Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Biochemical Journal logoLink to Biochemical Journal
. 2000 Jun 15;348(Pt 3):557–563.

Atomic force microscopy of gastric mucin and chitosan mucoadhesive systems.

M P Deacon 1, S McGurk 1, C J Roberts 1, P M Williams 1, S J Tendler 1, M C Davies 1, S S Davis 1, S E Harding 1
PMCID: PMC1221097  PMID: 10839986

Abstract

Atomic force microscopy has been utilized to probe, at a molecular level, the interaction between purified pig gastric mucin (PGM) and a mucoadhesive cationic polymer, chitosan (sea cure 210+), with a low degree (approx. 11%) of acetylation. Images were produced detailing the structures of both PGM and chitosan in 0.1 M acetate buffer (pH 4.5), followed by the complex of the two structures in the same buffer. PGM in 0.1 M acetate buffer revealed long linear filamentous structures, consistent with earlier electron microscopy and scanning tunnelling micoscopy studies. The chitosan molecules also adopted a linear conformation in the same buffer, although with a smaller average length and diameter. They appeared to adopt a stiff-coil conformation consistent with earlier hydrodynamic measurements. The complexes formed after mixing PGM and chitosan together revealed large aggregates. In 0.1 M ionic strength buffer they were of the order of 0.7 microm in diameter, consistent with previous electron microscopy studies. The effect of ionic strength of the buffer on the structure of the complex was also studied and, together with molecular hydrodynamic data, demonstrates that the interaction is principally electrostatic in nature.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (362.9 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Allen A., Pain R. H., Robson T. R. Model for the structure of the gastric mucous gel. Nature. 1976 Nov 4;264(5581):88–89. doi: 10.1038/264088a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Binnig G, Quate CF, Gerber C. Atomic force microscope. Phys Rev Lett. 1986 Mar 3;56(9):930–933. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.56.930. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Creeth J. M. Some physical properties of mucins and their molecular origin. Mod Probl Paediatr. 1976 Oct 24;19:34–45. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Errington N., Harding S. E., Vårum K. M., Illum L. Hydrodynamic characterization of chitosans varying in degree of acetylation. Int J Biol Macromol. 1993 Apr;15(2):113–117. doi: 10.1016/0141-8130(93)90008-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Förster H., Lippold B. C. Conception of peroral sustained-release dosage forms: calculation of initial and maintenance dose with consideration of accumulation. Pharm Acta Helv. 1982;57(12):345–349. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gum J. R., Jr Human mucin glycoproteins: varied structures predict diverse properties and specific functions. Biochem Soc Trans. 1995 Nov;23(4):795–799. doi: 10.1042/bst0230795. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Harding S. E., Davis S. S., Deacon M. P., Fiebrig I. Biopolymer mucoadhesives. Biotechnol Genet Eng Rev. 1999;16:41–86. doi: 10.1080/02648725.1999.10647971. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Harding S. E., Rowe A. J., Creeth J. M. Further evidence for a flexible and highly expanded spheroidal model for mucus glycoproteins in solution. Biochem J. 1983 Mar 1;209(3):893–896. doi: 10.1042/bj2090893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Harding S. E. The macrostructure of mucus glycoproteins in solution. Adv Carbohydr Chem Biochem. 1989;47:345–381. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2318(08)60417-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hutton D. A., Pearson J. P., Allen A., Foster S. N. Mucolysis of the colonic mucus barrier by faecal proteinases: inhibition by interacting polyacrylate. Clin Sci (Lond) 1990 Mar;78(3):265–271. doi: 10.1042/cs0780265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Jumel K., Fiebrig I., Harding S. E. Rapid size distribution and purity analysis of gastric mucus glycoproteins by size exclusion chromatography/multi angle laser light scattering. Int J Biol Macromol. 1996 Feb;18(1-2):133–139. doi: 10.1016/0141-8130(95)01071-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. McMaster T. J., Berry M., Corfield A. P., Miles M. J. Atomic force microscopy of the submolecular architecture of hydrated ocular mucins. Biophys J. 1999 Jul;77(1):533–541. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(99)76910-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Nordman H., Davies J. R., Herrmann A., Karlsson N. G., Hansson G. C., Carlstedt I. Mucus glycoproteins from pig gastric mucosa: identification ofdifferent mucin populations from the surface epithelium. Biochem J. 1997 Sep 15;326(Pt 3):903–910. doi: 10.1042/bj3260903. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Rabke C. E., Wenzler L. A., Beebe T. P., Jr Electron spectroscopy and atomic force microscopy studies of DNA adsorption on mica. Scanning Microsc. 1994;8(3):471–480. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Sheehan J. K., Oates K., Carlstedt I. Electron microscopy of cervical, gastric and bronchial mucus glycoproteins. Biochem J. 1986 Oct 1;239(1):147–153. doi: 10.1042/bj2390147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Skaugrud O., Hagen A., Borgersen B., Dornish M. Biomedical and pharmaceutical applications of alginate and chitosan. Biotechnol Genet Eng Rev. 1999;16:23–40. doi: 10.1080/02648725.1999.10647970. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biochemical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biochemical Society

RESOURCES