Skip to main content
The BMJ logoLink to The BMJ
. 2001 Apr 28;322(7293):1061.

Screening for familial hypercholesterolaemia

Funding is difficult to obtain but screening can be international

Brian Tomlinson 1,2,3, Irene Wei Lan 1,2,3, Ian Hamilton-Craig 1,2,3
PMCID: PMC1120195  PMID: 11349660

Editor—Bhatnagar et al highlighted the cost effective approach of screening family members of probands with the dominant condition of familial hypercholesterolaemia to identify affected relatives at high risk for atheromatous vascular disease.1 We would like to raise three additional points.

Firstly, patients with clinical features of familial hypercholesterolaemia are often not given an accurate diagnosis unless they come to the attention of a physician interested in lipid disorders. Examination of the Achilles tendons for xanthoma is often overlooked during the routine physical examination, even in patients with very high plasma concentrations of cholesterol and obvious xanthelasmata or prominent premature corneal arcus, so that the precise clinical diagnosis of familial hypercholesterolaemia, with the implications for family screening, may not be made.

Even cardiologists who have a direct interest in the consequences of the disease may not diagnose it because of a preoccupation with the acute events, intervention procedures, and rapid transfer or discharge of patients before plasma concentrations of cholesterol are available.2 All doctors should therefore be aware of the familial nature of this condition so that probands can be identified and referred to specialist lipid clinics or other facilities that can undertake family screening.

Secondly, although this type of screening is cost effective, it remains difficult to obtain funding.3 In Hong Kong we screened more than 300 family members of probands for a postgraduate degree study without any specific funding except for a research grant for genetic studies in a subgroup of these patients.4 Funding for such activities should be available from government health services as this saves costs in the long term, but many health service providers may not regard this as a priority, especially as the treatment of affected subjects will result in an increase in short term expenditure on drug budgets.

Lastly, the screening of family members does not have to be restricted by national boundaries in these days of rapid easy communication. About half of the families we screened had members living in other countries, and members of an extended family in Hong Kong and Singapore have been identified with the same mutation. This approach to the identification of subjects with genetic disease was championed by the late Professor Roger Williams, who initiated the MEDPED (make early diagnosis, prevent early deaths) organisation.5 Currently more than 28 countries have enrolled over 25 000 patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia in a major international collaboration funded by various international healthcare agencies and pharmaceutical companies to identify subjects with this serious but treatable genetic condition.

Footnotes

The MEDPED Australia website is www.medped-aust.com

References

  • 1.Bhatnagar D, Morgan J, Siddiq S, Mackness MI, Miller JP, Durrington PN. Outcome of case finding among relatives of patients with known heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia. BMJ. 2000;321:1497–1500. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7275.1497. . (16 December.) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Dorsch MF, Lawrance RA, Durham NP, Hall AS. Familial hypercholesterolaemia is underdiagnosed after AMI. BMJ. 2001;322:111. . (13 January.) [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Neil HAW, Hammond T, Huxley R, Matthews DR, Humphries SE. Extent of underdiagnosis of familial hypercholesterolaemia in routine practice: prospective registry study. BMJ. 2000;321:148. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7254.148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Mak YT, Pang CP, Tomlinson B, Zhang J, Chan YS, Mak TW, et al. Mutations in the low-density lipoprotein receptor gene in Chinese familial hypercholesterolemia patients. Arterioscl Throm Vas. 1998;18:1600–1605. doi: 10.1161/01.atv.18.10.1600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Williams RR, Schumacher MC, Barlow GK, Hunt SC, Ware JL, Pratt M, Latham BD. Documented need for more effective diagnosis and treatment of familial hypercholesterolemia according to data from 502 heterozygotes in Utah. Am J Cardiol. 1993;72:18D–24D. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(93)90006-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
BMJ. 2001 Apr 28;322(7293):1061.

Early identification and treatment of patients is important

Paul Nicholls 1,2,3, Ian Young 1,2,3, Kelly Lyttle 1,2,3, Colin Graham 1,2,3

Editor—Familial hypercholesterolaemia is the commonest single gene disorder, thought to affect about one in 500 of the population in the United Kingdom. It is treatable with statins. As Bhatnagar et al point out in their study,1-1 the risk of developing cardiovascular disease in affected people is far higher than the Framingham data would suggest. For affected men aged 30-50, the risk is almost 100-fold compared with unaffected men.1-2 Early identification and treatment of such patients is important, and their subsequent treatment is likely to be efficient in preventing early onset coronary heart disease and thus highly cost effective. The best place to start is in already defined family groups.

In our study of 38 families with definite familial hypercholesterolaemia (tendon xanthomata present in at least one person) and 120 families with probable familial hypercholesterolaemia (no tendon xanthomata recorded but all the other features of familial hypercholesterolaemia), we identified the responsible mutation in 30 (79%) and 22 (18%), respectively.1-2,1-3 Since then the proportion in families with definite familial hypercholesterolaemia has increased to 90% with the description of cryptic splice defects in the intron region of the low density lipoprotein receptor gene.1-4

Using these results, we have also adopted the approach of nurse led family screening. A specialist part time nurse visits the families in their own home, seeing as many relatives as possible (not just first degree relatives). The degree of compliance is high; almost every family group approached has been keen to avail themselves of this facility. Although we and others initially considered possible psychological upset, this does not seem to have been a problem in practice.

Screening for defined mutations is more specific than measuring cholesterol concentrations, and wherever possible it should be used to confirm the clinical diagnosis. This will permit accurate identification of affected persons at a young age and will distinguish the presence of familial hypercholesterolaemia from coincidental polygenic hypercholesterolaemia occurring in the same kindred. Using cholesterol alone can result in overlap between affected and unaffected people, which could lead to conflicting advice.1-5 This does, however, raise the question whether the risk of cardiovascular disease is related to the mutation itself or to the degree of cholesterol elevation. The answers to these and other questions, such as response to treatment with different mutations, are likely to be found in longer term studies of the genotype:phenotype correlation.

We support the approach of the Manchester group and the setting up of a national database of patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia to complement the work of the Simon Broome Trust.

References

  • 1-1.Bhatnagar D, Morgan J, Siddiq S, Mackness MI, Miller JP, Durrington PN. Outcome of case finding among relatives of patients with known heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia. BMJ. 2000;321:1497–1500. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7275.1497. . (16 December.) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 1-2.Steering Committee, Simon Broome Register Group. Risk of fatal coronary heart disease in familial hypercholesterolaemia. BMJ. 1991;303:893–896. doi: 10.1136/bmj.303.6807.893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 1-3.Graham CA, McClean E, Ward AJM, Beattie ED, Martin S, O'Kane M, et al. Mutation screening and genotype:phenotype correlation in familial hypercholesterolaemia. Atherosclerosis. 1999;147:309–316. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9150(99)00201-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 1-4.Kirk CW, Graham CA, Lyttle K, Beattie ED, Nicholls DP. A cryptic splice mutation (ivs 12+11 c>g) in the ldlr gene in five families with familial hypercholesterolaemia. J Med Genet. 2000;37(suppl 1):S73. [Google Scholar]
  • 1-5.Ward AJ, O'Kane M, Nicholls DP, Young IS, Nevin NC, Graham CA. A novel single base deletion in the LDLR gene (211delG): effect on serum lipid profiles and the influence of other genetic polymorphisms in the ACE, APOE and APOB genes. Atherosclerosis. 1996;120:83–91. doi: 10.1016/0021-9150(95)05685-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from BMJ : British Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES