Abstract
We have previously detected autoantibodies against topoisomerase II α (anti-topo II α) in sera from patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. To determine whether anti-topo II α is also present in systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients with pulmonary involvement, we screened sera from 92 patients and 34 healthy controls. Presence of anti-topo II α was investigated with respect to clinical and serological features, including the frequencies of HLA class I and II alleles. Anti-topo II α was detected in 20/92 (21.7%) patients. No association was found with either anti-topoisomerase I (Scl-70 or anti-topo I) or anti-centromere antibodies. However, anti-topo II α was associated with the presence of pulmonary hypertension (PHT) (as opposed to pulmonary fibrosis), and with a decrease of carbon monoxide diffusing capacity. Anti-topo II α was strongly associated with the presence of the class I antigen HLA-B35. No significant association was found with HLA class II antigens. HLA-B35 also turned out to be associated with the presence of PHT. These results indicate that in SSc patients, the presence of anti-topo II α is associated with PHT, and that the simultaneous presence of HLA-B35 seems to add to the risk of developing PHT.
Keywords: systemic sclerosis, anti-topoisomerase II α, pulmonary hypertension
INTRODUCTION
Systemic sclerosis (SSc), otherwise known as scleroderma, is a systemic autoimmune disease characterized by microvascular damage and cutaneous and visceral fibrosis [1]. A prominent immunological abnormality found in SSc is the presence of serum antinuclear antibodies, which are detectable in the majority of cases [1]. The autoantigens to which these antibodies bind include DNA topoisomerase I (formerly termed Scl-70) [2, 3] centromere/kinetochore [4], RNA polymerase I, II and III [5, 6], heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein [7] and histones [8]. Anti-fibrillarin and anti-Th RNP are also specific for SSc, but are rarely detected [9, 10]. Each distinct SSc-related antinuclear antibody is closely associated with its own unique combination of clinical features, suggesting that the production of these types of antibody may be related to fundamental disease processes [11].
Pulmonary involvement is a common clinical feature of SSc. A high percentage of patients with the diffuse cutaneous form of SSc (dcSSc), and a rather lower percentage of patients with limited cutaneous SSc (lcSSc), develop a pulmonary interstitial lung disease with histological and physiological characteristics similar to those found in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) [12].
In a previous study, we detected autoantibodies against the DNA topoisomerase II α (anti-topo II α) in the sera of about one-third of IPF patients [13]. Although anti-topo II α may be useful for the diagnosis of IPF, its presence did not correlate with indices of disease severity [14]. Anti-topo II α is not confined to IPF, since it has also been detected in rather lower percentages of patients with other pathologies, such as juvenile rheumatoid arthritis [15], insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus [16], and systemic lupus erythematosus [17].
In the present study, we examined the occurrence of anti-topo II α in SSc patients, about 20% of whom turned out to be positive for anti-topo II α. Associations were identified with certain clinical and immunogenetic features, including the presence of pulmonary hypertension (PHT) and the class I antigen HLA-B35.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
Patients
Sera were obtained from 92 Italian SSc patients, all of whom satisfied the preliminary classification criteria of the American College of Rheumatology [18]. Disease duration was calculated from the time of diagnosis of SSc. According to the extent of skin involvement, patients were classified as having lcSSc or dcSSc [19]. Demographic and clinical features of the patients are listed in Table 1. The presence of pulmonary fibrosis was assessed by chest high-resolution computed tomography (CT). Pulmonary function tests were performed on a body plethismograph Jaeger Body Screen while testing for single breath carbon monoxide diffusing capacity (DLco) on a Transfer Screen Jaeger. The results were calculated as percentages of the predicted normal value [20]. Diagnosis of PHT was based on the presence of tricuspid regurgitation, which allowed reliable measurement of pulmonary pressure by continuous wave Doppler [21]: PHT was considered to be present when the systolic pressure gradient across the tricuspid valve increased to ≥ 30 mmHg. Sera were also obtained from 34 healthy donors (28 females and six males, age 40 ± 1·5 years (mean ± s.e.m.)). All patients gave informed consent to participate in the study, which was approved by the institutional Review Board.
Table 1.
Demographic and clinical characteristics of the systemic sclerosis patients
Characteristic | |
---|---|
No. of patients | 92 |
Sex, M:F | 9:83 |
Age (years) at diagnosis, mean ± s.e.m. | 42·9 ± 1·3 |
Disease duration (years), mean ± s.e.m. | 9 ± 0·66 |
Raynaud's phenomenon, duration (years), mean ± s.e.m. | 34·7 ± 1·6 |
Teleangectasias | 82·6% |
Calcinosis | 46·7% |
Distal bone resorption | 39·1% |
Oesophageal involvement | 87·0% |
Intestinal involvement | 39·1% |
Restrictive lung disease | 33·7% |
DLco reduction | 75·0% |
Pulmonary hypertension (PHT) | 27·2% |
Serositis | 59·8% |
Myositis | 8·7% |
Anti-centromere antibodies (ACA) | 27·2% |
Anti-topoisomerase I (Scl-70) antibodies | 50·0% |
Anti-topoisomerase II α antibodies | 21·7% |
DLco, Carbon monoxide diffusing capacity.
Autoantibody analysis
Antibodies to extractable nuclear antigens Scl-70 (anti-topo I) were determined in all sera samples by ELISA kit (Biochem Immunosystems, Bologna, Italy) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Seventy out of the 92 SSc samples were also analysed using counter immunoelectrophoresis, confirming the very good overall agreement previously reported between the two assays [22]. Anti-centromere antibodies (ACA) were tested on HEp-2 cells (Antibodies Inc. Davis, CA), as previously described [23].
Anti-topo II α detection
Anti-topo II α was detected by ELISA, as previously reported [12, 13]. We employed a purified topo II α (Topogen, Columbus, OH) completely free of contamination from topoisomerase II β or topoisomerase I or from other nucleases, as evaluated by specific enzymatic activity assay, fast performance liquid chromatography and SDS–PAGE. The latter showed the presence of a single band at 170 kD. The optimal concentration for the coating of microtitre plates with purified topo II α was evaluated by chess board titrations, as were appropriate dilutions of patient sera and conjugates. ELISA microtitre plates (EIA Microplate; ICN, Costa Mesa, CA) were coated with the purified topoisomerase II adjusted to a concentration of 1·0 μg/ml in 0·05 m sodium carbonate buffer pH 9·6 and incubated at 4°C overnight. Non-adsorbed antigen was removed by washing the plates four times with PBS containing 0·1% (v/v) Tween 20. After blocking with 5% casein in PBS–Tween, human sera were applied, as was a polyclonal antibody (Topogen) against a 16-residue oligopeptide derived from the carboxyl terminal region of human topo II α. The purity of the peptide was 95%, as evaluated by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and mass spectral analysis. As indicated by the manufacturer, the antibody titre was determined by ELISA to be ≥ 1:104 and immunoaffinity gel chromatography; antibody purification steps were carried out to obtain a homogeneously purified IgG. Patient and normal control sera were diluted 1:100 in PBS–Tween–casein and incubated for 2 h at room temperature. The polyclonal antibody was diluted 1:1000. After four washes with PBS–Tween 20, the appropriate horseradish peroxidase-labelled antibodies (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark) were added and incubated for 2 h at room temperature. The bound antibodies were detected by adding 1,2 o-phenylenediamine (Sigma, St Louis, MO) and H2O2 in 100 mm phosphate buffer, pH 6·0. The reaction with the substrate solution was stopped with 2 m H2SO4 and absorbance was measured at a wavelength of 492 nm, using a multichannel photometer (BioRad, Hercules, CA). The cut-off point of the assay (upper limit of the normal range) was determined by the mean + 3 s.d. of the readings obtained from the 34 healthy controls.
HLA typing
HLA typing was performed on 85/92 patients. HLA class I typing was done with a standard complement-dependent microlymphocytotoxicity test and read with a fluorescence microscope [24]. Blood samples were collected in acid-citrate dextrose. Typing was carried out on peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) obtained by density gradient centrifugation on Lymphoprep (Nicomed AS, Oslo, Norway). Selected monospecific or oligospecific antisera were obtained from commercial sources (Bio Test, Dreyeich, Germany; Behering, Marburg, Germany; Fresenius, Bad Homburg, Germany; Merieux, Lyon, France). HLA-DRB, DQA1, DQB1, and DPB1 alleles were typed by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) sequence-specific oligonucleotide probes method, which was carried out using digoxigenin-labelled probes [25]. The primers and oligonucleotide probes were those validated by the 12th International Histocompatibility Workshop.
Statistical analysis
Statistical computations were performed using CSS Statistica-Statistical software (Statsoft Inc., Tulsa, OK). Quantitative parameters were compared by means of the Mann–Whitney U-test for independent groups. Categorical data were analysed by the χ2 test using Yate's correction for continuity, or else, when appropriate, by Fisher's exact test. Odds ratios (OR) were calculated and referred to as relative risk (RR).
RESULTS
Table 1 lists the demographic and clinical features of the 92 SSc patients studied. The dcSSc variety was present in 37/92 (40%) patients. Anti-topo II α was found in 20/92 (21·7%) patients. No reactivity against topo II α was observed in the sera from the 34 healthy donors, which showed binding values under the upper limit of the normal range (mean optical density (OD) value = 0·247, s.d. = 0·092, cut-off value = 0·523).
Table 2 lists the epidemiological and clinical characteristics of the SSc patients with respect to positivity or negativity for anti-topo II α. No association was found with anti-topo I or with ACA. Among the 20 patients who were positive for anti-topo II α, five (25%) were negative for both anti-topo I and ACA. Anti-topo II α was not associated with the dcSSc clinical subset. Disease duration was significantly shorter among patients with anti-topo II α (P = 0·04).
Table 2.
Epidemiological, clinical and functional features of the systemic sclerosis patients grouped with respect to positivity or negativity to anti-topoisomerase II α (anti-topo II α) autoantibodies
Anti-topo II α+ (n = 20) | Anti-topo II α− (n = 72) | P* | |
---|---|---|---|
Age (years) at investigation, mean ± s.e.m. | 50·6 ± 2·8 | 52·4 ± 1·5 | NS |
Disease duration (years), mean ± s.e.m. | 6·2 ± 0·9 | 9·8 ± 0·8 | 0·04 |
Sex, F:M | 19:1 | 64:8 | NS |
dcSSc | 50·0% | 37·5% | NS |
Anti-centromere antibodies (ACA) | 30·0% | 25·0% | NS |
Anti-topo I (Scl-70) antibodies | 45·0% | 51·4% | NS |
Pulmonary hypertension (PHT) | 55·0% | 19·4% | 0·004 |
Restrictive lung disease | 45·0% | 30·6% | NS |
DLco (percent predicted) | 48·6 ± 4·4 | 63·8 ± 2·8 | 0·01 |
dcSSc, Diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis; anti-topo I, anti-topoisomerase I; DLco, carbon monoxide diffusing capacity; NS, not significant.
Significance of the difference between the anti-topo II α–positive (+) and -negative (−) patients as calculated by Mann—Whitney U-test, or χ2 tests with Yate's correction or, when appropriate, Fisher's exact test.
As regards functional features, we observed that patients positive for anti-topo II α showed significantly decreased DLco values (P = 0·01). No association was found with forced vital capacity (FVC), arterial oxygen partial pressure or arterial oxygen saturation (Table 2). Since DLco values decrease both in the presence of restrictive lung disease and in the presence of PHT, we searched for any associations with anti-topo II α. Whereas no association was found among the SSc patients between presence of anti-topo II α and restrictive lung disease, a highly significant association was observed with PHT (11/20, 55%; P = 0·004). However, among the 25 patients who also presented PHT, the values of pulmonary arterial pressure (PAP) did not significantly differ between those subjects who were positive or negative for anti-topo II α (11/25, mean ± s.d. = 53·3 ± 15·1 mmHg versus 14/25, mean ± s.d. = 46·5 ± 13·2 mmHg). We also searched for any possible differences between primary PHT patients and those with PHT secondary to restrictive lung disease. The prevalence of anti-topo II α was 33% (4/12) among primary PHT patients, and 54% (7/13) in those with secondary PHT (P > 0·05). Therefore, a strong association emerged between anti-topo II α and PHT, independently of its specific form (primary or secondary to restrictive lung disease). We also analysed the prevalence of anti-topo II α in the subgroup of SSc patients with restrictive lung disease. Among the 31 patients with restrictive lung disease, positivity for anti-topo II α was found in only 2/18 (11%) patients without PHT, as against 7/13 (54%) with PHT (P = 0·02). This finding confirms that anti-topo II α positivity is associated with presence of PHT, but not with restrictive lung disease.
We looked for an association between anti-topo II α and HLA alleles. The frequencies of HLA-B35 were significantly different among patients positive and negative for anti-topo II α (66·7% versus 23·9%, respectively; OR = 6·4; P < 0·002). The presence of HLA-B35 also turned out to be significantly associated with the risk of developing PHT (RR = 4; P < 0·02). We found that the association of anti-topo II α with HLA-B35 was not merely secondary to that with PHT: anti-topo II α was also significantly associated with PHT in HLA-B35-negative subjects (OR = 7·5; P < 0·05) (Table 3). Nevertheless, the highest risk of developing PHT seemed to derive from an interaction between anti-topo II α and HLA-B35, since the value of the OR of patients who were positive for both anti-topo II α and HLA-B35 was much higher (OR = 21; P < 0·0001). No significant association was found with any other class I or class II antigen.
Table 3.
Risk of developing pulmonary hypertension in presence of anti-topoisomerase II α (anti-topo II α) autoantibodies and the class I HLA-B35 antigen in 85 systemic sclerosis patients
Factor | Patients | No. of patients | Odds ratio | P* |
---|---|---|---|---|
Anti-topo II α | All | 85 | 6·36 | < 0·001 |
Anti-topo II α | HLA-B35-negative patients | 57 | 7·50 | < 0·05 |
HLA-B35 | All | 85 | 6·25 | < 0·001 |
HLA-B35 | Anti-topo II α-negative patients | 67 | 6·80 | < 0·02 |
Combined HLA-B35 and anti-topo II α | All | 85 | 21·00 | < 0·0001 |
P values were calculated using χ2 tests with Yate's correction.
DISCUSSION
Topoisomerases are ubiquitous enzymes that introduce transient single (topoisomerase I) or double (topoisomerase II) stranded breaks into DNA molecules [26]. Many antibacterial and antiblastic drugs target topoisomerases and influence key steps in their catalytic cycle [27–30]. They also form a target for autoantibodies and may be involved in the pathogenesis of certain genetic disorders [31]. Whereas DNA topoisomerase I does not fluctuate during the cell cycle [32], the two forms of topoisomerase II present different characteristics. In particular, the 170-kD α isoform varies during the cell cycle and among different cell types: it is present in proliferating cells, where it is limited to the nucleoplasm, and it has a dual enzymatic/structural role [32]. On the other hand, the 180-kD β isoform, which has been isolated from mouse and human cells, is present mainly in cells that have reached the plateau phase of growth, where it is confined to the nucleolus [33, 34]. Anti-topo I antibodies are regarded as a marker of SSc, and they have also been reported to correlate closely with pulmonary fibrosis [35]. As regards the two main clinical subtypes of SSc, anti-topo I is known to be particularly associated with dcSSc, while presence of ACA is associated with lcSSc [36, 37].
We previously reported the presence of anti-topo II α in IPF patients: using recombinant proteins, we were able to map different regions of reactivity within the topo II α molecule [13, 38]. In the present study, we found that anti-topo II α could also be detected in about 22% of our SSc patients. Its presence was not confined to one or other of the two clinical subtypes (dcSSc/lcSSc). Furthermore, no association was found with either anti-topo I or ACA. Therefore, the first major finding of the present study is the definition of a new subset of SSc patients who are positive for anti-topo II α but can be negative for anti-topo I and anti-centromere. Patients positive for anti-topo II α had a more recent presentation of SSc and worse DLco values, suggesting more aggressive and rapidly evolving disease.
IPF and SSc are both progressive fibrogenic diseases that appear to be associated with antibodies to enzymes of the topoisomerase family. However, among our SSc patients, positivity for anti-topo II α turned out to be associated with reduced DLco values and also with PHT, but not with restrictive lung disease or decreased FVC. The association between anti-topo II α and PHT is also supported by the observation that the presence of anti-topo II α was uniformly distributed among patients with either of the main forms of PHT (primary or secondary to fibrosis). Moreover, among the SSc patients with restrictive lung disease, we found that the frequency of anti-topo II α positivity was significantly higher in those who also presented PHT.
Although SSc is not primarily a genetic disorder, it is generally agreed that the disease has a genetic component [39]. Several investigators have tried to associate individual HLA class II antigens to the production of some autoantibody groups. In our patients, anti-topo II α was associated with class I but not class II HLA antigens. Furthermore, HLA-B35 correlated with PHT, independently of the presence of anti-topo II α. We are not currently able to provide an explanation for the association found between anti-topo II α, HLA-B35 and PHT. Primary PHT can be associated with autoimmune disorders [40], drug therapy or HIV infection [41, 42]. Furthermore, associations have been observed between autoantibodies and HLA in several subsets of PHT patients [43]. One possible explanation for our findings is the existence of molecular mimicry involving homology between target autoantigens and infectious agents, initiating certain autoimmune responses. An infective agent could cause immunocompetent and non-specific inflammatory cells to produce soluble mediators. In certain HLA class I subjects, this could activate and damage connective and vascular structures, as seems to occur during HIV infection [44]. Therefore, the production of autoantibodies could simply be secondary to tissue damage.
In SSc, the mimicry between sequences of retroviral p30gag protein and topoisomerase I has been proposed as a basis for such a mechanism [45]. In this scenario, the production of anti-topo I autoantibodies could represent a footprint of the retrovirus. In an earlier study on IPF, we were unable to find any significant homology between selected epitopes of topoisomerase II α and foreign pathogens [38]. However, the epitopes recognized by anti-topo II α in SSc could be different from those of IPF.
In conclusion, our results indicate that even though the presence of anti-topo II α and prevalence of HLA-B35 alleles are mutually independent factors, their simultaneous presence drastically increases the risk of developing PHT. This observation allows identification of a new serological subtype of SSc, corresponding to a separate clinical entity showing a strict association with particular HLA alleles. These concepts provide further support for the hypothesis that in SSc, multiple etiologic processes can give rise to a similar pathogenic mechanism.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to acknowledge the technical assistance of Patrizia Rappini and Graziella Salmi. We thank Dr Franco Piras (I.O.R.) for his help in statistical analysis, and Mr Robin M.T. Cooke for editing. This work was supported by grants from IRCCS ‘Istituti Ortopedici Rizzoli’ Bologna, ‘Ospedale Maggiore’ Milano and MURST, Italy.
REFERENCES
- 1.Medsger Ta., Jr . Systemic sclerosis (scleroderma): clinical aspects. In: Koopman WJ, editor. Arthritis and allied conditions. 13. Philadelphia: Williams & Wilkins; 1997. pp. 1433–64. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Douvas AS, Achten M, Tan EM. Identification of a nuclear protein (Scl-70) as a major target of human antinuclear antibodies in Scleroderma. J Biol Chem. 1979;254:10514–22. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Shero JH, Borwell B, Rothfield NF, Earnshaw WC. High titer of autoantibodies to Topoisomerase I (Scl-70) in sera from scleroderma patients. Science. 1986;231:737–40. doi: 10.1126/science.3003910. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Martin L, Pauls JD, Ryan JP, Fritzler MJ. Identification of a subset of patients with scleroderma with severe pulmonary and vascular disease by the presence of autoantibodies to centromere and hystone. Ann Rheum Dis. 1993;52:780–4. doi: 10.1136/ard.52.11.780. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Okano Y, Steen VD, Medsger Ta., Jr Autoantibody reactive with RNA polymerase III in systemic sclerosis. Ann Intern Med. 1993;119:1005–13. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-119-10-199311150-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kuwana M, Kaburaki J, Mimori T, Tojo T, Homma M. Autoantibody reactive with three classes of the RNA polymerases in sera from patients with systemic sclerosis. J Clin Invest. 1993;91:1399–404. doi: 10.1172/JCI116343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Montecucco C, Caporali R, Cobianchi F, Biamonti G. Identification of autoantibodies to the I protein of the heterogenous nuclear ribonucleoprotein complex in patients with systemic sclerosis. Arthritis Rheum. 1996;39:1669–76. doi: 10.1002/art.1780391009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Sato S, Hironobu I, Kanaki K, Kazuhiko T. Antihistone antibodies in systemic sclerosis. Association with pulmonary fibrosis. Arthritis Rheum. 1994;37:391–4. doi: 10.1002/art.1780370313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Falkner D, Wilson J, Medsger TA, Morel PA. HLA and clinical associations in systemic sclerosis patients with anti-Th/To antibodies. Arthritis Rheum. 1998;41:74–80. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(199801)41:1<74::AID-ART10>3.0.CO;2-C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Arnett FC, Reveille JD, Goldstein R, et al. Autoantibodies to fibrillarin in systemic sclerosis (scleroderma) Arthritis Rheum. 1996;39:1151–60. doi: 10.1002/art.1780390712. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Bunn CC, Black CM. Systemic sclerosis: an autoantibody mosaic. Clin Exp Immunol. 1999;117:207–8. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2249.1999.00990.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Kane GC, Varga J, Conant EF, Spirn PW, Jimenez S, Fish JE. Lung involvement in systemic sclerosis (scleroderma): relation to classification based on extent of skin involvement or autoantibody status. Respir Med. 1996;90:223–30. doi: 10.1016/s0954-6111(96)90291-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Meliconi R, Bestagno M, Sturani C, et al. Autoantibodies to DNA topoisomerase II in cryptogenic fibrosing alveolitis and connective tissue disease. Clin Exp Immunol. 1989;76:184–9. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Meliconi R, Negri C, Borzì RM, et al. Antibodies to topoisomerase II α in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Clin Rheumatol. 1993;12:311–5. doi: 10.1007/BF02231571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Zuklys KL, Szer IS, Szer W. Autoantibodies to DNA topoisomerase II in juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Exp Immunol. 1991;84:245–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.1991.tb08156.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Chang YH, Hwang J, Shang HF, Tsai ST. Characterization of human DNA topoisomerase II as an autoantigen recognized by patients with IDDM. Diabetes. 1996;45:408–14. doi: 10.2337/diab.45.4.408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Hoffmann A, Heck MM, Bordwell BJ, Rothfield NF, Earnshaw WC. Human autoantibody to topoisomerase II. Exp Cell Res. 1989;180:409–18. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(89)90067-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Subcommittee for Scleroderma Criteria of the American Rheumatism Association Diagnostic and Therapeutic Criteria Committee. Preliminary criteria for the classification of systemic sclerosis (scleroderma) Arthritis Rheum. 1980;23:581–90. doi: 10.1002/art.1780230510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.LeRoy EC, Black C, Fleischmajer R, et al. Scleroderma (systemic sclerosis): classification, subsets and pathogenesis. J Rheumatol. 1988;15:202–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kanner R, Morris A. A manual of uniform laboratory procedures for the intermountain area. Salt Lake City: Intermountain Thoracic Society; 1975. Clinical pulmonary function testing. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Currie PJ, Seward JB, Chan KL, et al. Continuous wave Doppler determination of right ventricular pressure: a simultaneous Doppler-catheterization study in 127 patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1985;6:750–6. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(85)80477-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Grigolo B, Mazzetti I, Borzì RM, Meliconi R, Origgi L, Scorza R, Facchini A. Comparison of different methods for the detection of autoantibodies in autoimmune diseases. Int J Clin Lab Res. 1995;25:205–10. doi: 10.1007/BF02592699. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Riboldi P, Asero R, Origgi L, Crespi S, Meroni PL, Sguotti C, Sabbadini MG. Antinuclear antibodies in progressive systemic sclerosis. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 1985;3:205–11. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Terasaki PI, Bernoco D, Park MS, Ozturk G, Iwaki Y. Microdroplet testing for HLA-A-B-C, and -D antigens. Am J Clin Pathol. 1978;69:103–20. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/69.2.103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Reveille JD, Moulds JM, Arnett FC. Major histocompatibility complexes class II and C4 alleles in Mexican Americans with systemic lupus erythematosus. Tissue Antigens. 1995;45:91–97. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0039.1995.tb02423.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Liu LF. DNA topoisomerases: enzymes that catalyze the breaking and rejoining of DNA. Crit Rev Biochem. 1983;15:1–24. doi: 10.3109/10409238309102799. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Shen LL, Perner AG. Mechanism of inhibition of DNA gyrase by analogues of nalidixic acid: the target of the drugs in DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1985;82:307–11. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.2.307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Yang L, Rowe TC, Liu LF. Identification of DNA topoisomerase II as an intracellular target of antitumor epipodophyllotoxin in Simian virus 40-infected monkey cells. Cancer Res. 1985;45:5872–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Nelson EM, Tewey KM, Liu LF. Mechanism of antitumor drug action: poisoning of mammalian topoisomerse II on DNA by m-AMSA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1984;81:1361–5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.5.1361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Epstein RJ, Smith PJ. Estrogen-induced potentiation of DNA damage and cytotoxicity in human breast cancer treated with topoisomerase II-interactive antitumor drugs. Cancer Res. 1988;48:297–303. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Chan JY, Becker FF, German J, Ray JH. Altered DNA ligase I activity in Bloom's syndrome cells. Nature. 1987;325:357–9. doi: 10.1038/325357a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Heck MMS, Hittelmann WN, Earnshaw WC. Differential expression of DNA topoisomerases I and II during the eukaryotic cell cycle. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1988;85:1086–90. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.4.1086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Drake FH, Hofmann GA, Bartus HF, Mattern MR, Crooke ST, Mirabelli CK. Biochemical and pharmacological properties of p170 and p180 forms of topoisomerase II. Biochemistry. 1989;28:8154–60. doi: 10.1021/bi00446a029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Negri C, Chiesa R, Cerino A, et al. Monoclonal antibodies to human DNA topoisomerase I and the two isoforms of DNA topoisomerase II: 170 and 180-KDa isozymes. Exp Cell Res. 1992;200:452–9. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(92)90195-e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Sato S, Hironobu I, Kikuchi K, Takehara K. Antihistone antibodies in systemic sclerosis. Association with pulmonary fibrosis. Arthritis Rheum. 1994;3:391–4. doi: 10.1002/art.1780370313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Dick T, Bazzanella PB, Genth E, et al. Lack of association between antihistone antibodies and pulmonary fibrosis in patients with systemic sclerosis: comment on the article by Sato. Arthritis Rheum. 1995;7:1024. doi: 10.1002/art.1780380723. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Moroi Y, Peebles C, Fritzler MJ, Steigerwald J, Tan EM. Autoantibody to centromere (kinetochore) in scleroderma sera. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1980;77:1627–31. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.3.1627. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Grigolo B, Mazzetti I, Borzì RM, et al. Mapping of topoisomerase II α epitopes recognized by autoantibodies in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Clin Exp Immunol. 1998;114:339–46. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2249.1998.00747.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Kuwana M, Kaburaki J, Arnett FC, Howard RF, Medsger Ta, Jr, Wright TM. Influence of ethnic background on clinical and serologic features in patients with systemic sclerosis and anti-DNA topoisomerase I antibody. Arthritis Rheum. 1999;42:465–74. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(199904)42:3<465::AID-ANR11>3.0.CO;2-Y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Morse JH, Barst RJ, Fotino M, et al. Primary pulmonary hypertension, tissue plasminogen activator antibodies, and HLA-DQ7. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1997;155:274–8. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.155.1.9001324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Mesa RA, Edell ES, Dunn WF, Edwards WD. Human immunodeficiency virus infection and pulmonary hypertension: two new cases and a review of 86 reported cases. Mayo Clin Proc. 1998;73:37–45. doi: 10.1016/S0025-6196(11)63616-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Conraads VM, Colebunders RL, Boshoff C, et al. Primary pulmonary hypertension in a patient with HIV infection. Acta Cardiol. 1998;53:367–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Barst RJ, Loyd JE. Genetics and immunogenetic aspects of primary pulmonary hypertension. Chest. 1998;114:231S–6S. doi: 10.1378/chest.114.3_supplement.231s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Morse JH, Barst RJ, Itescu S, Flaster ER, Sinha G, Zhang Y, Fotino M. Primary pulmonary hypertension in HIV infection: an outcome determined by particular HLA class II alleles. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1996;153:1299–301. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.153.4.8616557. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Maul GG, Jimenez SA, Riggs E, Ziemnicka-Kotula D. Determination of an epitope of the diffuse systemic sclerosis marker antigen DNA topoisomerase I. Sequence similarity with retroviral p30gag protein suggests a possible cause for autoimmunity in systemic sclerosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1989;86:8492–6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.21.8492. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]