Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health logoLink to Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
. 2003 Sep;57(9):687–691. doi: 10.1136/jech.57.9.687

Social inequalities in low birth weight in England and Wales: trends and implications for future population health

K Moser 1, L Li 1, C Power 1
PMCID: PMC1732588  PMID: 12933774

Abstract

Study objective: To examine social inequalities and trends in low birth weight in England and Wales.

Design: Analysis of routine birth data, comparing (a) couple and sole registered births, and (b) manual and non-manual occupational groups.

Setting: England and Wales, 1993–2000.

Main results: Social inequalities in low birth weight were evident throughout 1993–2000: relative to the non-manual group, there is an increased risk for the manual group (range in RR 1.22–1.35) and sole registrations (RR 1.51–1.67). An estimated 6.5% (2979 births) of low birth weight in 2000 could have been avoided if risks associated with the manual group were absent, and 2.8% (1290 births) avoided if risks associated with sole registration were absent. Between 1993 and 2000, the low birthweight rate increased significantly with an estimated overall increase of 11%. Increases were evident in all social groups (15% in manual, 11% in sole registrations and 9% in non-manual); however relative to non-manual the increase in RRs were not statistically significant for manual or sole registrations. When multiple births are excluded, the rate of low birth weight is reduced but there is still a significant increase over time and social differentials are undiminished.

Conclusions: There are social inequalities in low birth weight in England and Wales that have not narrowed over an eight year period, 1993–2000. These inequalities are likely to affect childhood and adult health inequalities in the future, hence strategies will need to address differences in low birth weight and further monitoring of trends is therefore desirable.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (121.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Emanuel I. Invited commentary: an assessment of maternal intergenerational factors in pregnancy outcome. Am J Epidemiol. 1997 Nov 15;146(10):820–825. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Goldstein H. Factors influencing the height of seven year old children--results from the National Child Development Study. Hum Biol. 1971 Feb;43(1):92–111. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Huxley R. R., Shiell A. W., Law C. M. The role of size at birth and postnatal catch-up growth in determining systolic blood pressure: a systematic review of the literature. J Hypertens. 2000 Jul;18(7):815–831. doi: 10.1097/00004872-200018070-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hyppönen E., Leon D. A., Kenward M. G., Lithell H. Prenatal growth and risk of occlusive and haemorrhagic stroke in Swedish men and women born 1915-29: historical cohort study. BMJ. 2001 Nov 3;323(7320):1033–1034. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7320.1033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kuh D., Wadsworth M. Parental height: childhood environment and subsequent adult height in a national birth cohort. Int J Epidemiol. 1989 Sep;18(3):663–668. doi: 10.1093/ije/18.3.663. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Lithell H. O., McKeigue P. M., Berglund L., Mohsen R., Lithell U. B., Leon D. A. Relation of size at birth to non-insulin dependent diabetes and insulin concentrations in men aged 50-60 years. BMJ. 1996 Feb 17;312(7028):406–410. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7028.406. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Pattenden S., Dolk H., Vrijheid M. Inequalities in low birth weight: parental social class, area deprivation, and "lone mother" status. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1999 Jun;53(6):355–358. doi: 10.1136/jech.53.6.355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Pharoah P. O., Stevenson C. J., Cooke R. W., Stevenson R. C. Clinical and subclinical deficits at 8 years in a geographically defined cohort of low birthweight infants. Arch Dis Child. 1994 Apr;70(4):264–270. doi: 10.1136/adc.70.4.264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Power C., Li L. Cohort study of birthweight, mortality, and disability. BMJ. 2000 Mar 25;320(7238):840–841. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7238.840. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Power C. National trends in birth weight: implications for future adult disease. BMJ. 1994 May 14;308(6939):1270–1271. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6939.1270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Rich-Edwards J. W., Stampfer M. J., Manson J. E., Rosner B., Hankinson S. E., Colditz G. A., Willett W. C., Hennekens C. H. Birth weight and risk of cardiovascular disease in a cohort of women followed up since 1976. BMJ. 1997 Aug 16;315(7105):396–400. doi: 10.1136/bmj.315.7105.396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Shouls S., Whitehead M., Burström B., Diderichsen F. The health and socio-economic circumstances of British lone mothers over the last two decades. Popul Trends. 1999 Spring;(95):41–46. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Spencer N., Logan S. Social influences on birth weight. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2002 May;56(5):326–327. doi: 10.1136/jech.56.5.326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Strauss R. S. Adult functional outcome of those born small for gestational age: twenty-six-year follow-up of the 1970 British Birth Cohort. JAMA. 2000 Feb 2;283(5):625–632. doi: 10.1001/jama.283.5.625. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Whitehead M., Drever F. Narrowing social inequalities in health? Analysis of trends in mortality among babies of lone mothers (abridged version 1). BMJ. 1999 Apr 3;318(7188):908–912. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES