Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Human Kinetics logoLink to Journal of Human Kinetics
. 2025 May 29;98:243–252. doi: 10.5114/jhk/195638

International Standards for the 12-Minute Cooper Test on a Concept 2 Rowing Ergometer: Validity and Reliability of the Test

Robert Podstawski 1,*, Krzysztof Borysławski 2, Ferenc Ihász 3, Piotr Gronek 4
PMCID: PMC12360931  PMID: 40837517

Abstract

The aim of this study was to develop international standards for evaluating strength endurance abilities with the use of the 12-min Cooper Test on a rowing ergometer (12-MCTRE). The results from 1855 men (1421 from Poland and 434 from Hungary) and 2879 women (2502 from Poland and 412 from Hungary) aged 19–25 (mean age of 19.98 ± 1.04 and 20.36 ± 0.94, respectively) were collated between 2004 and 2020. The results were expressed on a uniform T-score scale for the 12-MCTRE. The validity of the 12-MCTRE was verified on a group of 28 male and 32 female participants based on the registered variables (power [W], energy expenditure [Kcal], training intensity distribution, and sexual dimorphism). On average, men covered a distance of 2535.6 m and women covered a distance of 1581.0 m during the 12-MCTRE. The results of the control group indicate that men covered a significantly (p < 0.001) longer distance (2691.5 m) than women (2116.1 m) in the 12-MCTRE, and the values of the remaining variables (power, energy expenditure, pace/500 m, and HRmax) were also significantly better in male participants. During the 12-MCTRE, both women and men remained in the very high effort zone for the longest period of time (516.9 s and 363.1 s, respectively). Women spent significantly more time (p < 0.001) in the high effort zone than men, but significantly less time in the maximal effort zone and the very high effort zone. The 12-MCTRE is an effective tool for evaluating strength endurance abilities in young adults.

Keywords: motor abilities, motor test, fitness, norms, university students, testing

Introduction

It is well known that physical activity constitutes one of the key determinants of a healthy lifestyle, and it delivers benefits not only for physical health, but also for social and mental health (Norton et al., 2010; Olszewska et al., 2017). Prospective observational studies have demonstrated that regular physical activity is inversely correlated with disease outcomes, including cardiovascular disease, thromboembolic stroke, hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, osteoporosis, obesity, colon cancer, breast cancer, anxiety, and depression (Haskel et al., 2007). Compelling new evidence has also been provided by studies of women (Greeg et al., 2003), stroke patients (Gallanagh et al., 2011), as well as patients affected by some types of cancers (McTiernan et al., 2019) and cognitive impairment (Mandolesi et al., 2018). Adequate and recommended levels of physical activity also affect motor abilities (Garber et al., 2011). Each component of motor fitness, including cardiorespiratory fitness, muscular strength and endurance, body composition, flexibility, and neuromotor fitness, has a beneficial impact on some aspects of health (American College of Sports Medicine, 1998).

Strength endurance abilities play a particularly important role in the group of motor abilities that affect physical health (Podstawski et al., 2019). Higher levels of cardiorespiratory and muscular fitness decrease health risks (Barlow et al., 2006; Cherouveim et al., 2022; Church et al., 2005; Fitz Gerald et al., 2004). Cardiorespiratory exercise reduces several risks associated with cardiometabolic diseases, although the magnitude of this effect is modest and tends to depend on individual characteristics and the exercise program, where a change in one cardiometabolic risk factor occurs independently of changes in other factors (Thompson et al., 2003). In middle-aged individuals and seniors whose physical activity levels meet qualitative and quantitative recommendations, improvements have been observed in hypertension, glucose intolerance, insulin resistance, dyslipidemia, and inflammatory markers, also during regaining of weight (Booth et al., 2000; Weis and Holloszy, 2007). In turn, improvements in muscular strength have been shown to significantly reduce cardiometabolic risks (Jurca et al., 2004), the risk of all-cause mortality (Fitz Gerald et al., 2004), cardiovascular risks (Gale et al., 2007), and the risk of functional limitations (Bårdstu et al., 2022) and nonfatal diseases (Clael and Bezerra, 2019).

Assessments of motor abilities help monitor and promote physical activity and improve the efficacy of the implemented exercise programs (Uysal et al., 2023). Physical activity programs should follow specific guidelines to minimize potential risks, including the intensity of exercise that exceeds the participants' physical ability or high relative intensity of exercise for persons with low fitness levels (Norton et al., 2010). For this reason, motor fitness tests are a valuable tool for assessing physical health. In adults, motor fitness tests should be conducted regularly (for example, every six months), and they should be accompanied by body composition analyses and medical exams (Kherada and Carneirob, 2023). Therefore, tests evaluating motor abilities (as components of the overall motor fitness) play an important role in health programs and should be conducted with the use of specifically designed motor tests (Podstawski and Żurek, 2022). The aim of this study was to propose international motor fitness standards and to evaluate strength endurance abilities in university students. In addition, the participants' physiological characteristics and sexual dimorphism were analyzed in detail during the study to determine the validity of the applied test.

Methods

Participants

The presented classification standards were developed in a study that was conducted in 2004–2020 on a large, representative, and random population sample. Potential participants were informed about the purpose of the study during obligatory physical education (PE), physiology and anthropomotorics classes. The results from 1855 men (1421 from Poland and 434 from Hungary) and 2879 women (2502 from Poland and 412 from Hungary), aged 19–25 (mean age of 19.98 ± 1.04 and 20.36 ± 0.94, respectively) were collated between 2004 and 2020. The study was conducted at the University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Poland, and the Eötvös Lóránd University in Szombathely, Hungary. International classification standards were applied to ensure the objectivity of the study. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were selected using the methodology proposed by Podstawski et al. (2015). The study involved students attending obligatory PE classes of 90 min per week. Students participating in extracurricular physical activities (members of sports teams) were not included in the study because their performance could significantly affect the results of this study. Students who were absent on the day of the evaluation or were not willing to participate were not included in the study either. A total of 157 women and 123 men presented medical certificates or had permanent damage to locomotor organs, and 100 women and 57 men refused to participate without providing a reason and therefore did not take part in the test.

Procedures

The research was performed in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki and upon the prior consent of the Ethics Committee of the University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn (decision No. 39/2011; approval date: 24 November 2011). All participants gave their written consent to participate in the study.

Measurements

Body height measurements were performed to the nearest 0.1 mm on a WB-150 medical scale with a stadiometer and a Martin anthropometer based on standard guidelines. Body mass was determined to the nearest 0.1 kg, and the results were used to calculate the participants' BMI. Strength endurance abilities were evaluated with the use of a 12-min test on a Concept 2 rowing ergometer (12-MCTRE) (Podstawski et al., 2022). During preliminary meetings held before the study, each participant performed one 12-MCTRE per week. Five trials of the 12-MCTRE were conducted to guarantee reliable results. Participants were provided with links to online instructional videos and rowing exercise programs.

Participants were instructed on how to correctly perform the 12-MCTRE before the commencement of the study, and they were allowed time to practice. The test was preceded by an active warm-up (10 min). The warm-up routine included jogging, along with general and specific resistance and stretching exercises (Frandkin et al., 2010).

Correct Technique for Performing the 12-Minute Cooper Test on a Rowing Ergometer

The participants' strength endurance abilities were evaluated based on the distance (in meters) covered during the 12-MCTRE. The row stroke was divided into two phases according to the technique presented by Podstawski et al. (2022) (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Rowing phases on a Concept 2 PM rowing ergometer.

Phase I (pulling the bar): from a starting position with the legs bent, arms straight, and the back leaning forward (Figure 1a), the lower limbs were gradually straightened (Figure 1b), the torso was abducted backward to a maximum of 45° (Figure 1c), and the bar was pulled to the chest (Figure 1d).

Phase II (bar inversion): from a position with the legs straight and the torso abducted and pulled back (Figure 1d), the arms were extended, the torso was bent forward (Figure 1c), and the lower limbs were flexed to a position with maximally bent legs, with the torso bent forward and the arms straight (Figure 1a).

When pulling the bar, the movement began with the lower limbs extended and the torso abducted backward, and it ended with the arms flexed and the bar pulled to the chest (between the nipples and the xiphoid process). During bar inversion, the movement began with the arms straight and the torso bent forward, and it ended with the knees bent (and the heels as close as possible to the buttocks).

Participants completed the distance within the given time limit (12 min).

The results of the control group (28 males and 32 females) during the 12-MCTRE performed on a Concept 2 PM5 standardized rowing ergometer (PH Markus, Szczecin, Poland), which is widely used to measure strength endurance abilities in athletes (Alfőldi et al., 2021), were analyzed. The following variables were measured during the rowing ergometer test: maximum, average, and minimum heart rate (HRmax, avg, min), total distance covered within 12 min, total power generated during the test [W], average time to 500 m, the calorie burn rate [kcal] per hour, strokes per minute (SPM) [s/m]. Each participant wore a Polar H10 heart rate sensor (Polar Electro Oy, Kempele, Finland) on a chest strap. The ergometer was programmed and paired with the ErgData application and the HR sensor. The test was initiated upon a verbal start cue. The system was automatically activated when the handle was engaged and automatically deactivated after 12 min. The data were logged into the app. The data from the ErgData app were recorded in an Excel spreadsheet.

Statistical Analysis

Minimum, maximum, and average values and standard deviations were determined in a statistical analysis. Percentile ranks were calculated for the results reached by every participant. The standards for evaluating strength endurance abilities were expressed as T-score values and presented on a five-point grading scale (very poor, poor, average, good, very good). Sexual dimorphism in the control sample was analyzed using the Student's t-test for independent samples (the Shapiro-Wilk test revealed that all analyzed variables followed a normal distribution). The obtained results were used to classify the participants' fitness levels. These data can be also used to monitor changes in the strength endurance abilities of a population.

Results

On average, men covered a distance of 2535.6 m and women covered a distance of 1581.0m during the 12-MCTRE (Table 1). The BMI of both female and male participants was within the norm (23.3 and 22.1 kg/m2, respectively). The results reached by men and women are presented on a five-point grading scale (with a tolerance range for each score) in Table 2.

Table 1.

Descriptive statistics of the studied population.

Characteristics Males (N = 1855) Females (N = 2879)
Mean SD min-max Mean SD min-max
Age [years] 19.98 1.04 19–25 19.58 0.75 19–24
Body height [cm] 181.12 6.08 160.2–202.2 165.06 6.47 139.8–195.0
Body mass [kg] 76.57 9.94 55.2–120.6 59.11 7.79 40.0–101.3
BMI [kg/m2] 23.34 2.79 16.22–6.33 21.76 3.16 15.02–38.22
Distance covered [m] 2535.57 311.01 1445–2999 1580.96 230.03 489–2166
Open in a new tab

Table 2.

Five-point grading scale for evaluating female and male participants.

Level Tolerance range N
Meters Points
Males
Very poor 1445–2224 1÷20 371
Poor 2225–2554 21÷40 371
Average 2555–2682 41÷60 379
Good 2683–2784 61÷80 376
Very good 2785–2999 81÷100 367
Females
Very poor 489–1372 1÷20 577
Poor 1373–1603 21÷40 580
Average 1604–1684 41÷60 588
Good 1685–1761 61÷80 566
Very good 1762–2166 81÷100 568
Open in a new tab

results of the control group (Table 3) indicate that men covered a significantly (p < 0.001) longer distance (2691.5 m) than women (2116.1 m) during the 12-MCTRE. The values of the remaining variables, including power, energy expenditure, pace/500 m (lower values are better), and HRmax were also significantly (p < 0.05) better in men, excluding S/M and HRavg, where significant differences were not observed between the sexes (Table 3).

Table 3.

Descriptive statistics for the 12-MCTRE.

Parameter Males Females Difference
Mean SD Min. Max. Mean SD Min. Max. t p
Distance [m] 2691.50 235.053 2060 3067 2116.13 182.05 1775 2557 10.67 <0.001
Power [Watts] 149.82 35.54 79 216 71.34 17.40 42 125 11.08 <0.001
Energy expenditure [Kcal] 161.00 24.98 105 207 107.59 12.75 88 146 10.62 <0.001
Strokes per minute (S/M) 28.54 3.67 20 38 26.88 3.50 20 33 1.79 ns
Pace/500m [s] 133.18 14.02 104 174 168.47 17.42 105 202 −8.56 <0.001
HR avg [bpm] 175.04 12.65 139 197 169.66 12.88 121 193 1.62 ns
HR max [bpm] 194.07 10.49 167 219 186.84 10.87 144 205 2.61 0.011
Open in a new tab

Training intensity distribution in male and female participants is presented in Table 4. During the 12-MCTRE, both women and men remained in the very high effort zone for the longest period of time (516.9 s and 363.1 s, respectively), compared with the remaining zones. Men spent least time in the very low effort zone (1.9 s), whereas women spent least time in the maximal effort zone (0.9 s). Women remained significantly longer (p < 0.001) in the high effort zone than men (99.7 s vs. 243.5 s, difference of 143.8 s), but significantly shorter in the maximal effort zone (difference of 9.2 s) and the very high-effort zone (difference of 153.8 s). In the remaining effort zones, the differences between the sexes were not significant.

Table 4.

Training intensity distribution during the 12-MCTRE.

Intensity zones [bpm] Males Females Difference
Mean SD Min. Max. Mean SD Min. Max. t p
Maximal: > 190 s 10.1 17.2 0 62 0.9 2.2 0 12 2.97 0.004
% 1.4 2.4 0 8.6 0.1 0.3 0 1.7
Very high: 173–190 s 516.9 204.6 0 702 363.1 261.7 0 697 2.51 0.015
% 71.8 28.4 0 97.5 50.4 36.3 0 96.8
High: 153–172 s 99.7 106.1 5 423 243.5 211.1 0 603 −3.26 0.002
% 13.9 14.7 1 58.7 33.8 29.3 0 83.8
Moderate: 134–152 s 65.6 120.2 0 514 71.6 83.8 0 355 −0.23 ns
% 9.1 16.7 0 71.4 9.9 11.6 0 49.3
Low: 115–133 s 25.6 84.2 0 449 29.3 78.1 0 403 −0.18 ns
% 3.6 11.7 0 62.4 4.1 10.8 0 55.9
Very low: 104–114 s 1.9 7.7 0 40 11.6 53.7 0 303 −0.94 ns
% 0.3 1.1 0 5.6 1.6 7.5 0 42.1
Open in a new tab

Discussion

The 12-MCTRE administered in the present study was modeled on the Cooper's 12-min run test (CRT). Research has shown that the original CRT is a valid and reliable motor test for measuring aerobic (cardiorespiratory) fitness (Bandyopadhyay, 2015; Penry et al., 2011). In turn, rowing has been described as a cyclic sport that typically consists of both strength and endurance sessions (Alfoldi et al., 2021). Hybrid exercise training is characteristic of rowing regattas over a standardized distance of 2 km, where each race lasts 5.5 to 7 min (Mikulić, 2008). In rowing competitions, relative anaerobic contribution ranges from 21 to 30% (Secher, 1993), whereas the aerobic metabolism contributes 75–80% of the energy demand (Juriśić et al., 2014). In the 12-MCTRE, the duration of effort is approximately twice longer, which indicates that endurance abilities play a more important role than strength abilities relative to a 2-km rowing distance in regattas. Therefore, the endurance component in strength endurance abilities is dominant in the 12-MCTRE. The present study fills in the knowledge gap concerning the Cooper test, and it indicates that the 12-MCTRE is a useful tool for assessing strength endurance abilities in young adults.

The 12-MCTRE can be successfully implemented in functional training programs, in particular in aerobic training. The health benefits associated with aerobic and strength training were described in the Introduction. This section focuses on improvements in health that are directly associated with training on a Concept 2 rowing ergometer. The ergometer features a sliding seat which reduces the load on the lower limbs during exercise. In the Concept 2 rowing ergometer, the load can be additionally controlled by adjusting resistance on a 10-point scale. This option can be used by persons with excessive weight or persons with decreased functional mobility of the lower limbs to make rowing more of a strength or an endurance workout. Research has demonstrated that around 75–80% of the power produced by successful elite rowers during sliding-seat rowing is generated by the lower limbs, whereas 20–25% is generated by the torso and the arms (Cosgrove et al., 1999). Therefore, the grading scale proposed in this study can be used to assess endurance and strength abilities in both healthy subjects and persons who cannot be submitted to run tests.

An assessment of sexual dimorphism in the 12-MCTRE revealed that men significantly (p < 0.001) outperformed women in terms of physiological characteristics (distance covered, power, energy expenditure). Previous research has shown that men perform better than women in rowing competitions (Keenan et al., 2018; Podstawski et al., 2022), although sexual dimorphism in rowing has been rarely examined in the literature. The present study also confirmed that men achieved higher maximal and submaximal effort levels than women (Hunter and Stevens, 2013; Tanaka and Seals, 2008).

Due to the discussed advantages of a rowing ergometer, further research is needed to determine the extent to which this equipment can be used in functional training to improve motor abilities of professional athletes in various sports disciplines, as well as individuals who exercise to derive health benefits. Limb injuries sustained by athletes and sedentary individuals often require physiotherapy in positions that stabilize the affected joints. A rowing ergometer is an excellent piece of equipment that can be used in physiotherapy to stabilize knee, ankle, and hip joints.

In line with standard training practice, resistance training should be performed on different days than aerobic training, usually on two or three non-consecutive days of the week. According to experts, resistance training exercises targeting the major muscle groups should be repeated 8–12 times with a one-repetition maximum (1RM) of 40–80%, depending on the person's training level. To enable recovery, a rest interval of 2–3 min is recommended between the exercises (Garber et al., 2011). Based on the standard guidelines for aerobic training, 150 min of moderate-intensity exercise (46–63% of maximal oxygen uptake, VO2max) (30–60 min per session) and/or 75 minutes of vigorous-intensity exercise (64–90% of VO2max) (20–60 min per session) are recommended per week (Garber et al., 2011). According to Klika and Jordan (2013), traditional protocols may be effective, but they are not realistic in adults. The above applies also to young adults, including university students who lack time for exercise (Carballo-Fazanes et al., 2020). For an average person, these protocols may be unattractive and difficult to implement because the standard recommendations for strength and endurance training require considerable time and involve certain logistic constraints. Therefore, from the point of view of health promotion, holistic training, including workouts that promote strength endurance abilities, are more likely to attract the interest of young adults and can be used to evaluate and improve their motor fitness and increase their physical activity levels.

Conclusions

The 12-MCTRE is an effective tool for evaluating strength endurance abilities in young adults. Testing standards should be regularly revised and updated to guarantee and maintain maximum reliability. The results of this study suggest that after the development of the classification standards for the 12-MCTRE, the test can be deployed to determine the strength endurance abilities of individuals from different countries.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank all university students (women and men) who volunteered for the study.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: R.P.; methodology: R.P.; software: K.B. and R.P.; validation: K.B. and R.P.; formal analysis: K.B.; investigation: R.P. and F.I.; resources: R.P.; data curation: R.P.; writing—original draft preparation: R.P., K.B. and P.G.; writing—review & editing: R.P., P.G. and K.B.; visualization: K.B.; supervision: R.P.; project administration: R.P.; funding acquisition: R.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding Information

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was conducted following the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn (decision No. 39/2011; approval date: 24 November 2011).

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all participants included in the study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Alfőldi, Z., Borysławski, K., Ihasz, F., Soós, I., and Podstawski, R. (2021). Differences in the Anthropometric and Physiological Profiles of Hungarian Male Rowers of Various Age Categories, Rankings and Career Lengths: Selection Problems. Frontiers in Physiology, 12, 747781. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2021.747781. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. American College of Sports Medicine . (1998). Position Stand: the recommended quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory and muscular fitness, and flexibility in healthy adults. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 30(6), 975–991. DOI: 10.1097/00005768-199806000-00032 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bandyopadhyay, A. (2015). Validity of Cooper's 12-minute run test for estimation of maximum oxygen uptake in male university students. Biology of Sport, 32(1), 59–63. DOI: 10.5604/20831862.1127283 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bårdstu, H. B., Andersen, V, Fimland, M. S., Raastad, T., and Saeterbakken, A. H. (2022). Muscle strength is associated with physical functioning community-dwelling older adults receiving home care. A cross-sectional study. Frontiers in Public Health, 10, 856632. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.856632 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Barlow, C. E., LaMonte, M. J., Fitzgerald, S. J., Kampert, J. B., Perrin, J. L., and Blair, S. N. (2006). Cardiorespiratory fitness is an independent predictor of hypertension incidence among initially normotensive healthy women. American Journal of Epidemiology, 163(2), 142–150. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwj019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Booth, F. W., Gordon, S. E., Carlson, C. J., and Hamilton, M. T. (2000). Waging war on modern chronic diseases: primary prevention through exercise biology. Journal of Applied Physiology, 88(2), 774–787. DOI: 10.1152/jappl.2000.88.2.774 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Carballo-Fazanes, A., Rico-Díaz, J., Barcala-Furelos, R., Rey, E., Rodríguez-Fernández, J. E., Varela-Casal, C., and Abelairas-Gómez, C. (2020). Physical activity habits and determinants, sedentary behaviour and lifestyle in university students. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(9), 3272. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17093272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cherouveim, E. D., Methenitis, S. K., Simeonidis, T., Georginis, P., Tsekouras, Y. E., Biskitzi, C., Tsolakis, C., & Koulouvaris, P. (2022). Validity and Reliability of New Equations for the Prediction of Maximal Oxygen Uptake in Male and Female Elite Adolescent Rowers. Journal of Human Kinetics, 83, 77–86. 10.2478/hukin-2022-0053 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Church, T. S., La Monte, M. J., Barlow, C. E., and Blair, S. N. (2005). Cardiorespiratory fitness and body mass index as predictors of cardiovascular disease mortality among men with diabetes. Archives of Internal Medicine, 165(18), 114–120. DOI: 10.1001/archinte.165.18.2114 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Clael, S., and Bezerra, L. (2019). Strength and physical functions in people with Parkinson's disease. Future Neurology, 14, 4. DOI: 10.2217/fnl-2019-0009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Cosgrove, M. J., Wilson, J., Watt, D., and Grant, S. F. (1999).The relationship between selected physiological variables of rowers and rowing performance as determined by a 2000 m ergometer test. Journal of Sports Sciences, 17, 845–852. DOI: 10.1080/026404199365407 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Fitz Gerald, S. J. B. C., Kampert, J. B., Morrow, J. R. Jr., Jackson, A.W., Blair, S. N. (2004). Muscular fitness and all-cause mortality: a prospective study. Journal of Physical Activity & Health, 1, 7–18. [Google Scholar]
  13. Fradkin, A. J., Zazryn, T. R., and Smoliga, J. M. (2010). Effects of warming-up on physical performance: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 24(1), 140–148. DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181c643a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Gale, C. R., Martyn, C. N., Cooper, C., and Sayer, A. A. (2007). Grip strength, body composition, and mortality. International Journal of Epidemiology, 36(1), 228–235. DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyl224 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Gallanagh, S., Quinn, T. J., Alexander, J., and Walters, M. R. (2011). Physical activity in the prevention and treatment of stroke. ISRN Neurology, 2011, 953818. DOI: 10.5402/2011/953818 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Garber, C. E., Blissmer, B., Deschenes, M. R., Franklin, B. A., Lamonte, M. J., Lee, I. M., Nieman, D. C., and Swain, D. P. (2011). American College of Sports Medicine. American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory, musculoskeletal, and neuromotor fitness in apparently healthy adults: guidance for prescribing exercise. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 43(7), 1334–1359. DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e318213fefb [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Gregg, E. W., Cauley, J.A., Stone, K., Thompson, T. J., Bauer, D. C., Cummings, S. R., Ensrud, K. E., and Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group . (2003). Relationship of changes in physical activity and mortality among older women. Journal of American Medical Association, 289, 2379–2386. DOI: 10.1001/jama.289.18.2379 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Haskell, W. L., Lee, J. M., Pate, R. R., Powell, K. E., Blair, S. N., Franklin, B, A., Macera, C.A., Heath, G. W., Thompson, P.D., and Bauman, A. (2007). Physical Activity and public health: updated recommendation for adult from the American College of Sports Medicine and American Association. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 39(8), 1423–3144. DOI: 10.1249/mss.0b013e3180616b27 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hunter, S. K., and Stevens, A. A. (2013). Sex differences in marathon running with advanced age: Physiology or participation? Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 45, 148–156. DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31826900f6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Jurišić, D., Donadić, Z., M., and Lozovina, M. (2014). Relation between maximum oxygen uptake and anaerobic threshold, and the rowing ergometer results in senior rowers. Acta Kinesiologica, 8, 55–61. [Google Scholar]
  21. Keenan, K. G., Senefeld, J. W., & Hunter, S. K. (2018). Girls in boat: Sex differences in rowing performance and participation. PLoS ONE, 13, e0191504. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191504 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kherada, O., and Carneirob A. V., On behalf of choosing wisely working group of the European Federation of Internal Medicine . (2023). General health check-ups: To check or not to check? A question of choosing wisely. European Journal of Internal Medicine, 109, 1–3. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejim.2022.12.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Klika, B., and Jordan Ch. (2013). High intensity circuit training using body weight: Maximum result with minimal investment. ACM’s Health & Fitness Journal, 17(3), 8–13. DOI: 10.1249/FIT.0b013e31828cb1e8 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  24. Mandolesi, L., Polverino, A., Montuori, S., Foti, F., Ferraioli, G., Sorrentino, P., and Sorrentino, G. (2018). Effects of physical exercise on cognitive functioning and wellbeing: Biological and psychological benefits. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 509. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. McTiernan A., Friedenreich C. M., Katzmarzyk P. T., Powell, K. E., Macko, R., Buchner, D., Pescatello, L. S., Bloodgood, B., Tennant, B., Vaux-Bjerke, A., George, S. M., and Troiano, R. P., and Piercy, K. L. Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee. (2019). Physical activity in cancer prevention and survival: A systematic review. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 51(6), 1252–1261. DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001937 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Mikulić, P. (2008). Anthropometric and physiological profiles of rowers of varying ages and ranks. Kinesiology, 40(1), 80–88. UDC: 797.123:572.087:576.8.095. [Google Scholar]
  27. Norton, K., Norton, L., and Sadgrove, D. (2010). Position statement on physical activity and exercise intensity terminology. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 13, 496–502. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsams.2009.09.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Olszewska, A., Jackowiak, A., Chwałszczyńska, A., and Sobiech, K. A. (2017). Physical activity as the main factor affecting body composition of the visually impaired. Physiotherapy Quarterly, 25(1), 23–28. Doi: 10.1515/physio-2017-0002 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  29. Penry, J. T., Wilcox, A. R., and Yun, J. (2011). Validity and Reliability Analysis of Cooper's 12-Minute Run and the Multistage Shuttle Run in Healthy Adults. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 25(3), 597–605, DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181cc2423 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Podstawski R., Finn, K. J., Borysławski, K., Omelan, A. A., Podstawska, A. M., Skrzypczak, A. R., and Pomianowski A. (2022). The influence of COVID-19 on university students’ well-being, physical activity, body composition, and strength endurance. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(23), 15680. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192315680 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Podstawski, R., and Żurek, P. (2022). Long-term trends in the somatic and motor characteristics of female students at the University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Poland (2000–2018). American Journal of Human Biology : The Official Journal of the Human Biology Council, 34(2), e23600. 10.1002/ajhb.23600 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Podstawski, R., Borysławski, K., Katona, Z. B., Alföldi, Z., Boraczyński, M., Jaszczur-Nowicki, J., and Gronek, P. (2022). Sex differences in anthropometric and physiological profiles of Hungarian rowers of different ages. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(13), 8115. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19138115 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Podstawski, R., Markowski, P., Clark. C. C. T., Choszcz. D., Ihász, F., Stojiljković, S., and Gronek, P. (2019). International standards for the 3-Minute Burpee Test: high-intensity motor performance. Journal of Human Kinetics, 69, 137–147. DOI: 10.2478/hukin-2019-0021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Podstawski, R., Konkanen, A., Boraczyński, T., Boraczyński, M., Mańkowski, S., and Choszcz, D. (2015). Physical fitness classification standards for Polish early education teachers. South African Journal for Research in Sport, Physical Education and Recreation, 37(1), 113–130. [Google Scholar]
  35. Secher, N. (1993). Physiological and biomechanical aspects of rowing. Sports Medicine, 15, 24–42. DOI: 10.2165/00007256-199315010-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Tanaka, H., and Seals, D. R. (2008). Endurance exercise performance in Masters athletes: Age-associated changes and underlying physiological mechanisms. Journal of Physiology, 586, 55–63. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2007.141879 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Thompson, P. D., Buchner, D., Pina, I. L., Balady, G. J., Williams, M. A., Marcus, B. H., … and Metabolism Subcommittee on Physical Activity . (2003). Exercise and physical activity in the prevention and treatment of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: a statement from the Council on Clinical Cardiology(Subcommittee on Exercise, Rehabilitation, and Prevention) and the Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism (Subcommittee on Physical Activity). Circulation, 107(24), 3109–3116. DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000075572.40158.77 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Uysal, H. Ş., Ojeda-Aravena, A., Ulaş, M., Martín, E. B., & Ramirez-Campillo, R. (2023). Validity, Reliability, and Sensitivity of Mobile Applications to Assess Change of Direction Speed. Journal of Human Kinetics, 87, 217–228. 10.5114/jhk/167465 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Weiss, E. P., and Holloszy, J. O. (2007). Improvements in body composition, glucose tolerance, and insulin action induced by increasing energy expenditure or decreasing energy intake. Journal of Nutrition, 137(4), 1087–1090. DOI: 10.1093/jn/137.4.1087 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Human Kinetics are provided here courtesy of Academy of Physical Education in Katowice, Poland

RESOURCES