Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health logoLink to Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
. 2001 Oct;55(10):731–737. doi: 10.1136/jech.55.10.731

Adolescents' proxy reports of parents' socioeconomic status: How valid are they?

N Lien 1, C Friestad 1, K Klepp 1
PMCID: PMC1731778  PMID: 11553657

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE—Children's proxy reports on indicators of their parents' socioeconomic status (SES) have either been used uncritically or dismissed as invalid. This paper examines the validity of young adolescents' reports of parental SES by comparing adolescent reports with parents' own reports of SES.
DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS—In 1990, 924 13 year olds, along with 648 of their fathers and 735 of their mothers, participated in the baseline survey of The Norwegian Longitudinal Health Behaviour Study. Data on parental occupation were collected from both adolescents and parents at baseline, while data on parental education were collected at follow up from the adolescents at age 15 and from their parents when the adolescents were 19 years old.
MAIN RESULTS—Three different ways of grouping the SES categories based on occupational data were investigated, and the strength of agreement was good for all three groups, with κ statistics ranging from 0.65 to 0.86. There were no significant improvements of agreement when comparing adolescent data from age 15 to adolescent data from age 13. The strength of agreements between the adolescents' and parents' reports of parental education were fair; κ statistics were 0.30 and 0.38 for fathers' and mothers' education, respectively. The proportions of unclassified answers or no responses from the adolescents were similar for questions on occupation and education, and ranged from 11% to 16%.
CONCLUSIONS—The agreement between adolescents' and parents' reports of SES based on occupation was judged to be good, but adding a few specific questions may cue the adolescent to provide more detailed information, thereby reducing the numbers of unclassified answers or non-responders.


Keywords: proxy; socioeconomic status; adolescents

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (173.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Abramson J. H., Gofin R., Habib J., Pridan H., Gofin J. Indicators of social class. A comparative appraisal of measures for use in epidemiological studies. Soc Sci Med. 1982;16(20):1739–1746. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(82)90267-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Adler N. E., Ostrove J. M. Socioeconomic status and health: what we know and what we don't. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1999;896:3–15. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1999.tb08101.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Currie C. E., Elton R. A., Todd J., Platt S. Indicators of socioeconomic status for adolescents: the WHO Health Behaviour in School-aged Children Survey. Health Educ Res. 1997 Sep;12(3):385–397. doi: 10.1093/her/12.3.385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Durkin M. S., Islam S., Hasan Z. M., Zaman S. S. Measures of socioeconomic status for child health research: comparative results from Bangladesh and Pakistan. Soc Sci Med. 1994 May;38(9):1289–1297. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(94)90192-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hupkens C. L., Knibbe R. A., Van Otterloo A. H., Drop M. J. Class differences in the food rules mothers impose on their children: a cross-national study. Soc Sci Med. 1998 Nov;47(9):1331–1339. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(98)00211-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Johansson L., Thelle D. S., Solvoll K., Bjørneboe G. E., Drevon C. A. Healthy dietary habits in relation to social determinants and lifestyle factors. Br J Nutr. 1999 Mar;81(3):211–220. doi: 10.1017/s0007114599000409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Koivusilta L., Rimpelä A., Rimpelä M. Health related lifestyle in adolescence predicts adult educational level: a longitudinal study from Finland. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1998 Dec;52(12):794–801. doi: 10.1136/jech.52.12.794. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Liberatos P., Link B. G., Kelsey J. L. The measurement of social class in epidemiology. Epidemiol Rev. 1988;10:87–121. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a036030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Macintyre S. Understanding the social patterning of health: the role of the social sciences. J Public Health Med. 1994 Mar;16(1):53–59. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a042936. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Maclure M., Willett W. C. Misinterpretation and misuse of the kappa statistic. Am J Epidemiol. 1987 Aug;126(2):161–169. doi: 10.1093/aje/126.2.161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Nelson L. M., Longstreth W. T., Jr, Koepsell T. D., van Belle G. Proxy respondents in epidemiologic research. Epidemiol Rev. 1990;12:71–86. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a036063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Roos E., Lahelma E., Virtanen M., Prättälä R., Pietinen P. Gender, socioeconomic status and family status as determinants of food behaviour. Soc Sci Med. 1998 Jun;46(12):1519–1529. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(98)00032-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Uitenbroek D. G., Kerekovska A., Festchieva N. Health lifestyle behaviour and socio-demographic characteristics. A study of Varna, Glasgow and Edinburgh. Soc Sci Med. 1996 Aug;43(3):367–377. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(95)00399-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES