Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Quality & Safety in Health Care logoLink to Quality & Safety in Health Care
. 2002 Sep;11(3):214–218. doi: 10.1136/qhc.11.3.214

Guideline adherence rates and interprofessional variation in a vignette study of depression

H Tiemeier 1, W J de Vries 1, Loo M van het 1, J Kahan 1, N Klazinga 1, R Grol 1, H Rigter 1
PMCID: PMC1743623  PMID: 12486983

Abstract

Objective: To assess the appropriateness of and variation in intention-to-treat decisions in the management of depression in the Netherlands.

Design: Mailed survey with 22 paper cases (vignettes) based on a population study.

Setting: A random sample from four professional groups in the Dutch mental healthcare system.

Subjects: 264 general practitioners, psychiatrists, psychotherapists, and clinical psychologists.

Main outcome measures: Each vignette contained information on a number of patient characteristics taken from three national depression guidelines. The distribution of patient characteristics was based on data from a population study. Respondents were asked to choose the best treatment option and the best treatment setting. For each vignette we examined which of the selected treatments was appropriate according to the recommendations of the three published Dutch clinical guidelines and a panel of experts.

Results: 31% of all intention-to-treat decisions were not consistent with the guidelines. Overall, less severe depression, alcohol abuse, psychotic features, and lack of social resources were related to more inappropriate judgements. There was considerable variation between the professional groups: psychiatrists made more appropriate choices than the other professions although they had the highest rate of overtreatment.

Conclusions: There is sufficient variation in the intentions to treat depression to give it priority in quality assessment and guideline development. Efforts to achieve appropriate care should focus on treatment indications, referral patterns, and overtreatment.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (120.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ayanian J. Z., Landrum M. B., Normand S. L., Guadagnoli E., McNeil B. J. Rating the appropriateness of coronary angiography--do practicing physicians agree with an expert panel and with each other? N Engl J Med. 1998 Jun 25;338(26):1896–1904. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199806253382608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bijl R. V., Ravelli A., van Zessen G. Prevalence of psychiatric disorder in the general population: results of The Netherlands Mental Health Survey and Incidence Study (NEMESIS). Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 1998 Dec;33(12):587–595. doi: 10.1007/s001270050098. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bingefors K., Isacson D., von Knorring L. Antidepressant dose patterns in Swedish clinical practice. Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 1997 Sep;12(5):283–290. doi: 10.1097/00004850-199709000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Carline J. D., Scher M. Comparison of course evaluations by random and volunteer student samples. J Med Educ. 1981 Feb;56(2):122–127. doi: 10.1097/00001888-198102000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chassin M. R., Galvin R. W. The urgent need to improve health care quality. Institute of Medicine National Roundtable on Health Care Quality. JAMA. 1998 Sep 16;280(11):1000–1005. doi: 10.1001/jama.280.11.1000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fairman K. A., Drevets W. C., Kreisman J. J., Teitelbaum F. Course of antidepressant treatment drug type, and prescriber's specialty. Psychiatr Serv. 1998 Sep;49(9):1180–1186. doi: 10.1176/ps.49.9.1180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Fortney J., Rost K., Zhang M., Pyne J. The relationship between quality and outcomes in routine depression care. Psychiatr Serv. 2001 Jan;52(1):56–62. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.52.1.56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Higgins E. S. A review of unrecognized mental illness in primary care. Prevalence, natural history, and efforts to change the course. Arch Fam Med. 1994 Oct;3(10):908–917. doi: 10.1001/archfami.3.10.908. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hirschfeld R. M., Keller M. B., Panico S., Arons B. S., Barlow D., Davidoff F., Endicott J., Froom J., Goldstein M., Gorman J. M. The National Depressive and Manic-Depressive Association consensus statement on the undertreatment of depression. JAMA. 1997 Jan 22;277(4):333–340. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Isacsson G., Bergman U., Wasserman D., Redfors I., Sjöqvist F. The use of antidepressants and therapeutic drug monitoring by general practitioners and psychiatrists: findings from a questionnaire survey in two Swedish areas. Ann Clin Psychiatry. 1996 Sep;8(3):153–160. doi: 10.3109/10401239609147752. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Isometsä E., Seppälä I., Henriksson M., Kekki P., Lönnqvist J. Inadequate dosaging in general practice of tricyclic vs. other antidepressants for depression. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1998 Dec;98(6):451–454. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1998.tb10118.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kerr M. P. Antidepressant prescribing: a comparison between general practitioners and psychiatrists. Br J Gen Pract. 1994 Jun;44(383):275–276. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kerr M., Blizard R., Mann A. General practitioners and psychiatrists: comparison of attitudes to depression using the depression attitude questionnaire. Br J Gen Pract. 1995 Feb;45(391):89–92. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Naylor C. D. Grey zones of clinical practice: some limits to evidence-based medicine. Lancet. 1995 Apr 1;345(8953):840–842. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(95)92969-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ornstein S., Stuart G., Jenkins R. Depression diagnoses and antidepressant use in primary care practices: a study from the Practice Partner Research Network (PPRNet). J Fam Pract. 2000 Jan;49(1):68–72. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Orrell M., Collins E., Shergill S., Katona C. Management of depression in the elderly by general practitioners: I. Use of antidepressants. Fam Pract. 1995 Mar;12(1):5–11. doi: 10.1093/fampra/12.1.5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Peabody J. W., Luck J., Glassman P., Dresselhaus T. R., Lee M. Comparison of vignettes, standardized patients, and chart abstraction: a prospective validation study of 3 methods for measuring quality. JAMA. 2000 Apr 5;283(13):1715–1722. doi: 10.1001/jama.283.13.1715. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Reifler D. R., Kessler H. S., Bernhard E. J., Leon A. C., Martin G. J. Impact of screening for mental health concerns on health service utilization and functional status in primary care patients. Arch Intern Med. 1996 Dec 9;156(22):2593–2599. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Ross S., Moffat K., McConnachie A., Gordon J., Wilson P. Sex and attitude: a randomized vignette study of the management of depression by general practitioners. Br J Gen Pract. 1999 Jan;49(438):17–21. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Rost K., Smith G. R., Burnam M. A., Burns B. J. Measuring the outcomes of care for mental health problems. The case of depressive disorders. Med Care. 1992 May;30(5 Suppl):MS266–MS273. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199205001-00026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Shao W. A., Williams J. W., Jr, Lee S., Badgett R. G., Aaronson B., Cornell J. E. Knowledge and attitudes about depression among non-generalists and generalists. J Fam Pract. 1997 Feb;44(2):161–168. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Timmermans D. R., Gooszen A. W., Geelkerken R. H., Tollenaar R. A., Gooszen H. G. Analysis of the variety in surgeons' decision strategies for the management of left colonic emergencies. Med Care. 1997 Jul;35(7):701–713. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199707000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Uncapher H., Areán P. A. Physicians are less willing to treat suicidal ideation in older patients. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000 Feb;48(2):188–192. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2000.tb03910.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Von Korff M., Goldberg D. Improving outcomes in depression. BMJ. 2001 Oct 27;323(7319):948–949. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7319.948. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Whitehouse C. R. A survey of the management of psychosocial illness in general practice in Manchester. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1987 Mar;37(296):112–115. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Williams J. W., Jr, Barrett J., Oxman T., Frank E., Katon W., Sullivan M., Cornell J., Sengupta A. Treatment of dysthymia and minor depression in primary care: A randomized controlled trial in older adults. JAMA. 2000 Sep 27;284(12):1519–1526. doi: 10.1001/jama.284.12.1519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Williams J. W., Jr, Rost K., Dietrich A. J., Ciotti M. C., Zyzanski S. J., Cornell J. Primary care physicians' approach to depressive disorders. Effects of physician specialty and practice structure. Arch Fam Med. 1999 Jan-Feb;8(1):58–67. doi: 10.1001/archfami.8.1.58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Quality & safety in health care are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES