4% (Suppl. Table S2). The pQCT measurements reveal that miR17~92 cKO mutants of both genders exhibited ~20% and 10–24% reduction in trabecular bone mineral content (Tb.BMC) and trabecular bone mineral density (Tb.BMD), respectively, along with ~7% increase in the endosteal circumference in the femur compared to femurs of corresponding littermate controls (Suppl. Table S2). The cortical BMC (Ct.BMC) of either gender was lower by ~10%, but there were no significant differences in cortical BMD (Ct.BMD) or cortical thickness (Ct.Th) between cKO mutants and corresponding littermate controls. There was also no difference in the periosteal circumference at mid-shaft. Accordingly, deficient expression of miR17~92 in osteoclasts yielded similar bone phenotype in male and female mutant mice.
We also performed μ-CT analysis to further characterize the bone phenotype of the mutant mice (Fig. 3). The male miR17~92 cKO mutant mice had significantly lower Tb.BV/TV, Tb.BMD, Tb.Conn-Dens, Tb.N, and Tb.Th, as well as a significant increase in Tb.Sp. In contrast, the Ct.BV/TV, Ct.BMD, Ct.Th, and cortical porosity of the cKO mutants at mid-shaft were mostly not different from those of bones of littermate controls. Thus, the reduction in bone mass in miR17~92 cKO mutant mice was much larger in trabecular bone than in cortical bone. The female mutant mice showed very similar μ-CT bone phenotype (Fig. 3).
Figure 3. μCT evidence that miR17~92 cKO mutants lost substantial amounts of trabecular bone compared to littermate control mice.
Top: The 3-dimensional reconstruction of trabecular bone structure at the secondary spongiosa of a representative 7-week-old male cKO mutant mouse or littermate control mouse. Bar = 100 µm. Bottom: The μ-CT trabecular and cortical parameters of 7-week-old cKO mutants and corresponding WT littermates of both genders (mean ± S.E.M., n=8–9 per group).
Characterization of osteoclast phenotype of miR17~92 osteoclast cKO mutant mice
We also characterized the marrow-derived osteoclasts of the cKO mutants. The total number of TRAP-positive, multinucleated, osteoclasts formed in vivo from cKO marrow precursors was ~20% less than those formed from the same number of precursors of littermate controls (Fig. 4A), but this decrease did not reach the statistically significant level. Because there was no increase in the number of osteoclasts, it follows that deficient expression of miR17~92 in osteoclastic cells may not promote osteoclastogenesis. The average cell size and the average number of nuclei of osteoclasts from cKO mutants were each approximately twice as large as that of WT osteoclasts (Fig. 4B). These findings suggest that, similar to overexpression of PTP-oc(2) or deficient Epha4 expression,(12) deficient miR17~92 expression appears to enhance fusion of osteoclast precursors to form larger osteoclasts with more nuclei. The importance of osteoclast fusion in osteoclast activation is well documented by the strong correlation between bone resorption activity and the number of nuclei of osteoclasts in vivo.(22,23) Consistent with the greater functional activity, the average pit size created by each cKO osteoclast in the pit formation assay was also twice as large as that formed by osteoclasts of littermate controls (Fig. 4C). Since activation of the PTP-oc/β3-integrin signaling enhances osteoclast activity in part through cytoskeletal reorganization, polarization, and construction of sealing zone and ruffled borders(8), we also immunofluorescent-stained osteoclasts of cKO mutants and those of littermate controls for the actin ring and found that the fluorescent staining of the actin ring of cKO osteoclasts was more pronounced and more intense than littermate control osteoclasts (Fig. 4D).
Figure 4. Marrow-derived osteoclast precursors of miR17~92 cKO mutants yielded larger osteoclasts (A), with more nuclei (B), which have greater bone resorption activity (C), and formed more intense actin ring structure (D) than osteoclast precursors of littermate controls in response to RANKL/m-CSF in vitro.
A (Top): A representative photomicrograph of marrow-derived multinucleated osteoclasts of cKO mutants and littermate controls. Bars = 20 µm. Bottom left: The total number of osteoclasts (two or more nuclei) derived from 5,000 precursor cells. Bottom right: The relative average cell size of the derived osteoclasts. Results are shown as % of the average size of control osteoclasts (mean ± SEM, n=3–4 per group in both left and right panels). The dashed line indicates the 100% of the relative average cell size of the derived control osteoclasts. B: The average number of nuclei of the marrow-derived cKO osteoclasts and WT osteoclasts (mean ± S.E.M., n = 4 per group). C: Resorption pit formation assay was performed with marrow-derived osteoclasts from 4 littermate controls and 5 miR17~92 cKO mutant mice. Results are shown as average resorption pit size per pit determined on ~50 pits per dentine slice (mean ± S.E.M.). D. A representative photomicrograph of the immunofluorescently-stained actin ring of osteoclasts derived from littermate control mice (top) or from cKO mutants (bottom) plated on uncoated glass slides visualized under a fluorescent microscope. Scale bars = 20 µm.
We further evaluated whether deficient miR17~92 expression in osteoclast precursors would affect osteoclastogenesis, indirectly, by comparing the relative expression levels of known genes associated with osteoclastogenesis in osteoclasts derived from cKO or WT mice. The expression level of several genes known to be associated with osteoclast activation (Itgb3, Mmp9, Mmp3) was significantly increased in cKO osteoclasts, but none of the test genes that are associated with osteoclastogenesis (Rank, Traf6, Acp5, Mitf, and Nfatc1) was significantly increased (Suppl. Fig. S4).
Lack of effects of Ctsk-Cre-mediated deletion of miR17~92 in growth plate cartilage development
There is recent evidence that the Ctsk promoter used to drive Cre in these transgenic mice might not be entirely specific to osteoclastic cells.(24) We also found that Ctsk is not strictly specific for osteoclastic cells, as substantial expression of Cre was found in the cartilages and the brain, as well as a much lower level in the liver of cKO mouse (Fig. 5A). However, there was no detectable Cre expression in skeletal muscle or osteoblasts. To further investigate the specificity of the Ctsk promoter in the context of bone, we performed an immunohistochemical staining for the Cre recombinase expression on longitudinal thin sections of the femur of a Ctsk-Cre transgenic mice (Fig. 5B). While strong immunohistochemical staining of Cre (brownish color) was noted in osteoclasts in both the trabecular and cortical bones, no detectable immunostaining was seen in osteoblasts or in osteocytes.
Figure 5. Tissue-specificity of the Ctsk promoter (A), absence of immunohistochemical staining of Cre recombinase in osteoblasts and osteocytes in the Ctsk-Cre transgenic mice (B), and the lack of an effect of Ctsk-Cre-mediated disruption of miR17~92 on growth plate cartilage development (C).
A: Cre recombinase expression was measured in various cells and tissues of a cKO mouse. Briefly, total RNA was isolated from osteoclasts, osteoblasts, articular cartilage, brain, liver, skeletal muscle, and Xiphoid. Cre mRNA and Gapdh mRNA (as control for RNA loading) were detected by PCR. B: A representative immunohistochemical staining of Cre protein on a longitudinal section of growth plate and trabecular bone at the metaphysis (top and middle panels) and cortical bone on diaphysis at a site immediately underneath the secondary spongiosa (bottom panel) of distal femur of a Ctsk-Cre transgenic mouse. Top is the negative control without the antibody against Cre. The positive cells for Cre expression were stained brown. The slides were counter-stained in blue with hematoxylin. C: the length of the entire growth plate, proliferative zone, and hypertropic zone were measured on Goldner's stained longitudinal sections of the distal femurs of 8 weeks-old male cKO mutants and WT mice (mean ± S.E.M., n = 5 per group).
Because of the Cre expression was seen in cartilage, we evaluated if Ctsk-Cre-mediated deletion of miR17~92 would affect the growth plate cartilage development, as the femurs of these cKO mice were 3–4% shorter than those of littermate controls. Fig. 5C shows the Ctsk-Cre-mediated deletion of miR17~92 had no discernible effects on the lengths of the growth plate, proliferative zone, or hypertropic zone. Thus, despite a 3–4% reduction in femur length, deficient miR17~92 in chondrocytes in cKO mice may have only negligible effects on the growth plate development.
Lack of effects of Ctsk-Cre-mediated deletion of miR17~92 on osteoblast functions in vitro and bone formation in vivo
Because miR-17 promotes osteoblast differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) through down-regulation of Smurf1,(25) and because recent studies show evidence for transdifferentiation of chondrocytes into osteoblasts,(26,27) we cannot ignore the possibility that the Ctsk-Cre-mediated deletion of miR17~92 could still have indirect effects on osteoblast functions and bone formation, even though there was no detectable Cre expression in osteoblasts of the Ctsk-Cre transgenic mice (Fig. 5A and B). To test this possibility, we first measured miR17 level in isolated osteoblasts from three pairs of cKO mice and littermate controls and found no significant differences (94 ± 5% of WT controls, p=N.S., Fig. 6A), confirming that Ctsk-Cre-mediated deletion did not delete the miR17~92 gene in osteoblasts. We next determined the effect of the co-culture of cKO osteoclast precursors with osteoblasts of littermate controls and vice versa on the generation of large osteoclasts with more nuclei. Large osteoclasts with more nuclei were formed only when cKO osteoclast precursors were co-cultured with either littermate control or cKO osteoblasts (Fig. 6B), indicating that the phenotype of larger osteoclasts was due to deletion of miR17~92 in osteoclast precursors. Finally, we compared the differentiation status of cKO osteoblasts with littermate control osteoblasts by comparing cellular ALP activity (Fig. 6C) and bone nodule forming ability of their marrow stromal cells (Fig. 6D), and we detected no obvious difference in either parameter.
Figure 6. The Ctsk-Cre-mediated disruption of miR17~92 had no effects on cellular miR17 level and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity in osteoblasts and on bone nodule formation activity of marrow stromal cells, and deficient expression of miR17~92 in osteoclast precursors but not in osteoblasts promoted formation of large osteoclasts with more nuclei in a co-culture system.
A: The relative expression level of miR17 in isolated osteoblasts as relative % of the level of the miR17 in littermate control osteoblasts (mean ± S.E.M., n = 5 per group). The dashed line represents the 100% of the level of respective miRNA in littermate control osteoblasts. B (top left): Littermate control osteoclast precursors were co-cultured with littermate control osteoblasts. Top right: cKO osteoclast precursors were co-cultured with littermate control osteoblasts. Bottom left: Littermate control osteoclast precursors were co-cultured with cKO osteoblasts. Bottom right: cKO osteoclast precursors were co-cultured with cKO osteoblasts. Large TRAP-positive osteoclasts with large number of nuclei were formed in response to RANKL/m-CSF only if cKO osteoclast precursors were used in the co-cultures. C: Cellular ALP activity of osteoblasts (mean ± S.E.M., n = 3 each). D: Alizarin Red S-stained bone nodules formed from stromal cells of littermate control mice and cKO mutants, respectively, after 4 weeks of culture in an osteogenic medium. The mineralized nodule-bound Alizarin Red S dye was solubilized with cetypridinium chloride and read at 570 nm (mean ± S.E.M., n = 6 each).
To assess the effect of Ctsk-Cre-mediated deletion of miR17~92 on the bone formation in vivo, we performed dynamic bone formation histomorphometry on cKO and littermate control mice, and found no significant difference in MAR or in BFR/B.Pm between the two mouse strains (Table 1). Conversely, each measured static bone resorption parameter of cKO mutants was significantly greater than those of age- and gender-matched littermate controls. Thus, deficient expression of mR17~92 increased bone resorption but had no effects on bone formation in vivo.
Table 1.
Bone formation histomorphometry parameters of 8-week-old homozygous osteoclast miR17~92 cKO mice with corresponding littermate controls.*
| Parameters | Osteoclast miR17~92 cKO | WT littermates |
|---|---|---|
| Dynamic bone formation histomorphometric parameters | ||
| B.Pm$ (mm) | 8.49±1.60 | 5.71±1.42 |
| MAR (µm/day) | 1.68±0.26 | 1.58±0.09 |
| BFR/B.Pm (mm2 × 10−3/day/mm2) | 0.60±0.16 | 0.63±0.06 |
| Static bone resorption histomorphometric parameters | ||
| N.Oc (#) | 119.7±12.6 | 92.1±5.4 |
| Oc.Pm (mm) | 4.32±0.58# | 2.13±0.17 |
| Oc.S/BS (%) | 35.31±1.14### | 22.8±0.40 |
| N.Oc/T.Ar (#/mm2) | 79.61±7.85 | 56.3±6.26 |
| N.Oc/B.Pm (#/mm) | 10.64±0.42## | 8.32±0.21 |
Dynamic bone formation parameters were done in male cKO and littermate controls (n = 3–5 mice per group); whereas static bone resorption parameters were performed in female cKO and littermate controls (n = 3–4 mice per group).
B.Pm = bone surface; MAR = mineral apposition rate; BFR = bone formation rate; N.Oc = number of osteoclasts; Oc.Pm = osteoclast surface; Oc.S/BS = osteoclast surface per bone surface; N.Oc/T.Ar = osteoclast number per tissue area; and N.Oc/B.Pm = osteoclast number of per bone surface.
P < 0.05;
P<0.01;
P<0.001, when compared with corresponding littermate controls.
Discussion
There is indisputable evidence that miRNAs are key epigenetic regulators of most signaling pathways and cellular processes in various cell types, tissues, and organs; and osteoclasts are no exception.(28,29) In this report, we provide compelling in vitro and in vivo evidence that miR17~92, particularly miR17, is a negative regulator of the osteoclast activity and bone resorption. Our findings that miR17~92 cKO mutants had highly active osteoclasts and substantial loss of trabecular bone along with marked increase in osteoclastic resorption, that conditional deletion of miR17~92 in osteoclasts resulted in significant upregulation of genes associated with osteoclast activation but not those genes implicated in osteoclastogenesis, and that miR17~92 cKO marrow-derived osteoclast precursors did not yield more osteoclasts than littermate control osteoclast precursors in response to RANKL/m-CSF suggest that miR17~92 may not be a regulator of osteoclastogenesis. On the other hand, the miR17~92 cKO mutants showed significant increases in the number of osteoclasts per bone surface (N.Oc/B.Pm) and osteoclast surface per bone surface (Oc.S/BS). These findings are not compatible with our tentative conclusion that miR17~92 is not a regulator of osteoclastogenesis. In addition, cathepsin K, in the context of osteoclasts, is recognized as a marker for mature osteoclasts and is not expressed in less differentiated osteoclastic cells. Thus, the use of the Ctsk promoter may not result in the deletion of miR17~92 in undifferentiated osteoclasts, and as such may not allow definitive conclusion about osteoclastogenesis. Consequently, much additional work is needed to resolve this issue. Regardless of whether miR17~92 is a regulator of osteoclastogenesis, it is clear that miR17~92 is a potent negative regulator of osteoclastic activity and bone resorption.
This study also offers strong, albeit circumstantial, in vitro evidence that the suppressive action of miR17~92 on osteoclast activation is in part due to the miR17-mediated suppression of the expression of PTP-oc expression and signaling. That the bone and osteoclast phenotypes of miR17~92 osteoclast cKO mutants are very similar to that of mutant mice with targeted overexpression of PTP-oc in osteoclasts,(2) further suggests an inverse regulatory relationship between miR17~92 and PTP-oc in osteoclast activation. However, it is interesting to note that, unlike miR17~92 cKO mutants (this study) and Epha4 null mice(12), which showed the osteopenic and activated osteoclast phenotypes in both male and female mutant mice, transgenic overexpression of PTP-oc in cells of osteoclastic lineage, using the TRAP exon-1c promoter, yielded the osteoclast phenotype only in male mutant mice.(2) One of the possible explanations for the apparent gender differences between miR17~92 cKO mutants and PTP-oc overexpression mutants is that miR17-92 may act through other genes than PTP-oc to regulate osteoclastic resorption, which may contribute to the gender differences between the two mouse strains. Another potential explanation is that because the overexpression of PTP-oc in osteoclasts of the PTP-oc transgenic mice was driven by a relatively weak TRAP exon-1c promoter, the relative low overexpression levels of PTP-oc (i.e., ~ 2-fold increase), along with the apparent negative interaction between the estrogen receptor signaling and the PTP-oc-Src signaling may result in a subtle (less significant) osteoclast phenotype in female as opposed to male mutant mice.(2) Our future studies will address this important apparent discrepancy.
Three intriguing findings of this study may be relevant to the potential mechanism by which miR17~92 may act to regulate the activation process of mature osteoclasts. First, similar to activation of the PTP-oc signaling in osteoclasts – either through overexpression of PTP-oc(2) or deletion of EphA4,(12) deletion of miR17~92 increased osteoclast fusion. This conclusion is based on the fact that deficient expression of miR17~92 increased their average cell size and number of nuclei per cell of the osteoclasts, and deletion of miR17~92 in osteoclast precursors not only did not increase but even reduced the total number of osteoclasts formed in response to RANKL/m-CSF.
Second, osteoclast-stimulatory transmembrane protein (OC-Stamp)(30–32) [and the related dendritic cell-specific transmembrane protein (DC-Stamp)(33,34)], d2 isoform of vacuolar (H+) ATPase V0 domain (ATP6v0d2),(34,35) and osteoclast-associated receptor (Oscar)(36) have been demonstrated to be essential genes for osteoclast fusion. It is intriguing that the expression of these osteoclast fusion genes (OC-Stamp, ATP6v0d2, and Oscar) was not affected significantly by deficient expression of miR17~92. Since the expression of DC-Stamp, OC-Stamp, ATP6v0d2, and perhaps also Oscar, in osteoclasts is regulated by NFatc1,(31,34) and since the expression of NFatc1 was not altered by deficient expression of miR17~92, it is not entirely surprising that disruption of miR17~92 in osteoclasts did not have a significant effect on the expression levels of these genes. Nevertheless, the lack of increases in the expression of these osteoclast fusion genes raises the interesting possibility that miR17~92 modulates osteoclast fusion via mechanisms that are independent of or downstream to these osteoclast fusion genes.
There is increasing evidence that activation of Rac1 and/or Rac2 in osteoclasts may play an essential role in osteoclast fusion.(37–39) Rac1/Rac2 activation (through PTP-oc-dependent β3-integrin-mediated activation of Vav3) is a key downstream component of the PTP-oc/EphA4 pathway in osteoclasts.(12,13) In this study, overexpression of miR17~92 significantly suppressed the activation level of Vav3 in osteoclasts (Fig. 2B). It is possible that miR17~92 may regulate osteoclast fusion in part through modulation of the levels of activated Rac1/Rac2 through modulating the activation status of Vav3. This interesting alternative mechanism has merits and will be addressed in our future studies.
The third intriguing finding is that deficient expression of miR17~92 in osteoclasts also significantly upregulated the expression of β3-integrin, Mmp3 and Mmp9. The PTP-oc signaling has been shown to enhance osteoclast activation in part through enhancing the β3-integrin signaling pathway.(2,8) Activation of the β3-integrin signaling in osteoclasts triggers the cytoskeletal reorganization, formation of ruffled border and sealing zone, increased osteoclast migration and osteoclast adhesion to resorbing bone surface, and the release of degradative enzymes, including Mmp3 and Mmp9; all of which are required for activation of the osteoclast. Thus, it is highly likely that miR17~92 may also modulate osteoclast activity through the PTP-oc-induced Src-mediated activation of the β3-integrin signaling. Consistent with this possibility, osteoclasts derived from miR17~92 cKO mutants formed more pronounced and intense actin rings than those derived from littermate controls. The formation of actin rings is a cellular process regulated by the Src-mediated activation of the β3-integrin signaling.(8)
This study, however, has an important caveat. As previously reported by Yang et al.,(24) we also found that the Ctsk promoter is not strictly specific for osteoclasts, as substantial Ctsk promoter driven Cre expression is found in the cartilages (chondrocytes). The likely scenario that the Ctsk-Cre-mediated deletion of miR17~92 would also delete this cluster gene in chondrocytes could be a significant confounding issue with respect to endochondral bone formation and the overall skeletal development. However, despite the 3–4% reduction in the femur length in the cKO mutants, we found no significant differences in the total growth plate length, the length of the proliferative zone, or the length of the hypertrophic zone between the cKO mutants and age- and gender-matched WT littermates. We also did not find notable gross anatomy differences in the various types of cartilages or the key internal organs in the cKO mutants. Thus, we conclude that deficient expression of miR17~92 in chondrocytes has only marginal effects on developmental bone growth and the overall cartilage development.
We did not find any detectable Cre mRNA expression or any significant difference in the expression level of miR17 in the osteoblasts of the cKO mutant mice. However, recent studies have provided evidence for the transdifferentiation of chondrocytes into osteoblasts.(26,27) Thus, we cannot overlook the possibility that deletion of miR17~92 in chondrocytes could indirectly affect the differentiation and function of osteoblasts as well as bone formation. On the other hand, our findings that 1) the basal alkaline phosphatase activity of cKO osteoblasts was not different from that of WT osteoblasts, 2) the bone nodule formation ability of cKO marrow stromal cells was also not different from that of WT marrow stromal cells, and 3) there were no significant differences in the dynamic bone formation histomorphometric parameters between cKO mice and WT littermates do not support this possibility. Accordingly, we conclude that the Ctsk-Cre-mediated disruption of miR17~92 did not affect the differentiation and function of osteoblasts nor it affected bone formation.
Under normal conditions, bone resorption is tightly coupled to bone formation, in that an increase in bone resorption is usually followed by an increase in bone formation of equal magnitude. Thus, it is intriguing that the increase in bone resorption in miR17~92 cKO mice was not accompanied by a corresponding increase in bone formation. However, it should be noted that this apparent uncoupling of bone formation to bone resorption is not unique to these miR17~92 cKO mutant mice, as other transgenic mouse strains, e.g., PTP-oc transgenic mice,(2) Epha4 null mice,(12) Shp1 null mice,(40) and Claudin-18 null mice,(41) also showed an increase in bone resorption without a change in bone formation. Nevertheless, the mechanistic cause(s) for the apparent uncoupling of bone formation to bone resorption in miR17~92 cKO mutant mice is unclear at this time, and our future work will address the mechanisms contributing to the uncoupling of bone formation to resorption in these mutant mice.
In conclusion, this study provides the first piece of compelling evidence that miR17~92, particularly miR17, is a potent negative regulator of osteoclast activation in part through its suppression of the expression of PTP-oc and its signaling pathway. Our ultimate objective of this research is to develop a novel and effective anti-resorptive therapy that would target the miR17/PTP-oc/EphA4 regulatory axis of osteoclast activation. In this regard, the miR17 would appear to be an appealing drug target, as miR17 mimics can be developed into novel and effective anti-resorptive therapies. Although the current miRNA-based therapeutic technology has a number of challenges limiting its therapeutic utility, we are hopeful that the challenges of the miRNA-based therapeutic technology will soon be overcome and that the miR17-based therapies for osteoporosis and related bone-wasting diseases will become feasible.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
This work is supported by a Merit Review grant (IO1 BX002964) from the Biomedical Laboratory Research and Development Service, Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration, Office of Research and Development. The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position or policy of the Department of Veterans Affairs or the United States government. Dr. Lau is the recipient of a Research Career Scientist award (IK6 BX003782) from the Department of Veterans Affairs.
Footnotes
Authors’ roles: Study design: KHL. Study conduct: VS, CHR, MA, and MHS. Data collection: VS, MA, CHR, JT, and TDW. Data analysis: KHL, VS, and MHS. Data interpretation: KHL, VS, CHR, and MHS. Drafting manuscript: KHL. Revising manuscript content: KHL, VS, CHR, and MHS. Approving final version of manuscript: KHL, VS, CHR, MA, JT, TDW, and MHS. KHL takes responsibility for the integrity of the data analysis.
References
- 1.Wu LW, Baylink DJ, Lau KH. Molecular cloning and expression of a unique rabbit osteoclastic phosphotyrosyl phosphatase. Biochem J. 1996 Jun 1;316(Pt 2):515–23. doi: 10.1042/bj3160515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Sheng MH, Amoui M, Stiffel V, Srivastava AK, Wergedal JE, Lau KH. Targeted transgenic expression of an osteoclastic transmembrane protein-tyrosine phosphatase in cells of osteoclastic lineage increases bone resorption and bone loss in male young adult mice. J Biol Chem. 2009 Apr 24;284(17):11531–45. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M808324200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Sheng MH, Lau KH. Role of protein-tyrosine phosphatases in regulation of osteoclastic activity. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2009 Jun;66(11–12):1946–61. doi: 10.1007/s00018-009-8811-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Amoui M, Sheng MH, Chen ST, Baylink DJ, Lau KH. A transmembrane osteoclastic protein-tyrosine phosphatase regulates osteoclast activity in part by promoting osteoclast survival through c-Src-dependent activation of NFkappaB and JNK2. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2007 Jul 1;463(1):47–59. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2007.02.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Suhr SM, Pamula S, Baylink DJ, Lau KH. Antisense oligodeoxynucleotide evidence that a unique osteoclastic protein-tyrosine phosphatase is essential for osteoclastic resorption. J Bone Miner Res. 2001 Oct;16(10):1795–803. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.2001.16.10.1795. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Lau KH, Wu LW, Sheng MH, Amoui M, Suhr SM, Baylink DJ. An osteoclastic protein-tyrosine phosphatase is a potential positive regulator of the c-Src protein-tyrosine kinase activity: a mediator of osteoclast activity. J Cell Biochem. 2006 Apr 1;97(5):940–55. doi: 10.1002/jcb.20667. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Amoui M, Suhr SM, Baylink DJ, Lau KH. An osteoclastic protein-tyrosine phosphatase may play a role in differentiation and activity of human monocytic U-937 cell-derived, osteoclast-like cells. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2004 Oct;287(4):C874–84. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00294.2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Lau KH, Stiffel V, Amoui M. An osteoclastic protein-tyrosine phosphatase regulates the beta3-integrin, syk, shp1 signaling through respective src-dependent phosphorylation in osteoclasts. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2012 Jun 1;302(11):C1676–86. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00042.2012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Teitelbaum SL. Osteoclasts and integrins. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006 Apr;1068:95–9. doi: 10.1196/annals.1346.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.McHugh KP, Hodivala-Dilke K, Zheng MH, Namba N, Lam J, Novack D, et al. Mice lacking β3 integrins are osteosclerotic because of dysfunctional osteoclasts. J Clin Invest. 2000 Feb;105(4):433–40. doi: 10.1172/JCI8905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Umeda S, Beamer WG, Takagi K, Naito M, Hayashi S, Yonemitsu H, et al. Deficiency of SHP-1 protein-tyrosine phosphatase activity results in heightened osteoclast function and decreased bone density. Am J Pathol. 1999 Jul;155(1):223–33. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9440(10)65116-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Stiffel V, Amoui M, Sheng MH, Mohan S, Lau KH. EphA4 receptor is a novel negative regulator of osteoclast activity. J Bone Miner Res. 2014 Apr;29(4):804–19. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.2084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Lau KH, Amoui M, Stiffel V, Chen ST, Sheng MH. An Osteoclastic Transmembrane Protein-Tyrosine Phosphatase Enhances Osteoclast Activity in Part by Dephosphorylating EphA4 in Osteoclasts. J Cell Biochem. 2015 Aug;116(8):1785–96. doi: 10.1002/jcb.25137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Yang JH, Amoui M, Strong DD, Lau KH. Characterization and comparison of the intronic promoter of murine osteoclastic protein-tyrosine phosphatase, PTP-oc, with the human PTP-oc promoter. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2007 Sep 1;465(1):72–81. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2007.04.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Xu X, Hong Y, Kong C, Xu L, Tan J, Liang Q, et al. Protein tyrosine phosphatase receptor-type O (PTPRO) is co-regulated by E2F1 and miR-17-92. FEBS Lett. 2008 Aug 20;582(19):2850–6. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2008.07.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Maeda T, Merghoub T, Hobbs RM, Dong L, Maeda M, Zakrzewski J, et al. Regulation of B versus T lymphoid lineage fate decision by the proto-oncogene LRF. Science. 2007 May 11;316(5826):860–6. doi: 10.1126/science.1140881. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Nakamura T, Imai Y, Matsumoto T, Sato S, Takeuchi K, Igarashi K, et al. Estrogen prevents bone loss via estrogen receptor alpha and induction of Fas ligand in osteoclasts. Cell. 2007 Sep 7;130(5):811–23. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.07.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Lau KH, Kapur S, Kesavan C, Baylink DJ. Up-regulation of the Wnt, estrogen receptor, insulin-like growth factor-I, and bone morphogenetic protein pathways in C57BL/6J osteoblasts as opposed to C3H/HeJ osteoblasts in part contributes to the differential anabolic response to fluid shear. J Biol Chem. 2006 Apr 7;281(14):9576–88. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M509205200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Sheng MH, Lau KH, Beamer WG, Baylink DJ, Wergedal JE. In vivo and in vitro evidence that the high osteoblastic activity in C3H/HeJ mice compared to C57BL/6J mice is intrinsic to bone cells. Bone. 2004 Sep;35(3):711–9. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2004.05.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kapur S, Amoui M, Kesavan C, Wang X, Mohan S, Baylink DJ, et al. Leptin receptor (Lepr) is a negative modulator of bone mechanosensitivity and genetic variations in Lepr may contribute to the differential osteogenic response to mechanical stimulation in the C57BL/6J and C3H/HeJ pair of mouse strains. J Biol Chem. 2010 Nov 26;285(48):37607–18. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.169714. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Pang M, Martinez AF, Jacobs J, Balkan W, Troen BR. RANK ligand and interferon gamma differentially regulate cathepsin gene expression in pre-osteoclastic cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005 Mar 18;328(3):756–63. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.12.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Thompson ER, Baylink DJ, Wergedal JE. Increases in number and size of osteoclasts in response to calcium or phosphorus deficiency in the rat. Endocrinology. 1975 Aug;97(2):283–9. doi: 10.1210/endo-97-2-283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Gruber HE, Ivey JL, Thompson ER, Chesnut CH, 3rd, Baylink DJ. Osteoblast and osteoclast cell number and cell activity in postmenopausal osteoporosis. Miner Electrolyte Metab. 1986;12(4):246–54. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Yang W, Wang J, Moore DC, Liang H, Dooner M, Wu Q, et al. Ptpn11 deletion in a novel progenitor causes metachondromatosis by inducing hedgehog signalling. Nature. 2013 Jul 25;499(7459):491–5. doi: 10.1038/nature12396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Liu Y, Liu W, Hu C, Xue Z, Wang G, Ding B, et al. MiR-17 modulates osteogenic differentiation through a coherent feed-forward loop in mesenchymal stem cells isolated from periodontal ligaments of patients with periodontitis. Stem Cells. 2011 Nov;29(11):1804–16. doi: 10.1002/stem.728. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Xing W, Cheng S, Wergedal J, Mohan S. Epiphyseal chondrocyte secondary ossification centers require thyroid hormone activation of Indian hedgehog and osterix signaling. J Bone Miner Res. 2014 Oct;29(10):2262–75. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.2256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Zhou X, von der Mark K, Henry S, Norton W, Adams H, de Crombrugghe B. Chondrocytes transdifferentiate into osteoblasts in endochondral bone during development, postnatal growth and fracture healing in mice. PLoS Genet. 2014 Dec;10(12):e1004820. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004820. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Sugatani T, Hruska KA. MicroRNA-223 is a key factor in osteoclast differentiation. J Cell Biochem. 2007 Jul 1;101(4):996–9. doi: 10.1002/jcb.21335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Ji X, Chen X, Yu X. MicroRNAs in Osteoclastogenesis and Function: Potential Therapeutic Targets for Osteoporosis. Int J Mol Sci. 2016 Mar 09;17(3):349. doi: 10.3390/ijms17030349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Miyamoto H, Suzuki T, Miyauchi Y, Iwasaki R, Kobayashi T, Sato Y, et al. Osteoclast stimulatory transmembrane protein and dendritic cell-specific transmembrane protein cooperatively modulate cell-cell fusion to form osteoclasts and foreign body giant cells. J Bone Miner Res. 2012 Jun;27(6):1289–97. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.1575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Yang M, Birnbaum MJ, MacKay CA, Mason-Savas A, Thompson B, Odgren PR. Osteoclast stimulatory transmembrane protein (OC-STAMP), a novel protein induced by RANKL that promotes osteoclast differentiation. J Cell Physiol. 2008 May;215(2):497–505. doi: 10.1002/jcp.21331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Witwicka H, Hwang SY, Reyes-Gutierrez P, Jia H, Odgren PE, Donahue LR, et al. Studies of OC-STAMP in Osteoclast Fusion: A New Knockout Mouse Model, Rescue of Cell Fusion, and Transmembrane Topology. PLoS One. 2015;10(6):e0128275. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0128275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Yagi M, Miyamoto T, Sawatani Y, Iwamoto K, Hosogane N, Fujita N, et al. DC-STAMP is essential for cell-cell fusion in osteoclasts and foreign body giant cells. J Exp Med. 2005 Aug 1;202(3):345–51. doi: 10.1084/jem.20050645. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Kim K, Lee SH, Ha Kim J, Choi Y, Kim N. NFATc1 induces osteoclast fusion via up-regulation of Atp6v0d2 and the dendritic cell-specific transmembrane protein (DC-STAMP) Mol Endocrinol. 2008 Jan;22(1):176–85. doi: 10.1210/me.2007-0237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Lee SH, Rho J, Jeong D, Sul JY, Kim T, Kim N, et al. v-ATPase V0 subunit d2-deficient mice exhibit impaired osteoclast fusion and increased bone formation. Nat Med. 2006 Dec;12(12):1403–9. doi: 10.1038/nm1514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Kim N, Takami M, Rho J, Josien R, Choi Y. A novel member of the leukocyte receptor complex regulates osteoclast differentiation. J Exp Med. 2002 Jan 21;195(2):201–9. doi: 10.1084/jem.20011681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Wang Y, Lebowitz D, Sun C, Thang H, Grynpas MD, Glogauer M. Identifying the relative contributions of Rac1 and Rac2 to osteoclastogenesis. J Bone Miner Res. 2008 Feb;23(2):260–70. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.071013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Song RL, Liu XZ, Zhu JQ, Zhang JM, Gao Q, Zhao HY, et al. New roles of filopodia and podosomes in the differentiation and fusion process of osteoclasts. Genet Mol Res. 2014;13(3):4776–87. doi: 10.4238/2014.July.2.7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Hikiji H, Ishii S, Yokomizo T, Takato T, Shimizu T. A distinctive role of the leukotriene B4 receptor BLT1 in osteoclastic activity during bone loss. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Dec 15;106(50):21294–9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0905209106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Aoki K, Didomenico E, Sims NA, Mukhopadhyay K, Neff L, Houghton A, et al. The tyrosine phosphatase SHP-1 is a negative regulator of osteoclastogenesis and osteoclast resorbing activity: increased resorption and osteopenia in me(v)/me(v) mutant mice. Bone. 1999 Sep;25(3):261–7. doi: 10.1016/s8756-3282(99)00174-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Linares GR, Brommage R, Powell DR, Xing W, Chen ST, Alshbool FZ, et al. Claudin 18 is a novel negative regulator of bone resorption and osteoclast differentiation. J Bone Miner Res. 2012 Jul;27(7):1553–65. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.1600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.






