Skip to main content
Emergency Medicine Journal : EMJ logoLink to Emergency Medicine Journal : EMJ
. 2004 Nov;21(6):685–691. doi: 10.1136/emj.2002.003673

Reviewing emergency care systems I: insights from system dynamics modelling

V Lattimer 1, S Brailsford 1, J Turnbull 1, P Tarnaras 1, H Smith 1, S George 1, K Gerard 1, S Maslin-Prothero 1
PMCID: PMC1726513  PMID: 15496694

Abstract

Objectives: To describe the components of an emergency and urgent care system within one health authority and to investigate ways in which patient flows and system capacity could be improved.

Methods: Using a qualitative system dynamics (SD) approach, data from interviews were used to build a conceptual map of the system illustrating patient pathways from entry to discharge. The map was used to construct a quantitative SD model populated with demographic and activity data to simulate patterns of demand, activity, contingencies, and system bottlenecks. Using simulation experiments, a range of scenarios were tested to determine their likely effectiveness in meeting future objectives and targets.

Results: Emergency hospital admissions grew at a faster annual rate than the national average for 1998–2001. Without intervention, and assuming this trend continued, acute hospitals were likely to have difficulty sustaining levels of elective work, in reaching elective admission targets and in achieving bed occupancy targets. General practice admissions exerted the greatest influence on occupancy rates. Prevention of emergency admissions for older people (3%–6% each year) reduced bed occupancy in both hospitals by 1% per annum over five years. Prevention of emergency admissions for patients with chronic respiratory disease affected occupancy less noticeably, but because of the seasonal pattern of admissions, had an effect on peak winter occupancy.

Conclusions: Modelling showed the potential consequences of continued growth in demand for emergency care, but also considerable scope to intervene to ameliorate the worst case scenarios, in particular by increasing the care management options available in the community.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (225.6 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Brogan C., Pickard D., Gray A., Fairman S., Hill A. The use of out of hours health services: a cross sectional survey. BMJ. 1998 Feb 14;316(7130):524–527. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7130.524. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Carlisle R., Avery A. J., Marsh P. Primary care teams work harder in deprived areas. J Public Health Med. 2002 Mar;24(1):43–48. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/24.1.43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Carlisle R., Groom L. M., Avery A. J., Boot D., Earwicker S. Relation of out of hours activity by general practice and accident and emergency services with deprivation in Nottingham: longitudinal survey. BMJ. 1998 Feb 14;316(7130):520–523. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7130.520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cooke M. W., Wilson S., Pearson S. The effect of a separate stream for minor injuries on accident and emergency department waiting times. Emerg Med J. 2002 Jan;19(1):28–30. doi: 10.1136/emj.19.1.28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Reid F. D., Cook D. G., Majeed A. Explaining variation in hospital admission rates between general practices: cross sectional study. BMJ. 1999 Jul 10;319(7202):98–103. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7202.98. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Shrimpling Marisa. Redesigning triage to reduce waiting times. Emerg Nurse. 2002 May;10(2):34–37. doi: 10.7748/en2002.05.10.2.34.c7658. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Emergency Medicine Journal : EMJ are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES