Skip to main content
Infection and Immunity logoLink to Infection and Immunity
editorial
. 2000 Dec;68(12):7209–7211. doi: 10.1128/iai.68.12.7209-7211.2000

Murine Models of Chlamydia trachomatis Genital Tract Infection: Use of Mouse Pneumonitis Strain versus Human Strains

Servaas A Morré 1,2, Joseph M Lyons 1,2,*, James I Ito Jr 1,2
PMCID: PMC97843  PMID: 11203323

Morrison and Morrison (11) analyzed by in situ immunohistochemistry the progression of the inflammatory and cytokine responses in the genital tracts of mice. They provided an important foundation from which we can study the effects of experimentally induced perturbations in the systemic immune response on the development of local genital tract immunity. The observed cytokine responses were obtained using the Chlamydia trachomatis strain mouse pneumonitis (MoPn).

The MoPn agent, the mouse biovar of C. trachomatis, is much more virulent in mice than human strains (14), causing acute pathology throughout the genital tract and characteristically resulting in systemic infection (12). In addition, the developmental cycle of MoPn is more rapid, its duration being approximately half that of human strains, and the strain is more prolific. However, in humans the urogenital C. trachomatis serovars cause no systemic infections and upper genital tract progression, followed by pathology, usually resulting from multiple infections, is only seen in a small percentage of women (3, 13).

We have shown an important role for gamma interferon (IFN-γ) in the early clearance of chlamydia from the genital tract (4). When we infected IFN-γ−/− mice with MoPn we observed no significant differences in the clearance of chlamydiae between infected and control mice. However, when we infected animals with the human genital isolate (5, 6, 9) serovar D, we saw striking differences in infection kinetics between IFN-γ−/− and control animals beginning as early as day 4 and continuing throughout the observation period (70 days). Thus, the MoPn strain and the human C. trachomatis strains differ in response to at least one important cytokine and most likely will be found to differ in response to other cytokines.

Recently, a novel high-resolution technique has been introduced for whole-genome analysis: amplified fragment-length polymorphism (AFLP). This technique has proven its usefulness as a tool in bacterial taxonomy and epidemiology. It was shown that human isolates were clearly different from the MoPn strain of C. trachomatis (10). Both the AFLP and DNA-DNA hybridization demonstrate that the MoPn strain should be considered a separate Chlamydia species. Indeed, Everett et al. (2) proposed a reclassification of the order Chlamydiales and its current taxa based on phylogenetic analyses of the 16S and 23S rRNA genes with corroborating genetic and phenotypic information. This interesting proposal was the first topic on the program of the 4th European Chlamydia Congress in August this year (Helsinki, Finland). One of the proposed new species in this reclassification is Chlamydia muridarum sp. nov. Thus, it is the considered opinion of bacterial taxonomists that the MoPn strain differs considerably from human C. trachomatis strains.

Finally, although both in animal models and in humans specific major histocompatibility complex class I alleles and HLA types were found to be independently associated with pelvic inflammatory disease and tubal infertility (1, 7, 8), repeated pelvic inflammatory disease periods and repeated C. trachomatis infections increase the risk for tubal infertility significantly (3, 13). This is most likely based on enhanced autoimmune reactivities, including heat shock protein 60 autoimmunity. This demonstrates that proteins expressed by the microorganism are the determinants for the immunologic response of the host, emphasizing the importance of the choice of the chlamydial strain to be used as a model for genital tract infection.

Thus, it seems to be worthwhile and potentially clinically more relevant to investigate the cytokine profiles in the murine genital tract during the course of infection using human C. trachomatis strains and to compare those cytokine responses to the results obtained with the MoPn agent. Through this comparison, a basis for the selection of the most appropriate strain for use in murine models of human genital tract infection can be made.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Cohen C R, Sinei S S, Bukusi E A, Bwayo J J, Holmes K K, Brunham R C. Human leukocyte antigen class II DQ alleles associated with Chlamydia trachomatistubal infertility. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;95:72–77. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(99)00541-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Everett K D, Bush R M, Andersen A A. Emended description of the order Chlamydiales, proposal of Parachlamydiaceae fam. nov. and Simkaniaceae fam. nov., each containing one monotypic genus, revised taxonomy of the family Chlamydiaceae, including a new genus and five new species, and standards for the identification of the organisms. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1999;49:415–440. doi: 10.1099/00207713-49-2-415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hillis S D, Owens L M, Marchbanks P A, Amsterdam L E, MacKenzie W R. Recurrent chlamydial infections increase the risk of hospitalisation for ectopic pregnancy and pelvic inflammatory disease. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;1:103–106. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(97)80020-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ito J I, Lyons J M. Role of gamma interferon in controlling murine chlamydial genital tract infection. Infect Immun. 1999;67:5518–5521. doi: 10.1128/iai.67.10.5518-5521.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ito J I, Lyons J M, Airo-Brown L P. Variation in virulence among oculogenital serovars of Chlamydia trachomatisin experimental genital tract infection. Infect Immun. 1990;58:2021–2023. doi: 10.1128/iai.58.6.2021-2023.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ito J I, Harrison H R, Alexander E R, Billings L J. Establishment of genital tract infection in the CF-1 mouse by intravaginal inoculation of a human oculogenital isolate of Chlamydia trachomatis. J Infect Dis. 1984;150:577–582. doi: 10.1093/infdis/150.4.577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kimani J, Maclean I W, Bwayo J J, MacDonald K, Oyugi J, Maitha G M, Peeling R W, Cheang M, Nagelkerke N J, Plummer F A, Brunham R C. Risk factors for Chlamydia trachomatispelvic inflammatory disease among sex workers in Nairobi, Kenya. J Infect Dis. 1996;173:1437–1444. doi: 10.1093/infdis/173.6.1437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Lichtenwalner A B, Patton D L, Cosgrove Sweeney Y T, Gaur L K, Stamm W E. Evidence of genetic susceptibility to Chlamydia trachomatis-induced pelvic inflammatory disease in the pig-tailed macaque. Infect Immun. 1997;65:2250–2253. doi: 10.1128/iai.65.6.2250-2253.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lyons J M, Ito J I. Reducing the risk of Chlamydia trachomatisgenital tract infection by evaluating the prophylactic potential of vaginally applied chemicals. Clin Infect Dis. 1995;21(Suppl. 2):S174–S177. doi: 10.1093/clinids/21.supplement_2.s174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Meijer A, Morré S A, van den Brule A J C, Savelkoul P H M, Ossewaarde J M. Genomic relatedness of Chlamydiaisolates determined by amplified fragment length polymorphism analysis. J Bacteriol. 1999;181:4469–4475. doi: 10.1128/jb.181.15.4469-4475.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Morrison S G, Morrison R P. In situ analysis of the evolution of the primary immune response in murine Chlamydia trachomatisgenital tract infection. Infect Immun. 2000;68:2870–2879. doi: 10.1128/iai.68.5.2870-2879.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Nigg C. Unidentified virus which produces pneumoniae and systemic infection in mice. Science. 1942;95:49. doi: 10.1126/science.95.2454.49-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Weström L, Joesoef R, Reynolds G, Hadgu A, Tompson S E. Pelvic inflammatory disease and fertility. A cohort study of 1844 women with laparoscopically verified disease and 657 control women with normal laparoscopic results. Sex Transm Dis. 1992;19:185–192. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Williams D M, Schachter J, Drutz D J, Sumaya C V. Pneumonia due to Chlamydia trachomatisin the immunocompromised (nude) mouse. J Infect Dis. 1981;143:238–241. doi: 10.1093/infdis/143.2.238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Infect Immun. 2000 Dec;68(12):7209–7211.

AUTHOR'S REPLY

Richard P Morrison 1

Morré, Lyons, and Ito, Jr., raise several issues that relate to the legitimacy of the Chlamydia trachomatis mouse pneumonitis (MoPn) murine model of genital tract infection (1-7). The MoPn model is far more comparable to human chlamydial genital tract infection than alluded to by Morré et al. Vaginal inoculation of MoPn results in an infection that naturally ascends from the lower genital tract (vagina and cervix) to infect upper genital tract tissues (uterine horns and oviducts) (1-1, 1-6). The inflammatory response and postinfection sequelae that develop following MoPn infection, such as tubal occlusion, hydrosalpinx, and infertility, are characteristic of chlamydial genital tract infection in women (1-16). Conversely, vaginal inoculation of mice with human biovars of C. trachomatis produces a mild infection of the lower genital tract, which is characterized by the shedding of fewer chlamydiae for a shorter duration (1-9). Human biovars cause postinfection sequelae in mice only when high doses are inoculated directly into the uterine horns or ovarian bursa (1-14, 1-15). Systemic MoPn infection per se does not develop following vaginal inoculation. Occasionally, low numbers of MoPn are isolated from systemic sites (1-2; R. P. Morrison, unpublished data), but pathological changes are only observed in genital tract tissues. Perhaps vaginal infection of mice with human biovars also results in low levels of systemic chlamydiae, but such information is not presently available.

Comparing the incidence of upper genital tract pathology in the MoPn model to that of natural infection of women is potentially problematic. A plethora of confounding variables, such as host genetic influences, antibiotic treatment early during the course of infection, etc., profoundly influence the progression of chlamydial disease in experimental models (1-3, 1-12, 1-13) and perhaps similarly affect disease progression in humans. Nevertheless, the pathology of the upper genital tract of MoPn infected mice is comparable to that of women with post-chlamydial infection sequelae (1-6, 1-7, 1-16). The assertion that tubal infertility or other postinfection sequelae result from “enhanced autoimmune reactivities, including heat shock protein 60 autoimmunity,” is scientifically unsubstantiated. There exists no direct evidence that autoimmune responses contribute to the pathogenesis of chlamydial genital tract disease.

Amplified fragment-length polymorphism provides only a glimpse of the relative genetic relatedness among chlamydial isolates (1-5). On the other hand, the genomic sequence analyses of MoPn and serovar D conclusively reveal striking similarities in gene content and the order of genes within the chromosomes (1-10, 1-11). MoPn and human biovars clearly display differences in host range, but that does not a priori dismiss the MoPn infection model as an inappropriate correlate of human infection. In fact, the authors of the above-mentioned genomic study state that “the extraordinary conservation offers encouragement for investigators using the MoPn biovar to model disease caused by human biovars of C. trachomatis.”

Differences in the response of MoPn and human biovars of C. trachomatis to gamma interferon is an important consideration, and perhaps a possible shortcoming of the MoPn model of genital tract infection. The role of gamma interferon in both MoPn and human biovar models of infection has been extensively evaluated by several research groups not cited by Morré et al. (1-2, 1-4, 1-8, 1-9). Particularly applicable is the study by Perry et al. (1-9), who quite eloquently address in their discussion how differences in sensitivity to gamma interferon may influence the pathogenesis of murine and human chlamydial infection.

Although not flawless, MoPn genital tract infection of mice is a reasonable model for the study of Chlamydia-host interactions. It is important to recognize, however, that regardless of the model, the pathogenesis of human chlamydial infections will only be understood through a more thorough investigation of chlamydial infection in its natural human host.

REFERENCES

  • 1-1.Barron A L, White H J, Rank R G, Soloff B L, Moses E B. A new animal model for the study of Chlamydia trachomatisgenital infections: infection of mice with the agent of mouse pneumonitis. J Infect Dis. 1981;143:63–66. doi: 10.1093/infdis/143.1.63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 1-2.Cotter T W, Ramsey K H, Miranpuri G S, Poulsen C E, Byrne G I. Dissemination of Chlamydia trachomatischronic genital tract infection in gamma interferon gene knockout mice. Infect Immun. 1997;65:2145–2152. doi: 10.1128/iai.65.6.2145-2152.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 1-3.de la Maza L M, Pal S, Khamesipour A, Peterson E M. Intravaginal inoculation of mice with the Chlamydia trachomatismouse pneumonitis biovar results in infertility. Infect Immun. 1994;62:2094–2097. doi: 10.1128/iai.62.5.2094-2097.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 1-4.Johansson M, Schon K, Ward M, Lycke N. Genital tract infection with Chlamydia trachomatisfails to induce protective immunity in gamma interferon receptor-deficient mice despite a strong local immunoglobulin A response. Infect Immun. 1997;65:1032–1044. doi: 10.1128/iai.65.3.1032-1044.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 1-5.Meijer A, Morré S A, van den Brule A J C, Savelkoul P H M, Ossewaarde J M. Genomic relatedness of Chlamydiaisolates determined by amplified fragment length polymorphism analysis. J Bacteriol. 1999;181:4469–4475. doi: 10.1128/jb.181.15.4469-4475.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 1-6.Morrison R P, Feilzer K, Tumas D B. Gene knockout mice establish a primary protective role for major histocompatibility complex class II-restricted responses in Chlamydia trachomatisgenital tract infection. Infect Immun. 1995;63:4661–4668. doi: 10.1128/iai.63.12.4661-4668.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 1-7.Morrison S G, Morrison R P. In situ analysis of the evolution of the primary immune response in murine Chlamydia trachomatisgenital tract infection. Infect Immun. 2000;68:2870–2879. doi: 10.1128/iai.68.5.2870-2879.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 1-8.Perry L L, Feilzer K, Caldwell H D. Immunity to Chlamydia trachomatisis mediated by T helper 1 cells through IFN-γ-dependent and -independent pathways. J Immunol. 1997;158:3344–3352. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 1-9.Perry L L, Su H, Feilzer K, Messer R, Hughes S, Whitmire W, Caldwell H D. Differential sensitivity of distinct Chlamydia trachomatisisolates to IFN-γ-mediated inhibition. J Immunol. 1999;162:3541–3548. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 1-10.Read T D, Brunham R C, Shen C, Gill S R, Heidelberg J F, White O, Hickey E K, Peterson J, Utterback T, Berry K, Bass S, Linher K, Weidman J, Khouri H, Craven B, Bowman C, Dodson R, Gwinn M, Nelson W, DeBoy R, Kolonay J, McClarty G, Salzberg S L, Eisen J, Fraser C M. Genome sequences of Chlamydia trachomatis MoPn and Chlamydia pneumoniaeAR39. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28:1397–1406. doi: 10.1093/nar/28.6.1397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 1-11.Stephens R S, Kalman S, Lammel C, Fan J, Marathe R, Aravind L, Mitchell W, Olinger L, Tatusov R, Zhao Q, Koonin E V, Davis R W. Genome sequence of an obligate intracellular pathogen of humans: Chlamydia trachomatis. Science. 1998;282:754–759. doi: 10.1126/science.282.5389.754. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 1-12.Su H, Morrison R P, Messer R, Whitmire W, Hughes S, Caldwell H D. The effect of doxycycline treatment on the development of protective immunity in a murine model of chlamydial genital infection. J Infect Dis. 1999;180:1252–1258. doi: 10.1086/315046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 1-13.Swenson C E, Sung M L, Schachter J. The effect of tetracycline treatment on chlamydial salpingitis and subsequent fertility in the mouse. Sex Transm Dis. 1986;13:40–44. doi: 10.1097/00007435-198601000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 1-14.Tuffrey M, Falder P, Gale J, Quinn R, Taylor-Robinson D. Infertility in mice infected genitally with a human strain of Chlamydia trachomatis. J Reprod Fertil. 1986;78:251–260. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.0780251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 1-15.Tuffrey M, Falder P, Gale J, Taylor-Robinson D. Salpingitis in mice induced by human strains of Chlamydia trachomatis. Br J Exp Pathol. 1986;67:605–616. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 1-16.Winkler B, Crum C. Chlamydia trachomatisinfection of the female genital tract. Pathogenic and clinopathologic correlations. Pathol Annu. 1984;5:193–221. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Infection and Immunity are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES