Skip to main content
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health logoLink to Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
. 2002 Jun;56(6):413–417. doi: 10.1136/jech.56.6.413

Bunk versus conventional beds: a comparative assessment of fall injury risk

M Belechri 1, E Petridou 1, D Trichopoulos 1
PMCID: PMC1732180  PMID: 12011194

Abstract

Study design: Case-control investigation.

Setting: Accident and emergency departments of four hospitals in Greece, namely a teaching children's hospital and a trauma hospital in Greater Athens and the two district hospitals in the Magnesia county and the Corfu island.

Patients: During the three year period 1996–98, 1881 children (0–14 years) presenting with bed fall injuries were recorded by the Emergency Department Injury Surveillance System (EDISS). Out of these, 197 children with falls from bunk beds served as cases and 1684 children with falls from conventional beds served as controls.

Results: From the analysis and a nationwide extrapolation, it was calculated that each year about 5000 children in Greece (total population 10 million) seek medical attendance at an emergency department for a bed injury, corresponding to an estimated incidence of about 3 per 1000 children years. Out of bed fall injuries, 10.5% are from bunk beds, 10.4% from cribs, 3.1% from cots, and 76.0% from other conventional beds. Falls from the bed ladder accounted for 8% of all bunk bed injuries. Boys are at higher risk for falls from beds but there is no evidence that the proportion is different depending on the type of bed used. Relatively few falls from bunk beds are recorded outside the crowded apartments of Greater Athens or among migrant children. The increased relative risk of injuries from bunk bed falls during the sleeping hours indicates the higher risk of injury after a fall from a bunk rather than a conventional bed. Injuries from bunk bed falls are generally more serious than those from conventional bed falls (overrepresentation of brain injuries, fractures, multiple injuries, and injuries requiring hospitalisation). Overall, it can be estimated that almost half of the sleep related bunk bed injuries are easily preventable.

Conclusions: Falls from bunk beds represent a non-negligible childhood injury risk. A sizeable fraction can be avoided with simple design modifications of the product, such as use of side rails in the upper bed or removal of the bed ladder when not in use.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (81.5 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Cummins B. H., Potter J. M. Head injury due to falls from heights. Injury. 1970 Jul;2(1):61–64. doi: 10.1016/s0020-1383(70)80120-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Garrettson L. K., Gallagher S. S. Falls in children and youth. Pediatr Clin North Am. 1985 Feb;32(1):153–162. doi: 10.1016/s0031-3955(16)34763-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Macgregor D. M. Injuries associated with falls from beds. Inj Prev. 2000 Dec;6(4):291–292. doi: 10.1136/ip.6.4.291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Mayr J. M., Seebacher U., Lawrenz K., Pesendorfer P., Berghold A., Baradaran S. Bunk beds--a still underestimated risk for accidents in childhood? Eur J Pediatr. 2000 Jun;159(6):440–443. doi: 10.1007/s004310051303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Petridou E. Injury prevention: an uphill battle. Inj Prev. 1995 Mar;1(1):8–8. doi: 10.1136/ip.1.1.8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Reichelderfer T. E., Overbach A., Greensher J. Unsafe playgrounds. Pediatrics. 1979 Dec;64(6):962–963. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Selbst S. M., Baker M. D., Shames M. Bunk bed injuries. Am J Dis Child. 1990 Jun;144(6):721–723. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1990.02150300121031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES