Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health logoLink to Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
. 2000 Jan;54(1):10–16. doi: 10.1136/jech.54.1.10

Women in hospital medicine in the United Kingdom: glass ceiling, preference, prejudice or cohort effect?

I McManus 1, K Sproston 1
PMCID: PMC1731544  PMID: 10692956

Abstract

OBJECTIVE—To assess from official statistics whether there is evidence that the careers of women doctors in hospitals do not progress in the same way as those of men.
DESIGN—The proportions of female hospital doctors overall (1963-96), and in the specialties of medicine, surgery, obstetrics and gynaecology, pathology, radiology/radiotherapy, anaesthetics and psychiatry (1974-1996) were examined. Additionally data were examined on career preferences and intentions from pre-registration house officers, final year medical students, and medical school applicants (1966-1991).
ANALYSIS—Data were analysed according to cohort of entry to medical school to assess the extent of disproportionate promotion.
RESULTS—The proportion of women in hospital career posts was largely explained by the rapidly increasing proportion of women entering medical school during the past three decades. In general there was little evidence for disproportionate promotion of women in hospital careers, although in surgery, hospital medicine and obstetrics and gynaecology, fewer women seemed to progress beyond the SHO grade, and in anaesthetics there were deficits of women at each career stage. Analyses of career preferences and intentions suggest that disproportionate promotion cannot readily be explained as differential choice by women.
CONCLUSIONS—Although there is no evidence as such of a "glass ceiling" for women doctors in hospital careers, and the current paucity of women consultants primarily reflects historical trends in the numbers of women entering medical school, there is evidence in some cases of disproportionate promotion that is best interpreted as direct or indirect discrimination.



Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (137.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Allen P. Medical and dental staffing prospects in the NHS in England and Wales 1991. Health Trends. 1993;25(1):4–12. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Allen P. Medical and dental staffing prospects in the NHS in England and Wales 1992. Health Trends. 1993;25(4):118–126. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Baldwin D. C., Jr, Daugherty S. R., Eckenfels E. J. Student perceptions of mistreatment and harassment during medical school. A survey of ten United States schools. West J Med. 1991 Aug;155(2):140–145. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bewley B. R., Bewley T. H. Hospital doctors' career structure and misuse of medical womanpower. Lancet. 1975 Aug 9;2(7928):270–272. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(75)90976-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bickel J. Women in medical education. A status report. N Engl J Med. 1988 Dec 15;319(24):1579–1584. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198812153192405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Currie C. Role models and patronage. BMJ. 1993 Mar 20;306(6880):735–736. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6880.735. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Edwards C., Lambert T. W., Goldacre M. J., Parkhouse J. Early medical career choices and eventual careers. Med Educ. 1997 Jul;31(4):237–242. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1997.tb02919.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Etzkowitz H., Kemelgor C., Neuschatz M., Uzzi B., Alonzo J. The paradox of critical mass for women in science. Science. 1994 Oct 7;266(5182):51–54. doi: 10.1126/science.7939644. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Firth-Cozens J. The five years after qualification. BMJ. 1994 Dec 10;309(6968):1524–1525. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6968.1524. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kvaerner K. J., Aasland O. G., Botten G. S. Female medical leadership: cross sectional study. BMJ. 1999 Jan 9;318(7176):91–94. doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7176.91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lambert T. W., Goldacre M. J., Edwards C., Parkhouse J. Career preferences of doctors who qualified in the United Kingdom in 1993 compared with those of doctors qualifying in 1974, 1977, 1980, and 1983. BMJ. 1996 Jul 6;313(7048):19–24. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7048.19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Lambert T. W., Goldacre M. J., Parkhouse J. Intentions of newly qualified doctors to practise in the United Kingdom. BMJ. 1997 May 31;314(7094):1591–1592. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7094.1591. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Last J. M., Stanley G. R. Career preference of young British doctors. Br J Med Educ. 1968 Jun;2(2):137–155. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1968.tb01758.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Lefford F. Women doctors: a quarter-century track record. Lancet. 1987 May 30;1(8544):1254–1256. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(87)92697-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lenhart S. A., Klein F., Falcao P., Phelan E., Smith K. Gender bias against and sexual harassment of AMWA members in Massachusetts. J Am Med Womens Assoc. 1991 Jul-Aug;46(4):121–125. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. McGoldrick K. E. Shattering medicine's glass ceiling. J Am Med Womens Assoc. 1994 Jan-Feb;49(1):3–3. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. McManus I. C., Richards P. Audit of admission to medical school: I--Acceptances and rejects. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1984 Nov 3;289(6453):1201–1204. doi: 10.1136/bmj.289.6453.1201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. McManus I. C., Richards P., Maitlis S. L. Prospective study of the disadvantage of people from ethnic minority groups applying to medical schools in the United Kingdom. BMJ. 1989 Mar 18;298(6675):723–726. doi: 10.1136/bmj.298.6675.723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. McManus I. C., Richards P., Winder B. C., Sproston K. A., Styles V. Medical school applicants from ethnic minority groups: identifying if and when they are disadvantaged. BMJ. 1995 Feb 25;310(6978):496–500. doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6978.496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. McManus I. C., Richards P., Winder B. C., Sproston K. A., Vincent C. A. The changing clinical experience of British medical students. Lancet. 1993 Apr 10;341(8850):941–944. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)91225-b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Nickerson K. G., Bennett N. M., Estes D., Shea S. The status of women at one academic medical center. Breaking through the glass ceiling. JAMA. 1990 Oct 10;264(14):1813–1817. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Showalter E. Improving the position of women in medicine. BMJ. 1999 Jan 9;318(7176):71–72. doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7176.71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Tesch B. J., Wood H. M., Helwig A. L., Nattinger A. B. Promotion of women physicians in academic medicine. Glass ceiling or sticky floor? JAMA. 1995 Apr 5;273(13):1022–1025. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Wilson R., Allen P. Medical and dental staffing prospects in the NHS in England and Wales 1993. Health Trends. 1994;26(3):70–79. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Wolf T. M., Randall H. M., von Almen K., Tynes L. L. Perceived mistreatment and attitude change by graduating medical students: a retrospective study. Med Educ. 1991 May;25(3):182–190. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1991.tb00050.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES