Abstract
We explore the evolution of delayed age- and size-dependent flowering in the monocarpic perennial Carlina vulgaris, by extending the recently developed integral projection approach to include demographic rates that depend on size and age. The parameterized model has excellent descriptive properties both in terms of the population size and in terms of the distributions of sizes within each age class. In Carlina the probability of flowering depends on both plant size and age. We use the parameterized model to predict this relationship, using the evolutionarily stable strategy (ESS) approach. Despite accurately predicting the mean size of flowering individuals, the model predicts a step-function relationship between the probability of flowering and plant size, which has no age component. When the variance of the flowering-threshold distribution is constrained to the observed value, the ESS flowering function contains an age component, but underpredicts the mean flowering size. An analytical approximation is used to explore the effect of variation in the flowering strategy on the ESS predictions. Elasticity analysis is used to partition the agespecific contributions to the finite rate of increase (lambda) of the survival-growth and fecundity components of the model. We calculate the adaptive landscape that defines the ESS and generate a fitness landscape for invading phenotypes in the presence of the observed flowering strategy. The implications of these results for the patterns of genetic diversity in the flowering strategy and for testing evolutionary models are discussed. Results proving the existence of a dominant eigenvalue and its associated eigenvectors in general size- and age-dependent integral projection models are presented.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (222.9 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- COLE L. C. The population consequences of life history phenomena. Q Rev Biol. 1954 Jun;29(2):103–137. doi: 10.1086/400074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Goodman L. A. The analysis of population growth when the birth and death rates depend upon several factors. Biometrics. 1969 Dec;25(4):659–681. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rand D. A., Wilson H. B., McGlade J. M. Dynamics and evolution: evolutionarily stable attractors, invasion exponents and phenotype dynamics. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1994 Feb 28;343(1035):261–283. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1994.0025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rees M, Sheppard A, Briese D, Mangel M. Evolution of Size-Dependent Flowering in Onopordum illyricum: A Quantitative Assessment of the Role of Stochastic Selection Pressures. Am Nat. 1999 Dec;154(6):628–651. doi: 10.1086/303268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rees Mark, Rose Karen E. Evolution of flowering strategies in Oenothera glazioviana: an integral projection model approach. Proc Biol Sci. 2002 Jul 22;269(1499):1509–1515. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rose Karen E., Rees Mark, Grubb Peter J. Evolution in the real world: stochastic variation and the determinants of fitness in Carlina vulgaris. Evolution. 2002 Jul;56(7):1416–1430. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2002.tb01454.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Simons A. M., Johnston M. O. Plasticity and the genetics of reproductive behaviour in the monocarpic perennial, Lobelia inflata (Indian tobacco). Heredity (Edinb) 2000 Oct;85(Pt 4):356–365. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2540.2000.00760.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wright S. Evolution in Mendelian Populations. Genetics. 1931 Mar;16(2):97–159. doi: 10.1093/genetics/16.2.97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]