Abstract
Objectives: The aim was to evaluate whether women who have early follicular follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) levels >12 mIU/ml have reduced response to follicular stimulation for in vitro fertilization (IVF) in a following month, in spite of normal FSH levels.
Materials and methods: In a 3-year period from January 1996 to December 1998, 303 women aged 38 years and above and/or who had previously responded poorly to superovulation for IVF gave blood samples for FSH, luteinizing hormone (LH), and estradiol (E2) on day 2 of menstruation before commencing treatment.
Results: In 117 (38.6%) of these women, FSH levels were >12 mIU/ml (range 12–114 mIU/ml). Sixty-six of these women gave a further 130 blood samples for FSH measurement in the following months. Seventy-eight (60.0%) of the tests showed raised FSH value >12 mIU/ml. Thirty women whose repeat FSH levels were <12 mIU/ml underwent 41 IVF cycles (group 1). Sixty-three other women, older than 38 and/or who had a poor response to superovulation previously and whose FSH levels were <12 mIU/ml, served as the control group (group II). There were no differences in the responses to superovulation and delivery rates between the two groups (14.6% vs. 12.7%).
Conclusions: Women whose early follicular phase FSH levels were raised >12 mIU/ml had an increased risk (>50%) that in subsequent cycles levels would remain raised, and it was not possible to predict which individuals would have favorable FSH levels. If the cycle day 2 FSH level returns to a “normal” level of <12 mIU/ml, women aged 40 and above had substantial cycle cancellation rates (43%), but patients who achieved the stage of embryo transfer had a good chance of conceiving, regardless of their age.
Keywords: follicle-stimulating hormone, ovulation induction, ovarian reserve, in vitro fertilization, treatment outcome
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (99.4 KB).
REFERENCES
- 1.Richardson SJ, Senikas V, Nelson JF. Follicular depletion during the menopausal transition: Evidence for accelerated loss and ultimate exhaustion. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1987;65:1231–1237. doi: 10.1210/jcem-65-6-1231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Faddy MJ, Gosden RG. A mathematical model of follicle dynamics in the human ovary. Hum Reprod. 1995;10:770–775. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Croucher C, Lass A, Margara R, Winston RM. Predictive value of the results of a first in vitro fertilization cycle on the outcome of subsequent cycles. Hum Reprod. 1998;13:403–408. doi: 10.1093/humrep/13.2.403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Lass A, Croucher C, Duffy S, et al. 1000 initiated cycles of in vitro fertilization in women of 40 years old or more. Fertil Steril. 1998;70:1030–1034. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(98)00353-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Padilla SL, Garcia JE. Effect of maternal age and number of in vitro fertilization procedures on pregnancy outcome. Fertil Steril. 1989;52:270–273. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)60854-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Dicker D, Goldman JA, Ashkenazi J, et al. Age and pregnancy rates in in vitro fertilization. J In Vitro Fertil Embryo Transfer. 1991;8:141–144. doi: 10.1007/BF01131703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Arthur ID, Anthony FW, Masson GM, Thomas EJ. The selection criteria on an IVF program can remove the association between maternal age and implantation. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1994;73:562–566. doi: 10.3109/00016349409006273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Alsalili M, Yuzpe AA, Tummon IS, et al. Confounding variables in IVF success: A decade of experience. J Assist Repro Genet. 1995;12:88–91. doi: 10.1007/BF02211375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Bopp BL, Alper MM, Thompson IE, Mortola J. Success rates with gamete intrafallopian transfer and in vitro fertilization in women of advanced maternal age. Fertil Steril. 1995;63:1278–1283. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)57611-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Scott RT, Toner JP, Muasher SJ, et al. Follicle-stimulating hormone levels on cycle day 3 are predictive of in vitro fertilisation outcome. Fertil Steril. 1989;51:651–654. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)60615-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Toner JP, Philput CB, Jones GS, Mausher SJ. Basal follicle stimulating hormone level is a better predictor of in vitro fertilisation performance than age. Fertil Steril. 1991;55:784–791. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)54249-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Sharara FI, Scott RT, Seifer DB. The detection of diminished ovarian reserve in infertile women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;179:804–812. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(98)70087-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Wallach EE. Pitfalls in evaluating ovarian reserve. Fertil Steril. 1995;63:12–14. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)57288-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Scott RT, Hofmann GE. Prognostic assessment of ovarian reserve. Fertil Steril. 1995;63:1–11. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Martin JS, Nisker JA, Tummon IS, et al. Future in vitro fertilization pregnancy potential of women with variably elevated day 3 follicle-stimulating hormone levels. Fertil Steril. 1996;65:1238–1240. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)58347-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Macnamee MC, Brinsden PR: Superovulation strategies in assisted conception. In A Textbook of In Vitro fertilization and Assisted Reproduction, 2nd ed, PR Brinsden (ed). Parthenon Publishing, Carnforth, UK, pp 91-102
- 17.Brinsden P: Oocyte recovery and embryo transfer techniques for in vitro fertilization. In A Textbook of In Vitro fertilization and Assisted Reproduction, 2nd ed. PR Brinsden (ed). Parthenon Publishing, Carnforth, UK, 171-184
- 18.Elder KT: Laboratory techniques: Oocyte collection and embryo culture. In A Textbook of In Vitro fertilization and Assisted Reproduction, 2nd ed. PR Brinsden (ed). Parthenon Publishing, Carnforth, UK, 185-202
- 19.Gougeon A. Regulation of ovarian follicular development in primates: Facts and hypotheses. Endocrine Rev. 1996;17:121–155. doi: 10.1210/edrv-17-2-121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Faddy MJ, Gosden RG. A model confirming the decline in follicle numbers to the age of menopause in women. Hum Reprod. 1996;11:1484–1486. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019422. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Mausher SJ, Oehninger S, Simonetti S, et al. The value of basal and/or stimulated serum gonadotrophin levels in prediction of stimulation response and in vitro fertilization outcome. Fertil Steril. 1988;50:298–307. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)60077-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Buyalos RP, Daneshmand S, Brzechffa PR. Basal estradiol and follicle-stimulating hormone predict fecundity in women of advanced reproductive age undergoing ovulation induction therapy. Fertil Steril. 1997;68:272–277. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(97)81514-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Ranieri DM, Quinn F, Makhlouf A, et al. Simultanous evaluation of basal follicle-stimulating hormone and 17 beta-estradiol response to gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogue stimulation: An improved predictor of ovarian reserve. Fertil Steril. 1998;70:227–233. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(98)00159-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Cahill DJ, Wardle PG. Age and basal follicle stimulating hormone as predictors in in vitro fertilisation outcome. Br JObstet Gynaecol. 1998;105:1129–1130. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1998.tb09959.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Sharif K, Elgendy M, Lashen H, Afnan M. Age and basal follicle stimulating hormone as predictors of in vitro fertilisation outcome. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998;105:107–112. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1998.tb09360.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Mukherjee T, Copperman AB, Lapinski R, et al. An elevated day three follicle-stimulating hormone:luteinizing hormone ratio (FSH:LH) in the presence of a normal day 3 FSH predicts a poor response to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation. Fertil Steril. 1996;65:588–593. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)58159-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Toner JP. The significance of elevated FSH for reproductive function. Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 1993;7:283–295. doi: 10.1016/s0950-3552(05)80131-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Evers JL, Slaats P, Land JA, et al. Elevated levels of basal estradiol-17 beta predict poor response in patients with normal basal levels of follicle-stimulating hormone undergoing in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 1998;69:1010–1014. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(98)00080-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Hansen LM, Batzer FB, Gutmann JN, et al. Evaluation ovarian reserve: Follicle stimulating hormone and estradiol variability during cycle days 2-5. Hum Reprod. 1996;11:486–489. doi: 10.1093/humrep/11.3.486. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Hershlag A, Lesser M, Montefusco D, et al. Interinstitutional variability of follicle-stimulating hormone and oestradiol levels. Fertil Steril. 1992;58:1123–1126. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Scott RT, Hofmann GE, Oehninger S, Muasher SJ. Intercycle variability of day 3 follicle-stimulating hormone levels and its effect on stimulation quality in in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 1990;53:297–302. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)53707-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Buyalos RP, Ghosh K, Daneshmand S. Infertile women of advanced reproductive age. Variability of day 3 FSH and E2 levels. J Reprod Med. 1998;43:1023–1026. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Sherman BM, West JH, Koreman SG. The menopausal transition: Analysis of LH, FSH, estradiol and progesterone concentrations during menstrual cycles in older women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1976;42:629–636. doi: 10.1210/jcem-42-4-629. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]