Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Accident & Emergency Medicine logoLink to Journal of Accident & Emergency Medicine
. 1999 Sep;16(5):325–330. doi: 10.1136/emj.16.5.325

Thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction: the safety and efficiency of treatment in the accident and emergency department.

J A Edhouse 1, M Sakr 1, J Wardrope 1, F P Morris 1
PMCID: PMC1347049  PMID: 10505910

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the safety and efficiency with which the accident and emergency (A&E) department provides thrombolytic treatment for patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). METHODS: A prospective observational study based in a teaching hospital for one year. All patients who presented with the clinical and electrocardiographic indications for thrombolytic treatment were studied. Patients were grouped according to route of admission. After logarithmic transformation, the "door to needle times" of the groups were compared using a two tailed Student's t test. Arrhythmias and complications after thrombolytic treatment were noted. The appropriateness of the treatment was assessed retrospectively by review of the clinical records and electrocardiograms, judged against locally agreed eligibility criteria. RESULTS: Data from 153 patients were analysed; 138/153 (90%) patients were admitted via the A&E department. The shortest door to needle times were seen in those patients thrombolysed by A&E staff within the A&E department (mean 43.8 minutes). The transfer of A&E patients to the coronary care unit (CCU) was associated with a significant increase in the door to needle time (mean 58.8 minutes, p = 0.004). Only one malignant arrhythmia occurred during the administration of thrombolysis in the A&E department, and this was managed effectively. No arrhythmias occurred during transfer of thrombolysed patients to the CCU. In every case, the decision to administer thrombolysis was retrospectively judged to have been appropriate. CONCLUSIONS: The A&E department provides appropriate, safe, and timely thrombolytic treatment for patients with AMI. Transferring A&E patients to the CCU before thrombolysis is associated with an unnecessary treatment delay.

Full text

PDF
323

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. An ideal worth fighting for. Lancet. 1998 Jul 4;352(9121):1–1. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Baigent C., Collins R., Appleby P., Parish S., Sleight P., Peto R. ISIS-2: 10 year survival among patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction in randomised comparison of intravenous streptokinase, oral aspirin, both, or neither. The ISIS-2 (Second International Study of Infarct Survival) Collaborative Group. BMJ. 1998 May 2;316(7141):1337–1343. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7141.1337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Birkhead J. S. Time delays in provision of thrombolytic treatment in six district hospitals. Joint Audit Committee of the British Cardiac Society and a Cardiology Committee of Royal College of Physicians of London. BMJ. 1992 Aug 22;305(6851):445–448. doi: 10.1136/bmj.305.6851.445. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Dudley M., Channer K. S. Assessment of the value of technician reporting of electrocardiographs in an accident and emergency department. J Accid Emerg Med. 1997 Sep;14(5):307–310. doi: 10.1136/emj.14.5.307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Eisenberg M. S. Reducing the door-to-drug interval for thrombolytic therapy. Acad Emerg Med. 1995 Jul;2(7):579–580. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1995.tb03592.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Emerson P. A., Russell N. J., Wyatt J., Crichton N., Pantin C. F., Morgan A. D., Fleming P. R. An audit of doctor's management of patients with chest pain in the accident and emergency department. Q J Med. 1989 Mar;70(263):213–220. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gjørup T., Kelbaek H., Nielsen D., Kreiner S., Godtfredsen J. Interpretation of the electrocardiogram in suspected myocardial infarction: a randomized controlled study of the effect of a training programme to reduce interobserver variation. J Intern Med. 1992 Apr;231(4):407–412. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.1992.tb00952.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gonzalez E. R., Jones L. A., Ornato J. P., Bleecker G. C., Strauss M. J. Hospital delays and problems with thrombolytic administration in patients receiving thrombolytic therapy: a multicenter prospective assessment. Virginia Thrombolytic Study Group. Ann Emerg Med. 1992 Oct;21(10):1215–1221. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(05)81749-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hood S., Birnie D., Swan L., Hillis W. S. Questionnaire survey of thrombolytic treatment in accident and emergency departments in the United Kingdom. BMJ. 1998 Jan 24;316(7127):274–274. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7127.274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. McCallion W. A., Templeton P. A., McKinney L. A., Higginson J. D. Missed myocardial ischaemia in the accident & emergency department: E.C.G. a need for audit? Arch Emerg Med. 1991 Jun;8(2):102–107. doi: 10.1136/emj.8.2.102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. More R., Moore K., Quinn E., Perez Avila C., Davidson C., Vincent R., Chamberlain D. Delay times in the administration of thrombolytic therapy: the Brighton experience. Int J Cardiol. 1995 Aug;49 (Suppl):S39–S46. doi: 10.1016/0167-5273(95)02338-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Morrison W. G., Swann I. J. Electrocardiograph interpretation by junior doctors. Arch Emerg Med. 1990 Jun;7(2):108–110. doi: 10.1136/emj.7.2.108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Nee P. A., Gray A. J., Martin M. A. Audit of thrombolysis initiated in an accident and emergency department. Qual Health Care. 1994 Mar;3(1):29–33. doi: 10.1136/qshc.3.1.29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Pell A. C., Miller H. C., Robertson C. E., Fox K. A. Effect of "fast track" admission for acute myocardial infarction on delay to thrombolysis. BMJ. 1992 Jan 11;304(6819):83–87. doi: 10.1136/bmj.304.6819.83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Porter G., Doughty R., Gamble G., Sharpe N. Thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction: reducing in hospital treatment delay. N Z Med J. 1995 Jun 28;108(1002):253–254. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Rawles J. Magnitude of benefit from earlier thrombolytic treatment in acute myocardial infarction: new evidence from Grampian region early anistreplase trial (GREAT) BMJ. 1996 Jan 27;312(7025):212–215. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7025.212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Snoey E. R., Housset B., Guyon P., ElHaddad S., Valty J., Hericord P. Analysis of emergency department interpretation of electrocardiograms. J Accid Emerg Med. 1994 Sep;11(3):149–153. doi: 10.1136/emj.11.3.149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Westdrop E. J., Gratton M. C., Watson W. A. Emergency department interpretation of electrocardiograms. Ann Emerg Med. 1992 May;21(5):541–544. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(05)82521-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Weston C. F., Penny W. J., Julian D. G. Guidelines for the early management of patients with myocardial infarction. British Heart Foundation Working Group. BMJ. 1994 Mar 19;308(6931):767–771. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6931.767. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. White T., Woodmansey P., Ferguson D. G., Channer K. S. Improving the interpretation of electrocardiographs in an accident and emergency department. Postgrad Med J. 1995 Mar;71(833):132–135. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.71.833.132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Wilcox R. G., von der Lippe G., Olsson C. G., Jensen G., Skene A. M., Hampton J. R. Trial of tissue plasminogen activator for mortality reduction in acute myocardial infarction. Anglo-Scandinavian Study of Early Thrombolysis (ASSET). Lancet. 1988 Sep 3;2(8610):525–530. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(88)92656-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Accident & Emergency Medicine are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES