Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry logoLink to Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry
. 2002 Feb;72(2):188–192. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.72.2.188

Which CT features help predict outcome after head injury?

J Wardlaw 1, V Easton 1, P Statham 1
PMCID: PMC1737755  PMID: 11796768

Abstract

Background: Information collected at baseline can be useful in predicting patient outcome after head injury. The appearance of the CT brain scan may add useful baseline information. The aim of this study was to evaluate which features on the admission CT scan might add significantly to other baseline clinical information for predicting survival in patients with head injury.

Methods: Baseline CT scans were reviewed for patients with all grades of traumatic head injury in a head injury registry, in which baseline demographic and injury status and outcome at 1 year were recorded. Details from the CT scan on haemorrhage, brain swelling, and focal or diffuse damage were noted blind to clinical or outcome information and the scans classified according to the simple seven point grading (normal, mild, moderate, or severe focal injury, mild, moderate, or severe diffuse injury). An existing CT scoring system, the trauma coma databank (TCDB) classification, was also used. Logistic regression modelling was used to test the value of the CT appearance, in addition to the other baseline clinical characteristics, in predicting survival at 1 year.

Results: 425 CT scans were read from patients with all severities of injury. Significant independent outcome predictors were age, Glasgow coma score (GCS), pupil reaction, presence of subarachnoid blood, and the simple grading of the overall appearance of the scan (all p<0.001). The TCDB classification was not a significant predictor of outcome.

Conclusion: Age, GCS, and pupil reaction were all previously shown to be significant predictors of patient survival after head injury. A further two, easy to identify, CT scan variables are independent prognostic variables, and might help to identify patients at high risk of death at the time of admission.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (108.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aldrich E. F., Eisenberg H. M., Saydjari C., Luerssen T. G., Foulkes M. A., Jane J. A., Marshall L. F., Marmarou A., Young H. F. Diffuse brain swelling in severely head-injured children. A report from the NIH Traumatic Coma Data Bank. J Neurosurg. 1992 Mar;76(3):450–454. doi: 10.3171/jns.1992.76.3.0450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Culotta V. P., Sementilli M. E., Gerold K., Watts C. C. Clinicopathological heterogeneity in the classification of mild head injury. Neurosurgery. 1996 Feb;38(2):245–250. doi: 10.1097/00006123-199602000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Eisenberg H. M., Gary H. E., Jr, Aldrich E. F., Saydjari C., Turner B., Foulkes M. A., Jane J. A., Marmarou A., Marshall L. F., Young H. F. Initial CT findings in 753 patients with severe head injury. A report from the NIH Traumatic Coma Data Bank. J Neurosurg. 1990 Nov;73(5):688–698. doi: 10.3171/jns.1990.73.5.0688. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Fearnside M. R., Cook R. J., McDougall P., McNeil R. J. The Westmead Head Injury Project outcome in severe head injury. A comparative analysis of pre-hospital, clinical and CT variables. Br J Neurosurg. 1993;7(3):267–279. doi: 10.3109/02688699309023809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gennarelli T. A., Spielman G. M., Langfitt T. W., Gildenberg P. L., Harrington T., Jane J. A., Marshall L. F., Miller J. D., Pitts L. H. Influence of the type of intracranial lesion on outcome from severe head injury. J Neurosurg. 1982 Jan;56(1):26–32. doi: 10.3171/jns.1982.56.1.0026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Greene K. A., Marciano F. F., Johnson B. A., Jacobowitz R., Spetzler R. F., Harrington T. R. Impact of traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage on outcome in nonpenetrating head injury. Part I: A proposed computerized tomography grading scale. J Neurosurg. 1995 Sep;83(3):445–452. doi: 10.3171/jns.1995.83.3.0445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kido D. K., Cox C., Hamill R. W., Rothenberg B. M., Woolf P. D. Traumatic brain injuries: predictive usefulness of CT. Radiology. 1992 Mar;182(3):777–781. doi: 10.1148/radiology.182.3.1535893. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Liu H. M., Tu Y. K., Su C. T. Changes of brainstem and perimesencephalic cistern: dynamic predictor of outcome in severe head injury. J Trauma. 1995 Mar;38(3):330–333. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199503000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lobato R. D., Cordobes F., Rivas J. J., de la Fuente M., Montero A., Barcena A., Perez C., Cabrera A., Lamas E. Outcome from severe head injury related to the type of intracranial lesion. A computerized tomography study. J Neurosurg. 1983 Nov;59(5):762–774. doi: 10.3171/jns.1983.59.5.0762. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lobato R. D., Gomez P. A., Alday R., Rivas J. J., Dominguez J., Cabrera A., Turanzas F. S., Benitez A., Rivero B. Sequential computerized tomography changes and related final outcome in severe head injury patients. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1997;139(5):385–391. doi: 10.1007/BF01808871. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Marshall L. F., Marshall S. B., Klauber M. R., Van Berkum Clark M., Eisenberg H., Jane J. A., Luerssen T. G., Marmarou A., Foulkes M. A. The diagnosis of head injury requires a classification based on computed axial tomography. J Neurotrauma. 1992 Mar;9 (Suppl 1):S287–S292. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Poca M. A., Sahuquillo J., Báguena M., Pedraza S., Gracia R. M., Rubio E. Incidence of intracranial hypertension after severe head injury: a prospective study using the Traumatic Coma Data Bank classification. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 1998;71:27–30. doi: 10.1007/978-3-7091-6475-4_8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Raabe A., Grolms C., Keller M., Döhnert J., Sorge O., Seifert V. Correlation of computed tomography findings and serum brain damage markers following severe head injury. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1998;140(8):787–792. doi: 10.1007/s007010050180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Signorini D. F., Andrews P. J., Jones P. A., Wardlaw J. M., Miller J. D. Predicting survival using simple clinical variables: a case study in traumatic brain injury. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1999 Jan;66(1):20–25. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.66.1.20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Teasdale G., Teasdale E., Hadley D. Computed tomographic and magnetic resonance imaging classification of head injury. J Neurotrauma. 1992 Mar;9 (Suppl 1):S249–S257. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. van der Naalt J., Hew J. M., van Zomeren A. H., Sluiter W. J., Minderhoud J. M. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in mild to moderate head injury: early and late imaging related to outcome. Ann Neurol. 1999 Jul;46(1):70–78. doi: 10.1002/1531-8249(199907)46:1<70::aid-ana11>3.0.co;2-l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES