Abstract
Background
Degenerative spondylolisthesis of the cervical spine is rare. Patients show signs of progredient myelopathy, radiculopathy and pain. Treatment strategies include ventral, dorsal and combined fusion techniques with or without repositioning and decompression.
Methods
In this study, we present 16 patients with degenerative cervical spondylolisthesis. The leading symptom was severe myelopathy in 8 patients, radiculomyelopathy in 5 patients and neck pain in 3 patients. However, neck pain was the initial symptom in all the patients and decreased when neurological symptoms became more evident. Radiographic examinations included plain radiography, MRI, CT, myelography and lateral tomography.
Results
Spondylolisthesis was located five times at level C3/4, C4/5 and C5/6. In three cases spondylolisthesis was located at level C7/T1. There were two patients with spondylolisthesis on two levels. Instability could be demonstrated by flexion/extension radiography in five cases. Patients were divided into three groups according to a newly introduced classification system. The surgical approach corresponded to this classification. In ten patients the spondylolisthesis could be corrected by extension and positioning, so discectomy and fusion on one or two levels with cage, plate and screws was sufficient. In five cases a corpectomy was necessary due to severe spondylosis. In one case a combined approach with dorsal decompression and release followed by ventral fusion was applied due to additional dorsal spinal cord compression. The follow-up period was 6–52 months. After surgery, none of the patients showed any signs of neurological deterioration. In all cases, a stable fusion was achieved with no signs of instability on flexion/extension radiographs. Neurological improvement was seen in 6 of 8 patients with myelopathy and 4 of 5 patients with radiculomyelopathy. The others showed stable disease. Pain relief was seen in all patients who complained of pain preoperatively.
Conclusion
The aims of treatment for cervical spondylolisthesis are spinal cord decompression (ventral, dorsal or both), correction and fusion. The used procedure should depend on the severity of the cervical deformity, degree and side of the spinal cord compression, and the possibility of correction by extension and positioning.
Keywords: Spondylolisthesis, Cervical spine, Myelopathy, Degenerative instability, Fusion
References
- 1.Boulos AS, Lovely TJ. Degenerative cervical spondylolisthesis: diagnosis and management in five cases. J Spinal Disord. 1996;9:241–245. doi: 10.1097/00002517-199606000-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Deburge A, Mazda K, Guigui P. Unstable degenerative spondylolisthesis of the cervical spine. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1995;77:122–125. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Eleraky MA, Llanos C, Sonntag VK. Cervical corpectomy: report of 185 cases and review of the literature. J Neurosurg. 1999;90:35–41. doi: 10.3171/jns.1999.90.1.0035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Fujimura Y, Nishi Y, Chiba K, Kobayashi K. Prognosis of neurological deficits associated with upper cervical spine injuries. Paraplegia. 1995;33:195–202. doi: 10.1038/sc.1995.44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Goffin J, Grob D. Spondyloptosis of the cervical spine in neurofibromatosis. A case report. Spine. 1999;24:587–590. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199903150-00020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Hacker RJ, Cauthen JC, Gilbert TJ, Griffith SL. A prospective randomized multicenter clinical evaluation of an anterior cervical fusion cage. Spine. 2000;25:2646–2654. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200010150-00017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Holmes A, Wang C, Han ZH, Dang GT. The range and nature of flexion-extension motion in the cervical spine. Spine. 1994;19:2505–2510. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199411001-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kirkaldy-Willis WH, Wedge JH, Yong-Hing K, Reilly J. Pathology and pathogenesis of lumbar spondylosis and stenosis. Spine. 1978;3:319–328. doi: 10.1097/00007632-197812000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Lee C, Woodring JH, Rogers LF, Kim KS. The radiographic distinction of degenerative slippage (spondylolisthesis and retrolisthesis) from traumatic slippage of the cervical spine. Skeletal Radiol. 1986;15:439–443. doi: 10.1007/BF00355101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Odom GL, Finney W, Woodhall B, Durham NC. Cervical disc lesions. JAMA. 1958;166:23–28. doi: 10.1001/jama.1958.02990010025006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Penning L. Normal movements of the cervical spine. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1978;130:317–326. doi: 10.2214/ajr.130.2.317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Postacchini F, Perugia D. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. Part I: etiology, pathogenesis, pathomorphology, and clinical features. Ital J Orthop Traumatol. 1991;17:165–173. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Sy MH, Marouf OC, Sene P, Diouf S, Seye SI. [Cervical spondylolisthesis in skeletal fluorosis. A case report] Int Orthop. 1998;22:407–409. doi: 10.1007/s002640050289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Tani T, Kawasaki M, Taniguchi S, Ushida T. Functional importance of degenerative spondylolisthesis in cervical spondylotic myelopathy in the elderly. Spine. 2003;28:1128–1134. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200306010-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]