Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical attitudes and expectations in the implementation of a neuroradiology picture archiving and communication system (PACS). A 1-page survey of expectations and clinical attitudes toward a neuroradiology mini-PACS was distributed to 49 full-time faculty members in the departments of neurosurgery, neurology, and otorhinolaryngology at an academic center. Interest in viewing soft-copy images was moderate to very high for over 89% of clinicians. All clinicians were comfortable with phone consultations with radiologists while viewing soft-copy images. Clinicians preferred retrieving images from personal computers over workstations and film libraries by 72.9%, 27.1%, and 0%, respectively. However, 38.5% of surgeons felt the need for hard copy in the operating room. Clinicians estimated that in 18.3% of cases, patients took their in-house films to outside institutions for consultations. Clinicians were enthusiastic about implementing PACS. Although acceptance of soft-copy viewing among clinicians is high, some provision for supplying hard-copy images appears to be necessary.
Key Words: picture archiving and communication system, teleradiology, economics, medical
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (867.6 KB).
References
- 1.Reiner BI, Siegel EL, Hooper F, et al. Impact of filmless imaging on the frequency of clinician review of radiology images. J Digit Imaging. 1998;11:149–150. doi: 10.1007/BF03168288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Pomerantz SM, Siegel EL, Protopapas Z, et al. Experience and design recommendations for picture archiving and communication systems in the surgical setting. J Digit Imaging. 1996;9:123–130. doi: 10.1007/BF03168607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Reiner BI, Siegel EL, Hooper F, et al. Picture archiving and communication systems and vascular surgery: Clinical impressions and suggestions for improvement. J Digit Imaging. 1996;9:167–171. doi: 10.1007/BF03168613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Stacul F. Ultrasonography and PACS. Eur J Radiol. 1998;27:196–199. doi: 10.1016/S0720-048X(98)00062-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Bryan S, Weatherburn G, Watkins J, et al. Radiology report times: Impact of picture archiving and communication systems. AJR. 1998;170:1153–1159. doi: 10.2214/ajr.170.5.9574575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kundel HL, Seshadri SB, Langlotz CP, et al. Prospective study of a PACS: Information flow and clinical action in a medical intensive care unit. Radiology. 1996;199:143–149. doi: 10.1148/radiology.199.1.8633138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Carrino JA, Unkel PJ, Miller ID, et al. Large-scale PACS implementation. J Digit Imaging. 1998;11:3–7. doi: 10.1007/BF03168246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]