Abstract
Growth agglutination and growth inhibition tests were established for the diagnosis of Brucella abortus infection. The former involves the agglutination of living organisms while the latter is a bactericidal test. Using mouse, guinea-pig, rabbit and bovine serum it was shown that the growth agglutination test is approximately ten times, and the growth inhibition test one hundred times, more sensitive than the conventional tube agglutination test. It is suggested that these techniques may be of assistance in diagnosing bovine brucellosis in situations in which the tube agglutination test results are suspected of being falsely negative.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Huddleson I. F., Wood E. E., Cressman A. R., Bennett G. R. The Bactericidal Action of Bovine Blood for Brucella and Its Possible Significance. J Bacteriol. 1945 Sep;50(3):261–277. doi: 10.1128/jb.50.3.261-277.1945. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kenny K., Herzberg M. Antibody response and protection induced by immunization with smooth and rough strains in experimental salmonellosis. J Bacteriol. 1968 Feb;95(2):406–417. doi: 10.1128/jb.95.2.406-417.1968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- MUSCHEL L. H., TREFFERS H. P. Quantitative studies on the bactericidal actions of serum and complement. I. A rapid photometric growth assay for bactericidal activity. J Immunol. 1956 Jan;76(1):1–10. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Morgan W. J. The serological diagnosis of bovine brucellosis. Vet Rec. 1967 May 27;80(21):612–620. doi: 10.1136/vr.80.21.612. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]