Skip to main content
Biophysical Journal logoLink to Biophysical Journal
. 1999 Jun;76(6):2943–2950. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(99)77449-7

Calculation of protein form birefringence using the finite element method.

Z Pantic-Tanner 1, D Eden 1
PMCID: PMC1300266  PMID: 10354422

Abstract

An approach based on the finite element method (FEM) is employed to calculate the optical properties of macromolecules, specifically form birefringence. Macromolecules are treated as arbitrarily shaped particles suspended in a solvent of refraction index n1. The form birefringence of the solution is calculated as the difference in its refractive index when all the particles of refractive index n2 are either parallel to or normal to the direction of the polarization of light. Since the particles of interest are small compared to the wavelength of light, a quasi-static approximation for the refractive index is used, i.e., that it is equal to the square root of the dielectric constant of the suspension. The average dielectric constant of the mixture is calculated using the finite element method. This approach has been tested for ellipsoidal particles and a good agreement with theoretical results has been obtained. Also, numerical results for the motor domains of ncd and kinesin, small arbitrarily shaped proteins with known x-ray structures, show reasonable agreement with the experimental data obtained from transient electric birefringence experiments.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (105.9 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Antosiewicz J., Porschke D. An unusual electrooptical effect observed for DNA fragments and its apparent relation to a permanent electric moment associated with bent DNA. Biophys Chem. 1989 Mar;33(1):19–30. doi: 10.1016/0301-4622(89)80003-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cassim J. Y., Taylor E. W. Intrinsic birefringence of poly-gamma-benzyl-L-glutamate, a helical polypeptide, and the theory of birefringence. Biophys J. 1965 Jul;5(4):531–552. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(65)86733-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cassim J. Y., Tobias P. S., Taylor E. W. Birefringence of muscle proteins and the problem of structural birefringence. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1968 Dec 3;168(3):463–471. doi: 10.1016/0005-2795(68)90180-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Eden D., Luu B. Q., Zapata D. J., Sablin E. P., Kull F. J. Solution structure of two molecular motor domains: nonclaret disjunctional and kinesin. Biophys J. 1995 Apr;68(4 Suppl):59S–65S. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kull F. J., Sablin E. P., Lau R., Fletterick R. J., Vale R. D. Crystal structure of the kinesin motor domain reveals a structural similarity to myosin. Nature. 1996 Apr 11;380(6574):550–555. doi: 10.1038/380550a0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Oldenbourg R., Ruiz T. Birefringence of macromolecules. Wiener's theory revisited, with applications to DNA and tobacco mosaic virus. Biophys J. 1989 Jul;56(1):195–205. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(89)82664-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Sablin E. P., Kull F. J., Cooke R., Vale R. D., Fletterick R. J. Crystal structure of the motor domain of the kinesin-related motor ncd. Nature. 1996 Apr 11;380(6574):555–559. doi: 10.1038/380555a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. TAYLOR E. W., CRAMER W. Birefringence of protein solutions and biological systems. II. Studies on TMV, tropocollagen, and paramyosin. Biophys J. 1963 Mar;3:143–154. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3495(63)86810-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biophysical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biophysical Society

RESOURCES